"
! " " !
~;
'
. .
> >
f;';';
, ,
;\
~; ~;
"
»'
j,J
•.. •..
" "
~. ~.
"...
'
Member Member
.erve .erve
.ubmitted. .ubmitted.
conditions conditions
public public
associated associated new new
upon upon
Annex Annex
international international that that
PPWG PPWG
WHO WHO
amphetamines amphetamines
immediate immediate
It It of of
-
lIeeting. lIeeting.
Health Health
Session Session
1. 1.
ere ere
Irticles
lhe lhe
form.1 form.1
IbstrlCted IbstrlCted
The The
ldbereviewed ldbereviewed
abuse abuse
is is
procedures procedures
6. 6.
4. 4.
5. 5.
3. 3.
in in 2. 2.
The The 1. 1.
rt$ponsible rt$ponsible
adequate adequate
World World
The The could could
and and
iSSue iSSue
available available
which which
principles principles
substances substances
as as "to "to
. .
Dr Dr
Welcome Welcome
2. 2.
also also
health health States, States,
Publication
the the
organization organization
Group Group
a a
of of
Norman Norman
Hr Hr
Summary Summary United United
consultative consultative
ECDD ECDD INTERPOL INTERPOL
Review Review
of of
(MNH/PAD/84.10), (MNH/PAD/84.10), Note Note or or
Note Note
select select
of of
action. action.
warning warning
The The
Health Health was was
with with
be be
performance performance
WHO's WHO's
represent represent
The The
the the
J. J.
quoted quoted
substances substances
ORG
this this
W
and and
addre
problems, problems, for for
control control
information information
O
taken taken
in in
had had
from from
hazards hazards
. .
for for
meeting meeting
satisfied, satisfied,
G. G.
on on
R
United United to to
Director-General Director-General
Sartorius Sartorius
document document
the the
Nations Nations
of of
Organization
of of
AN
immediately, immediately,
any any
L
o
1985. 1985.
It It
provide provide
responsibility responsibility
v
in in
LeCavalier LeCavalier
H D
the the
f f
Report Report
w i
the the
the the
the the
ews ews
for for
s
All All
IS
Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Committee Committee
i
the the
sho
substance, substance,
thout thout
s s
Sub
by by
of of
great great
and and
A A
RE
E
the the
and and
dependence dependence
u
could could
nature nature
n
Record. Record.
next next
following following
was was
associated associated Nations Nations
the the
expressed expressed
ld ld ALTH ALTH
s
the the
P
the the of of
and and
new new
does does those those
supporting supporting
ON ON
Division Division
tan
O
The The
the the
the the
-
. .
R
advice advice
most most n
no no
offered offered
on on
introdu
O T
Dr Dr
o
this this
responsible responsible
detail detail
called called
ce ce
Director-General Director-General
Statu
b t uncontrolled uncontrolled
consequent consequent
review review
Author
regular regular
M
be be
not not
list list
agreement agreement
reconunendations reconunendations
O
Secretar
completeness completeness
F F
of of
O
M. M.
on on
in in
amphetamine-like amphetamine-like
Li
e e
R
NDI
serious serious
Commis
upon upon
made made
in in
A
c
Correspondence Correspondence
G
function, function,
revi
s
onst
N N
the the Amphetamin s s
C
Problems Problems
under under
to to
s s
THE THE
might might
information information
accordance accordance
A
c
liability liability t. t.
o
of of
. .
with with
within within
signed signed
in in
t
A
the the
AD AD
of of
N
f f
e
alone alone
proc
urgency urgency
o
wed
i
Gerald Gerald
LF LF
the the
tute tute
IZ
sessi
sufficient sufficient
ry ry
Committee's Committee's
Narc
to to
substances substances
"U
of of
view view
s
i
G R
F
HO
A
, ,
at, at,
greetings greetings
ion ion
e
e
e
public public
NCO
the the e
DE DE
authorities. authorities.
TION TION
also also social social
the the
r
port port
ne
netylline netylline
the the
C C
Director-General Director-General
dures dures
e
o
amphetamines amphetamines
o
one one
mark
v
ti CO
review review
of of
N
n n
on on
of of
and and
and and
a
L
e
T treaties, treaties,
use use
and and
Director-General. Director-General.
for for
D c
N
, ,
A A
s s
\'.' \'.'
of of with with
R
be be
were were
f
S
Drug Drug
b O
would would year, year,
Narcotic Narcotic
Re WROD
s s
ro
UL
l7 l7
health health
for for
o
e
S
L
and and
qualities qualities
p
ru
between between
LED LED
the the
A advised advised
drugs drugs and and
fore fore
f f
r
m m
evidence evidence action. action. s
the/public the/public
T
considered considered
ovid olution olution
o
I\TF I\TF
M
A
gs gs responsibilitie
the the
resolution resolution the the
f f
discussed. discussed.
