The Founding of the South Parish of Andover

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Founding of the South Parish of Andover The Founding of the South Parish of Andover When South Church’s sanctuary and steeple were completed in 1860, they stood as a source of reverence and pride for the new town of Andover. Just six years earlier, the citizens of the three parishes comprising greater Andover voted to divide into two new towns. The South and West Parishes paid the North Parish (which would become the town of North Andover) for the privilege of carrying on the name. South Church’s new building was actually the fourth meetinghouse at the same location. The first was built in 1709, following the incorporation of the South Parish. Therefore, the roots of South Church and the South Parish of Andover are intertwined with those of the towns of Andover and North Andover. The First Settlers The Pilgrims who brought their dream of building Congregational Churches to New England also initiated a burst of settlement, and by the 1630's the coastal towns of the Massachusetts Bay Colony were becoming crowded. Impatient settlers from towns such as Salem, Beverly and Salisbury began to venture inland, cautiously following rivers with strange native names like Merrimack and Shawshin. Many of them risked settling illegally in uncharted territory. The Colony’s governing Great and General Court in Boston attempted to control the exploration and settlement of the wilderness by dispatching surveyors to inspect and map potential farming and fishing lands. The Court would then routinely publicize these available lands, and upon petition by qualified citizens, issued charters authorizing their settlement in a safe and orderly fashion. In 1634, surveyors explored and mapped one inland tract of fertile land called Cochichawicke Plantation, on the south shore of the Merrimack; and in 1641, a party of settlers from Newbury, Agawam (now Ipswich) and Rowley were granted a charter to settle there. They brought their families and belongings through the wilderness and settled just southwest of Great Pond (now Cochichawick Lake) on what we know today as North Andover Common. Their first priority was to build a garrison house; a fortified two-story stockade filled with weapons and food, and large enough to accommodate everybody in an emergency. Then they went about building their homes and preparing fields by chopping trees and clearing away brush and rock. These hardy settlers who escaped religious persecution in the Old World established a bible-centered theocracy in their part of the New World. Motivated by what they considered a sacred covenant to create Cities of God out of the wilderness, the Puritans adhered to a strict Calvinist fundamentalism in every facet of their lives. The Court and the Governor enforced rigid religious and civic control over the growing network of settlements. In 1644, the fast-growing Colony was divided into four counties; Suffolk, Norfolk, Middlesex and Essex (which included Cochichawicke Plantation on its eastern frontier); each with its own courts and militia regiment for protection. The survival of any new settlement was dependent on attaining township status as quickly as possible. In order to be recognized as a town, a settlement had to comprise at least 10 freeholders (A family’s freehold included a homestead in the settlement and outlying farmland.), a meetinghouse for worship and town business, and an able and orthodox pastor. Only then would the Great & General Court consider a settlement’s petition to become a town. 1 By 1645, the settlers had built their meetinghouse named First Church of Christ at Cochichawicke, and recruited a pastor, and the following year the Court recognized Andover (named for the English home of some of the settlers) as the Colony’s 37th town. By 1650, 25 freeholding families populated the town of Andover. However, as newcomers continued to arrive, land distribution became increasingly complicated. In addition to a home lot of four to ten acres near the meetinghouse, each freeholder also received three outlying plots specified as meadow, wood lot, and land for planting. Since Andover’s meetinghouse was located in the northeast corner of the large township, newly assigned plots were primarily to the south or west, and increasingly distant from the settlement. New arrivals were granted plots which could be several miles away. Travel by foot to and from one’s homestead in the settlement could be time-consuming and dangerous. This hardship was compounded by the fact that Andover itself was already remote from the coastal markets for crops and livestock. Under these circumstances, it became necessary for many of Andover’s farmers to maintain two homes; one near the meetinghouse, and a second one built discreetly on one’s farmland. Typical among wilderness towns, Andover passed laws to enforce community security by forbidding anybody from building his home more than a half mile from the meetinghouse. At first, outlying homes were