DOCSLIB.ORG

Stock Assessment and Optimal Escapement of Coho Salmon in Three Oregon Coastal Lakes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Stock Assessment and Optimal Escapement of Coho Salmon in Three Oregon Coastal Lakes Information Report Stock Assessment and Optimal Escapement of Coho Salmon in Three Oregon Coastal Lakes Shijie Zhou Fish Division Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife 2501 SW First Avenue PO Box 59, Portland, Oregon 97207 December 2000 Contents Contents................................................................................................................................ i List of Tables.......................................................................................................................ii List of Figures ....................................................................................................................iii Acknowledgement............................................................................................................... v Abstract ............................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 Methods............................................................................................................................... 2 Estimation of escapement ................................................................................................ 2 Estimation of recruitment ................................................................................................ 5 Freshwater harvest and terminal run................................................................................ 5 Ocean harvest and recruitment......................................................................................... 6 Stock-recruit relationship................................................................................................. 7 Estimation of management parameters............................................................................ 8 Uncertainty assessment: bootstrap and simulation .......................................................... 9 Results ............................................................................................................................... 10 Siltcoos Lake.................................................................................................................. 10 Tahkenitch Lake............................................................................................................. 12 Tenmile Lakes................................................................................................................ 14 Discussion ......................................................................................................................... 16 Reference........................................................................................................................... 19 i List of Tables Table 1. Escapements of coho salmon in Siltcoos Lake, 1960-1999............................................... 22 Table 2. Coho salmon freshwater harvests and terminal runs in Siltcoos Lake basin, 1960-1999.......................................................................................................................... 23 Table 3. Estimated adult and jack ocean harvest rates for Oregon coastal coho salmon, 1960-1999.......................................................................................................................... 24 Table 4. Spawners and recruitment of coho salmon in Siltcoos Lake, brood years 1960-1996. The ocean survival rates were estimated from coded-wire- tagged North Umpqua River hatchery coho. ..................................................................... 25 Table 5. Parameter estimates from selected models for Siltcoos Lake coho salmon....................... 26 Table 6. Escapements of coho salmon in Tahkenitch Lake, 1960-1999.......................................... 27 Table 7. Coho salmon freshwater harvests and terminal runs in Tahkenitch Lake basin, 1960-1999. .............................................................................................................. 28 Table 8. Spawners and recruitment of coho salmon in Tahkenitch Lake, brood years 1960-1996.......................................................................................................................... 29 Table 9. Parameter estimates from selected models for Tahkenitch Lake coho salmon. ................ 30 Table 10. Escapements of coho salmon and its standard error (SE) and coefficient of variance (cv) in Tenmile Lakes, 1960-1999. ..................................................................... 31 Table 11. Coho salmon freshwater harvests and terminal runs in Tenmile Lakes basin, 1960-1999.......................................................................................................................... 32 Table 12. Spawners and recruitment of coho salmon in Tenmile Lakes, brood years 1960-1996.......................................................................................................................... 33 Table 13. Parameter estimates from selected models for Tenmile Lakes coho salmon................... 34 ii List of Figures Figure 1. Location of Siltcoos, Tahkenitch, Tenmile Lakes and nearby major rivers on Oregon coast. ..................................................................................................................... 35 Figure 2. Estimated ocean recruitment and terminal run of coho salmon in Siltcoos Lake basin from 1960 to 1999........................................................................................... 