a
T
the the
Provisional Provisional
(
Dependence, Dependence,
health health
r
F
lO
C
A}lP
abuse abuse
be be
regardless regardless
Dr Dr
c
ebruary ebruary
Report Report
ommi
it: it:
e
1 h
N O N
availa
WHO WHO problems. problems.
to to
for for d d
Governm
will will
H
Drugs Drugs
submitted submitted
Mahler, Mahler,
O
Degussa Degussa
E
expr
l
l
to to
r
C
background background
11 11
e
984 984
N N
'
esum
continuously continuously
T
Org
s
u
e e of of
E
Second, Second,
consistent consistent
concerning concerning
A
C C consequences consequences
rs rs
(EB73Rll), (EB73Rll), sion". sion".
of of
which which
/
n
A
MI
i
e e
indicate, indicate,
CN.
health health
a
mees mees
C
be be
(MNAR
b
for for
docum
aut
e e
nisati
actually actually
TION TION
1
le le
NE
doi
2(S-VII) 2(S-VII)
these these
in in
e
L L
98
e
7/
ni ni
nt nt
First, First,
subject subject
Internati
U uf uf
S" S"
t t
of of
Dir
This This
4
o
the the
nited nited
Phama Phama
in
. .
dans dans
/
data data
F
s. s.
l
e
/
n n
s s
d'aucu
The The
) )
fa
....;I ....;I
at at
e
98 nl nl
if if
of of
1
CO
f
e;-
whether whether
bruary bruary
ire ire
e
and and
98
mondial
and and
I I
ormation ormation
4
s
ctor-General ctor-General
i
N
discussion discussion
ubstances ubstances
n
neither neither
/ with with
this this
Ca
4
would would
CE
les les
n
p
Consultation Consultation
and and
I'o
has has
in in
L.4 L.4
ne ne
increasing increasing
formati
e e
a a
/
o
examine examine
Gruppe Gruppe
States States
and and
social social
n
4
RNING RNING
of of
two two
b
ssible ssible
and and
a
articles articles
recommendation recommendation
le
) )
o
c
c,tation c,tation e e
his his
da
on
d t nal nal
make make
been been
19
at at
time. time.
the the
d
full full
cons
a a
st
have have
p
e e
, ,
to to
84 84
'
o
itu
au
on on
communication communication
notification notification
of of
o
th
l ssible ssible
Co
o
a a
and and
c
sigm!s sigm!s n n
e e
problems problems
principles principles
need need
any any
f f
un un
its its review review
which which
whi c
i
san
e e
ntrol ntrol revi
appears appears
URIG Sant
uncontrolled uncontrolled
MNtI
pa
stent stent
o
ab
these these
to to
America America
The The
Eighth Eighth
llect
harm harm
of of
s s
s s
co
Dr Dr
c
o
e
was was
indications indications
un /
findin
h h
I
u
n'engagent n'engagent
be be
m
, ,
'
e
I
for for
P
a
th t t
a
e e
w w
u
NAL
AD p
I. I.
then then L
substances substances
ur
ction
t
t
with with
es es
or
ed ed
those those
e e
publ
and and
)N:Jf
e e
th two two
based based
by by
to to
/
g
for for
i
in in
8
Khan Khan
s
re
: :
ed ed
W
Sp e e
opin
a
4
g
and and
o
ti
i
nd of of
c
the the
help help
ma .
s s
was was
X
e
o
rld rld
a
s s
EN
4 4
u u
with with
t fCQ fCQ
WHO: WHO:
d n the the
cial cial
io
Qu
ion
y y
ou ou
th
; ;
G
n
e e
e e
s s
L
. .
