Metadata for Semantic and Social Applications

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Metadata for Semantic and Social Applications

Edited by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas

Proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications

Universitätsverlag Göttingen

22-26 September 2008

Jane Greenberg, Wolfgang Klas (Ed.)
Metadata for Semantic and Social Applications

This work is licensed under the
Creative Commons License 2.0 “by-nd”, allowing you to download, distribute and print the document in a few copies for private or educational use, given that the document stays unchanged and the creator is mentioned.
You are not allowed to sell copies of the free version.
Published by Universitätsverlag Göttingen 2008

Metadata for Semantic and Social Applications

Proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications Berlin, 22-26 September 2008

DC 2008: Berlin, Germany

Edited by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas

Published by the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative, Singapore

and

Universitätsverlag Göttingen 2008

Bibliographical information of the German National Library

This publication is recorded by the German National Library; detailed bibliographical data are available here: <http://dnb.ddb.de>

This work is protected by German Intellectual Property Right Law. It is also available as an Open Access version through the publisher’s homepage and the Online Catalogue of the State and University Library of Goettingen (http://www.sub.uni-goettingen.de). Users of the free online version are invited to read, download and distribute it. Users may also print a small number for educational or private use. However they may not sell print versions of the online book.

Typesetting Beate Rabold, Sandra Lechelt, Susanne Dobratz
Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin
Cover Design Mirjam Kessler, German National Library
Manuela Schulze, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Margo Bargheer, Universitätsverlag Göttingen
Production Managament Stefanie Rühle
Niedersächs. Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen

© 2008 Dublin Core Metadata Initative and Universitätsverlag Göttingen http://univerlag.uni-goettingen.de ISBN: 978-3-940344-49-6 ISSN: 1939-1358

Preface

Establishing a standard like Dublin Core is like building a bridge. It makes exchange possible. Fittingly, the Dublin Core conference 2008 is taking place in Berlin, which is often called a bridge between Western and Eastern Europe. This event reaches even beyond Europe, with registered participants from nations all over the world such as United States, South Africa, Japan and New Zealand. This year's conference will focus on metadata for social and semantic applications. For the first time, alongside the English tutorials there will be tutorials in German, prepared and presented by students from the University of Applied Sciences Potsdam. After three days of plenary as well as parallel sessions the conference will close on Friday with four different seminars focussing on interoperability and metadata vocabularies. Organizing such a conference would be impossible without the invaluable help of the following six organizations: the Competence Centre for Interoperable Metadata (KIM), the Max Planck Digital Library (MPDL), the Göttingen State and University Library (SUB), the German National Library (DNB), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (HU Berlin) and the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative (DCMI). For the funding we would like to thank the German Research Foundation (DFG) and the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF). Additionally we would like to thank Elsevier, the Common Library Network GBV, IBM, OCLC and Sun Microsystems for their generous sponsoring. Last but not least, the conference is supported by Wikimedia Deutschland, local support community of Wikipedia, the well-known online encyclopedia. We are sure that this year’s conference will serve as a bridge between the participants and their knowledge, ideas and visions. With sincere wishes for a productive conference,

Heike Neuroth
Niedersächsische Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen on behalf of the DC-2008 Host Organisation Committee

i

Preface

It is with great pleasure that DCMI welcomes participants to DC-2008, the 8th annual International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications to Berlin, Germany. For DCMI, it is also a return to Germany, as we came to Frankfurt in 1999 for one of the last invitational workshops, before the conference cycle began in 2001. A lot has happened since then, most notably the establishment of the Dublin Core Metadata Element Set as ISO standard 15836. Important steps since then include the development of the extended set of DCMI Terms, the DCMI Abstract Model and the Singapore Framework for Dublin Core Application Profiles. Since those days in 1999, the Dublin Core community has grown from a small and committed group of metadata pioneers into a large community of researchers and practitioners, who come together once a year to share experiences, discuss common issues and meet people from across the planet. This year in Berlin, the program has a dual focus, with attention for semantic applications (where the focus is on machine-readable information and co-operation between automated systems) and social applications (where the focus is on co-operation between people). We believe that both forms of co-operation are crucial for enabling the interoperability that is at the heart of our work on Dublin Core metadata.

As usual, we hope that the event in Berlin will help people to gain understanding of approaches and developments in many places around the world, in many application domains and in many languages, and at the same time allow participants to get to know each other and build and extend personal and professional networks. On behalf of DCMI and its many contributors, I would like to wish everybody a very useful and pleasant conference.

