DOCSLIB.ORG

Coastal Multi-Species Conservation and Management Plan ODFW

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Coastal Multi-Species Conservation and Management Plan ODFW Coastal Multi-Species Conservation and Management Plan OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE Approved by the Oregon Fish and Wildlife Commission: June 6, 2014 ODFW Mission To protect and enhance Oregon's fish and wildlife and their habitats for use and enjoyment by present and future generations Coastal Multi-Species Conservation and Management Plan June 2014 Acknowledgements Authors (alphabetical) • Jamie Anthony (ODFW) • Kevin Goodson (ODFW) • Jay Nicholas (Contractor) • Matt Falcy (ODFW) • Steve Jacobs (ODFW, retired) • Jim Owens (Cogan Owens Cogan) • Erin Gilbert (ODFW) • Dave Jepsen (ODFW) • Tom Stahl (ODFW) Contributors: Reviews, Data, and Other Assistance (alphabetical) Cogan Owens Cogan, LLC CMP STAKEHOLDER TEAMS – Alisha Morton North Coast Stratum Team – Jim Owens Mid-South Coast Stratum Team – Garry Bullard (City of Manzanita) – Bruce Bertrand (alt., South Coast Anglers) Independent Multidisciplinary – Kelly Dirksen (Conf. Tribes of Grand Ronde) – Scott Cook, Oregon Alliance for Sustainable Science Team – Ian Fergusson (ANWS) Salmon Fisheries – Robert Hughes – Melyssa Graeper (Necanicum Watershed – Nancy Molina (co-chair) – Eric Farm (alt., The Campbell Group) Council) – Carl Schreck (co-chair) – Joe Furia (The Freshwater Trust) – Mike Herbel (CCA) – J. Alan Yeakley – Tom Hoesly (The Campbell Group) – Gary Kish (NSIA) – Aaron Longton (POORT) ODFW – Mark Labhart (Tillamook County) – Lindsay Adrean – Scott McKenzie (resource producer) – Sara LaBorde (Wild Salmon Center) – Kara Anlauf-Dunn – Jim Pex (Coos County) – Ray Monroe (commercial fishing) – Dan Avery – Kelly Robbins (alt., Coquille Indian Tribe) – Allan Moore (Trout Unlimited) – Shari Beals – Jason Robison (Coquille Indian Tribe) – Shawn Reiersgaard (Tillamook Creamery) – Ed Bowles – Larry Robison (Coos County Parks) – Robert Bradley – Jack Smith (fishing guide) – John Schaefer (Confederated Tribes of Coos, – Eric Brown Lower Umpqua, and Siuslaw Indians) – Bob Buckman (retired) Mid-Coast Stratum Team – Kelly Sparks (Curry Watersheds Partnership) – Guy Chilton – Corby Chappell (fish conservation) – Scott Starkey (alt., The Campbell Group) – Chris Claire – Ron Gerber (public-at-large) – Ben Clemens – Dick Stroud (South Coast Anglers) – Wayne Hoffman (Mid Coast Watershed Council) – Ethan Clemons – Mary Wahl (Kalmiopsis Audubon Society) – Brian Hudson (Florence STEP/STAC) – Todd Confer – Don Larsen (alt., Siletz Watershed Council) – Charlie Corrarino (retired) – Tim Dalton – Mike Laverty (NSIA) – Mark Engelking – Joe Rohleder (public-at-large) – Debbi Farrell – John Sanchez (Central Coast Fly Fishers) ACRONYMS and ABBREVIATIONS – Julie Firman – Grant Scheele (fishing guide) • ANWS – Assoc. of Northwest Steelheaders – Craig Foster – Bob Spellbrink (commercial fishing) – Mike Gray • alt. – alternate – Stan Steele (Alsea Sportsman’s Assoc.) – Rick Hargrave • Assoc. – Association – Stan van de Wetering (Conf. Tribes of Siletz – Dave Harris • Conf. – Confederated Indians) – Kevin Herkamp • CCA – Coastal Conservation Assoc. – Greg Huchko • CMP – Coastal Multi-Species Conservation and – Holly Huchko Umpqua Stratum Team Management Plan – Laura Jackson – Walt Barton (Douglas SWCD) • GRWB – Gardiner, Reedsport, and Winchester – Chris Kern – Mike Brochu (alt., Umpqua Fishermen's Assoc.) Bay – Rick Klumph – Kelly Coates (Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe – Chris Knutsen • NFS – Native Fish Society of Indians) – Mark Lewis • NSIA – Northwest Sportfishing Industry – Jeff Dose (alt., Steamboaters) – Steve Mazur Association – Joe Ferguson (Steamboaters) – Bruce McIntosh • ODFW – Oregon Department of Fish and – Steve Godin (GRWB