, ,
e e
I
S H H MNH/PAD/84.4 page 2 :';. 7. Phenethylamines. Report from National Institute on Drug Abuse, USA, Or J. Cooper
8. Gutachten uber 30 Substanzen der Amphetamin- Reihe, Or W. Keup (1984)
2. Report by INTERPOL
The INTERPOL report emphasized the status of fenetylline (captagone) on the illicit dr ua market. Seizures of captagone were reported from 13 countries mostly in the Middle and Near East with the volume of seizures increasing from 2.08 million units in 1981 to more', th an 11.87 million in 1983. Data were not available on other listed substances because information collection was suspended by INTERPOL in January 1984 following notice of cancellation of the 9th Review of Psychoactive Substances meeting. In the discussions which followed, the need for collecting and presenting comparative data on the illicit traffic , in scheduled substances of the same class was noted. "
3. Report by the United Nations Division of Narcotic Drugs (UNDND)
The report from' UNDNDsummarized .responses from 45 Member States, which listed isolat d cases of abuse and seizures of a number of the listed substances . "
In the discussion which followed, two fundamental issues were examined. Data obtaine d from specific States, by different collecting agencies (INTERPOL, UNDND, etc.), during th e same time period, may differ significantly. Information was, for , example, submitted to 'cc,, " INTERPOL on fenetylline from Jordan, Lebanon and Saudi Arabia but not to UNDND. In addi tion, dissimilar data appear to result , from different - sources of information within the Membel:;~ States providing dat 'aand because di fferent meanings are ascribed to terms (e .g., "abuse" ,). To improve the comparability of the data collected among States ', the need to defineprec iaely the terms used was noted. . 4. Pharmacological data
Amphetamine,-like drugs were classified into two general categories: hallucinogens : and stimulants; the pharmacological profile of amphetamines share either one or both of ' thesllc properties to some extent. These properties are very relevant to predicting ' the abuse I f liability of such substances and' their ill-effects. The epidemiological data on the public health and social problems associated with the use of these substances would appear to be.. more applicable in assessing them for international control than do, 1aborat-ory data. Ati:' present, while limited data on these substances are available, active research is current ly being conducted in these areas, and useful results may be available in the near future.
5. Reports from countries
A report from Canada was presented in which the 28 uncontrolled amphetamines were " classified into three groups~marketed substances (16); unmarketed substances with potent ial medical use (2); and drugs with no known medical useOO). The last category of substanc e. has been associated with reports of abuse, toxic reactions, and possible deaths. The need for a more comprehensive review of all the substances was emphasized and attention was d·raw to the hazards produced by dimethoxybromoamphetamine (DOB) and methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA), namely, their abuse and the adverse reactions and toxicity associated with their u.e.
A NIDA (USA) report sUlllUarized the existing control status of these substances in t he United St~t~s;of the listed substances, 8 are in Schedule I of the Controlled Sub&tance. Act. While ~o urgent problems exist at present in the United States, of all the substanc es MDA and DOB appeared to be worthy of consideration for international control. No, abuse " problem has been reported with fenety1line in the United States of America, although some quantities of the substance have been seized in illicit transit. In the report from the Federal Republic of Germany, fenetylline was emphasized as constituting a major public health and social problem. In addition, some problems are als o associated with the non-medical use of cathine.
The availability of the listed substances in Brazil was reviewed and fencamfamine and pyrovalerone were observed to be creating some problems. MNH/PAD/84.4 page 3
Discussions and conclusions
6.1 It was unanimously agreed that a more comprehensive data base would be required by the Expert Committee to critically evaluate the listed substances and make recommendations on their international control, based upon the newly developed "Guidelines for the WHOProgramme for the Review of Psychoactive Substances for International Control".
6.2 From among the 28 substances listed, dimethoxybromoamphetamine (DOB) and thylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA) have been observed to be associated with causing public health and social problems in a number of WHOMember States, and it was recommended that the Director-General should prepare a notification for international control in Schedule I of the convention on Psychotropic Substances.
In the case of the hallucinogen, MDA, which has no known medical use, reports indicate th. t there is evidence of abuse, toxicity and substance-related deaths in Australia, Canada, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America. The presence of MDA in the il licit drug market, evidenced by seizure data, illicit traffic and the discovery of clandestine manufacturing laboratories in a number of countries, including the United States of .America further illustrate the magnitude of the problem this substance presents.
The hallucinogen DOB has no medically accepted use and has been reported to be •• sociated with toxicity, morbidity and mortality. Seizure incidents have also been reported from some countries, including Australia, Sweden, the United Kingdom and the United States of rica.
