DOCSLIB.ORG

Curriculum Vitae Major General Philippe BOUCKÉ, Aide-De-Camp to the King

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Curriculum Vitae Major General Philippe BOUCKÉ, Aide-De-Camp to the King Curriculum Vitae Major general Philippe BOUCKÉ, Aide-de-Camp to the King Major general Philippe Boucké starts his military career as a cadet in the Royal Military Academy in 1981. His first appointment in July 1986 is the Second Regiment Jagers te Paard (Horseback Hunters) in Germany, a Reconnaissance battalion which was transforming into an armoured battalion. After the first big restructuring of the Belgian Armed Forces in 1992, he stays in Germany and becomes Commander of an Armoured Squadron in the Second Regiment Gidsen, an armoured battalion. After a short period as assistant to the Operations Officer in the 17 Armoured Brigade in Germany, he participates to the UN-mission UNPROFOR in ex-Yugoslavia in 1994. After the Major’s Course in 1995-1996, Captain Boucké returns to Belgium and joins the First Regiment Jagers te Paard (Horseback Hunters), the Reconnaissance battalion of NATO’s MND(C), the Multinational Division Centre. During his period as Operations Officer in this battalion, he leaves on very short notice in June 1999 to Kosovo to prepare the KFOR mission of the first Belgian Battle group. Ending this NATO mission, he joins the Staff of the First Mechanized Brigade. In 2000 Major Boucké becomes the Operations Officer of this brigade. In 2002 he joins the General Staff in Brussels, working in the Evaluation and Lessons Learned Branch, responsible for the management of all operational evaluations and for the BSc (Balanced Score Card) of the Operations & Training department. After the General Staff College Course Lieutenant-colonel General Staff College Graduate Boucké becomes the Chief Of Staff of the First Mechanized Brigade and Commander of the Headquarter battalion of this brigade on 29 July 2005. After two years of command he stays in the brigade and is appointed Deputy Commander in October 2007. In March 2009, he starts a new path in his career as a military advisor at the Permanent Delegation of Belgium to NATO. He represents the National Armaments Director and gives military advice to the Belgian Ambassador to NATO inter alia on Missile Defence, operations and exercises. Colonel General Staff College Graduate Boucké takes over the command of the Medium Brigade on 25 April 2012. The Chief Of Defence appoints him as the Force Commander of the Belgian-led European Union Battle Group (EUBG) 2014-2, a multinational battle group of around 3700 military and civilians. After the handover of his command of the Medium Brigade on 13 February 2015, he joins the Governance and Policy Support Cell of the Chief Of Defence and takes the lead of this cell in July 2016. Promoted to Major general on 26 March 2017, he is appointed as Assistant Chief Of Staff Strategy. After more than 3 years heading this department, he is appointed as Assistant Chief Of Staff intelligence and security and Chief of the Service Général du Renseignement et de la Sécurité on 17 September 2020. Major general Boucké is married and is the proud father of two adult children. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • French Armed Forces Update November 2020
    French Armed Forces Update November 2020 This paper is NOT an official publication from the French Armed Forces. It provides an update on the French military operations and main activities. The French Defense Attaché Office has drafted it in accordance with open publications. The French Armed Forces are heavily deployed both at home and overseas. On the security front, the terrorist threat is still assessed as high in France and operation “Sentinelle” (Guardian) is still going on. Overseas, the combat units are extremely active against a determined enemy and the French soldiers are constantly adapting their courses of action and their layout plans to the threat. Impacted by the Covid-19 pandemic, the French Armed Forces have resumed their day-to-day activities and operations under the sign of transformation and modernization. DeuxIN huss arMEMORIAMds parachut istes tués par un engin explosif improvisé au Mali | Zone Militaire 09/09/2020 11:16 SHARE On September 5th, during a control operation within the Tessalit + region, three hussards were seriously injured after the explosion & of an Improvised Explosive Device. Despite the provision of + immediate care and their quick transportation to the hospital, the ! hussard parachutiste de 1ère classe Arnaud Volpe and + brigadier-chef S.T1 died from their injuries. ' + ( Après la perte du hussard de 1ere classe Tojohasina Razafintsalama, le On23 November 12th, during a routine mission in the vicinity of juillet, lors d’une attaque suicide commise avec un VBIED [véhicule piégé], le 1er Régiment de Hussards Parachutistes [RHP] a une nouvelle fois été Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt, nine members of the Multinational endeuillé, ce 5 septembre.