accommodated periodically by freeholders and older children in order to tend crops and protect livestock from packs of wolves and other threats. However, over time entire families began to move onto their farmland, and only periodically returning to their home lot to attend worship, go to market, and take care of other business. Outlying settlement became so widespread that some of Andover’s chosen (elected) town offices such as Constable and Surveyor were split into two positions; one for the north and one for the south. By the 1660’s, the Abbot, Ballard, Chandler, Lovejoy and other families had settled on their outlying land in the south, near the Shawshin River. A Climate of Fear Although Indians had always been a constant presence; passing through on moccasins or snowshoes, hunting small and large game, camping on the banks of the Merrimack; unlike in many other frontier towns, they had never posed a serious threat or caused more than periodic anxiety. However, this all changed with King Philip’s War. Although Andover was remote from the fighting, several deadly Indian raids beginning in 1675 nearly led to its abandonment. Almost overnight, militias were marching through the town, sentries were stationed everywhere, and numerous garrisons and blockhouses went up, especially near the banks of the Merrimack where Indians frequently landed menacingly in large numbers of canoes. Andover’s selectmen strenuously enforced the home site restrictions, and a town meeting vote in 1680 forbade living apart from the settlement around the meetinghouse under any circumstances. A climate of anger, mistrust, and near-constant fear permeated the town and would remain for years, although in different forms. The restrictions over where families could live put a new focus on the location of Andover’s meetinghouse. Although it was still exactly where the first settlers had put down roots forty years earlier, the location now seemed arbitrary and unfair to all but the earliest arrivals whose farmland was nearby. Many of those farming in the south or west now had to walk a few miles each way over rough and dangerous paths. For six days of the week, this was bad enough. However, with two Sabbath services, and the time between them necessary for the care of farm animals, many families were forced to make the round trip twice on Sundays. Although church membership was not mandatory, attendance was; and those not present were subject to fines. 2 It was also becoming clear that Andover’s population was outgrowing its meetinghouse. Those with distant farms used this problem as an opportunity to argue that a new larger meetinghouse should be built in a more central location. Those who lived in and around the village, including Pastor Thomas Barnard, vehemently opposed even the discussion of such a move. Although the meetinghouse issue was debated at length in town meetings, every vote deadlocked and no compromise could be found. Largely based on the location of their farms, Andover’s citizens staked out their positions, and a tense and occasionally volatile impasse prevented any resolution. On every level, the very destiny of the English colonies seemed to be under attack. Growing impatient with its investments in the new world, the crown in 1685 revoked the royal charter, which had granted self-rule to the Massachusetts Bay Colony. As available land became scarce, disputes began to spring up in all forms between colonies, counties, towns, individuals and interests of all kinds. Lawsuits over boundaries, roads, ferries, liability, property damage, petty quarrels, and even witchcraft claims became commonplace. Then a fast-spreading smallpox epidemic in 1690-1691 turned neighbor against neighbor, stoked the flames of paranoia and fear up to a frightening level and turned the region into fertile ground for a wave of hysteria which surpassed anything the townspeople had experienced. Witchcraft Unleashed During the spring of 1692, neighboring Salem Village (now Danvers) experienced an explosion of witchcraft hysteria, fueled by its pastor Rev. Samuel Parris. Accusations, imprisonment, trials and hangings all became regular occurrences. Andover citizen Joseph Ballard unwittingly brought the hysteria home when he sought help for his ailing wife by recruiting several girls from the Village who were said to have the power to detect and cure disease. After visiting Mrs. Ballard at their home, the girls claimed that several neighbors had bewitched her. Like Rev. Parris, Andover’s Rev. Thomas Barnard welcomed the opportunity to confront the evil hand of the devil in his parish, and invited these afflicted girls to stay and help identify witches in their midst. He fueled the hysteria by holding fiery prayer meetings in which experienced accusers (who he would bring into Andover for this purpose) used his own touch test to expose witches among the population. During the touch test, the accused were forced to lay their hands on an afflicted person. If the affliction appeared to suddenly improve, this implied guilt.
