DOCSLIB.ORG

No Choice John Barry School 30.73 19.79 49.48 William C

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
No Choice John Barry School 30.73 19.79 49.48 William C Column Averages → 31.65 22.02 46.33 School Name PreK-2 Hybrid Choice PreK-2 Digital Choice PreK-2 Digital - No Choice John Barry School 30.73 19.79 49.48 William C. Bryant School 12.50 7.35 80.15 Joseph W. Catharine School 18.50 7.50 74.00 Benjamin B. Comegys School 9.30 11.63 79.07 Sadie Alexander School 67.69 16.59 15.72 Andrew Hamilton School 17.35 25.51 57.14 Avery D. Harrington School 21.55 16.38 62.07 Henry C. Lea School 22.42 9.09 68.48 William C. Longstreth School 32.04 28.16 39.81 Morton McMichael School 48.05 18.18 33.77 S. Weir Mitchell School 45.65 28.99 25.36 Thomas G. Morton School 21.23 10.85 67.92 Samuel Powel School 0.72 0.00 99.28 John M. Patterson School 31.96 44.29 23.74 James Rhoads School 61.49 32.43 6.08 Martha Washington School 49.15 15.25 35.59 Penrose School 33.90 13.56 52.54 Add B. Anderson School 12.24 10.88 76.87 Alain Locke School 18.94 12.12 68.94 Rudolph Blankenburg School 32.65 38.78 28.57 D. Newlin Fell School 36.30 40.00 23.70 Bache-Martin School 72.16 19.89 7.95 F. Amedee Bregy School 33.80 9.86 56.34 George W. Childs School 33.33 40.31 26.36 Stephen Girard School 30.14 19.18 50.68 General George A. McCall School 30.17 32.33 37.50 Delaplaine McDaniel School 14.29 6.59 79.12 William M. Meredith School 58.29 22.11 19.60 Robert Morris School 9.68 11.29 79.03 Edwin M. Stanton School 42.02 33.61 24.37 Albert M. Greenfield School 29.71 41.00 29.29 Chester A. Arthur School 67.23 22.69 10.08 Laura W. Waring School 37.66 37.66 24.68 Andrew Jackson School 20.39 49.03 30.58 Abram S. Jenks School 35.00 54.29 10.71 Francis S. Key School 52.91 43.02 4.07 Eliza B. Kirkbride School 48.82 40.59 10.59 George W. Nebinger School 25.54 8.70 65.76 George W. Sharswood School 45.54 22.77 31.68 Southwark School 32.46 22.95 44.59 John H. Taggart School 37.11 17.61 45.28 Vare-Washington School 53.33 26.67 20.00 James G. Blaine School 15.32 13.51 71.17 Lewis C. Cassidy Academics Plus School 32.71 13.08 54.21 William Dick School 54.78 40.00 5.22 Samuel Gompers School 37.50 22.50 40.00 Edward Heston School 17.21 18.85 63.93 Robert E. Lamberton School 20.75 10.38 68.87 E. Washington Rhodes School 24.35 22.61 53.04 Kenderton Elementary School 32.03 21.88 46.09 Overbrook Elementary School 6.35 14.29 79.37 Thomas M. Peirce School 22.22 62.70 15.08 Dr. Ethel Allen School 16.67 12.32 71.01 Tanner G. Duckrey School 21.29 40.65 38.06 Richard R. Wright School 25.00 11.11 63.89 Overbrook Educational Center 60.47 9.30 30.23 Edward Gideon School 20.34 13.56 66.10 William D. Kelley School 12.00 4.00 84.00 General George G. Meade School 14.56 15.53 69.90 Julia de Burgos School 51.63 28.26 20.11 Alexander Adaire School 25.13 22.11 52.76 Henry A. Brown School 28.24 31.76 40.00 Paul L. Dunbar School 20.00 12.50 67.50 Lewis Elkin School 5.47 4.17 90.36 Horatio B. Hackett School 48.04 18.14 33.82 John F. Hartranft School 28.07 3.51 68.42 William H. Hunter School 33.33 31.62 35.04 James R. Ludlow School 50.85 15.25 33.90 William McKinley School 10.31 9.28 80.41 John Moffet School 39.71 11.76 48.53 Potter-Thomas School 25.90 15.83 58.27 Richmond School 44.50 29.84 25.65 Isaac A. Sheppard School 20.95 