    [Show full text]
  • Nato Hq Office of the Gender Advisor International Military Staff 7 March 2016
    NATO HQ OFFICE OF THE GENDER ADVISOR INTERNATIONAL MILITARY STAFF 7 MARCH 2016 Table of Contents Chapter Page Introduction . 5 Executive Summary . 7 1. Representation of Men and Women in the Armed Forces in 2014 . 8 2. Applications and Successful Recruitments in 2014 . 11 3. Retention Statistics in 2014 . 13 4. Services and Ranks in 2014 . .14 5. Integration of Gender Perspectives in 2014 . 16 6. Conclusion . 19 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Table of Contents Chapter Page 7. 2014 National Reports from NATO Nations 21 Albania . 22 Belgium . 25 Bulgaria . 28 Canada . 31 Croatia . 35 Czech Republic . 38 Denmark . 41 Estonia . 44 France . 45 Germany . 48 Greece . 51 Hungary . 54 Iceland . 56 Italy . 57 Latvia . 60 Lithuania . 62 Luxembourg . 65 Netherlands . 67 Norway . 71 Poland . 75 Portugal . 77 Romania . 81 Slovakia . 85 Slovenia . 87 Spain . 91 Turkey . 94 United Kingdom . 96 United States . 100 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents Chapter Page 8. 2014 National Reports from NATO Partner Nations 105 Australia . 106 Austria . 116 Finland . 119 Georgia . 122 Ireland . 124 Japan . 127 Montenegro . 129 New Zealand . 132 Sweden . 135 Switzerland . 136 Ukraine . ..
    [Show full text]
  • US Military Ranks and Units
    US Military Ranks and Units Modern US Military Ranks The table shows current ranks in the US military service branches, but they can serve as a fair guide throughout the twentieth century. Ranks in foreign military services may vary significantly, even when the same names are used. Many European countries use the rank Field Marshal, for example, which is not used in the United States. Pay Army Air Force Marines Navy and Coast Guard Scale Commissioned Officers General of the ** General of the Air Force Fleet Admiral Army Chief of Naval Operations Army Chief of Commandant of the Air Force Chief of Staff Staff Marine Corps O-10 Commandant of the Coast General Guard General General Admiral O-9 Lieutenant General Lieutenant General Lieutenant General Vice Admiral Rear Admiral O-8 Major General Major General Major General (Upper Half) Rear Admiral O-7 Brigadier General Brigadier General Brigadier General (Commodore) O-6 Colonel Colonel Colonel Captain O-5 Lieutenant Colonel Lieutenant Colonel Lieutenant Colonel Commander O-4 Major Major Major Lieutenant Commander O-3 Captain Captain Captain Lieutenant O-2 1st Lieutenant 1st Lieutenant 1st Lieutenant Lieutenant, Junior Grade O-1 2nd Lieutenant 2nd Lieutenant 2nd Lieutenant Ensign Warrant Officers Master Warrant W-5 Chief Warrant Officer 5 Master Warrant Officer Officer 5 W-4 Warrant Officer 4 Chief Warrant Officer 4 Warrant Officer 4 W-3 Warrant Officer 3 Chief Warrant Officer 3 Warrant Officer 3 W-2 Warrant Officer 2 Chief Warrant Officer 2 Warrant Officer 2 W-1 Warrant Officer 1 Warrant Officer Warrant Officer 1 Blank indicates there is no rank at that pay grade.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Rank Equivalency
    Military rank equivalency Although GS civilians do not have military rank by virtue of their GS position, regulations include civilian and military grade equivalencies for pay and protocol comparison purposes. Military rank or civilian grade often have no bearing on supervisory precedence—generally, precedence and authority are guided by situational expertise. For example, a GS-9 is considered comparable to a first lieutenant or lieutenant (junior grade) (O-2), while a GS-15 (top of the General Schedule) is the equivalent grade of a colonel or captain (O-6). Senior Executive Service (SES) and Senior Level grades correspond for protocol purposes to flag and general officers (admirals and generals). Grade equivalencies were created by the U.S. Department of Defense for the purpose of treating civilians serving alongside the Armed Forces who have been captured as prisoners of war according to the Geneva Convention.[6] Geneva Convention Category GS MILITARY Senior Executive V: General Officer O-7 through O-10 Service GS-15 O-6 IV: Field Grade Officer GS-14/GS-13 O-5 GS-12 O-4 O-3 GS-11/GS-10 O-2 and W-4/W- III: Company Grade Officer GS-9/GS-8 3 GS-7 O-1 and W-2/W- 1 II: Non-commissioned Officer/Staff Non-Comissioned GS-6 E-7 through E-9 Officer GS-5 E-6/E-5 GS-4 E-4 I: Enlisted GS-1 through GS-3 E-1 through E-3 Grade equivalencies have also been issued by the U.S. Department of State for other purposes, such as assignment of permanent and transient housing to eligible civilian employees.
