DOCSLIB.ORG

Notice of Annual Shareholders' Meeting and Proxy Statement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

2016 Notice of Annual Shareholders’ Meeting and Proxy Statement Friday, June 3, 2016 8:00 a.m., Central time Bud Walton Arena, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas NYSE: WMT “Our Board has the right skills and experience to support the company's strategy.” April 20, 2016 Dear Fellow Shareholders: We are pleased to invite you to attend Walmart’s 2016 maximize our effectiveness as we adapt to evolving Annual Shareholders’ Meeting on June 3, 2016 at 8:00 customer needs. These changes include reducing the a.m. Central Time. If you plan to attend, please see size of the Board while maintaining its independence, page 94 for admission requirements. For those unable changing the composition of Board committees, to join in-person, the meeting will also be webcast at and ensuring that Board and committee agendas www.stock.walmart.com. are focused on Walmart’s strategic priorities. We have revised the Corporate Governance section of Walmart is going through a period of transformation as our proxy statement to provide more information on we make strategic investments to better serve customers these topics (see page 12). Your Board is committed and drive shareholder value. Over the past year, we have to continuous improvement, and in early 2016 we actively engaged with many of our largest institutional engaged a third party consulting firm to help us think shareholders to understand their perspectives on a variety about ways to further improve our effectiveness. The of topics, including corporate strategy, governance, and sentiment from shareholders has been consistent – compensation. We both participated in this engagement effort and we would like to take this opportunity to update that the value, quality, and diversity of our directors you on some of the themes from these discussions, are strategic assets for Walmart. which are also key focus areas for our Board. Our compensation program is aligned with our strategy Our Board is actively engaged in company strategy •• The Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee of our Board regularly reviews the • • We remain focused on the execution of our enterprise performance metrics used in our incentive plans strategy – working to win with stores, deepening and has determined that they are appropriately digital relationships with customers, and bolstering aligned with shareholder interests. We have revised critical capabilities such as our next generation supply the disclosure in the Compensation Discussion chain, technology and data, our talent, and how we and Analysis section of our proxy statement to work. The Board believes that this strategy positions address some of the frequently asked questions the company for sustainable growth in the future. from shareholders, and to more clearly describe We have challenged management to accelerate the the direct link between executive compensation and pace of change even further, and we are tracking corporate strategy (see page 39). In our conversations, various metrics such as comp sales and customer shareholders expressed a variety of viewpoints on satisfaction scores to monitor progress in delivering our executive compensation program, but most felt the strategy. In our conversations with shareholders, it was appropriately performance-based and aligned they expressed strong support for our investments with our strategy. in our people and technology, as we seek to deliver a seamless shopping experience for our customers. The Board greatly values shareholder feedback and thanks those of you who contributed to the constructive Our Board has the right skills and experience dialogue. You have challenged us to continue to improve to support the company’s strategy our proxy statement disclosure, and we hope that you will find this year’s proxy statement even better than the •• We believe that Board refreshment and succession last. Thank you for being a Walmart shareholder and planning are critical as Walmart continues to change we look forward to seeing many of you at the meeting for our customer. We’ve added 5 new independent in June. Regardless of whether or not you attend the directors to the Board in the last 4 years, and we’ve meeting in person, your vote is important to us. For made changes to the way the Board operates to instructions on how to vote, please see page 91 of our proxy statement. Gregory B. Penner Dr. James I. Cash, Jr. Chairman Lead Independent Director Notice of 2016 Annual Shareholders’ Meeting Friday, June 3, 2016 8:00 a.m., Central time Bud Walton Arena, University of Arkansas Campus, Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701 Please join our Board of Directors, senior leadership, and other shareholders for the Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 2016 Annual ■ HOW TO CAST YOUR VOTE (PAGE 91) Shareholders’ Meeting. You can vote by any of the following methods: ■ ITEMS OF BUSINESS 1. To elect as directors the 12 nominees identified in the on the internet at www.proxyvote.com; accompanying proxy statement; 2. To vote on a non-binding, advisory resolution to approve the compensation of the company’s named executive officers; calling toll-free (U.S. and Canada) at 1-800-690-6903; 3. To vote on the approval of the Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 2016 Associate Stock Purchase Plan; on your mobile device by scanning the QR code 4. To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the on your proxy card, notice of internet availability of company’s independent accountants for the fiscal year ending proxy materials, or voting instruction form; January 31, 2017; 5. To vote on the 3 shareholder proposals described in the mailing in your signed proxy card or voting instruction accompanying proxy statement, if properly presented at the form (if you received one); or meeting; and 6. To transact any other business properly brought before the in person at the 2016 Annual Shareholders’ Meeting. 2016 Annual Shareholders’ Meeting. ■ RECORD DATE ■ HOW TO ATTEND THE MEETING The record date for the meeting is April 8, 2016. This means that you are entitled to receive notice of the meeting and vote If you plan to attend the meeting in person, please see page 94 your shares at the meeting if you were a shareholder of record for admission requirements. as of the close of business on April 8, 2016. The proxy statement and our Annual Report to Shareholders for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2016, are available in the “Investors” section of our corporate website at http://stock. walmart.com/annual-reports. April 20, 2016 By Order of the Board of Directors Jeffrey J. Gearhart Executive Vice President, Global Governance and Corporate Secretary Table of Contents STOCK OWNERSHIP 75 Holdings of Major Shareholders ............................................................................................ 75 Holdings of Officers and Directors �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 76 LETTER FROM CHAIRMAN AND LEAD INDEPENDENT Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance ........................... 77 DIRECTOR 3 Proposal No. 3: Approval of the Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 2016 Associate Stock Purchase Plan ������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 77 NOTICE OF 2016 ANNUAL SHAREHOLDERS’ MEETING 5 AUDIT MATTERS 79 Audit Committee Report ............................................................................................................. 79 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY 8 Audit Committee Financial Experts..................................................................................... 80 Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy .............................................................................. 81 Transaction Review Policy .......................................................................................................... 81 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 12 Proposal No. 4: Ratification of Independent Accountants ............................. 82 Proposal No. 1: Election of Directors .............................................................................. 12 SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS 84 Board Leadership Structure ..................................................................................................... 24 Board Committees ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 25 Proposal No. 5: Request to Adopt an Independent Chairman Policy ������ 84 Board Meetings and Director Attendance .................................................................... 28 Walmart’s Statement in Opposition to Proposal No. 5 .......................................... 85 Board Attendance at Annual Shareholders’ Meetings ........................................ 28 Proposal No. 6: Request for Annual Report Regarding Incentive Communicating with the Board ............................................................................................. 28 Compensation Plans ...................................................................................................................... 86 Board Evaluations and Board Effectiveness ............................................................... 29 Walmart’s Statement in Opposition to Proposal No. 6 ........................................... 86 Board Refreshment and Succession Planning.......................................................... 29 Proposal No. 7: Request for Report Regarding Criteria for Director Onboarding and Engagement with the Business ������������������������������ 30 Operating in High-Risk Regions ...........................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Wal-Mart Stores, Ine,1 Aaron Brenner, Barry Eidlin, and Kerry

