DOCSLIB.ORG

The Conduct of Lord Singh of Wimbledon

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Report from the Commissioner for Standards The conduct of Lord Singh of Wimbledon Published 13 January 2021 Commissioner Report 2020–21/9 Code of Conduct for Members, Guide to the Code of Conduct and Code of Conduct for Members’ Staff The present Code of Conduct for Members of the House of Lords was agreed on 30 November 2009. Amendments to it were agreed by the House on 30 March 2010, 12 June 2014, 25 February 2016, 9 February 2017, 3 April 2017, 30 April 2019,18 July 2019, 16 March 2020 and 8 July 2020. The Guide to the Code of Conduct was proposed by the Committee for Privileges (2nd Report, Session 2009–10, HL Paper 81) and agreed by the House on 16 March 2010. The Guide was amended on 9 November 2011, 6 March 2014, 13 May 2014, 24 March 2015, 25 February 2016, 9 February 2017, 3 April 2017, 30 April 2019, 18 July 2019, 16 March 2020 and 8 July 2020. The Code of Conduct for House of Lords Members’ Staff was agreed on 13 May 2014. Amendments to it were agreed on 24 March 2015, 30 April 2019, 18 July 2019, 16 March 2020 and 8 July 2020. Review The Codes and Guide are kept under review by the Conduct Committee. Recommended changes are reported to the House and take effect when agreed by the House. The members of the Conduct Committee are: Baroness Anelay of St Johns Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood Cindy Butts (lay member) Mark Castle (lay member) Andrea Coomber (lay member) Dr Vanessa Davies (lay member) Baroness Donaghy Baroness Hussein-Ece Lord Mance (Chairman) Advice The Registrar of Lords’ Interests advises members of the House and their staff on their obligations under the Codes of Conduct. Address: Registrar of Lords’ Interests, House of Lords, London SW1A 0PW Email: [email protected] Telephone: 020 7219 3112/3120 Registers of Interests A list of interests of members and their staff can be found online: http://www.parliament.uk/hlregister Commissioner for Standards The independent Commissioner for Standards is responsible for considering any alleged breaches of the Codes of Conduct. Address: The Commissioner for Standards, House of Lords, London SW1A 0PW Email: [email protected] Telephone: 020 7219 7152 Website: www.parliament.uk/hl-standards Independent Complaints and Grievance Scheme Helpline 0808 168 9281 (freephone) [email protected] CONTENTS Page Summary 7 Chapter 1: Introduction 9 Chronology and process 9 Relevant aspects of the Code 10 Parliamentary Behaviour Code and definitions of bullying, harassment and sexual misconduct 10 Chapter 2: Principles relating to investigations and outcomes 12 Natural justice and fairness 12 Proportionality 13 Remedial action 13 Sanctions imposed by the House 13 Agreed resolution 14 Openness and transparency 14 Chapter 3: Account of the key facts and evidence 16 Timeline of investigation 16 Preet Kaur Gill MP’s complaint 16 Lord Singh’s response 19 Proposal for mediation 22 APPG for British Sikhs 23 Lord Singh’s engagement with the APPG 24 Ms Kaur Gill as chair of the APPG 24 Lord Singh’s requests for an opportunity to address the APPG 25 Analysis 27 ONS meeting 28 Analysis 29 Sunny Hundal article 30 Analysis 30 Tweets 31 Analysis 33 Network of Sikh Organisations and the Sikh Federation (UK) 33 The Network of Sikh Organisations and Lord Singh 33 The Sikh Federation (UK) and Ms Kaur Gill 34 Analysis 34 Impact of Lord Singh’s conduct on Preet Kaur Gill 35 Chapter 4: Response to draft factual report 38 Lord Singh’s response to the draft factual report 38 Chapter 5: Findings and outcome 39 Is the conduct complained of proven? 39 Does Lord Singh’s behaviour amount to harassment? 40 Was Lord Singh’s conduct unwanted? 40 Was Lord Singh’s conduct related to a relevant protected characteristic? 41 Has Lord Singh’s conduct created an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment for Ms Kaur Gill/the perception of Ms Kaur Gill? 41 The other circumstances of the case 41 Is it reasonable for the conduct to have that effect? 42 Finding 42 Does Lord Singh’s behaviour amount to bullying? 