Challenging Hateful Extremism

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Challenging Hateful Extremism Challenging Hateful Extremism October 2019 Our Vision for Challenging Hateful Extremism Our vision is one where together we uphold our democratic way of life in a peaceful, plural and inclusive society that opposes intolerance; where people exercise individual liberty and take personal responsibility for promoting equal citizenship, recognising the harm extremist behaviours cause to everyone; and where our communities and institutions robustly challenge and resist hateful extremism and support those affected by it. Commission for Countering Extremism Foreword Hateful extremism demands a response. reviewed the Strategy and its delivery it is my From inspiring terrorist attacks, to hateful view that the current response is insufficient extremist groups engaging in persistent and too broad. hostility, we are grappling with what is a global challenge. If we are to be successful in reducing the extremist threat in our country, we must However, extremism, and how we counter it, focus on challenging hateful extremism. is a complex and contested policy area. The My report shows the destructive effect debate is often polarised and abusive; not hateful extremism is having on the lives helped by the overuse of the E-word. This of individuals, our communities and is particularly evident in these politically wider society. febrile times. Counter extremism policy over the years This climate makes serious discussions has also been characterised by a top-down about extremism challenging. And yet it is approach. The voices of the wider public, vital that we have those discussions. victims and counter extremism practitioners have been missing. That is why I have I have worked in the field of counter invested in extensive engagement, meeting extremism for over ten years. I know what it’s thousands of people across England and like to challenge extremism. It’s demanding Wales. It is clear that victims of extremism work and there’s little support. I also have not been acknowledged or protected know how it feels to be a victim, targeted and continue to be targeted by extremists. by extremists. Counter-extremists experience frightening When I took on the role as Lead levels of hostility alongside a lack of support Commissioner, I was acutely aware that and funding. Social division caused by hateful we lack the clarity, the language and extremists is fracturing our communities. the consensus to effectively counter this What I heard was informative, shocking and harmful phenomenon. worrying. Some of the stories have left me Our country has a robust response in place to heartbroken. People, young and old, have counter terrorism. In 2015 the Government cried as they described how extremists recognised the need to counter extremism targeted them because of their sexuality, outside of terrorism and launched the their gender, their race or religious identity. first Counter Extremism Strategy. Having Taking a victim centred approach is essential in any counter extremism strategy. 1 Commission for Countering Extremism We must not allow extremists to normalise I want to see a strengthened Commission for their hatred in our country. Countering Extremism to help defend our plural, tolerant and broad-minded society. There is a fear that countering extremism can undermine civil liberties and in particular, My Commission has begun the job of freedom of expression. As a human rights examining the existence of hateful extremism campaigner I recognise these concerns. and the negative consequences to our society. Authoritarian regimes have used ‘counter terrorism’ and ‘counter extremism’ to silence We will continue to drive the whole society dissent and criticism. response we need. We need to conduct more research, to gather more evidence about the There is no doubt in my mind: we must impact on victims and to develop evidence- continue to protect and preserve freedom of based interventions. expression. This includes offensive, critical and shocking speech. But above all, we need brave, bold and consistent leadership both within In this report I propose a new approach to Government and across civil society. counter extremism. A rights-based and proportionate response to ensure that checks I would like to thank the many people who and balances are in place when countering have contributed their experience, their extremism. evidence and their wisdom to this work. But extremism itself is a human rights I am particularly grateful to my Expert Group issue – this isn’t acknowledged enough. for the independent challenge and advice Hateful extremists seek to restrict individual they provided as I delivered this work and liberties and curtail the fundamental prepared this report. freedoms that define our country. Time and Together, we must build a whole society again I have seen how extremist activity has response to help those who are vulnerable contributed to a climate of censorship and to extremism while challenging those fear, limiting freedom of expression, freedom who actively seek to divide and undermine of religion or belief and undermining the our country. universality and indivisibility of human rights. Our country has a long tradition of championing rights; from Magna Carta in 1215 to the adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Human Rights Act 1998. Hateful extremism stands in stark contrast to the rights and freedoms that we enjoy. Sara Khan Lead Commissioner It is precisely for this reason I have spent so much of my life challenging extremism and will continue to do so as Lead Commissioner. 