Makx Dekkers
Managing Director
Dublin Core Metadata Initiative

ii

Acknowledgements

The DC2008 proceedings represented in the following pages are the end-result of a long process that includes the submission of papers, reports, and posters; reviewing the submissions; organizing the accepted work among themes; and reviewing and formatting the final copies of the accepted works for publication in these proceedings. The process required the input of all members of the Program Committee and the Publications Committee. As conference Co-Chairs, we’d like to thank and acknowledge the efforts of the members of both of these committees, and, in particular, the outstanding and tremendous efforts of Stuart Sutton, Hollie White, Bernhard Haslhofer, Stefanie Rühle, and Susanne Dobratz.

Jane Greenberg, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Wolfgang Klas, Universität Wien
Program Committee Co-Chairs, DC-2008

iii

2008 Proc. Int’l Conf. on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications

Introduction

The 2008 International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications (DC-2008) is the sixteenth Dublin Core workshop, and the eighth full conference program to include peerreviewed scholarly works (Tokyo, 2001; Florence, 2002; Seattle, 2003; Shanghai, 2004; Madrid, 2005; Manzanillo, 2006; and Singapore, 2007). DC-2008 takes place in Berlin, Germany, a vibrant city in which cultural and scientific ideas are exchanged daily among the many sectors of society. Home to some of the world’s most significant libraries and scientific research centers, Berlin is an ideal location for DC-2008, and for further linking the community of researchers, information professionals, and citizens who increasingly work with metadata to support the preservation, discovery, access, use, and re-use of digital information and information associated with physical artifacts. The theme for DC-2008 is “Metadata for Semantic and Social Applications”. Standardized, schema-driven-metadata underlies digital libraries, data repositories, and semantic applications leading toward the Semantic Web. Metadata is also part of the fabric of social computing, which includes the use of wikis, blogs, and tagging. These two trends flow together in applications such as Wikipedia, where authors collectively create structured information that can be extracted and used to enhance access to and use of information sources. The papers in these proceedings address an array of significant metadata issues and questions related to metadata for semantic and social applications. The proceedings include twelve papers that are organized among the following five themes: 1. Dublin Core: Innovation and Moving Forward; 2. Semantic Integration, Linking, and KOS Methods; 3. Metadata Generation: Methods, Profiles, and Models; 4. Metadata Quality; and 5. Tagging and Metadata for Social Networking. The proceedings also include eight reports distributed among the following three themes: 1. Toward the Semantic Web, 2. Metadata Scheme Design, Application, and Use; and 3. Vocabulary Integration and Interoperability. The last part of the proceedings includes twelve extended one-page abstracts capturing key aspects of current research activities. These papers, reports, and poster abstracts present a cross-section of developments in the field of metadata, with particular attention given to several of the most pressing challenges and important successes in the area of semantic and social systems. Their publication serves as a record of the times and provides a permanent body of knowledge upon which we can build over time. We are pleased to have representation of such high quality work and to have had the input and review of an outstanding Program Committee in making the selection for this year’s conference. We are also pleased that the DC-2008 is taking place in Berlin, a city of international culture. Finally, we are honored to have had the opportunity to serve as this year’s Program Committee Co-Chairs and bring you a fine collection of work from our colleagues around the world.

Jane Greenberg, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Wolfgang Klas, Universität Wien
Program Committee Co-Chairs, 2008

iv

Conference Organization

Conference Coordinators

Makx Dekkers, Dublin Core Metadata Initiative Heike Neuroth, Göttingen State University Library/ Max Planck Digital Library Germany

Program Committee Co-Chairs

Jane Greenberg, School of Information and Library Science, University of North Carolina, USA/ SILS Metadata Research Center Wolfgang Klas, Multimedia Information Systems Group, University of Vienna, Austria

Program Committee

Abdus Sattar Chaudhy, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore Aida Slavic, UDC Consortium, The Hague, The Netherlands Alistair Miles Rutherford, Appleton Laboratory, UK Allyson Carlyle, University of Washington, USA Ana Alice, Baptista University of Minho, Portugal Andrew Wilson, National Archives of Australia, AUS Andy Powell, Eduserv Foundation, UK Ann Apps, The University of Manchester, UK Bernhard Haslhofer, University of Vienna, Austria Bernhard Schandl, University of Vienna, Austria Bradley Paul Allen, Siderean Software, Inc., USA Charles McCathie, Nevile Opera, Norway Chris Bizer, Freie Universität Berlin (FU Berlin), Germany Chris Khoo, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore Cristina Pattuelli, Pratt Institute, USA Corey Harper, New York University, USA Dean Kraft, Cornell University Library, USA Diane Ileana Hillmann, Cornell University Library, USA Dion Goh, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore Eric Childress, OCLC, USA Erik Duval, Dept. Computerwetenschappen, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium Eva Mendez, University Carlos III of Madrid, Spain Filiberto F. Martinez-Arellano, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico Gail Hodge, Information International Associates, USA Hollie White, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA Igor Perisic, LinkedIn, USA Jacques Ducloy, Institut de l’Information Scientifique et Technique, France Jane Hunter, University of Queensland, AUS Jian Qin, Syracuse University, USA John Kunze; California Digital Library, USA Joseph A. Busch, Taxonomy Strategies LLC, USA Joseph Tennis, University of Washington, USA Juha Hakala, Helsinki University Library - The National Library of Finland, Finland Kathy Wisser, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA Leif Andresen, Danish Library Agency, Denmark Liddy Nevile, Dep. of Computer Science & Computer Engineering, La Trobe University, AUS Marcy Lei Zeng, Kent State University, USA Michael Crandall, University of Washington, USA

