DOCSLIB.ORG

A Preserved Distal Articular Cartilage Capsule at a Humerus of the Sauropod Dinosaur Cetiosauriscus Greppini and Its Taphonomical and Palaeobiological Implications

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Preserved Distal Articular Cartilage Capsule at a Humerus of the Sauropod Dinosaur Cetiosauriscus Greppini and Its Taphonomical and Palaeobiological Implications 4TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION OF VERTEBRATE PALAEONTOLOGISTS A preserved distal articular cartilage capsule at a humerus of the sauropod dinosaur Cetiosauriscus greppini and its taphonomical and palaeobiological implications Oliver WINGS1, Daniela SCHWARZ2 & Christian A. MEYER2 1 Institut für Geowissenschaften, Universität Tübingen, Sigwartstrasse 10, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany, e-mail: [email protected]; 2 Naturhistorisches Museum Basel, Augustinergasse 2, CH-4001 Basel, Switzerland, e-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Re-examination of the holotype of the sauropod explained by different diagenetical conditions, patho- dinosaur Cetiosauriscus greppini Huene, 1922 (Reuche- logic mineralization at this bone caused by a meta- nette Formation; Kimmeridgian, Late Jurassic) from bolic disease, or an accidental removal of preserved northwestern Switzerland has revealed a well-pre- cartilage during the original preparation. served cartilage capsule at the distal extremity of the The position of the cartilage around the distal right humerus (Naturhistorisches Museum Basel MH limb surface allows its interpretation as a remnant of 260). The studied forelimb belongs to an adult the articular cartilage of the distal humerus. In life, individual of approximately 10 m body length. The this cartilage would most probably have been in cartilage tissue was studied macroscopically and contact with similar articular cartilage of the ulna and microscopically. For a histological study, a core of radius. The reconstructed articular cartilage capsule cartilage and bone material was extracted from the extends approximately from one sixth to one third of cranial face of the distal extremity of the humerus, the distal side of the humerus, and suggests that processed into a standard petrographic thin section, sauropod dinosaurs possessed large articular limb and examined with light microscopy and SEM-EDX. capsules. The capsule represents hydrocartilage together The reconstructed articular cartilage capsule with fibrocartilage and can be distinguished by covers all insertion scars (e.g. medial and lateral ridge, colour, surface structure, and histology from the olecranon fossa, ent- and ectepicondylus) present at periosteum of the bone. It is plausible that the the distal humerus. Limb muscles must have inserted preserved cartilage represents the growth zone of the at the distal humerus tendinously or aponeurotically. bone with only the underlying layer of mineralized If the mineralization of the hyaline cartilage and cartilage being fossilized. This is the first evidence for tendon fibres is not pathologic, it might have been an fossil articular cartilage in a sauropodomorph dino- adaptative mechanism in response to mechanical saur. Hitherto, mineralized cartilage in sauropods was forces acting on this joint. only known from sternal or distal rib elements. None The present humerus verifies the assumption that of the other limb bones shows similar cartilage limb lengths of sauropods must have been larger preservation, although it its most likely that all limb than apparent from the bones alone. Although the bones in sauropods were covered by articular distal cartilage capsule is not completely preserved, cartilage at their epiphyses. we estimate an overall cartilage thickness of at least The taphonomical reasons leading to the cartilage 3-5 cm between humerus and antebrachium. preservation are puzzling. The bones of C. greppini are Comparisons with extant archosaurs imply that the strongly compressed and fractured, but the surround- humerus length of C. greppini was 6 to 10% larger ing sediment with rhizoliths indicates very limited than previously thought. It is plausible that the height transport. In vivo mineralization of the cartilage surely to shoulder, and possibly hip, of all sauropod dino- enhanced its preservation potential. The missing saurs has been hitherto under-estimated, making cartilage on other bones of C. greppini may be these largest of land animals even larger. 111.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dinosaurs British Isles
