DOCSLIB.ORG

Sydney Light Rail Extension Stage 1 Heritage Impact Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sydney Light Rail Extension Stage 1 Heritage Impact Assessment Transport NSW SYDNEY LIGHT RAIL EXTENSION STAGE 1 – INNER WEST EXTENSION 2106703 2106703 OCTOBER 2010 2010 OCTOBER Volume 2 - Technical Reports TECHNICAL PAPER 3 HERITAGE Sydney Light Rail Extension Stage 1 Heritage Impact Assessment Prepared by Australian Museum Business Services for Parsons Brinckerhoff September 2010 100510 Australian Museum Business Services - 6 College Street, Sydney NSW 2010, Ph (02) 9320 6311, Fax (02) 9320 6428 australianmuseum.net.au/AMBS [email protected] Sydney Light Rail Extension Stage 1 – Heritage Impact Assessment Document Information 100510 AMBS 2010 Sydney Light Rail Extension Stage 1 – Heritage Impact Citation: Assessment Version 1: Draft Report issued August 2010 Version 2: Draft Report issued August 2010 Versions: Version 3: Draft Report issued September 2010 Version 4: Final Report issued September 2010 Emma Dean Recipient: Environmental Scientist, Parsons Brinckerhoff Approved by: Jennie Lindbergh II Sydney Light Rail Extension Stage 1 – Heritage Impact Assessment Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Preamble ................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1.1 Background ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Study Area .............................................................................................................................. 2 1.3 Methodology .......................................................................................................................... 9 1.3.1 Aboriginal Consultation .................................................................................................... 9 1.4 Authorship & Acknowledgements ......................................................................................... 10 2 Statutory Context ...................................................................................... 11 2.1 Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 ......................................... 11 2.2 National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 ................................................................................... 11 2.3 The Heritage Act 1977.......................................................................................................... 12 2.3.1 RailCorp Heritage and Conservation Register (Section 170 Register) .................................. 15 2.3.2 Sydney Water Corporation Heritage and Conservation Register .......................................... 15 2.3.3 NSW Roads and Traffic Authority Heritage and Conservation Register .............................. 15 2.3.4 NSW Department of Education & Training Heritage and Conservation Register ................ 15 2.4 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act (1979) ............................................................. 16 2.4.1 State Environmental Planning Policy (Infrastructure) 2007 .............................................. 16 2.4.2 Leichhardt Local Environmental Plan 2000 ..................................................................... 17 2.4.3 Ashfield Local Environmental Plan 1985 ......................................................................... 17 2.4.4 Marrickville Local Environmental Plan 2001................................................................... 18 2.4.5 City West Sydney Regional Environmental Plan No. 26 .................................................... 19 2.5 National Trust of Australia (NSW) ....................................................................................... 20 2.6 Summary of Identified Historic Heritage Items ..................................................................... 22 3 Aboriginal Context ................................................................................... 31 3.1 Environmental Context ......................................................................................................... 31 3.1.1 Topography, Geology and Soils ......................................................................................... 31 3.1.2 Hydrology and Drainage ................................................................................................. 33 3.1.3 Vegetation ...................................................................................................................... 34 3.1.4 Land Use and Disturbance .............................................................................................. 34 3.2 Aboriginal Archaeological Context ........................................................................................ 35 3.2.1 Regional Archaeological Context ....................................................................................... 35 3.2.2 Local Archaeological Context ........................................................................................... 37 3.3 Aboriginal Heritage Site Prediction Modelling ...................................................................... 38 4 Thematic History ........................................................................................ 41 4.1 Background ........................................................................................................................... 41 4.2 Development of Transport Systems ....................................................................................... 41 4.2.1 Parramatta Road ............................................................................................................ 