38.10 40.95 John Welsh School 34.74 18.95 46.32 Frances E. Willard School 27.75 30.64 41.62 William Cramp School 14.42 8.17 77.40 General Philip Kearny School 17.05 15.91 67.05 Cayuga School 34.50 15.79 49.71 Thurgood Marshall School 21.02 6.82 72.16 Philip H. Sheridan School 30.23 14.73 55.04 Spring Garden School 12.66 32.91 54.43 John H. Webster School 36.88 39.92 23.19 Honorable Luis Munoz-Marin School 40.53 41.05 18.42 Anna B. Day School 15.45 13.01 71.54 Franklin S. Edmonds School 13.29 15.19 71.52 Eleanor C. Emlen School 20.41 14.97 64.63 Fitler Academics Plus School 15.58 12.99 71.43 Charles W. Henry School 57.31 36.26 6.43 Henry H. Houston School 43.52 16.67 39.81 Jenks Academy for Arts and Sciences 35.37 34.69 29.93 James Logan School 8.77 6.14 85.09 John F. McCloskey School 15.38 8.97 75.64 Thomas Mifflin School 34.09 21.21 44.70 Joseph Pennell School 13.84 10.69 75.47 Samuel Pennypacker School 30.36 16.07 53.57 Theodore Roosevelt School 29.82 16.67 53.51 Shawmont School 59.87 17.11 23.03 Edward T. Steel School 30.00 35.00 35.00 Widener Memorial School 80.77 3.85 15.38 Cook-Wissahickon School 48.00 13.33 38.67 Anna L. Lingelbach School 16.82 18.69 64.49 James Dobson School 52.24 20.90 26.87 John B. Kelly School 17.33 8.42 74.26 Jay Cooke School 42.02 34.45 23.53 Juniata Park Academy 24.18 18.95 56.86 Clara Barton School 27.89 36.05 36.05 Laura H. Carnell School 15.85 13.54 70.61 Ellwood School 27.78 17.28 54.94 Thomas K. Finletter School 13.71 14.29 72.00 Benjamin Franklin School 24.75 11.88 63.37 Allen M. Stearne School 35.03 52.23 12.74 Francis Hopkinson School 20.64 13.30 66.06 Julia W. Howe School 34.75 14.41 50.85 Henry W. Lawton School 33.33 19.86 46.81 James R. Lowell School 27.55 21.49 50.96 John Marshall School 21.21 14.39 64.39 Alexander K. McClure School 23.66 25.95 50.38 Andrew J. Morrison School 51.50 40.00 8.50 Olney School 14.16 22.32 63.52 James J. Sullivan School 13.06 8.11 78.83 Bayard Taylor School 32.26 30.88 36.87 William H. Ziegler School 29.85 19.40 50.75 Bridesburg School 54.72 12.74 32.55 Prince Hall School 30.16 22.75 47.09 Mary M. Bethune School 32.56 18.02 49.42 William Rowen School 17.96 15.57 66.47 Ethan Allen School 12.89 11.72 75.39 Joseph H. Brown School 24.12 13.60 62.28 Kennedy C. Crossan School 46.10 35.71 18.18 Hamilton Disston School 29.28 10.36 60.36 Edwin Forrest School 31.19 24.34 44.47 Fox Chase School 53.88 20.69 25.43 Thomas Holme School 39.46 23.37 37.16 Mayfair School 26.71 61.00 12.29 J. Hampton Moore School 32.68 44.23 23.09 Solomon Solis-Cohen School 33.04 33.21 33.75 Gilbert Spruance School 17.22 12.78 70.00 Rhawnhurst School 25.71 24.64 49.64 Watson Comly School 60.93 38.14 0.93 Louis H. Farrell School 34.37 26.20 39.44 A.L. Fitzpatrick School 51.01 27.94 21.05 Anne Frank School 40.80 30.98 28.22 Robert B. Pollock School 26.32 9.72 63.97 Stephen Decatur School 60.34 24.75 14.92 Joseph Greenberg School 49.21 32.94 17.86 William H. Loesche School 42.70 31.91 25.39 John Hancock Demonstration School 58.64 26.82 14.55.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PCCY's Picasso Projects - 2003 Through 2015
