Management Implications of Co-Occurring Native and Introduced Fishes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Management Implications of Co-Occurring Native and Introduced Fishes Management Implications of Co-occurring Native and Introduced Fishes Proceedings of the Workshop October 27-28, 1998 Portland, Oregon Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife National Marine Fisheries Service April 1999 Recommended Citation: Entire Proceedings ODFW and NMFS. 1999. Management Implications of Co-occurring Native and Introduced Fishes: Proceedings of the Workshop. October 27-28, 1998, Portland, Oregon. 243 pgs. Available from: National Marine Fisheries Service, 525 N.E. Oregon St., Suite 510, Portland, OR 97232. Specific Paper Karchesky, C.M and D. H. Bennett. 1999. Dietary overlap between introduced fishes and juvenile salmonids in Lower Granite Reservoir, Idaho-Washington. In ODFW and NMFS. 1999. Management Implications of Co-occurring Native and Introduced Fishes: Proceedings of the Workshop. October 27-28, 1998, Portland, Oregon. 243 pgs. Available from: National Marine Fisheries Service, 525 N.E. Oregon St., Suite 510, Portland, OR 97232. Management Implications of Co-occurring Native and Introduced Fishes Proceedings of the Workshop October 27-28, 1998 Portland, Oregon Hosted by: Fish Division Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife & Sustainable Fisheries Division National Marine Fisheries Service April 1999 These Proceedings contain unedited, non-peer reviewed papers (unless otherwise specified) of oral presentations given at the workshop “Management Implications of Co- occurring Native and Introduced Fishes” held in Portland, Oregon, on October 27-28, 1998. Although care was taken to present the information in an accurate, standardized manner, errors may exist. Please contact the authors before interpreting or quoting any information presented. Reference in this document to trade names does not imply endorsement by the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife or the National Marine Fisheries Service. ii Preface On October 27 and 28, 1998, the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife and the National Marine Fisheries Service brought together scientists, fishery managers, fishing and conservation organizations, and other stakeholders for a snapshot of the issues and facts surrounding the management of introduced and native fishes. This volume contains the papers that were presented by those speakers; a record of the presentations for anyone with a stake in these issues no matter their perspectives. This symposium was occasioned by increased concern for native fish species, as evidenced by the numerous listings under the Endangered Species Act in the past several years, and the assumed role of introduced, non-indigenous species in many of those listings. The Oregon Plan for Salmon and Watersheds identifies the need to examine these issues associated with steelhead and coho salmon, and to take management actions where they are warranted. In order to present a region-wide view of both anadromous and resident fish issues, as well as the associated issues of managing important recreational fisheries on introduced fisheries, this symposium was extended to include states well beyond the scope of the Oregon Plan. Speakers from throughout the West presented views and findings. Both the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife and the National Marine Fisheries Service will consider the papers presented here as they develop and implement policy direction for responding to the issues which occasioned this meeting. At issue is recovery of native fish species and the future of many fisheries on introduced species. The issues are complex, and the risks and remedies are often uncertain. We urge that stakeholders review the material presented here and participate in the public hearings of the Oregon Fish and Wildlife Commission and review of NMFS documents on these vital questions. Ray Temple, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Lance Kruzic, National Marine Fisheries Service iii History, Distribution, and Recent Management of Introduced Fishes Session Chair: Herb Pollard National Marine Fisheries Service 1 “The Coming of the Pond Fishes” An Account of the Introduction of Certain Spiny-Rayed Fishes, and Other Exotic Species, into the Waters of the Lower Columbia River Region and the