    Wal-Mart Stores, Ine,1 Aaron Brenner, Barry Eidlin, and Kerry

    Wal-Mart Stores, Ine,1 Aaron Brenner, Barry Eidlin, and Kerry Candaele Under the supervision of TomJuravich Conference Research Director Kate Bronfenbrenner Conference Coordinator February 1, 2006 Prepared for the International Conference Global Companies - Global Unions - Global Research - Global Campaigns 1 This report was funded by the universities supporting the Global Companies-Global Unions-Global Research- Global Campaigns conference and prepared in keeping with one o f the primary goals o f the conference- increasing our understanding o f the changing nature o f the structure and practices o f multinational corporations in the global economy. It was prepared for educational purposes only and should not be copied, distributed, or disseminated beyond the participants o f this conference. Neither Cornell nor any o f the authors or other academic institutions involved in preparing this report intends to advocate or advance any particular action by any individual or organization as a result o f the report. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Executive Summary...................................... .............. „....„.............................................................1 1.1 Description and Operations............. .............................................................................................2 1.2 Profit Centers............................................................... .................................................................. 5 1.3 Growth Plan..................................................... .............................................................
  • Phony Philanthropy of the Walmart Heirs

    Phony Philanthropy of the Walmart Heirs

    Legal Disclaimer: UFCW and OUR Walmart have the purpose of helping Wal-Mart employees as individuals or groups in their dealings with Wal-Mart over labor rights and standards and their efforts to have Wal-Mart publically commit to adhering to labor rights and standards. UFCW and OUR Walmart have no intent to have Walmart recognize or bargain with UFCW or OUR Walmart as the representative of Walmart employees. Walmart1Percent.Org WALTON FAMILY “PHILANTHROPY”: A Distraction from the Walmart Economy Americans believe in the power of charitable giving. Eighty-eight percent of American households give to charity, contributing more than $2,000 per year on average.1 Despite their charitable inclinations, most American families, acting on their own, lack the financial resources to make a significant impact on the problems facing our society. The Walton family, majority owner of Walmart, is a notable exception. As members of the richest family in the United States, the Waltons have $140 billion at their disposal—enough wealth to make a positive mark on the world and still leave a fortune for their descendants. The Waltons certainly wish to be seen as a force for good. Their company claims to help people “live better” and the Walton Family Foundation mission statement speaks of “creating opportunity so that individuals and communities can live better in today’s world.”2 But that mission statement seems ironic, given that many of the most acute challenges facing American families in 2014 could rightfully be viewed as symptoms of our “Walmart economy,” characterized by rising inequality and economic insecurity.
  • WAL-MART At50

    WAL-MART At50

    WAL-MART at50 FROM ARKANSAS TO THE WORLD a supplement to . VOL. 29, NO. 27 • JULY 2, 2012 ARKANSASBUSINESS.COM/WALMART50 Fifty years old, and healthy as ever Congratulations, Walmart! And thanks for letting us care for your associates and communities. From one proud Arkansas company to another CONGRATULATIONS TO A GREAT AMERICAN SUCCESS STORY It has been a privilege to travel with Walmart on its remarkable journey, including managing the company’s 1970 initial public offering. From one proud Arkansas company to another, best wishes to all Walmart associates everywhere. INVESTMENT BANKING • WEALTH MANAGEMENT INSURANCE • RESEARCH • SALES & TRADING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT • PUBLIC FINANCE • PRIVATE EQUITY STEPHENS INC. • MEMBER NYSE, SIPC • 1-800-643-9691 STEPHENS.COM WAL-MART at 50 • 3 Wal-Mart: INSIDE: A Homegrown 6 The World of Wal-Mart Mapping the growth of a retail giant Phenomenon 8 Timeline: A not-so-short history of Wal-Mart Stores Inc. Thousands of Arkansans have a Wal-Mart experience to share from the past 50 years that goes far beyond the routine trip to a Supercenter last week. 10 IPO Set the Stage for Global Expansion Wal-Mart is an exciting, homegrown phenomenon engineered by the late Sam Walton, a brilliant businessman who surrounded himself with smart people and proceeded to revolutionize 14 Influx of Workers Transforms retailing, logistics and, indeed, our state and the world. He created a heightened awareness of stock Northwest Arkansas investments as investors from Arkansas to Wall Street watched the meteoric rise in share prices and wondered when the next stock split would occur.
  • Lidl Expanding to New York with Best Market Purchase

