DOCSLIB.ORG

Ex-Post Evaluation Research

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ex-Post Evaluation Research Final Report on the evaluation study titled "Ex-post evaluation of actions cofinanced by the Cross-Border Cooperation Programme Poland - Belarus - Ukraine 2007-2013" WYG PSDB Sp. z o. o. 7, Bitwy Warszawskiej 1920 street 02-366 Warsaw Tel.: + 48 22 492 71 04 Fax: + 48 22 492 71 39 www.wygpsdb.pl 1 2 Table of Contents 1. Summary ......................................................................................................................................... 5 2. Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 10 2.1. Subject matter and objectives of the study ........................................................................... 10 2.1.1. The scope of the Programme ........................................................................................ 11 2.2. Research questions ................................................................................................................ 13 3. Results of the study ....................................................................................................................... 15 3.1. Analysis of the effectiveness of the Programme ................................................................... 15 3.1.1. Location and types of projects implemented ................................................................ 15 3.1.2. Beneficiaries of the projects .......................................................................................... 21 3.1.3. Results of the projects versus the planned objectives of the Programme .................... 24 3.1.4. Projects implemented in response to local needs and challenges facing cross-border areas…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………36 3.1.5. Limitations and stimuli of cross-border cooperation .................................................... 44 3.1.6. Evaluation of the selection system and the effects of the project implementation ..... 48 3.1.7. Evaluation of the application selection system, including its effectiveness .................. 53 3.1.8. Implementation of projects ........................................................................................... 56 3.1.9. Evaluation of information and promotion activities ...................................................... 60 3.2. Analysis of the effectiveness of the Programme ................................................................... 68 3.2.1. Assessment of changes and how were the lives of local communities/target groups influenced ...................................................................................................................................... 68 3.2.2. Assessment of the impact of the Programme on Polish-Belarusian-Ukrainian relations……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………76 3.2.3. Evaluation of effects of synergy with other actions undertaken by beneficiaries ......... 79 3.2.4. Assessment of the added value of the Programme in the socio-cultural aspect and in terms of implementation of horizontal policies ............................................................................ 81 3.2.5. The impact of projects on shaping attitudes and alliances on cross-border cooperation………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………85 3.2.6. The greatest successes and failures of the Programme ................................................ 92 3 3.3. Analysis of the sustainability of the Programme ................................................................. 101 3.3.1. Assessment of sustainability of project partnerships .................................................. 101 3.3.2. Evaluation of sustainability of the results achieved .................................................... 111 4. Conclusions and recommendations ............................................................................................ 122 4.1. Table of recommendations .................................................................................................. 129 5. List of Figures ............................................................................................................................... 136 6. List of Tables ................................................................................................................................ 137 7. List of Maps ................................................................................................................................. 139 8. Annexes ....................................................................................................................................... 139 8.1. Annex 1 - Reports on the projects' case studies .................................................................. 139 8.2. Annex 2 - Reports on the municipalities' case studies ........................................................ 139 8.3. Annex 3 - Research tools ..................................................................................................... 140 8.3.1. Scenario of an interview with technical staff involved in the implementation of the Programme .................................................................................................................................. 140 8.3.2. Scenario of an interview with representatives of Poland, Belarus and Ukraine - members of the Joint Monitoring Committee (JMC) .................................................................. 141 8.3.3. Scenario of an interview with a leading partner (as a case study) .............................. 142 8.3.4. Scenario of a telephone interview with a project partner (as a case study) ............... 144 8.3.5. Scenario of an interview with a representative of a city/municipality council (as a municipality case study) .............................................................................................................. 145 8.3.6. Scenario of an interview with a councillor in a city/municipality council ................... 146 8.3.7. Scenario of an interview with a representative of a civil society organisation ........... 147 8.3.8. Scenario of an interview with a representative of the project implemented within the CBC PBU 2007-2013 in the case study municipality .................................................................... 147 8.3.9. Scenario of an interview with a representative of the project implemented in the case study municipality financed from other funds than the CBC PBU 2007-2013 ............................ 