42 2 THE CONDUCT OF LORD SINGH OF WIMBLEDON Finding 43 Conclusion 43 Appendix 1: Factual report 44 Appendix 2: Lord Singh’s response to the draft factual report 99 The Conduct of Lord Singh of Wimbledon SUMMARY In July 2019, Preet Kaur Gill MP made a complaint about the conduct of Lord Singh of Wimbledon. In brief, her complaint was that Lord Singh’s conduct towards her as Chair of the APPG for British Sikhs constituted a breach of the Code of Conduct. She alleged that his behaviour had been rude and bullying. She said that his behaviour towards previous chairs of the APPG, all of whom had been men, had been professional. She therefore considered that his conduct towards her was as a result of her sex, and therefore constituted harassment. Ms Kaur Gill provided various examples to support her complaint. These included articles published by the Network of Sikh Organisations (of which Lord Singh is the Director), a press article on the website barficulture.tv, and a chain of emails between Lord Singh and Ms Kaur Gill’s office. Lord Singh rejected Ms Kaur Gill’s allegations. He considered that Ms Kaur Gill had misused her position as Chair of the APPG to support the Sikh Federation (UK) (an organisation which provides the secretariat to the APPG but whose work Lord Singh objects to) and to promote a policy view with which he fundamentally disagreed. The issue at the heart of their disagreement concerned how Sikhs are recorded on the census for England and Wales. Since 2001, the census has collected data on religious affiliation, for which a specific Sikh “tick box” is included. Ms Kaur Gill, and others, have campaigned that a Sikh “tick box” ought also to be an option available in the section of the census on ethnicity. She considered that the inclusion of a Sikh “tick box” would allow for more accurate data collection about the Sikh community in England and Wales which, in turn, would affect how public funding might be spent to support Sikh-related issues. Lord Singh, and others, object to the inclusion of a Sikh “tick box”. He considered that recording “Sikh” as an ethnicity would be wrong and contrary to the tenets of Sikhism. Following investigation, I concluded that a finding of harassment could not be supported by the evidence. While there was discourteous conduct demonstrated towards Ms Kaur Gill, the evidence did not demonstrate on the balance of probabilities that this could reasonably be ascribed to Ms Kaur Gill’s sex. For example, Ms Kaur Gill noted that one reason for Lord Singh’s approach might be that since her election he was no longer the leading Sikh voice in Parliament. Lord Singh explained that he had treated previous APPG chairs differently as they had not been Sikhs. Once Ms Kaur Gill had been elected, he considered the APPG and its policy positions a matter worth being involved with. Similarly, I concluded that a finding of bullying could not be demonstrated on the balance of probabilities. Essential to a finding of bullying is evidence of a misuse or abuse of power, typically arising out of an imbalance of power between the two parties. In this instance, both Lord Singh and Ms Kaur Gill had a similar level of power: both were parliamentarians (which I consider to the most important factor in this parliamentary context) and both were supported by external organisations (Ms Kaur Gill, the Sikh Federation (UK); Lord Singh, the Network of Sikh Organisations). As a result, I have dismissed Ms Kaur Gill’s complaint. THE CONDUCT OF LORD SINGH OF WIMBLEDON 5 CHaPter 1: INTRODUCTION 1. This report deals with a complaint made about Lord Singh of Wimbledon by Preet Kaur Gill MP under the provisions of the Code dealing with bullying, harassment or sexual misconduct. 2. In considering this complaint I have been supported by Quentin Colborn, Independent Investigator, Andrea Adams Consultancy, and Moriyo Aiyeola and James Whittle, two of the Clerks who assist me in my work. I wish to place on record my thanks to them for all their help, while also acknowledging that I am solely responsible for the conclusions reached and the decisions made in this investigation. 3. By its nature, any report into allegations of bullying, harassment or sexual misconduct will include content that some readers may find upsetting or offensive. My aim is to reflect fairly and fully the evidence I gather in the course of an investigation and not to censor or in any way minimise views expressed or material uncovered. I believe this transparency is essential to helping the House of Lords to be a workplace where everyone is valued and respected, and where it is clear that bullying, harassment and sexual misconduct are not tolerated. This means that reports into allegations of bullying, harassment or sexual misconduct will often make for difficult reading. 4. The findings and discussions in this case relate to bullying, and to harassment associated with the protected characteristic of sex. 5. The report includes language that some readers may find offensive. Chronology and process 6. Following the receipt of Ms Kaur Gill’s complaint I carried out a preliminary investigation to establish if the complaint engaged the Code of Conduct, and concluded that it did so. 7. On 13 September 2019, I informed Lord Singh of the complaint, sent him the details Ms Kaur Gill had provided to me, and asked for his written response.
Recommended publications
  • Ethnic Diversity in Politics and Public Life