v
Miguel-Angel Sicilla, University of Alcala, Spain Mikael Nilsson, Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden Mitsuharu Nagamori, University of Tsukuba, Japan Paul Miller, Talis, UK Pete Johnston, Eduserv Foundation, UK Sandy Roe, Illinois State University, USA Sebastian R. Kruk, DERI Galway, Ireland Shigeo Sugimoto, University of Tsukuba, Japan Stefanie Rühle, Research & Development Department, Göttingen State University Library, GERMANY Stuart A. Sutton, University of Washington, USA Stuart Weibel, OCLC, USA Tom Baker, Research & Development Department, Göttingen State University Library, Germany Traugott Koch, Max Planck Digital Library, Germany Wei Liu, Shanghai Library, China William E. Moen, University of North Texas (UNT), USA

Workshop Committee

Makx Dekkers, Dublin Core Metadata Initiative

Tutorial Committee

Achim Oßwald, Institute of Information Science, University of Applied Sciences, Germany John Roberts, Archives Management, New Zealand

Publications Committee

Susanne Dobratz, (Co-Chair), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany Stefanie Rühle, (Co-Chair), Göttingen State University Library, Germany Patrick Danowski, WikiMedia, Germany Sandra Lechelt, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany Beate Rabold, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany Hollie White, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA

Publicity Committee

Mirjam Keßler (Chair), German National Library Frankfurt, Germany Monika Nisslein, Max Planck Digital Library, Germany Cornelia Reindl, Max Planck Digital Library, Germany

Host Organisation Committee

Laurent Romary, Max Planck Digital Library, Germany Michael Seadle, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany Reinhard Altenhöner, German National Library Frankfurt, Germany Stefanie Rühle, Göttingen State University Library, Germany

assisted by

Peggy Beßler; Malte Dreyer; Susanne Dobratz; Stefan Farrenkopf; Christine Frodl; Katrin Gashi; Elke Greifeneder; Justine Haeberli; Rupert Kiefl; Traugott Koch; Matthias Schulz; Ulla Tschida; Andre Wobst

vi

CONTENTS

PAPER SESSION 1 DUBLIN CORE: INNOVATION AND MOVING FORWARD

Encoding Application Profiles in a Computational Model of the Crosswalk .................................3

Carol Jean Godby, Devon Smith & Eric Childress

Relating Folksonomies with Dublin Core .....................................................................................14

Maria Elisabete Catarino & Ana Alice Baptista

PAPER SESSION 2 SEMANTIC INTEGRATION, LINKING, AND KOS METHODS

LCSH, SKOS and Linked Data .................................................................................................... 25

Ed Summers, Antoine Isaac, Clay Redding & Dan Krech

Theme Creation for Digital Collections ........................................................................................34

Xia Lin, Jiexun Li & Xiaohua Zhou

Comparing Human and Automatic Thesaurus Mapping Approaches in the Agricultural Domain ......................................................................................................................43

Boris Lauser, Gudrun Johannsen, Caterina Caracciolo, Johannes Keizer, Willem Robert van Hage & Philipp Mayr

PAPER SESSION 3 METADATA GENERATION:

METHODS, PROFILES, AND MODELS

Automatic Metadata Extraction from Museum Specimen Labels ................................................57

P. Bryan Heidorn & Qin Wei

Achievement Standards Network (ASN): An Application Profile for Mapping K-12 Educational Resources to Achievement Standards ..............................................................69

Stuart A. Sutton & Diny Golder

Collection/Item Metadata Relationships .......................................................................................80

Allen H. Renear, Richard J. Urban, Karen M. Wickett, David Dubin & Sarah L. Shreeves

PAPER SESSION 4 METADATA QUALITY

Answering the Call for more Accountability: Applying Data Profiling to Museum Metadata ....93