    DINOSAURS of the BRITISH ISLES Dean R. Lomax & Nobumichi Tamura Foreword by Dr Paul M. Barrett (Natural History Museum, London) Skeletal reconstructions by Scott Hartman, Jaime A. Headden & Gregory S. Paul Life and scene reconstructions by Nobumichi Tamura & James McKay CONTENTS Foreword by Dr Paul M. Barrett.............................................................................10 Foreword by the authors........................................................................................11 Acknowledgements................................................................................................12 Museum and institutional abbreviations...............................................................13 Introduction: An age-old interest..........................................................................16 What is a dinosaur?................................................................................................18 The question of birds and the ‘extinction’ of the dinosaurs..................................25 The age of dinosaurs..............................................................................................30 Taxonomy: The naming of species.......................................................................34 Dinosaur classification...........................................................................................37 Saurischian dinosaurs............................................................................................39 Theropoda............................................................................................................39
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Description of the Sauropod Dinosaur Amanzia (“Ornithopsis
    Schwarz et al. Swiss J Geosci (2020) 113:2 https://doi.org/10.1186/s00015-020-00355-5 Swiss Journal of Geosciences ORIGINAL PAPER Open Access Re-description of the sauropod dinosaur Amanzia (“Ornithopsis/Cetiosauriscus”) greppini n. gen. and other vertebrate remains from the Kimmeridgian (Late Jurassic) Reuchenette Formation of Moutier, Switzerland Daniela Schwarz1* , Philip D. Mannion2 , Oliver Wings3 and Christian A. Meyer4 Abstract Dinosaur remains were discovered in the 1860’s in the Kimmeridgian (Late Jurassic) Reuchenette Formation of Moutier, northwestern Switzerland. In the 1920’s, these were identifed as a new species of sauropod, Ornithopsis greppini, before being reclassifed as a species of Cetiosauriscus (C. greppini), otherwise known from the type species (C. stewarti) from the late Middle Jurassic (Callovian) of the UK. The syntype of “C. greppini” consists of skeletal elements from all body regions, and at least four individuals of diferent sizes can be distinguished. Here we fully re-describe this material, and re-evaluate its taxonomy and systematic placement. The Moutier locality also yielded a theropod tooth, and fragmen- tary cranial and vertebral remains of a crocodylomorph, also re-described here. “C.” greppini is a small-sized (not more than 10 m long) non-neosauropod eusauropod. Cetiosauriscus stewarti and “C.” greppini difer from each other in: (1) size; (2) the neural spine morphology and diapophyseal laminae of the anterior caudal vertebrae; (3) the length-to-height proportion in the middle caudal vertebrae; (4) the presence or absence of ridges and crests on the middle caudal cen- tra; and (5) the shape and proportions of the coracoid, humerus, and femur.
    [Show full text]
  • Osteological Revision of the Holotype of the Middle
    Osteological revision of the holotype of the Middle Jurassic sauropod dinosaur Patagosaurus fariasi (Sauropoda: Cetiosauridae) BONAPARTE 1979 Femke Holwerda, Oliver W.M. Rauhut, Pol Diego To cite this version: Femke Holwerda, Oliver W.M. Rauhut, Pol Diego. Osteological revision of the holotype of the Middle Jurassic sauropod dinosaur Patagosaurus fariasi (Sauropoda: Cetiosauridae) BONAPARTE 1979. 2020. hal-02977029 HAL Id: hal-02977029 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02977029 Preprint submitted on 27 Oct 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. 1 Osteological revision of the holotype of the Middle Jurassic sauropod 2 dinosaur Patagosaurus fariasi (Sauropoda: Cetiosauridae) 3 BONAPARTE 1979 4 5 Femke M Holwerda1234, Oliver W M Rauhut156, Diego Pol78 6 7 1 Staatliche Naturwissenscha�liche Sammlungen Bayerns (SNSB), Bayerische Staatssamlung für 8 Paläontologie und Geologie, Richard-Wagner-Strasse 10, 80333 München, Germany 9 10 2 Department of Geosciences, Utrecht University, Princetonlaan, 3584 CD Utrecht, 10 Netherlands 11 12 3 Royal Tyrrell Museum of Palaeontology, Drumheller, AlbertaT0J 0Y0, Canada (current) 13 14 4 Fachgruppe Paläoumwelt, GeoZentrum Nordbayern, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen- 15 Nürnberg, Loewenichstr. 28, 91054 Erlangen, Germany 16 17 5 Department für Umwelt- und Geowissenscha�en, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Richard- 18 Wagner-Str.