6.3 The committee further suggested that this report be submitted to the Director-General together with its recommendations about WHOnotifications to the Secr~tary-Generalof the United Nations. It was unanimously agreed that all 28 Hsted .ub stances, including DOB and MDA, be formally reviewed by the next Expert Committee on Drug Dependence, in accordance with the new procedures. MNH/PAD/84.4 page 4
ANNEX1
LIST OF PARTICIPANTS
1. Dr Smail Bouzer,* Deputy Director of Pharmacy, Ministry of Public Health, Algiers, Algeria
2. Dr V. M. Bulaev, Deputy Chief, Department for the Introduction of New Drugs and Medical Technology, Ministry of Health of the USSR, Rahmanovskij per. 3, 1011431 CSP Moscow N-5l, USSR
3. Professor E. A. Carlini, Department of Psychobiology, Paulista School of Medicine, Rue Botucata 862 - 10, Andar 040233, Sao Paulo SP, Brazil
4. Dr W. Keup, Professor of Psychiatry, Jos-Schauer-Strasse 10, 8039 Puchheim, Federal Republic of Germany
5. Dr Jacques G. LeCavalier, Director, Bureau of Dangerous Drugs, Health Protection Branch, ·· Ottawa, Canada
6. Dr o. Ogunremi, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ilorin, P.M.B. 1515, Ilorin, Nigeria (Rapporteur)
7. Professor Bror Rexed, Thomas Heftyes Gate l4C, Oslo 2, Norway (Chairman)
8. Dr C. R. Schuster, Director, Drug Dependence Research Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States of America
9. Dr T. Yanagita, Director, Preclinical Research Laboratories, Central Institute for Experimental Animals, Kawasaki, Japan
REPRESENTATIVESOF OTHER ORGANIZATIONS
United Nations Division of Narcotic Drugs
Mr P. K. Bailey, Chief, Treaty Implementation and Commission Secretariat Section, Unibed Nations Division of Narcotic Drugs, Vienna International Centre, Vienna, Austria
Mr F. Ramos Galino, Deputy Director, United Nations Divison of Narcotic Drugs, Vienna International Centre, Vienna, Austria
International Narcotics Control Board
Hr A. Bahi, Secretary, International Narcotics Control Board, Vienna International Centre, Vienna, Austria International Criminal Police Organization
Mr Helge De Fine, Specialist Officer in charge of Psychotropic Substances, International Criminal Police Organization, 26 rue Armengaud, Saint-Cloud, France
WHOCOLLABORATING CENTRES
National Institute of Drug Abuse
Dr James Cooper, Assistant Director for Medical Affairs, NIDA, Department of Health, Education and Welfare, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockvi11e, Maryland 20857, United States of America
Mr A11an Duncan,* Deputy Associate Commissioner for Health Affairs, FDA, Department of Health, Education and Welfare, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland 20857, United States America
* Invited but unable to attend. MNH/PAD/84.4 page 5
Annex 1 In.tituto Mexicano de Psiquiatria, Mexico*
Health Research Institute, Chulangkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand*
Jational Drug Dependence Clinical Research Centre, Universiti Sains, Penang, Malaysia*
'," 'WHO SECRETARIAT
""~rMichael C. Gerald, Consultant, Division of Mental Health, WHO, Geneva (Co-Rapporteur)
Hr T. Ito, Pharmacist, Division of Mental Health, WHO, Geneva
Or lnayat Khan, Senior Medical Officer, Division of Mental Health, WHO, Geneva (Secretary)
'. Dr Norman Sartorius, Director, Divison of Mental Health, WHO, Geneva
...... ;. ---:----- * Inv1ted. but unable to attend. MNH/PAD/84.4 page 6
ANNEX2
LIST OF SUBSTANCES CONSIDERED BY THE AD HOC CONSULTATIONON ACTION CONCERNING "UNCONTROLLEDAMPHETAMINES"
Geneva, 17 March 1984
1. Cathine (norpseudophedrine) 2. Cathinone 3. C1obenzorex 4. Dimethoxyamphetamine '::" 5. Dimethoxybromoamphetamine (DOB) 6. Eti1amfetamine (ethy1amphetamine) 7. Fenbutrazate 8. Fencamfamine 9. Fenet y11ine 10. Fenproporex 11. Furfenorex 12. Levamfetamine 13. Levomethamphetamine 14. Mefenorex 15. Methoxyamphetamine (PMA) 16. Methy1enedioxyamphetamine (MDA) 17. Morazone 18. para-methoxyamphetamine 19. Pemoline 20. Propy1hexedrine 21. Pyrova1erone 22. Trimethoxyamphetamine (TMA) 23. 4-Bromo-2,5-dimethoxyphenethy1amine 24. 2,5-Dimethoxy-4-ethy1amphetamine (DOET) 25. N,N-Dimethy1amphetamine (dimetamfetamine) 26. N-Ethyl-3,4,Methy1enedioxyamphetamine (N-Ethy1-MDA) 27 . 5-Methoxy-3,4-methy1enedioxyamphetamine (MMDA) 28. 3,4-Methy1enedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) HNH/PAD/84.4 page 7
ANNEX 3
CONTENTSOF THE FILE
1. Note for the Record. Correspondence between Degussa Phama Gruppe and Dr I. Khan
2. Note from Committee on Problems of Drug Dependence, United States of America
3. Review of Uncontrolled Amphetamines for Provisional International Control (MNH/PAD/84.l0) , Dr M. C. Gerald
4. INTERPOL Report - Status of Fenetylline (February 1984)
5. United Nations Division of Narcotic Drugs Report (MNAR/1984/4)
.6. Summary of Substance List. Report from the Government of Canada, Mr J. G. LeCavalier
7. Phenethylamines. Report from National Institute on Drug Abuse, United States of America, Dr J. Cooper
8. Gutachten uber 30 Substanzen der Amphetamin- Reihe, Dr W. Keup