STEP) – Amanda McKenzie Wildlife – Shelly Miller – Greg Haller (Pacific Rivers Council) • POORT – Port Orford Ocean Resources Team – Sam Moyers – Paul Heberling (Umpqua Fishermen's Assoc.) • STEP – Salmon and Trout Enhancement – Kathy Munsel – Cameron Krauss (Douglas Timber Operators) Program – Scott Patterson – Dave Loomis (alt., Douglas County) – Brian Riggers • STAC – Salmon and Trout Advisory Committee – Susan Morgan (Douglas County Commissioner) – Tom Rumreich • SWCD – Soil and Water Conservation District – Eric Riley (Partnership for Umpqua Rivers) – Jessica Sall – John Spangler – Wayne Spicer (Umpqua Valley Fly Fishers) – Erik Suring – Peter Tronquet (alt., Steamboaters, NFS) – Bob Swingle – Gary Vonderohe – Tim Walters – Derek Wilson 2 – Acknowledgements Coastal Multi-Species Conservation and Management Plan June 2014 Acronyms and Abbreviations A&P ......... Abundance and Productivity N/A .......... Not applicable AABM ...... Aggregate Abundance-Based Management NADOT ..... Non-Assessed Direct Ocean Tributary AAS .......... Adult-to-Adult Survival Neq .......... Number of spawners at equilibrium; an estimate of carrying capacity A-13 ......... Amendment 13 to the PFMC Salmon Fishery Management Plan NFCP ........ Native Fish Conservation Policy AK ............ Alaska NMFS ....... National Marine Fisheries Service A&P .......... Abundance and productivity NOAA ....... National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration-Fisheries Service AIC ........... Akaike Information Criterion OAR ......... Oregon Administrative Rule ANCOVA .. Analysis of Covariance OASIS ....... Oregon Adult Salmonid Inventory and Sampling Project AOS .......... Adult-to-Outmigrant Survival OCCCP ...... Oregon Coast Coho Conservation Plan AQI ........... Aquatic Inventories Project ODFW ...... Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife AUC .......... Area Under the Curve OFWC ....... Oregon Fish and Wildlife Commission AvPP ........ Avian Predation Project OHRC ....... Oregon Hatchery Research Center BC ............. British Columbia ONFSR ...... 2005 Oregon Native Fish Status Report CCRMP ..... Coastal Chinook Research and Monitoring Project OSCRP ...... Ocean Salmon and Columbia River Program CCT ........... Coastal Cutthroat Trout OSMB ....... Oregon State Marine Board CEF ........... Cohort Expansion Factor OSU .......... Oregon State University cfs ............ Cubic feet per second OWEB ...... Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board ChF ........... Fall-run Chinook OWRD ...... Oregon Water Resources Department ChS ........... Spring Chinook P ............... Productivity CLAMS ..... Coastal Landscape Analysis and Modeling Study PCM ......... Peak Count Model CMP ......... Coastal Multi-Species Conservation and Management Plan PFMC ....... Pacific Fishery Management Council CO ............ Coho pHOS ........ Percent of hatchery fish on spawning grounds COC .......... Cogan Owens Cogan, LLC Prop ........ Propagation Program COHSHAK Cohort Analysis with Shakers PSC ........... Pacific Salmon Commission CWT ......... Coded-wire tag PST ........... Pacific Salmon Treaty D .............. Diversity PVA .......... Population Viability Analysis DCCO ........ Double-crested Cormorant QET .......... Quasi-Extinction Threshold DEM ......... Digital Elevation Model RecFish .... Recreational Fisheries Program DEQ .......... Oregon Department of Environmental Quality RFT ........... Reproductive Failure Threshold DIC ........... Deviance Information Criterion RME ......... Research, Monitoring, and Evaluation DIDSON .... Dual-Frequency Identification Sonar SAH .......... Salmonid Anchor Habitat EIS ............ Escapement Indicator Stock SAR .......... Smolt-to-Adult Survival EPA........... Environmental Protection Agency Scales ....... Fish Life History/Scale Analysis Project ER ............. Extinction risk SE ............. Standard Error ERIS .......... Exploitation Rate Indicator Stock SEV ........... Salmonid Ecosystem Value ESA ........... Endangered Species Act SLAM ....... Species Life-cycle Analysis Modules ESU........... Evolutionarily Significant Unit SMB ......... Smallmouth bass FHMP ....... Fish Hatchery Management Policy SMSY........ Spawner abundance at Maximum Sustainable Yield GIS ........... Geographic Information System SMU ......... Species Management Unit GLMM ...... Generalized Linear Mixed Effects Model SS ............. Spatial Structure GRTS ........ Generalized Randomized-Tessellation Stratified technique STEP ......... Salmon and Trout Enhancement Program HB ............ House Bill (Oregon Legislature) StW .......... Winter Steelhead HSRG ........ Hatchery Scientific Review Group StS ............ Summer Steelhead HU ............ Hydrologic Unit SWCD ....... Soil and Water Conservation District HUC .......... Hydrologic Unit Coding TAM ......... Total Accessible Miles ICTRT ........ Interior Columbia Technical Recovery Team TBD .......... to be determined IMST ......... Independent Multidisciplinary Science Team TMDL ....... Total Maximum Daily Load IP .............. Intrinsic Potential USFS ......... U.S.D.A. Forest Service LCM .......... Life-Cycle Monitoring Project USFWS ..... U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service LCMS ........ Life-Cycle Monitoring Site USGS ........ United States Geological Service LIDAR ....... Laser Imaging, Detection and Ranging VSP .......... Viable salmonid population MAF ......... Mean Annual Flow WinBUGS . Bayesian statistical software McMC ...... Markov chain Monte Carlo method WLC-TRT .. Willamette/Lower Columbia Technical Recovery Team MET .......... Minimum equilibrium threshold WORP ...... Western Oregon Rearing Project MMP ........ Marine Mammal Program yr ............. year MR ........... Mark-Recapture yrs ............ years MRP ......... Marine Resources Program MSY .......... Maximum Sustained Yield 3 – Acronyms and Abbreviations Coastal Multi-Species Conservation and Management Plan June 2014 Coastal Multi-Species Conservation and Management
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ocean Shore Management Plan
    Ocean Shore Management Plan Oregon Parks and Recreation Department January 2005 Ocean Shore Management Plan Oregon Parks and Recreation Department January 2005 Oregon Parks and Recreation Department Planning Section 725 Summer Street NE Suite C Salem Oregon 97301 Kathy Schutt: Project Manager Contributions by OPRD staff: Michelle Michaud Terry Bergerson Nancy Niedernhofer Jean Thompson Robert Smith Steve Williams Tammy Baumann Coastal Area and Park Managers Table of Contents Planning for Oregon’s Ocean Shore: Executive Summary .......................................................................... 1 Chapter One Introduction.................................................................................................................. 9 Chapter Two Ocean Shore Management Goals.............................................................................19 Chapter Three Balancing the Demands: Natural Resource Management .......................................23 Chapter Four Balancing the Demands: Cultural/Historic Resource Management .........................29 Chapter Five Balancing the Demands: Scenic Resource Management.........................................33 Chapter Six Balancing the Demands: Recreational Use and Management .................................39 Chapter Seven Beach Access............................................................................................................57 Chapter Eight Beach Safety .............................................................................................................71
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon Coast Trail
