Sudden Oak Death Economic Impact Assessment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sudden Oak Death Economic Impact Assessment Sudden Oak Death: Economic Impact Assessment Prepared by: Highland Economics | Mason, Bruce & Girard, Inc. 2/15/2019 Prepared for: Oregon Department of Forestry Sudden Oak Death Economic Impact Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. 5 2.0 Background .......................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Pathology and Ecology ..................................................................................................... 8 2.2 Regulatory Environment .................................................................................................. 9 2.3 Treatment Progress ........................................................................................................ 10 2.4 Disease Model ................................................................................................................ 12 2.4.1 Susceptible-infected-removed SOD expansion model ........................................... 13 2.4.2 Spatial regression SOD expansion model ............................................................... 13 2.5 Sources of timber industry information ......................................................................... 17 2.6 Source of information for non-timber SOD impacts ...................................................... 17 3.0 SOD Progression ................................................................................................................. 18 3.1 Current Extent ................................................................................................................ 18 3.1 Future Dispersal ............................................................................................................. 18 3.1.1 Alternative A: Continue Current Management ...................................................... 18 3.1.2 Alternative B: Discontinue Management ............................................................... 20 3.1.3 Alternative C: Emphasize EU1 Treatment ............................................................... 20 4.0 Timber Industry Impacts .................................................................................................... 22 4.1 Current Impacts .............................................................................................................. 22 4.1.1 Timber harvest ........................................................................................................ 22 4.1.2 Jobs, Wages, and Tax Revenue ............................................................................... 24 4.1.3 Indirect and Induced Impacts ................................................................................. 28 4.1.4 Logging and Transport Logistics .............................................................................. 29 4.1.5 Sale administration ................................................................................................. 30 4.1.6 Export ...................................................................................................................... 30 4.1.7 Aggregate Current SOD Impacts ............................................................................. 33 4.2 Future Impacts ............................................................................................................... 34 4.2.1 Timber harvest ........................................................................................................ 38 4.2.2 Jobs, Wages, and Tax Revenue ............................................................................... 39 i Sudden Oak Death Economic Impact Assessment 4.2.3 Logging Logistics and Sale administration .............................................................. 41 4.2.4 Export ...................................................................................................................... 41 4.2.5 Alternative A: .......................................................................................................... 46 4.2.6 Alternative B: .......................................................................................................... 47 4.2.7 Alternative C: .......................................................................................................... 49 4.2.8 Aggregate Future SOD Impacts ............................................................................... 50 5.0 Non-Timber Impacts .......................................................................................................... 52 5.1 Tribal cultural values ...................................................................................................... 52 5.1.1 Tribal cultural values: .............................................................................................. 52 5.1.2 Current SOD Impacts on Tribal Cultural Values ...................................................... 54 5.1.3 Future SOD impacts on Tribal cultural values ......................................................... 55 5.2 SOD treatment activities ................................................................................................ 56 5.2.1 Current economic impacts of SOD treatment ........................................................ 56 5.2.2 Future SOD treatment impacts ............................................................................... 56 5.3 Property valuation and aesthetics ................................................................................. 57 5.3.1 Current impacts on aesthetic value ........................................................................ 59 5.3.2 Future aesthetic impacts ........................................................................................ 62 5.4 Public safety hazards ...................................................................................................... 63 5.4.1 Current SOD hazard impacts ................................................................................... 