Seth van Hooland, Yves Bontemps & Seth Kaufman

A Conceptual Framework for Metadata Quality Assessment .....................................................104

Thomas Margaritopoulos, Merkourios Margaritopoulos,   Ioannis Mavridis & Athanasios Manitsaris

PAPER SESSION 5 TAGGING AND METADATA FOR SOCIAL NETWORKING

Semantic Relation Extraction from Socially-Generated Tags: A Methodology for Metadata Generation .................................................................................................................................. 117

Miao Chen, Xiaozhong Liu & Jian Qin

The State of the Art in Tag Ontologies: A Semantic Model for Tagging and Folksonomies ... 128

Hak Lae Kim, Simon Scerri, John G. Breslin, Stefan Decker & Hong Gee Kim

PROJECT REPORT SESSION 1 TOWARD THE SEMANTIC WEB

DCMF: DC & Microformats, a Good Marriage ......................................................................... 141

Eva Méndez, Leandro M. López, Arnau Siches & Alejandro G. Bravo

Making a Library Catalogue Part of the Semantic Web ............................................................. 146

Martin Malmsten

PROJECT REPORT SESSION 2 METADATA SCHEME DESIGN, APPLICATION, AND USE

The Dryad Data Repository: A Singapore Framework Metadata Architecture in a DSpace Environment ............................................................................................................................... 157

Hollie C. White, Sarah Carrier, Abbey Thompson, Jane Greenberg & Ryan Scherle

Applying DCMI Elements to Digital Images and Text in the Archimedes Palimpsest Program .................................................................................................................... 163

Michael B. Toth & Doug Emery

Assessing Descriptive Substance in Free-Text Collection-Level Metadata................................ 169

Oksana Zavalina, Carole L. Palmer, Amy S. Jackson & Myung-Ja Han

PROJECT REPORT SESSION 3 VOCABULARY INTEGRATION AND INTEROPERABILITY

Building a Terminology Network for Search: The KoMoHe project.......................................... 177

Philipp Mayr & Vivien Petras

Cool URIs for the DDC: Towards Web-Scale Accessibility of a Large Classification System.. 183

Michael Panzer

The Specification of the Language of the Field and Interoperability: Cross-language Access to Catalogues and Online Libraries (CACAO) .................................... 191

Barbara Levergood, Stefan Farrenkopf & Elisabeth Frasnelli

POSTER ABSTRACTS

Implementation of Rich Metadata Formats and Semantic Tools using DSpace ........................ 199

Imma Subirats, ARD Prasad, Johannes Keizer & Andrew Bagdanov

SKOS for an Integrated Vocabulary Structure.............................................................................200

Marcia L. Zeng, Wei Fan & Xia Lin

Exploring Evolutionary Biologists’ Use and Perceptions of Semantic Metadata for Data Curation ........................................................................................202

Hollie C. White

LCSH is to Thesaurus as Doorbell is to Mammal: Visualizing Structural Problems in the Library of Congress Subject Headings ............................................................................. 203

Simon Spero

Metadata in an Ecosystem of Presentation Dissemination...........................................................204

R. John Robertson, Phil Barker & Mahendra Mahey

A Comparison of Social Tagging Designs and User Participation ..............................................205

Caitlin M. Bentley & Patrick R. Labelle

The Data Documentation Initiative (DDI) .................................................................................. 206

Joachim Wackerow

junii2 and AIRway - an Application Profile for Scholarly Works and Its Application for Link Resolvers........................................................................................................................207

Kunie Horikoshi, Yuji Nonaka, Satsuki Kamiya, Shigeki Sugita, Haruo Asoshina & Izumi Sugita

Open Identification and Linking of the Four Ws .........................................................................208

Ryan Shaw & Michael Buckland

Web 2.0 Semantic Systems: Collaborative Learning in Science ................................................ 209

Michael Shoffner, Jane Greenberg, Jacob Kramer-Duffield & David Woodbury

Doing the LibraryThing™ in an Academic Library Catalog .......................................................211

Christine DeZelar-Tiedman

Applying DC to Institutional Data Repositories ..........................................................................212

Robin Rice

AUTHOR INDEX......................................................................................................... 213 SUBJECT INDEX ....................................................................................................... 215

Proc. Int’l Conf. on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications 2008

Full Papers Session 1:

Dublin Core: Innovation and
Moving Forward

1

2008 Proc. Int’l Conf. on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications

Recommended publications
  • Provenance and Annotations for Linked Data

    Provenance and Annotations for Linked Data

    Proc. Int’l Conf. on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications 2013 Provenance and Annotations for Linked Data Kai Eckert University of Mannheim, Germany [email protected] Abstract Provenance tracking for Linked Data requires the identification of Linked Data resources. Annotating Linked Data on the level of single statements requires the identification of these statements. The concept of a Provenance Context is introduced as the basis for a consistent data model for Linked Data that incorporates current best-practices and creates identity for every published Linked Dataset. A comparison of this model with the Dublin Core Abstract Model is provided to gain further understanding, how Linked Data affects the traditional view on metadata and to what extent our approach could help to mediate. Finally, a linking mechanism based on RDF reification is developed to annotate single statements within a Provenance Context. Keywords: Provenance; Annotations; RDF; Linked Data; DCAM; DM2E; 1. Introduction This paper addresses two challenges faced by many Linked Data applications: How to provide, access, and use provenance information about the data; and how to enable data annotations, i.e., further statements about the data, subsets of the data, or even single statements. Both challenges are related as both require the existence of identifiers for the data. We use the Linked Data infrastructure that is currently developed in the DM2E project as an example with typical use- cases and resulting requirements. 1.1. Foundations Linked Data, the publication of data on the Web, enables easy access to data and supports the reuse of data. The Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) is used to access a Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) and to retrieve data about the resource.
  • From the Semantic Web to Social Machines

    From the Semantic Web to Social Machines

    ARTICLE IN PRESS ARTINT:2455 JID:ARTINT AID:2455 /REV [m3G; v 1.23; Prn:25/11/2009; 12:36] P.1 (1-6) Artificial Intelligence ••• (••••) •••–••• Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Artificial Intelligence www.elsevier.com/locate/artint From the Semantic Web to social machines: A research challenge for AI on the World Wide Web ∗ Jim Hendler a, , Tim Berners-Lee b a Tetherless World Constellation, RPI, United States b Computer Science and AI Laboratory, MIT, United States article info abstract Article history: The advent of social computing on the Web has led to a new generation of Web Received 24 September 2009 applications that are powerful and world-changing. However, we argue that we are just Received in revised form 1 October 2009 at the beginning of this age of “social machines” and that their continued evolution and Accepted 1 October 2009 growth requires the cooperation of Web and AI researchers. In this paper, we show how Available online xxxx the growing Semantic Web provides necessary support for these technologies, outline the challenges we see in bringing the technology to the next level, and propose some starting places for the research. © 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Much has been written about the profound impact that the World Wide Web has had on society. Yet it is primarily in the past few years, as more interactive “read/write” technologies (e.g. Wikis, blogs and photo/video sharing) and social network- ing sites have proliferated, that the truly profound nature of this change is being felt. From the very beginning, however, the Web was designed to create a network of humans changing society empowered using this shared infrastructure.
  • Rdfa in XHTML: Syntax and Processing Rdfa in XHTML: Syntax and Processing

    Rdfa in XHTML: Syntax and Processing Rdfa in XHTML: Syntax and Processing

    RDFa in XHTML: Syntax and Processing RDFa in XHTML: Syntax and Processing RDFa in XHTML: Syntax and Processing A collection of attributes and processing rules for extending XHTML to support RDF W3C Recommendation 14 October 2008 This version: http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-rdfa-syntax-20081014 Latest version: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax Previous version: http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/PR-rdfa-syntax-20080904 Diff from previous version: rdfa-syntax-diff.html Editors: Ben Adida, Creative Commons [email protected] Mark Birbeck, webBackplane [email protected] Shane McCarron, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc. [email protected] Steven Pemberton, CWI Please refer to the errata for this document, which may include some normative corrections. This document is also available in these non-normative formats: PostScript version, PDF version, ZIP archive, and Gzip’d TAR archive. The English version of this specification is the only normative version. Non-normative translations may also be available. Copyright © 2007-2008 W3C® (MIT, ERCIM, Keio), All Rights Reserved. W3C liability, trademark and document use rules apply. Abstract The current Web is primarily made up of an enormous number of documents that have been created using HTML. These documents contain significant amounts of structured data, which is largely unavailable to tools and applications. When publishers can express this data more completely, and when tools can read it, a new world of user functionality becomes available, letting users transfer structured data between applications and web sites, and allowing browsing applications to improve the user experience: an event on a web page can be directly imported - 1 - How to Read this Document RDFa in XHTML: Syntax and Processing into a user’s desktop calendar; a license on a document can be detected so that users can be informed of their rights automatically; a photo’s creator, camera setting information, resolution, location and topic can be published as easily as the original photo itself, enabling structured search and sharing.
  • Using RSS to Spread Your Blog