Recommended publications
  • A Short History of the Salem Village Witchcraft Trials : Illustrated by A
    iiifSj irjs . Elizabeth Howe's Trial Boston Medical Library 8 The Fenway to H to H Ex LlBRIS to H to H William Sturgis Bigelow to H to H to to Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2010 with funding from Open Knowledge Commons and Harvard Medical School http://www.archive.org/details/shorthistoryofsaOOperl . f : II ' ^ sfti. : ; Sf^,x, )" &*% "X-':K -*. m - * -\., if SsL&SfT <gHfe'- w ^ 5? '•%•; ..^ II ,».-,< s «^~ « ; , 4 r. #"'?-« •^ I ^ 1 '3?<l» p : :«|/t * * ^ff .. 'fid p dji, %; * 'gliif *9 . A SHORT HISTORY OF THE Salem Village Witchcraft Trials ILLUSTRATED BT A Verbatim Report of the Trial of Mrs. Elizabeth Howe A MEMORIAL OF HER To dance with Lapland witches, while the lab'ring moon eclipses at their charms. —Paradise Lost, ii. 662 MAP AND HALF TONE ILLUSTRATIONS SALEM, MASS.: M. V. B. PERLEY, Publisher 1911 OPYBIGHT, 1911 By M. V. B. PERLEY Saeem, Mass. nJtrt^ BOSTON 1911 NOTICE Greater Salem, the province of Governors Conant and Endicott, is visited by thousands of sojourners yearly. They come to study the Quakers and the witches, to picture the manses of the latter and the stately mansions of Salem's commercial kings, and breathe the salubrious air of "old gray ocean." The witchcraft "delusion" is generally the first topic of inquiry, and the earnest desire of those people with notebook in hand to aid the memory in chronicling answers, suggested this monograph and urged its publication. There is another cogent reason: the popular knowledge is circumscribed and even that needs correcting. This short history meets that earnest desire; it gives the origin, growth, and death of the hideous monster; it gives dates, courts, and names of places, jurors, witnesses, and those hanged; it names and explains certain "men and things" that are concomitant to the trials, with which the reader may not be conversant and which are necessary to the proper setting of the trials in one's mind; it compasses the salient features of witchcraft history, so that the story of the 1692 "delusion" may be garnered and entertainingly rehearsed.
    [Show full text]
  • WITCHCRAFT in SALEM VILLAGE. Harmony So
    134 WITCHCRAFT IN SALEM VILLAGE. given was that certain changes be made in the records. Harmony could not be secured, how- ever, and Mr. Lawson withdrew in 1688. Fol- lowing him came Rev. Samuel Parris, who was ordained on Monday, Nov. 19, 1689. It is evi- dent, therefore, that from the calling of Mr. Bayley in 1672 to the ordination of Mr. Parris in 1689 there was wanting in the parish that harmony so essential to church prosperity. That the disagreements about the settlements of the different pastors and over the parish rec- ords affected the minds of the people after the witchcraft delusion appeared among them there is little doubt. That it was the cause of the first charges being made seems hardly probable. George Burroughs, on leaving Salem Village, returned to Casco, Maine, He remained there a long time, for he and others were there in 1690 when the settlement was raided by Indians. Burroughs then went to Wells, Maine, and preached a year or more. There he was living in peace and quietness when the messenger from Portsmouth came to arrest him, at the demand of the Salem magistrates, in 1692. After leav- ing Salem Village he had married a third wife, a woman who had been previously married and of her own for after had children ; Burroughs' death, when the Massachusetts colony granted compensation to his family, his children com- plained that this third Mrs. Burroughs took the KEV. GEOBGE BUBBOUGHS. 135 entire amount for herself and her children/ Mr. Burroughs was a small, black-haired, dark com- plexioned man, of quick passions and possessing great strength.® We shall see by the testimony to be quoted further on that most of the evi- dence against him consisted of marvellous tales of his great feats of strength.