    [Show full text]
  • Back Matter (PDF)
    Index Note: Page numbers in italic denote figures. Page numbers in bold denote tables. Abel, Othenio (1875–1946) Ashmolean Museum, Oxford, Robert Plot 7 arboreal theory 244 Astrodon 363, 365 Geschichte und Methode der Rekonstruktion... Atlantosaurus 365, 366 (1925) 328–329, 330 Augusta, Josef (1903–1968) 222–223, 331 Action comic 343 Aulocetus sammarinensis 80 Actualism, work of Capellini 82, 87 Azara, Don Felix de (1746–1821) 34, 40–41 Aepisaurus 363 Azhdarchidae 318, 319 Agassiz, Louis (1807–1873) 80, 81 Azhdarcho 319 Agustinia 380 Alexander, Annie Montague (1867–1950) 142–143, 143, Bakker, Robert. T. 145, 146 ‘dinosaur renaissance’ 375–376, 377 Alf, Karen (1954–2000), illustrator 139–140 Dinosaurian monophyly 93, 246 Algoasaurus 365 influence on graphic art 335, 343, 350 Allosaurus, digits 267, 271, 273 Bara Simla, dinosaur discoveries 164, 166–169 Allosaurus fragilis 85 Baryonyx walkeri Altispinax, pneumaticity 230–231 relation to Spinosaurus 175, 177–178, 178, 181, 183 Alum Shale Member, Parapsicephalus purdoni 195 work of Charig 94, 95, 102, 103 Amargasaurus 380 Beasley, Henry Charles (1836–1919) Amphicoelias 365, 366, 368, 370 Chirotherium 214–215, 219 amphisbaenians, work of Charig 95 environment 219–220 anatomy, comparative 23 Beaux, E. Cecilia (1855–1942), illustrator 138, 139, 146 Andrews, Roy Chapman (1884–1960) 69, 122 Becklespinax altispinax, pneumaticity 230–231, Andrews, Yvette 122 232, 363 Anning, Joseph (1796–1849) 14 belemnites, Oxford Clay Formation, Peterborough Anning, Mary (1799–1847) 24, 25, 113–116, 114, brick pits 53 145, 146, 147, 288 Benett, Etheldred (1776–1845) 117, 146 Dimorphodon macronyx 14, 115, 294 Bhattacharji, Durgansankar 166 Hawker’s ‘Crocodile’ 14 Birch, Lt.
