DOCSLIB.ORG

University of Copenhagen

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
University of Copenhagen Drivers of forests and tree-based systems for food security and nutrition Kleinschmit, Daniela ; Sijapati Basnett, Bimbika ; Martin, Adrian; Rai, Nitin D.; Smith-Hall, Carsten; Dawson, Neil M.; Hickey, Gordon; Neufeldt, Henry; Ojha, Hemant R. ; Walelign, Solomon Zena Published in: Forests, trees and landscapes for food security and nutrition Publication date: 2015 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Citation for published version (APA): Kleinschmit, D., Sijapati Basnett, B., Martin, A., Rai, N. D., Smith-Hall, C., Dawson, N. M., Hickey, G., Neufeldt, H., Ojha, H. R., & Walelign, S. Z. (2015). Drivers of forests and tree-based systems for food security and nutrition. In B. Vira, C. Wildburger, & S. Mansourian (Eds.), Forests, trees and landscapes for food security and nutrition: a global assessment report (pp. 87-110). International Union of Forest Research Organizations (IUFRO). IUFRO world series Vol. 33 http://www.iufro.org/fileadmin/material/publications/iufro- series/ws33/ws33.pdf Download date: 27. sep.. 2021 IUFRO World Series Volume 33 Volume Series World IUFRO IUFRO World Series Volume 33 – Forests, Trees and Landscapes for Food Security and Nutrition Food for and Landscapes Trees 33 – Forests, Volume Series World IUFRO Forests, Trees and Landscapes for Food Security and Nutrition A Global Assessment Report Editors: Bhaskar Vira, Christoph Wildburger, Stephanie Mansourian 2015 IUFRO World Series Vol. 33 Forests, Trees and Landscapes for Food Security and Nutrition A Global Assessment Report Editors: Bhaskar Vira, Christoph Wildburger, Stephanie Mansourian Funding support for this publication was provided by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Finland, the United States Forest Service, and the Austrian Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management. The views expressed within this publication do not necessarily reflect official policy of the governments represented by these institutions. Publisher: International Union of Forest Research Organizations (IUFRO) Recommended catalogue entry: Bhaskar Vira, Christoph Wildburger & Stephanie Mansourian (eds.), 2015. Forests, Trees and Landscapes for Food Security and Nutrition. A Global Assessment Report. IUFRO World Series Volume 33. Vienna. 172 p. ISBN 978-3-902762-40-5 ISSN 1016-3263 Published by: International Union of Forest Research Organizations (IUFRO) Available from: IUFRO Headquarters Secretariat Marxergasse 2 1030 Vienna Austria Tel: +43-1-877-0151-0 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.iufro.org Language editor: Stephanie Mansourian Layout: Schrägstrich Kommunikationsdesign Cover photographs: Terry Sunderland, Terry Sunderland, Miguel Pinedo-Vasquez Rightmost photograph originally published as fig. 4.6. in Parrotta and Trosper (2012). Reprinted with kind permission from Springer + Business Media B.V. Printed in Austria by Eigner Druck, Tullner Straße 311, 3040 Neulengbach Preface Connecting the dots ith the establishment of the Global Forest Expert Panels (GFEP) initiative in the year 2007, the Collabo- rative Partnership on Forests (CPF) created an international mechanism which effectively links scientific Wknowledge with political decision-making on forests. The GFEP responds directly to key forest-related policy questions by consolidating available scientific knowledge and expertise on these questions at a global level. It provides decision-makers with the most relevant, objective and accurate information, and thus makes an essential contribution to international forest governance. This report entitled “Forests, Trees and Landscapes for Food Security and Nutrition” presents the results of the fourth global scientific assessment undertaken so far in the framework of GFEP. Previous assessments addressed the adaptation of forests and people to climate change; international forest governance; and the relationship between biodiversity, carbon, forests and people. All assessment reports were prepared by internationally recognised scientists from a variety of biophysical and social science disciplines. They have all been presented to decision-makers across relevant inter- national policy fora. In this way, GFEP supports a more coherent policy dialogue about the role of forests in addressing