    PCCY's Picasso Projects - 2003 through 2015 Partners (Individual Teaching Artists, Arts Grant Year School Project Title Organizations, and other Community Partners) Exploring Identity and Community through Fleisher Art Memorial- Chris Melohn, Elaine Erne// 2015 Chester Arthur Elementary Portrature, Print, and Bookmaking FoCA- Ivy Olesh Enchantment Theater- Jennifer Smith, Shannon 2015 F. Amedee Bregy Elementary The Story of Ferdinand Fitzsimmons, Jasmine Hammond, Carin Brastow Educational Ecosystems: Exposing Creative 2015 Stephen Girard Elementary All Heart Art Cart- Sarah Eskind & Jackie Quinn Learning William Cramp Elementary Moore College of Art and Design- David Moore, 2015 Film Crew @ Cramp Elementary School Young Audiences- Adam Nicolai Young Audiences- Adam Nicolai, Mark Wong, Steve 2015 Fitler Academic Plus Emerging Artists Youth Café Lunger, Alex Shaw, Jacon Winterstein 2015 Andrew Jackson School Pillars of Community CosaCosa- Kim Niemela Young Audiences- Adam Nicolai, Mark Elliot Best, 2015 Alain Locke Elementary Changing Life at Locke Through the Arts Alex Shaw, Joshua Robinson, Francois Zayas 2015 Alexander McClure Elementary Hope Reading Garden CosaCosa- Kim Niemela University City Arts League: Annette Monier, Dave 2015 Samuel Powel Elementary Greece: The Ancient and Modern Wonder Fowler, Sara Karlen PCCY's Picasso Projects - 2003 through 2015 Art Well: Cathy Cohen, Joe Brenman, Julia Terry, 2015 James Rhoads Elementary MasterPeace Scott Bickmore, Kara Rutledge Southwest Leadership Academy Breaking Injustice: Civil Rights
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond the Established Norms: a New Kind of Union Activism
    BEYOND THE ESTABLISHED NORMS: A NEW KIND OF UNION ACTIVISM LOCAL 3 • AFL-CIO Philadelphia Federation of Teachers Health & Welfare Fund’s Professional Development 1974-2014 PFT HEALTH & WELFARE FUND AND TEMPLE UNIVERSITY The PFT Health & Welfare Fund’s ER&D program and Temple Univer- sity worked together to provide PFT members with three graduate level courses to improve their effectiveness in the classroom. The courses offered were Beginning Reading Instruction, Foundations for Effective Teaching and Managing Student Behavior. The Fund acknowledges the following members of the Educational Issues PARTNERSHIP WITH CHEYNEY UNIVERSITY team for their role in the creation of Beyond the Established Norms: Camina Ceasar, Sandra Dunham, Marcia Hinton, Joyce Jones, Rosalind Jones Johnson, In 2008, the PFT Health & Welfare Fund and Cheyney University worked together to provide Philadel- phia teachers with high quality, peer-led professional development at Cheyney University’s urban cam- and Linda Whitaker. pus in Philadelphia. CHEYNEY UNIVERSITY PARTNERSHIP Rosalind Jones Johnson, keynote speaker for Cheyney University’s graduation hooding ceremony joins Dr. Michelle Vitale, President of Cheyney University and Dr. John Williams, Dean of Graduate Studies. Published January 2015 59 Table of Contents History Introduction . 4 Programs for Teaching Annual Conference . 6 QuEST Schools . 8 Philadelphia QuEST Professional Development . 12 Pennsylvania Department of Education Act 48 Provider . 13 Customized Professional Development . 13 On-Site School Support . 14 ER&D (Educational Research and Dissemination) . 16 New Unionism . 20 PFT Health & Welfare Fund and Cheyney University of Pennsylvania Collaborative . 20 PFT Health & Welfare Fund Did Not Get the Credit it Deserved . 23 Programs Philadelphia QuEST Reading Recovery .