2 Commission for Countering Extremism 3 Commission for Countering Extremism EXTREMISM IN ENGLAND AND WALES 73% of people are concerned 2018 about rising saw the biggest Far Right marches extremism in a generation. 52% 75% 59% of the respondents to a Three Of the public respondents first-of-its kind call for who said they had evidence have witnessed quarters witnessed extremism, extremism in some way. Islamist extremism (59%) of the public was the most common. respondents find the 56% of the public and Government's 73% of practitioners Over agreed that “a lot more” current should be done to counter 3/4 extremism online. definition of extremism of those countering extremism face some "very unhelpful" degree of abuse for the Prosecutions for inciting work they do. hatred are as high as or "unhelpful" they have ever been since statistics first began in 2010. Recorded religious When asked who has a role to play, practitioner hate crime has increased respondents’ top choice was social media; over twice as fast as other forms since 2015. tech companies and the public respondents chose faith groups and leaders. 4 Commission for Countering Extremism Executive Summary Hateful extremism threatens our ability to Drawing on this wide range of evidence and live well together. From inspiring violence to having reviewed the Government’s Counter- the incitement of active hatred and hostility Extremism Strategy and definition of 2015, targeted at those perceived to be a threat this report proposes a bold new approach to their world-view, hateful extremists are focussed on hateful extremism. We need having a devastating impact on victims and to develop a set of diverse yet robust and threatening the social fabric of our country. proportionate responses to it. Extremism requires an urgent and effective At the same time, protecting democratic response. Our country’s response to violent debate and freedom of expression is vital. extremism and terrorism is robust and This includes defending speech and actions effective. However violent extremism requires which can be offensive, shocking, dissenting a different strategy to hateful extremism. Our and critical; or advocates for conservative evidence shows that a significant gap exists in religious beliefs. This is why we are taking a our response to hateful extremism. rights-based approach to challenging hateful extremism. Our ability to counter extremism outside of terrorism has been hampered by a lack of Describing Hateful Extremism consensus: on what we mean by extremism, on what our response should look like and The experiences of the public, victims and on what role Government and civil society front-line counter extremists have often should play. been missing from the debate; yet it is their voices which are vital in shaping counter Launched last year, the Commission has held extremism policy. We heard moving stories the most extensive national conversation from victims and from all kinds of people and on extremism. places about the serious and long-lasting The Commission has met thousands of harms of extremism. We have identified these people including those critical of counter harms for the first time, which will enable extremism (CE). We received nearly further research. 3,000 submissions to our first ever public Many people are affected – over half of consultation, visited over 20 towns and cities, respondents to our public consultation had held 16 roundtables, reviewed hundreds witnessed extremism, with one in five having of pages of Government documents and witnessed it in their local area. Extremism commissioned 19 academic papers. is not confined to a single race, religion or ideology. Concerns were raised about the growing threat of the Far Right, Far 5 Commission for Countering Extremism Left, Islamist and other forms of religious What Does Hateful fundamentalisms; and animal rights extremism. Extremism Look Like? Hateful, hostile and supremacist beliefs are The concerns people told us about that are increasingly visible in our country today. The harmful and lie outside democratic debate Far Right’s narratives of a racial or cultural fall into three categories: terrorism and threat to “natives” from “aliens” have been violent extremism, hateful extremism and the making their way into the mainstream. As restriction of rights and freedoms. are Islamists’ ideas for defending a single It is our view that across this spectrum, communal Muslim identity against the countering hateful extremism requires the West’s corrupting influence. And the Far greatest attention and focus if we are to be Left’s conflation of anti-imperialism and successful in reducing the extremist threat.