Pacific Coast States Herb Pollard National Marine Fisheries Service, 525 N.E. Oregon St. Suite 500, Portland, Oregon 97232 “The Coming of the Pond Fishes” by Ben Hur Lampman, published in Portland in 1946, summarizes the early history of exotic fish in the northwest. The book is written with the enthusiasm of an avid angler and friend of warm-water fish. It also points out some of the controversy and concern about introducing potential predators and competitors to waters that support native species that existed even in the 1800's. Two of the most important dates in the history of non-native fish to the western U.S. are 1869 and 1884. In 1869, the Union Pacific and Central Pacific railways met at Promontory Point, Utah in the famous “Golden Spike” ceremony. The first non-native fish, shad, arrived by rail and were released in the Sacramento River in 1871, courtesy of Seth Greene, one of the earliest American fish culturists (Table 1). The Oregon Short Line was completed in 1884, connecting the UP mainline at Granger, Wyoming to the Pacific Northwest via the Oregon-Washington Railroad and Navigation Company. By 1887, largemouth bass were established in the Snake River Drainage and other species were on the way. Although most of the new introductions were met with much enthusiasm, there was some opposition. As early as 1893 the Oregonian carried an editorial debate on the merits of bass introductions-at least five years after the introductions had occurred. And some of the introductions by state game wardens and early fishery biologists were clearly done without sanction of their commissions or real consideration of the impacts. Many of the very early introductions were made by private individuals, often with a profit motive. Some of the early enthusiasm for carp reads a lot like the recent publicity for ostrich and emu ranching. The only people to make any money were those that sold the brood stock and soon both the markets and natural waters were flooded. The U. S. Fish Commission was soon involved. Livingston Stone, first deputy to Spencer Baird, the first U.S. Fish Commissioner, developed and freely utilized the “Aquarium Car”. From the 1870's through the 1920's the Fish Commission operated a salvage station on the Illinois River. As spring floods receded, salvage crews seined the oxbow lakes and sloughs for bass, catfish and sunfish. The assorted fish were loaded on the aquarium cars and shipped westward. Some of the fish were delivered to state game wardens for distribution, others were consigned to individuals or sportsman’s club. Others were apparently dipped out and dumped at water stops or released where the train broke down. There must have been some sorting of fish, or the western waters would have received even more species, but the use of salvaged fish probably explains some of the unusual species and distribution that occurs today. Introductions of non-native fishes seems to have gone through three stages. From the 1870s through the 1920s there were numerous introductions without much thought or evaluation of impacts. By the 1920s, most of the species currently managed in the West were well established. From the 20s through the 60s, the state agencies proceeded to transplant from established stocks to suitable waters-- often with the unauthorized assistance of fishermen. There was a more scientific approach, especially as new reservoir habitat was created and managers attempted to match species with habitat. However, bass and panfish remained low priorities for most anglers and most fishery managers. In the 1970s tournament bass fishing and interest in warm-water fishing increased rapidly, leading to more intense management. 3 Table 1. Brief chronology of the coming of the pond fishes. Common Name Earliest introductions to western waters Shad 1871 Sacramento River; Seth Greene and California Fish Commission 1885 Columbia, Snake and Willamette; U.S.Fish Commission (Diverted from Puget Sound, due to blocked railroad) Striped Bass 1879 San Francisco Bay, Livingston Stone and California Fish Comm. (This introduction also included eels and lobsters) Tench 1895 Spokane Co., Washington and Kootenai County, Idaho, USFC Carp 1872 Sonoma County, California, private citizen, from Germany via ship and rail 1880 Troutdale, Oregon, private citizen from California 1882 USFC, California, Washington, Idaho and Oregon Catfish 1874 White catfish, brown bullhead, San Joaquin