Science of Relationships / 1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Science of Relationships / 1 SCIENCE OF RELATIONSHIPS / 1 The Science of Relationships: Answers to Your Question about Dating, Marriage, & Family Edited by: Gary W. Lewandowski, Jr., Timothy J. Loving, Benjamin Le, & Marci E. J. Gleason Contributing Authors: Jennifer J. Harman, Jody L. Davis, Lorne Campbell, Robin S. Edelstein, Nancy E. Frye, Lisa A. Neff, M. Minda Oriña, Debra Mashek, & Eshkol Rafaeli Copyright © 2013 Dr. L Industries, LLC All rights reserved. No part of the contents of this book may be reproduced without the written permission of the publisher. Kendall-Hunt Publishing Company previously published an earlier version of this book. www.ScienceOfRelationships.com SCIENCE OF RELATIONSHIPS / 2 Preface You might be wondering "why do we need another book on relationships?" Well, if the book in question is like all of the existing books out there, in that it offers the opinion of a single author...the answer is we don't need another book on relationships – at least like that. What we do need is a book on relationships that takes a new approach. Thankfully, the book you are about to read represents a new way of writing about relationships. Up to this point, if you wanted to learn about relationships the most common way to do so was to read a traditional self-help or advice book, read an advice page on the Internet, or pick up a magazine from the check-out line at the store. Other options, though largely underutilized, would be to take a college course on relationships or read the hundreds of scientific articles that relationship scholars publish annually in academic journals. These approaches each have their pros and cons. This book offers a new option, representing a hybrid that capitalizes on the positive features of both popular and academic sources. This new approach presents the leading research on romantic relationships in a way that is informative, engaging, and fun. The contributors of this book, all of whom are experts in the scientific study of interpersonal relationships, collectively felt that the relationship books currently lining bookshelves were too heavy on opinion and too light on quality fact-based information. So, on a snowy, June night in Breckenridge, Colorado, as over a dozen of us crammed into a hot tub, the idea for this book was born. Now you might be wondering if that was too many people. For a six person hot tub, perhaps. But for a book on relationships that seeks to provide expert information, the more the merrier. In fact, the scope of relationships is so broad that it is nearly impossible for any one person to be an expert on the entire field. Having so many experts insures that someone with a deep knowledge of that area delivers the information. All of the contributors to this book hold a Ph.D. in the study of relationships. Our specialties cover the spectrum of relationship experiences including: dating, attraction, passion, making love last, and breaking up, to name a few. Collectively, we have been studying relationships for 200 years! Not only are we relationship scientists, but a majority of us are also college professors who routinely teach classes on relationships. As a group we have also dated, divorced, been engaged, been dumped, cheated, been cheated on, fallen in love, gotten into fights, made-up, hooked-up, had kids, and avoided having kids, although not necessarily in that order. So we don't just study relationships, we have lived them as well! Our combined personal experiences and doctoral training make this type of book, where research findings are applied to everyday contexts, possible. We all have relationships, so aren't we all experts? Not exactly. Just because people prepare their own dinner every night, it doesn't make them all Jamie Oliver, Rachel Ray, or Wolfgang Puck. When it comes to relationships, an expert is someone who has extensive knowledge of the scientific research. But why is research important? A fundamental human motivation involves trying to understand the world. Often we seek understanding by gathering information SCIENCE OF RELATIONSHIPS / 3 about our lives through comparisons to others. In the context of relationships it is not uncommon to ask friends what their relationships are like as a way of better understanding your own. Other times you might go to the bookstore to pick up a book about relationships or simply go Googling for the answers. While these sources will provide information about your relationships, they are limited in a very important way. They represent the opinions of only a few people (e.g., your friend and the author of the book). If you had a chance to ask hundreds or thousands of people about their relationships, how their partners treat them, if they ever experience feelings of doubt, etc., would you? In essence, this is what we do as researchers. We