63 5.4.2 Future hazard impacts ............................................................................................ 64 5.5 Recreation and tourism .................................................................................................. 65 5.5.1 Recreation ............................................................................................................... 65 5.5.2 Tourism ................................................................................................................... 66 5.5.3 Current impacts ...................................................................................................... 68 5.5.4 Future impacts ........................................................................................................ 70 5.6 Ecological effects of SOD ................................................................................................ 71 5.6.1 Current SOD ecological impacts.............................................................................. 71 5.6.2 Future impacts ........................................................................................................ 73 5.7 Wildfire risk .................................................................................................................... 76 5.8 Subsistence ..................................................................................................................... 77 6.0 Conclusions ........................................................................................................................ 78 ii Sudden Oak Death Economic Impact Assessment 7.0 References ......................................................................................................................... 83 8.0 Appendix ............................................................................................................................ 89 8.1 Quarantine Definition .................................................................................................... 89 8.2 Disease Model Implementation ..................................................................................... 94 8.3 Timber Harvest ............................................................................................................... 98 8.4 Timber Industry Tax Revenue ...................................................................................... 101 8.5 Baseline Timber Industry Forecast ............................................................................... 107 8.6 Tribal Land Ownership Boundaries .............................................................................. 109 iii Sudden Oak Death Economic Impact Assessment Abbreviations APHIS: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service BLS: Bureau of Labor Statistics GIA: Generally Infested Area LEMMA: Landscape Ecology, Modeling, Mapping, and Analysis MBF: Thousand Board Feet (timber volume unit) MMBF: Million Board Feet (timber volume unit) ODA: Oregon Department of Agriculture ODF: Oregon Department of Forestry OFRI: Oregon Forest Resources Institute Pr: Phytophthora ramorum, oomycete fungal pathogen responsible for causing SOD. PoCB: Port of Coos Bay QCEW: Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages QZ: Quarantine Zone SOD: Sudden Oak Death USDA: United States Department of Agriculture USFS: United States Forest Service iv Sudden Oak Death Economic Impact Assessment 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report estimates economic impacts of Sudden Oak Death (SOD) in southwest
Recommended publications
  • Ocean Shore Management Plan
    Ocean Shore Management Plan Oregon Parks and Recreation Department January 2005 Ocean Shore Management Plan Oregon Parks and Recreation Department January 2005 Oregon Parks and Recreation Department Planning Section 725 Summer Street NE Suite C Salem Oregon 97301 Kathy Schutt: Project Manager Contributions by OPRD staff: Michelle Michaud Terry Bergerson Nancy Niedernhofer Jean Thompson Robert Smith Steve Williams Tammy Baumann Coastal Area and Park Managers Table of Contents Planning for Oregon’s Ocean Shore: Executive Summary .......................................................................... 1 Chapter One Introduction.................................................................................................................. 9 Chapter Two Ocean Shore Management Goals.............................................................................19 Chapter Three Balancing the Demands: Natural Resource Management .......................................23 Chapter Four Balancing the Demands: Cultural/Historic Resource Management .........................29 Chapter Five Balancing the Demands: Scenic Resource Management.........................................33 Chapter Six Balancing the Demands: Recreational Use and Management .................................39 Chapter Seven Beach Access............................................................................................................57 Chapter Eight Beach Safety .............................................................................................................71
    [Show full text]
  • Growing up Indian: an Emic Perspective