and Sacramento; USFC 1880 Bullheads, Willamette River, private citizens 1877 Channel catfish, Sacramento, USFC 1893 Channel Catfish, Boise River, USFC (also Willamette, but not reported in Willamette and Lower Columbia until 1940's) 1943 Blue Catfish (probably flatheads) Snake River, USFWS and IDFG (There are several species including black and yellow bullheads, flathead catfish, tadpole madtom and white catfish that were introduced with no clear records, probably in mixed loads of salvaged fish.) Largemouth Bass 1887 Boise River, private citizen 1888 Willamette River, private citizen 1892 USFC Boise, Willamette with mixed sunfish Smallmouth Bass 1874 California, USFC 1920 Blakely Island Washington, Private timber Company 1924 Willamette River, ODFW from Blakely Island 1925 Yakima River, Benton County Game Commissioners Crappie 1892 Boise River, USFC 1893 Willamette River, USFC mixed with other bass and sunfish. 1905 Willamette/Columbia, Releases from Lewis and Clark Centennial
Recommended publications
  • A Classification of Lakes in the Coast Range Ecoregion with Respect to Nutrient Processing EPA 910-R-05-002 December 2005
    EPA 910-R-05-002 Alaska United States Region 10 Idaho Environmental Protection 1200 Sixth Avenue Oregon Agency Seattle WA 98101 Washington Office of Water & Watersheds December 2005 A Classification of Lakes in the Coast Range Ecoregion with Respect to Nutrient Processing EPA 910-R-05-002 December 2005 A CLASSIFICATION OF LAKES IN THE COAST RANGE ECOREGION WITH RESPECT TO NUTRIENT PROCESSING R.M. Vaga, US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water and Watersheds, Region 10, 1200 Sixth Ave. Seattle, WA 98101 R.R. Petersen, M.M. Sytsma and M. Rosenkrantz, Environmental Sciences and Resources, Portland State University, Portland Oregon, 97202 A.T. Herlihy, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University, 104 Nash Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331 DISCLAIMER The information in this document has been funded wholly or in part by the United States Environmental Protection Agency. It has been subjected to the Agency’s peer and administrative review and it has been approved for publication as an EPA document. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. (Cover photo: An unnamed dune lake on the Southern Oregon coast. Photo by R.M. Vaga) ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT .................................................................................................. iv 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................... 1 2 LAKE INVENTORY ................................................................................... 2
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Mineral Resources of Douglas County
    STATE OF OREGON DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY AND MINERAL INDUSTRIES 1069 State Office Building Portland, Oregon 97201 BU LLE TIN 75 GEOLOGY & MINERAL RESOURCES of DOUGLAS COUNTY, OREGON Le n Ra mp Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries The preparation of this report was financially aided by a grant from Doug I as County GOVERNING BOARD R. W. deWeese, Portland, Chairman William E. Miller, Bend Donald G. McGregor, Grants Pass STATE GEOLOGIST R. E. Corcoran FOREWORD Douglas County has a history of mining operations extending back for more than 100 years. During this long time interval there is recorded produc­ tion of gold, silver, copper, lead, zinc, mercury, and nickel, plus lesser amounts of other metalliferous ores. The only nickel mine in the United States, owned by The Hanna Mining Co., is located on Nickel Mountain, approxi­ mately 20 miles south of Roseburg. The mine and smelter have operated con­ tinuously since 1954 and provide year-round employment for more than 500 people. Sand and gravel production keeps pace with the local construction needs. It is estimated that the total value of all raw minerals produced in Douglas County during 1972 will exceed $10, 000, 000 . This bulletin is the first in a series of reports to be published by the Department that will describe the general geology of each county in the State and provide basic information on mineral resources. It is particularly fitting that the first of the series should be Douglas County since it is one of the min­ eral leaders in the state and appears to have considerable potential for new discoveries during the coming years.
