Vistara Non-Invasive Prenatal Screen
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Repercussions of Inborn Errors of Immunity on Growth☆ Jornal De Pediatria, Vol
Jornal de Pediatria ISSN: 0021-7557 ISSN: 1678-4782 Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria Goudouris, Ekaterini Simões; Segundo, Gesmar Rodrigues Silva; Poli, Cecilia Repercussions of inborn errors of immunity on growth☆ Jornal de Pediatria, vol. 95, no. 1, Suppl., 2019, pp. S49-S58 Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2018.11.006 Available in: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=399759353007 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System Redalyc More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America and the Caribbean, Spain and Journal's webpage in redalyc.org Portugal Project academic non-profit, developed under the open access initiative J Pediatr (Rio J). 2019;95(S1):S49---S58 www.jped.com.br REVIEW ARTICLE ଝ Repercussions of inborn errors of immunity on growth a,b,∗ c,d e Ekaterini Simões Goudouris , Gesmar Rodrigues Silva Segundo , Cecilia Poli a Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Pediatria, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil b Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Instituto de Puericultura e Pediatria Martagão Gesteira (IPPMG), Curso de Especializac¸ão em Alergia e Imunologia Clínica, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil c Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU), Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Pediatria, Uberlândia, MG, Brazil d Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU), Hospital das Clínicas, Programa de Residência Médica em Alergia e Imunologia Pediátrica, Uberlândia, MG, Brazil e Universidad del Desarrollo, -
Megalencephaly and Macrocephaly
277 Megalencephaly and Macrocephaly KellenD.Winden,MD,PhD1 Christopher J. Yuskaitis, MD, PhD1 Annapurna Poduri, MD, MPH2 1 Department of Neurology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Address for correspondence Annapurna Poduri, Epilepsy Genetics Massachusetts Program, Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Electrophysiology, 2 Epilepsy Genetics Program, Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Department of Neurology, Fegan 9, Boston Children’s Hospital, 300 Electrophysiology, Department of Neurology, Boston Children’s Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115 Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (e-mail: [email protected]). Semin Neurol 2015;35:277–287. Abstract Megalencephaly is a developmental disorder characterized by brain overgrowth secondary to increased size and/or numbers of neurons and glia. These disorders can be divided into metabolic and developmental categories based on their molecular etiologies. Metabolic megalencephalies are mostly caused by genetic defects in cellular metabolism, whereas developmental megalencephalies have recently been shown to be caused by alterations in signaling pathways that regulate neuronal replication, growth, and migration. These disorders often lead to epilepsy, developmental disabilities, and Keywords behavioral problems; specific disorders have associations with overgrowth or abnor- ► megalencephaly malities in other tissues. The molecular underpinnings of many of these disorders are ► hemimegalencephaly now understood, providing insight into how dysregulation of critical pathways leads to ► -
The First Non-Invasive Prenatal Test That Screens for Single-Gene Disorders
The first non-invasive prenatal test that screens for single-gene disorders the evolution of NIPT A non-invasive prenatal test that screens multiple genes for mutations causing severe genetic disorders in the fetus analyses circulating cell- free fetal DNA (cfDNA) from a maternal blood sample. The test is performed after 10 weeks of pregnancy. works as a complementary screen to traditional and genome- wide NIPT . It screens for several life-altering genetic disorders that are not screened with current NIPT technology, allowing a complete picture of the risk of a pregnancy being affected by a genetic disorder. 