broader environmental, social and economic challenges. The current report reflects the importance of policy coherence and integration more than any previous GFEP assessment. It comes at a time when the United Nations General Assembly seeks to adopt a set of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) which build upon the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and converge with the post-2015 development agenda. In this context, the eradication of hunger, realisation of food security and the improvement of nutrition are of particular relevance. By 2050, the international community will face the challenge of providing 9 billion people with food, shelter and energy. Despite impressive productivity increases, there is growing evidence that conventional agricultural strategies will fall short of eliminating global hunger and malnutrition. The assessment report in hand provides comprehensive scientific evidence on how forests, trees and landscapes can be – and must be - an integral part of the solution to this global problem. In other words, we must connect the dots and see the bigger picture. The review of the International Arrangement on Forests by the member states of the United Nations Forum on Forests provides a unique opportunity to integrate forests into the SDGs in a holistic manner and to promote synergies in the im- plementation of the post-2015 development agenda across multiple levels of governance. It is my hope that those with a responsibility for forests, food security and nutrition at all levels will find this report, and its accompanying policy brief, a useful source of information and inspiration. Alexander Buck IUFRO Executive Director 6 7 Acknowledgements This publication is the product of the collaborative work of scientific experts in the framework of the Global Forest Expert Panel on Forests and Food Security, who served in different capacities as panel members and authors. We express our sincere gratitude to all of them: Bina Agarwal, Sarah Ayeri Ogalleh, Frédéric Baudron, Sammy Carsan, Paolo Cerutti, Josephine Chambers, Ian K. Dawson, Neil M. Dawson, Beatrice Darko Obiri, Elizabeth Deakin, Ann Degrande, Jason Donovan, Jennie Dey de Pryck, Samson Foli, Lisa Fuchs, Amos Gyau, Gordon Hickey, Amy Ickowitz, Miyuki Iiyama, Ramni Jamnadass, Katy Jeary, Gudrun Keding, Katja Kehlenbeck, Daniela Kleinschmit, Christophe Kouame, Godwin Kowero, Patti Krist- janson, Adrian Martin, Stepha McMullin, Henry Neufeldt, Mary Njenga, Vincent O. Oeba, Daniel Ofori, Hemant R. Ohja, Pablo Pacheco, Christine Padoch, John A. Parrotta, Bronwen Powell, Nitin D. Rai, Patrick Ranjatson, James Reed, Mirjam Ros-Tonen, Chris Sandbrook, Jolien Schure, Anca Serban, Bimbika Sijapati Basnett, Carsten Smith- Hall, Barbara Stadlmayr, Terry Sunderland, Celine Termote, Tran Nam Tu, Patrick Van Damme, Nathalie van Vliet, Barbara Vinceti and Solomon Zena Walelign. Without their voluntary efforts and commitment the preparation of this publication would not have been possible. We acknowledge and sincerely thank the reviewers of the full report and the various chapters whose comments have greatly improved the quality of this publication: Eduardo Brondizio, Carol Colfer, Martina Kress, Eric Lambin, Kae Mihara, Sarah Milne, Ellen Muehlhoff, Ben Phalan, Dominique Reeb, Patricia Shanley and Ingrid Visseren-Hamakers. We also gratefully acknowledge the generous financial and in-kind support provided by the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland, the United States Forest Service, and the Austrian Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management. Our special thanks go to the IUFRO Secretariat for providing indispensable administrative and technical support to the work of the Panel. Furthermore, we would like to thank the member organisations of the Collaborative Partnership on Forests for providing overall guidance to the Panel. We are particularly grateful also to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO, Rome, Italy), to the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia), the University of Cambridge (UK) and to the World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF, Delhi, India) for hosting expert meetings. Bhaskar Vira Christoph Wildburger Stephanie Mansourian Panel Chair GFEP Coordinator Content Editor 8 9 Contents Preface 5 Acknowledgements 7 Acronyms, Units and Symbols 10 1 