    Ethnic Diversity in Politics and Public Life

    BRIEFING PAPER CBP 01156, 22 October 2020 By Elise Uberoi and Ethnic diversity in politics Rebecca Lees and public life Contents: 1. Ethnicity in the United Kingdom 2. Parliament 3. The Government and Cabinet 4. Other elected bodies in the UK 5. Public sector organisations www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 Ethnic diversity in politics and public life Contents Summary 3 1. Ethnicity in the United Kingdom 6 1.1 Categorising ethnicity 6 1.2 The population of the United Kingdom 7 2. Parliament 8 2.1 The House of Commons 8 Since the 1980s 9 Ethnic minority women in the House of Commons 13 2.2 The House of Lords 14 2.3 International comparisons 16 3. The Government and Cabinet 17 4. Other elected bodies in the UK 19 4.1 Devolved legislatures 19 4.2 Local government and the Greater London Authority 19 5. Public sector organisations 21 5.1 Armed forces 21 5.2 Civil Service 23 5.3 National Health Service 24 5.4 Police 26 5.4 Justice 27 5.5 Prison officers 28 5.6 Teachers 29 5.7 Fire and Rescue Service 30 5.8 Social workers 31 5.9 Ministerial and public appointments 33 Annex 1: Standard ethnic classifications used in the UK 34 Cover page image copyright UK Youth Parliament 2015 by UK Parliament. Licensed under CC BY-NC 2.0 / image cropped 3 Commons Library Briefing, 22 October 2020 Summary This report focuses on the proportion of people from ethnic minority backgrounds in a range of public positions across the UK.
  • National Policy Forum (NPF) Report 2018

    National Policy Forum (NPF) Report 2018

    REPORT 2018 @LabPolicyForum #NPFConsultation2018 National Policy Forum Report 2018 XX National Policy Forum Report 2018 Contents NPF Elected Officers ....................................................................................................................4 Foreword ........................................................................................................................................5 About this document ...................................................................................................................6 Policy Commission Annual Reports Early Years, Education and Skills ............................................................................................7 Economy, Business and Trade ............................................................................................. 25 Environment, Energy and Culture ....................................................................................... 39 Health and Social Care ........................................................................................................... 55 Housing, Local Government and Transport ..................................................................... 71 International ............................................................................................................................. 83 Justice and Home Affairs ....................................................................................................... 99 Work, Pensions and Equality ..............................................................................................119