    GROWING UP INDIAN: AN EMIC PERSPECTIVE By GEORGE BUNDY WASSON, JR. A DISSERTATION Presented to the Department of Anthropology and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy june 2001 ii "Growing Up Indian: An Ernie Perspective," a dissertation prepared by George B. Wasson, Jr. in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Anthropology. This dissertation is approved and accepted by: Committee in charge: Dr. jon M. Erlandson, Chair Dr. C. Melvin Aikens Dr. Madonna L. Moss Dr. Rennard Strickland (outside member) Dr. Barre Toelken Accepted by: ------------------------------�------------------ Dean of the Graduate School iii Copyright 2001 George B. Wasson, Jr. iv An Abstract of the Dissertation of George Bundy Wasson, Jr. for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Anthropology to be taken June 2001 Title: GROWING UP INDIAN: AN EMIC PERSPECTN E Approved: My dissertation, GROWING UP INDIAN: AN EMIC PERSPECTN E describes the historical and contemporary experiences of the Coquille Indian Tribe and their close neighbors (as manifested in my own family), in relation to their shared cultures, languages, and spiritual practices. I relate various tribal reactions to the tragedy of cultural genocide as experienced by those indigenous groups within the "Black Hole" of Southwest Oregon. My desire is to provide an "inside" (ernie) perspective on the history and cultural changes of Southwest Oregon. I explain Native responses to living primarily in a non-Indian world, after the nearly total loss of aboriginal Coquelle culture and tribal identity through v decimation by disease, warfare, extermination, and cultural genocide through the educational policies of the Bureau of Indian Affairs, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Ore Bin / Oregon Geology Magazine / Journal
    The ORE BIN Volume 24, No.8 August, 1962 GEOLOGY OF THE CAPE BLANCO AREA, SOUTHWEST OREGON By R. H. Dott, Jr. * Introduction Cape Blanco, the most westerly headland in Oregon, encompasses some critical geological relationships important to the understanding of the western Klamath-Siskiyou region. The cape was named by 16th century Spanish sailors, as were many other Oregon headlands such as Cape Se­ bastian and Cape Ferrelo. Figure 1 shows the location of the Cape Blanco area, which includes also Blacklock Point, lying 3 miles to the northeast within the undeveloped Newburgh State Park. Cape Blanco and Blacklock Point lie along the northwest landward end of a great sheared zone which is at least one mile wide. Though Ce­ nozoic deposits mask most of the region to the east and south, the zone is considered co-extensive with the previously named Port Orford shear zone exposed 8 miles southeast of the cape (Koch and others, 1961). This is one of a series of such zones which lace the southwest Oregon coast just as they do in the northern California Coast Ranges (figure 1). The bedrock types and ages exposed in the area are extremely varied, ranging from the Dothan? Formation of uncertain but presumably Jurassic age to extensive Cenozoic deposits. Particularly noteworthy is the rec­ ognition of Late Cretaceous strata north of Blacklock Point (Koch and others, 1961). These, together with the Dothan? Formation and rocks in Cape Blanco, were all mapped as the "Myrtle formation" by Diller (1903). Only those in Cape Blanco are here regarded as representing true equiv­ alents of the Myrtle Group as defined by Imlay and others (1959).
    [Show full text]
  • 9. Humbug Mountain State Park to Pistol River State Scenic Viewpoint
    OREGON COAST TRAIL Finalized Design Submittal Boardman Trail Project Logo - Oregon Coast Trail Submitted by Denise Dahn, Dahn Design 2/1/04 Actual size variable OREGON COAST TRAIL OREGON COAST TRAIL OREGON COAST TRAIL OREGON COAST TRAIL TRAIL TRAIL COAST COAST COAST OREGON COAST TRAIL OREGON OREGON TRAIL OREGON OREGON COAST TRAIL OREGON COAST TRAIL OREGON COAST TRAIL 9. Humbug Mountain State Park to Finalized Design Submittal Boardman Trail Project Logo - Oregon Coast Trail Humbug Mountain Submitted by Denise Dahn, Dahn Design 2/1/04 Pistol River State Scenic Viewpoint OREGON Actual size variable Finalized Design Submittal State ParkBoardman Trail Project Logo - Oregon Coast Trail Submitted by Denise Dahn, Dahn Design 2/1/04 Actual size COASTvariable OREGON COAST TRAIL OREGON COAST TRAIL OREGON COAST TRAIL OREGON COAST TRAIL TRAIL OREGON COAST TRAIL OREGON COAST TRAIL OREGON COAST TRAIL L T AIL RAI T TR AS T S CO OA C COAST L E G E N D OREGON EGON COAST OREGON COAST TRAIL OR OREGON TRAIL TRAIL OREGON L AIL RAI T TR COAST OREGON OAST C COAST COAST GON TRAIL E GON OREGON COAST TRAIL OR OREGON TRAIL ORE OREGON OREGON COAST COAST TRAIL Oregon Coast Trail TRAIL OREGON COAST TRAIL Beach Trail OREGON COAST TRAIL Trail on Road/Hard Surface Alternate Route OREGON OREGON COAST TRAIL Roads COASTArizona TRAIL Beach 1 Trail Direction Information State Park Boundary Interpretive Exhibit Information Camping Sisters Rock 0 1.25 2.5 N miles miles PLEASE NOTE: The trail route may At Euchre Creek, hike along the beach to 1 change due to safety issues, road Nesika Beach.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Recent Physical Changes of the Oregon Coast
    rOREGON STATE UNIVERS TY LIBRARIES IIIIII 111IIIII1 IIII III 12 0002098016 65458 .8 05 cop .3 FINAL RE PORT (Report on an investigation carried out under Contract Nonr-2771 (04), Project NR 388-062, between the University of Oregon and the Office of Naval Research, U. S. Department of the Navy.) Reproduction in whole or in part is permitted for any purpose of the United States Government. SOME RECENT PHYSICAL CHANGES OF THE OREGON COAST by Samuel N. Dicken assisted by Carl L. Johannessen and Bill Hanneson Department of Geography University of Oregon Eugene, Oregon November 15, 1961 Reprinted in the public interest by the EugeneRegister-Guard and the Lane County Geographical Society,Inc., April, 1976. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The subject of coastal changes is of interest to many people living on or near the Oregon coast and, as a result, numerous interviews, only a few of which can be acknowledged, furnished much information not otherwise available. Valuable assistance came from persons concerned professionally with some aspect of coastal change. The staff of the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Portland District, was most helpful, especially H. A. Kidby of the Rivers and Harbors Section, Lloyd Ruff of the Geology Section, Mr. Charles Oros of the Photogrammetry Office and Dorothy McKean, Librarian. Mr. E. Olson of the U. S. Coast and Geodetic Survey located copies of old charts and other materials.Ralph Mason of the Oregon State Department of Geology and Mineral Industriescon- tributed notes on Ecola Park and other areas. Robert L. Brown and the staff of the U. S. Soil Conservation Service furnished photographs andspec- ific information on vegetation changes of the dunes.Park Snavely of the U.