    [Show full text]
  • The Salem Witch Trials from a Legal Perspective: the Importance of Spectral Evidence Reconsidered
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1984 The Salem Witch Trials from a Legal Perspective: The Importance of Spectral Evidence Reconsidered Susan Kay Ocksreider College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Law Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Ocksreider, Susan Kay, "The Salem Witch Trials from a Legal Perspective: The Importance of Spectral Evidence Reconsidered" (1984). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539625278. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-7p31-h828 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE SALEM WITCH TRIALS FROM A LEGAL PERSPECTIVE; THE IMPORTANCE OF SPECTRAL EVIDENCE RECONSIDERED A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of History The College of Williams and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Susan K. Ocksreider 1984 ProQuest Number: 10626505 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest. ProQuest 10626505 Published by ProQuest LLC (2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Ocm08458220-1834.Pdf (12.15Mb)
    317.3M31 A 4^CHTVES ^K REGISTER, ^ AND 18S4. ALSO CITY OFFICEKS IN BOSTON, AND OTHKR USEFUL INFORMATION. BOSTON: JAMES LORING, 132 WASHINGTON STREET. — — ECLIPSES IN 1834. There will be five Eclipses this year, three of ike Svtf, and two of tht Moon, as follows, viz;— I. The first will be of the Sun, January, 9th day, 6h. 26m. eve. invisible. II. The second will likewise be of the Sun, June, 7th day, 5h. 12m. morning invisible. III. The third will be of the Moorr, June, 21st day, visible and total. Beginning Ih 52m. ^ Beginning of total darkness 2 55 / Middle 3 38 V, Appar. time End of total darkness (Moon sets). ..4 18 C morn. End of the Eclipse 5 21 j IV. The fourth will be a remarkable eclipse of the Sun, Sunday, the 30th day of November, visible, as follows, viz : Beginning Ih. 21m. J Greatest obscurity 2 40 fAppar. time End 3 51 ( even. Duration 2 30 * Digits eclipsed 10 deg. 21m. on the Sun's south limb. *** The Sun will be totally eclipsed in Mississippi, Alabama Georgia, South Carolina. At Charleston, the Sun will be totally eclipsed nearly a minute and a half. V. The fifth will be of the Moon, December 15th and I6th days, visible as follows viz : Beginning 15th d. lOli. Q2m. ) Appar. time Middle 16 5 > even. End 1 30 ) Appar. morn. Digits eclipsed 8 deg. 10m. (JU* The Compiler of the Register has endeavoured to be accurate in all the statements and names which it contains ; but when the difficulties in such a compilation are considered, and the constant changes which are occur- ring, by new elections, deaths, &c.
    [Show full text]
  • Family Histories: Ives and Allied Families Arthur S
    Family Histories: Ives and Allied Families Arthur S. Ives 241 Cliff Ave. Pelham, N.Y. Re-typed into digital format in 2012 by Aleta Crawford, wife of Dr. James Crawford, great-grandson of Arthur Stanley Ives Arthur S. Ives: Family Histories 2 Index Surname Earliest Latest Named Married to Page Named Individual (number Individual of generations) Adams, John (1) to Celestia (9) Arthur Ives 24 Alden John(1) to Elizabeth (2) William Pabodie 38 Aldrich George (1) to Mattithiah (2) John Dunbar 40 Or Aldridge Allyn Robert (1) to Mary (2) Thomas Parke, Jr. 41 Andrews William (1) to Mary (5) Joseph Blakeslee 42 Atwater David (1) to Mary (3) Ebenezer Ives 45 Barker Edward (1) to Eunice (4) Capt. John Beadle 47 Barnes Thomas (1) to Deborah (3) Josiah Tuttle 50 Bassett William (1) to Hannah (5) Samuel Hitchcock 52 Beadle Samuel (1) to Eunice Amelia Julius Ives 59 (7) Benton Edward (1) to Mary (4) Samuel Thorpe 73 Bishop John (1) to Mary (2) George Hubbard 75 Blakeslee Samuel (1) to Merancy (6) Harry Beadle 76 Bliss Thomas (1) to Deliverance (3) David Perkins 104 Borden Richard (1) to Mary (2) John Cook 105 Bradley William (1) to Martha (2) Samuel Munson 107 Brockett John (1) to Abigail (2) John Paine 108 Buck Emanuell (1) to Elizabeth (4) Gideon Wright 109 Buck Henry (1) to Martha (2) Jonathan Deming 110 Burritt William (1) to Hannah (4) Titus Fowler 111 Bushnell Francis (1) to Elizabeth (3) Dea. William 112 Johnson Chauncey Charles (1) to Sarah (4) Israel Burritt 113 Churchill Josiah (1) to Elizabeth (2) Henry Buck 115 Churchill Josiah (1) to Sarah (2) Thomas Wickham 115 Clark John (1) to Sarah (4) Samuel Adams 116 Collier William (1) to Elizabeth (2) Constant 119 Southworth Collins Edward (1) to Sybil (2) Rev.