  • June-July 2019

    www.preetkaurgill.com Report back Dear {contact.rst_name} My team and I have been working hard over the past couple of months sending out surveys and delivering letters across the constituency – asking for constituents’ views on a number of local issues, as well as keeping constituents up to date with what I’ve been doing both locally and in Parliament. My ofce receives hundreds of casework emails and calls each month, and May and June were no exception. In the past two months alone, I have taken up over 1,000 cases and sent over 2,500 emails. In addition to casework, I have also received hundreds of emails from constituents on a diverse range of issues, with the most frequently occurring topics relating to the NHS, climate change, and of course, Brexit. In Parliament, I have contributed to a number of debates on a variety of issues such as inequality, school cuts, and mental health. Sadly, the underfunding of mental health services means that those most in need are now suffering most, in particular, our children and young people. You can watch my speech in Parliament where I call on the Government to do more for young people’s mental health here. On school cuts, out of the 371 schools in Birmingham a staggering 365 face cuts with an average loss of £350 per pupil. In Edgbaston, over 82% of the schools who responded to my survey have seen cuts to their budgets this academic year, and 88% feel pessimistic about funding for the next three years. I revealed the extent of local school funding cuts with the Schools Minister in Parliament, which you can watch here.
  • THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim

    THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim

    THE 422 MPs WHO BACKED THE MOTION Conservative 1. Bim Afolami 2. Peter Aldous 3. Edward Argar 4. Victoria Atkins 5. Harriett Baldwin 6. Steve Barclay 7. Henry Bellingham 8. Guto Bebb 9. Richard Benyon 10. Paul Beresford 11. Peter Bottomley 12. Andrew Bowie 13. Karen Bradley 14. Steve Brine 15. James Brokenshire 16. Robert Buckland 17. Alex Burghart 18. Alistair Burt 19. Alun Cairns 20. James Cartlidge 21. Alex Chalk 22. Jo Churchill 23. Greg Clark 24. Colin Clark 25. Ken Clarke 26. James Cleverly 27. Thérèse Coffey 28. Alberto Costa 29. Glyn Davies 30. Jonathan Djanogly 31. Leo Docherty 32. Oliver Dowden 33. David Duguid 34. Alan Duncan 35. Philip Dunne 36. Michael Ellis 37. Tobias Ellwood 38. Mark Field 39. Vicky Ford 40. Kevin Foster 41. Lucy Frazer 42. George Freeman 43. Mike Freer 44. Mark Garnier 45. David Gauke 46. Nick Gibb 47. John Glen 48. Robert Goodwill 49. Michael Gove 50. Luke Graham 51. Richard Graham 52. Bill Grant 53. Helen Grant 54. Damian Green 55. Justine Greening 56. Dominic Grieve 57. Sam Gyimah 58. Kirstene Hair 59. Luke Hall 60. Philip Hammond 61. Stephen Hammond 62. Matt Hancock 63. Richard Harrington 64. Simon Hart 65. Oliver Heald 66. Peter Heaton-Jones 67. Damian Hinds 68. Simon Hoare 69. George Hollingbery 70. Kevin Hollinrake 71. Nigel Huddleston 72. Jeremy Hunt 73. Nick Hurd 74. Alister Jack (Teller) 75. Margot James 76. Sajid Javid 77. Robert Jenrick 78. Jo Johnson 79. Andrew Jones 80. Gillian Keegan 81. Seema Kennedy 82. Stephen Kerr 83. Mark Lancaster 84.
  • Download 2019-20 Annual Report