41 4.2.2 The Great Southern and Western Suburban Railway ........................................................ 41 4.2.3 Railway Electrification .................................................................................................... 42 4.2.4 The Rozelle Goods Line ................................................................................................... 43 4.2.5 Associated Industries and Infrastructure ............................................................................ 45 4.2.6 Hawthorne Canal ........................................................................................................... 46 4.2.7 Sydney Water Pressure Tunnel ......................................................................................... 47 4.2.8 Lewisham Sewage Aqueduct ............................................................................................ 48 4.2.9 Rail Bridges .................................................................................................................... 48 4.2.10 Road Bridges ................................................................................................................... 51 4.2.11 The Haberfield and Lewisham Urban Conservation Areas ................................................. 53 4.3 Discussion ............................................................................................................................. 55 5 Physical Analysis & Impact Assessment ................................................. 56 III Sydney Light Rail Extension Stage 1 – Heritage Impact Assessment 5.1 Aboriginal Heritage ............................................................................................................... 56 5.1.1 Survey Methodology ........................................................................................................ 56 5.1.2 Survey Results ................................................................................................................. 56 5.2 Historic Heritage .................................................................................................................. 59 5.2.1 Section 1 ........................................................................................................................ 60 5.2.2 Section 2 ........................................................................................................................ 64 5.2.3 Section 3 ........................................................................................................................ 68 5.2.4 Section 4 ........................................................................................................................ 77 5.2.5 Section 5 ........................................................................................................................ 82 5.3 Summary of Historic Heritage Impacts ................................................................................. 85 6 Mitigation ................................................................................................... 88 6.1 Aboriginal Heritage ............................................................................................................... 88 6.2 Historic Heritage .................................................................................................................. 88 6.2.1 Hawthorne Canal, Battle Bridge and Parramatta Road Underbridge, Lewisham ................ 89 6.2.2 Lewisham Railway Viaducts over Long Cove Creek and Lewisham Sewage Aqueduct .......... 89 6.2.3 Rail Stops, Bridges and Landscaping ................................................................................. 90 6.2.4 Excavations .................................................................................................................... 91 6.2.5 Effects of Vibration ......................................................................................................... 92
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Figure S1: Map of Sydney Harbour and the Position of the Hawkesbury and Georges Rivers
    10.1071/MF09263_AC © CSIRO 2010 Marine and Freshwater Research 2010, 61(10), 1109–1122 Figure S1: Map of Sydney Harbour and the position of the Hawkesbury and Georges Rivers. Circles and diamonds indicate locations sampled in the Parramatta and Lane Cover Rivers, respectively. Running east to west, the locations within the Parramatta River were: Iron Cove (33°52'14"S 151° 9'2"E), Five Dock Bay (33°51'10"S 151° 8'32"E), Hen and Chicken Bay (33°51'37"S 151° 7'7"E), Morrisons Bay (33°49'49"S 151° 6'43"E), Majors Bay (33°50'33"S 151° 6'4"E), Brays Bay (33°49'53"S 151° 5'33"E) and Duck Creek (33°49'49"S 151° 6'4"E). Running north to south, the locations within the Lane Cove river were: Field of Mars (33°49'3"S 151° 8'35"E), Boronia Park (33°49'37"S 151° 8'38"E), Tambourine Bay (33°49'43"S 151° 9'40"E) and Woodford Bay (33°49'51"S 151°10'24"E). The coordinates for the locations within the other estuaries were: Hawkesbury River (Cogra Bay 33°31'23"S 151°13'23"E; Porto Bay Bay 33°33'51"S 151°13'17"E) and Georges River (Kyle Bay 33°59'28"S 151° 6'8"E and Coronation Bay 33°59'54"S 151° 4'38"E). 10.1071/MF09263_AC © CSIRO 2010 Marine and Freshwater Research 2010, 61(10), 1109–1122 Table S1. Organic contaminants analysed in sediments Class LOD, mg/kg Method Specific chemicals or fractions Polycyclic aromatic 0.01 USEPA methods Naphthalene, acenaphthylene, acenaphthene, fluorene, hydrocarbons (PAHs) 3550/8270 phenanthrene, anthracene, fluoranthene, pyrene, benz(a)anthracene, chrysene, benzo(b)-fluoranthene, benzo(k)-fluoranthene, benzo(a)pyrene, indeno(1,2,3- cd)pyrene, dibenz(ah)anthracene, and benzo(ghi)perylene).