2 facilitates early diagnosis of single-gene disorders. It involves 3 different levels of screening: This test screens for 5 common inherited recessive genetic disorders, such as Cystic Fibrosis, Beta-Thalassemia, Sickle INHERITED cell anaemia, Deafness autosomal recessive type 1A, Deafness autosomal recessive type 1B. Genes screened: CFTR, CX26 (GJB2), CX30 (GJB6), HBB This test screens for 44 severe genetic disorders due to de novo mutations (a gene mutation that is not inherited) in 25 genes DE NOVO Genes screened: ASXL1, BRAF, CBL, CHD7, COL1A1, COL1A2 , COL2A1, FGFR2, FGFR3, HDAC8, JAG1, KRAS, MAP2K1, MAP2K2, MECP2, NIPBL, NRAS, NSD1, PTPN11, RAF1, RIT1, SETBP1, SHOC2, SIX3, SOS1 This test screens for both inherited and de novo single-gene disorders and represents a combination of the tests INHERITED COMPLETE and DE NOVO providing a complete picture of the pregnancy risk. 3 allows detection of common inherited genetic disorders in INHERITED the fetus GENE GENETIC DISORDER CFTR Cystic Fibrosis CX26 (GJB2) Deafness autosomal recessive type 1A CX30 (GJB6) Deafness autosomal recessive type 1B HBB Beta-Thalassemia HBB Sickle cell anemia The inherited recessive disorders screened by INHERITED are the most common in the European population 4 identifies fetal conditions that could be missed by traditional DE NOVO prenatal screening. -
Craniosynostosis Genetics: the Mystery Unfolds
Review Article Craniosynostosis genetics: The mystery unfolds Inusha Panigrahi Department of Pediatrics, Genetic and Metabolic Unit, Advanced Pediatric Center, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India The syndromes associated with craniosynostosis Craniosynsostosis syndromes exhibit considerable phenotypic and genetic heterogeneity. Sagittal synostosis include Apert syndrome, Crouzon syndrome, Greig is common form of isolated craniosynostosis. The cephalopolysyndactyly, and Saethre-Chotzen syndrome. sutures involved, the shape of the skull and associated malformations give a clue to the specific diagnosis. It is genetically heterogeneous disorder with mutation Crouzon syndrome is one of the most common of the identifi ed in several genes, predominantly the fi broblast craniosynostosis syndromes. Apert syndrome accounts for growth factor receptor genes.[3,4] Saethre-Chotzen 4.5% of all craniosynostoses and is one of the most serious of these syndromes. Most syndromic craniosynostosis syndrome and craniosynostosis (Boston-type) arise require multidisciplinary management. The following review from mutations in the Twist and muscle segment provides a brief appraisal of the various genes involved in craniosynostosis syndromes, and an approach to diagnosis homeobox 2 (MSX2) transcription factors, respectively. and genetic counseling. Rates of neuropsychological defi cits range from 35 to Key words: Apert syndrome, FGFR2 mutations, 50% in school-aged children with isolated single suture hydrocephalus, plagiocephaly, sutural synostosis, craniosynostosis.[5] Secondary effects of craniosynostosis syndromes may include vision problems and increased intracranial pressure, among others. Patients with TWIST gene Introduction mutations may have more ophthalmic abnormalities, including more strabismus, ptosis, and amblyopia.[6] The following discussion gives a comprehensive review Craniosynostosis, premature suture fusion, is one of of different disorders presenting with craniosynostosis, the most common craniofacial anomalies with incidence their diagnosis, and genetic counseling. -
Blueprint Genetics Craniosynostosis Panel
Craniosynostosis Panel Test code: MA2901 Is a 38 gene panel that includes assessment of non-coding variants. Is ideal for patients with craniosynostosis. About Craniosynostosis Craniosynostosis is defined as the premature fusion of one or more cranial sutures leading to secondary distortion of skull shape. It may result from a primary defect of ossification (primary craniosynostosis) or, more commonly, from a failure of brain growth (secondary craniosynostosis). Premature closure of the sutures (fibrous joints) causes the pressure inside of the head to increase and the skull or facial bones to change from a normal, symmetrical appearance resulting in skull deformities with a variable presentation. Craniosynostosis may occur in an isolated setting or as part of a syndrome with a variety of inheritance patterns and reccurrence risks. Craniosynostosis occurs in 1/2,200 live births. Availability 4 weeks Gene Set Description Genes in the Craniosynostosis Panel and their clinical significance Gene Associated phenotypes Inheritance ClinVar HGMD ALPL Odontohypophosphatasia, Hypophosphatasia perinatal lethal, AD/AR 78 291 infantile, juvenile and adult forms ALX3 Frontonasal dysplasia type 1 AR 8 8 ALX4 Frontonasal dysplasia type 2, Parietal foramina AD/AR 15 24 BMP4 Microphthalmia, syndromic, Orofacial cleft AD 8 39 CDC45 Meier-Gorlin syndrome 7 AR 10 19 EDNRB Hirschsprung disease, ABCD syndrome, Waardenburg syndrome AD/AR 12 66 EFNB1 Craniofrontonasal dysplasia XL 28 116 ERF Craniosynostosis 4 AD 17 16 ESCO2 SC phocomelia syndrome, Roberts syndrome -