    [Show full text]
  • Tenmile Lakes Watershed Assessment Produced by The
    Tenmile Lakes Watershed Assessment Produced by the Tenmile Lakes Basin Partnership Table of Contents Chapter 1 ........................................................................................................................1-1 Introduction................................................................................................................1-1 Chapter 2 ........................................................................................................................2-1 Fish & Fish Habitat ....................................................................................................2-1 Introduction ........................................................................................................2-1 Critical Questions ..............................................................................................2-2 Fish Presence......................................................................................................2-3 Species of Concern............................................................................................2-8 Life History ..........................................................................................................2-9 Hatcheries, Stocking Programs, Illicit Introductions..........................2-9 Conclusions........................................................................................................2-11 Channel Habitat Types............................................................................................2-12 Channel Modifications .............................................................................................2-20
    [Show full text]
  • Tenmile Lakes Watershed Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
    Tenmile Lakes Watershed Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Prepared by: Oregon Department of Environmental Quality February 2007 Submissions by: Oregon Department of Forestry Oregon Department of Agriculture Oregon Department of Transportation Tenmile Lakes Basin Partnership TENMILE LAKES WATERSHED WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN FEBRUARY 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................I FIGURES AND TABLES.................................................................................... IV ACRONYMS........................................................................................................ V CHAPTER 1 – BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION ......................................1 1.1 TMDL WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN GUIDANCE ..................................2 1.2 WQMP REQUIRED ELEMENTS - OAR 340-042-0040 (4)(I)(A-O) .....................3 CHAPTER 2 - CONDITION ASSESSMENT AND PROBLEM DESCRIPTION OAR 340-42-0040(4)(I)(A)....................................................................................5 2.1 WATER QUALITY IMPAIRMENT .........................................................................5 2.1.1 Aquatic Weeds (Macrophytes) ...................................................................................................... 5 2.1.2 Phytoplankton (floating algae) ...................................................................................................... 6 2.1.3 Chlorophyll a................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Coos County Flood Insurance Study, P14216.AO, Scales 1:12,000 and 1:24,000, Portland, Oregon, September 1980
    FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY COOS COUNTY, OREGON AND INCORPORATED AREAS COMMUNITY COMMUNITY NAME NUMBER BANDON, CITY OF 410043 COOS BAY, CITY OF 410044 COOS COUNTY (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) 410042 COQUILLE, CITY OF 410045 LAKESIDE, CITY OF 410278 MYRTLE POINT, CITY OF 410047 NORTH BEND, CITY OF 410048 POWERS, CITY OF 410049 Revised: March 17, 2014 Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 41011CV000B NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report may not contain all data available within the Community Map Repository. Please contact the Community Map Repository for any additional data. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) may revise and republish part or all of this FIS report at any time. In addition, FEMA may revise part of this FIS report by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS report. Therefore, users should consult with community officials and check the Community Map Repository to obtain the most current FIS report components. Initial Countywide FIS Effective Date: September 25, 2009 Revised Countywide FIS Date: March 17, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Purpose of Study ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tenmile Lakes Nutrient Study Phase 2 Report
