View the PDF Document

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

View the PDF Document POISONS STANDARD 2011 I, ANTHONY GILL, a delegate of the Secretary to the Department of Health and Ageing for the purposes of paragraph 52D(2)(b) of the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 (the Act) and acting in accordance with the Secretary‘s power under that paragraph of the Act, prepare this new Poisons Standard, in substitution for the current Poisons Standard. (signed by) ANTHONY GILL Delegate of the Secretary to the Department of Health and Ageing Dated this 2nd day of August 2011 Federal Register of Legislative Instruments F2011L01612 ii 1. Citation This instrument is the Poisons Standard 2011. 2. The New Poisons Standard The Poisons Standard 2011 consists of the Standard for the Uniform Scheduling of Medicines and Poisons No 2 (the SUSMP 2) as set out in Schedule 1. 3. Commencement The Poisons Standard 2011 commences on the day after registration. Federal Register of Legislative Instruments F2011L01612 iii Schedule 1-Standard for the Uniform Scheduling of Medicines and Poisons No. 2 Federal Register of Legislative Instruments F2011L01612 iv STANDARD FOR THE UNIFORM SCHEDULING OF MEDICINES AND POISONS No. 2 August 2011 Federal Register of Legislative Instruments F2011L01612 © Commonwealth of Australia 2011 ISBN: 978-1-74241-472-0 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Commonwealth. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the: Commonwealth Copyright Administration Attorney-General's Department Robert Garran Offices National Circuit BARTON ACT 2600 or posted at http://www.ag.gov.au/cca Published by the Australian Government under the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989. Publication approval number: D0408 This publication consolidates the previous Standard for the Uniform Scheduling of Medicines and Poisons and the subsequent amendments to that document. It records decisions made by the Secretary of the Australian Department of Health and Ageing, or the Secretary's delegate, with implementation dates up to and including 8 July 2011. The basis of these decisions can be found in the ‗Record of the Reasons‘, which can be accessed from the TGA website: http://www.tga.gov.au/industry/scheduling-decisions-final.htm Further inquiries should be directed to: The Secretary Medicines and Poisons Scheduling Secretariat GPO Box 9848 CANBERRA ACT 2601 Or by email: [email protected] Media Liaison Unit Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing Federal Register of Legislative Instruments F2011L01612 iii CONTENTS INTRODUCTION v PRINCIPLES OF SCHEDULING vii PART 1 INTERPRETATION 2 PART 2 LABELS AND CONTAINERS 10 LABELS 10 General requirements 10 Immediate wrapper 10 Primary packs and immediate containers 10 Statements of quantity, proportion or strength 16 Exemptions 17 Selected containers and measure packs 17 Ampoules, pre-filled syringes and injection vials 18 Transport containers and wrappings 18 Dispensary, industrial, laboratory and manufacturing poisons 19 Exemptions from label requirements in certain circumstances 19 Dispensed medicines 19 Gas cylinders 19 Paints 20 Camphor and naphthalene 20 Prohibitions 20 CONTAINERS 21 Containers for poisons other than Schedule 5 poisons 21 Containers for Schedule 5 poisons 21 Approved containers 22 Child-resistant closures 22 Schedule 8 poisons 24 Exemptions 25 Camphor and naphthalene 25 Prohibitions 25 PART 3 MISCELLANEOUS REGULATIONS 26 Advertising 26 Sale or Supply 26 Schedule 2 poisons 26 Schedule 3 poisons 26 Schedule 4 poisons 26 Schedule 7 poisons 27 Prohibitions on sale, prescribing and possession 27 Storage 28 PART 4 THE SCHEDULES 29 Schedule 1 30 Schedule 2 31 Schedule 3 46 Schedule 4 52 Schedule 5 127 Schedule 6 155 Schedule 7 192 Schedule 8 202 Schedule 9 205 Federal Register of Legislative Instruments F2011L01612 iv PART 5 APPENDICES 211 Appendix A General Exemptions 212 Appendix B Substances considered not to require control by scheduling 215 Appendix C Substances, other than those included in Schedule 9, of such danger to health as to warrant prohibition of sale, supply and use 224 Appendix D Additional Controls on possession or supply of poisons included in Schedule 4 or 8 228 Appendix E First Aid instructions for poisons 230 Appendix F Warning Statements and general safety directions for poisons 247 Appendix G Dilute Preparations 275 Appendix H Schedule 3 poisons permitted to be advertised 276 