    [Show full text]
  • Sydney Water in 1788 Was the Little Stream That Wound Its Way from Near a Day Tour of the Water Supply Hyde Park Through the Centre of the Town Into Sydney Cove
    In the beginning Sydney’s first water supply from the time of its settlement Sydney Water in 1788 was the little stream that wound its way from near A day tour of the water supply Hyde Park through the centre of the town into Sydney Cove. It became known as the Tank Stream. By 1811 it dams south of Sydney was hardly fit for drinking. Water was then drawn from wells or carted from a creek running into Rushcutter’s Bay. The Tank Stream was still the main water supply until 1826. In this whole-day tour by car you will see the major dams, canals and pipelines that provide water to Sydney. Some of these works still in use were built around 1880. The round trip tour from Sydney is around 350 km., all on good roads and motorway. The tour is through attractive countryside south Engines at Botany Pumping Station (demolished) of Sydney, and there are good picnic areas and playgrounds at the dam sites. source of supply. In 1854 work started on the Botany Swamps Scheme, which began to deliver water in 1858. The Scheme included a series of dams feeding a pumping station near the present Sydney Airport. A few fragments of the pumping station building remain and can be seen Tank stream in 1840, from a water-colour by beside General Holmes Drive. Water was pumped to two J. Skinner Prout reservoirs, at Crown Street (still in use) and Paddington (not in use though its remains still exist). The ponds known as Lachlan Swamp (now Centennial Park) only 3 km.
    [Show full text]
  • Including the Upper Nepean Scheme), at Which Time It Was Used Only to Flush Creeks and Ponds 14 in the Botanic Gardens.13F13F
    by 1890 (including the Upper Nepean Scheme), at which time it was used only to flush creeks and ponds 14 in the Botanic Gardens.13F13F FIGURE 6: WOOLCOTT & CLARKE’S MAP OF THE CITY OF SYDNEY, 1864 (SOURCE: HISTORICAL ATLAS OF SYDNEY) FIGURE 7: BUSBY’S BORE ACROSS HYDE PARK, FINAL FLOW OF WATER ACROSS TRESTLES, TO BE COLLECTED AND DISTRIBUTED BY HORSE DRAWN CART (SOURCE: CITY OF SYDNEY ARCHIVES, CALL NUMBER: SSV1 / WAT) 14 ibid Archaeological Assessment—Sydney Football Stadium Prepared by Curio Projects for Infrastructure NSW 25 FIGURE 8: SECTION OF BUSBY’S BORE NEAR INTERSECTION OF LIVERPOOL AND COLLEGE STREETS, THIS SECTION OF THE BORE WAS CONSTRUCTED AS AN OPEN CUT TRENCH, LAID WITH SANDSTONE MASONRY AND SLAB ROOF (SOURCE: SYDNEY WATER ARCHIVES, REF: A1029) FIGURE 9: BUSBY’S BORE ACCESS POINT AT VICTORIA BARRACKS, PADDINGTON (SOURCE: CITY OF SYDNEY ARCHIVES, FILE. 029\029322) Archaeological Assessment—Sydney Football Stadium Prepared by Curio Projects for Infrastructure NSW 26 FIGURE 10: ORIGINAL 1892 PLAN OF BUSBY’S BORE (N.B. THIS MAP HAS BEEN PROVEN TO HAVE MANY LOCATIONAL INACCURACIES) (SOURCE: SYDNEY WATER ARCHIVES, REF: A1029) 3.4. Rifle Range and Moore Park Following the establishment and completion of construction of the Victoria Park Barracks, it became apparent that additional land was required for both a rifle range, as well as recreational facilities for the troops. Thus in 1849, additional land from the Sydney Common was set aside for a professional military rifle range (Figure 11), followed in 1852 by an additional 25 acres for a ‘military garden and cricket 15 ground’14F14F (the location of which eventually became the Sydney Cricket Ground).