Introduction Forests, Trees and Landscapes for Food Security and Nutrition 13 Coordinating lead author: Bhaskar Vira Lead authors: Bina Agarwal, Ramni Jamnadass, Daniela Kleinschmit, Stepha McMullin, Stephanie Mansourian, Henry Neufeldt, John A. Parrotta, Terry Sunderland and Christoph Wildburger 2 Understanding the Roles of Forests and Tree-based Systems in Food Provision 25 Coordinating lead authors: Ramni Jamnadass and Stepha McMullin Lead authors: Miyuki Iiyama and Ian K. Dawson Contributing authors: Bronwen Powell, Celine Termote, Amy Ickowitz, Katja Kehlenbeck, Barbara Vinceti, Nathalie van Vliet, Gudrun Keding, Barbara Stadlmayr, Patrick Van Damme, Sammy Carsan, Terry Sunderland, Mary Njenga, Amos Gyau, Paolo Cerutti, Jolien Schure, Christophe Kouame, Beatrice Darko Obiri, Daniel Ofori, Bina Agarwal, Henry Neufeldt, Ann Degrande and Anca Serban 3 The Historical, Environmental and Socio-Economic Context of Forests and Tree-Based
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Unlocking Future Investments in Uganda's Commercial Forest Sector
    Uganda Unlocking future investments in Uganda’s commercial forest sector UNDERSTANDING THE IMPACTS OF TIMBER TRADE RESTRICTIONS ON THE PROFITABILITY OF PINE PLANTATION AND SAWMILL INVESTMENTS KEY MESSAGES EPIC } Supplies of pine produced by commercial plantations will increase rapidly over the next 5 years. y Pine plantations planted in the early 2000’s will soon mature, leading to an increase from roughly 200 000 m3 of pine production currently, to 800 000 m3 in 2023, and stabilizing at 1.2 million m3 after that. } Exporting timber from Uganda is impeded by restrictive policies. Numerous approval requirements and a lack of approved grading standards substantially hinder access to export licenses for timber. These restrictions are suppressing domestic prices relative to neighboring countries. } Trade restrictions hinder the profitability of commercial pine production. Based on average production costs and current domestic prices the Net Present Value of investment in commercial pine production ranges between negative USD 368 and negative USD 657 per hectare. } Removing export restrictions is critical to attract and sustain future investments in pine plantations and sawmilling. Access to higher prices offered in regional export markets contributes to a positive Net Present Value of pine plantation investments, in most scenarios, and a positive Net Present Value for investment in sawmilling. ECONOMIC AND POLICY ANALYSIS OF CLIMATE CHANGE OF CLIMATE ANALYSIS AND POLICY ECONOMIC The supply of pine from commercial plantations will rapidly increase over the next five years, but trade policy is lagging behind In 1990, 24 percent of Uganda was covered in natural forest. As a result of settlement and agricultural expansion, illegal logging, and charcoal production, natural forests in Uganda rapidly declined, reaching as low as nine percent of the country’s area in 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Ghide Habtetsion Gebremichael the History and Discourse of Kachung
    Ghide Habtetsion Gebremichael The History and Discourse of Kachung Forest View of Kachung plantation forest in 2016. Photo: Ghide Gebremichael Master’s thesis in Global Environmental History 1 “If we can really understand the problem, the answer will come out of it, because the answer is not separate from the problem.”(Jiddu Krishnamurti) 2 Abstract This study examined the history of the Kachung forest plantation in northern Uganda and associated environmental discourses. The forest, a project aimed at environmental protection and carbon offsetting, was designated a forest reserve in 1939 by the colonial government, as part of wider efforts to promote Ugandan timber for export and ensure their regeneration as a renewable resource. Since then, Kachung forest has been attributed different environmental significance by various actors, such as by the Uganda Forest Department, the Norwegian Agency for Development and Cooperation (NORAD), the Norwegian Afforestation Group (NAG) and presently by the Norwegian-based Green Resources company (GRAS). Between 1939 and 2006, the forest reserve underwent only limited changes in terms of management and composition. More radical change began in 2006, when GRAS started large- scale tree planting. In 2012, Kachung Forest was certified as a Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) project in accordance with the Kyoto Protocol. Since then, people living in and around the forest have been prevented from using forest resources for their livelihoods. They have expressed resistance to this by encroachment, setting fires in the forest and mounting angry protests against GRAS. One possible reason for this resistance is that afforestation took place with little prior knowledge of the forest’s history and value for local communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Forestry and Macroeconomic Accounts of Uganda
    THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA Ministry of Water and Environment. Forestry and Macroeconomic Accounts of Uganda: The Importance of Linking Ecosystem Services to Macroeconomics May 2018 Uganda Forest Technical Report Preamble and Acknowledgements This report summarises work conducted by the Uganda UN-REDD+ National programme during 2017 to guide the development of policy instruments for the Government of Uganda in order to evaluate the contribution of forests to the economy. The work conducted comprised economic modelling and analysis with the purpose of valuing the benefits of forest ecosystem services. The preliminary results presented here have not been verified by the Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS) and the National Forestry Authority (NFA), hence the ecosystem service valuations and policy Authors: recommendations are subject to change. Dr. Thierry De Oliveira UN Environment The work was highly reliant on data collection within Uganda. The UN-REDD+ National Programme, United Nations [email protected] Development Programme, UN Environment, the Uganda REDD+ secretariat and the authors wish to sincerely thank the Government departments and agencies as well as the Civil Society organizations which contributed to and supported Dr Jackie Crafford, Mr Nuveshen Naidoo, Mr Valmak Mathebula, Mr Joseph Mulders, this study. Special recognition goes to the team from the Uganda Bureau of Statistics, who provided valuable guidance Ms. Dineo Maila and Mr Kyle Harris and inputs during the study. Prime Africa, South Africa This study would not have been possible without the support of the staff from the IUCN Uganda country office, who [email protected] coordinated and steered this study on behalf of UN Environment.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ROLES of TREES on FARMS in UGANDA Current Status and Policy Recommendations for Future Development
    Gender Perspectives on Cocoa Production in Ecuador and Peru THE ROLES OF TREES ON FARMS IN UGANDA Current status and policy recommendations for future development Introduction plantations. This brief therefore presents a case for TonF, justifying the need for stronger policy recommendations With about 90% smallholder farmers reporting planting, and actions, the inclusion of TonF into natural capital growing, and protecting trees on their farms in Uganda accounts and valuation of ecosystem services, (UBOS, 2014), Trees on Farm (TonF) have an important role appreciation of their contribution to food security, and to play socially, economically, and ecologically. Despite resilience to climate catastrophes. their importance, there is no established mechanism to report on Trees on Farms in national environmental Specifically, the policy brief has three objectives: statistics as well as natural capital accounting and 1. Present the extent, coverage and adoption of tree valuation of ecosystem services; thus their contribution is growing on farms in Uganda. least appreciated. 2. Illustrate the contribution of TonF to biodiversity conservation, mitigation/adaptation actions and Because of institutional separation of forestry and improvement of livelihoods. agriculture sectors, policy support for TonF remains 3. Provide policy recommendations for enhancing TonF insufficient. Consequently, agribusiness value chains and the increased integration of trees in agricultural associated with TonF, are least developed, and their fields. contribution to household economies is overshadowed by products and services from natural forests and forest rees on Farms for Biodiversity About TonF in Uganda protected areas (Figure 1), with the Ministry of Water and Environment, in 2019, predicting no forest cover by 2030, TonF is the integration of woody perennials in agricultural if the current trend continues.