pose questions and have hundreds of people provide responses so that we can more accurately capture what relationships are generally like. This way we are sure to get a better feel for what most people's experiences are like, rather than the potentially idiosyncratic or biased viewpoints of a few individuals who happen to write relationship books. Similarly, if you want to know what most people watch on TV you would look at the Nielsen ratings, not what your next door neighbor watches. Some people might think no one knows their relationships better than they do, so it doesn't matter what other people have to say. Unfortunately, we are often inaccurate in our perceptions and evaluations of ourselves. People who want to believe their relationships are perfect will seek out information that confirms these beliefs, and when confronted with evidence that their relationships aren't perfect they tend to find fault with the evidence. Because of these biases, it is important to use scientific information that arrives at objective conclusions that are untainted by personal beliefs. This way you can focus on how things really are, and less on how you hope things are. One of the complaints people often have about science, and scientific writing, is that it is often not very definitive and instead provides lots of "it depends" types of answers. While it is true that no conclusion is 100% certain, general conclusions can still be made. Throughout the book we have tried to provide you with the "take home points" that have emerged from research, while also discussing the many details and caveats that characterize complex social relationships. Thus, in some cases, our characterization of an original study may be somewhat of a departure from the original author's intended conclusion. Much like you can drive a car or use your iPad without fully understanding how it works, we believe that you can benefit from the scientific study of relationships without knowing all of the details. However, we do hope that a byproduct of your interest in this book will be an enhanced curiosity into the methods scientists use to uncover this information. Still skeptical about the need for experts and science in living your own individual life? Consider the case of the weather. On a daily basis we often benefit from being informed about what the conditions outside will be like. Is it going to rain? Will it be cold? To find out this information, we don't call our friend to see what they think. Instead, we rely on the weather forecast that is based on the collection of large amounts of data, which is then interpreted by experts. If scientific data are good enough to dictate your wardrobe, shouldn't they be good enough to help with other areas of your life? We think so. SCIENCE OF RELATIONSHIPS / 4 We have gathered a collection of the most commonly asked questions about relationships and families to help provide you with the information that will be most useful to your relationship. Each question is followed by an answer based in science, presented in a way that is easy to understand and apply to your relationships. We have organized the book, and partitioned the questions around the most common themes relationship scientists tend to focus their attention (e.g., attraction, love, commitment, etc.). Each theme serves as its own Section, with three or more questions covered as part of each section. Within each question, we have cited the relevant scientific literature using numbers in [brackets]. In addition, at the end of each question we have highlighted the important Take Home Points, provided the References for the research cited, and suggested additional resources for readers to Dig Deeper into the topic. As a whole, the book contains up-to-date scientific findings on attraction, finding a partner, dating, flirting, whether or not love lasts forever, why people break-up, getting over a break-up, whether or not some people are more ready for relationships than others, what makes us become close to another, the experience of love, the role of sex in relationships, knowing if you have a good partner/relationship, why people stay in a bad relationship, the role of counseling, how relationships change over time, cheating, jealousy, conflict, improving communication, good and bad fighting, cohabitation, having kids, and parenting. You might think that's a lot of information. In reality, this is only the tip of the iceberg. SCIENCE OF RELATIONSHIPS / 5 Section 1: Attraction & Relationship Initiation Take a second to look up from your book and quickly glance at the person nearest to you (take a peek at a picture if you're reading alone). In the blink of an eye you have registered that person's physical attractiveness. Are they closer to a perfect 10 or a perfect zero? Every enduring romance has to start somewhere, and that place is often a spark of physical attraction.