36 Figure 3. Siltcoos Lake coho salmon spawner and recruitment relationship with regard to high, mean, and low ocean survival rates for Siltcoos Lake coho salmon................................................................................................................................ 36 Figure 4. Relationship between ln(R/S) and S with high (3.72%), mean (2.51%), and low (0.89%) ocean survival rates for Siltcoos Lake coho salmon. The equation was for the mean survival rate. ........................................................................... 37 Figure 5. Residuals from stock-recruitment model with weighted regression over brood years for Siltcoos Lake coho salmon....................................................................... 37 Figure 6. Residuals from stock-recruitment model with weighted regression by spawner abundance for Siltcoos Lake coho salmon.......................................................... 38 Figure 7. Residuals from stock-recruitment model by ocean survival rates for Siltcoos Lake coho salmon.............................................................................................................. 38 Figure 8. Autocorrelation among residuals from weighted regression for Siltcoos Lake coho salmon.............................................................................................................. 39 Figure 9. Distribution and 90% confidence intervals for Smsy and Smsp from Monte Carlo simulations for Siltcoos Lake coho salmon. ............................................................ 39 Figure 10. Distribution of Umsy and Umsp from stochastic simulations for Siltcoos Lake coho salmon.............................................................................................................. 40 Figure 11. Adult escapements of coho salmon in Siltcoos Lake from 1960 to 1999 with regard to escapement goals........................................................................................ 40 Figure 12. Estimated ocean recruitment and terminal run of coho salmon in Tahkenitch Lake basin from 1960 to 1999........................................................................ 41 Figure 13. Tahkenitch Lake coho salmon spawner and recruitment relationship with regard to high, mean, and low ocean survival rates........................................................... 41 Figure 14. Relationship between ln(R/S) and S under mean (2.51%) ocean survival rates for Tahkenitch Lake coho salmon............................................................................. 42 iii Figure 15. Residuals from stock-recruitment Model 2 (see text) over brood years for Tahkenitch Lake coho salmon........................................................................................... 42 Figure 16. Residuals from stock-recruitment model by spawner abundance for Tahkenitch Lake coho salmon........................................................................................... 43 Figure 17. Residuals from stock-recruitment model by ocean survival rates for Tahkenitch Lake coho salmon........................................................................................... 43 Figure 18. Autocorrelation among residuals from weighted regression for Tahkenitch Lake coho salmon.............................................................................................................. 44 Figure 19. Distribution and 90% confidence intervals for Smsy and Smsp from Monte Carlo simulations for Tahkenitch Lake coho salmon........................................................ 44 Figure 20. Distribution of Umsy and Umsp from stochastic simulations for Tahkenitch Lake coho salmon.............................................................................................................. 45 Figure 21. Adult escapement of coho salmon in Tahkenitch Lake from 1960 to 1999 with regard to escapement goals........................................................................................ 45 Figure 22. Estimated
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Volume I: Trail Maps, Research Methods & Historical Accounts
    Coquille Indian Tribe Cultural Geography Project Coquelle Trails: Early Historical Roads and Trails of Ancestral Coquille Indian Lands, 1826 - 1875 Volume I: Trail Maps, Research Methods & Historical Accounts Report Prepared by: Bob Zybach, Program Manager Oregon Websites and Watersheds Project, Inc. & Don Ivy, Manager Coquille Indian Tribe Historic Preservation Office – Cultural Resources Program North Bend, Oregon January 4, 2013 Preface Coquelle Trails: Early Historical Roads and Trails of Ancestral Coquille Indian Lands, 1826 - 1875 renews a project originally started in 2006 to investigate and publish a “cultural geography” of the modern Coquille Indian Tribe: a description of the physical landscape and geographic area occupied or utilized by the Ancestors of the modern Coquille Tribe prior to -- and at the time of -- the earliest reported contacts with Europeans and Euro- Americans. Coquelle Trails is the first of what is expected to be several installments that will complete this renewed Cultural Geography Project. Although ships and sailors made contact with Indians in earlier years, the focus of this report begins with the first historical land-based contacts between Indians and foreigners along the rivers and beaches of Oregon’s south coast. Those few and brief encounters are documented in poorly written and often incomplete journals of men who, without maps or a true fix on their locations, wandered into and across the lands of Hanis, Miluk, and Athapaskan speaking Indians in what is today Coos and Curry Counties. Those wanderings were the first surges of the tidal wave of America’s Manifest Destiny that would soon wash over the Indians and their country.