    Download 2019-20 Annual Report

    Sikh Federation (UK) Never flinch from performing righteous deeds ANNUAL REPORT 2020 WORKING FOR TRUTH, JUSTICE & FREEDOM OVERVIEW A message from the Chairman In the last 6 months major restric�ons have been imposed on our daily lives by the COVID-19 pandemic. The extraordinary response to the unprecedented public health crisis has changed the way we interact with each other whether that be in families, at work and as a community. For Sikhs the concept of Sangat, as opposed to isolated religious prac�ce, is essen�al for our spiritual and moral well-being. For many Sikhs it is only when we are part of the Sangat that we are able to carry out much of our seva. Global poli�cs are now dominated by the pandemic, which has resulted in unparalleled expansion of government power. Restric�ons and the public health crisis will remain un�l an effec�ve vaccine is available. Most commentators predict we are anything from 6-12 months away from a safe and effec�ve vaccine. The full economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic are s�ll unfolding but all governments are expected to struggle for many years with some struggling more than others. The Brexit referendum in 2016 triggered a process of polarisa�on in society that cut across the tradi�onal Bri�sh poli�cal party landscape. Brexit for many years, dominated UK na�onal poli�cs and was the major issue during the December 2019 General Elec�on that returned a Conserva�ve government with a large majority. The Covid-19 pandemic and its a�ermath however has the poten�al to be a poli�cal game-changer in the UK that could completely reshape the Bri�sh poli�cal landscape.
  • Challenging Hateful Extremism

    Challenging Hateful Extremism

    Challenging Hateful Extremism October 2019 Our Vision for Challenging Hateful Extremism Our vision is one where together we uphold our democratic way of life in a peaceful, plural and inclusive society that opposes intolerance; where people exercise individual liberty and take personal responsibility for promoting equal citizenship, recognising the harm extremist behaviours cause to everyone; and where our communities and institutions robustly challenge and resist hateful extremism and support those affected by it. Commission for Countering Extremism Foreword Hateful extremism demands a response. reviewed the Strategy and its delivery it is my From inspiring terrorist attacks, to hateful view that the current response is insufficient extremist groups engaging in persistent and too broad. hostility, we are grappling with what is a global challenge. If we are to be successful in reducing the extremist threat in our country, we must However, extremism, and how we counter it, focus on challenging hateful extremism. is a complex and contested policy area. The My report shows the destructive effect debate is often polarised and abusive; not hateful extremism is having on the lives helped by the overuse of the E-word. This of individuals, our communities and is particularly evident in these politically wider society. febrile times. Counter extremism policy over the years This climate makes serious discussions has also been characterised by a top-down about extremism challenging. And yet it is approach. The voices of the wider public, vital that we have those discussions. victims and counter extremism practitioners have been missing. That is why I have I have worked in the field of counter invested in extensive engagement, meeting extremism for over ten years.
  • Mobilizing in Different Political Opportunity Structures: the Cases of French and British Muslims

    Mobilizing in Different Political Opportunity Structures: the Cases of French and British Muslims

    ASPJ Africa & Francophonie - 1st Quarter 2012 Mobilizing in Different Political Opportunity Structures The Cases of French and British Muslims IMÈNE AJALA, PHD* ssues related to Islam in the European sphere have increasingly been at the forefront of public spaces and part of decision makers’ agendas. According to the European Union (EU) Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia, the EU includes at least 13 million Muslims, repre- senting 5 percent of Europeans.1 For Jocelyne Césari, “Muslim immigra- tionI to Europe and North America can be seen as the foundational moment for a new transcultural space—a space where individuals live and experience different cultural references and values that are now disconnected from national contexts and boundaries.”2 Such a transcultural space is characterized by the forceful emergence of a transnational religion (Islam) in a secularized public space (Europe).3 This situation necessarily leads to tensions; that is, Eu- ropean Muslims experience difficult relations with their respective govern- ments.4 The context of the “war on terror” since the attacks of 11 Sep- tember 2001 (9/11) and the security implied have drawn additional attention to Muslims and their claims-making in terms of economic, political, and religious rights in European countries. Muslims’ integration is considered a challenge constructed as a confrontation between religious discourses and secular spaces. Of course, national differences have different effects in terms of the conceptualization of multiculturalism, and one can distinguish among them by different “philosophies of integration.”5 * The author holds a BA in political science from the Grenoble Institute of Political Studies, Grenoble, France, as well as an MA and a PhD in international relations from the Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva, Switzerland.