    OREGON COAST TRAIL Finalized Design Submittal Boardman Trail Project Logo - Oregon Coast Trail Submitted by Denise Dahn, Dahn Design 2/1/04 Actual size variable OREGON COAST TRAIL OREGON COAST TRAIL OREGON COAST TRAIL OREGON COAST TRAIL TRAIL TRAIL COAST COAST COAST OREGON COAST TRAIL OREGON OREGON TRAIL OREGON OREGON COAST TRAIL OREGON COAST TRAIL The Oregon Coast Trail begins its 382-mile route at the 1 Columbia River south jetty. The trailhead is 4 miles north of 1. Columbia River to Fort Stevens State Park campground. The first 16 miles is on the beach between the south jetty and Gearhart. Finalized Design Submittal Boardman Trail Project Logo - Oregon Coast Trail Submitted by Denise Dahn, Dahn Design 2/1/04 OREGON Actual size variable Oswald West State Park COAST OREGON COAST TRAIL OREGON COAST TRAIL OREGON COAST TRAIL TRAIL OREGON COAST TRAIL L T AIL RAI AS COLUMBIA RIVER T TR T S L E G E N D CO OA C COAST Fort Stevens EGON OREGON COAST TRAIL OR OREGON TRAIL OREGON OREGON State Park COAST TRAIL OREGON COAST Oregon Coast Trail TRAIL OREGON Beach Trail COAST TRAIL ASTORIA OREGON COAST 30 Trail on Road/Hard Surface TRAIL Alternate Route 101 OREGON COAST TRAIL Roads Finalized Design Submittal Boardman Trail Project Logo - Oregon Coast Trail 104 Submitted by Denise Dahn, Dahn Design 2/1/04 Actual size variable WARRENTON 101B 1 Trail Direction Information OREGON COAST TRAIL OREGON COAST TRAIL OREGON COAST TRAIL OREGON State Park Boundary COAST TRAIL TRAIL TRAIL AST COAST COAST CO OREGON COAST TRAIL OREGON OREGON TRAIL OREGON 104 S OREGON COAST TRAIL Interpretive Exhibit Information OREGON COAST TRAIL 101B Camping AIL 0 1.25 2.5 N A TR miles miles -TO-SE RT FO OREGON COAST TRAIL PLEASE NOTE: The trail route may change due to Sunset Beach safety issues, road closures or State Recreation Site OREGON COAST TRAIL detours.
    [Show full text]
  • Timing of In-Water Work to Protect Fish and Wildlife Resources
    OREGON GUIDELINES FOR TIMING OF IN-WATER WORK TO PROTECT FISH AND WILDLIFE RESOURCES June, 2008 Purpose of Guidelines - The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, (ODFW), “The guidelines are to assist under its authority to manage Oregon’s fish and wildlife resources has updated the following guidelines for timing of in-water work. The guidelines are to assist the the public in minimizing public in minimizing potential impacts to important fish, wildlife and habitat potential impacts...”. resources. Developing the Guidelines - The guidelines are based on ODFW district fish “The guidelines are based biologists’ recommendations. Primary considerations were given to important fish species including anadromous and other game fish and threatened, endangered, or on ODFW district fish sensitive species (coded list of species included in the guidelines). Time periods were biologists’ established to avoid the vulnerable life stages of these fish including migration, recommendations”. spawning and rearing. The preferred work period applies to the listed streams, unlisted upstream tributaries, and associated reservoirs and lakes. Using the Guidelines - These guidelines provide the public a way of planning in-water “These guidelines provide work during periods of time that would have the least impact on important fish, wildlife, and habitat resources. ODFW will use the guidelines as a basis for the public a way of planning commenting on planning and regulatory processes. There are some circumstances where in-water work during it may be appropriate to perform in-water work outside of the preferred work period periods of time that would indicated in the guidelines. ODFW, on a project by project basis, may consider variations in climate, location, and category of work that would allow more specific have the least impact on in-water work timing recommendations.