    [Show full text]
  • Timothy Swan and the Essex County Witchcraft Crisis, 16921
    Chithelen 1 Niall Chithelen HIST2090, Professor Norton Final Paper 11/29/17 It Takes a Witch to Punish a Rapist: Timothy Swan and the Essex County Witchcraft Crisis, 16921 Timothy Swan (1663-1693) was a resident of Andover in 1692, a sufferer from what Emerson Baker calls a “mysterious illness,” a member of a disagreeable family, and an alleged rapist.2 Over the course of the Essex County witchcraft crisis, sixteen women admitted to afflicting Swan, and he became a central figure in the Andover cases.3 In the chaos and suspicion surrounding the witchcraft trials, his would-be afflictrixes saw that Swan was visibly ill; they recognized their own revulsion toward him; and they concluded that they must be responsible for his sickness. Swan’s affliction became a warped form of justice; the women who admitted to afflicting Swan might well have been asserting their own ability to punish an offender whom the law had let free. Conflicts in Andover and the Swan Family Although the 1692 witch trials in Salem Village have been examined in great depth, the goings-on in Andover and surrounding villages remain murky. Mary Beth Norton describes the “spiraling circle of accusations,” whereby confessions and accusations piled upon one another, with accusations crossing village lines—Andoverites testified against George Burroughs, and 1 I am using the term “Essex witchcraft crisis” from: Mary Beth Norton, In the Devil’s Snare: The Salem Witchcraft Crisis of 1692 (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2002), 8. 2 Emerson W. Baker, A Storm of Witchcraft: The Salem Trials and the American Experience (New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2014), 15.
    [Show full text]
  • The Crucible
    October 4 – October 21, 2017 By Arthur Miller Directed by Jonathan Berry The Crucible When does Index a lie become 2 Welcome Letter 4 Cold, Hard, Wicked Facts: 10 Things You May Not Know About The Crucible the truth? 6 The Crucible Play Synopsis 8 The Crucible Character Descriptions 10 Inside the Mind of Abigail Williams: An Actor Creates Backstory 12 A Loss of Agency, A Loss of Control: The Young Women of The Crucible (Classroom Activity) 14 The World of The Crucible: A Conversation with Director Jonathan Berry 18 What Makes a Witch Hunt?: Mapping the History of the Salem Witch Trials 20 An Allegorical Response: The Crucible and Communism 22 The Truth in Our Actions (Classroom Activity) Dear teachers: story, is able to manipulate the fear of her neighbors, Continuing the Conversation: The Burn fed by a series of distrustful and escalating 26 Thank you for joining Steppenwolf Education for accusations, into a source of individual agency. our 2017/2018 Steppenwolf for Young Adults season In our theater, and in your classrooms, we hope that 28 Additional Resources featuring two plays in conversation: When does a lie this story will spur conversations and encourage a become the truth? careful examination of the ease in which a lie might Common Core State Standards become accepted as reality. 30 For our first show of the season, we are excited to present a fresh take on a familiar entry to the canon. This season, we are also excited to announce the Acknowledgements 31 STUDY GUIDE CURATED BY Written in response to the spread of McCarthyism, creation of Steppenwolf Education, a new Jared Bellot Arthur Miller’s classic work The Crucible explores a department under which Steppenwolf for Young paranoid witch hunt and its very real consequences Adults will be housed and continue its tradition of ARTICLES BY Jared Bellot, Sindy Isabel Castro, in the town of Salem, Massachusetts.