A Curated Gene List for Reporting Results of Newborn Genomic Sequencing
© American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE A curated gene list for reporting results of newborn genomic sequencing Ozge Ceyhan-Birsoy, PhD1,2,3, Kalotina Machini, PhD1,2,3, Matthew S. Lebo, PhD1,2,3, Tim W. Yu, MD3,4,5, Pankaj B. Agrawal, MD, MMSC3,4,6, Richard B. Parad, MD, MPH3,7, Ingrid A. Holm, MD, MPH3,4, Amy McGuire, PhD8, Robert C. Green, MD, MPH3,9,10, Alan H. Beggs, PhD3,4, Heidi L. Rehm, PhD1,2,3,10; for the BabySeq Project Purpose: Genomic sequencing (GS) for newborns may enable detec- of newborn GS (nGS), and used our curated list for the first 15 new- tion of conditions for which early knowledge can improve health out- borns sequenced in this project. comes. One of the major challenges hindering its broader application Results: Here, we present our curated list for 1,514 gene–disease is the time it takes to assess the clinical relevance of detected variants associations. Overall, 954 genes met our criteria for return in nGS. and the genes they impact so that disease risk is reported appropri- This reference list eliminated manual assessment for 41% of rare vari- ately. ants identified in 15 newborns. Methods: To facilitate rapid interpretation of GS results in new- Conclusion: Our list provides a resource that can assist in guiding borns, we curated a catalog of genes with putative pediatric relevance the interpretive scope of clinical GS for newborns and potentially for their validity based on the ClinGen clinical validity classification other populations. framework criteria, age of onset, penetrance, and mode of inheri- tance through systematic evaluation of published evidence. -
Metacarpophalangeal Pattern Profile Analysis in Sotos Syndrome
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE HHS Public Access provided by IUPUIScholarWorks Author manuscript Author ManuscriptAuthor Manuscript Author Am J Med Manuscript Author Genet. Author Manuscript Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 September 12. Published in final edited form as: Am J Med Genet. 1985 April ; 20(4): 625–629. doi:10.1002/ajmg.1320200408. Metacarpophalangeal Pattern Profile Analysis in Sotos Syndrome Merlin G. Butler, Department of Biology, University of Notre Dame and North Central Regional Genetics Center, Memorial Hospital, South Bend, Indiana Department of Medical Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine F. John Meaney, Department of Medical Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine Genetic Diseases Section, Indiana State Board of Health, Indianapolis Smita Kittur, Pediatric Genetics Department, Children’s Medical and Surgical Center, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore Joseph H. Hersh, and Child Evaluation Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Louisville School of Medicine Lusia Hornstein Cincinnati Center for Developmental Disorders, Children’s Hospital Medical Center Abstract The metacarpophalangeal pattern profile (MCPP) was analyzed on 16 Sotos syndrome patients. A mean Sotos syndrome profile was produced. Correlation studies confirm clinical homogeneity of Sotos syndrome individuals. Discriminant analysis of Sotos syndrome patients and normal individuals produces a function of two MCPP variables and age, which may provide a useful tool for diagnosis. Keywords Sotos syndrome; metacarpophalangeal pattern profile (MCPP); discriminant analysis; correlation studies INTRODUCTION Sotos syndrome, or cerebral gigantism, was first described by Sotos et al [1964]; at least 100 cases were reported subsequently. This syndrome is characterized by large size at birth, large hands and feet, advanced osseous maturation, macrocephaly with prominent forehead and Address reprint requests to Merlin G. -
Diagnostic Utility of Genome-Wide DNA Methylation Analysis in Mendelian Neurodevelopmental Disorders