Recommended publications
  • Friendship Characteristics, Threat Appraisals, and Varieties of Jealousy About Romantic Partners’ Friendships
    Interpersona | An International Journal on Personal Relationships interpersona.psychopen.eu | 1981-6472 Articles Friendship Characteristics, Threat Appraisals, and Varieties of Jealousy About Romantic Partners’ Friendships Timothy R. Worley* a, Jennifer Samp b [a] Murray State University, Murray, KY, USA. [b] Department of Communication Studies, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA. Abstract This study examined the role of friendship sex composition, friendship history, and threat appraisals in the experience of jealousy about a romantic partner’s involvement in extradyadic friendships. Using a survey, 201 individuals responded to scenarios describing a romantic partner’s involvement in a significant friendship outside the romantic dyad. A partner’s involvement in a cross-sex friendship was associated with greater perceptions of threat to both the existence and quality of the romantic relationship than was a partner’s involvement in a same-sex friendship. Further, the specific forms of jealousy experienced about partners’ friendships were dependent on the threat appraisals individuals associated with the friendships. Appraisals of relational existence threat mediated the influence of friendship characteristics (i.e., sex composition and history) on sexual jealousy and companionship jealousy, while appraisals of relational quality threat mediated the influence of friendship characteristics on intimacy jealousy, power jealousy, and companionship jealousy. This study points toward the central role of threat appraisals in mediating associations between rival characteristics and various forms of jealousy about a partner’s friendships. Keywords: jealousy, friendship, threat appraisals, cross-sex friendships Interpersona, 2014, Vol. 8(2), 231–244, doi:10.5964/ijpr.v8i2.169 Received: 2014-07-02. Accepted: 2014-10-29. Published (VoR): 2014-12-19.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Communicative Infidelity on Relationship Outcomes
    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2009 Stay or leave? The effects of communicative infidelity on relationship outcomes Colleen C. Malachowski West Virginia University Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Malachowski, Colleen C., "Stay or leave? The effects of communicative infidelity on relationship outcomes" (2009). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 794. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/794 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Stay or Leave? The Effects of Communicative Infidelity on Relationship Outcomes Colleen C. Malachowski Thesis submitted to the Eberly College of Arts and Sciences at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Communication Theory and Research Megan R. Dillow, Ph.D., Chair Maria Brann, Ph.D. Keith Weber, Ed.D. Department of Communication Studies Morgantown, West Virginia 2009 Keywords: Communicative Infidelity; Investment Model; Forgiveness; Exit; Voice; Neglect ABSTRACT Stay or Leave? The Effects of Communicative Infidelity on Relationship Outcomes Colleen C.
    [Show full text]
  • Steps Toward the Ripening of Relationship Science
    Personal Relationships, 14 (2007), 1–23. Printed in the United States of America. Copyright Ó 2007 IARR. 1350-4126=07 DISTINGUISHED SCHOLAR ARTICLE Steps toward the ripening of relationship science HARRY T. REIS The University of Rochester Harry T. Reis is professor of psychology in the Department of Clinical and Social Sciences in Psychology at the Uni- versity of Rochester. He first studied human relationships at the City College of New York, where he received a B.S. in 1970. Reis subsequently received a Ph.D. from New York University in 1975. A former president of the International Society for the Study of Personal Relationships (2000– 2001), he served as editor of the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology: Interpersonal and Group Processes (1986–1990) and is currently editor of Current Directions in Psychological Science. After 10 years as its executive offi- cer (1995–2004), the Society for Personality and Social Psychology awarded him the Distinguished Service Award (2006) and elected him as president (2007). Reis served as member or Chair of the American Psychological Associa- tion’s Board of Scientific Affairs from 2001 through 2003, is a Fellow of the American Psychological Association and of the Association for Psychological Science, and was a Ful- bright Senior Research Fellow in the Netherlands in 1991. Reis’s research, which concerns mechanisms that regulate interpersonal processes, has been funded by the National Science Foundation, the National Institute of Mental Health, and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Abstract Recent decades have seen remarkable growth in research and theorizing about relationships. E.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Blockchain-Powered Relationship Registry & Love AI