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon Coast Trail, South Central Coast
    www.visittheoregoncoast.com NOTE: Content specified is from time of PDF creation. Please check website for up-to-date information or for changes. Maps are illustrative in nature and should be used for reference only. LAST UPDATED: 16.07.2018 MAPS DEVELOPED BY: 0 5.0 mi. 10.0 mi. Oregon Coast Trail, South Central Coast NORTH SEE ADJOINING MAP Eel Lake Trail “OCT, CENTRAL COAST” TO FLORENCE Trail (bushwacking) Lakeside Primary Hwy Spinreel OHV Campground State Airport Tenmile Creek Tenmile Lake Secondary Hwy/Rd Riley Ranch 101 Forest Rd (major) Campground Forest Rd (minor) Beach open to OHV travel from Tenmile Creek Tenmile Lake County to Horsfall Beach from October 1 – April 30 Campground Featured Route OREGON DUNES NATIONAL Beale Lake Optional Side Trip SEGMENT 24 RECREATION AREA SEE DETAIL MAP: Bluebill Campground ENLARGE BEALE LAKE TO COOS BAY Horsfall Beach Horsfall OHV Trailhead Campground Horsfall Beach Campground Parking Wild Mare NORTH BEND SEGMENT 25 Horse Camp Sawmill + Tribal SEE DETAIL MAP: Bastendorff Beach + Campground Urban Trail Restrooms COOS BAY TO PIGEON POINT Coos Bay COOS BAY Vault Toilet SUNSET BAY STATE PARK Pigeon Pt Picnic Area SHORE ACRES STATE PARK ENLARGE Picnic Shelter SEGMENT 26 Cape Arago Sunset Bay SP Campground ENLARGE Winchester Creek SEE DETAIL MAP: CAPE ARAGO STATE PARK Historic Landmark PIGEON POINT TO TWOMILE CREEK Seven DevilsRd Vista / Viewpoint Sacchi Beach Marina Agate Beach North Fork PACIFIC OCEAN Bullards Beach 42 Coquille River Merchants Beach Campground Boat Ramp SEGMENT 27 Whiskey Run Beach
    [Show full text]
  • Bandon-Rogue Transmission Line Rebuild Project
    BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION Bandon-Rogue Transmission Line Rebuild Project Final Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact May 2011 DOE/EA-1739 This page left intentionally blank. Bonneville Power Administration Bandon-Rogue Transmission Line Rebuild Project Finding of No Significant Impact May 2011 This page left intentionally blank. Bandon-Rogue Transmission Line Rebuild Project DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Bonneville Power Administration Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) and Floodplain Statement of Findings DOE EA-1739 Summary: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) announces its environmental findings on the Bandon-Rogue Transmission Line Rebuild Project (Rebuild Project or Proposed Action). The Rebuild Project involves rebuilding the existing Bandon-Rogue 115-kilovolt (kV) transmission line. The 46-mile-long transmission line is located in Coos and Curry counties in Oregon, extending from the city of Bandon to near Nesika Beach. BPA has prepared an environmental assessment (EA) evaluating the Proposed Action and a No Action Alternative. Based on the analysis in the EA, BPA has determined that the Proposed Action is not a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment, within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969. Therefore, preparation of an environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required and BPA is issuing this FONSI for the Proposed Action. The Proposed Action is not the type of action that normally requires preparation of an EIS, and the nature of the Proposed Action is not without precedent. BPA has prepared a Mitigation Action Plan (MAP) that lists all of the mitigation measures that BPA is committed to implementing.