    [Show full text]
  • Lane Cove River Coastal Zone Management Plan
    A part of BMT in Energy and Environment "Where will our knowledge take you?" Lane Cove River Coastal Zone Management Plan Offices Prepared For: Lane Cove River Estuary Management Committee Brisbane (LCREMC), Hunters Hill Council, Lane Cove Council, Denver City of Ryde, Willoughby Councli Mackay Melbourne Newcastle Perth Prepared By: BMT WBM Pty Ltd (Member of the BMT group of Sydney companies) Vancouver Acknowledgement: LCREMC has prepared this document with financial assistance from the NSW Government through the Office of Environment and Heritage. This document does not necessarily represent the opinion of the NSW Government or the Office of Environment and Heritage. lANE COVE RIVER CZMP FINAL DRAFT DOCUMENT CONTROL SHEET BMT WBM Pty Ltd Document : Lane Cove River CZMP FINAL BMT WBM Pty Ltd DRAFT Level 1, 256-258 Norton Street PO Box 194 Project Manager : Reid Butler LEICHHARDT NSW 2040 Australia Client : Lane Cove River Estuary Management Committee, Hunters Tel: +61 2 8987 2900 Hill Council, Lane Cove Council, Fax: +61 2 8987 2999 City of Ryde, Willoughby Council ABN 54 010 830 421 www.bmtwbm.com.au Client Contact: Susan Butler (Lane Cove Council) Client Reference: Lane Cove River CZMP Title : Lane Cove River Coastal Zone Management Plan Author/s : Reid Butler, Smita Jha Synopsis : This report provides a revised management plan for the Lane Cove River Estuary under the requirements of the NSW OEH Coastal Zone Management Planning Guidelines. REVISION/CHECKING HISTORY REVISION DATE OF ISSUE CHECKED BY ISSUED BY NUMBER 0 24/05/2012 SJ
    [Show full text]
  • Lane Cover River Estuary – Understanding the Resource
    Response to request for Quotation No: COR-RFQ-21/07 Provision of Consultancy Services to Prepare a Community Education Program: Lane Cover River Estuary – Understanding the Resource This is Our Place and a River runs through it "Just as the key to a species' survival in the natural world is its ability to adapt to local habitats, so the key to human survival will probably be the local community. If we can create vibrant, increasingly autonomous and self-reliant local groupings of people that emphasise sharing, cooperation and living lightly on the Earth, we can avoid the fate warned of by Rachel Carson and the world scientists and restore the sacred balance of life.1" 1 David Suzuki. The Sacred Balance (1997) Allen & Unwin p.8 The TITC Partnership see this quote from David Suzuki as the basis for our work on this project. 2008_02_15_Response to RFQ_Ryde_final Page 1 of 33 CONTENTS The Project Team TITC Partnership........................................................................................................... 3 Understanding of Scope of Works ................................................................................................................. 4 Program Objectives................................................................................................................................... 4 Proposed Package Elements .................................................................................................................... 4 The Catchment Community......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Biota of the Hawkesbury-Nepean Catchment: Reconstruction and Restoration
    The biota of the Hawkesbury-Nepean catchment: reconstruction and restoration 1 2 H. F. Rccher , P. A. Hutchings and S. Rosen:i 1Dcpal'liiiCIII of EcosystCIII Ma n <~g t : nt C i ll , nivcrsity or New En ~ l ttnd, Allllidalc. N ·w 215 1 1Ausmdinn M u ~~-, ,n, P.O. !lox A2M5, Sydney South, NSW 1!000 ''~h 1 e Rn s ~;>n Pty Ltd, l ii~tol' inn and l ltt·it,lgc Consultam, 7GA Ct~rling l m ·d Road, Epping, SW 2 121 ABSTRACT Despite 200 years of European settlement, the Hawkesbury·Nepe<~n catchment sustains a rich and diverse fauna. This Is a consequence or extensive sandstone envlronmenls largely unsuited for development that escaped the elctenslve habitat modifications affecting the rau ha or the grassy wood­ lands on the Cumberland Plain and Southern Tablelands, The most slgnJUcant Impacts followed the clearing and fragmenta tion or the vegetation lor agriculture. Changed fire regimes, the naturallt<ltion or exotic plants and animals, and disease were also factors In the decline of native birds aod mammals. Data on frogs and reptiles are limited, but some reptiles have declined In abundance In assoclallon with the loss ot habitats. Not all native species have been adversely arrected by European settlement and a number of birds have Increased In abundance and extended their range within the catchment. Agricultural clearing and urban development have also affected aquatic ecosystems. The pre· European environment was apparently characterised by creek and river systems subjected to periodic floods, but with clear water. low nutrient levels, and clean sandy or rocky substrates.
