2020 ISP Conference Program Book (Click)
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Beyond the Established Norms: a New Kind of Union Activism
BEYOND THE ESTABLISHED NORMS: A NEW KIND OF UNION ACTIVISM LOCAL 3 • AFL-CIO Philadelphia Federation of Teachers Health & Welfare Fund’s Professional Development 1974-2014 PFT HEALTH & WELFARE FUND AND TEMPLE UNIVERSITY The PFT Health & Welfare Fund’s ER&D program and Temple Univer- sity worked together to provide PFT members with three graduate level courses to improve their effectiveness in the classroom. The courses offered were Beginning Reading Instruction, Foundations for Effective Teaching and Managing Student Behavior. The Fund acknowledges the following members of the Educational Issues PARTNERSHIP WITH CHEYNEY UNIVERSITY team for their role in the creation of Beyond the Established Norms: Camina Ceasar, Sandra Dunham, Marcia Hinton, Joyce Jones, Rosalind Jones Johnson, In 2008, the PFT Health & Welfare Fund and Cheyney University worked together to provide Philadel- phia teachers with high quality, peer-led professional development at Cheyney University’s urban cam- and Linda Whitaker. pus in Philadelphia. CHEYNEY UNIVERSITY PARTNERSHIP Rosalind Jones Johnson, keynote speaker for Cheyney University’s graduation hooding ceremony joins Dr. Michelle Vitale, President of Cheyney University and Dr. John Williams, Dean of Graduate Studies. Published January 2015 59 Table of Contents History Introduction . 4 Programs for Teaching Annual Conference . 6 QuEST Schools . 8 Philadelphia QuEST Professional Development . 12 Pennsylvania Department of Education Act 48 Provider . 13 Customized Professional Development . 13 On-Site School Support . 14 ER&D (Educational Research and Dissemination) . 16 New Unionism . 20 PFT Health & Welfare Fund and Cheyney University of Pennsylvania Collaborative . 20 PFT Health & Welfare Fund Did Not Get the Credit it Deserved . 23 Programs Philadelphia QuEST Reading Recovery . -
School Cluster List
APPENDIX G: SCHOOL CLUSTERS Providers may use the updated grid, along with public and charter school enrollment numbers and prior average utilization of behavioral health services, to estimate number and types of staff needed to adequately meet the needs of children in their clusters of interest. School enrollment information can be found at the School District of Philadelphia website here. Based on prior year utilization of behavioral health services, providers may calculate 2-7% of the total enrollment as an estimate of the number of children participating in behavioral health treatment. Providers may apply the 2% to “Model” schools, 4% to “Reinforce” schools, and 7% to “Watch” and “Intervene” schools. Please note that prior utilization is not a guarantee of future utilization. Charter schools are marked in red italics. Region 1 Cluster ZIP Code Level Grade Band Climate Score Elementary and Middle Schools Carnell, Laura H. 1 19111 Elem K to 5 Intervene Fox Chase 1 19111 Elem K to 5 Model Moore, J. Hampton School 1 19111 Elem K to 5 Model Crossan, Kennedy C. School 1 19111 Elem K to 5 Reinforce Wilson, Woodrow Middle School 1 19111 Middle 6 to 8 Reinforce Mathematics, Science & Technology II-MaST II Rising Sun 1 19111 Elem K to 4 Tacony Academy Charter School - Am. Paradigm 1 19111 Elem-Mid K to 8 Holme, Thomas School 2 19114 Elem K to 6 Reinforce Hancock, John Demonstration School 2 19114 Elem-Mid K to 8 Reinforce Comly, Watson School 2 19116 Elem K to 5 Model Loesche, William H. School 2 19116 Elem K to 5 Model Fitzpatrick, A. -
Resolution Summary
Final SCHOOL REFORM COMMISSION PUBLIC MEETING RESOLUTION SUMMARY JANUARY 19, 2017 I. SCHOOL REFORM COMMISSION SRC-1 (PRESENTED FOR REVIEW DECEMBER 15, 2016) Proposed Adoption of Policies #105.1 – Curriculum Review by Parents/Guardians and Students, #107 – Adoption of Planned Instruction, 113 – Special Education, #113.1 Discipline of Students with Disabilities, #113.2 – Behavior Support, #113.3 – Screening and Evaluations for Students with Disabilities, #113.4 – Confidentiality of Special Education Student Information, #122 – Extracurricular Activities, #123 – Interscholastic Athletics, #123.1 Concussion Management, #123.2 – Sudden Cardiac Arrest, #805.1 – Relations with Law Enforcement Agencies RESOLVED, that the School Reform