  • Members of the House of Commons December 2019 Diane ABBOTT MP

    Members of the House of Commons December 2019 A Labour Conservative Diane ABBOTT MP Adam AFRIYIE MP Hackney North and Stoke Windsor Newington Labour Conservative Debbie ABRAHAMS MP Imran AHMAD-KHAN Oldham East and MP Saddleworth Wakefield Conservative Conservative Nigel ADAMS MP Nickie AIKEN MP Selby and Ainsty Cities of London and Westminster Conservative Conservative Bim AFOLAMI MP Peter ALDOUS MP Hitchin and Harpenden Waveney A Labour Labour Rushanara ALI MP Mike AMESBURY MP Bethnal Green and Bow Weaver Vale Labour Conservative Tahir ALI MP Sir David AMESS MP Birmingham, Hall Green Southend West Conservative Labour Lucy ALLAN MP Fleur ANDERSON MP Telford Putney Labour Conservative Dr Rosena ALLIN-KHAN Lee ANDERSON MP MP Ashfield Tooting Members of the House of Commons December 2019 A Conservative Conservative Stuart ANDERSON MP Edward ARGAR MP Wolverhampton South Charnwood West Conservative Labour Stuart ANDREW MP Jonathan ASHWORTH Pudsey MP Leicester South Conservative Conservative Caroline ANSELL MP Sarah ATHERTON MP Eastbourne Wrexham Labour Conservative Tonia ANTONIAZZI MP Victoria ATKINS MP Gower Louth and Horncastle B Conservative Conservative Gareth BACON MP Siobhan BAILLIE MP Orpington Stroud Conservative Conservative Richard BACON MP Duncan BAKER MP South Norfolk North Norfolk Conservative Conservative Kemi BADENOCH MP Steve BAKER MP Saffron Walden Wycombe Conservative Conservative Shaun BAILEY MP Harriett BALDWIN MP West Bromwich West West Worcestershire Members of the House of Commons December 2019 B Conservative Conservative
  • Call List for Mon 12 Jul 2021

    Call List for Mon 12 Jul 2021

    Issued on: 12 July at 11.12am Call lists for Westminster Hall Monday 12 July 2021 A list of Members, both virtually and physically present, selected to participate in Westminster Hall debates. All Members wishing to speak in the debate must be present from the beginning of the debate. For 30-minute debates, debates are led by the Member in charge and responded to by the Minister. Members may attend to intervene or make a short speech. Members wishing to make a speech should follow existing conventions about contacting the Member in charge of the debate, the Speaker’s Office ([email protected]) and the Minister. If sittings are suspended for divisions in the House, additional time is added. Call lists are compiled and published incrementally as information becomes available. For the most up-to-date information see the parliament website: https://commonsbusiness.parliament.uk/ CONTENTS 1. e-petition 564582, relating to research into motor neurone disease 1 2. e-petition 576563, relating to water safety 2 E-PETITION 564582, RELATING TO RESEARCH INTO MOTOR NEURONE DISEASE 4.30pm to 6.00pm Order Member Party Virtual/ Physical 1 Martyn Day (Linlithgow and East SNP Virtual Member in Charge Falkirk) 2 John Lamont (Berwickshire, Conservative Physical Roxburgh and Selkirk) 3 Tony Lloyd (Rochdale) Labour Virtual 4 Andrew Lewer (Northampton Conservative Virtual South) 2 Call lists for Westminster Hall Monday 12 July 2021 Order Member Party Virtual/ Physical 5 Barbara Keeley (Worsley and Eccles Labour Virtual South) 6 Mr Steve Baker (Wycombe)
  • For a Tolerant World Where Rational Thinking and Kindness Prevail Welcome