    [Show full text]
  • Short Review of the Present Knowledge of the Sauropoda
    PRESENT KNOWLEDGE OF THE SAUROl'ODA.-HUENE. 121 SHORT REVIEW OF THE PRESENT KNOWLEDGE OF THE SAUROPODA. BY DR. FRIEDRICH BARON HUENE, PROFESSOR AT THE UNIVERSITY OF TUBINGEN, GERMANY. THE Sauropoda are the hugest continental animals the earth has ever seen. They lived from the middle Jurassic to the Danian period of the upper­ most Cretaceous. Much has been written about them, but nevertheless their natura! classification and development do not yet appear in a desirable clearness. In this respect the immense size of the Sauropoda has been an obstacle. The satisfactory excavation of such gigant.ic skeletons is difficult, and the preparation, which is still more important, needs trained, skilful men working for years. The scientific value of a skeleton is determined in advance by the degree of care by which, during the excavation, the original articulation or the original positions of the bones to each other in the rock is dealt "\vith by sketch-plans in scale as to make sure specially the sequence of the vertebræ. Because of the failure of this in many cases, we still know so astonishingly little about the natura! classification of the Sauropoda as a whole. Most has been written and spoken on the North American Sauropoda. Too little has been done with the earlier Sauropoda. The knowledge of the Upper Cretaceous Sauropoda until now is quite insufficient. The large amount of Tendaguru Sauropoda at Berlin and the recent excavations of the Carnegie Museum at Pittsburgh have not yet been described ; they will probably complete and alter our ideas of the development and classification of the Sauropoda.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vertebral Column of Brachiosaurus Brancai
    THE VERTEBRAL COLUMN OF BRACHIOSAURUS BRANCAI BY W. JANENSCH WITH PLATES I – V. 136 FIGURES IN TEXT AND SOME 7 TEXT SUPPLEMENTS Palaeontographica, 1950 Supplement VII, 1 Reihe, Teil III, Lieferung 2, p. 27-93. Translated by Gerhard Maier March 2007 Contents. Page Foreword 31 Presacral vertebrae 33 Material 33 Description 34 External architecture of the presacral vertebrae of sauropods 34 Proatlas 37 1st presacral vertebra, atlas 37 2nd presacral vertebra, axis 38 3rd to 24th presacral vertebra 40 Surface sculpture 52 Structure of the centrum 52 Sacrum 56 Caudal vertebrae 60 Material 60 Description 60 Comparison of the various discoveries of caudal vertebrae 66 Length of individual sections of the vertebral column 68 Characterization of the vertebral column of Brachiosaurus 68 Function of the articulations 69 Ligament connections between the vertebrae 70 About the muscles of the vertebral column 71 Comparison of the vertebral column of Brachiosaurus brancai with other sauropods 72 Ribs of the cervical vertebrae (2nd to 13th presacral vertebra) 78 Material, fusion 78 Rib of the axis 79 Description 79 Question of association 81 Differentiation of the rib of the axis and attempt at interpretation as secondary sexual characteristic 81 Ribs of the 3rd to 13th cervical vertebra 82 Description 82 Comparison 84 Functional significance of the cervical ribs 85 Ribs of the dorsal vertebrae 86 Description 86 Comparison 88 Significance of the differences in rib strength 89 Haemapophyses 90 Summary of the results 91 Literature 92 Explanation of the plates 93 Foreword. Although remains of Brachiosaurus are relatively abundant in the Tendaguru Beds, vertebrae of satisfactory preservation were frequently only found from the caudal region.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Diplodocoid Sauropod Dinosaur from the Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation of Montana, USA
    A new diplodocoid sauropod dinosaur from the Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation of Montana, USA JERALD D. HARRIS and PETER DODSON Harris, J.D. and Dodson, P. 2004. A new diplodocoid sauropod dinosaur from the Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation of Montana, USA. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 49 (2): 197–210. A partial skeleton of a new sauropod dinosaur from the Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation (?Tithonian) of Montana is described. Suuwassea emilieae gen. et sp. nov. is diagnosed by numerous cranial, axial, and appendicular autapo− morphies. The holotype consists of a premaxilla, partial maxilla, quadrate, braincase with partial skull roof, several partial and complete cranial and middle cervical, cranial dorsal, and caudal vertebrae, ribs, complete scapulocoracoid, humerus, partial tibia, complete fibula, calcaneus, and partial pes. It displays numerous synapomorphies of the Diplodocoidea, in− cluding characters of both the Diplodocidae (Apatosaurus +(Diplodocus + Barosaurus)) and Dicraeosauridae (Dicraeo− saurus + Amargasaurus). Preliminary phylogenetic analysis indicates that Suuwassea is a diplodocoid more derived than rebbachisaurids but in a trichotomy with both the Diplodocidae and Dicraeosauridae. Suuwassea represents the first well−supported, North American, non−diplodocid representative of the Diplodocoidea and provides new insight into the origins of both the Diplodocidae and Dicraeosauridae. Key words: Dinosauria, Diplodocoidea, Diplodocidae, Dicraeosauridae, paleobiogeography, phylogeny, Morrison Forma− tion, Jurassic. Jerald
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Sauropod Locomotion
    eight The Evolution of Sauropod Locomotion MORPHOLOGICAL DIVERSITY OF A SECONDARILY QUADRUPEDAL RADIATION Matthew T. Carrano Sauropod dinosaur locomotion, fruitful but also have tended to become canal- like that of many extinct groups, has his- ized. In this regard, the words of paleontologist torically been interpreted in light of potential W. C. Coombs (1975:23) remain particularly apt, modern analogues. As these analogies—along as much for their still-relevant summary of the with our understanding of them—have shifted, status quo in sauropod locomotor research as perspectives on sauropod locomotion have fol- for their warning to future workers: lowed. Thus early paleontologists focused on the “whalelike” aspects of these presumably aquatic It is a subtle trap, the ease with which an entire reptilian suborder can have its habits and habi- taxa (e.g., Osborn 1898), reluctantly relinquish- tat preferences deduced by comparison not ing such ideas as further discoveries began to with all proboscideans, not with the family characterize sauropod anatomy as more terres- Elephantidae, not with a particular genus or trial. Although this debate continued for over a even a single species, but by comparison with century, the essentially terrestrial nature of certain populations of a single subspecies. Deciding that a particular modern animal is sauropod limb design was recognized by the most like sauropods is no guarantee of solving early 1900s (Hatcher 1903; Riggs 1903). Aside the problem of sauropod behavior. from a few poorly received attempts (e.g., Hay 1908; Tornier 1909), comparisons have usually Similarly, modern analogues play a limited been made between sauropods and terrestrial role in illuminating the evolution of sauropod mammals, rather than reptiles.
    [Show full text]
  • Download a PDF of This Web Page Here. Visit
    Dinosaur Genera List Page 1 of 42 You are visitor number— Zales Jewelry —as of November 7, 2008 The Dinosaur Genera List became a standalone website on December 4, 2000 on America Online’s Hometown domain. AOL closed the domain down on Halloween, 2008, so the List was carried over to the www.polychora.com domain in early November, 2008. The final visitor count before AOL Hometown was closed down was 93661, on October 30, 2008. List last updated 12/15/17 Additions and corrections entered since the last update are in green. Genera counts (but not totals) changed since the last update appear in green cells. Download a PDF of this web page here. Visit my Go Fund Me web page here. Go ahead, contribute a few bucks to the cause! Visit my eBay Store here. Search for “paleontology.” Unfortunately, as of May 2011, Adobe changed its PDF-creation website and no longer supports making PDFs directly from HTML files. I finally figured out a way around this problem, but the PDF no longer preserves background colors, such as the green backgrounds in the genera counts. Win some, lose some. Return to Dinogeorge’s Home Page. Generic Name Counts Scientifically Valid Names Scientifically Invalid Names Non- Letter Well Junior Rejected/ dinosaurian Doubtful Preoccupied Vernacular Totals (click) established synonyms forgotten (valid or invalid) file://C:\Documents and Settings\George\Desktop\Paleo Papers\dinolist.html 12/15/2017 Dinosaur Genera List Page 2 of 42 A 117 20 8 2 1 8 15 171 B 56 5 1 0 0 11 5 78 C 70 15 5 6 0 10 9 115 D 55 12 7 2 0 5 6 87 E 48 4 3
    [Show full text]
  • The Cretaceous Dinosaur from Shantung (VI) 2