    [Show full text]
  • Agriculture and Forestry in Uganda ࠙ࠟࡦ࠳ߩㄘᨋᬺ Present Situation and Issues 㧙⃻⁁ߣ㐿⊒ߩ⺖㗴㧙 for Development 2010 ᐕ
    ᶏᄖㄘᬺ㐿⊒⺞ᩏ⎇ⓥ ࿖೎⎇ⓥࠪ࡝࡯࠭ No.79 ㅜ ਄ ࿖ ᡰ េ ߩ ߚ ߼ ߩ ၮ ␆ ⊛ ᖱ ႎ ᢛ ஻ ੐ ᬺ ⥄⛎⊛૞‛⎇ⓥ ೎ౠႎ๔ᦠ AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY IN UGANDA ࠙ࠟࡦ࠳ߩㄘᨋᬺ PRESENT SITUATION AND ISSUES 㧙⃻⁁ߣ㐿⊒ߩ⺖㗴㧙 FOR DEVELOPMENT 2010 ᐕ JapanJapan Association Association forfor InternationalInternational Collaboration Collaboration ofof AgricultureAgriculture and and Forestry Forestry ᐕ ᦬ March2010 20103 ␠࿅ ᴺੱ࿖㓙ㄘᨋᬺද௛දળ AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY IN UGANDA: PRESENT SITUATION AND ISSUES FOR DEVELOPMENT JAPAN ASSOCIATION FOR INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATION OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY 3F Akasaka KSA Bldg., 8-10-39 Akasaka, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 107-0052 Japan Tel: +81 - 3 - 5772- 7880 Fax: +81 - 3 - 5772 – 7680 Preface This publication is the summary of the basic information obtained through research and discussions on “Subsistence Crops” among the “Basic Information Collection and Analysis Project for the Support to Developing Countries”, commissioned by the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Japan. The program “Studies on Subsistence Crops” has chosen the cooking banana as the target crop in 2009, but in practice, the study was not limited to cooking banana, but also covered more broad aspects including current situation of agriculture in Uganda and themes for future development. This publication is thus issued as a separate report, considering that these basic information will not only contribute to the technology diffusion and promotion of cooking banana and related industry, but also will be valuable information for us to promote cooperation to Uganda in the field of agriculture and forestry, In Uganda, rural population exceeds more than 87% of the total, and more than half of the labor force is employed by agriculture.
    [Show full text]
  • Decisions Paris, 7 December 2012 Original: English/French
    7 COM ITH/12/7.COM/Decisions Paris, 7 December 2012 Original: English/French CONVENTION FOR THE SAFEGUARDING OF THE INTANGIBLE CULTURAL HERITAGE INTERGOVERNMENTAL COMMITTEE FOR THE SAFEGUARDING OF THE INTANGIBLE CULTURAL HERITAGE Seventh session UNESCO Headquarters, Paris 3 to 7 December 2012 DECISIONS ITH/12/7.COM/Decisions – page 2 DECISION 7.COM 2 The Committee, 1. Having examined document ITH/12/7.COM/2 Rev., 2. Adopts the agenda of its seventh session as annexed to this Decision. Agenda of the seventh session of the Committee 1. Opening of the session 2. Adoption of the agenda of the seventh session of the Committee 3. Replacement of the rapporteur 4. Admission of observers 5. Adoption of the summary records of the sixth ordinary session and fourth extraordinary session of the Committee 6. Examination of the reports of States Parties on the implementation of the Convention and on the current status of elements inscribed on the Representative List 7. Report of the Consultative Body on its work in 2012 8. Examination of nominations for inscription in 2012 on the List of Intangible Cultural Heritage in Need of Urgent Safeguarding 9. Examination of proposals for selection in 2012 to the Register of Best Safeguarding Practices 10. Examination of International Assistance requests greater than US$25,000 11. Report of the Subsidiary Body on its work in 2012 and examination of nominations for inscription in 2012 on the Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity 12. Questions concerning the 2013, 2014 and 2015 examination cycles a. System of rotation for the members of the Consultative Body b.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest-Based Associations As Drivers for Sustainable Development in Uganda
    Discussion paper Forest-based associations as drivers for sustainable development in Uganda Cornelius Kazoora, James Acworth, Charles Tondo and Bob Kazungu 2006 Sustainable Development Centre, Uganda Contacts: Cornelius Kazoora Sustainable Development Centre Makerere University Campus Senate building, Level 1, Office 3 P.O. Box 5463, Kampala-Uganda Tel: +39 726253 Email: [email protected] Duncan Macqueen Forestry and Land Use Programme International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED) 4 Hanover Street, Edinburgh, Scotland EH2 2EN, UK Tel: +44 131 226 6860, Fax: +44 131 624 7050 Email: [email protected] Website: www.iied.org Citation: Kazoora, C., Acworth, J., Tondo, C., and Kazungu, B. (2006). Forest-based associations as drivers for sustainable development in Uganda. IIED Small and Medium Forest Enterprise Series No. 15. International Institute for Environment and Development, Edinburgh, UK. ISBN: 1 84369 609 6 Copyright © International Institute for Environment and Development, 2006 Small and medium forestry enterprises for poverty reduction and sustainability Most international attention in forestry has been given to improving the conditions for large-scale or micro-scale forestry, and much less to the 'messy middle' – which produces a high proportion of forest products and involves huge numbers of people. Ways need to be found by which small and medium-scale forestry enterprises (SMFEs) can better contribute to reducing poverty and improving the prospects for sustainability. IIED, with partners in Uganda, South Africa, India, Brazil, Guyana and China have been investigating these issues. Country diagnostics show that the SMFE sector is of major significance for livelihoods in these countries – the net effect of myriad small players represents a substantial part of local economies.