    Using RSS to Spread Your Blog

    10_588486 ch04.qxd 3/4/05 11:33 AM Page 67 Chapter 4 Using RSS to Spread Your Blog In This Chapter ᮣ Understanding just what a blog is ᮣ Creating the blog and the feed ᮣ Using your RSS reader ᮣ Creating a blog using HTML ᮣ Maintaining your blog ᮣ Publicizing your blog with RSS hat’s a blog, after all? Blog, short for Web log, is just a Web site with Wa series of dated entries, with the most recent entry on top. Those entries can contain any type of content you want. Blogs typically include links to other sites and online articles with the blogger’s reactions and com- ments, but many blogs simply contain the blogger’s own ramblings. Unquestionably, the popularity of blogging has fueled the expansion of RSS feeds. According to Technorati, a company that offers a search engine for blogs in addition to market research services, about one-third of blogs have RSS feeds. Some people who maintain blogs are publishing an RSS feed with- out even knowing about it, because some of the blog Web sites automatically create feeds (more about how this happens shortly). If you think that blogs are only personal affairs, remember that Microsoft has hundreds of them, and businesses are using them more and more to keep employees, colleagues, and customersCOPYRIGHTED up to date. MATERIAL In this chapter, I give a quick overview of blogging and how to use RSS with your blog to gain more readers. If you want to start a blog, this chapter explains where to go next.
  • A New Generation Digital Content Service for Cultural Heritage Institutions

    A New Generation Digital Content Service for Cultural Heritage Institutions

    A New Generation Digital Content Service for Cultural Heritage Institutions Pierfrancesco Bellini, Ivan Bruno, Daniele Cenni, Paolo Nesi, Michela Paolucci, and Marco Serena Distributed Systems and Internet Technology Lab, DISIT, Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell’Informazione, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Italy [email protected] http://www.disit.dsi.unifi.it Abstract. The evolution of semantic technology and related impact on internet services and solutions, such as social media, mobile technologies, etc., have de- termined a strong evolution in digital content services. Traditional content based online services are leaving the space to a new generation of solutions. In this paper, the experience of one of those new generation digital content service is presented, namely ECLAP (European Collected Library of Artistic Perform- ance, http://www.eclap.eu). It has been partially founded by the European Commission and includes/aggregates more than 35 international institutions. ECLAP provides services and tools for content management and user network- ing. They are based on a set of newly researched technologies and features in the area of semantic computing technologies capable of mining and establishing relationships among content elements, concepts and users. On this regard, ECLAP is a place in which these new solutions are made available for inter- ested institutions. Keywords: best practice network, semantic computing, recommendations, automated content management, content aggregation, social media. 1 Introduction Traditional library services in which the users can access to content by searching and browsing on-line catalogues obtaining lists of references and sporadically digital items (documents, images, etc.) are part of our history. With the introduction of web2.0/3.0, and thus of data mining and semantic computing, including social media and mobile technologies most of the digital libraries and museum services became rapidly obsolete and were constrained to rapidly change.
  • Introduction to Web 2.0 Technologies

    Introduction to Web 2.0 Technologies

    Introduction to Web 2.0 Joshua Stern, Ph.D. Introduction to Web 2.0 Technologies What is Web 2.0? Æ A simple explanation of Web 2.0 (3 minute video): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0LzQIUANnHc&feature=related Æ A complex explanation of Web 2.0 (5 minute video): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsa5ZTRJQ5w&feature=related Æ An interesting, fast-paced video about Web.2.0 (4:30 minute video): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NLlGopyXT_g Web 2.0 is a term that describes the changing trends in the use of World Wide Web technology and Web design that aim to enhance creativity, secure information sharing, increase collaboration, and improve the functionality of the Web as we know it (Web 1.0). These have led to the development and evolution of Web-based communities and hosted services, such as social-networking sites (i.e. Facebook, MySpace), video sharing sites (i.e. YouTube), wikis, blogs, etc. Although the term suggests a new version of the World Wide Web, it does not refer to any actual change in technical specifications, but rather to changes in the ways software developers and end- users utilize the Web. Web 2.0 is a catch-all term used to describe a variety of developments on the Web and a perceived shift in the way it is used. This shift can be characterized as the evolution of Web use from passive consumption of content to more active participation, creation and sharing. Web 2.0 Websites allow users to do more than just retrieve information.
  • Standardized Classification, Folksonomies, and Ontological Politics