149 8.3.10. Scenario of an interview with people from the cultural or educational background at the local level ............................................................................................................................... 149 8.3.11. CAWI/CATI survey with partners ................................................................................. 150 4 1. SUMMARY This evaluation study concerns the Cross-Border Cooperation Programme 2007-2013 Poland-Belarus-Ukraine (Programme) implemented under the European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument (ENPI). This programme is a continuation and deepening of cooperation between the three neighbouring countries, with the aim of promoting cross-border development processes. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the achievements of the Programme, including the implementation of its main objective and specific objectives, which are implemented within the priorities and their subordinate measures, and the impact of the implementation of the Programme on the support areas and the economic and social lives of its inhabitants. The final report consists of 4 parts that provide knowledge about the effectiveness and rationality of assistance provided under the Programme. Following a summary of the main conclusions (Chapter 1), the research assumptions and, in brief, the methodology used (Chapter 2) are presented in the report. Chapter three of the report provides an analysis of the effectiveness, utility and sustainability of the Programme's results with references to research questions. Part four includes the conclusions and recommendations of the study. The next sections of the report are annexes consisting of case study reports and research tools used in the evaluation study. The conclusions of the study are positive, although most of them require confirmation in the longer term. The analysis of the products and results of the Programme shows that deepening and consolidating of cross-border co-operation takes place, and that the projects implemented contribute to the joint solving of the identified problems of partners. The implemented projects cover all basic areas of the economy and represent all sectors identified in the Programme as representing the areas requiring support: small and medium-sized enterprises, tourism, road, water and sewer infrastructure, environmental protection and crisis management, border infrastructure, health systems, social and cultural sphere. Projects that were non-commercial in nature were implemented under three priorities and their subordinated measures across the Programme-supported area. Beneficiaries of the Programme were representatives of all categories listed in the Programme catalogue of beneficiaries. The most of beneficiaries are local government units (38.78%), non-governmental organizations (16.84%), government administration organs (11.73%), educational units (7.65%) and hospitals (7.14%). The effects of the Programme are used by all target groups to whom the projects were addressed. Projects were mostly targeted to the largest
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Procurement and Processing of Municipal
    REPUBLIC OF BELARUS Public Disclosure Authorized INTEGRATED SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PROJECT Component I: Mechanical Waste Separation Facility in the City of Grodno Public Disclosure Authorized ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSEMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN FINAL REPORT JANUARY, 2010 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 14 1.1. Objectives and Scope of the Environmental Assessment 14 1.2. Background of Proposed Investments 14 1.3. General Description of the Proposed Facility 15 2. LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK 17 3. DESCRIPTION OF THE BASELINE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITION IN THE PROJECT AREA 19 3.1. Environmental Aspects 19 3.1.1. Description of the geographic location of the proposed facility 19 3.1.2. Climate 19 3.1.3. Air Pollution 19 3.1.4. Landscape, geological and lithological structure 21 3.1.5. Soils 22 3.1.6. Hydrography and hydrology 22 3.1.7. Surface waters 23 3.1.8. Vegetation 26 3.1.9. Wildlife 27 3.2. General overview of environmental media resistance to anthropogenic impacts 28 3.3. Socioeconomic Context 30 3.3.1. Economic situation 30 3.3.2. Demographic situation 30 3.3.3. Morbidity patterns 31 4. ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF THE PROPOSED INVESTMENTS 33 4.1. Air Impact Assessment 33 4.1.1. Description of air pollution sources 33 4.1.2. Assessment of impact in terms of ground level concentrations. Area of influence 37 4.1.3. Gross emissions 41 4.2. Assessment of Impact on Surface and Ground Waters 41 4.2.1. Description of surface and ground water pollution sources 41 4.2.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Grodno Region As a Region of Original Weaving Traditions
    GRODNO REGION AS A REGION OF ORIGINAL WEAVING TRADITIONS Ala Kolyago Yanka Kupala State University of Grodno Ab­stract Weaving of the Grodno region is one of the most important sections of national artistic culture of Belarus. Modern weaving products of the Grodno region are characterized by a deep connection with long experience of hand spriggy weaving. Local craftsmen use diverse weaving techniques, original compositional and colouristic arrangements of patterned stories. Keywords: the Grodno region, weaving, popular traditions, patterned weaving, sorted, selected, four strands, eight strands, loom weaving. Folk art of Belarus is one of the most important weft: blue, green, black, red and other dark colours. sections of national artistic culture of Belarus. Under They create a very beautiful and festive colouring. the conditions of globalization, folk art functions Weavers call their articles “pasiaki”, “viasiolka” and as a basis of culture which aims at advanced study “neshivanyia dyvany”. In addition to aesthetic side, of traditions of previous generations. Nowadays the rainbow fabrics have another important feature: preservation and development of national art is they have double width which is simultaneously regarded as an important spiritual task the solution of weaved on conventional narrow hand-loom. In other which is directly related to the national and cultural cases, one can obtain only one half of the width of revival of Belarus. fabric required for a bedspread. Many weavers of Modern folk fabric of the Grodno region is the Grodno region were familiar with this technique. characterized by a deep connection with long First of all, it referred to T. Misevich (Shchuchin experience of hand-made spriggy weaving.