    [Show full text]
  • L a N E C O V E N O R
    LANE COVE NORTH Welcome to your new home... and LANE COVE NORTH everything beyond. Artist impression Design that resonates. Find serenity in the city in a place that echoes all of Lane Cove’s diverse charms. As you journey through the building – from its luxurious apartments to its rooftop retreat – you’ll find a home where architecture, nature and stylish village living are in perfect harmony. Calm your mind on Echo’s crowning gardens where elevated views take in the suburb’s leafy canopies to the district beyond. Find space to gather over a barbecue, relax under the pergola, or simply retreat in tranquil surrounds. Echo is where nature’s inspiration brings a fresh new dimension to sought-after Lane Cove living. This is your sanctuary away from the daily bustle, but with metropolitan Sydney always within reach. Artist impression INSIDE Spaces that mirror your way of life. Flowing interiors and seamless indoor- outdoor living combine to create an irresistible home. Elegant timber floor tiles enhance the natural mood while expansive sliding glass doors open up to admit plentiful sunshine and summer breezes. Artist impression INSIDE OUTSIDE Artist impression HOME LIFE Inspired by today’s relaxed natural moods. A home with space to spend time outdoors, to entertain, and enjoy the rhythm of family life. Echo’s boutique living environments inspire calm and bring delight in every moment of the day. You’ll love the emphasis on intelligent spatial design, detail and finishes, and reverse cycle air conditioning that works to enhance the experience of living here. Layouts are designed with flow and easy living top of mind.
    [Show full text]
  • INTEGRATED MONITORING PROGRAM for the Hawkesbury-Nepean, Shoalhaven and Woronora River Systems
    HAWKESBURY NEPEAN RIVER MANAGEMENT FORUM INTEGRATED MONITORING PROGRAM for the Hawkesbury-Nepean, Shoalhaven and Woronora River Systems PREPARED BY Independent Expert Panel on Environmental Flows for the Hawkesbury Nepean, Shoalhaven and Woronora Catchments April 2004 Independent Expert Panel Members Mr Robert Wilson BA (Hons), FCPA, MACS; Independent Chair Dr David Barnes, Sinclair Knight Merz Pty. Ltd.; Bulk water and sewerage systems Dr.Keith Bishop, Freshwater Biology Consultant; Fish ecology Dr Tony Church, Sinclair Knight Merz Pty. Ltd.; Water quality Dr Ivor Growns, Department of Infrastructure, Planning and Natural Resources; Macroinvertebrate ecology Dr Eleni Taylor-Wood, Biosis Research Pty. Ltd.; In-stream and riparian vegetation Mr Ian Varley, SMEC Australia; Hydrology Dr Robin Warner, Environmental Geomorphologist; Geomorphology Dr Stuart White, Institute for Sustainable Futures; Resource economics and socio-economic assessment The Expert Panel acknowledges the support and expertise provided by associated advisers. Illustrations Conceptual model diagrams; Ros Dare, Sinclair Knight Merz Pty. Ltd Ecological processes (Plates 1 to 7); Robbie Charles Bishop-Taylor EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The New South Wales (NSW) Government established the Hawkesbury-Nepean Management Forum (Forum) to make recommendations on an environmental flow regime for the Hawkesbury-Nepean River that would incorporate the maintenance of or improvement in environmental, social and economic conditions. The establishment of the Forum arose out of the Council of Australian Governments’ Water Reform Framework of 1994 and the NSW Government’s Water Reforms of 1997. To assist the NSW government and the Forum, the NSW government appointed the Independent Expert Panel on Environmental Flows for the Hawkesbury-Nepean, Shoalhaven and Woronora Rivers (Panel). To guide the Forum’s work plan and the work of the Panel, environmental, socio-economic, and cultural objectives were established.