    [Show full text]
  • CONGO BASIN States, Germany, France and UNESCO
    LB-NA-25161-EN-C The 2010 State of the Forest report (SOF) benefited from financial support from the European Union, the United THE FORESTS OF THE CONGO BASIN States, Germany, France and UNESCO. It represents the collaborative effort of over 100 individuals from a diver- sity of institutions and the forestry administrations of the Central African countries. The SOF process began with the selection and definition of indicators relevant to monitoring the state of forests in Central Africa. The indicators are structured around three thematic areas: (i) forest cover; (ii) management of State of the Forest 2010 production forests; and (iii) conservation and biodiversity. They are presented in a hierarchical structure at the regional, national and management unit (i.e. logging concessions and protected areas) levels. The indicators were vetted by a representative panel of stakeholders of forest management in Central Africa. The indicators are used to guide an annual data collection process carried out between April and August by natio- nal groups of four to ten individuals working within the forestry administrations. The data reported on in the 2010 SOF were primarily collected in 2009 and 2010. Results were validated in national workshops attended by govern- ment officials as well as representatives of environmental NGOs, the private sector and development projects. The data provided an important basis for the authors of the 11 chapters of the 2010 SOF, which were under the coordi- nation of a scientific committee of international renown. A final workshop was held 29-30 March, 2011 in Douala to review a draft report. Following amendments based on comments from a wide audience of experts the final State of the Forest 2010 layout was completed.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critical Analysis of the Protetion and Conservation of Forests in Uganda
    A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE PROTETION AND CONSERVATION OF FORESTS IN UGANDA. A CASE STUDY OF MABIRA FOREST MUKONO DISTRICT. ASIIMWE RICHARD LLB/31722/102/DU A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE SCHOOL OF LAW IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF LAWS OF KAMPALA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY JUNE 2014 DECLARATION I ASIIMWE RICHARD declare that this work is original work of my hands and had never been handed over to any other institution for any purpose. Signed A-, ... ...... .. .~ ... ........ .. ....... .................. ... ..... 2 DEDICATION I dedicate this research to my father Bwengye Micheal , mum katushabe Jolly,my uncle Mwesigwa Dan , my brothers Kusiima Edwin and Kwesiga Hillary ,my sisters Atwikiriza Faith and Agumenitwe Macbeth for their encouragement through my academic journey and making me who I am today, thank you and may God bless you abundantly. APPROVAL This dissertation has been submitted for examination to the school of law with my approval as the student supervisor. Supervisor: Prof. Magnus.N. Chima Dale ...............b ...... .. ... ....... l ~ ~ (9 ~~ I~ Signature:...... v ( ii ACKNOWLDGEMENT I do greatly acknowledge God's blessing for enabling me reach this far without Him I couldn't have reached here. Also great appreciation goes to my supervisor prof.Magnus.N. Chima for his due diligence and ensuring that my work meets the required standards. To my best friend kagombe Dan with whom we have been together in this academic journey, walugembe Paul, Namulinde peace, Mazimwe Lillian and Hanifa for her great effort to make sure that the work is typed and printed in time. iii TABLE OF CONTENT DECLARATION ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A History of the Heritage Economy in Yoweri Museveni's Uganda