    [Show full text]
  • Relations Between Geology and Mass Movement Features in a Part of the East Fork Coquille River Watershed, Southern Coast Range, Oregon
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Jeffrey W. Lane for the degree of Master of Science in Geology presented on May 19, 1987 Title: Relations Between Geology and Mass Movement Features in a Part of the East Fork Coquille River Watershed, Southern Coast Range, Oregon Signature redacted for privacy. Abstract Approved: Frederick J. Swanson ABSTRACT Various types of mass movement features are found in the drainage basin of the East Fork Coquille River in the southern Oregon Coast Range. The distribution and forms of mass movement features in the area are related to geologic factors and the resultant topography. The Jurassic Otter Point Formation, a melange of low-grade metamor- phic and marine sedimentary rocks, is present in scattered outcrops in the southwest portion of the study area but is not extensive. The Tertiary Roseburg Formation consists primarily of bedded siltstone and is compressed into a series of west to northwest-striking folds. The overlying Lookingglass, Flournoy, and Tyee Formations consist of rhyth- mically bedded sandstone and siltstone units with an east to northeast- erly dip of 5-15°decreasing upward in the stratigraphic section. The units form cuesta ridges with up to 2000 feet of relief. The distribution of mass movements is demonstrably related to the bedrock geology and the study area topography. Debris avalanches are more common on the steep slopes underlain by Flournoy Formation and Tyee Formation sandstones, on the obsequent slope of cuesta ridges, and on north-facing slopes. Soil creep occurs throughout the study area and may be the pri- mary mass movement form in siltstone terrane, though soil creep was not studied in detail.
    [Show full text]
  • Management Implications of Co-Occurring Native and Introduced Fishes
    Management Implications of Co-occurring Native and Introduced Fishes Proceedings of the Workshop October 27-28, 1998 Portland, Oregon Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife National Marine Fisheries Service April 1999 Recommended Citation: Entire Proceedings ODFW and NMFS. 1999. Management Implications of Co-occurring Native and Introduced Fishes: Proceedings of the Workshop. October 27-28, 1998, Portland, Oregon. 243 pgs. Available from: National Marine Fisheries Service, 525 N.E. Oregon St., Suite 510, Portland, OR 97232. Specific Paper Karchesky, C.M and D. H. Bennett. 1999. Dietary overlap between introduced fishes and juvenile salmonids in Lower Granite Reservoir, Idaho-Washington. In ODFW and NMFS. 1999. Management Implications of Co-occurring Native and Introduced Fishes: Proceedings of the Workshop. October 27-28, 1998, Portland, Oregon. 243 pgs. Available from: National Marine Fisheries Service, 525 N.E. Oregon St., Suite 510, Portland, OR 97232. Management Implications of Co-occurring Native and Introduced Fishes Proceedings of the Workshop October 27-28, 1998 Portland, Oregon Hosted by: Fish Division Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife & Sustainable Fisheries Division National Marine Fisheries Service April 1999 These Proceedings contain unedited, non-peer reviewed papers (unless otherwise specified) of oral presentations given at the workshop “Management Implications of Co- occurring Native and Introduced Fishes” held in Portland, Oregon, on October 27-28, 1998. Although care was taken to present the information in an accurate, standardized manner, errors may exist. Please contact the authors before interpreting or quoting any information presented. Reference in this document to trade names does not imply endorsement by the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife or the National Marine Fisheries Service.