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 ISP Conference Program Book (Click)
    2020 Pennsylvania Title I Improving Schools Performance Conference January 26-29, 2020 • Sheraton Station Square, Pittsburgh, PA Sponsored by: Pennsylvania Department of Education (PDE) and Pennsylvania Association of Federal Program Coordinators (PAFPC) also Step By Step Learning Major Sponsor & Exhibitors Major Sponsor Step By Step Learning Exhibitors 95 Percent Group, Inc. Benchmark Education Company Educational Technology Consultants, Inc. Heinemann Publishing Company Istation MIND Research Institute OSS/Kroy Product Center Renaissance Learning, Inc. Teacher Created Materials ThinkStretch Take a break and visit our vendors: Monday 10:45-11:15 and 3:30-4:00 Tuesday 9:30-10:00 and 2:30-3:00 ii Table of Contents Major Conference Sponsor & Exhibitors .............................................................................................................. ii 2019 Title I Distinguished Schools ............................................................................................................................iv Theme & Purpose ..........................................................................................................................................................1 About the Conference Agenda ..............................................................................................................................2 Selecting Sessions to Attend ................................................................................................................................... 2 Daily Planner ...................................................................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • School Cluster List
    APPENDIX G: SCHOOL CLUSTERS Providers may use the updated grid, along with public and charter school enrollment numbers and prior average utilization of behavioral health services, to estimate number and types of staff needed to adequately meet the needs of children in their clusters of interest. School enrollment information can be found at the School District of Philadelphia website here. Based on prior year utilization of behavioral health services, providers may calculate 2-7% of the total enrollment as an estimate of the number of children participating in behavioral health treatment. Providers may apply the 2% to “Model” schools, 4% to “Reinforce” schools, and 7% to “Watch” and “Intervene” schools. Please note that prior utilization is not a guarantee of future utilization. Charter schools are marked in red italics. Region 1 Cluster ZIP Code Level Grade Band Climate Score Elementary and Middle Schools Carnell, Laura H. 1 19111 Elem K to 5 Intervene Fox Chase 1 19111 Elem K to 5 Model Moore, J. Hampton School 1 19111 Elem K to 5 Model Crossan, Kennedy C. School 1 19111 Elem K to 5 Reinforce Wilson, Woodrow Middle School 1 19111 Middle 6 to 8 Reinforce Mathematics, Science & Technology II-MaST II Rising Sun 1 19111 Elem K to 4 Tacony Academy Charter School - Am. Paradigm 1 19111 Elem-Mid K to 8 Holme, Thomas School 2 19114 Elem K to 6 Reinforce Hancock, John Demonstration School 2 19114 Elem-Mid K to 8 Reinforce Comly, Watson School 2 19116 Elem K to 5 Model Loesche, William H. School 2 19116 Elem K to 5 Model Fitzpatrick, A.
    [Show full text]
  • Performance Audit ______
    PERFORMANCE AUDIT ____________ The School District of Philadelphia Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania ____________ May 2016 Dr. William R. Hite, Jr., Superintendent Ms. Marjorie G. Neff, SRC Chairperson School District of Philadelphia School District of Philadelphia 440 North Broad Street 440 North Broad Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19130 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19130 Dear Dr. Hite and Ms. Neff: Our performance audit of the School District of Philadelphia (District) evaluated the application of best practices in the areas of academics, governance, finance, data integrity, and textbook inventory. In addition, this audit determined the District’s compliance with certain relevant state laws, regulations, contracts, and administrative procedures (relevant requirements). This audit covered the period July 1, 2008 through June 30, 2014, except as otherwise stated and was conducted pursuant to Section 403 of The Fiscal Code, 72 P.S. § 403, and in accordance with the Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain sufficient, appropriate evidence to provide a reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based on our audit objectives. We believe that the evidence obtained provides a reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based on our audit objectives. During our audit, we found significant instances of failing to apply best practices and noncompliance with relevant requirements, as detailed in our six audit findings. A summary of the results is presented in the Executive Summary section of the audit report. Our audit findings and recommendations have been discussed with the District’s management, and their responses are included in the audit report.