    [Show full text]
  • Soft Sediment Macrophytes General Introduction and Context
    Soft Sediment Macrophytes General Introduction and Context Estuaries contribute US$7.9 trillion annually to the The NSW Government has undertaken mapping global economy (Costanza et al., 1998). Much of of sub-tidal macrophytes in Sydney Harbour using this wealth can directly or indirectly attributed to aerial photographs. Mangroves and saltmarsh are estuarine flora. In estuaries, the main vegetation restricted to intertidal regions in Lane Cove River, types are seagrasses (worth AUS$19,000 ha.yr−1), Middle Harbour, and Parramatta River. saltmarsh and mangroves (AUS$9,990 ha.yr−1 combined; Costanza et al., 1998)). These three Saltmarsh has declined in Sydney Harbour and less habitats support the ecological and economic wealth than 37.5 ha remain. Of the 757 patches of saltmarsh 2 of Australia’s productive estuarine ecosystems. In remaining, most are small (< 100 m ) and isolated. this section of the report we deal with seagrasses, Mangroves have become more common in Sydney mangroves and saltmarsh collectively. However, it is Harbour. Over 184 ha have been observed in the important to note that the three floral types are not Harbour, despite being relatively uncommon prior to without significant differences in ecology. the 1870’s. Seagrasses are the only estuarine plants that can live totally submerged in oceanic water. While not truly grasses (i.e. not in the family Poceae), they are angiosperms (flowering plants). The term seagrass itself refers to a taxonomic grouping with much convergent morphology (Connell and Gillanders, 2007). Like most angiosperms, seagrass roots provide a mechanism for nutrient uptake. Unlike many terrestrial plants, however, a complex rhizome system linking individual shoots across several square km provides much of the structural support needed in high energy submerged environments.
    [Show full text]
  • 15188-1 Alfred Street-Structural Report-CBDRL and Tank Stream 150709
    © Sydney Water Corporation Limited ACN 063 279 649 PO Box A53 Sydney South NSW 1232 Phone (02) 9350 6969 Commercial in Confidence This report and the information, ideas, concepts, methodologies, technologies and other material it contains remain the intellectual property of Sydney Water, unless otherwise agreed. Front Cover Images: Above - Tank Stream Water Colour by F Garling 1842, State Library of NSW ML420 Below – Tank Stream Tunnel 2002, Sydney Water June 2003 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Conservation Management Plans (CMPs) determine the significance of a heritage item and recommend appropriate conservation and management policies. They are prepared to set guidelines and standards, and establish significance through investigation of the historical development of an item, using documentary, pictorial, oral and physical evidence. In NSW CMPs for places of state heritage significance have a legal status that is binding upon the owner of the heritage item. This CMP has been prepared in conformity with best practice guidelines. The first section is descriptive and culminates in the statement of significance. This is followed by the development of recommended policies and actions to direct future conservation and management. Why is the Tank Stream important? The presence of the Tank Stream determined the placement of the settlement established by the arrival of the First Fleet in 1788, and its fresh water helped ensure the colony’s survival. It is therefore intimately associated with the earliest moments of the European presence in Australia. As a result of that association, the Tank Stream has a symbolic value to the Australian community and this is reflected in a high recognition and interest in it as a heritage item.