    [Show full text]
  • A Classification of Lakes in the Coast Range Ecoregion with Respect to Nutrient Processing EPA 910-R-05-002 December 2005
    EPA 910-R-05-002 Alaska United States Region 10 Idaho Environmental Protection 1200 Sixth Avenue Oregon Agency Seattle WA 98101 Washington Office of Water & Watersheds December 2005 A Classification of Lakes in the Coast Range Ecoregion with Respect to Nutrient Processing EPA 910-R-05-002 December 2005 A CLASSIFICATION OF LAKES IN THE COAST RANGE ECOREGION WITH RESPECT TO NUTRIENT PROCESSING R.M. Vaga, US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water and Watersheds, Region 10, 1200 Sixth Ave. Seattle, WA 98101 R.R. Petersen, M.M. Sytsma and M. Rosenkrantz, Environmental Sciences and Resources, Portland State University, Portland Oregon, 97202 A.T. Herlihy, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University, 104 Nash Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331 DISCLAIMER The information in this document has been funded wholly or in part by the United States Environmental Protection Agency. It has been subjected to the Agency’s peer and administrative review and it has been approved for publication as an EPA document. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. (Cover photo: An unnamed dune lake on the Southern Oregon coast. Photo by R.M. Vaga) ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT .................................................................................................. iv 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................... 1 2 LAKE INVENTORY ................................................................................... 2
    [Show full text]
  • CHARLES E. HEANEY: MEMORY, IMAGINATION, and PLACE Hallie Ford Museum of Art at Willamette University January 22 Through March 19, 2005
    CHARLES E. HEANEY: MEMORY, IMAGINATION, AND PLACE Hallie Ford Museum of Art at Willamette University January 22 through March 19, 2005 Teachers Guide This guide is to help teachers prepare students for a field trip to the exhibition, Charles Heaney: Memory, Imagination, and Place; offer ways to lead their own tours; and propose ideas to reinforce the gallery experience and broaden curriculum concepts. Teachers, however, will need to consider the level and needs of their students in adapting these materials and lessons. Preparing for the tour: • If possible, visit the exhibition on your own beforehand. • Using the images (print out sets for students, create a bulletin board, etc.) and information in the teacher packet, create a pre-tour lesson plan for the classroom to support and complement the gallery experience. If you are unable to use images in the classroom, the suggested discussions can be used for the Museum tour. • Create a tour Build on the concepts students have discussed in the classroom Have a specific focus, i.e. the theme Memory, Imagination and Place; subject matter; art elements; etc. Be selective – don’t try to look at or talk about everything in the exhibition. Include a simple task to keep students focused. Plan transitions and closure for the tour. • Make sure students are aware of gallery etiquette. At the Museum: • Review with students what is expected – their task and museum behavior. • Focus on the works of art. Emphasize looking and discovery through visual scanning (a guide is included in this packet). If you are unsure where to begin, a good way to start is by asking, “What is happening in this picture?” Follow with questions that will help students back up their observations: “What do you see that makes you say that?” or “Show us what you have found.” • Balance telling about a work and letting students react to a work.
    [Show full text]
  • Growing up Indian: an Emic Perspective
    GROWING UP INDIAN: AN EMIC PERSPECTIVE By GEORGE BUNDY WASSON, JR. A DISSERTATION Presented to the Department of Anthropology and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy june 2001 ii "Growing Up Indian: An Ernie Perspective," a dissertation prepared by George B. Wasson, Jr. in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Anthropology. This dissertation is approved and accepted by: Committee in charge: Dr. jon M. Erlandson, Chair Dr. C. Melvin Aikens Dr. Madonna L. Moss Dr. Rennard Strickland (outside member) Dr. Barre Toelken Accepted by: ------------------------------�------------------ Dean of the Graduate School iii Copyright 2001 George B. Wasson, Jr. iv An Abstract of the Dissertation of George Bundy Wasson, Jr. for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Anthropology to be taken June 2001 Title: GROWING UP INDIAN: AN EMIC PERSPECTN E Approved: My dissertation, GROWING UP INDIAN: AN EMIC PERSPECTN E describes the historical and contemporary experiences of the Coquille Indian Tribe and their close neighbors (as manifested in my own family), in relation to their shared cultures, languages, and spiritual practices. I relate various tribal reactions to the tragedy of cultural genocide as experienced by those indigenous groups within the "Black Hole" of Southwest Oregon. My desire is to provide an "inside" (ernie) perspective on the history and cultural changes of Southwest Oregon. I explain Native responses to living primarily in a non-Indian world, after the nearly total loss of aboriginal Coquelle culture and tribal identity through v decimation by disease, warfare, extermination, and cultural genocide through the educational policies of the Bureau of Indian Affairs, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Hour by Hour!