    The First Blockchain-Powered Relationship Registry & Love A.I. Restoring Trust & Transparency in the Love Industry White Paper V250418 CONTENTS Contents ........................................................................................................................................... ii Important Notice ............................................................................................................................... 3 Key Essentials .................................................................................................................................. 4 Abstract ............................................................................................................................................ 5 1. Background ............................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 Love & Relationships Challenges in the 21st Century .......................................................... 6 1.2 Big Spending on Dating and Relationships ......................................................................... 8 2. What is the Viola.AI ................................................................................................................... 9 2.1 Introducing the Viola.AI ....................................................................................................... 9 2.2 Core Objectives ................................................................................................................ 10 2.3 Core Capabilities
    [Show full text]
  • 7-A-Dyadic-Partner-Schema.Pdf
    Clinical Psychology Review 70 (2019) 13–25 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Clinical Psychology Review journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/clinpsychrev Review A dyadic partner-schema model of relationship distress and depression: T Conceptual integration of interpersonal theory and cognitive-behavioral models ⁎ Jesse Lee Wilde, David J.A. Dozois Department of Psychology, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada HIGHLIGHTS • Presents a new theoretical framework – the dyadic partner-schema model of depression • Partner-schema structures affect biased cognitions about one's partner, which lead to maladaptive interpersonal behaviors • Reviews theoretical and empirical support for the model's proposed processes • Discusses implications for research and clinical applications ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Difficulties in romantic relationships are a prominent part of the disorder for many individuals with depression. Depression Researchers have called for an integration of interpersonal and cognitive-behavioral theories to better under- Interpersonal difficulties stand the role of relational difficulties in depression. In this article, a novel theoretical framework (the dyadic Partner-schemas partner-schema model) is presented. This model illustrates a potential pathway from underlying “partner- Romantic relationships schema” structures to romantic relationship distress and depressive affect. This framework integrates cognitive- Schema behavioral mechanisms in depression with research on dyadic processes in romantic
    [Show full text]
  • Communication Studies About Sex: Implications for Relationships, Health, Culture, and Identity
    Communication studies about sex: Implications for relationships, health, culture, and identity. A review Jimmie Manning Nota: Este artículo se puede leer en español en: http://www.profesionaldelainformacion.com/contenidos/2021/ene/manning_espanol.pdf How to cite this article: Manning, Jimmie (2021). “Communication studies about sex: Implications for relationships, health, culture, and identity. A review”. Profesional de la información, v. 30, n. 1, e300114. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2021.ene.14 Invited manuscript received on February, 2nd 2020 Jimmie Manning https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3572-8005 University of Nevada School of Social Research & Justice Studies Communication Studies - Mail Stop 0229 1664 N. Virginia Ave. Reno, NV 89577 USA [email protected] Abstract This article features a review of communication scholarship about sex from the past two decades (2000-2020). A typo- graphic analysis of relevant research reveals 11 primary topic areas related to how interpersonal sexual communication is commonly researched in communication studies. Six of these topic areas are relationship-oriented in nature: flirting and initiation; pleasure and desire; sexual expectations; relational and sexual satisfaction; communication after sex; and negative aspects of sex and sexuality. Three of the topics are health-oriented in nature: sex education, especially in consideration of how parent-child talk happens in families; negotiation of safe sex practices; and sexual dysfunction. Finally, two of the topics are cultural in nature: social factors and influences; and media influences and representations. Scholarship is also reviewed in terms of theoretical commitments, with most research following sociopsychological or critical traditions but with a noteworthy number also embracing sociocultural or biological paradigms.