    [Show full text]
  • Management Implications of Co-Occurring Native and Introduced Fishes
    Management Implications of Co-occurring Native and Introduced Fishes Proceedings of the Workshop October 27-28, 1998 Portland, Oregon Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife National Marine Fisheries Service April 1999 Recommended Citation: Entire Proceedings ODFW and NMFS. 1999. Management Implications of Co-occurring Native and Introduced Fishes: Proceedings of the Workshop. October 27-28, 1998, Portland, Oregon. 243 pgs. Available from: National Marine Fisheries Service, 525 N.E. Oregon St., Suite 510, Portland, OR 97232. Specific Paper Karchesky, C.M and D. H. Bennett. 1999. Dietary overlap between introduced fishes and juvenile salmonids in Lower Granite Reservoir, Idaho-Washington. In ODFW and NMFS. 1999. Management Implications of Co-occurring Native and Introduced Fishes: Proceedings of the Workshop. October 27-28, 1998, Portland, Oregon. 243 pgs. Available from: National Marine Fisheries Service, 525 N.E. Oregon St., Suite 510, Portland, OR 97232. Management Implications of Co-occurring Native and Introduced Fishes Proceedings of the Workshop October 27-28, 1998 Portland, Oregon Hosted by: Fish Division Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife & Sustainable Fisheries Division National Marine Fisheries Service April 1999 These Proceedings contain unedited, non-peer reviewed papers (unless otherwise specified) of oral presentations given at the workshop “Management Implications of Co- occurring Native and Introduced Fishes” held in Portland, Oregon, on October 27-28, 1998. Although care was taken to present the information in an accurate, standardized manner, errors may exist. Please contact the authors before interpreting or quoting any information presented. Reference in this document to trade names does not imply endorsement by the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife or the National Marine Fisheries Service.
    [Show full text]
  • A Classification of Lakes in the Coast Range Ecoregion with Respect to Nutrient Processing EPA 910-R-05-002 December 2005
    EPA 910-R-05-002 Alaska United States Region 10 Idaho Environmental Protection 1200 Sixth Avenue Oregon Agency Seattle WA 98101 Washington Office of Water & Watersheds December 2005 A Classification of Lakes in the Coast Range Ecoregion with Respect to Nutrient Processing EPA 910-R-05-002 December 2005 A CLASSIFICATION OF LAKES IN THE COAST RANGE ECOREGION WITH RESPECT TO NUTRIENT PROCESSING R.M. Vaga, US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water and Watersheds, Region 10, 1200 Sixth Ave. Seattle, WA 98101 R.R. Petersen, M.M. Sytsma and M. Rosenkrantz, Environmental Sciences and Resources, Portland State University, Portland Oregon, 97202 A.T. Herlihy, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University, 104 Nash Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331 DISCLAIMER The information in this document has been funded wholly or in part by the United States Environmental Protection Agency. It has been subjected to the Agency’s peer and administrative review and it has been approved for publication as an EPA document. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. (Cover photo: An unnamed dune lake on the Southern Oregon coast. Photo by R.M. Vaga) ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT .................................................................................................. iv 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................... 1 2 LAKE INVENTORY ................................................................................... 2
    [Show full text]
  • Tenmile Lakes Watershed Assessment Produced by The
    Tenmile Lakes Watershed Assessment Produced by the Tenmile Lakes Basin Partnership Table of Contents Chapter 1 ........................................................................................................................1-1 Introduction................................................................................................................1-1 Chapter 2 ........................................................................................................................2-1 Fish & Fish Habitat ....................................................................................................2-1 Introduction ........................................................................................................2-1 Critical Questions ..............................................................................................2-2 Fish Presence......................................................................................................2-3 Species of Concern............................................................................................2-8 Life History ..........................................................................................................2-9 Hatcheries, Stocking Programs, Illicit Introductions..........................2-9 Conclusions........................................................................................................2-11 Channel Habitat Types............................................................................................2-12 Channel Modifications .............................................................................................2-20
    [Show full text]
  • Tenmile Lakes Watershed Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