    Standardized Classification, Folksonomies, and Ontological Politics

    UCLA InterActions: UCLA Journal of Education and Information Studies Title Burning Down the Shelf: Standardized Classification, Folksonomies, and Ontological Politics Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/74p477pz Journal InterActions: UCLA Journal of Education and Information Studies, 4(1) ISSN 1548-3320 Author Lau, Andrew J. Publication Date 2008-02-08 DOI 10.5070/D441000621 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Colonialism has left its indelible mark on the world: cultures denied, traditions altered or erased, narratives ignored—all under the guise of noble, and perhaps sincere, intentions of spreading civility among “heathens” and the “wretched.” Power and authority have been assumed with little regard for the conquered as their voices have been disavowed, discounted as subhuman. Societal structures have been implemented as ideal solutions to the perceived inferiority of indigenous societal structures; language, culture, and traditions of a conqueror have been imposed on the conquered, an ontology imposed on another, despite cultural incongruence, and in consequence of power assumed by one over another. The colonized have been classified as the “others,” as “uncivilized,” as “ungodly in need of saving.” This has been the experience of China and Korea at the hands of Japan; the Philippines at the hands of Spain; India, Burma, and Singapore at the hands of Britain; and countless others throughout history. While the example of colonialism may be extreme as a metaphor for ontology, it still serves as a compelling metaphor; colonialism alludes to structures of power, as does an ontology imposing itself on another. In hindsight, history has revealed the terrors and consequences of colonialism, including loss of culture, loss of life, and loss of heritage.
  • A Comparison of Information Seeking Using Search Engines and Social Networks

    A Comparison of Information Seeking Using Search Engines and Social Networks

    A Comparison of Information Seeking Using Search Engines and Social Networks Meredith Ringel Morris1, Jaime Teevan1, Katrina Panovich2 1Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA, USA, 2Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA {merrie, teevan}@microsoft.com, [email protected] Abstract et al. 2009 or Groupization by Morris et al. 2008). Social The Web has become an important information repository; search engines can also be devised using the output of so- often it is the first source a person turns to with an informa- cial tagging systems such as delicious (delicious.com). tion need. One common way to search the Web is with a Social search also encompasses active requests for help search engine. However, it is not always easy for people to from the searcher to other people. Evans and Chi (2008) find what they are looking for with keyword search, and at describe the stages of the search process when people tend times the desired information may not be readily available to interact with others. Morris et al. (2010) surveyed Face- online. An alternative, facilitated by the rise of social media, is to pose a question to one‟s online social network. In this book and Twitter users about situations in which they used paper, we explore the pros and cons of using a social net- a status message to ask questions of their social networks. working tool to fill an information need, as compared with a A well-studied type of social searching behavior is the search engine. We describe a study in which 12 participants posting of a question to a Q&A site (e.g., Harper et al.
  • Metod Иностранный Язык ПЗ 38.02.04 2019

    Metod Иностранный Язык ПЗ 38.02.04 2019

    МИНИCTEPCTBO НАУКИ И ВЫСШЕГО ОБРАЗОВАНИЯ РОССИЙСКОЙ ФЕДЕРАЦИИ Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «СЕВЕРО-КАВКАЗСКИЙ ФЕДЕРАЛЬНЫЙ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ» Институт сервиса, туризма и дизайна (филиал) СКФУ в г. Пятигорске Колледж Института сервиса, туризма и дизайна (филиал) СКФУ в г. Пятигорске Иностранный язык МЕТОДИЧЕСКИЕ УКАЗАНИЯ ДЛЯ ПРАКТИЧЕСКИХ ЗАНЯТИЙ Специальность СПО 38.02.04 Коммерция (по отраслям) Квалификация: Менеджер по продажам Пятигорск 2019 Методические указания для практических занятий по дисциплине «Иностранный язык» составлены в соответствии с требованиями ФГОС СПО, предназначены для студентов, обучающихся по специальности: 38.02.04 Коммерция (по отраслям) Рассмотрено на заседании ПЦК колледжа ИСТиД (филиал) СКФУ в г. Пятигорске Протокол № 9 от «08» апреля 2019г. 2 Пояснительная записка Программа учебной дисциплины по иностранному языку является частью основной профессиональной образовательной программы в соответствии с ФГОС по специальности 38.02.04 Коммерция (по отраслям) Дисциплина входит в общий гуманитарный и социально – экономический цикл профессиональной подготовки. В результате освоения учебной дисциплины обучающийся должен уметь: говорение – вести диалог (диалог–расспрос, диалог–обмен мнениями/суждениями, диалог–побуждение к действию, этикетный диалог и их комбинации) в ситуациях официального и неофициального общения в бытовой, социокультурной и учебно-трудовой сферах, используя аргументацию, эмоционально-оценочные средства; – рассказывать, рассуждать в связи с изученной
  • Al-Mudej Warns Firms Amid Fears of Price Rise Min