Appendix I Uniform Paint Standard 277 Appendix J Conditions for availability and use of Schedule 7 poisons 279 Appendix K Drugs required to be labelled with a sedation warning 283 Appendix L Requirements for dispensing labels for human and veterinary medicines 286 Index 288 Federal Register of Legislative Instruments F2011L01612 v INTRODUCTION The Standard for Uniform Scheduling of Medicines and Poisons (the Standard), or SUSMP, is established under Section 52D of the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989, and is a compilation of the decisions made under Section 52D of the same Act. The SUSMP should be read in conjunction with the Scheduling Policy Framework (SPF) of the National Coordinating Committee on Therapeutic Goods. Further information on the scheduling amendments and the SPF can be accessed from the following website: www.tga.gov.au. Refer to Part 1 Interpretation on page 2 below, for definitions of specific terms used in this document including ―medicine‖ and ―poison‖ (noting that the definition of poison includes medicine). The SUSMP serves two key purposes. Firstly, the SUSMP contains the decisions of the delegates regarding the classification of poisons into Schedules, as recommendations to Australian States and Territories. The scheduling classification sets the level of control on the availability of poisons. The scheduling of poisons is implemented through relevant State and Territory legislation. Certain advertising, labelling and packaging requirements may also be a consequence of scheduling but are the subject of other Commonwealth registration schemes. Secondly, the SUSMP includes model provisions for labelling, containers, storage and possession of poisons in general, which are intended to be adopted for use in each jurisdiction of Australia, according to local requirements and local law. Appropriate labelling and container requirements for products, other than therapeutic goods and agricultural and veterinary chemical products, are imposed through adoption of Parts 1, 2 and 3 of the SUSMP into State or Territory legislation. Other government agencies may also impose controls on certain products, for example cosmetics. The requirements for labelling and containers in the SUSMP are intended to integrate with existing legislative instruments for labelling and containers. Advertising, labelling and packaging of therapeutic goods and agricultural and veterinary chemicals are also dealt with through the respective product registration schemes provided for in Commonwealth legislation. Poisons which are packed and sold solely for industrial, manufacturing, laboratory or dispensary use are exempt from all labelling requirements included in the SUSMP as they are covered by the Safe Work Australia National Code of Practice for the Labelling of Workplace Substances1 (the SWA Code). Note, however that this exemption does not extend to controls on supply of these poisons. The SUSMP is presented with a view to promoting uniform: scheduling of poisons throughout Australia; signal headings on labels for poisons throughout Australia; labelling and packaging requirements for poisons throughout Australia; additional controls on the availability and use of poisons in Australia. The various Commonwealth legislative instruments which integrate with the SUSMP include: the Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Code Act 1994 the Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Code Regulations 1995 the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 TGO 65 – Child-resistant packaging for therapeutic goods TGO 69 – General requirements for labels for medicines TGO 80 – Child-Resistant Packaging Requirements for Medicines The Required Advisory Statements for Medicine Labels (RASML) 1The SWA Code (NOHSC:2012 (1994)) can be accessed from www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au Federal Register of Legislative Instruments F2011L01612 vi CLASSIFICATION Poisons are classified according to the Schedules in which they are included. The following is a general description of the Schedules. For the legal definitions, however, it is necessary to check with each relevant State or Territory Authority. Schedule 1. This Schedule is intentionally blank. Schedule 2. Pharmacy Medicine – Substances, the safe use of which may require advice from a pharmacist and which should be available from a pharmacy or, where a pharmacy service is not available, from a licensed person. Schedule 