Commission hereby adopts the following SRC Policies, in the forms attached, effective January 20, 2017: Policy 105.1 – Curriculum Review by Parents/Guardians and Students Policy 113.2 – Behavior Support Policy 113.4 – Confidentiality of Special Education Student Information Policy 123.1 – Concussion Management Policy 123.2 – Sudden Cardiac Arrest Policy 805.1 – Relations with Law Enforcement Agencies; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, that the School Reform Commission hereby adopts amendments to the following SRC Policies, in the forms attached, effective January 20, 2017: Policy 107 – Adoption of Planned Instruction Policy 113 – Special Education Policy 113.1 – Discipline of Students with Disabilities Policy 113.3 – Screening and Evaluations for Students with Disabilities Policy 122 – Extracurricular Activities Policy 123 – Interscholastic Athletics Description: The School Reform Commission establishes general parameters in which the daily operations of the School District are to be governed. As such, the policies (listed above and attached) have been revised and updated to align with current local, state and federal law. -
User Guide 2018-2019 School Progress Report User Guide
2018-2019 SCHOOL PROGRESS REPORT User Guide 2018-2019 School Progress Report User Guide Welcome This guide is intended to help you understand the various components that make up the SPR and will cover the following topics: Topic Content Page SPR Components This section provides an overview of the SPR layout and its main 3 & Scoring Overview components. It also provides details on how each metric and domain are scored. Report Types There are four SPR report types. This section explains how a 7 school's report type is determined. Domains The SPR is organized into four domains: Achievement, Progress, 8 Climate, and (for high schools only) College & Career. This section provides a brief overview of each domain. Domain Weights This section explains how each domain is weighted. Because the 9 District is committed to ensuring that all students are learning, the Progress domain is weighted most heavily. Performance Tiers This section explains how a school's progress at the overall, 10 domain, and metric levels is categorized into four performance tiers: Intervene, Watch, Reinforce, and Model. Appendices Additional information on metric definitions; floors, targets, and 11 points possible; peer groups; and schools with consecutive years of overall score improvement. Page 1 2018-2019 School Progress Report User Guide SPR Components & Scoring Overview School Demographics & Performance Tiers Each School Progress Report begins with some basic information about the specific school being evalu- ated. It is formatted as in the sample below. School Name, Address, and The left side of the school demographics section provides all relevant contact Contact Information information for the school being evaluated, including address, phone and fax numbers, and the school's website. -
School District of Philadelphia Quarterly School Manager Report
School District of Philadelphia Quarterly School Manager Report FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2020 November 13, 2020 The School District of Philadelphia’s Quarterly School Manager Report for the period ended September 30, 2020 represents forward-looking statements and any such statements inherently are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those that have been projected. Such risks and uncertainties which could affect the revenues and obligations of the School District include, among others, reduced governmental allocations, changes in economic conditions, mandates from other governments, and various other events, conditions and circumstances, many of which are beyond the control of the School District. Such forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this presentation, November 13, 2020. The School District disclaims any obligation or undertaking to release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statement contained herein to reflect any changes in the School District’s expectations with regard thereto or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based. If you have a disability and the format of any material on our web pages interferes with your ability to access