    Journal of Eastern African Studies ISSN: 1753-1055 (Print) 1753-1063 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rjea20 A history of the heritage economy in Yoweri Museveni’s Uganda Derek R. Peterson To cite this article: Derek R. Peterson (2016) A history of the heritage economy in Yoweri Museveni’s Uganda, Journal of Eastern African Studies, 10:4, 789-806, DOI: 10.1080/17531055.2016.1272297 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17531055.2016.1272297 Published online: 01 Feb 2017. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rjea20 Download by: [University of Cambridge] Date: 01 February 2017, At: 07:29 JOURNAL OF EASTERN AFRICAN STUDIES, 2016 VOL. 10, NO. 4, 789–806 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17531055.2016.1272297 A history of the heritage economy in Yoweri Museveni’s Uganda Derek R. Peterson Department of History, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY When the National Resistance Movement (NRM) came to power in Received 19 August 2016 1986, its cadres overflowed with reformist zeal. They set out to Accepted 9 December 2016 transform Uganda’s public life, put an end to ethnic division, and KEYWORDS promote local democracy. Today much of this reformist energy Yoweri Museveni; elections; has dissipated, and undemocratic kingdoms largely define the heritage; traditional cultural landscape. This essay attempts to explain how these medicine; Rwenzururu things came to pass. It argues that the heritage economy offered NRM officials and other brokers an ensemble of bureaucratic techniques with which to naturalize and standardize cultures.
    [Show full text]
  • Promoting Commercial Forestry in Uganda
    Report Promoting commercial forestry in Uganda The experience of the Tree Biotechnology Programme Linda Calabrese March 2021 Readers are encouraged to reproduce material for their own publications, as long as they are not being sold commercially. ODI requests due acknowledgement and a copy of the publication. For online use, we ask readers to link to the original resource on the ODI website. The views presented in this paper are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of ODI or our partners. This work is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Cover photo: Rob Beechey for Gatsby Africa Acknowledgements This report was prepared as an output of the ODI–Gatsby Africa Learning Partnership. The author warmly acknowledges all those who shared their time, knowledge and insights during the preparation of this report, either as interviewees or by providing comments and valuable suggestions. The author is especially grateful to Ryan Bourque, Jack Steege and Rory Mack (Gatsby Africa), who provided support and insights throughout the work, and to Dirk Willem te Velde (ODI) for his insights and feedback. While many of the suggestions made by several of the above have been freely adopted, responsibility for the final content of the publication rests with the author alone. The views expressed should not be attributed to any of those named, Gatsby Africa or ODI. 3 Contents Acknowledgements 3 List of boxes, tables and figures 5 Acronyms 6 Executive summary 7 1 Introduction 9 2 The Tree Biotechnology Programme in East Africa 10 3 The
    [Show full text]
  • A Century of Forest Management Research in Uganda: 1898-1998
    ganda Journal ofAgricul111retl Sciences, 2002. 7: 7-11 ISSN 1026-0919 Printed in Uganda. ©2002 National Agricultural Research Organisation A century of forest management research in Uganda: 1898-1998 J. F. 0., Esegu and P Ndemere Forestry Research Jnstitule P.O. Box 1752, Kampala Abstract The early people of Uga nt.l a derived their livelihood fr om natural forests by collecting wild fruits for food, fuelwood for domestic heating and metal working, wood for building and making canoes for fishing and warfare, herbs and other plant parts for. medicine, and many other social and cultural uses. Su bsequently forestry ma.nagement developed into economic activities to supply both fuelwood and timber for domestic and industrial uses, for export. Forests were also cleared for establishment of plan tation crops such as coffee, sugar cane and tea. Early investigations explored the stocking of rubber trees and l'ines in the natural forests and ecological, studies which culminated in the publication of the book " Indigenous Trees of Uganda" in 1951. This was followed by the development of silvicu ltural research in volving underplanting of residual forest after logging; and the development of polycyclic selection method and a monocyclic shelterwood silvicultural system. Plantation forestry research in Uganda wa~ in iti ated to iden tify suitable species for increased aµd reliable production of timber and ott1er forest products. This was mainly because the natural forests were incapable of supplying the quantities and types of ti mber demanded by the market. Suitable species and provenances for plantation forestry have been identifie<l including the techniques for raising and managing them.
    [Show full text]