    [Show full text]
  • Edict of the President of the Republic of Belarus No. 208 of April 16, 2002 [Amended As of April 30, 2015]
    Edict of the President of the Republic of Belarus No. 208 of April 16, 2002 [Amended as of April 30, 2015] On Establishment of Free Economic Zone “Grodnoinvest” With a view of attracting domestic and foreign investments to promote further development of export-oriented industries based on the novel and high technologies, to provide favorable conditions for restructuring of the national economy and efficient utilization of the available production facilities, I hereby decree to: 1. To create the free economic zone “Grodnoinvest” of the total area of 3079.17 ha within the boundaries determined by the Grodno Regional Executive Committee according to the Annex for the period of 30 years. 2. To establish that: 2.1. the free economic zone “Grodnoinvest” (hereinafter -- the FEZ “Grodnoinvest”) is a complex zone; 2.2. financing of the development of the FEZ “Grodnoinvest”, including industrial, engineering, transport and other infrastructure along with the maintenance of the administrations of the FEZ “Grodnoinvest” and other expenses stipulated by the legislations for ensuring functioning of the zone, is carried out at the account of the means of the republic budget and the development fund of the FEZ “Grodnoinvest”. The development fund of the FEZ “Grodnoinvest” is formed at the account of rent payments for land plots located within the boundaries of the FEZ “Grodnoinvest” and of the Special tourist and recreational park “Avgustovki canal” and provided into lease to its residents, rent payments for the property being in the operative administration of the administrations of the FEZ “Grodnoinvest”, as well as at the account of revenues in accordance with the contracts on activity conditions in the FEZ “Grodnoinvest” and the Special tourist and recreational park “Avgustovki canal”.
    [Show full text]
  • Town Names and Their Frequencies, Extracted from Kremenets District Documents Prepared by Dr
    Town Names and their Frequencies, extracted from Kremenets District Documents Prepared by Dr. Ronald D. Doctor ([email protected]) and Ellen Garshick ([email protected]) Co-Coordinators, Kremenets Shtetl CO-OP / Kremenets-District Research Group Sorted by Town Name Sorted by Frequency of Occurrence Town No. of Entries Rank Town No. of Entries 26 Aug 2021 → 26 Aug 2021 Admont, Austria 8 1 Kremenets 141,810 Afek, Israel 25 2 Vishnevets 48,764 Afikim, Israel 4 3 Radzivilov 39,190 Afula, Israel 50 4 Shumsk 35,746 Ahuzat Shoshana, Israel 2 5 Katerburg 17,328 see Akkerman, Akerman Yampol 15,283 Bessarabia 6 Akimovka, Melitopol 3 Vyshgorodok 13,108 district 7 Akkerman, Bessarabia 10 8 Lanovtsy 12,674 Akko, Israel 21 9 Ostrog 12,367 Aktra 2 10 Belozirka 11,413 Albany, CA 3 11 Pochayev 9,349 Albany, NY 20 12 Oleksinets 8,181 Aleksandriya, Rovno Berezhtsy, Kremenets 127 6,048 district 13 district Aleksandrovskiy district, 1 Rokhmanov 5,973 Odessa 14 Aleksiniec, Aleksinets see Oleksinets 15 Dubno 3,963 Alexandria, Egypt 1 16 Kozin 3,925 Amesbury, MA 2 17 Berezhtsy 2,680 Amsterdam, Netherlands 6 New York, NY 2,581 18 Ananyev 5 19 Lakhovtsy 2,557 Andruga village 2 20 Teofipol 2,099 Andrushovka village 15 21 Annopol 2,005 Anniston, AL 1 22 Kunev 1,573 Annopol 2,005 23 Rovno 1,189 Annopol, Ostrog district 99 24 Berestechko 1,174 Ansbach, Germany 10 25 Verba 1,105 Ansonia, CT 45 26 Israel 1,008 Antonin, Russia 2 27 Lutsk 914 Antonovka 1 28 Zaslav 816 Antonovka settlement, see Antonovka, Rovno Buenos Aires, Argentina 812 Kovale district district 29
    [Show full text]
  • Sugar Industry Overview
    August 2011 SUGAR INDUSTRY OVERVIEW Key market highlights, 2010 General description of the sector Granulated sugar production, thou t 816 PRODUCTION Granulated sugar retail turnover , thou t 165 Average annual per capita sugar consumption, 41,4 ¾ In 2010 the total production of sugar in the Republic of Belarus kg amounted to 816 thousand tons, that is by 7.5% higher than in previous year. On average, over the past three years the production of sugar has Sugar export, thou t 493,4 increased by 5.6% and reached the level of 2006. Sugar and raw sugar import, thou t 407 ¾In the Republic of Belarus there are four sugar mills producing sugar : ¾JSC «Gorodeya Sugar Refinery»(230.2 thousand tons in 2010), Granulated sugar production in the Republic of ¾JSC «Zhabinka Sugar Plant»(197.3 thousand tons in 2010.) Belarus, thou t ¾JSC «Skidelsky Sugar Refinery» (166.7 thousand tons in 2010), 1000 814,1 758,9 816 ¾JSC «Slutsk Sugar Plant» (221.8 thousand tons in 2010). 