    Volume 13 Issue 158 HIPFiSHmonthlyHIPFiSHmonthly March 2012 thethe columbiacolumbia pacificpacific region’sregion’s freefree alternativealternative ERIN HOFSETH A new form of Feminism PG. 4 pg. 8 on A NATURALIZEDWOMAN by William Ham InvestLOWER Your hourTime!COLUMBIA by hour! TIME BANK A NEW community RESOURCE by Lynn Hadley PG. 14 I’LL TRADE ACCOUNTNG ! ! A TALE OF TWO Watt TRIBALChildress CANOES& David Stowe PG. 12 CSA TIME pg. 10 SECOND SATURDAY ARTWALK OPEN MARCH 10. COME IN 10–7 DAILY Showcasing one-of-a-kind vintage finn kimonos. Drop in for styling tips on ware how to incorporate these wearable works-of-art into your wardrobe. A LADIES’ Come See CLOTHING BOUTIQUE What’s Fresh For Spring! In Historic Downtown Astoria @ 1144 COMMERCIAL ST. 503-325-8200 Open Sundays year around 11-4pm finnware.com • 503.325.5720 1116 Commercial St., Astoria Hrs: M-Th 10-5pm/ F 10-5:30pm/Sat 10-5pm Why Suffer? call us today! [ KAREN KAUFMAN • Auto Accidents L.Ac. • Ph.D. •Musculoskeletal • Work Related Injuries pain and strain • Nutritional Evaluations “Stockings and Stripes” by Annette Palmer •Headaches/Allergies • Second Opinions 503.298.8815 •Gynecological Issues [email protected] NUDES DOWNTOWN covered by most insurance • Stress/emotional Issues through April 4 ASTORIA CHIROPRACTIC Original Art • Fine Craft Now Offering Acupuncture Laser Therapy! Dr. Ann Goldeen, D.C. Exceptional Jewelry 503-325-3311 &Traditional OPEN DAILY 2935 Marine Drive • Astoria 1160 Commercial Street Astoria, Oregon Chinese Medicine 503.325.1270 riverseagalleryastoria.com
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon's Percent for Art Program
    connections | percent for art | september Oregon’s Percent for Art Program: A Public Legacy Contents Oregon’s Commitment to Art in Public Spaces 2 Process and Impact of the State Art Collection 3 Art Melds with Engineering at Portland State University 4 2 0 0 6 A Timeless Mosaic at SOU’s Hannon Library 5 A Landmark Sculpture for the State of Oregon 6 Developing Public Art in Oregon’s Smaller Communities 7 Artist Profile: Henk Pander 8 photo: bruce forster Introduction Oregon Realizes its Commitment to Art in Public Spaces Living up to its pioneering reputation, Oregon was one of the first states in the nation to pass “I can never assume that I am in the studio Percent for Art legislation. Enacted in 1975, the state statute guides the acquisition of Oregon’s State Art alone. For I am in a partnership as I work. I am Collection, which includes more than 2,500 original art a partner with the site and the community. I am works. From Astoria to Agness, Baker City to Milton- Freewater, Bend to Klamath Falls, state buildings a partner with the city and its bureaus, with its and public spaces host permanent reminders of the citizens and with the future of place. And my breadth, variety and aesthetics of our history, environ- ment, people, and changing concerns. goal in these partnerships is to create a work How the Percent for Art Program Developed which will provide a personal experience within the public setting, and keep on ticking.” The Percent for Art statute (ors 276.075) sets aside “not less than 1% of the direct construction funds of – Tad Savinar new or remodeled state buildings with construction Artist, Portland budgets of $100,000 or greater for the acquisition of art work which may be an integral part of the building, attached thereto, or capable of display in other State Buildings.” • A commitment to helping artists attain public Since its inception, the Percent for Art program has recognition and visibility through Percent for Art maintained: opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Urban Cultural Policy Global