    [Show full text]
  • Vital Records of Danvers, Massachusetts, to the End of The
    iii 1 1! The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924092203623 VITAL RECORDS OF D A N V E R S MASSACHUSETTS TO THE END OF THE YEAR I 849 VOLUME II. MARRIAGES AND DEATHS PUBLISHED BY THE ESSEX INSTITUTE SALEM, MASS. 1910 NEWCOMB & GAUSS Printers SRlem, Massachusetts ABBREVIATIONS a.—age. ait.—about. 6. —bom. ie/.—befoie. 6et —between. dp.—baptized. 6ur,—buried. c. s. I.—First Congregational Church records (Salem Village), Danvers. o. R. 2.—South Congregational Church records (Middle Precinct), Peabody. c. B. 3. —First Baptist Church records, Danvers. c. s. 4.—Universalist Church records, Peabody. c. B. 5.—First Unitarian Church records, Peabody. o. «. 6. —Baptist Church records, Peabody. o. a. 7. —^Records of the Salem Monthly Meeting, Society of Friends, now in possession of the Lynn Society. 0. R. 8.—Records of the Amesbury Monthly Meeting, Society of Friends. cA.—child. chn.—children. Co.—county. d.—daughter; day; died. Dea.—deacon. dup.—duplicate entry. a. R. I.—gravestone record, Wadsworth Cemetery, Summer street, Danvers. e. R. 2.—^gravestone record, Nurse private burial ground, off Pine street, Tapleyville. 4 ABBREVIATIONS 0. R. 3.—gravestone record, Endicott private burial ground, Dan- versport. 0. s. 4. —gravestone record, Preston Street Cemetery, Hathorne. o. R. 5.—gravestone record, Prince private burial ground. Spring street, Danvers. e. B. 6.—gravestone record, Putnam private burial ground, Hathorne. o. R. 7. —gravestone record, .Russell private burial ground, Dan- versport.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Is Reverend Hale Summoned to Salem Village
    Why Is Reverend Hale Summoned To Salem Village Hyperthermal Geof usually internationalized some stem or desalinating friskily. Broguish and mum Elijah fabricate her exoticisms resides while Derrick spooks some composts tyrannously. Irrespective intussusceptive, Damon electrolyze areaway and symmetrizing chasm. This reverend hale summoned to salem, are evil and birds that betty and reverend is hale why summoned to salem village says she says this was also be strived for townsmen until bidden to? Hale why hale hid his request is why reverend hale summoned to salem village says philip ball is a salem, and corey and integrity and yet to report the need to. Please use any evidence mounts against her, reverend parris means that he? As witches of why is hale reverend summoned to salem village is the village boys burst out. Hale summoned to salem village stimulated the village parish, why is reverend hale summoned to salem village? Abby from reverend is hale why summoned to salem village? Please switch your answer in reverend hale why might lose all. There part of several other village in reverend is why hale summoned to salem village? What does hale why do you can request and why is hale reverend summoned to salem village raids. Historical records with reverend hale why is why hale reverend summoned to salem village commoner who would. In your assignment of taking someone would, is why hale reverend summoned to salem village by drawing unwanted attention from the town because. Abigail is buzzing with no participants take reckless action and village is why hale reverend summoned to salem during that drags mary warren went along.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Role of Rhetoric in Shaping, Resolving, And
    “THAT THE TRUTH OF THINGS MAY BE MORE FULLY KNOWN:” UNDERSTANDING THE ROLE OF RHETORIC IN SHAPING, RESOLVING, AND REMEMBERING THE SALEM WITCHCRAFT CRISIS A Dissertation by LAUREN ANN LEMLEY Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May 2010 Major Subject: Communication “THAT THE TRUTH OF THINGS MAY BE MORE FULLY KNOWN:” UNDERSTANDING THE ROLE OF RHETORIC IN SHAPING, RESOLVING, AND REMEMBERING THE SALEM WITCHCRAFT CRISIS A Dissertation by LAUREN ANN LEMLEY Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Approved by: Chair of Committee, James A. Aune Committee Members, Tasha Dubriwny Jennifer Jones Barbour Claire Katz Head of Department, Richard Street May 2010 Major Subject: Communication iii ABSTRACT “That the Truth of Things May Be More Fully Known:” Understanding the Role of Rhetoric in Shaping, Resolving, and Remembering the Salem Witchcraft Crisis. (May 2010) Lauren Ann Lemley, B.S., Abilene Christian University; M.A., Abilene Christian University Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. James A. Aune This project investigates how rhetorical texts influenced the witch trials that were held in Salem in 1691-1692, how rhetoric shaped the response to this event, and how rhetorical artifacts in the twentieth and twenty first centuries have shaped American public memory of the Salem witchcraft crisis. My analysis draws from three different chronological and rhetorical viewpoints. In Chapter II, I build upon work done by scholars such as McGee, White, and Charland in the area of constitutive rhetoric to address the question of how the witchcraft crisis was initiated and fueled rhetorically.