    Tenmile Lakes Watershed Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Prepared by: Oregon Department of Environmental Quality February 2007 Submissions by: Oregon Department of Forestry Oregon Department of Agriculture Oregon Department of Transportation Tenmile Lakes Basin Partnership TENMILE LAKES WATERSHED WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN FEBRUARY 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................I FIGURES AND TABLES.................................................................................... IV ACRONYMS........................................................................................................ V CHAPTER 1 – BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION ......................................1 1.1 TMDL WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN GUIDANCE ..................................2 1.2 WQMP REQUIRED ELEMENTS - OAR 340-042-0040 (4)(I)(A-O) .....................3 CHAPTER 2 - CONDITION ASSESSMENT AND PROBLEM DESCRIPTION OAR 340-42-0040(4)(I)(A)....................................................................................5 2.1 WATER QUALITY IMPAIRMENT .........................................................................5 2.1.1 Aquatic Weeds (Macrophytes) ...................................................................................................... 5 2.1.2 Phytoplankton (floating algae) ...................................................................................................... 6 2.1.3 Chlorophyll a................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Coos County Flood Insurance Study, P14216.AO, Scales 1:12,000 and 1:24,000, Portland, Oregon, September 1980
    FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY COOS COUNTY, OREGON AND INCORPORATED AREAS COMMUNITY COMMUNITY NAME NUMBER BANDON, CITY OF 410043 COOS BAY, CITY OF 410044 COOS COUNTY (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) 410042 COQUILLE, CITY OF 410045 LAKESIDE, CITY OF 410278 MYRTLE POINT, CITY OF 410047 NORTH BEND, CITY OF 410048 POWERS, CITY OF 410049 Revised: March 17, 2014 Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 41011CV000B NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report may not contain all data available within the Community Map Repository. Please contact the Community Map Repository for any additional data. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) may revise and republish part or all of this FIS report at any time. In addition, FEMA may revise part of this FIS report by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS report. Therefore, users should consult with community officials and check the Community Map Repository to obtain the most current FIS report components. Initial Countywide FIS Effective Date: September 25, 2009 Revised Countywide FIS Date: March 17, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Purpose of Study ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Siltcoos Lake Nonpoint Source Implementation Grant: Water Quality Conditions and Nutrient Sources
    Portland State University PDXScholar Center for Lakes and Reservoirs Publications and Presentations Center for Lakes and Reservoirs 3-2010 Siltcoos Lake Nonpoint Source Implementation Grant: Water Quality Conditions and Nutrient Sources Mark D. Sytsma Portland State University, [email protected] Rich Miller Portland State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/centerforlakes_pub Part of the Environmental Indicators and Impact Assessment Commons, Environmental Monitoring Commons, and the Water Resource Management Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details Sytsma, Mark D. and Miller, Rich, "Siltcoos Lake Nonpoint Source Implementation Grant: Water Quality Conditions and Nutrient Sources" (2010). Center for Lakes and Reservoirs Publications and Presentations. 52. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/centerforlakes_pub/52 This Report is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Center for Lakes and Reservoirs Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY, CENTER FOR LAKES AND RESERVOIRS Siltcoos Lake Nonpoint Source Implementation Grant Water quality conditions and nutrient sources Mark Sytsma and Rich Miller, Portland State University, Center for Lakes and Reservoirs 3/18/2010 Final report to the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality for project number W08714 Siltcoos Lake
    [Show full text]
  • Volume II Appendix F
    Volume II –Appendix F - Fisheries Appendix F – Fisheries Table of Contents 1. FISHERIES...................................................................................................... 1 2. FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE FISHERIES ................................................... 1 2.A. Water Quality..................................................................................................................................... 2 2.B. Water Quantity and Physical Habitat.............................................................................................. 2 3. ENHANCEMENT PROGRAMS....................................................................... 3 4. ASSESSMENT OF FISH RESOURCES............................................................ 4 5. BASIN OVERVIEW......................................................................................... 5 6. SUB-BASIN DISCUSSION ............................................................................... 6 6.A. Coastal / Umpqua River Sub-basins................................................................................................. 7 6.A.1. Minimum Flows ................................................................................................................................. 7 6.A.2. Distribution and Abundance............................................................................................................... 7 6.A.3. Recreation........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tenmile Lakes Nutrient Study Phase 2 Report