International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Diagnostic Utility of Genome-Wide DNA Methylation Analysis in Mendelian Neurodevelopmental Disorders Sadegheh Haghshenas 1,2 , Pratibha Bhai 2, Erfan Aref-Eshghi 3 and Bekim Sadikovic 1,2,4,* 1 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Western University, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada; [email protected] 2 Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Molecular Diagnostics Division, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON N6A 5W9, Canada; [email protected] 3 Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; [email protected] 4 Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON N6A 5C1, Canada * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 22 November 2020; Accepted: 4 December 2020; Published: 6 December 2020 Abstract: Mendelian neurodevelopmental disorders customarily present with complex and overlapping symptoms, complicating the clinical diagnosis. Individuals with a growing number of the so-called rare disorders exhibit unique, disorder-specific DNA methylation patterns, consequent to the underlying gene defects. Besides providing insights to the pathophysiology and molecular biology of these disorders, we can use these epigenetic patterns as functional biomarkers for the screening and diagnosis of these conditions. This review summarizes our current understanding of DNA methylation episignatures in rare disorders and describes the underlying technology and analytical approaches. We discuss the computational parameters, including statistical and machine learning methods, used for the screening and classification of genetic variants of uncertain clinical significance. Describing the rationale and principles applied to the specific computational models that are used to develop and adapt the DNA methylation episignatures for the diagnosis of rare disorders, we highlight the opportunities and challenges in this emerging branch of diagnostic medicine. -
Regional Genetic Consultation Service
Regional Genetic Consultation Service Contract 5889BD01 July 1, 2018 through June 30, 2019 Congenital & Inherited Disorders Division of Health Promotion & Chronic Disease Prevention, Phone: 1-800-383-3826 http://idph.iowa.gov/genetics Regional Genetic Consultation Service: A contract established by IDPH in the Division of Health Promotion & Chronic Disease Prevention, Contract # 5888BD01 Administrative Code, Chapter 4:641-4.5(136A) Iowa Department of Public Health Advancing Health Through the Generations Kimberly Reynolds Adam Gregg Gerd Clabaugh Governor Lt. Governor Director Authorized State Official for this contract: Brenda Dobson, Director, Division of Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention (515) 281-7769 University of Iowa Stead Family Department of Pediatrics (319) 356-2675 Hatem El-Shanti, MD, Division Director John A. Bernat, MD, PhD, Clinical Director Hannah Bombei, MS, CGC, Program Coordinator Page | 2 Congenital & Inherited Disorders Division of Health Promotion & Chronic Disease Prevention, Phone: 800-383-3826 http://idph.iowa.gov/genetics In collaboration with the Iowa Department of Public Health & The Stead Family Department of Pediatrics Division of Medical Genetics & Genomics University of Iowa Stead Family Children’s Hospital & Clinical Outreach Services University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics Page | 3 What is the Regional Genetic Consultation Service? Iowa Administrative Code 641—4.5(136A) Regional Genetic Consultation Service (RGCS). This program provides comprehensive genetic and genomic services statewide through outreach clinics. 4.5(1) Provision of comprehensive genetic and genomic services. The department shall contract with the Division of Medical Genetics & Genomics within the Stead Family Department of Pediatrics at the University of Iowa to provide genetic and genomic health care and education outreach services for individuals and families within Iowa. -
Abstracts Books 2014