    Lidl Expanding to New York with Best Market Purchase

    INSIDE TAKING THIS ISSUE STOCK by Jeff Metzger At Capital Markets Day, Ahold Delhaize Reveals Post-Merger Growth Platform Krasdale Celebrates “The merger and integration of Ahold and Delhaize Group have created a 110th At NYC’s Museum strong and efficient platform for growth, while maintaining strong business per- Of Natural History formance and building a culture of success. In an industry that’s undergoing 12 rapid change, fueled by shifting customer behavior and preferences, we will focus on growth by investing in our stores, omnichannel offering and techno- logical capabilities which will enrich the customer experience and increase efficiencies. Ultimately, this will drive growth by making everyday shopping easier, fresher and healthier for our customers.” Those were the words of Ahold Delhaize president and CEO Frans Muller to the investment and business community delivered at the company’s “Leading Wawa’s Mike Sherlock WWW.BEST-MET.COM Together” themed Capital Markets Day held at the Citi Executive Conference Among Those Inducted 20 In SJU ‘Hall Of Honor’ Vol. 74 No. 11 BROKERS ISSUE November 2018 See TAKING STOCK on page 6 Discounter To Convert 27 Stores Next Year Lidl Expanding To New York With Best Market Purchase Lidl, which has struggled since anteed employment opportunities high quality and huge savings for it entered the U.S. 17 months ago, with Lidl following the transition. more shoppers.” is expanding its footprint after an- Team members will be welcomed Fieber, a 10-year Lidl veteran, nouncing it has signed an agree- into positions with Lidl that offer became U.S. CEO in May, replac- ment to acquire 27 Best Market wages and benefits that are equal ing Brendan Proctor who led the AHOLD DELHAIZE HELD ITS CAPITAL MARKETS DAY AT THE CITIBANK Con- stores in New York (26 stores – to or better than what they cur- company’s U.S.
  • Web Search Tutoring for the Local Community

    Web Search Tutoring for the Local Community

    Web search for local communities in the Highlands of Scotland: A self-tutoring guide MODULE III Alternatives to Google: some other search tools worth a try © Copyright Hans Zell Publishing Consultants 2011 Glais Bheinn, Lochcarron, Ross-shire IV54 8YB, Scotland, UK Email: [email protected] Web: www.hanszell.co.uk Web search for local communities in the Highlands of Scotland: A self-tutoring guide MODULE I How to get the most out of Google Web search MODULE II A concise guide to Google products, services, applications, and other offerings MODULE III Alternatives to Google: some other search tools worth a try MODULE IV The best of the Web: a guide to some of the most information-rich resources on the Internet 2 Introduction Google is a marvellous Web search tool and is as good as they get at present, but it is certainly not the only one. Other top search engines include Ask.com (aka as Ask Jeeves), Bing (formerly called MSN Search), and Yahoo! (and see General purpose, product, and visual search engines below). According to data published by Experian Hitwise http://www.hitwise.com/us/datacenter/main/dashboard-23984.html in June 2011, Google still heavily dominates the market with a share of about 68%, while the market share of Yahoo and Microsoft’s Bing currently is something just under 14% for both; Ask.com is in fourth place with around 2.6%, and AOL Search in fifth place with about 1.4%. The picture is roughly the same if ranked by number of visits, although Bing does better than Yahoo in this category.
  • A Nalise Conomica