    [Show full text]
  • Student Meal Sites Senior Meal Sites
    Find Free Food in City Council District 1 Councilmember Mark Squilla Food & Meal distribution made possible by: Philabundance, Philadelphia Corporation for the Aging, School District of Philadelphia, Share Food Program, Step Up To The Plate Campaign Student Meal Sites • All children and their caregivers are eligible. No ID is required. • Families can pick up one box per child with meals for the week. Site Name Address Days and Time Mon./Tues./Wed./Thurs./Fri. Mariana Bracetti Academy Charter School 1840 Torresdale Ave. 7 am – 1 pm Mastery Charter - Thomas Campus 927 Johnston St. Tues. & Fri. 12 pm – 2 pm Mastery Charter - Thomas Elementary 814 Bigler St. Tues. & Thurs. 1 pm – 4 pm D. Newlin Fell School 900 W Oregon Ave. Fri. 9 am – 2 pm Horace Furness High School 1900 S. 3rd St. Fri. 9 am – 2 pm Horatio B. Hackett School 2161 E. York St. Fri. 9 am – 2 pm John H. Webster School 3400 Frankford Ave. Fri. 9 am – 2 pm Jules E. Mastbaum High School 3116 Frankford Ave. Fri. 9 am – 2 pm 2051 E. Cumberland Fri. 9 am – 2 pm Kensington High School St. South Philadelphia High School 2101 S. Broad St. Fri. 9 am – 2 pm Senior Meal Sites • Residents age 60+ are eligible. No reservation needed. • Call senior center for meal schedule. Site Name Address Phone Number On Lok House Satellite 219 N. 10th St. 215-599-3016 Philadelphia Senior Center - Avenue of the Arts 509 S. Broad St. 215-546-5879 and Asia-Pacific Senior Resource Center South Philly Older Adult Center 1430 E.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolution Summary
    Final SCHOOL REFORM COMMISSION PUBLIC MEETING RESOLUTION SUMMARY JANUARY 19, 2017 I. SCHOOL REFORM COMMISSION SRC-1 (PRESENTED FOR REVIEW DECEMBER 15, 2016) Proposed Adoption of Policies #105.1 – Curriculum Review by Parents/Guardians and Students, #107 – Adoption of Planned Instruction, 113 – Special Education, #113.1 Discipline of Students with Disabilities, #113.2 – Behavior Support, #113.3 – Screening and Evaluations for Students with Disabilities, #113.4 – Confidentiality of Special Education Student Information, #122 – Extracurricular Activities, #123 – Interscholastic Athletics, #123.1 Concussion Management, #123.2 – Sudden Cardiac Arrest, #805.1 – Relations with Law Enforcement Agencies RESOLVED, that the School Reform Commission hereby adopts the following SRC Policies, in the forms attached, effective January 20, 2017: Policy 105.1 – Curriculum Review by Parents/Guardians and Students Policy 113.2 – Behavior Support Policy 113.4 – Confidentiality of Special Education Student Information Policy 123.1 – Concussion Management Policy 123.2 – Sudden Cardiac Arrest Policy 805.1 – Relations with Law Enforcement Agencies; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, that the School Reform Commission hereby adopts amendments to the following SRC Policies, in the forms attached, effective January 20, 2017: Policy 107 – Adoption of Planned Instruction Policy 113 – Special Education Policy 113.1 – Discipline of Students with Disabilities Policy 113.3 – Screening and Evaluations for Students with Disabilities Policy 122 – Extracurricular Activities Policy 123 – Interscholastic Athletics Description: The School Reform Commission establishes general parameters in which the daily operations of the School District are to be governed. As such, the policies (listed above and attached) have been revised and updated to align with current local, state and federal law.
