"

! " " !

~;

'

. .

> >

f;';';

, ,

;\

~; ~;

"

»'

j,J

•.. •..

" "

~. ~.

"...

'

Member Member

.erve .erve

.ubmitted. .ubmitted.

conditions conditions

public public

associated associated new new

upon upon

Annex Annex

international international that that

PPWG PPWG

WHO WHO

amphetamines

immediate immediate

It It of of

-

lIeeting. lIeeting.

Health Health

Session Session

1. 1.

ere ere

Irticles

lhe lhe

form.1 form.1

IbstrlCted IbstrlCted

The The

ldbereviewed ldbereviewed

abuse abuse

is is

procedures procedures

6. 6.

4. 4.

5. 5.

3. 3.

in in 2. 2.

The The 1. 1.

rt$ponsible rt$ponsible

adequate adequate

World World

The The could could

and and

iSSue iSSue

available available

which which

principles principles

substances substances

as as "to "to

. .

Dr Dr

Welcome Welcome

2. 2.

also also

health health States, States,

Publication

the the

organization organization

Group Group

a a

of of

Norman Norman

Hr Hr

Summary Summary United United

consultative consultative

ECDD ECDD INTERPOL INTERPOL

Review Review

of of

(MNH/PAD/84.10), (MNH/PAD/84.10), Note Note or or

Note Note

select select

of of

action. action.

warning warning

The The

Health Health was was

with with

be be

performance performance

WHO's WHO's

represent represent

The The

the the

J. J.

quoted quoted

substances substances

ORG

this this

W

and and

addre

problems, problems, for for

control control

information information

O

taken taken

in in

had had

from from

hazards hazards

. .

for for

meeting meeting

satisfied, satisfied,

G. G.

on on

R

United United to to

Director-General Director-General

Sartorius Sartorius

document document

the the

Nations Nations

of of

Organization

of of

AN

immediately, immediately,

any any

L

o

1985. 1985.

It It

provide provide

responsibility responsibility

v

in in

LeCavalier LeCavalier

H D

the the

f f

Report Report

w i

the the

the the

the the

ews ews

for for

s

All All

IS

Uncontrolled Uncontrolled

Committee Committee

i

the the

sho

substance, substance,

thout thout

s s

Sub

by by

of of

great great

and and

A A

RE

E

the the

and and

dependence dependence

u

could could

nature nature

n

Record. Record.

next next

following following

was was

associated associated Nations Nations

the the

expressed expressed

ld ld ALTH ALTH

s

the the

P

the the of of

and and

new new

does does those those

supporting supporting

ON ON

Division Division

tan

O

The The

the the

the the

-

. .

R

advice advice

most most n

no no

offered offered

on on

introdu

O T

Dr Dr

o

this this

responsible responsible

detail detail

called called

ce ce

Director-General Director-General

Statu

b t uncontrolled uncontrolled

consequent consequent

review review

Author

regular regular

M

be be

not not

list list

agreement agreement

reconunendations reconunendations

O

Secretar

completeness completeness

F F

of of

O

M. M.

on on

in in

-like amphetamine-like

Li

e e

R

NDI

serious serious

Commis

upon upon

made made

in in

A

c

Correspondence Correspondence

G

function, function,

revi

s

onst

N N

the the Amphetamin s s

C

Problems Problems

under under

to to

s s

THE THE

might might

information information

accordance accordance

A

c

liability liability t. t.

o

of of

. .

with with

within within

signed signed

in in

t

A

the the

AD AD

of of

N

f f

e

alone alone

proc

urgency urgency

o

wed

i

Gerald Gerald

LF LF

the the

tute tute

IZ

sessi

sufficient sufficient

ry ry

Committee's Committee's

Narc

to to

substances substances

"U

of of

view view

s

i

G R

F

HO

A

, ,

at, at,

greetings greetings

ion ion

e

e

e

public public

NCO

the the e

DE DE

authorities. authorities.

TION TION

also also social social

the the

r

port port

ne

netylline netylline

the the

C C

Director-General Director-General

dures dures

e

o

amphetamines amphetamines

o

one one

mark

v

ti CO

review review

of of

N

n n

on on

of of

and and

and and

a

L

e

T treaties, treaties,

use use

and and

Director-General. Director-General.

for for

D c

N

, ,

A A

s s

\'.' \'.'

of of with with

R

be be

were were

f

S

Drug Drug

b O

would would year, year,

Narcotic Narcotic

Re WROD

s s

ro

UL

l7 l7

health health

for for

o

e

S

L

and and

qualities qualities

p

ru

between between

LED LED

the the

A advised advised

drugs drugs and and

fore fore

f f

r

m m

evidence evidence action. action. s

the/public the/public

T

considered considered

ovid olution olution

o

I\TF I\TF

M

A

gs gs responsibilitie

the the

resolution resolution the the

f f

discussed. discussed.