3. Pharmacist Only Medicine – Substances, the safe use of which requires professional advice but which should be available to the public from a pharmacist without a prescription. Schedule 4. Prescription Only Medicine, or Prescription Animal Remedy – Substances, the use or supply of which should be by or on the order of persons permitted by State or Territory legislation to prescribe and should be available from a pharmacist on prescription. Schedule 5. Caution – Substances with a low potential for causing harm, the extent of which can be reduced through the use of appropriate packaging with simple warnings and safety directions on the label. Schedule 6. Poison – Substances with a moderate potential for causing
Recommended publications
  • Toxicidade De Herbicidas Pós- Emergentes Em Cultivares De Feijão-Caupi
    TOXICIDADE DE HERBICIDAS PÓS- EMERGENTES EM CULTIVARES DE FEIJÃO-CAUPI THIAGO REIS PRADO 2016 THIAGO REIS PRADO TOXICIDADE DE HERBICIDAS PÓS-EMERGENTES EM CULTIVARES DE FEIJÃO-CAUPI Dissertação apresentada à Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia, Campus de Vitória da Conquista, para obtenção do título de Mestre em Agronomia. Orientador: Prof. D.Sc.Alcebíades Rebouças São José VITÓRIA DA CONQUISTA BAHIA - BRASIL 2016 P915t Prado, Thiago Reis. Toxicidade de herbicidas pós-emergentes em cultivares de feijão-caupi. / Thiago Reis Prado. 55f. Orientador (a): D.Sc. Alcebíades Rebouças São José. Dissertação (mestrado) – Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia, Programa de Pós-graduação em Agronomia, área de concentração em Fitotecnia. Vitória da Conquista, 2016. Referências: f. 50-55. 1. Vigna unguiculata - Cultivo. 2. Controle químico. 3. Planta daninha. 4. Fitotoxidade. I. São José, Alcebíades Rebouças II. Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Agronomia, área de Concentração em Fitotecnia. III. T. CDD: 633.33 Catalogação na fonte : Juliana Teixeira de Assunção – CRB 5/18 90 UESB – Campus Vitória da Conquista - BA Aos meus pais, Paulo Soares Prado e Maria José Reis Prado, que, sempre dedicados à minha educação e fortes na fé, atuam de forma singular com seus ensinamentos e suas orações. Dedico Agradecimentos A Deus, por iluminar minha vida e guiar por todos os caminhos. Aos meus pais, Paulo Soares Prado e Maria José Reis Prado, pelo amor e por apoiarem sempre as decisões para realização dos meus sonhos. Ao Prof. Dr. Alcebíades Rebouças São José, pela confiança, orientação, compreensão e amizade durante todo o curso do mestrado.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stimulants and Hallucinogens Under Consideration: a Brief Overview of Their Chemistry and Pharmacology
    Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 17 (1986) 107-118 107 Elsevier Scientific Publishers Ireland Ltd. THE STIMULANTS AND HALLUCINOGENS UNDER CONSIDERATION: A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF THEIR CHEMISTRY AND PHARMACOLOGY LOUIS S. HARRIS Dcparlmcnl of Pharmacology, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth Unwersity, Richmond, VA 23298 (U.S.A.) SUMMARY The substances under review are a heterogenous set of compounds from a pharmacological point of view, though many have a common phenylethyl- amine structure. Variations in structure lead to marked changes in potency and characteristic action. The introductory material presented here is meant to provide a set of chemical and pharmacological highlights of the 28 substances under con- sideration. The most commonly used names or INN names, Chemical Abstract (CA) names and numbers, and elemental formulae are provided in the accompanying figures. This provides both some basic information on the substances and a starting point for the more detailed information that follows in the individual papers by contributors to the symposium. Key words: Stimulants, their chemistry and pharmacology - Hallucinogens, their chemistry and pharmacology INTRODUCTION Cathine (Fig. 1) is one of the active principles of khat (Catha edulis). The structure has two asymmetric centers and exists as two geometric isomers, each of which has been resolved into its optical isomers. In the plant it exists as d-nor-pseudoephedrine. It is a typical sympathomimetic amine with a strong component of amphetamine-like activity. The racemic mixture is known generically in this country and others as phenylpropanolamine (dl- norephedrine). It is widely available as an over-the-counter (OTC) anti- appetite agent and nasal decongestant.