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated Check List of the Land Mammals of Curry County, Oregon
    Central Washington University ScholarWorks@CWU All Master's Theses Master's Theses Spring 1970 An Annotated Check List of the Land Mammals of Curry County, Oregon Paul Emerson Sherrell Central Washington University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.cwu.edu/etd Part of the Population Biology Commons Recommended Citation Sherrell, Paul Emerson, "An Annotated Check List of the Land Mammals of Curry County, Oregon" (1970). All Master's Theses. 1530. https://digitalcommons.cwu.edu/etd/1530 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Master's Theses at ScholarWorks@CWU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@CWU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AN AN1'WTATED CHECK LIST OF THE LAND !-ID1MALS OF CURRY COUNTY, OREGON A Thesis Presented to the Graduate Faculty Central Washington State College In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science by Paul E. Sherrel.l :rc:arch, 1970 l .I"' r:: (, I I .,,.:.) , / I Sf'[CIAL COLIJ.C1l01\ APPROVED FOR THE GRADUATE FACULTY ________________________________ Philip C. Dumas, COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN _________________________________ Jared Verner _________________________________ Ronald J. Boles ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to thank Chris Maser, University of Puget. Sound, for his help in identifying specimens, critically reading the rough drafts of this paper, and for his per­ sistence in providing time deadlines. Thanks are also extended to Clayton Fraser, Eugene, Oregon, for his suggestions in regard to the original rough drafts of this paper. The following persons were very helpful in pro­ viding information: Curry County Residents: Frank Colvin, G.
    [Show full text]
  • Tsunami Inundation Map for Humbug Mountain, Curry
    STATE OF OREGON Tsunami Inundation Map Curr-05 DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY AND MINERAL INDUSTRIES Tsunami Inundation Maps for Humbug Mountain, www.OregonGeology.org Distant Source (Alaska-Aleutian Subduction Zone) Tsunami Inundation Map Curry County, Oregon Larry Givens, Governing Board Chair Vicki S. McConnell, Director and State Geologist Plate 2 Andree V. Pollock, Assistant Director Geologic Survey and Services Rachel R. Lyles Smith, Project Operations Manager Humbug Mountain, Oregon Ian P. Madin, Chief Scientist 2012 124°28'0"W 124°26'0"W 124°24'0"W Introduction Map Explanation The Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries (DOGAMI) This tsunami inundation map displays the output of computer models 1 0 2 0 has been identifying and mapping the tsunami inundation hazard representing the two selected tsunami scenarios: Alaska M9.2 (1964) 0 0 along the Oregon coast since 1994. In Oregon, DOGAMI manages the and the Alaska Maximum. All tsunami simulations were run assuming National Tsunami Hazard Mitigation Program, which has been that prevailing tide was static (no flow) and equal to Mean Higher High administered by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Water (MHHW) tide; MHHW is defined as the average height of the Administration (NOAA) since 1995. DOGAMI’s work is designed to higher high tides observed over an 18-year period at the Port Orford help cities, counties, and other sites in coastal areas reduce the tide gauge. The map legend depicts the respective amounts of potential for disastrous tsunami-related consequences by deformation and the earthquake magnitude for these two scenarios. Humbug understanding and mitigating this geologic hazard.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of Oregon Orr Orr.Pdf