    [Show full text]
  • Of the Armed Forces As the New Normal?
    J. Military Stud. 2019; 8(special issue): 16–27 Research Article Open Access Delphine Resteigne* and Philippe Manigart* Boots on the streets: a “policization” of the armed forces as the new normal? DOI 10.2478/jms-2019-0003 and internal security, that is, the military and the police Received September 14, 2018; accepted August 20, 2019 (Tilly 1992). While the mission of the mass armed forces from the 19th to mid-20th centuries was to prepare and Abstract: The article analyses how the boundaries of conduct wars in the service of the nation-states (for postmodern military organizations are changing and how defending their borders or invading other states), police these evolutions affect their relations with the civilian forces were charged with law and order within the borders society. The case of the Belgian Defence and the deploy- of these nation-states. At the end of the 20th century, ment of its military personnel in the streets are used however, this clear division of labour began to blur. As as a case study to illustrate this transformation. Since Keegan (2001: 39) observed, we went, in some ways, back January 2015, in response to the imminent terrorist threat to a situation that existed in Europe in the Middle Ages: in Belgium, military units have been deployed in support of the police to monitor sensitive areas, guard buildings War is escaping from state control, into the hands of bandits and and patrol the streets. The article analyses, first, how the anarchists (…) Therefore the great work of disarming tribes, sects, population reacted to these new “proximity” roles and, warlords and criminals – a principal achievement of monarchs in second, the impact of these homeland deployments on the 17th century and empires in the 19th – threatens to need doing all over again.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping Evolving Internal Roles of the Armed Forces
    SSR PAPER 7 Mapping Evolving Internal Roles of the Armed Forces Albrecht Schnabel and Marc Krupanski DCAF DCAF a centre for security, development and the rule of law SSR PAPER 7 Mapping Evolving Internal Roles of the Armed Forces Albrecht Schnabel and Marc Krupanski DCAF The Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF) is an international foundation whose mission is to assist the international community in pursuing good governance and reform of the security sector. The Centre develops and promotes norms and standards, conducts tailored policy research, identifies good practices and recommendations to promote democratic security sector governance, and provides in‐country advisory support and practical assistance programmes. SSR Papers is a flagship DCAF publication series intended to contribute innovative thinking on important themes and approaches relating to Security Sector Reform (SSR) in the broader context of Security Sector Governance (SSG). Papers provide original and provocative analysis on topics that are directly linked to the challenges of a governance‐driven security sector reform agenda. SSR Papers are intended for researchers, policy‐makers and practitioners involved in this field. ISBN 978‐92‐9222‐228‐4 © 2012 The Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces EDITORS Alan Bryden & Heiner Hänggi PRODUCTION Yury Korobovsky COPY EDITOR Cherry Ekins COVER IMAGE ©Bundeswehr/Rott. Soldiers of the German armed forces and members of the Federal Agency for Technical Relief (THW) secure a dam in an operation to protect against flooding in the Pechau area of the city of Magdeburg at the river Elbe The views expressed are those of the author(s) alone and do not in any way reflect the views of the institutions referred to or represented within this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Commander-In-Chief Power
    Georgetown University Law Center Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW 2008 On the Commander-In-Chief Power David Luban Georgetown University Law Center, [email protected] Georgetown Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 1026302 This paper can be downloaded free of charge from: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/598 http://ssrn.com/abstract=1026302 81 S. Cal. L. Rev. 477-571 (2008) This open-access article is brought to you by the Georgetown Law Library. Posted with permission of the author. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub Part of the Constitutional Law Commons ON THE COMMANDER IN CHIEF POWER ∗ DAVID LUBAN BRADBURY: Obviously, the Hamdan decision, Senator, does implicitly recognize that we’re in a war, that the President’s war powers were triggered by the attacks on the country, and that [the] law of war paradigm applies. That’s what the whole case was about. LEAHY: Was the President right or was he wrong? BRADBURY: It’s under the law of war that we . LEAHY: Was the President right or was he wrong? BRADBURY: . hold the President is always right, Senator. —exchange between a U.S. Senator and a Justice Department 1 lawyer ∗ University Professor and Professor of Law and Philosophy, Georgetown University. I owe thanks to John Partridge and Sebastian Kaplan-Sears for excellent research assistance; to Greg Reichberg, Bill Mengel, and Tim Sellers for clarifying several points of American, Roman, and military history; to Marty Lederman for innumerable helpful and critical conversations; and to Vicki Jackson, Paul Kahn, Larry Solum, and Amy Sepinwall for helpful comments on an earlier draft.