    [Show full text]
  • Saltmarsh Rehabilitation Projects Review of Grey Literature
    Saltmarsh Rehabilitation Projects Review – Jon Knight Saltmarsh Rehabilitation Projects Review of Grey Literature Dr Jon Knight Prepared for the Saltmarsh for Life Committee, Healthy Land and Water, Brisbane May 2018 (Image: Bank erosion along Brisbane River causing loss of saltmarsh – Myrtletown 3rd May 2017. Photo JM Knight Page 1 of 105 Saltmarsh Rehabilitation Projects Review – Jon Knight Cite as: Knight, J. (2018). Review of Saltmarsh Rehabilitation Projects. Saltmarsh for Life Committee, Healthy Land and Water, Brisbane. 105pp. Report accepted May 2018 Acknowledgements The review was funded by the Gold Coast Waterways Authority (50%) and by Redland City Council, Moreton Bay Regional Council and Gold Coast City Council with support from Healthy Land and Water, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute and Griffith University. I am very grateful to many, many people for their contributions. Thank you for your assistance by providing documentation, information, suggestions and access to your networks. Because of your contributions the number of projects identified vastly exceeded my expectations. I thank Patrick Dwyer (DPI Fisheries, NSW), Emeritus Professor Pat Dale (GU), Cheryl Bolzenius and Karen Toms (HLW) and Ralph Dowling (Queensland Herbarium), for reviewing the draft and providing feedback and suggestions. I also thank Dr Cameron Webb (USyd) for hosting me on a tour of many of Sydney’s saltmarsh rehabilitation sites; Karen Toms (HLW) with B4C for hosting a tour of SEQ saltmarsh rehabilitation sites; and Ralph Dowling for organising a visit to the Coomera Waters saltmarsh rehabilitation site. Page 2 of 105 Saltmarsh Rehabilitation Projects Review – Jon Knight Executive Summary This review was prepared for the Saltmarsh for Life Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • C H a I N M a I L [email protected] No
    c h a i n m a i l http://www.bikenorth.org.au/ [email protected] No. 35 August 2004 Contents M2 Cyclist Issues UPDATE! M2 Cyclist Issues UPDATE! 1 Doug Stewart Events 2 In the last Chain Mail we reported that the M2 operators has raised some safety concerns and Diary Dates 2 that Bike North was preparing a submission. Further information gathered since then suggests Bike North AGM & Picnic 2 Bike North may need to put together a strong argument to keep the M2 as a direct and quick commuter and training route for local cyclists. Touring / Riding 3 The Ryde Council Bicycle Advisory Committee recently met with reps from the Hills motorway A Tale of Two Canals (and One Reservoir)Chain 3 and consultants Mail GHD, whose plans to make changes to the M2 seem well advanced. Spoke-n 4 WHY ARE CHANGES BEING PLANNED? A Blitz Of Young Blades 4 The pressure for change is from new roads developing to the east (Lane Cove Tunnel) and the Chatswood to surf and west (M7 and M2 to F3 link) which create the opportunity for more vehicles on the M2, and not quite back again. 4 therefore more revenue for the company. Cycling for transport 5 The current chokepoint in the morning peak is the toll plaza. The M2 is working to install Murphy, the law, and our lore 5 improved technology allowing for faster E-Tag recognition and distance based tolls may be considered as well. The legal side 6 With toll Bike Bits 6 collection solved Crank Rites 6 the next issue is BN Member Product Review 7 vehicle capacity.
    [Show full text]