    For a Tolerant World Where Rational Thinking and Kindness Prevail Welcome

    Northumbria Students Union 2 Sandyford Ford, Newcastle NE1 8SB 22-24 June 2018 Newcastle FOR A TOLERANT WORLD WHERE RATIONAL THINKING AND KINDNESS PREVAIL WELCOME Welcome to Humanists UK probed some of the bigger Convention 2018, in the questions about human nature stunning city of Newcastle. We and morality. hope, over this weekend, to be inspired and entertained as One of the most striking we bring together hundreds features of Northumbrian of like-minded people to think, humanism has been its laugh, eat, and discuss ideas outward-looking nature, under one roof. We’re all here exemplifying Harold because we are humanists: Blackham’s maxim that people who shape their own ‘Humanism is about the lives in the here and now. And world, not about humanism.’ as the national organisation The North East Humanists, a for humanists in the UK, it’s partner group of Humanists Humanists UK’s mission to UK originally founded in 1957, in. And you’ll have a chance champion ideas for the one is a great example of this. to ask questions of some of life we have. This weekend The group has been a great the foremost activists working we’ll dive deep into some of supporter of the Isaac Newton to build a fairer, more rational those ideas – and we hope High School in Uganda for society in the UK and around you’ll find the talks, debates, many years now, helping the the world. and entertainment we’ve Ugandan humanists ensure put on both stimulating and that a broad-based, liberal Whether this is your first ever rewarding.
  • Oakervee Review

    Oakervee Review

    1 Contents 1. Chair’s Foreword............................................................................................3 2. Introducton....................................................................................................5 3. Executve summary......................................................................................11 4. What is HS2..................................................................................................19 5. Review of the objectves for HS2.................................................................24 . The HS2 design and route............................................................................41 7. Cost and schedule........................................................................................55 8. Contractng and HS2 specifcatons..............................................................66 9. HS2 statons..................................................................................................72 10. Capability, governance and oversight.......................................................80 11. Economic assessment of HS2....................................................................93 12. Alternatve Optons.................................................................................107 Annex A: Glossary.............................................................................................116 Annex B: Terms of Reference...........................................................................121 Annex C: Meetngs and Evidence.....................................................................125
  • Labour Party General Election 2017 Report Labour Party General Election 2017 Report

    Labour Party General Election 2017 Report Labour Party General Election 2017 Report

    FOR THE MANY NOT THE FEW LABOUR PARTY GENERAL ELECTION 2017 REPORT LABOUR PARTY GENERAL ELECTION 2017 REPORT Page 7 Contents 1. Introduction from Jeremy Corbyn 07 2. General Election 2017: Results 11 3. General Election 2017: Labour’s message and campaign strategy 15 3.1 Campaign Strategy and Key Messages 16 3.2 Supporting the Ground Campaign 20 3.3 Campaigning with Women 21 3.4 Campaigning with Faith, Ethnic Minority Communities 22 3.5 Campaigning with Youth, First-time Voters and Students 23 3.6 Campaigning with Trade Unions and Affiliates 25 4. General Election 2017: the campaign 27 4.1 Manifesto and campaign documents 28 4.2 Leader’s Tour 30 4.3 Deputy Leader’s Tour 32 4.4 Party Election Broadcasts 34 4.5 Briefing and Information 36 4.6 Responding to Our Opponents 38 4.7 Press and Broadcasting 40 4.8 Digital 43 4.9 New Campaign Technology 46 4.10 Development and Fundraising 48 4.11 Nations and Regions Overview 49 4.12 Scotland 50 4.13 Wales 52 4.14 Regional Directors Reports 54 4.15 Events 64 4.16 Key Campaigners Unit 65 4.17 Endorsers 67 4.18 Constitutional and Legal services 68 5. Labour candidates 69 General Election 2017 Report Page 9 1. INTRODUCTION 2017 General Election Report Page 10 1. INTRODUCTION Foreword I’d like to thank all the candidates, party members, trade unions and supporters who worked so hard to achieve the result we did. The Conservatives called the snap election in order to increase their mandate.