TWENTY-FIFTH EUROPEAN MEETING ON DYSMORPHOLOGY 10 – 12 SEPTEMBER 2014 25th EUROPEAN MEETING ON DYSMORPHOLOGY LE BISCHENBERG WEDNESDAY 10th SEPTEMBER 5 p.m. to 7.30 p.m. Registration 7.30 p.m. to 8.30 p.m. Welcome reception 8.30 p.m. Dinner 9.30 p.m. Unknown THURSDAY 11th SEPTEMBER 8.15 a.m. Opening address 8.30 a.m. to 1.00 p.m. First session 1.00 p.m. Lunch 2.30 p.m. to 7.00 p.m. Second and third sessions 8.00 p.m. Dinner 9.00 p.m. to 11.00 p.m. Unknown FRIDAY 12th SEPTEMBER 8.30 a.m. to 1.00 p.m. Fourth and fifth sessions 1.00 p.m. Lunch 2.30 p.m. to 6.00 p.m. Sixth and seventh sessions 7.30 p.m. Dinner SATURDAY 13th SEPTEMBER Breakfast – Departure Note: This program is tentative and may be modified. WEDNESDAY 10th SEPTEMBER 9.30 UNKNOWN SESSION Chair: FRYNS J.P. H. VAN ESCH Case 1 H. VAN ESCH Case 2 H. JILANI, S. HIZEM, I. REJEB, F. DZIRI AND L. BEN JEMAA Developmental delay, dysmorphic features and hirsutism in a Tunisian girl. Cornelia de Lange syndrome? L. VAN MALDERGEM, C. CABROL, B. LOEYS, M. SALEH, Y. BERNARD, L. CHAMARD AND J. PIARD Megalophthalmos and thoracic great vessels aneurisms E. SCHAEFER AND Y. HERENGER An unknown diagnosis associating facial dysmorphism, developmental delay, posterior urethral valves and severe constipation P. RUMP AND T. VAN ESSEN What’s in the name G. MUBUNGU, A. LUMAKA, K. -
Genetic Disorder
Genetic disorder Single gene disorder Prevalence of some single gene disorders[citation needed] A single gene disorder is the result of a single mutated gene. Disorder Prevalence (approximate) There are estimated to be over 4000 human diseases caused Autosomal dominant by single gene defects. Single gene disorders can be passed Familial hypercholesterolemia 1 in 500 on to subsequent generations in several ways. Genomic Polycystic kidney disease 1 in 1250 imprinting and uniparental disomy, however, may affect Hereditary spherocytosis 1 in 5,000 inheritance patterns. The divisions between recessive [2] Marfan syndrome 1 in 4,000 and dominant types are not "hard and fast" although the [3] Huntington disease 1 in 15,000 divisions between autosomal and X-linked types are (since Autosomal recessive the latter types are distinguished purely based on 1 in 625 the chromosomal location of Sickle cell anemia the gene). For example, (African Americans) achondroplasia is typically 1 in 2,000 considered a dominant Cystic fibrosis disorder, but children with two (Caucasians) genes for achondroplasia have a severe skeletal disorder that 1 in 3,000 Tay-Sachs disease achondroplasics could be (American Jews) viewed as carriers of. Sickle- cell anemia is also considered a Phenylketonuria 1 in 12,000 recessive condition, but heterozygous carriers have Mucopolysaccharidoses 1 in 25,000 increased immunity to malaria in early childhood, which could Glycogen storage diseases 1 in 50,000 be described as a related [citation needed] dominant condition. Galactosemia -
Jaw Keratocysts and Sotos Syndrome
International Journal on Oral Health Jaw Keratocysts and Sotos Syndrome Case Report Volume 1 Issue 2- 2021 Author Details Jin Fei Yeo and Philip McLoughlin* Faculty of Dentistry, National University Centre for Oral Health Singapore, Singapore *Corresponding author Philip McLoughlin, Discipline of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, National University Centre for Oral Health Singapore, 9 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore Article History Received: June 05, 2021 Accepted: June 14, 2021 Published: June 15, 2021 Abstract Sotos syndrome, described by Sotos et al. [1], is characterized by excessive growth during childhood, macrocephaly, distinctive facial appearance and learning disability. The disorder is largely caused by mutations or deletions in the NSD1 gene. The typical facial gestalt includes macrodolichocephaly with frontal bossing, front-parietal sparseness of hair, apparent hypertelorism, down slanting palpebral in his jaw bones, a previously unreported oral manifestation, out with a syndromic context. fissures, and facial flushing. This paper discusses a case of Sotos syndrome in an adolescent male with multiple odontogenic keratocysts Introduction On examination, he was a generally healthy and rather active patient. He was very tall with macrocephaly, large hands and feet, and Sotos syndrome (Cerebral gigantism) is a rare genetic childhood hypertelorism with slightly down-slanted eyes. He also suffered ASD/ overgrowth condition described in 1964 by Sotos et al. [1]. This autism and mild mental hypo development with noticeable speech syndrome is characterized by excessive growth during childhood, impairment. On clinical assessment he was found to have a number of macrocephaly, distinctive facial appearance and learning disability. unerupted teeth, with fluctuant expansion of the maxilla and mandible The disorder is caused by mutations or 5q35 microdeletions in the at those sites.