    TENMILE LAKES NUTRIENT STUDY Phase II Report November, 2002 TENMILE LAKES NUTRIENT STUDY Phase II Report Submitted by Joseph Eilersa Kellie Vachéb and Jacob Kannc E&S Environmental Chemistry, Inc. Corvallis, OR to the Tenmile Lakes Basin Partnership Lakeside, OR November, 2002 Current Affiliations _______________________ a JC Headwaters, Inc., 1912 NE 3rd Street, PMB 341, Bend, OR 97701 b Oregon State University, Dept. of BioResources Engineering, Corvallis, OR 97331 c Aquatic Ecosystem Sciences, LLC, 232 Nutley Street, Ashland, OR 97520 Tenmile Lakes Nutrient Study - Phase II Report November, 2002 Page 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES.............................................................4 LIST OF FIGURES............................................................5 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .......................................................8 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY......................................................9 A. INTRODUCTION ........................................................12 B. STUDY AREA ...........................................................14 C. METHODS ..............................................................19 1. Sampling Design......................................................19 2. Site Selection ........................................................19 3. Field Instrumentation ..................................................21 4. Field Methods ........................................................21 5. Analytical Methods ....................................................23 6. Plankton ............................................................24
    [Show full text]
  • Tenmile Lakes Watershed Assessment
    Tenmile Lakes Watershed Assessment Produced by the Tenmile Lakes Basin Partnership Table of Contents Chapter 1 ........................................................................................................................ 1-1 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1-1 Chapter 2 ........................................................................................................................ 2-1 Fish & Fish Habitat .................................................................................................... 2-1 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 2-1 Critical Questions .............................................................................................. 2-1 Fish Presence ...................................................................................................... 2-3 Species of Concern............................................................................................ 2-8 Life History .......................................................................................................... 2-9 Hatcheries, Stocking Programs, Illicit Introductions .......................... 2-9 Conclusions ........................................................................................................ 2-11 Channel Habitat Types ............................................................................................ 2-12 Channel
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Multi-Species Conservation and Management Plan ODFW
    Coastal Multi-Species Conservation and Management Plan OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE Approved by the Oregon Fish and Wildlife Commission: June 6, 2014 ODFW Mission To protect and enhance Oregon's fish and wildlife and their habitats for use and enjoyment by present and future generations Coastal Multi-Species Conservation and Management Plan June 2014 Acknowledgements Authors (alphabetical) • Jamie Anthony (ODFW) • Kevin Goodson (ODFW) • Jay Nicholas (Contractor) • Matt Falcy (ODFW) • Steve Jacobs (ODFW, retired) • Jim Owens (Cogan Owens Cogan) • Erin Gilbert (ODFW) • Dave Jepsen (ODFW) • Tom Stahl (ODFW) Contributors: Reviews, Data, and Other Assistance (alphabetical) Cogan Owens Cogan, LLC CMP STAKEHOLDER TEAMS – Alisha Morton North Coast Stratum Team – Jim Owens Mid-South Coast Stratum Team – Garry Bullard (City of Manzanita) – Bruce Bertrand (alt., South Coast Anglers) Independent Multidisciplinary – Kelly Dirksen (Conf. Tribes of Grand Ronde) – Scott Cook, Oregon Alliance for Sustainable Science Team – Ian Fergusson (ANWS) Salmon Fisheries – Robert Hughes – Melyssa Graeper (Necanicum Watershed – Nancy Molina (co-chair) – Eric Farm (alt., The Campbell Group) Council) – Carl Schreck (co-chair) – Joe Furia (The Freshwater Trust) – Mike Herbel (CCA) – J. Alan Yeakley – Tom Hoesly (The Campbell Group) – Gary Kish (NSIA) – Aaron Longton (POORT) ODFW – Mark Labhart (Tillamook County) – Lindsay Adrean – Scott McKenzie (resource producer) – Sara LaBorde (Wild Salmon Center) – Kara Anlauf-Dunn – Jim Pex (Coos County) – Ray Monroe
    [Show full text]
  • GENERAL PROVISIONS General Code Construction
    ORDINANCE 15-285 AN ORDINANCE ENACTING A CODE OF ORDINANCES FOR THE CITY OF LAKESIDE, REVISING, AMENDING, RESTATING, CODIFYING AND COMPILING CERTAIN EXISTING GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE POLITICAL SUBDIVISION DEALING WITH SUBJECTS EMBRACED IN SUCH CODE OF ORDINANCES. WHEREAS, the present general and permanent ordinances of the political subdivision are inadequately arranged and classified and are insufficient in form and substance for the complete preservation of the public peace, health, safety and general welfare of the municipality and for the proper conduct of its affairs; and WHEREAS, the Acts of the Legislature of the State of Oregon empower and authorize the political subdivisions to revise, amend, restate, codify and compile any existing ordinances and all new ordinances not heretofore adopted or published and to incorporate such ordinances into one ordinance in book form; and WHEREAS, the Legislative Authority of the Political Subdivision has authorized a general compilation, revision and codification of the ordinances of the Political Subdivision of a general and permanent nature and publication of such ordinance in book form; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to provide for the usual daily operation of the municipality and for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, safety and general welfare of the municipality that this ordinance take effect. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY OF THE POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE CITY OF LAKESIDE: Section 1. The general ordinances of the Political Subdivision as revised, amended, restated, codified, and compiled in book form are hereby adopted as and shall constitute the "Code of Ordinances of the City of Lakeside." Section 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Tenmile Lake: Life and Limnology on the Oregon Coast