    THE POLITICS OF URBAN CULTURAL POLICY GLOBAL PERSPECTIVES Carl Grodach and Daniel Silver 2012 CONTENTS List of Figures and Tables iv Contributors v Acknowledgements viii INTRODUCTION Urbanizing Cultural Policy 1 Carl Grodach and Daniel Silver Part I URBAN CULTURAL POLICY AS AN OBJECT OF GOVERNANCE 20 1. A Different Class: Politics and Culture in London 21 Kate Oakley 2. Chicago from the Political Machine to the Entertainment Machine 42 Terry Nichols Clark and Daniel Silver 3. Brecht in Bogotá: How Cultural Policy Transformed a Clientist Political Culture 66 Eleonora Pasotti 4. Notes of Discord: Urban Cultural Policy in the Confrontational City 86 Arie Romein and Jan Jacob Trip 5. Cultural Policy and the State of Urban Development in the Capital of South Korea 111 Jong Youl Lee and Chad Anderson Part II REWRITING THE CREATIVE CITY SCRIPT 130 6. Creativity and Urban Regeneration: The Role of La Tohu and the Cirque du Soleil in the Saint-Michel Neighborhood in Montreal 131 Deborah Leslie and Norma Rantisi 7. City Image and the Politics of Music Policy in the “Live Music Capital of the World” 156 Carl Grodach ii 8. “To Have and to Need”: Reorganizing Cultural Policy as Panacea for 176 Berlin’s Urban and Economic Woes Doreen Jakob 9. Urban Cultural Policy, City Size, and Proximity 195 Chris Gibson and Gordon Waitt Part III THE IMPLICATIONS OF URBAN CULTURAL POLICY AGENDAS FOR CREATIVE PRODUCTION 221 10. The New Cultural Economy and its Discontents: Governance Innovation and Policy Disjuncture in Vancouver 222 Tom Hutton and Catherine Murray 11. Creating Urban Spaces for Culture, Heritage, and the Arts in Singapore: Balancing Policy-Led Development and Organic Growth 245 Lily Kong 12.
    [Show full text]
  • DOGAMI Open-File Report O-16-02, Landslide Susceptibility Overview
    State of Oregon Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries Brad Avy, State Geologist OPEN-FILE REPORT O-16-02 LANDSLIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY OVERVIEW MAP OF OREGON By William J. Burns1, Katherine A. Mickelson1, and Ian P. Madin1 G E O L O G Y F A N O D T N M I E N M E T R R A A L P I E N D D U N S O T G R E I R E S O 1937 2016 1Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries, 800 NE Oregon Street, Suite 965, Portland, Oregon 97232 Landslide Susceptibility Overview Map of Oregon NOTICE This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. Users of this information should review or consult the primary data and information sources to ascertain the usability of the information. This publication cannot substitute for site-specific investigations by qualified practitioners. Site-specific data may give results that differ from the results shown in the publication. Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries Open-File Report O-16-02 Published in conformance with ORS 516.030 For additional information: Administrative Offices 800 NE Oregon Street, Suite 965 Portland, OR 97232 Telephone (971) 673-1555 Fax (971) 673-1562 http://www.oregongeology.org http://www.oregon.gov/DOGAMI/ ii Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries Open-File Report O-16-02 Landslide Susceptibility Overview Map of Oregon TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 REPORT SUMMARY ..............................................................................................1 2.0 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]