    Fifth Edition Geology of Oregon Elizabeth L. Orr William N. Orr University of Oregon Cover: Ripple-marked sand dunes on the Oregon Coast resemble a gigantic fingerprint (photo by Gary Tepfer). Copyright ® 1964 by Ewart M. Baldwin Copyright ® 1976, 1981, 1992, 2000 by Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company ISBN 0-7872-6608-6 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the copyright owner. Printed in the United States of America 10 98765432 Table of Contents Introduction 1 History of geologic study in Oregon 9 Blue Mountains 21 Klamath Mountains 51 Basin and Range 79 High Lava Plains 103 Deschutes-Columbia Plateau 121 Cascade Mountains 141 Coast Range 167 Willamette Valley 203 Bibliography 223 Glossary 245 Index 251 iii Dedicated to the graduates Acknowledgments Between the fourth and fifth editions of Geology of Oregon, the importance of global tectonics to the state has been ingrained even deeper. Riding on the leading edge of the moving North American plate, Oregon reflects the underlying mecha- nism of the plate collision boundary in virtually all aspects of its geology. In the seven years since the fourth edition was written, an irregular but continuing drumbeat of earthquakes reminds us of the forces beneath our feet and the need to prepare for catastrophic changes be they quakes, volcanoes, tsunamis, floods, or massive earth movements. Most profound is the discovery of irrefutable evidence that these catastrophes have been visited on the state quite regularly over the past few thousands of years as well as the absolute surety that similar disasters will oc- cur in the near and distant future.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphy of the Cretaceous Hornbrook Formation, Southern Oregon and Northern California
    Stratigraphy of the Cretaceous Hornbrook Formation, Southern Oregon and Northern California U.S. GEOLOaieAk SURVEY PROFESSI0 JJAl FAFER Stratigraphy of the Cretaceous Hornbrook Formation, Southern Oregon and Northern California By TOR H. NILSEN U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1521 A stratigraphic division of the Hornbrook Formation into five nonmarine and marine members UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1993 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DALLAS L. PECK, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government Illustrations edited by Dale Russell and prepared by Michelle Coveau Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Nilsen, Tor Helge. Stratigraphy of the Cretaceous Hornbrook Formation, southern Oregon and northern California / by Tor H. Nilsen. p. cm. (U.S. Geological Survey professional paper ; 1521) Includes bibliographical references. Supt. of Docs, no.: I 19.16:1521 1. Geology, Stratigraphic Cretaceous. 2. Geology California. 3. Geology Oregon. 4. Hornbrook Formation (Calif, and Or.) I. Title. II. Series. QE685.N55 1993 551.7'7'097952 dc20 , 93-3585 CIP For sale by Book and Open-File Report Sales, U.S. Geological Survey, Federal Center, Box 25286, Denver, CO 80225 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract________________________________ __ 1 Stratigraphic subdivisions of the Hornbrook Formation Introduction 1 Continued Previous work 5 Rocky Gulch Sandstone
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Multi-Species Conservation and Management Plan ODFW
    Coastal Multi-Species Conservation and Management Plan OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE Approved by the Oregon Fish and Wildlife Commission: June 6, 2014 ODFW Mission To protect and enhance Oregon's fish and wildlife and their habitats for use and enjoyment by present and future generations Coastal Multi-Species Conservation and Management Plan June 2014 Acknowledgements Authors (alphabetical) • Jamie Anthony (ODFW) • Kevin Goodson (ODFW) • Jay Nicholas (Contractor) • Matt Falcy (ODFW) • Steve Jacobs (ODFW, retired) • Jim Owens (Cogan Owens Cogan) • Erin Gilbert (ODFW) • Dave Jepsen (ODFW) • Tom Stahl (ODFW) Contributors: Reviews, Data, and Other Assistance (alphabetical) Cogan Owens Cogan, LLC CMP STAKEHOLDER TEAMS – Alisha Morton North Coast Stratum Team – Jim Owens Mid-South Coast Stratum Team – Garry Bullard (City of Manzanita) – Bruce Bertrand (alt., South Coast Anglers) Independent Multidisciplinary – Kelly Dirksen (Conf. Tribes of Grand Ronde) – Scott Cook, Oregon Alliance for Sustainable Science Team – Ian Fergusson (ANWS) Salmon Fisheries – Robert Hughes – Melyssa Graeper (Necanicum Watershed – Nancy Molina (co-chair) – Eric Farm (alt., The Campbell Group) Council) – Carl Schreck (co-chair) – Joe Furia (The Freshwater Trust) – Mike Herbel (CCA) – J. Alan Yeakley – Tom Hoesly (The Campbell Group) – Gary Kish (NSIA) – Aaron Longton (POORT) ODFW – Mark Labhart (Tillamook County) – Lindsay Adrean – Scott McKenzie (resource producer) – Sara LaBorde (Wild Salmon Center) – Kara Anlauf-Dunn – Jim Pex (Coos County) – Ray Monroe
    [Show full text]