    [Show full text]
  • 9781412929998.Pdf
    Duck-3494-Prelims.qxd 1/16/2007 10:39 AM Page i Human Relationships Duck-3494-Prelims.qxd 1/16/2007 10:39 AM Page ii Duck-3494-Prelims.qxd 1/16/2007 10:39 AM Page iii Human Relationships 4th Edition Steve Duck Duck-3494-Prelims.qxd 1/16/2007 10:39 AM Page iv © Steve Duck 2007 First published 2007 Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research or private study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, this publication may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form, or by any means, only with the prior permission in writing of the publishers, or in the case of reprographic reproduction, in accordance with the terms of licences issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside those terms should be sent to the publishers. SAGE Publications Ltd 1 Oliver’s Yard 55 City Road London EC1Y 1SP SAGE Publications Inc. 2455 Teller Road Thousand Oaks, California 91320 SAGE Publications India Pvt Ltd B 1/I 1 Mohan Cooperative Industrial Area Mathura Road, New Delhi 110 044 India SAGE Publications Asia-Pacific Pte Ltd 33 Pekin Street #02-01 Far East Square Singapore 048763 British Library Cataloguing in Publication data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 978-1-4129-2998-1 ISBN 978-1-4129-2999-8 (pbk) Library of Congress Control Number: 2006929060 Typeset by C&M Digitals (P) Ltd, Chennai, India Printed in Great Britain by The Alden Press, Witney Printed on paper from sustainable resources Duck-3494-Prelims.qxd 1/16/2007
    [Show full text]
  • UNCOUPLED How Our Singles Are Reshaping Jewish Engagement
    UNCOUPLED How our Singles are Reshaping Jewish Engagement STEVEN M. COHEN and ARI Y. KELMAN The Jewish Identity Project of Reboot Andrea and Charles Bronfman Philanthropies UNCOUPLED How our Singles are Reshaping Jewish Engagement STEVEN M. COHEN, Hebrew Union College – Jewish Institute of Religion and ARI Y. KELMAN, University of California at Davis The Jewish Identity Project of Reboot Andrea and Charles Bronfman Philanthropies www.acbp.net This report is the third in a series of studies. For more information, please visit www.acbp.net/About/publications.php and be in touch with any feedback at [email protected]. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We gratefully acknowledge friends and colleagues whose insights have contributed to this study. Reports like this one experience several iterations as ideas, information and style evolve; and with each pair of eyes and set of comments, the final project improves. For their generosity, support and critical perspectives, we want to thank Marion Blumenthal, Sharna Goldseker, Joel Perlmann, Rich Polt, Jeffrey Solomon, Dana Ferine, and, in particular, Roger Bennett. All provided detailed and valuable feedback on prior versions of this study. We also thank Marco and Anne Cibola of Nove Studio for their design work. 3 OVERVIEW At first glance, most young adult, non- they are unconnected to organized Jewry – Orthodox Jews in America seem rather and the two phenomena are related. unengaged in Jewish life. This seems espe- As compared with the in-married (Jews cially true of single Jews between the ages married to other Jews), single Jews score of 25 and 39. Few of them join synagogues or sharply lower on measures of communal JCCs, even fewer contribute to Jewish feder- affiliation and ritual observance.
    [Show full text]
  • Don't Ask, Must Tell—And Other Combinations
    University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship 2015 Don't Ask, Must Tell—and Other Combinations Adam M. Samaha Lior Strahilevitz Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/journal_articles Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Adam Samaha & Lior Strahilevitz, "Don't Ask, Must Tell—and Other Combinations," 103 California Law Review 919 (2015). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Don't Ask, Must Tell- And Other Combinations Adam M. Samaha* & Lior Jacob Strahilevitz** The military's defunct Don't Ask, Don't Tell policy has been studied and debatedfor decades. Surprisingly, the question of why a legal regime would combine these particular rules for information flow has received little attention. More surprisingly still, legal scholars have provided no systemic account of why law might prohibit or mandate asking and telling. While there is a large literature on disclosure and a fragmented literature on questioning, considering either part of the information dissemination puzzle in isolation has caused scholars to overlook key considerations. This Article tackles foundational issues of information policy and legal design, focusing on instances in which asking and telling are either mandated or prohibited by legal rules, legal incentives, or social norms. Although permissive norms for asking and telling seem pervasive in law, the Article shows that each corner solution exists in the American legal system.