    [Show full text]
  • Medicines Regulations 1984 (SR 1984/143)
    Reprint as at 1 July 2014 Medicines Regulations 1984 (SR 1984/143) David Beattie, Governor-General Order in Council At the Government House at Wellington this 5th day of June 1984 Present: His Excellency the Governor-General in Council Pursuant to section 105 of the Medicines Act 1981, and, in the case of Part 3 of the regulations, to section 62 of that Act, His Excellency the Governor-General, acting on the advice of the Minister of Health tendered after consultation with the organisations and bodies that ap- peared to the Minister to be representatives of persons likely to be substantially affected, and by and with the advice and consent of the Executive Council, hereby makes the following regulations. Contents Page 1 Title and commencement 5 Note Changes authorised by subpart 2 of Part 2 of the Legislation Act 2012 have been made in this official reprint. Note 4 at the end of this reprint provides a list of the amendments incorporated. These regulations are administered by the Ministry of Health. 1 Reprinted as at Medicines Regulations 1984 1 July 2014 2 Interpretation 5 Part 1 Classification of medicines 3 Classification of medicines 11 Part 2 Standards 4 Standards for medicines, related products, medical 11 devices, cosmetics, and surgical dressings 5 Pharmacist may dilute medicine in particular case 12 6 Colouring substances [Revoked] 12 Part 3 Advertisements 7 Advertisements not to claim official approval 13 8 Advertisements for medicines 13 9 Advertisements for related products 15 10 Advertisements for medical devices 15 11 Advertisements
    [Show full text]
  • The In¯Uence of Medication on Erectile Function
    International Journal of Impotence Research (1997) 9, 17±26 ß 1997 Stockton Press All rights reserved 0955-9930/97 $12.00 The in¯uence of medication on erectile function W Meinhardt1, RF Kropman2, P Vermeij3, AAB Lycklama aÁ Nijeholt4 and J Zwartendijk4 1Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 2Department of Urology, Leyenburg Hospital, Leyweg 275, 2545 CH The Hague, The Netherlands; 3Pharmacy; and 4Department of Urology, Leiden University Hospital, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands Keywords: impotence; side-effect; antipsychotic; antihypertensive; physiology; erectile function Introduction stopped their antihypertensive treatment over a ®ve year period, because of side-effects on sexual function.5 In the drug registration procedures sexual Several physiological mechanisms are involved in function is not a major issue. This means that erectile function. A negative in¯uence of prescrip- knowledge of the problem is mainly dependent on tion-drugs on these mechanisms will not always case reports and the lists from side effect registries.6±8 come to the attention of the clinician, whereas a Another way of looking at the problem is drug causing priapism will rarely escape the atten- combining available data on mechanisms of action tion. of drugs with the knowledge of the physiological When erectile function is in¯uenced in a negative mechanisms involved in erectile function. The way compensation may occur. For example, age- advantage of this approach is that remedies may related penile sensory disorders may be compen- evolve from it. sated for by extra stimulation.1 Diminished in¯ux of In this paper we will discuss the subject in the blood will lead to a slower onset of the erection, but following order: may be accepted.