Recommended publications
  • The Conduct of Lord Singh of Wimbledon
    Report from the Commissioner for Standards The conduct of Lord Singh of Wimbledon Published 13 January 2021 Commissioner Report 2020–21/9 Code of Conduct for Members, Guide to the Code of Conduct and Code of Conduct for Members’ Staff The present Code of Conduct for Members of the House of Lords was agreed on 30 November 2009. Amendments to it were agreed by the House on 30 March 2010, 12 June 2014, 25 February 2016, 9 February 2017, 3 April 2017, 30 April 2019,18 July 2019, 16 March 2020 and 8 July 2020. The Guide to the Code of Conduct was proposed by the Committee for Privileges (2nd Report, Session 2009–10, HL Paper 81) and agreed by the House on 16 March 2010. The Guide was amended on 9 November 2011, 6 March 2014, 13 May 2014, 24 March 2015, 25 February 2016, 9 February 2017, 3 April 2017, 30 April 2019, 18 July 2019, 16 March 2020 and 8 July 2020. The Code of Conduct for House of Lords Members’ Staff was agreed on 13 May 2014. Amendments to it were agreed on 24 March 2015, 30 April 2019, 18 July 2019, 16 March 2020 and 8 July 2020. Review The Codes and Guide are kept under review by the Conduct Committee. Recommended changes are reported to the House and take effect when agreed by the House. The members of the Conduct Committee are: Baroness Anelay of St Johns Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood Cindy Butts (lay member) Mark Castle (lay member) Andrea Coomber (lay member) Dr Vanessa Davies (lay member) Baroness Donaghy Baroness Hussein-Ece Lord Mance (Chairman) Advice The Registrar of Lords’ Interests advises members of the House and their staff on their obligations under the Codes of Conduct.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Racism Educational Pack
    Anti-Racism Educational Pack www.theredcard.org Compiled by: Kate Hollinshead Written by: Kate Hollinshead, Sarah Soyei, Lizz Bennett, Laura Pidcock, Simon Richards, Jo Wallis. Special thanks go to: Amnesty International, Christopher Bloore, Catch22, ChildLine, Patti DeRosa, Chris Derrington (University of Northampton), Echo Research Company, GLSEN, Paul Kearns, Dee Kinning, Berenice Miles, NASUWT, Luke Scanlon (guardian.co.uk), Chris Stokes, TNS Media, Tony Waddle, Michael Wood (BBC). Major Sponsors 2 ANTI-RACISM EDUCATION PACK This education pack has been developed collaboratively with help and support from many organisations and individuals. Show Racism the Red Card would like to thank everyone for their valuable contributions. CONTENTS Introduction to Racism 07 Where does Racism come from?: Exploring Stereotypes and the Influence of the Media 12 The History of Racism 19 Experiences of Racism 25 Dealing with and Campaigning against Racism 32 Celebrating Diversity 40 Key: This icon illustrates the relevant parts of the DVD which support and enhance delivery of the activities within each section. Look out for the speech bubble to find relevant discussion points. This pack is filled with a range of engaging activities, indicated by this icon. 3 ANTI-RACISM EDUCATION PACK FILM USER GUIDE – HOW DO I USE THIS RESOURCE? This 22 minute film is an excellent introduction to the subject About this education pack… of racism. With recognisable sporting personalities, such as Thierry Henry, Ryan Giggs, Florent Malouda and Leon Best, This resource has been designed to help educators as well as personal accounts of racism from young people, effectively challenge racism and promote equality amongst young people, across formal and informal educational this film is a fantastic and engaging way to begin talking settings.
    [Show full text]
  • View Early Day Motions PDF File 0.08 MB
    Published: Tuesday 20 July 2021 Early Day Motions tabled on Monday 19 July 2021 Early Day Motions (EDMs) are motions for which no days have been fixed. The number of signatories includes all members who have added their names in support of the Early Day Motion (EDM), including the Member in charge of the Motion. EDMs and added names are also published on the EDM database at www.parliament.uk/edm [R] Indicates that a relevant interest has been declared. New EDMs 330 Negotiating a peace settlement on the Korean Peninsula Tabled: 19/07/21 Signatories: 1 Ed Davey That this House notes the work by Congressman Brad Sherman to encourage new efforts towards formally ending the state of war on the Korean Peninsula through his Peace on the Korean Peninsula Act that was recently introduced in the US House of Representatives; recognises that that symbolic move could play a vital role in the next stage of reducing tensions on that peninsula; further notes that the Korean War hostilities were ended by an armistice in 1953, and that no formal peace treaty has been negotiated since that armistice; reiterates support for the 2018 Panmunjom Declaration in which the governments of North Korea and South Korea declared their intention to work towards negotiating a peace treaty to formally end the Korean War; acknowledges the role the UK Government has played in multilateral efforts to facilitate peace and denuclearisation on that peninsula; and calls on the UK Government to actively engage with all relevant parties and the wider international community to accelerate those efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • Mobilizing in Different Political Opportunity Structures: the Cases of French and British Muslims