656,6 707,8 ¾About 50% of sugar is produced from sugar beets, 50% - from 500 imported raw cane sugar. The sugar produced from raw cane is supplied to the domestic market and exported to the countries of Central Asia. In 0 2010 the sugar refineries produced 412 thousand tons of sugar from 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 sugar beets. The need for this type of raw material is completely Source: National Statistics Committee of the Republic of Belarus satisfied by the domestic market. However, during recent years the total The structure of granulated sugar yield of sugar beet in the Republic of Belarus has decreased and in 2010 production in the Republic of Belarus, 2010 amounted to 3770 tons.
    [Show full text]
  • “COMMUNITY SERVICES to VULNERABLE GROUPS” USAID Cooperative Agreement Number: AID-121-A-00-05-00703 QUARTERLY PROGRAM REPOR
    “COMMUNITY SERVICES TO VULNERABLE GROUPS” USAID Cooperative Agreement Number: AID-121-A-00-05-00703 QUARTERLY PROGRAM REPORT Reporting period: 1 April 2013 – 30 June 2013 Component I “Supporting Orphans and Vulnerable Children in Belarus” Author’s Name: Irina Mironova, Chief of Party Inna Chirko, OVC Project manager Name of USAID office: USAID Regional Mission representative office in Belarus Publication or issuance date of report: July 30, 2013 Organizational Contact Information: ChildFund International-Belarus USA Headquarters: Irina Mironova Rachel Maris-Wolf Chief of Party Project & Grant Management Specialist ChildFund Belarus Infants and Young Children 39 Pushkin Ave., office 16 ChildFund International USA Minsk 220092 2821 Emerywood Parkway Belarus Richmond, Virginia 23294, USA Phone: 375-172-57-77-08 (09) Phone: (804) 545-3619 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A. PROJECT GOAL AND OBJECTIVES The purpose of the Orphans and Vulnerable Children component is to reduce the number of children in Belarus being institutionalized in state-administered orphanages and boarding schools by supporting at-home family care and moving children out of institutions. In pursuit of this goal, the project will aim to foster a cultural environment conducive to family-based care, and move children from institutions into less restrictive environments when prior circumstances necessitate removal from their family home. The project targets are ‘social orphans,’ i.e., children whose parents are living, but are unable to provide proper care, or children of parents who have been denied parental rights. The project’s activities focus on working with families and social service professionals to maintain and reintegrate children within their original family units.
    [Show full text]
  • Belarus – Ukraine 2007 – 2013
    BOOK OF PROJECTS CROSS-BORDER COOPERATION PROGRAMME POLAND – BELARUS – UKRAINE 2007 – 2013 BOOK OF PROJECTS CROSS-BORDER COOPERATION PROGRAMME POLAND – BELARUS – UKRAINE 2007 – 2013 ISBN 978-83-64233-73-9 BOOK OF PROJECTS CROSS-BORDER COOPERATION PROGRAMME POLAND – BELARUS – UKRAINE 2007 – 2013 WARSAW 2015 CROSS-BORDER COOPERATION PROGRAMME POLAND – BELARUS – UKRAINE 2007-2013 FOREWORD Dear Readers, Cross-border Cooperation Programme Poland-Belarus-Ukraine 2007-2013 enables the partners from both sides of the border to achieve their common goals and to share their experience and ideas. It brings different actors – inhabitants, institutions, organisations, enterprises and communities of the cross-border area closer to each other, in order to better exploit the opportunities of the joint development. In 2015 all the 117 projects co-financed by the Programme shall complete their activities. This publication will give you an insight into their main objectives, activities and results within the projects. It presents stories about cooperation in different fields, examples of how partner towns, villages or local institutions can grow and develop together. It proves that cross-border cooperation is a tremendous force stimulating the develop- ment of shared space and building ties over the borders. I wish all the partners involved in the projects persistence in reaching all their goals at the final stage of the Programme and I would like to congratulate them on successful endeavours in bringing tangible benefits to their communities. This publication will give you a positive picture of the border regions and I hope that it will inspire those who would like to join cross-border cooperation in the next programming period.