    Coastal Lakes Tenmile Lake: Life and Limnology on the Oregon Coast Joe Eilers any of my lake projects have been pretty routine. You sign Mthe contract, conduct the work, deliver your report, and say goodbye to the client. Sometimes there would be follow-up work and, if fortunate, you make some friends along the way. But a few projects become very personal either because of the intense nature of the work, dangerous events, remarkable beauty of the site, or fascinating people that you encounter. For Tenmile Lake, it was all of the above. But, first a description of the lake and its origins. Tenmile Lake is officially two lakes, Tenmile Lake on the south and North Tenmile Lake to the north, both connected by a canal. However, the features of the lakes are so similar (Figure 1, Table 1), that for convenience, I’ll just to refer to them collectively as Tenmile Lake. Most Figure 1. A satellite image of Tenmile Lake (north and south) converging on the town of Lakeside. Oregon coastal lakes, such as Tenmile Clear Lake and Eel Lake are located to the north and both lakes discharge into Tenmile Creek, the (formerly called Johnson Lake), bear outlet from Tenmile Lake. The inset shows the watershed boundaries and dense stream network. relatively predictable names assigned by settlers, whereas others to the north of Tenmile still bear reminders of the Table 1. Tenmile Lake Morphometry. original inhabitants with mellifluous names such as Tahkenitch, Woahink, and North Tenmile Tenmile Combined Siltcoos. Lake Area (ac) 829 1130 1958 The Past Lake Perimeter (mi) 19.8 23.2 43 Depth (max- ft) 26.8 27 Tenmile Lake, as with most Oregon Depth (mean- ft) 14.8 16.3 coastal lakes, is a transient feature of the landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Tenmile Lakes Watershed Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL)
    Tenmile Lakes Watershed Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Prepared by: Oregon Department of Environmental Quality February 2007 Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Water Quality Division th 811 S.W. 6 Avenue Portland, OR 97204 This document can be accessed on the Internet at: http://www.deq.state.or.us/wq/TMDLs/southcoast.htm For more information contact: Pamela Blake, South Coast Basin Coordinator Department of Environmental Quality 381 N Second Coos Bay, Oregon 97420 [email protected] Eugene Foster, Manager of Watershed Management Section Department of Environmental Quality 811 Southwest 6th Avenue Portland, Oregon 97204 [email protected] John Blanchard, Western Region Watersheds Manager Department of Environmental Quality 221 Stewart Ave., Suite 201 Medford, Oregon 97501 [email protected] February 2007 Tenmile Lakes Watershed TMDL TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS.............................................................................................i LIST OF FIGURES...................................................................................................iv LIST OF TABLES .....................................................................................................v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ..........................................................................................vi STATEMENT OF PURPOSE..................................................................................vii ACRONYMS ..........................................................................................................viii
    [Show full text]
  • Confederated Tribes of the Coos, Lower Umpqua, and Siuslaw
    Tribal Integrated Water Quality Monitoring Program Surface Water & Fixed Station Quality Assurance Project Plan Version 4.0 Confederated Tribes of Coos, Lower Umpqua & Siuslaw Indians Natural Resources Department February 26, 2016 Integrated Water Quality Monitoring Program CTCLUSI Surface Water & Fixed Station QAPP 4.0 02/26/16 1 Tribal Acceptance and Approval Tribe: Confederated Tribes of Coos, Lower Umpqua, and Siuslaw Indians Address: 1245 Fulton Avenue Coos Bay, Oregon 97420 Phone Number: (541) 888-9577 Fax Number: (541) 888-2853 Tribal Chairman: Mark Ingersoll Phone Number: (541) 290-4610 Approval Signature & Date: ,fy\Mlr~Mff Tribal Administrator: Phone Number: Approval Signature & Date: Director, Department of Natural Resources: Margaret Corvi Phone Number: Approval Signature & Date: .~"7z;.,,..1l_'-,i''/'-::rr..,..s.5=•·•=·=~~~~~·.····~o -s/17 II. EPA Acceptance and Approval Agency: EPA Region 10, Tribal Trust & Assistance Unit Oregon Operations Office Address: 805 SW Broadway Suite 500 Portland, OR 97205 Phone Number: (503) 326-3250 Fax Number: (503) 326-3399 EPA Project Officer: Phone Number: Approval Signature & Date: EPA Quality Assurance Manager: Donald Brown Phone Number: (206) 553-0717 Approval Signature and Date: Integrated Water Quality Monitoring Program CTCLUSI Surlace Water & Fixed Station QAPP 4.0 02126116 2 Distribution List Copies of the completed/signed QAPP are distributed to: Confederated Tribes of Coos, Lower Umpqua, and Siuslaw Indians 1245 Fulton Avenue, Coos Bay, Oregon 97420 Alexis Barry (541) 888-9577
    [Show full text]