    [Show full text]
  • You Did What? the Relationship Between Forgiveness Tendency, Communication of Forgiveness, and Relationship Satisfaction in Married and Dating Couples
    Communication Reports ISSN: 0893-4215 (Print) 1745-1043 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rcrs20 You Did What? The Relationship Between Forgiveness Tendency, Communication of Forgiveness, and Relationship Satisfaction in Married and Dating Couples Pavica Sheldon , Eletra Gilchrist-Petty & James Adam Lessley To cite this article: Pavica Sheldon , Eletra Gilchrist-Petty & James Adam Lessley (2014) You Did What? The Relationship Between Forgiveness Tendency, Communication of Forgiveness, and Relationship Satisfaction in Married and Dating Couples, Communication Reports, 27:2, 78-90, DOI: 10.1080/08934215.2014.902486 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2014.902486 Published online: 06 Aug 2014. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 738 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rcrs20 Download by: [Universita Studi la Sapienza] Date: 02 February 2017, At: 05:16 Communication Reports Vol. 27, No. 2, July–December 2014, pp. 78–90 You Did What? The Relationship Between Forgiveness Tendency, Communication of Forgiveness, and Relationship Satisfaction in Married and Dating Couples Pavica Sheldon, Eletra Gilchrist-Petty, & James Adam Lessley Willingness to forgive is one of the most important factors contributing to healing and restoring damaged relationships. Although recent studies have emphasized the link between forgiveness and positive communication, this is among the first studies to exam- ine how tendency to forgive influences the strategies married and dating couples use to communicate forgiveness to each other. According to the Vulnerability-Stress-Adaptation model, links among vulnerabilities, stressors, and behaviors lead to changes in marital satisfaction and stability.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Relational Transgressions As Revealed on Facebook: the Influence of Dependence Power on Verbal Versus Nonverbal Responses
    J Nonverbal Behav (2014) 38:477–493 DOI 10.1007/s10919-014-0197-x ORIGINAL PAPER Managing Relational Transgressions as Revealed on Facebook: The Influence of Dependence Power on Verbal Versus Nonverbal Responses Jennifer A. Samp • Caren E. Palevitz Published online: 9 August 2014 Ó Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014 Abstract Dependence power is defined by the control a less dependent partner is per- ceived to have by the more dependent individual in a close relationship. Guided by assumptions about dependence power, we examined how individuals manage perceived relational transgressions by partners on Facebook, distinguishing between face-to-face responses versus those that are expressed nonverbally (through monitoring or maintenance behaviors) on the site. Participants included 290 females and 210 males in a dating rela- tionship who completed measures of dependence power and Facebook use. Participants then viewed a screenshot reflecting a hypothetical Facebook partner transgression that varied by potential threat (high versus low). Finally, participants completed measures of perceived threat and a measure of responses to the transgression (monitoring and main- tenance). Dependence power was associated with perceptions of the threat of a trans- gression, the likelihood of confronting a partner face-to-face about the perceived transgression, and engaging in Facebook monitoring behavior after a perceived trans- gression. Dependence power was not significantly associated with maintenance responses. Keywords Social networking sites Á Relational transgressions Á Power Introduction The rise in the accessibility of social networking sites (SNS) such as Facebook has advanced the processes of relational initiation, maintenance, and monitoring efforts into the electronic sphere (Baym 2010; Bryant et al.
    [Show full text]
  • I, Too, Am a Woman: an Emancipatory Text on the Intersections of Race, Gender, and Sexuality
    Georgia Southern University Digital Commons@Georgia Southern Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies, Jack N. Averitt College of Spring 2018 I, Too, Am a Woman: an Emancipatory Text on the Intersections of Race, Gender, and Sexuality Michelle M. Allen Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd Part of the Adult and Continuing Education Commons, Bilingual, Multilingual, and Multicultural Education Commons, Curriculum and Social Inquiry Commons, Gender and Sexuality Commons, Gender Equity in Education Commons, Inequality and Stratification Commons, Liberal Studies Commons, Race and Ethnicity Commons, and the Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Allen, Michelle M., "I, Too, Am a Woman: an Emancipatory Text on the Intersections of Race, Gender, and Sexuality" (2018). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 1764. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd/1764 This dissertation (open access) is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies, Jack N. Averitt College of at Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. For more information, please contact [email protected]. I, TOO, AM A WOMAN: AN EMANCIPATORY TEXT ON THE INTERSECTIONS OF RACE, GENDER, AND SEXUALITY by MICHELLE ALLEN (Under the Direction of Sabrina Ross) ABSTRACT This inquiry builds upon Black Feminism and Critical Race Feminist frameworks by exploring the juxtaposition between Black Women and Queer Black Women. It is also an exploration of the similarities between Queer Black Women and Black Women and how they interact with femininity and masculinity, patriarchy, and heteronormativity. Claiming digital space through podcasting, it honors the power of counter narratives by employing autoethnographical story telling.
    [Show full text]