a

T

the the

Provisional Provisional

(

Dependence, Dependence,

health health

r

F

lO

C

A}lP

abuse abuse

be be

regardless regardless

Dr Dr

c

ebruary ebruary

Report Report

ommi

it: it:

e

1 h

N O N

availa

WHO WHO problems. problems.

to to

for for d d

Governm

will will

H

Drugs Drugs

submitted submitted

Mahler, Mahler,

O

Degussa Degussa

E

expr

l

l

to to

r

C

background background

11 11

e

984 984

N N

'

esum

continuously continuously

T

Org

s

u

e e of of

E

Second, Second,

consistent consistent

concerning concerning

A

C C consequences consequences

rs rs

(EB73Rll), (EB73Rll), sion". sion".

of of

which which

/

n

A

MI

i

e e

indicate, indicate,

CN.

health health

a

mees mees

C

be be

(MNAR

b

for for

docum

aut

e e

nisati

actually actually

TION TION

1

le le

NE

doi

2(S-VII) 2(S-VII)

these these

in in

e

L L

98

e

7/

ni ni

nt nt

First, First,

subject subject

Internati

U uf uf

S" S"

t t

of of

Dir

This This

4

o

the the

nited nited

Phama Phama

in

. .

dans dans

/

data data

F

s. s.

l

e

/

n n

s s

d'aucu

The The

) )

fa

....;I ....;I

at at

e

98 nl nl

if if

of of

1

CO

f

e;-

whether whether

bruary bruary

ire ire

e

and and

98

mondial

and and

I I

ormation ormation

4

s

ctor-General ctor-General

i

N

discussion discussion

ubstances ubstances

n

neither neither

/ with with

this this

Ca

4

would would

CE

les les

n

p

Consultation Consultation

and and

I'o

has has

in in

L.4 L.4

ne ne

increasing increasing

formati

e e

a a

/

o

examine examine

Gruppe Gruppe

States States

and and

social social

n

4

RNING RNING

of of

two two

b

ssible ssible

and and

a

articles articles

recommendation recommendation

le

) )

o

c

c,tation c,tation e e

his his

da

on

d t nal nal

make make

been been

19

at at

time. time.

the the

d

full full

cons

a a

st

have have

p

e e

, ,

to to

84 84

'

o

itu

au

on on

communication communication

notification notification

of of

o

th

l ssible ssible

Co

o

a a

and and

c

sigm!s sigm!s n n

e e

problems problems

principles principles

need need

any any

f f

un un

its its review review

which which

whi c

i

san

e e

ntrol ntrol revi

appears appears

URIG Sant

uncontrolled uncontrolled

MNtI

pa

stent stent

o

ab

these these

to to

America America

The The

Eighth Eighth

llect

harm harm

of of

s s

s s

co

Dr Dr

c

o

e

was was

indications indications

un /

findin

h h

I

u

n'engagent n'engagent

be be

m

, ,

'

e

I

for for

P

a

th t t

a

e e

w w

u

NAL

AD p

I. I.

then then L

substances substances

ur

ction

t

t

with with

es es

or

ed ed

those those

e e

publ

and and

)N:Jf

e e

th two two

based based

by by

to to

/

g

for for

i

in in

8

Khan Khan

s

re

: :

ed ed

W

Sp e e

opin

a

4

g

and and

o

ti

i

nd of of

c

the the

help help

ma .

s s

was was

X

e

o

rld rld

a

s s

EN

4 4

u u

with with

t fCQ fCQ

WHO: WHO:

d n the the

cial cial

io

Qu

ion

y y

ou ou

th

; ;

G

n

e e

e e

s s

L

. .

, ,

e e

I

S H H MNH/PAD/84.4 page 2 :';. 7. . Report from National Institute on Drug Abuse, USA, Or J. Cooper

8. Gutachten uber 30 Substanzen der Amphetamin- Reihe, Or W. Keup (1984)

2. Report by INTERPOL

The INTERPOL report emphasized the status of fenetylline (captagone) on the illicit dr ua market. Seizures of captagone were reported from 13 countries mostly in the Middle and Near East with the volume of seizures increasing from 2.08 million units in 1981 to more', th an 11.87 million in 1983. Data were not available on other listed substances because information collection was suspended by INTERPOL in January 1984 following notice of cancellation of the 9th Review of Psychoactive Substances meeting. In the discussions which followed, the need for collecting and presenting comparative data on the illicit traffic , in scheduled substances of the same class was noted. "