    [Show full text]
  • Deep Cooperation by Belgian Defence : Absorbing the Impact of Declining Defence Budgets on National Capabilities
    This item is the archived peer-reviewed author-version of: Deep cooperation by Belgian defence : absorbing the impact of declining defence budgets on national capabilities Reference: Sauer Tom.- Deep cooperation by Belgian defence : absorbing the impact of declining defence budgets on national capabilities Defence Studies - ISSN 1470-2436 - 15:1(2015), p. 46-62 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1080/14702436.2015.1005900 Institutional repository IRUA Deep cooperation by Belgian defence: absorbing the impact of declining defense budgets on national capabilities Pieter-Jan Parrein and Tom Sauer1 Since the end of the Cold War, Belgian Defence has been used by the Belgian government as an important tool for foreign policy. The accompanying strategic plan 2000-2015, however, that was aimed to adapt the capabilities of the armed forces to the new reality has never been seen as an essential guidance by the Belgian decision-makers. Instead, the Belgian armed forces have been adapted due to budget cuts, and only in a minor way because of strategic considerations. This has resulted in an imbalance between the budget for personnel, operating costs and investments. The result is a smaller but still broad force adapted to collective security/crisis management with land forces specialized in (medium and) light infantry tasks. The air and naval capabilities have been made suitable to the lower intensity of collective security operations although they were designed for the higher part of the violence spectrum. Interestingly, the small Belgian navy has been able to maintain its two major capabilities - maritime mine counter measures vessels, and surface combatants -.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015-International Comparison Deployment Reservists
    BS2015022084 / 9-12-2015 Ministry of Defence >Return address PO Box 20701 2500 ES The Hague Ministry of Defence The Chairman of the House of Representatives Plein 4 MPC 58 B of the States General PO Box 20701 Plein 2 2500 ES The Hague 2511 CR The Hague www.defensie.nl The Netherlands Our reference BS2015022084 Appendices : 2 Date 16 December 2015 Subject International comparison of deployment of reservists Please quote the date, our reference and the subject when replying. Introduction Earlier this year, the standing committee for the Ministry of Defence sent me a request (reference 34000-X-34/2015D03829) to update the international comparative study into the way the reservists of 2009 are deployed (Parliamentary Paper 32 123 X, no. 32). In addition to the countries the study focused on at the time, i.e. Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom and the United States, the request was made to also include Belgium and Germany. Furthermore, it was requested that the question be addressed regarding the extent to which the deployment of reservists leads to an increase in effectiveness and to discuss “the alternative deployment of reserved funds for financial compensation for employers of deployed reservists.” Outcomes of the country comparison In 2009, the Ministry of Defence had predominantly examined general characteristics, such as the size of the armed forces, general tasks of reservists, the categories of reservists and their actual deployment. The new study has also examined the experiences and developments with respect to the reservists. The four countries in the 2009 study were approached again to outline the developments of the last few years.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Communication of NATO Enhanced Forward Presence Battle Group in Lithuania by Assessment of the Parties Involved in the Process
    ISSN 2335-870X LITHUANIAN ANNUAL STRATEGIC REVIEW 2020 Volume 18 67 Vytenis Miliušas* The Strategic Communication Department of the Lithuanian Armed Forces Viktor Denisenko** The General Jonas Žemaitis Military Academy of Lithuania Strategic Communication of NATO Enhanced Forward Presence Battle Group in Lithuania by Assessment of the Parties Involved in the Process The article presents the study on strategic communication of NATO Enhanced Forward Presence Battle Group in Lithuania and assessment of the effectiveness thereof by the representatives of the parties involved in the process. The academic research of this issue has been scarce, especially in the case of focussing on the aspects of strategic communication, despite the fact that the battle groups have been deployed to the Baltic States and Poland in early 2017. Assessments by the representatives of the parties involved in the process indicate certain trends in communications, enable answering the question regarding the direction to be taken in respect of the communications of the battle group and what communication goals are being implemented. Introduction NATO Enhanced Forward Presence was deployed to the Baltic States and Poland more than two years ago in response to Russia’s aggression against Ukraine. This step was taken as means of military deterrence against Russia. However, the question remains as to what place is taken by NATO’s strate- gic communication in deterrence actions and how it is implemented by using NATO Enhanced Forward Presence Battle Group in Lithuania. The issue of military deterrence of Russia has once again become rele- vant as a result of the Kremlin’s actions. According to George Weigel, Russia * Cpt.