    [Show full text]
  • “STOP” and “GO” Pathways for the Treatment of Alcohol Use Disorders
    UCSF UC San Francisco Previously Published Works Title Targeting the intracellular signaling "STOP" and "GO" pathways for the treatment of alcohol use disorders. Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6hd3x2cv Journal Psychopharmacology, 235(6) ISSN 0033-3158 Authors Ron, Dorit Berger, Anthony Publication Date 2018-06-01 DOI 10.1007/s00213-018-4882-z Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Psychopharmacology (2018) 235:1727–1743 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-018-4882-z REVIEW Targeting the intracellular signaling “STOP” and “GO” pathways for the treatment of alcohol use disorders Dorit Ron1 & Anthony Berger1 Received: 18 January 2018 /Accepted: 12 March 2018 /Published online: 14 April 2018 # The Author(s) 2018 Abstract In recent years, research has identified the molecular and neural substrates underlying the transition of moderate “social” con- sumption of alcohol to the characteristic alcohol use disorder (AUD) phenotypes including excessive and compulsive alcohol use which we define in the review as the GO signaling pathways. In addition, growing evidence points to the existence of molecular mechanisms that keep alcohol consumption in check and that confer resilience for the development of AUD which we define herein as the STOP signaling pathways. In this review, we focus on examples of the GO and the STOP intracellular signaling pathways and discuss our current knowledge of how manipulations of these pathways may be used for the treatment of AUD. Keywords Alcohol . Addiction . Signaling . Translation . Medication Development . Fyn . mTOR . BDNF . GDNF Introduction medications such as naltrexone, acamprosate, and disulfiram not only are beneficial but also suffer from efficacy and com- Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is a serious worldwide health prob- pliance issues (Wackernah et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    J. Pharm. Tech. Res. Management Vol. 8, No. 1 (2020), pp.39–46 Vol. 7 | No. 2 | Nov 2019 Journal of Pharmaceutical Technology Research and Management Journal homepage: https://jptrm.chitkara.edu.in/ Ranitidine Induced Hepatotoxicity: A Review Amit Bandyopadhyay Banerjee1, Manisha Gupta2, Thakur Gurjeet Singh3, Sandeep Arora4 and Onkar Bedi5* Chitkara College of Pharmacy, Chitkara University, Punjab-140401, India [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 5*[email protected] (Corresponding Author) ARTICLE INFORMATION ABSTRACT Received: January 29, 2020 Background: Ranitidine (RAN) is one of the common drugs associated with idiosyncratic Revised: April 08, 2020 adverse drug reactions (IADRs) in humans. It was found to be associated with severe adverse drug Accepted: April 28, 2020 reactions due to the presence of contaminants such as N-Nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) which Published Online: May 20, 2020 is claimed to be carcinogenic. As a consequence, on April 1, 2020, United States Food and Drug Keywords: Administration (USFDA) had decided to call off all the RAN products from the market. The exact DILI, Ranitidine withdrawal, RAN induced cause of RAN associated idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity is not clear yet. hepatotoxicity Purpose: To summarize and analyze the reason behind the withdrawal of RAN products from the market and whether ranitidine will be available again in future or will FDA withdraw approvals of ranitidine National Drug Authority (NDA) and an abbreviated new drug application (ANDA)? Methods: We performed a systematic PubMed/MEDLINE search of studies investigating the reason behind the withdrawal of RAN products and explored the possible mechanism associated with RAN induced hepatotoxicity.
    [Show full text]
  • Glucocorticoids with Ketamine and Pentobarbitone- Induced General Anaesthesia in the Rat: Possible Effects on Central Cholinergic Activity
    Br. J. Pharmac. (1984), 82,339-347 Interactions of cholinesterase inhibitors and glucocorticoids with ketamine and pentobarbitone- induced general anaesthesia in the rat: possible effects on central cholinergic activity Remy S. Leeuwin, Jan K. van der Wal & Willem Spanjer Pharmacological Laboratory, University of Amsterdam, Polderweg 104,1093 KP Amsterdam, The Netherlands 1 Doses of 100, 150 and 200 igkg-1 of the cholinesterase inhibitor neostigmine reverse the anaesthetic action of ketamine. The antagonistic effect is increased as the dose is increased. The duration of anaesthesia induced by pentobarbitone is reversed by the cholinesterase inhibitor in doses of 150, 200 and 250 tig kg-1. 2 Choline, in a dose of 50mg kg-, significantly antagonizes the action of the two anaesthetics, whereas hemicholinium-3, an inhibitor of the uptake of choline and the synthesis of acetylcholine, markedly potentiates their action. 3 Dexamethasone induces a significant reduction of the duration of anaesthesia produced by ketamine and pentobarbitone. The potentiation of the anaesthetic effect caused by hemicholinium-3 is also reversed by dexamethasone. 4 The acetylcholine content in rat cerebral cortex is increased after treatment with ketamine and pentobarbitone. 5 Measurements of the course of the plasma level of pentobarbitone do not reveal alterations in the pharmacokinetic profile by either neostigmine or dexamethasone. 6 These results indicate that central cholinergic systems may somehow be involved in the anaesthesia induced by ketamine and pentobarbitone and that the interactions described in this paper may be the result of modification by neostigmine and dexamethasone of the alterations in cholinergic activity caused by the two anaesthetics. Introduction In 1977 Balmer & Wyte showed that physostigmine after completion of the operation was actually pro- antagonized the sedative effects of diazepam and longed.