    (VI) 1 Palæontologia Sinica Series C. Vol. VI. Fascicle 1. PALÆONTOLOGIA SINICA Editors: V. K. Ting and W. H. Wong T h e C r e t a c e o u s D i n o s a u r f r o m S h a n t u n g BY C A R L W I M A N U P S A L A Published by the Geological Survey of China Peking 1929 Translator: Nadja Insel, University of Michigan, Department of Geological Sciences, Ann Arbor, Michigan USA. Translation Editors: Jeffrey A. Wilson and John A. Whitlock, University of Michigan, Museum of Paleontology & Department of Geological Sciences, Ann Arbor, Michigan USA. 31 July 2007 Wiman—The Cretaceous Dinosaur from Shantung (VI) 2 INTRODUCTION The Chinese geologist, Dr C.H. T’an, has described the geology of the Chinese field area and the history of discovery of dinosaurs in East Asia in a work that was published in 1923 in Beijing (32. S.95). For more information see that work; I want to present only a very short report about the historical data and the geological age of the dinosaurs. HISTORY T’an (32. S.122) writes about the oldest fossil records of dinosaurs in east Asia: “The first scientific note, communicated by Dr. A. N. Kryshtofovich, on the occurrence on the Amur of vertebrate remains which later proved to belong to Dinosaurs was published in ‘Annuaire de minéralogie et géologie de la Russie’ par N. J. Krischtafovitsch in 1902, where it is stated that bones from these beds were known to the local cossacks and that some specimens were brought to the museum of Blagoweshchensk as ‘bones of mammoth’.” In 1914, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Wide-Gauge Sauropod Trackways from the Early Jurassic of Sichuan, China: Oldest Sauropod Trackways from Asia with Special Emphasis on a Specimen Showing a Narrow Turn
    Swiss J Geosci (2016) 109:415–428 DOI 10.1007/s00015-016-0229-0 Wide-gauge sauropod trackways from the Early Jurassic of Sichuan, China: oldest sauropod trackways from Asia with special emphasis on a specimen showing a narrow turn 1 2 3 4 4 Lida Xing • Martin G. Lockley • Daniel Marty • Jianjun He • Xufeng Hu • 4 5 6 6 7 Hui Dai • Masaki Matsukawa • Guangzhao Peng • Yong Ye • Hendrik Klein • 1 6 8 Jianping Zhang • Baoqiao Hao • W. Scott Persons IV Received: 3 February 2016 / Accepted: 31 August 2016 / Published online: 30 September 2016 Ó Swiss Geological Society 2016 Abstract An Early Jurassic sauropod dinosaur tracksite in simultaneously exhibit high heteropody typical for the Lower Jurassic Zhenzhuchong Formation at the Parabrontopodus-type trackways. The relative length of Changhebian site in Dazu County, Sichuan, is known to pes digits I, II and III is difficult to determine, but is sug- have yielded the trackway of a turning sauropod. A re- gestive of a primitive condition where digit I is less well study of the site shows that all in all there are more than developed than in Brontopodus. Thus far, they are the 100 tracks organized in at least three sauropod trackways. stratigraphically oldest sauropod trackways known from The narrow turn in one of the trackways is confirmed and Asia being Hettangian in age. Previously, the trackway analyzed in greater detail. All of the trackways show a with the narrow turn was reported as the first turning wide gauge similar to Brontopodus-type trackways, but sauropod trackway from Asia, but recently several other turning trackways have been reported suggesting that this behaviour is more commonly found than previously Editorial handling: J.-P.
    [Show full text]
  • Completeness of the Dinosaur Fossil Record: Disentangling Geological and Anthropogenic Biases
    COMPLETENESS OF THE DINOSAUR FOSSIL RECORD: DISENTANGLING GEOLOGICAL AND ANTHROPOGENIC BIASES by DANIEL DAVID CASHMORE A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY September 2019 School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract Non-avian dinosaurs were a highly successful clade of terrestrial tetrapods that dominated Mesozoic ecosystems. Their public and scientific popularity makes them one of most intensely researched and understood fossil groups. Key to our understanding of their evolutionary history are interpretations of their changing diversity through geological time. However, spatiotemporal changes in fossil specimen completeness, diagnostic quality, and sampling availabil- ity can bias our understanding of a group’s fossil record. Methods quantifying the level of skeletal and phylogenetic information available for a fossil group have previously been used to assess potential bias. In this thesis, these meth- ods are used to critically assess the saurischian dinosaur fossil record, includ- ing an examination of changes in specimen completeness through research time.
    [Show full text]