    [Show full text]
  • Czech Armed Forces
    CZECH ARMED FORCES 2019 © The Ministry of Defence of the Czech Republic − MHI Prague, 2020 ISBN 978-80-7278-791-3 CZECH ARMED FORCES 2019 2 INTRODUCTION Dear citizens, soldiers, airmen and defence civilians, for the Czech Armed Forces, the year 2019 saw changes associated with meeting the Armed Forces’ missions and its key development priorities. Those were defined in two key policies authorised by the Government in the last year – the Longterm Perspective for Defence 2035, which provides the primary guidance for defence planning and for subordinate policies, and the Czech Armed Forces Development Concept 2030 that builds on the Longterm Perspective for Defence. After thirty years from the victory of democracy and twenty years in the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation, the Czech Armed Forces finds itself at yet another turning point. The changes have been primarily relative to the structure of the Armed Forces, which transformed to ensure an optimal system of command and control. In addition, we are developing new capabilities and besides the Land Forces, the Air Force and the Special Forces, the Cyber Forces and Territorial Forces were formed. We have preparations underway for the largest armaments replacement programs in the history of the Czech Armed Forces. Those steps would however be futile without committed personnel on high quality training standards. That is why we pay a high attention to the recruitment of new soldiers, airmen and members of the Active Reserve Component. We are delivering on the Armed Forces’ primary mission, which is to ensure the defence of the state and the Czech citizens and consistently perform our commitments to NATO, EU and the UN, which entail new challenges for us.
    [Show full text]
  • Lieutenant-General Rudy Debaene
    [email protected] LIEUTENANT-GENERAL RUDY DEBAENE, MSC +32 2 4418190 DIRECTOR GENERAL MATERIAL RESOURCES (DGMR) Married to Monique Cuyvers NATIONAL ARMAMENT DIRECTOR (NAD) One son: Ruben Lives in Olmen Bio Rudy DEBAENE was born in Oostende on the 9th May 1960. He completed his high- school education at the Sint-Pauluscollege in Houthalen and graduated in June 1978 in Latin and Mathematics. In August 1978, he joined the Royal Military Academy with the 133rd Polytechnic Promotion. He graduated with a Master of Science (mechanics and ballistics) in 1983 and was promoted to Second-Lieutenant. Experience Platoon leader and technical officer, Werl – BRD (1984–1986) After he completed his training course as a Logistics Officer in Heverlee and Tournai, he began his active career in 1984 in Werl (Germany) with the 4th Maintenance Company. There he was appointed platoon leader with responsibility for vehicle maintenance and technical officer. Academic assistant to the Chair of Armament and Ballistics, Brussels (1986–1989) From July 1986 to August 1989, he served as academic assistant to the Chair of Armament and Ballistics at the Royal Military Academy with overall responsibility for the Ballistics Laboratory. During the academic year 1988-1989, he led the General Course in Ballistics. Company Commander, Lüdenscheid – BRD (1989–1992) In 1989 he returned to the Belgian Armed Forces in Germany as Company Commander of the 202nd Maintenance Company of the 18th Logistic Battalion in Lüdenscheid. Project Officer, Tervuren (1993–1997) After successfully completing the Candidate Major Staff Course at the Royal Institute of Defence in July 1993, Captain Debaene was assigned as Programme Manager for the Database Management System at the former Centre for Information Treatment of the Army in Tervuren.
    [Show full text]