    [Show full text]
  • (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub
    US 20130289061A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2013/0289061 A1 Bhide et al. (43) Pub. Date: Oct. 31, 2013 (54) METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS TO Publication Classi?cation PREVENT ADDICTION (51) Int. Cl. (71) Applicant: The General Hospital Corporation, A61K 31/485 (2006-01) Boston’ MA (Us) A61K 31/4458 (2006.01) (52) U.S. Cl. (72) Inventors: Pradeep G. Bhide; Peabody, MA (US); CPC """"" " A61K31/485 (201301); ‘4161223011? Jmm‘“ Zhu’ Ansm’ MA. (Us); USPC ......... .. 514/282; 514/317; 514/654; 514/618; Thomas J. Spencer; Carhsle; MA (US); 514/279 Joseph Biederman; Brookline; MA (Us) (57) ABSTRACT Disclosed herein is a method of reducing or preventing the development of aversion to a CNS stimulant in a subject (21) App1_ NO_; 13/924,815 comprising; administering a therapeutic amount of the neu rological stimulant and administering an antagonist of the kappa opioid receptor; to thereby reduce or prevent the devel - . opment of aversion to the CNS stimulant in the subject. Also (22) Flled' Jun‘ 24’ 2013 disclosed is a method of reducing or preventing the develop ment of addiction to a CNS stimulant in a subj ect; comprising; _ _ administering the CNS stimulant and administering a mu Related U‘s‘ Apphcatlon Data opioid receptor antagonist to thereby reduce or prevent the (63) Continuation of application NO 13/389,959, ?led on development of addiction to the CNS stimulant in the subject. Apt 27’ 2012’ ?led as application NO_ PCT/US2010/ Also disclosed are pharmaceutical compositions comprising 045486 on Aug' 13 2010' a central nervous system stimulant and an opioid receptor ’ antagonist.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,394,315 B2 Aicher Et Al
    USOO93943 15B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,394,315 B2 Aicher et al. (45) Date of Patent: Jul.19, 2016 (54) TETRAHYDROI18NAPHTHYRIDINE 6,605,634 B2 8, 2003 Zablocki et al. SULFONAMIDE AND RELATED 6,638,960 B2 10/2003 Assmann et al. 6,683,091 B2 1/2004 Asberomet al. COMPOUNDS FOR USEAS AGONSTS OF 6,828,344 B1 12/2004 Seehra et al. RORY AND THE TREATMENT OF DISEASE 7,084, 176 B2 8, 2006 Morie et al. 7,138.401 B2 11/2006 Kasibhatla et al. (71) Applicant: Lycera Corporation, Ann Arbor, MI 7,329,675 B2 2/2008 Cox et al. 7,420,059 B2 9, 2008 O'Connor et al. (US) 7,482.342 B2 1/2009 D’Orchymont et al. 7,569,571 B2 8/2009 Dong et al. (72) Inventors: Thomas D. Aicher, Ann Arbor, MI (US); 7,696,200 B2 4/2010 Ackermann et al. Peter L. Toogood, Ann Arbor, MI (US); 7,713.996 B2 5/2010 Ackermann et al. Xiao Hu, Northville, MI (US) 7,741,495 B2 6, 2010 Liou et al. 7,799,933 B2 9/2010 Ceccarelli et al. (73) Assignee: Lycera Corporation, Ann Arbor, MI 2006,0004000 A1 1/2006 D'Orchymont et al. 2006/010O230 A1 5, 2006 Bischoff et al. (US) 2007/0010537 A1 1/2007 Hamamura et al. 2007/OO 10670 A1 1/2007 Hirata et al. (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this 2007/0049556 A1 3/2007 Zhang et al. patent is extended or adjusted under 35 2007/0060567 A1 3/2007 Ackermann et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Information
    Supplementary Information Network-based Drug Repurposing for Novel Coronavirus 2019-nCoV Yadi Zhou1,#, Yuan Hou1,#, Jiayu Shen1, Yin Huang1, William Martin1, Feixiong Cheng1-3,* 1Genomic Medicine Institute, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA 2Department of Molecular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA 3Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA #Equal contribution *Correspondence to: Feixiong Cheng, PhD Lerner Research Institute Cleveland Clinic Tel: +1-216-444-7654; Fax: +1-216-636-0009 Email: [email protected] Supplementary Table S1. Genome information of 15 coronaviruses used for phylogenetic analyses. Supplementary Table S2. Protein sequence identities across 5 protein regions in 15 coronaviruses. Supplementary Table S3. HCoV-associated host proteins with references. Supplementary Table S4. Repurposable drugs predicted by network-based approaches. Supplementary Table S5. Network proximity results for 2,938 drugs against pan-human coronavirus (CoV) and individual CoVs. Supplementary Table S6. Network-predicted drug combinations for all the drug pairs from the top 16 high-confidence repurposable drugs. 