    [Show full text]
  • User Guide 2018-2019 School Progress Report User Guide
    2018-2019 SCHOOL PROGRESS REPORT User Guide 2018-2019 School Progress Report User Guide Welcome This guide is intended to help you understand the various components that make up the SPR and will cover the following topics: Topic Content Page SPR Components This section provides an overview of the SPR layout and its main 3 & Scoring Overview components. It also provides details on how each metric and domain are scored. Report Types There are four SPR report types. This section explains how a 7 school's report type is determined. Domains The SPR is organized into four domains: Achievement, Progress, 8 Climate, and (for high schools only) College & Career. This section provides a brief overview of each domain. Domain Weights This section explains how each domain is weighted. Because the 9 District is committed to ensuring that all students are learning, the Progress domain is weighted most heavily. Performance Tiers This section explains how a school's progress at the overall, 10 domain, and metric levels is categorized into four performance tiers: Intervene, Watch, Reinforce, and Model. Appendices Additional information on metric definitions; floors, targets, and 11 points possible; peer groups; and schools with consecutive years of overall score improvement. Page 1 2018-2019 School Progress Report User Guide SPR Components & Scoring Overview School Demographics & Performance Tiers Each School Progress Report begins with some basic information about the specific school being evalu- ated. It is formatted as in the sample below. School Name, Address, and The left side of the school demographics section provides all relevant contact Contact Information information for the school being evaluated, including address, phone and fax numbers, and the school's website.
    [Show full text]
  • School State 11TH STREET ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL KY 12TH
    School State 11TH STREET ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL KY 12TH STREET ACADEMY NC 21ST CENTURY ALTERNATIVE MO 21ST CENTURY COMMUNITY SCHOOLHOUSE OR 21ST CENTURY CYBER CS PA 270 HOPKINS ALC MN 270 HOPKINS ALT. PRG - OFF CAMPUS MN 270 HOPKINS HS ALC MN 271 KENNEDY ALC MN 271 MINDQUEST OLL MN 271 SHAPE ALC MN 276 MINNETONKA HS ALC MN 276 MINNETONKA SR. ALC MN 276-MINNETONKA RSR-ALC MN 279 IS ALC MN 279 SR HI ALC MN 281 HIGHVIEW ALC MN 281 ROBBINSDALE TASC ALC MN 281 WINNETKA LEARNING CTR. ALC MN 3-6 PROG (BNTFL HIGH) UT 3-6 PROG (CLRFLD HIGH) UT 3-B DENTENTION CENTER ID 622 ALT MID./HIGH SCHOOL MN 917 FARMINGTON HS. MN 917 HASTINGS HIGH SCHOOL MN 917 LAKEVILLE SR. HIGH MN 917 SIBLEY HIGH SCHOOL MN 917 SIMLEY HIGH SCHOOL SP. ED. MN A & M CONS H S TX A B SHEPARD HIGH SCH (CAMPUS) IL A C E ALTER TX A C FLORA HIGH SC A C JONES HIGH SCHOOL TX A C REYNOLDS HIGH NC A CROSBY KENNETT SR HIGH NH A E P TX A G WEST BLACK HILLS HIGH SCHOOL WA A I M TX A I M S CTR H S TX A J MOORE ACAD TX A L BROWN HIGH NC A L P H A CAMPUS TX A L P H A CAMPUS TX A MACEO SMITH H S TX A P FATHEREE VOC TECH SCHOOL MS A. C. E. AZ A. C. E. S. CT A. CRAWFORD MOSLEY HIGH SCHOOL FL A. D. HARRIS HIGH SCHOOL FL A.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Sexual Abuse Claims in Chapter 11 Cases of Boy Scouts of America
    Summary of Sexual Abuse Claims in Chapter 11 Cases of Boy Scouts of America There are approximately 101,135sexual abuse claims filed. Of those claims, the Tort Claimants’ Committee estimates that there are approximately 83,807 unique claims if the amended and superseded and multiple claims filed on account of the same survivor are removed. The summary of sexual abuse claims below uses the set of 83,807 of claim for purposes of claims summary below.1 The Tort Claimants’ Committee has broken down the sexual abuse claims in various categories for the purpose of disclosing where and when the sexual abuse claims arose and the identity of certain of the parties that are implicated in the alleged sexual abuse. Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a chart that shows the sexual abuse claims broken down by the year in which they first arose. Please note that there approximately 10,500 claims did not provide a date for when the sexual abuse occurred. As a result, those claims have not been assigned a year in which the abuse first arose. Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a chart that shows the claims broken down by the state or jurisdiction in which they arose. Please note there are approximately 7,186 claims that did not provide a location of abuse. Those claims are reflected by YY or ZZ in the codes used to identify the applicable state or jurisdiction. Those claims have not been assigned a state or other jurisdiction. Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 is a chart that shows the claims broken down by the Local Council implicated in the sexual abuse.