    A Nalise Conomica

    ISSN 0102-9924 ACULDADE DE CIÊNCIAS ECONÔMICAS DA UFRGS A nalise conomica REESTRUTURAÇÃO DA PRODUÇÃO AGRÍCOLA NO RIO GRANM DO SUL, DE 1970 A 1996 E UMA ESTFMAÇÃO PARA 2012 TIAGO WICKSTROM ALVES A CRIMINALIDADE NA REGIÃO METROPOLITANA DE SALVADOR JOSÉ CARRERA FERNANDEZ, LUIZ FERNANDO LOBO COMPETITIVIDADE INTERNACIONAL EM SOFTWARE: UM ESTUDO SOBRE A EXPERFÊNOA DE FLORIANÓPOLIS HOYÉ DO NUNES LINS MODELOS DE ORGANIZAÇÃO E REPARTIÇÃO DE RENDAS NA CADEIA PRODUTIVA DO GÃ S NATURAL HÉLDER QUEÍROZ PÍNTO JÚ NIOR, RODOLFO TORRES DOS SANTOS REGIMES MONETÁRIOS E DÍVÍDA PÚBLKIA; UMA ANÁLISE DE MECANISMOS ALTERNATIVOS DE COORDENAÇÃO FLAACROECONÕ MICA MANOEL CARLOS DE CASTRO PIRES ECONOMIA DOS RECURSOS NATURAIS E SEUS INDICADORES DE ESCASSEZ; UMA QUESTÃ O DE SUSTENTABILIDADE ANDREA SALES SOARES DE AZEVEDO MELO • O ECOPROTECIONISMO AGRICOLA NA UNIÃO EUROPÉIA E SEUS POSSÍVEIS RMPACTOS SOBRE A ECONOMIA BRASILEIRA RODRIGO DANIEL FEIX, CLÁUDIO R. FÓFFANO VASCONCELOS PADRÕ ES DE DESENVOLVIMENTO, FUNÇ Õ ES ESTATAIS E ENDIVIDAMENTO NO CAPITALISMO CONTEMPORÂNEO PAULO BALANÇO, EDUARDO COSTA PINTO A INTERNACIONALIZAÇÃO DO VAREJO A PARTIR DOS WAL-MART E CARREFOUR ARMANDO JOÃ O DALLA COSTA UMA ANÁ LISE ECONOMÉ TRICA DO FUTEBOL BRASILEIRO ARÍ FRANCISCO DE ARAÚJO ÍR. CLÃ UDIO D. SHIKIDA, LEONARDO M. MONASTERIO o BRASIL E A ECONOMIA INTERNACIONAL: RECUPERAÇÃO E DEFESA DA AUTONOMIA NACIONAL RESENHA DE ALEXANDRE CÉSAR CUNHA LEITE REGIMES MONETARIOS: TEORIA E A EXPERIÊNCIA DO REAL RESENHA DE FERNANDO FERRARI FILHO Setembro, 2005 UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAI, DO RIO GRANDE DO Sm Os mateiiais publicados na revista Atuilise Reitor. Prof José Carlos Feiraz Hennemann Eíouôiniça são da exclusiva responsabilidade dos autores. É permitida a reprodução total ou parcial dos FACUI DADE ÜE CIÊNCIAS ECONÔMICAS trabalhos, desde que seja citada a fonte.
  • Taxation of Financial Capital: Is the Wealth Tax the Solution?

    Taxation of Financial Capital: Is the Wealth Tax the Solution?

    Taxation of Financial Capital: Is the W ealth T ax the Solution? Emmanuel Saez UC Berkeley PIIE Inequality Conference October 2019 1 % of national income 100% 200% 300% 400% 500% Thisfigure depicts the 0% 1913 1918 1923 share 1928 Total of total 1933 household wealth (to (to wealth household national income) household 1938 1943 wealth relativewealth to nationalincome Source: 1948 1953 1958 1963 1968 1973 1978 Ma 1983 rke Piketty, Piketty, 1988 val t Saez, and Zucman 1993 ue 1998 2003 2008 (2018). 2013 2018 Top 0.1% Wealth Share Estimates 25% Capitalization Revised capitalization 20% SCF+Forbes 400 15% 10% Estate m ul tiplier 5% (adjusted) 0% 1913 1918 1923 1928 1933 1938 1943 1948 1953 1958 1963 1968 1973 1978 1983 1988 1993 1998 2003 2008 2013 This figure depicts the share of total household wealth owned by the top 0.1% of families (tax units) from various data sources. 0.0% 0.5% 1.0% 1.5% 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 3.5% 198 2 198 6 Forbes 400 wealth share 199 0 199 4 199 8 200 2 (% of US 200 6 wealth) 201 0 201 4 201 8 Long-Term Wealth Taxation and Top Wealth Holders Current 2018 wealth ($ billions) Top Wealth Holder Source 1. Jeff Bezos Amazon (founder) 160.0 2. Bill Gates Microsoft (founder) 97.0 3. Warren Buffett Berkshire Hathaway 88.3 4. Mark Zuckerberg Facebook(founder) 61.0 5. Larry Ellison Oracle (founder) 58.4 6. Larry Page Google (founder) 53.8 7. David Koch Koch industries 53.5 8.
  • Threat from the Right Intensifies