    [Show full text]
  • COMPLETE DRAFT Copy Copy
    Peace and Security beyond Military Power: The League of Nations and the Polish-Lithuanian Dispute (1920-1923) Chiara Tessaris Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2014 © 2014 Chiara Tessaris All rights reserved ABSTRACT Peace and Security beyond Military Power: The League of Nations and the Polish- Lithuanian Dispute Chiara Tessaris Based on the case study of the mediation of the Polish-Lithuanian dispute from 1920 to 1923, this dissertation explores the League of Nations’ emergence as an agency of modern territorial and ethnic conflict resolution. It argues that in many respects, this organization departed from prewar traditional diplomacy to establish a new, broader concept of security. At first the league tried simply to contain the Polish-Lithuanian conflict by appointing a Military Commission to assist these nations in fixing a final border. But the occupation of Vilna by Polish troops in October 1920 exacerbated Polish-Lithuanian relations, turning the initial border dispute into an ideological conflict over the ethnically mixed region of Vilna, claimed by the Poles on ethnic grounds while the Lithuanians considered it the historical capital of the modern Lithuanian state. The occupation spurred the league to greater involvement via administration of a plebiscite to decide the fate of the disputed territories. When this strategy failed, Geneva resorted to negotiating the so-called Hymans Plan, which aimed to create a Lithuanian federal state and establish political and economic cooperation between Poland and Lithuania. This analysis of the league’s mediation of this dispute walks the reader through the league’s organization of the first international peacekeeping operation, its handling of the challenges of open diplomacy, and its efforts to fulfill its ambitious mandate not just to prevent war but also to uproot its socioeconomic and ethnic causes.
    [Show full text]
  • COUNTRY SECTION Belarus Game Trophies Plants
    Validity date from COUNTRY Belarus 10/08/2007 00035 SECTION Game trophies plants Date of publication 15/01/2020 List in force Approval number Name City Regions Activities Remark Date of request 02088/0319016 State Forest Enterprises Starobin forestry Starobin Minskaya Voblasts' CAT3 0649122 BELKOOPOPTTORG Minsk Minskaya Voblasts' CAT3 100021168 UP Minsky Parnikovo-teplichny Kombinat Minsk Minskaya Voblasts' CAT2, CAT3 20/09/2011 100150558 Production Trade Unitary Enterprise Voenohot Public Association Minsk Minskaya Voblasts' CAT3 Belarusian military- hunting enterprise 101131971 State Forest Enterprises “Minsk forestry” Minsk Minskaya Voblasts' CAT3 191090820 PC AnFrid Zhodino Minskaya Voblasts' CAT3 200017622 State Forestry Enterprise Baranovichskij leshoz Baranovichi Brestskaya Voblasts' CAT3 200026472 State Forestry Enterprise Pruzhanskij leshoz Prugany Brestskaya Voblasts' CAT3 200034591 JV Variant Ltd Bereza Brestskaya Voblasts' CAT3 200041354 State Forestry Enterprise Kobrinskij leshoz Kobrin Brestskaya Voblasts' CAT3 200056212 State Protective Institution National Park Kamenyki, Brestskaya Voblasts' CAT3 07/09/2011 200062459 Establishment “Brest Regional Organizational Structure” of National Brest Brestskaya Voblasts' CAT3 15/04/2016 Public Association “Belarusian Society of Hunters and Fishermen” 200099512 State Forestry Enterprise Telehanskij leshoz Telehany Brestskaya Voblasts' CAT3 200100542 State Forestry Enterprise Ivatsevichskij leshoz Ivatsevichi Brestskaya Voblasts' CAT3 1 / 16 List in force Approval number Name City
    [Show full text]
  • COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 271/2011
    22.3.2011 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 76/13 COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 271/2011 of 21 March 2011 implementing Article 8a(1) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures against President Lukashenko and certain officials of Belarus THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, and IA to Regulation (EC) No 765/2006. Furthermore, the information relating to certain persons on the lists in Annexes I and IA to that Regulation should be updated, Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 of 18 May 2006 concerning restrictive measures against President Lukashenko and certain officials of Belarus ( 1 ), and HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: in particular Article 8a(1) thereof, Whereas: Article 1 Annexes I and IA to Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 shall be (1) On 18 May 2006, the Council adopted Regulation (EC) replaced by the text set out in Annexes I and II to this Regu­ No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures against lation. President Lukashenko and certain officials of Belarus. Article 2 (2) In view of the gravity of the situation in Belarus, addi­ tional persons should be included in the lists of persons This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publi­ subject to restrictive measures as set out in Annexes I cation in the Official Journal of the European Union. This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States. Done at Brussels, 21 March 2011. For the Council The President C. ASHTON ( 1 ) OJ L 134, 20.5.2006, p.