    [Show full text]
  • School District of Philadelphia Quarterly School Manager Report
    School District of Philadelphia Quarterly School Manager Report FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2020 November 13, 2020 The School District of Philadelphia’s Quarterly School Manager Report for the period ended September 30, 2020 represents forward-looking statements and any such statements inherently are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those that have been projected. Such risks and uncertainties which could affect the revenues and obligations of the School District include, among others, reduced governmental allocations, changes in economic conditions, mandates from other governments, and various other events, conditions and circumstances, many of which are beyond the control of the School District. Such forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this presentation, November 13, 2020. The School District disclaims any obligation or undertaking to release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statement contained herein to reflect any changes in the School District’s expectations with regard thereto or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based. If you have a disability and the format of any material on our web pages interferes with your ability to access the information or you have a question regarding the School District’s website accessibility, please contact us via any of the following means for assistance: The School District of Philadelphia Office of Family and Community Engagement 440 N. Broad Street, Suite 114 Philadelphia, PA 19130-4015 Email: [email protected] Tel: (215) 400-4000 Fax: (215) 400-4181 To help us respond in a manner most helpful to you, please indicate the nature of the accessibility problem, the web address of the requested material, your preferred format in which you want to receive the material (electronic format (ASCII, etc.), standard print, large print, etc.), and your contact information (name, email, telephone, and physical mailing address).
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvania's Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports System
    Positive ennsylvania P Behavior Support Pennsylvania’s Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports System: Recognition 2018-2019 School Year PaPBS Network ol B o ase ch d S Pennsylvania Community B of Practice h e t h l a av e ioral H Positive ennsylvania P Behavior Support Recognition of Program Wide and School Wide Sites • Universal (Tier 1) Initial Implementation With Fidelity • Universal (Tier 1) Sustained Implementation With Fidelity • Universal (Tier 1) and Targeted (Tier 2) Implementation With Fidelity • Universal (Tier 1), Targeted (Tier 2), and Intensive (Tier 3) Implementation With Fidelity 3 The Pennsylvania Positive Behavior Support Network (PaPBS) is pleased to announce the 2019 recipients of recognition for high fidelity implementation of Positive Behavior Interventions and Support (PBIS). The PaPBS Network recognition system annually identifies and publicly distinguishes Pennsylvania’s Program Wide (PW) and School Wide (SW) sites for successful implementation of PBIS. Each fall, PBIS sites across the commonwealth submit an application in order to be considered for recognition, based on the following criteria: • In good standing of the PaPBS Network, • Supported by a PaPBS Network Facilitator, and • Submitted 2017-2018 annual data as required by the PaPBS Network program evaluator. There are four categories of recognition for which schools and programs can apply. The following requirements are based on the type of recognition sought by the applicant: Universal (Tier 1) Initial Implementation With Fidelity Fidelity of implementation
    [Show full text]