    Threat from the Right Intensifies

    THREAT FROM THE RIGHT INTENSIFIES May 2018 Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................1 Meeting the Privatization Players ..............................................................................3 Education Privatization Players .....................................................................................................7 Massachusetts Parents United ...................................................................................................11 Creeping Privatization through Takeover Zone Models .............................................................14 Funding the Privatization Movement ..........................................................................................17 Charter Backers Broaden Support to Embrace Personalized Learning ....................................21 National Donors as Longtime Players in Massachusetts ...........................................................25 The Pioneer Institute ....................................................................................................................29 Profits or Professionals? Tech Products Threaten the Future of Teaching ....... 35 Personalized Profits: The Market Potential of Educational Technology Tools ..........................39 State-Funded Personalized Push in Massachusetts: MAPLE and LearnLaunch ....................40 Who’s Behind the MAPLE/LearnLaunch Collaboration? ...........................................................42 Gates
  • 2019 Annual Development Report

    2019 Annual Development Report

    2019 ANNUAL DEVELOPMENT REPORT Brick Avenue Lofts Thaden School Climb Bentonville Phillips Park Townhomes www.bentonvillear.com DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY The Annual Development Report is a compilation of data from the Building Services division and the Planning division to present a picture of the development activity in Bentonville in 2019. Building data, including permits and inspections, identify development that has started and completed construction. The Planning data, including plats, large scale developments, and rezonings, are projects that are in the planning phase of development. Building Services 2019 Building Services Permits. The city issued 1,750 building permits, up 1% from 2018. After the 11% increase between 2017 and permits: 1,750 1% 2018, this year’s small increase suggests that permits inspections: 19, 570 7% are increasing at a slower rate. value: $454 M 8% Inspections. Inspectors conducted a total of 19,570 completions: 771 6% inspections, including both building and code enforcement inspections, down 7% from 2018. Building inspections were down 12% with 17,385 Building Services Data Sources inspections while code enforcement was up by 72% permits inspections valuation certificates of occupancy with 2,185 inspections. BUILDING PERMITS Value. The valuation of all building permits was $454 2015-2019 million, down 8%. The value of new commercial development was up 14% with a total value of $159 million. Single-family value was down by 4%, totaling $135 million. Demolition. Demolition activity was lower in 2019 1750 1562 1732 than 2018. The number of relocation and demolitition 1375 1461 permits in 2019 was 86, down from 117 in 2018. Completions.
  • Wal-Mart's CEO Urges Employees to Reimagine Company's Future