    [Show full text]
  • UNESCO Heritage
    www.belarustourism.by UNESCO Heritage Jewel necklace from pearls of Belarus www.belarustourism.by | 1 CONTENT INTRODUCTION BELOVEZHSKAYA PUSHCHA 6 CASTLE COMPLEX "MIR" 8 ARCHITECTURAL AND CULTURAL COMPLEX OF THE RADZIWILL FAMILY AT NESVIZH 10 GEODESIC STRUVE ARC 12 ALIVE TRADITIONS OF FORGOTTEN TIMES 14 PEARL COLLECTION 16 index location num- on the page ber map 1 G1 Belovezhskaya Pushcha, (Kamenyuki village, 6 iscover the enchanting beauty of Kamenets district, Brest region, GPS: 52°33’18"N, 2 H1 Archaeological Museum "Berastse" (Brest City, 7 DBelarus! Belarus with its elegant Brest region, GPS: 52°6’1"N, 23°40’48"E) 3 H1 Museum "Saved artistic value", (Brest City, 7 old palaces and mighty castles, steeped in Brest region, GPS: 52°6’1"N, 23°40’48"E) 4 E4 Castle complex "Mir" (Korelichi district, Grodno 8 legends, mysterious lakes and forests, richly region, GPS: 53°27’7"N, 26°28’11"E) 5 E4 Pokrovsk church (XIX c.), (Turets, Korelichi 9 laden with ringing piney scent. district, Grodno region, GPS: 53°31’42"N, 26°18’39"E) 6 E4 St. Anna’s church (XVIII c.), (Voroncha, Korelichi 9 You will visit hundreds of amazing district, Grodno region, GPS: 53°25’1"N, 26°3’34"E) 7 F4 Architectural and Cultural Complex of the Radzi- 10 historical sites and will be pleasantly surprised will Family at Nesvizh, (Nesvizh, Nesvizh district, Minsk region, GPS: 53°13’22"N, 26°41’30"E) by the boundless hospitality of the Belarusian 8 E4 St. Peter and St. Paul’s Church (1588), (Novyj 11 Sverzen, Stolbtsy district, Minsk region, people.
    [Show full text]
  • Belarusian CCI's Exporters Catalogue 2021
    CONTENTS FOREWORD ................................................................................................................. 6 BELARUS. GENERAL INFORMATION .............................................................................. 8 BELARUSIAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY ............................................. 10 EXHIBITION UNITARY ENTERPRISE ‘BELINTEREXPO’ OF THE BELARUSIAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY ............................. 12 UNITARY ENTERPRISE OF PATENT SERVICES ‘BELPATENTSERVICE’ OF THE BELARUSIAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY ............................. 13 EDUCATIONAL AND CONSULTING UNITARY ENTERPRISE OF THE BELARUSIAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY ‘BUSINESS TRAINING CENTER’ ................ 14 INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION COURT AT THE BELCCI ............................................. 15 LIST OF HEADINGS ..................................................................................................... 16 Belarusian Chamber of Commerce and Industry A. MECHANICAL ENGINEERING ................................................................................. 17 A1. Machine-Tool Engineering ................................................................................... 18 BELARUSIAN EXPORTERS 2021 A2. Motor Vehicle Industry ......................................................................................... 21 Reference and information edition A3. Production of Other Vehicles ................................................................................ 35 www.cci.by A4. Agricultural
    [Show full text]