1 Supplementary Table S1. Genome information of 15 coronaviruses used for phylogenetic analyses. GenBank ID Coronavirus Identity % Host Location discovered MN908947 2019-nCoV[Wuhan-Hu-1] 100 Human China MN938384 2019-nCoV[HKU-SZ-002a] 99.99 Human China MN975262
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1—— IBOGAINE: a REVIEW
    ——Chapter 1—— IBOGAINE: A REVIEW Kenneth R. Alper Departments of Psychiatry and Neurology New York University School of Medicine New York, NY 10016 I. Introduction, Chemical Properties, and Historical Time Line .................................... A. Introduction............................................................................................................ B. Chemical Structure and Properties ........................................................................ C. Historical Time Line.............................................................................................. II. Mechanisms of Action ................................................................................................. A. Neurotransmitter Activities.................................................................................... B. Discrimination Studies........................................................................................... C. Effects on Neuropeptides....................................................................................... D. Possible Effects on Neuroadaptations Related to Drug Sensitization or Tolerance ........................................................................................................... III. Evidence of Efficacy in Animal Models....................................................................... A. Drug Self-Administration ...................................................................................... B. Acute Opioid Withdrawal.....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Us Anti-Doping Agency
    2019U.S. ANTI-DOPING AGENCY WALLET CARDEXAMPLES OF PROHIBITED AND PERMITTED SUBSTANCES AND METHODS Effective Jan. 1 – Dec. 31, 2019 CATEGORIES OF SUBSTANCES PROHIBITED AT ALL TIMES (IN AND OUT-OF-COMPETITION) • Non-Approved Substances: investigational drugs and pharmaceuticals with no approval by a governmental regulatory health authority for human therapeutic use. • Anabolic Agents: androstenediol, androstenedione, bolasterone, boldenone, clenbuterol, danazol, desoxymethyltestosterone (madol), dehydrochlormethyltestosterone (DHCMT), Prasterone (dehydroepiandrosterone, DHEA , Intrarosa) and its prohormones, drostanolone, epitestosterone, methasterone, methyl-1-testosterone, methyltestosterone (Covaryx, EEMT, Est Estrogens-methyltest DS, Methitest), nandrolone, oxandrolone, prostanozol, Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators (enobosarm, (ostarine, MK-2866), andarine, LGD-4033, RAD-140). stanozolol, testosterone and its metabolites or isomers (Androgel), THG, tibolone, trenbolone, zeranol, zilpaterol, and similar substances. • Beta-2 Agonists: All selective and non-selective beta-2 agonists, including all optical isomers, are prohibited. Most inhaled beta-2 agonists are prohibited, including arformoterol (Brovana), fenoterol, higenamine (norcoclaurine, Tinospora crispa), indacaterol (Arcapta), levalbuterol (Xopenex), metaproternol (Alupent), orciprenaline, olodaterol (Striverdi), pirbuterol (Maxair), terbutaline (Brethaire), vilanterol (Breo). The only exceptions are albuterol, formoterol, and salmeterol by a metered-dose inhaler when used
    [Show full text]