    Wal-Mart's CEO Urges Employees to Reimagine Company's Future

    Wal-Mart’s CEO urges employees to reimagine company’s future Doug McMillon, chief executive officer and president, talks on stage during the annual Wal- Mart Shareholders Meeting on Friday, June 3, 2016, in Fayetteville, Ark. (Jason Ivester/The Arkansas Democrat-Gazette via AP) MANDATORY CREDIT (Associated Press) By Anne D'Innocenzio | AP June 3 FAYETTEVILLE, Ark. — Wal-Mart‟s CEO urged employees on Friday to reimagine its future in a fast-shifting retail landscape. The company is at a crossroads, as its long-held dominance in pricing and convenience has been chipped away at by Amazon and dollar stores. But it‟s fighting back on multiple fronts, growing more aggressive with prices and going after Amazon, both online and on the doorstep, by expanding delivery services to cater to shoppers who want to buy anywhere, anytime. “We want to make every day easier for busy families. We‟re connecting all the parts of Wal-Mart into one seamless shopping experience with great stores, easy pickup, fast delivery and apps and websites that are simple to use,” Chief Executive Doug McMillon said at the annual shareholders‟ meeting. The event was packed with 14,000 people including nearly 6,000 Wal-Mart workers as well as shareholders, analysts and several Walton family members. The legacy of the company‟s late founder Sam Walton still resonates, with executives paying homage to his philosophy of low prices and customer service. Part business meeting, part pep rally, the meeting was hosted by comedian James Corden and featured musicians Katy Perry, Nick Jonas, Maxwell and Andy Grammer.
  • Analysis of the Impact of Public Tweet Sentiment on Stock Prices

    Analysis of the Impact of Public Tweet Sentiment on Stock Prices

    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont CMC Senior Theses CMC Student Scholarship 2020 A Little Birdy Told Me: Analysis of the Impact of Public Tweet Sentiment on Stock Prices Alexander Novitsky Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses Part of the Business Analytics Commons, Portfolio and Security Analysis Commons, and the Technology and Innovation Commons Recommended Citation Novitsky, Alexander, "A Little Birdy Told Me: Analysis of the Impact of Public Tweet Sentiment on Stock Prices" (2020). CMC Senior Theses. 2459. https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/2459 This Open Access Senior Thesis is brought to you by Scholarship@Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in this collection by an authorized administrator. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Claremont McKenna College A Little Birdy Told Me Analysis of the Impact of Public Tweet Sentiment on Stock Prices Submitted to Professor Yaron Raviv and Professor Michael Izbicki By Alexander Lisle David Novitsky For Bachelor of Arts in Economics Semester 2, 2020 May 11, 2020 Novitsky 1 Abstract The combination of the advent of the internet in 1983 with the Securities and Exchange Commission’s ruling allowing firms the use of social media for public disclosures merged to create a wealth of user data that traders could quickly capitalize on to improve their own predictive stock return models. This thesis analyzes some of the impact that this new data may have on stock return models by comparing a model that uses the Index Price and Yesterday’s Stock Return to one that includes those two factors as well as average tweet Polarity and Subjectivity.
  • This Year's Edition

    This Year's Edition

    CO-AUTHORS: Chuck Collins directs the Program on Inequality and the Common Good at the Institute for Policy Studies, where he also co-edits Inequality.org. His most recent book is Is Inequality in America Irreversible? from Polity Press and in 2016 he published Born on Third Base. Other reports and books by Collins include Reversing Inequality: Unleashing the Transformative Potential of An More Equal Economy and 99 to 1: How Wealth Inequality is Wrecking the World and What We Can Do About It. His 2004 book Wealth and Our Commonwealth, written with Bill Gates Sr., makes the case for taxing inherited fortunes. Josh Hoxie directs the Project on Opportunity and Taxation at the Institute for Policy Studies and co- edits Inequality.org. He co-authored a number of reports on topics ranging from economic inequality, to the racial wealth divide, to philanthropy. Hoxie has written widely on income and wealth maldistribution for Inequality.org and other media outlets. He worked previously as a legislative aide for U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders. Acknowledgements: We received significant assistance in the production of this report. We would like to thank our colleagues at IPS who helped us throughout the report. The Institute for Policy Studies (www.IPS-dc.org) is a multi-issue research center founded in 1963. The Program on Inequality and the Common Good was founded in 2006 to draw attention to the growing dangers of concentrated wealth and power, and to advocate policies and practices to reverse extreme inequalities in income, wealth, and opportunity. The Inequality.org website (http://inequality.org/) provides an online portal into all things related to the income and wealth gaps that so divide us.