the information or you have a question regarding the School District’s website accessibility, please contact us via any of the following means for assistance: The School District of Philadelphia Office of Family and Community Engagement 440 N. Broad Street, Suite 114 Philadelphia, PA 19130-4015 Email: [email protected] Tel: (215) 400-4000 Fax: (215) 400-4181 To help us respond in a manner most helpful to you, please indicate the nature of the accessibility problem, the web address of the requested material, your preferred format in which you want to receive the material (electronic format (ASCII, etc.), standard print, large print, etc.), and your contact information (name, email, telephone, and physical mailing address). -
Mileage, Off-Campus Teaching Sites
Off Campus Teaching Sites MapQuest Driving Shortest Distance/Suggested Route Starting Point: 400 East 2nd Street Mileage (One Mileage (Round Active School District Address way) Trip) Allegheny Intermediate Unit #3 475 East Waterfront Drive, Homestead, PA 15120 222 445 Annville‐Cleona Area School District 520 S White Oak Street, Annville, PA 17003 69 137 Annville Elementary School 205 S. White Oak Street, Annville, PA 17003 68 136 Cleona Elementary School 50 E Walnut St, Cleona, PA 17042 66 132 Annville Cleona Junior/Senior High School 500 South White Oak Street, Annville, PA 17003 69 137 Appalachia IU 8 4500 6th Avenue, Altoona, PA 16602 132 264 Bellefonte Area School District 318 North Allegheny Street, Bellefonte, PA 16823 80 159 Bellefonte Area High School 830 E. Bishop Street, Bellefonte, PA 16823 79 158 Bellefonte Area Middle School 100 North School Street, Bellefonte, PA 16823‐2396 79 158 Bellefonte Elementary 100 West Linn Street, Bellefonte, PA 16823 80 159 Benner Elementary 490 Buffalo Run Road, Bellefonte, PA 16823‐9789 82 165 Marion Walker Elementary 100 School Drive, Bellefonte PA 16823‐9032 70 140 Pleasant Gap Elementary 230 South Main Street, Pleasant Gap PA 16823 83 165 Bensalem Township School District 3000 Donallen Drive, Bensalem, PA 19020 140 280 Belmont Hills Elementary School 5000 Neshaminy Boulevard, Bensalem, PA 19020 139 278 Cornwells Elementary School 2215 Hulmeville Road, Bensalem, PA 19020 141 282 Samuel K. Faust Elementary School 2901 Bellview Dr, Bensalem, PA 19020‐1311 138 276 Benjamin Rush Elementary School 3400 Hulmeville Road, Bensalem, PA 19020 141 281 Russell C. Struble Elementary School 4300 Bensalem Blvd, Bensalem, PA 19020 143 285 Valley Elementary School 3100 Donallen Dr, Bensalem, PA 19020‐1838 140 280 Robert K. -
No Choice John Barry School 30.73 19.79 49.48 William C
Column Averages → 31.65 22.02 46.33 School Name PreK-2 Hybrid Choice PreK-2 Digital Choice PreK-2 Digital - No Choice John Barry School 30.73 19.79 49.48 William C. Bryant School 12.50 7.35 80.15 Joseph W. Catharine School 18.50 7.50 74.00 Benjamin B. Comegys School 9.30 11.63 79.07 Sadie Alexander School 67.69 16.59 15.72 Andrew Hamilton School 17.35 25.51 57.14 Avery D. Harrington School 21.55 16.38 62.07 Henry C. Lea School 22.42 9.09 68.48 William C. Longstreth School 32.04 28.16 39.81 Morton McMichael School 48.05 18.18 33.77 S. Weir Mitchell School 45.65 28.99 25.36 Thomas G. Morton School 21.23 10.85 67.92 Samuel Powel School 0.72 0.00 99.28 John M. Patterson School 31.96 44.29 23.74 James Rhoads School 61.49 32.43 6.08 Martha Washington School 49.15 15.25 35.59 Penrose School 33.90 13.56 52.54 Add B. Anderson School 12.24 10.88 76.87 Alain Locke School 18.94 12.12 68.94 Rudolph Blankenburg School 32.65 38.78 28.57 D. Newlin Fell School 36.30 40.00 23.70 Bache-Martin School 72.16 19.89 7.95 F. Amedee Bregy School 33.80 9.86 56.34 George W. Childs School 33.33 40.31 26.36 Stephen Girard School 30.14 19.18 50.68 General George A. -
Elementary Schools- 81