3. Report by the United Nations Division of Narcotic Drugs (UNDND)

The report from' UNDNDsummarized .responses from 45 Member States, which listed isolat d cases of abuse and seizures of a number of the listed substances . "

In the discussion which followed, two fundamental issues were examined. Data obtaine d from specific States, by different collecting agencies (INTERPOL, UNDND, etc.), during th e same time period, may differ significantly. Information was, for , example, submitted to 'cc,, " INTERPOL on fenetylline from Jordan, Lebanon and Saudi Arabia but not to UNDND. In addi tion, dissimilar data appear to result , from different - sources of information within the Membel:;~ States providing dat 'aand because di fferent meanings are ascribed to terms (e .g., "abuse" ,). To improve the comparability of the data collected among States ', the need to defineprec iaely the terms used was noted. . 4. Pharmacological data

Amphetamine,-like drugs were classified into two general categories: hallucinogens : and ; the pharmacological profile of amphetamines share either one or both of ' thesllc properties to some extent. These properties are very relevant to predicting ' the abuse I f liability of such substances and' their ill-effects. The epidemiological data on the public health and social problems associated with the use of these substances would appear to be.. more applicable in assessing them for international control than do, 1aborat-ory data. Ati:' present, while limited data on these substances are available, active research is current ly being conducted in these areas, and useful results may be available in the near future.

5. Reports from countries

A report from Canada was presented in which the 28 uncontrolled amphetamines were " classified into three groups~marketed substances (16); unmarketed substances with potent ial medical use (2); and drugs with no known medical useOO). The last category of substanc e. has been associated with reports of abuse, toxic reactions, and possible deaths. The need for a more comprehensive review of all the substances was emphasized and attention was d·raw to the hazards produced by dimethoxybromoamphetamine (DOB) and methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA), namely, their abuse and the adverse reactions and toxicity associated with their u.e.

A NIDA (USA) report sUlllUarized the existing control status of these substances in t he United St~t~s;of the listed substances, 8 are in Schedule I of the Controlled Sub&tance. Act. While ~o urgent problems exist at present in the United States, of all the substanc es MDA and DOB appeared to be worthy of consideration for international control. No, abuse " problem has been reported with fenety1line in the United States of America, although some quantities of the substance have been seized in illicit transit. In the report from the Federal Republic of Germany, fenetylline was emphasized as constituting a major public health and social problem. In addition, some problems are als o associated with the non-medical use of .

The availability of the listed substances in Brazil was reviewed and fencamfamine and were observed to be creating some problems. MNH/PAD/84.4 page 3

Discussions and conclusions

6.1 It was unanimously agreed that a more comprehensive data base would be required by the Expert Committee to critically evaluate the listed substances and make recommendations on their international control, based upon the newly developed "Guidelines for the WHOProgramme for the Review of Psychoactive Substances for International Control".

6.2 From among the 28 substances listed, dimethoxybromoamphetamine (DOB) and thylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA) have been observed to be associated with causing public health and social problems in a number of WHOMember States, and it was recommended that the Director-General should prepare a notification for international control in Schedule I of the convention on Psychotropic Substances.

In the case of the hallucinogen, MDA, which has no known medical use, reports indicate th. t there is evidence of abuse, toxicity and substance-related deaths in Australia, Canada, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America. The presence of MDA in the il licit drug market, evidenced by seizure data, illicit traffic and the discovery of clandestine manufacturing laboratories in a number of countries, including the United States of .America further illustrate the magnitude of the problem this substance presents.

The hallucinogen DOB has no medically accepted use and has been reported to be •• sociated with toxicity, morbidity and mortality. Seizure incidents have also been reported from some countries, including Australia, Sweden, the United Kingdom and the United States of rica.

6.3 The committee further suggested that this report be submitted to the Director-General together with its recommendations about WHOnotifications to the Secr~tary-Generalof the United Nations. It was unanimously agreed that all 28 Hsted .ub stances, including DOB and MDA, be formally reviewed by the next Expert Committee on Drug Dependence, in accordance with the new procedures. MNH/PAD/84.4 page 4

ANNEX1

LIST OF PARTICIPANTS

1. Dr Smail Bouzer,* Deputy Director of Pharmacy, Ministry of Public Health, Algiers, Algeria

2. Dr V. M. Bulaev, Deputy Chief, Department for the Introduction of New Drugs and Medical Technology, Ministry of Health of the USSR, Rahmanovskij per. 3, 1011431 CSP Moscow N-5l, USSR

3. Professor E. A. Carlini, Department of Psychobiology, Paulista School of Medicine, Rue Botucata 862 - 10, Andar 040233, Sao Paulo SP, Brazil