    ASPJ Africa & Francophonie - 1st Quarter 2012 Mobilizing in Different Political Opportunity Structures The Cases of French and British Muslims IMÈNE AJALA, PHD* ssues related to Islam in the European sphere have increasingly been at the forefront of public spaces and part of decision makers’ agendas. According to the European Union (EU) Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia, the EU includes at least 13 million Muslims, repre- senting 5 percent of Europeans.1 For Jocelyne Césari, “Muslim immigra- tionI to Europe and North America can be seen as the foundational moment for a new transcultural space—a space where individuals live and experience different cultural references and values that are now disconnected from national contexts and boundaries.”2 Such a transcultural space is characterized by the forceful emergence of a transnational religion (Islam) in a secularized public space (Europe).3 This situation necessarily leads to tensions; that is, Eu- ropean Muslims experience difficult relations with their respective govern- ments.4 The context of the “war on terror” since the attacks of 11 Sep- tember 2001 (9/11) and the security implied have drawn additional attention to Muslims and their claims-making in terms of economic, political, and religious rights in European countries. Muslims’ integration is considered a challenge constructed as a confrontation between religious discourses and secular spaces. Of course, national differences have different effects in terms of the conceptualization of multiculturalism, and one can distinguish among them by different “philosophies of integration.”5 * The author holds a BA in political science from the Grenoble Institute of Political Studies, Grenoble, France, as well as an MA and a PhD in international relations from the Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva, Switzerland.
    [Show full text]
  • Orange Alba: the Civil Religion of Loyalism in the Southwestern Lowlands of Scotland Since 1798
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 8-2010 Orange Alba: The Civil Religion of Loyalism in the Southwestern Lowlands of Scotland since 1798 Ronnie Michael Booker Jr. University of Tennessee - Knoxville, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Part of the European History Commons Recommended Citation Booker, Ronnie Michael Jr., "Orange Alba: The Civil Religion of Loyalism in the Southwestern Lowlands of Scotland since 1798. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2010. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/777 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Ronnie Michael Booker Jr. entitled "Orange Alba: The Civil Religion of Loyalism in the Southwestern Lowlands of Scotland since 1798." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in History. John Bohstedt, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: Vejas Liulevicius, Lynn Sacco, Daniel Magilow Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by R.
    [Show full text]
  • Violent Protest and Heterogeneous Diffusion
    BRITAIN FIRST AND THE UK INDEPENDENCE PARTY: SOCIAL MEDIA AND MOVEMENT-PARTY DYNAMICS1 Thomas Davidson and Mabel Berezin2 FORTHCOMING IN DECEMBER 2018 ISSUE OF MOBILIZATION. PLEASE CITE THE PUBLISHED VERSION. Social movement scholars have recently turned their attention to the interactions between political parties and social movements, but little is known about how social media have impacted these relationships, despite widespread adoption of these technologies. We present a case study of the relationship between Britain First, a far-right anti-Muslim social movement, and the U.K. Independence Party, the Eurosceptic political party that spearheaded the Brexit campaign. The movement appeared marginal in the press but it dominated social media, using this presence to support to the party. We examine the dynamics of the relationship between these groups from 2013 until 2017, drawing upon data from social media, newspapers, and other online sources, and focusing on interactions between elites and rank-and-file supporters. Our findings illustrate how far-right groups have used new technologies to generate an unprecedented amount of popular support and to attempt to influence the political mainstream. A number of western democracies have recently experienced a resurgence of right-wing political activity in both the parliamentary and extra-parliamentary sphere (Akkerman, de Lange, and Rooduijn 2016; Mudde 2016; Muis and Immerzeel 2017). In Germany, the unprecedented electoral performance of the anti-immigrant Alternative for Germany (AfD) party
    [Show full text]
  • For a Tolerant World Where Rational Thinking and Kindness Prevail Welcome
    Northumbria Students Union 2 Sandyford Ford, Newcastle NE1 8SB 22-24 June 2018 Newcastle FOR A TOLERANT WORLD WHERE RATIONAL THINKING AND KINDNESS PREVAIL WELCOME Welcome to Humanists UK probed some of the bigger Convention 2018, in the questions about human nature stunning city of Newcastle. We and morality. hope, over this weekend, to be inspired and entertained as One of the most striking we bring together hundreds features of Northumbrian of like-minded people to think, humanism has been its laugh, eat, and discuss ideas outward-looking nature, under one roof. We’re all here exemplifying Harold because we are humanists: Blackham’s maxim that people who shape their own ‘Humanism is about the lives in the here and now. And world, not about humanism.’ as the national organisation The North East Humanists, a for humanists in the UK, it’s partner group of Humanists Humanists UK’s mission to UK originally founded in 1957, in. And you’ll have a chance champion ideas for the one is a great example of this. to ask questions of some of life we have. This weekend The group has been a great the foremost activists working we’ll dive deep into some of supporter of the Isaac Newton to build a fairer, more rational those ideas – and we hope High School in Uganda for society in the UK and around you’ll find the talks, debates, many years now, helping the the world. and entertainment we’ve Ugandan humanists ensure put on both stimulating and that a broad-based, liberal Whether this is your first ever rewarding.