    Al-Mudej Warns Firms Amid Fears of Price Rise Min

    SUBSCRIPTION SATURDAY, JANUARY 3, 2015 RABI ALAWWAL 12, 1436 AH No: 16391 Interior ministry Cuomo, a giant Gerrard to leave cracks down on in NY, liberal Liverpool, reckless4 drivers politics,14 dies head48 abroad Al-Mudej warns firms amid fears of price rise Min 07º 150 Fils Kuwait companies jack up prices as diesel subsidies go Max 23º By A Saleh & Agencies KUWAIT: Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Commerce and Industry Abdulmohsen Al- Mudej warned construction companies against jacking up prices of their commodities under the pretext that the government lifted diesel subsidy. “We have noticed that some compa- nies are raising the prices of their materials. Raising the prices of commodities under the pretext of diesel subsidy cut is unjustifiable,” Al- Mudej said Thursday, noting that diesel subsidy cut will not apply on local factories. In a quick reaction to the government’s deci- sion to increase diesel prices by the beginning of 2015, many local construction companies immediately informed their clients that they have increased the prices of their materials even without notifying the ministry of commerce and industry. Some local ready-mix companies increased prices by KD 3.5/KD4.5 per cubic meter of con- crete blaming the increase on cut in diesel sub- sidy. Taking cue from the construction compa- TRIPOLI: People carry the coffin of Lebanon’s first post-war prime minister, Omar Karame, nies, water tanker and sand suppliers also during his funeral in the northern coastal city of Tripoli yesterday. The former prime min- increased prices by up to 100 per cent, said ister and staunch ally of the Syrian government has died at the age of 80.
  • Enterprise Data Classification Using Semantic Web Technologies

    Enterprise Data Classification Using Semantic Web Technologies

    Enterprise Data Classification Using Semantic Web Technologies David Ben-David1, Tamar Domany2, and Abigail Tarem2 1 Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel [email protected] 2 IBM Research – Haifa, University Campus, Haifa 31905, Israel {tamar,abigailt}@il.ibm.com Abstract. Organizations today collect and store large amounts of data in various formats and locations. However they are sometimes required to locate all instances of a certain type of data. Good data classification allows marking enterprise data in a way that enables quick and efficient retrieval of information when needed. We introduce a generic, automatic classification method that exploits Semantic Web technologies to assist in several phases in the classification process; defining the classification requirements, performing the classification and representing the results. Using Semantic Web technologies enables flexible and extensible con- figuration, centralized management and uniform results. This approach creates general and maintainable classifications, and enables applying se- mantic queries, rule languages and inference on the results. Keywords: Semantic Techniques, RDF, Classification, modeling. 1 Introduction Organizations today collect and store large amounts of data in various formats and locations. The data is then consumed in many places, sometimes copied or cached several times, causing valuable and sensitive business information to be scattered across many enterprise data stores. When an organization is required to meet certain legal or regulatory requirements, for instance to comply with regulations or perform discovery during civil litigation, it becomes necessary to find all the places where the required data is located. For example, if in order to comply with a privacy regulation an organization is required to mask all Social Security Numbers (SSN) when delivering personal information to unauthorized entities, all the occurrences of SSN must be found.
  • A Federated Search and Social Recommendation Widget

    A Federated Search and Social Recommendation Widget

    A Federated Search and Social Recommendation Widget Sten Govaerts1 Sandy El Helou2 Erik Duval3 Denis Gillet4 Dept. Computer Science1,3 REACT group2,4 Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Ecole Polytechnique Fed´ erale´ de Lausanne Celestijnenlaan 200A, Heverlee, Belgium 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland fsten.govaerts1, [email protected] fsandy.elhelou2, denis.gillet4g@epfl.ch ABSTRACT are very useful, but their generality can sometimes be an ob- This paper presents a federated search and social recommen- stacle and this can make it difficult to know where to search dation widget. It describes the widget’s interface and the un- for the needed information [2]. Federated searching over derlying social recommendation engine. A preliminary eval- collections of topic-specific repositories can assist with this uation of the widget’s usability and usefulness involving 15 and save time. When the user sends a search request, the subjects is also discussed. The evaluation helped identify us- federated search widget collects relevant resources from dif- ability problems that will be addressed prior to the widget’s ferent social media sites [3], repositories and search engines. usage in a real learning context. Before rendering aggregated results, the widget calls a per- sonalized social recommendation service deemed as crucial Author Keywords in helping users select relevant resources especially in our federated search, social recommendations, widget, Web, per- information overload age [4,5]. The recommendation ser- sonal learning environment (PLE), Pagerank, social media, vice ranks these resources according to their global popu- Web 2.0 larity and most importantly their popularity within the social network of the target user. Ranks are computed by exploiting attention metadata and social networks in the widget.