4. Dr W. Keup, Professor of Psychiatry, Jos-Schauer-Strasse 10, 8039 Puchheim, Federal Republic of Germany

5. Dr Jacques G. LeCavalier, Director, Bureau of Dangerous Drugs, Health Protection Branch, ·· Ottawa, Canada

6. Dr o. Ogunremi, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ilorin, P.M.B. 1515, Ilorin, Nigeria (Rapporteur)

7. Professor Bror Rexed, Thomas Heftyes Gate l4C, Oslo 2, Norway (Chairman)

8. Dr C. R. Schuster, Director, Drug Dependence Research Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States of America

9. Dr T. Yanagita, Director, Preclinical Research Laboratories, Central Institute for Experimental Animals, Kawasaki, Japan

REPRESENTATIVESOF OTHER ORGANIZATIONS

United Nations Division of Narcotic Drugs

Mr P. K. Bailey, Chief, Treaty Implementation and Commission Secretariat Section, Unibed Nations Division of Narcotic Drugs, Vienna International Centre, Vienna, Austria

Mr F. Ramos Galino, Deputy Director, United Nations Divison of Narcotic Drugs, Vienna International Centre, Vienna, Austria

International Narcotics Control Board

Hr A. Bahi, Secretary, International Narcotics Control Board, Vienna International Centre, Vienna, Austria International Criminal Police Organization

Mr Helge De Fine, Specialist Officer in charge of Psychotropic Substances, International Criminal Police Organization, 26 rue Armengaud, Saint-Cloud, France

WHOCOLLABORATING CENTRES

National Institute of Drug Abuse

Dr James Cooper, Assistant Director for Medical Affairs, NIDA, Department of Health, Education and Welfare, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockvi11e, Maryland 20857, United States of America

Mr A11an Duncan,* Deputy Associate Commissioner for Health Affairs, FDA, Department of Health, Education and Welfare, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland 20857, United States America

* Invited but unable to attend. MNH/PAD/84.4 page 5

Annex 1 In.tituto Mexicano de Psiquiatria, Mexico*

Health Research Institute, Chulangkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand*

Jational Drug Dependence Clinical Research Centre, Universiti Sains, Penang, Malaysia*

'," 'WHO SECRETARIAT

""~rMichael C. Gerald, Consultant, Division of Mental Health, WHO, Geneva (Co-Rapporteur)

Hr T. Ito, Pharmacist, Division of Mental Health, WHO, Geneva

Or lnayat Khan, Senior Medical Officer, Division of Mental Health, WHO, Geneva (Secretary)

'. Dr Norman Sartorius, Director, Divison of Mental Health, WHO, Geneva

...... ;. ---:----- * Inv1ted. but unable to attend. MNH/PAD/84.4 page 6

ANNEX2

LIST OF SUBSTANCES CONSIDERED BY THE AD HOC CONSULTATIONON ACTION CONCERNING "UNCONTROLLEDAMPHETAMINES"

Geneva, 17 March 1984

1. Cathine (norpseudophedrine) 2. 3. C1obenzorex 4. '::" 5. Dimethoxybromoamphetamine (DOB) 6. Eti1amfetamine (ethy1amphetamine) 7. 8. Fencamfamine 9. Fenet y11ine 10. 11. 12. Levamfetamine 13. 14. 15. Methoxyamphetamine (PMA) 16. Methy1enedioxyamphetamine (MDA) 17. Morazone 18. para-methoxyamphetamine 19. 20. Propy1hexedrine 21. Pyrova1erone 22. (TMA) 23. 4-Bromo-2,5-dimethoxyphenethy1amine 24. 2,5-Dimethoxy-4-ethy1amphetamine (DOET) 25. N,N-Dimethy1amphetamine (dimetamfetamine) 26. N-Ethyl-3,4,Methy1enedioxyamphetamine (N-Ethy1-MDA) 27 . 5-Methoxy-3,4-methy1enedioxyamphetamine (MMDA) 28. 3,4-Methy1enedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) HNH/PAD/84.4 page 7

ANNEX 3

CONTENTSOF THE FILE

1. Note for the Record. Correspondence between Degussa Phama Gruppe and Dr I. Khan

2. Note from Committee on Problems of Drug Dependence, United States of America

3. Review of Uncontrolled Amphetamines for Provisional International Control (MNH/PAD/84.l0) , Dr M. C. Gerald

4. INTERPOL Report - Status of Fenetylline (February 1984)

5. United Nations Division of Narcotic Drugs Report (MNAR/1984/4)

.6. Summary of Substance List. Report from the Government of Canada, Mr J. G. LeCavalier

7. Phenethylamines. Report from National Institute on Drug Abuse, United States of America, Dr J. Cooper

8. Gutachten uber 30 Substanzen der Amphetamin- Reihe, Dr W. Keup