2011 School District of Philadelphia Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Schools Elementary Schools - 81 ALEXANDER ADAIRE SCHOOL CHESTER A. ARTHUR SCHOOL BACHE-MARTIN SCHOOL BARTON SCHOOL JAMES G. BLAINE SCHOOL BRIDESBURG SCHOOL JOSEPH H. BROWN SCHOOL LEWIS C. CASSIDY SCHOOL J.W. CATHARINE SCHOOL CAYUGA SCHOOL GEORGE W. CHILDS SCHOOL WATSON COMLY SCHOOL COOK-WISSAHICKON SCHOOL KENNEDY C. CROSSAN SCHOOL ANNA B. DAY SCHOOL JULIA DE BURGOS BILINGUAL STEPHEN DECATUR SCHOOL WILLIAM DICK SCHOOL JAMES DOBSON SCHOOL PAUL L. DUNBAR SCHOOL FRANKLIN S. EDMONDS SCHOOL ELLWOOD SCHOOL ELEANOR C. EMLEN SCHOOL FELTONVILLE INTERMEDIATE FITLER ACADEMICS PLUS EDWIN FORREST SCHOOL FOX CHASE SCHOOL ANNE FRANK SCHOOL ROBERT FULTON SCHOOL EDWARD GIDEON SCHOOL SAMUEL GOMPERS SCHOOL JOSEPH GREENBERG SCHOOL HORATIO HACKETT B. SCHOOL ANDREW HAMILTON SCHOOL JOHN HANCOCK SCHOOL AVERY D. HARRINGTON SCHOOL CHARLES W. HENRY SCHOOL EDWARD HESTON SCHOOL HENRY E. HOUSTON SCHOOL JULIA WARD HOWE SCHOOL ANDREW JACKSON SCHOOL ABRAM JENKS SCHOOL 2011 School District of Philadelphia Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Schools JOHN S. JENKS SCHOOL JUNIATA PARK ACADEMY GENERAL PHILIP KEARNY SCHOOL JOHN B. KELLY SCHOOL FRANCIS SCOTT KEY SCHOOL ELIZA B. KIRKBRIDE SCHOOL ROBERT E. LAMBERTON SCHOOL WILLIAM LEVERING SCHOOL ANNA L. LINGELBACH SCHOOL ALAIN LOCKE SCHOOL WILLIAM H. LOESCHE SCHOOL JOHN MARSHALL SCHOOL GENERAL GEORGE A. MC CALL SCHOOL JOHN F. MC CLOSKEY SCHOOL WILLIAM M. MEREDITH SCHOOL S. WEIR MITCHELL SCHOOL JOHN MOFFET SCHOOL GEORGE W. NEBINGER SCHOOL OVERBROOK EDUCATIONAL CENTER OVERBROOK ELEMENTARY PENN ALEXANDER SAMUEL PENNYPACKER SCHOOL PENROSE SCHOOL ROBERT B. POLLOCK SCHOOL POTTER-THOMAS SCHOOL SAMUEL POWEL SCHOOL ANNA B. PRATT SCHOOL RHAWNHURST SCHOOL WILLIAM ROWEN SCHOOL SOLOMON SOLIS-COHEN SCHOOL SPRING GARDEN SCHOOL EDWIN M. -
The School District of Philadelphia
The School District of Philadelphia Potential Impact of $94.5M Revenue Reduction on School Budgets Methodology and Notes Key Green Text = Can Be Cut Red Text = Cannot Be Cut Notes: The “Enrollment Teachers” category includes Enrollment Driven Prep Teachers. 2011-12 budget data is post mid-year (December 2011) budget cuts. The Operating Budget Allotment in 2011-12 and 2012-13 is equivalent to the Per School and Per Student Allotments in 2010-11. Enrollment numbers are as projected in the spring preceding each budget year for the purpose of developing school budgets. All data is from the Staffing Management System (SMS). Data is as of 4/26/12. What can and can’t be cut? A decrease in operating revenues would have to be offset by cuts in the Operating Budget only, not in Grants. Grants budget information is shown for reference only. This analysis assumes the Enrollment Driven Teachers category is not cuttable because of maximum class sizes in the PFT collective bargaining agreement. This analysis assumes the following are not “cuttable” in FY13 because of state and federal service requirements; the extent of budget cuts that were already made in FY12; and the time that that would be required to reduce costs by changing the School District’s service model. o Gifted Support o Nursing Services o Special Education – High Incidence and Low Incidence o English as a Second Language (ESOL) o Bilingual Counselor Assistants Why are enrollments and poverty rates provided? Enrollment is important for context for Enrollment Driven Teachers (100% enrollment driven) and Operating Budget Allotment (partially enrollment driven). -
15 Years of Arts Education & Advocacy
15 YEARS OF ARTS EDUCATION & ADVOCACY PICASSO PROJECT: 15 YEARS OF ARTS EDUCATION & ADVOCACY At Picasso Project, we believe that all 15 YEARS OF IMPACT: students deserve access to the arts. This core belief sparked Picasso Project’s inception 15 years ago, when PCCY and a group of concerned citizens 40,750 177 joined together in response to lack of adequate funding students inspired school-based arts for public educaiton and the resultant near elimination of through the arts projects funded arts education from Philadelphia’s public schools. By providing grants to support innovative arts projects in Philadelphia public schools, and advocating for equitable access to arts education, Picasso Project has played a critical role in assuring that Philly’s kids have access to high quality arts education. It is with great pride that we celebrate 15 years of Picasso 813 256 Project and share our story here. As we look back at our teachers initiated arts & community roots, we simultaneously look ahead towards new and innovative arts projects organizations exciting directions for Picasso Project. partnered for projects Tim Gibbon Picasso Project Director Public Citizens for Children and Youth 1 2003 In 2003, the Picasso Project began with support and engagement from the community. Pennsylvania had just completed a “Give Back” initiative in which citizens were sent back “excess” funds collected by the State. At the same time, “Reminding the arts were disappearing from the Philadelphia’s public schools due to lack people of the of funding. A group of concerned individuals, including Vicki Ellis, Lucinda Post, Dennis Barnebey, and Germaine Ingram met with PCCY leadership and launched importance the Give Back the Give Back Campaign to urge citizens to help support the arts of the arts in in our public schools by sending in their ‘Give Back” funds. -