    [Show full text]
  • Whole Day Download the Hansard Record of the Entire Day in PDF Format. PDF File, 1.03
    Thursday Volume 629 12 October 2017 No. 32 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Thursday 12 October 2017 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2017 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 423 12 OCTOBER 2017 424 Tony Lloyd (Rochdale) (Lab): Does the International House of Commons Trade Secretary recognise that people fear that in the event of, for example, a very right-wing, ideological Government, we could see the erosion of social standards Thursday 12 October 2017 through our trade agreements or even the erosion of our ability to protect our national health service with The House met at half-past Nine o’clock the wrong type of trade treaty? Will he guarantee parliamentary scrutiny of every trade deal done? PRAYERS Dr Fox: I would like the Government to be judged by their actions. Therefore, as I indicated to the hon. Member for Coventry South (Mr Cunningham), as we [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] want to transition the already agreed EU free trade agreements into UK law—which will include, for example, workers’ rights and environmental standards—I hope that we will get the full support of the Opposition in Oral Answers to Questions doing that and in getting the legislation available to give us the powers to do so. Mr Mark Prisk (Hertford and Stortford) (Con): The INTERNATIONAL TRADE White Paper sets out a strong case for free trade: it is good for growth, and it is good for jobs—but occasionally other countries will act in unfair ways, such as through The Secretary of State was asked— the dumping of goods.
    [Show full text]
  • CHARTIST for Democratic Socialism #298 May/June 2019 £2
    #298 workingreal_01 cover 29/04/2019 05:25 Page 1 CHARTIST For democratic socialism #298 May/June 2019 £2 Fighting for a European future Peter Kenyon, Catherine West MP Labour & Brexit Julie Ward European elections Paul Nowak Tory work myths Unmesh Desai Fighting far right Alice Arkwright Knife crime Glyn Ford & Patrick Costello Building Euro solidarity plus Book & Film reviews ISSN - 0968 7866 ISSUE 98 www.chartist.org.uk #298 workingreal_01 cover 29/04/2019 05:25 Page 2 Contributions and letters deadline for Editorial Policy CHARTIST #299 The editorial policy of CHARTIST is to promote debate amongst people active in 08 June 2019 radical politics about the contemporary Chartist welcomes articles of 800 or 1500 words, and relevance of democratic socialism across letters in electronic format only to: [email protected] the spectrum of politics, economics, science, philosophy, art, interpersonal Receive Chartist’s online newsletter: send your email address to [email protected] relations – in short, the whole realm of social life. Chartist Advert Rates: Our concern is with both democracy and socialism. The history of the last century Inside Full page £200; 1/2 page £125; 1/4 page £75; 1/8 page £40; 1/16 page £25; small box 5x2cm £15 single has made it abundantly clear that the sheet insert £50 mass of the population of the advanced We are also interested in advert swaps with other publications. To place an advert, please email: capitalist countries will have no interest [email protected] in any form of socialism which is not thoroughly democratic in its principles, its practices, its morality and its ideals.