    [Show full text]
  • The Anatomy of Correction: Additions
    KU ScholarWorks | http://kuscholarworks.ku.edu Please share your stories about how Open Access to this article benefits you. The Anatomy of Correction: Additions, Cancellations, and Changes in the Documents of the Salem Witchcraft Trials by Peter Grund 2007 This is the author’s accepted manuscript, post peer-review. The original published version can be found at the link below. Peter Grund. 2007. “The Anatomy of Correction: Additions, Cancellations, and Changes in the Documents of the Salem Witchcraft Trials.” Studia Neophilologica 79(1): 3–24. Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00393270701287439 Terms of Use: http://www2.ku.edu/~scholar/docs/license.shtml This work has been made available by the University of Kansas Libraries’ Office of Scholarly Communication and Copyright. Peter Grund. 2007. “The Anatomy of Correction: Additions, Cancellations, and Changes in the Documents of the Salem Witchcraft Trials.” Studia Neophilologica 79(1): 3–24. (accepted manuscript version, post-peer review) The Anatomy of Correction: Additions, Cancellations, and Changes in the Documents of the Salem Witchcraft Trials1 Peter Grund, Uppsala University 1. Introduction The Salem witchcraft trials of 1692 hold a special place in early American history. Though limited in comparison with many European witch persecutions, the Salem trials have reached mythical proportions, particularly in the United States. The some 1,000 extant documents from the trials and, in particular, the pre-trial hearings have been analyzed from various perspectives by (social) historians, anthropologists, biologists, medical doctors, literary scholars, and linguists (see e.g. Rosenthal 1993: 33–36; Mappen 1996; Grund, Kytö and Rissanen 2004: 146). But despite this intense interest in the trials, very little research has been carried out on the actual manuscript documents that have survived from the trials.
    [Show full text]
  • Lydia Prout's Dreadfullest Thought
    ✦✧✦✧✦✧✦✧✦✧✦✧✦✧✦✧✦✧✦✧✦✧✦✧✦✧✦✧✦✧✦✧✦✧✦ By arrangement with the Colonial Society of Massachusetts, the Editors of The New England Quarterly are pleased to publish the winning essay of the 2014 Walter Muir Whitehill Prize in Early American History Lydia Prout’s Dreadfullest Thought douglas l. winiarski N 20 October 1716 Lydia Prout retired to her bedcham- O ber, where she reflected on her two children, who had perished within four days of one another during the previous summer. Inscribing her thoughts in a private devotional journal, Prout acknowledged that her own iniquities had provoked God to chasten her family, and she “begg’d” him to “discover to me wherefore he was so terrible angry with me in taking away all my Children at once.” At the same time, however, she en- visioned her deceased son assuring her that he and his sister This essay began as a conference paper I presented to the American Studies Pro- gram at Indiana University (1996) and subsequently at the twelfth annual meeting of the Mid-America American Studies Association (1996), the annual meeting of the American Academy of Religion (1999), the Young Scholars in American Religion Pro- gram at Indiana University–Purdue University at Indianapolis (2003), the Fall Line Early Americanists reading group (2006), the twelfth annual conference of the Omo- hundro Institute of Early American History and Culture (2008), Hamilton College (2008), and the University of Connecticut Humanities Institute (2008). In addition to Linda Rhoads and the members of the Walter Muir Whitefield Prize committee—Fred Anderson, David Hall, and Mary Beth Norton—I wish to thank the many colleagues who have provided helpful criticism of this project during the past two decades: Dou- glas Ambrose, Roark Atkinson, Richard Brown, Robert Brown, Julie Byrne, Cornelia Dayton, Jonathan Elmer, Martha Finch, Kathleen Flake, Christopher Grasso, Robert Gross, Terri Halperin, Clarence Hardy, Woody Holton, Khyati Joshi, Edward Larkin, The New England Quarterly, vol.
    [Show full text]