Philadelphia's Renaissance Schools Initiative
Philadelphia’s Renaissance Schools Initiative: 18 Month Interim Report February 2012 Prepared for the Accountability Review Council by Research for Action Authors Eva Gold, Ph.D. Michael H. Norton Deborah Good, M.S.W. Stephanie Levin, Ph.D. About Research for Action Research for Action (RFA) is a Philadelphia-based nonprofit organization. We seek to use research as the basis for the improvement of educational opportunities and outcomes for traditionally underserved students. Our work is designed to strengthen public schools and postsecondary institutions; provide research-based recommendations to policymakers, practitioners, and the public at the local, state, and national levels; and enrich the civic and community dialogue about public education. For more information, please visit our website at www.researchforaction.org. Acknowledgments This research was commissioned by the Accountability Review Council (ARC) for the School District of Philadelphia. We express our appreciation to Dr. Kenneth Wong, Executive Advisor to the ARC, and Dr. Tonya Wolford from the District, for their guidance of this project. We would also like to thank the District’s research staff, as well as ASPIRA, Mastery Charter Schools, Scholar Academies, and Universal Companies for providing data about the Renaissance Schools. In addition, a very special thanks goes to Central Office staff, the Philadelphia Federation of Teachers, and to the principals, assistant principals, teachers, and School Advisory Councils of the two Promise Academy case study schools for accommodating our requests for interviews and observations, and for graciously sharing their successes and challenges with us. This report was greatly enhanced by the contributions of many RFA staff and interns. -
05 Annual Rpt for Web.Indd
The Schuylkill Center for Environmental Education 2005 Annual Report Celebrating 40thOur OUR MISSION To promote, through environmental education, the preservation and improvement of our natural environment. We do this by: Fostering appreciation, understanding and responsible use of the ecosystem; Disseminating information on current environmental issues; Encouraging appropriate public response to environmental problems; Maintaining the facilities of the Center and conserving its land for the purpose of environmental education. 2 MESSAGE FROM THE BOARD CHAIR & EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR ur 40th anniversary year has been extraordinary! Celebrations throughout the year honored all those whose vision and hard work laid the foundation Ofor our current success. Sadly, we also paid our last respects to one of our founders, Henry H. H. Meigs, whose passing in February signified the end of an era. This milestone year has been marked by a renewed connection to our neighbors. A series of informal gatherings has strengthened relations, and the formation of the new Schuylkill Center Community Council has opened the door to ongoing dialogue about partnership efforts within the local community. Outside recognition from prominent local institutions brought validation for our efforts and commitment to environmental leadership. Our Education staff’s work with the Green Woods Charter School received commendation from the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, and our land restoration efforts garnered renewed funding from the Horace Acting Director, Dennis Burton (seated on left) and Goldsmith Foundation. We also received a substantial Board Chair, Harry Weiss (standing on right) with grant from the Pennsylvania Historical & Museum neighbors Mark Soffa, Brendan Binder and Ruth Ann Fitzpatrick celebrating the Center at a reception in the Commission.