    [Show full text]
  • INDIA'scontemporary Security Challenges
    Contemporary Security INDIA’S Challenges Edited by Michael Kugelman INDIa’s Contemporary SECURITY CHALLENGES Essays by: Bethany Danyluk Michael Kugelman Dinshaw Mistry Arun Prakash P.V. Ramana Siddharth Srivastava Nandini Sundar Andrew C. Winner Edited by: Michael Kugelman ©2011 Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington, D.C. www.wilsoncenter.org Available from : Asia Program Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars One Woodrow Wilson Plaza 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20004-3027 www.wilsoncenter.org ISBN 1-933549-79-3 The Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, es- tablished by Congress in 1968 and headquartered in Washington, D.C., is a living national memorial to President Wilson. The Center’s mis- sion is to commemorate the ideals and concerns of Woodrow Wilson by providing a link between the worlds of ideas and policy, while fostering research, study, discussion, and collaboration among a broad spectrum of individuals concerned with policy and scholarship in national and international affairs. Supported by public and private funds, the Center is a nonpartisan institution engaged in the study of national and world affairs. It establishes and maintains a neutral forum for free, open, and informed dialogue. Conclusions or opinions expressed in Center publi- cations and programs are those of the authors and speakers and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Center staff, fellows, trustees, advi- sory groups, or any individuals or organizations that provide financial support to the Center. The Center is the publisher of The Wilson Quarterly and home of Woodrow Wilson Center Press, dialogue radio and television, and the monthly news-letter “Centerpoint.” For more information about the Center’s activities and publications, please visit us on the web at www.wilsoncenter.org.
    [Show full text]
  • Religious Right
    Is there a ‘Religious Right’ Emerging in Britain? Is there a ‘Religious Right’ Emerging in Britian? Andy Walton in Britian? Andy Emerging Right’ ‘Religious a Is there Recent years have seen an increasing number of This report gives a reliable overview of evidence claims that a US-style Religious Right either exists or concerning the purported rise of the Christian is rapidly emerging in Britain. This report examines Right in Britian. Drawing on new research, it profiles Is there a ‘Religious Right’ whether or not the claims are accurate. several new Christian groups. By placing them in context, it shows why rumours that an American- Superficially, it argues, the case looks quite strong: style movement is crossing the Atlantic are greatly there is evidence of greater co-ordination among exaggerated. Christian groups with a strong socially-conservative Emerging in Britain? commitment, in particular relating to human Linda Woodhead, Professor of Sociology of sexuality, marriage, family life, and religious freedom, Religion, Lancaster University about which they are vocal and often willing to resort to legal action. This is a familiar picture within US This is a measured and thoughtful piece of research, politics. contributing to a topic where there is too much heat Andy Walton and too little light in contemporary debate. It assesses However, on closer inspection, research and analysis the presence – or, rather, the current absence – of a suggest that it is highly misleading to describe this coherent ‘Religious Right’ in British politics through with phenomenon as a US-style Religious Right. For a a detailed comparison with the characteristics of the number of reasons – economic, social, ecclesiastical movement in the US.
    [Show full text]
  • A Bill of Rights for the UK?
    House of Lords House of Commons Joint Committee on Human Rights A Bill of Rights for the UK? Twenty–ninth Report of Session 2007–08 Report, together with formal minutes Ordered by The House of Lords to be printed 21 July 2008 Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 21 July 2008 HL Paper 165-I HC 150-I Published on 10 August 2008 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 Joint Committee on Human Rights The Joint Committee on Human Rights is appointed by the House of Lords and the House of Commons to consider matters relating to human rights in the United Kingdom (but excluding consideration of individual cases); proposals for remedial orders, draft remedial orders and remedial orders. The Joint Committee has a maximum of six Members appointed by each House, of whom the quorum for any formal proceedings is two from each House. Current membership HOUSE OF LORDS HOUSE OF COMMONS Lord Bowness John Austin MP (Labour, Erith & Thamesmead) Lord Dubs Mr Douglas Carswell MP (Conservative, Harwich) Lord Lester of Herne Hill Mr Andrew Dismore MP (Labour, Hendon) (Chairman) Lord Morris of Handsworth OJ Dr Evan Harris MP (Liberal Democrat, Oxford West & The Earl of Onslow Abingdon) Baroness Stern Mr Virendra Sharma MP (Labour, Ealing, Southall) Mr Richard Shepherd MP (Conservative, Aldridge-Brownhills) Powers The Committee has the power to require the submission of written evidence and documents, to examine witnesses, to meet at any time (except when Parliament is prorogued or dissolved), to adjourn from place to place, to appoint specialist advisers, and to make Reports to both Houses.
    [Show full text]