    TENMILE LAKES NUTRIENT STUDY Phase II Report November, 2002 TENMILE LAKES NUTRIENT STUDY Phase II Report Submitted by Joseph Eilersa Kellie Vachéb and Jacob Kannc E&S Environmental Chemistry, Inc. Corvallis, OR to the Tenmile Lakes Basin Partnership Lakeside, OR November, 2002 Current Affiliations _______________________ a JC Headwaters, Inc., 1912 NE 3rd Street, PMB 341, Bend, OR 97701 b Oregon State University, Dept. of BioResources Engineering, Corvallis, OR 97331 c Aquatic Ecosystem Sciences, LLC, 232 Nutley Street, Ashland, OR 97520 Tenmile Lakes Nutrient Study - Phase II Report November, 2002 Page 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES.............................................................4 LIST OF FIGURES............................................................5 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .......................................................8 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY......................................................9 A. INTRODUCTION ........................................................12 B. STUDY AREA ...........................................................14 C. METHODS ..............................................................19 1. Sampling Design......................................................19 2. Site Selection ........................................................19 3. Field Instrumentation ..................................................21 4. Field Methods ........................................................21 5. Analytical Methods ....................................................23 6. Plankton ............................................................24
    [Show full text]
  • Tenmile Lakes Watershed Assessment
    Tenmile Lakes Watershed Assessment Produced by the Tenmile Lakes Basin Partnership Table of Contents Chapter 1 ........................................................................................................................ 1-1 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1-1 Chapter 2 ........................................................................................................................ 2-1 Fish & Fish Habitat .................................................................................................... 2-1 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 2-1 Critical Questions .............................................................................................. 2-1 Fish Presence ...................................................................................................... 2-3 Species of Concern............................................................................................ 2-8 Life History .......................................................................................................... 2-9 Hatcheries, Stocking Programs, Illicit Introductions .......................... 2-9 Conclusions ........................................................................................................ 2-11 Channel Habitat Types ............................................................................................ 2-12 Channel
    [Show full text]
  • LANE COUNTY OREGON MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Page | 46
    3. RISK ASSESSMENT 44 CFR Requirement §201.6(c) (2) [The plan shall include] A risk assessment that provides the factual basis for activities proposed in the strategy to reduce losses from identified hazards. Local risk assessments must provide sufficient information to enable the jurisdiction to identify and prioritize appropriate mitigation actions to reduce losses from identified hazards The purpose of risk assessment is to identify and describe hazards that affect Lane County and analyze potential losses for human life and material assets. Through better understanding of potential hazards and the degree of risk they pose, more successful mitigation strategies can be developed and implemented. This risk assessment follows the four-step process described in the FEMA publication 386-2, Understanding Your Risks: Identifying Hazards and Estimating Losses, listed as follows: Step 1: Identify Hazards Step 2: Profile Hazard Events Step 3: Inventory Assets Step 4: Estimate Losses This section is organized into three subsections that address the four steps of the risk assessment process. 3.1 Identifying Hazards. This subsection addresses Step 1 and lists the hazards considered during the planning process and those ultimately profiled in the plan. It also describes methods, definitions and data sources used for the hazard identification and profile process. 3.2 Hazard Profile. This subsection addresses Step 2 and presents a detailed outline for each identified hazard. Each hazard profile is addressed as a plan subsection and includes a general description, affected geographic area, and discussion of previous occurrences, probability of future occurrence, magnitude and severity and an assessment of overall vulnerability to each hazard.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Multi-Species Conservation and Management Plan ODFW
    Coastal Multi-Species Conservation and Management Plan OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE Approved by the Oregon Fish and Wildlife Commission: June 6, 2014 ODFW Mission To protect and enhance Oregon's fish and wildlife and their habitats for use and enjoyment by present and future generations Coastal Multi-Species Conservation and Management Plan June 2014 Acknowledgements Authors (alphabetical) • Jamie Anthony (ODFW) • Kevin Goodson (ODFW) • Jay Nicholas (Contractor) • Matt Falcy (ODFW) • Steve Jacobs (ODFW, retired) • Jim Owens (Cogan Owens Cogan) • Erin Gilbert (ODFW) • Dave Jepsen (ODFW) • Tom Stahl (ODFW) Contributors: Reviews, Data, and Other Assistance (alphabetical) Cogan Owens Cogan, LLC CMP STAKEHOLDER TEAMS – Alisha Morton North Coast Stratum Team – Jim Owens Mid-South Coast Stratum Team – Garry Bullard (City of Manzanita) – Bruce Bertrand (alt., South Coast Anglers) Independent Multidisciplinary – Kelly Dirksen (Conf. Tribes of Grand Ronde) – Scott Cook, Oregon Alliance for Sustainable Science Team – Ian Fergusson (ANWS) Salmon Fisheries – Robert Hughes – Melyssa Graeper (Necanicum Watershed – Nancy Molina (co-chair) – Eric Farm (alt., The Campbell Group) Council) – Carl Schreck (co-chair) – Joe Furia (The Freshwater Trust) – Mike Herbel (CCA) – J. Alan Yeakley – Tom Hoesly (The Campbell Group) – Gary Kish (NSIA) – Aaron Longton (POORT) ODFW – Mark Labhart (Tillamook County) – Lindsay Adrean – Scott McKenzie (resource producer) – Sara LaBorde (Wild Salmon Center) – Kara Anlauf-Dunn – Jim Pex (Coos County) – Ray Monroe
    [Show full text]