SOMALI RELIEF and RECOVERY PROGRM-SRRP Somaliland

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

SOMALI RELIEF and RECOVERY PROGRM-SRRP Somaliland SOMALI RELIEF AND RECOVERY PROGRM-SRRP Somaliland, Puntland, Galmudug and Jubbaland States of Somalia Endline Assessment Report December 2020 This project was funded Implementing Partner by USAID/OFDA Kenya Nairobi 00200, - 54354 BOX P.O. Ltd Co. Consulting Rufmo by: Prepared 1 Table of Contents 0 LISTS OF TABLES ................................................................................................................ 1 0 LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................. 2 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 4 2 ENDLINE METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................... 6 3 ENDLINE EVALUATION FINDINGS ............................................................................... 12 3.1 DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION ..................................................................................................................... 12 3.2 RELEVANCE OF SRRP PROGRAMME .............................................................................................................. 14 3.2.1 Alignment to community priorities and consistency with the project goal ................... 14 3.3 EFFECTIVENESS OF PROGRAM INTERVENTIONS ........................................................................................... 17 3.3.1 Sector 1: Economic Recovery and Market systems-ERMS ..................................................... 17 3.3.2 Sector 2. Health ............................................................................................................................................... 26 3.3.3 Sector 3 -Humanitarian Coordination and Information Management........................... 34 3.3.4 Sector 4: Nutrition .......................................................................................................................................... 36 3.3.5 Sector 5 - Protection ..................................................................................................................................... 45 3.3.6 Sector 6 - Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WaSH) .................................................................... 50 3.4 FEEDBACK MECHANISMS ................................................................................................................................ 55 3.5 SUSTAINABILITY ............................................................................................................................................... 57 3.6 CONTRIBUTING FACTORS ............................................................................................................................. 58 3.7 ADAPTABILITY AND FLEXIBILITY .................................................................................................................... 59 3.8 SIMILAR INTERVENTIONS ................................................................................................................................ 59 3.9 EFFICIENCY ....................................................................................................................................................... 59 3.10 VALUE FOR MONEY ......................................................................................................................................... 59 3.11 INNOVATION ................................................................................................................................................... 60 4 CROSS-CUTTING ISSUES ................................................................................................ 60 5 LESSONS LEARNT ............................................................................................................. 60 6 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................................. 60 6.1 CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................................................................ 60 6.2 RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................................................................................................................... 62 7 ANNEXES ............................................................................................................................ 64 7.1 TOOLS ............................................................................................................................................................... 64 1 | P a g e 0 Lists of Tables Table 1: Quantitative Sample Distribution .................................................................................................................. 7 Table 2. Sampling methodology Summary ...................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Table 3:To what extent were the interventions relevant to your needs and priorities ................................ 15 Table 4: To what extent did the intervention(s) meet your expectations as a beneficiary? ......................... 16 Table 5: To what extent were you satisfied with the way the services were provided to you? .................. 16 Table 6: Household member engaged in Cash Assistance Program in the last 12 months ........................... 18 Table 7:Changes in Expenditure in the past one month ........................................................................................ 21 Table 8: Household Dietary Diversity Score ............................................................................................................ 22 Table 9: Livelihood coping Scores .................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Table 10: Household hunger scale ............................................................................................................................... 24 Table 11:Training attended or message received in the last 12 months ............................................................ 36 Table 12: Nutritional educational messages recalled ................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Table 13: Nutritional education message currently used/practiced .................................................................... 37 Table 14: In what ways has the nutritional educational message been beneficial to you and your household? ......................................................................................................................................................................... 37 Table 15: How useful has the nutrition education message been to you and your household? .................. 37 Table 16: Do you face any challenge implementing what you learnt? ................................................................. 38 Table 17: What challenges did you face in implementing what you learnt from the training? ...................... 38 Table 18: Was the OTP/TSFP treatment program accessible to all of the community members? ............. 38 Table 19: Was the design of the project appropriate for the community? ....................................................... 39 Table 20:During day and night yesterday, what did you give to your child? ............................................................... 39 Table 21: what was the main reason why you did not breastfeed? ..................................................................... 41 Table 22: Have you attended in the last 12 months IYCF counselling or nutrition, health and IYCF promotion and counselling? ............................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Table 23: If yes, how likely are you to practice what you learnt from IYCF counselling or training? ......... 42 Table 24: How important have such group been to you/your household during pregnancy or breastfeeding period? ...................................................................................................................................................... 42 Table 25: Have pregnant and lactating mothers in the area been able to receive treatment for malnutrition in the last 12 months? ............................................................................................................................. 42 Table 26: How effective were the nutrition programs targeting children with malnutrition in terms of treating them? ................................................................................................................................................................... 43 Table 27: Was the timing of the counselling appropriate? ......................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Table 28:Have you/member of your household visited a health center in the past 12 months? ........ Error! Bookmark not defined. Table 29: In your view how was/would you rate the services provision at the health facility? ........... Error! Bookmark not defined. Table 30:What are the working/opening hours for the health facility? ... Error! Bookmark not defined. Table 31:How long does it take you to walk to the nearest health facility for servicesError! Bookmark not defined. Table 32: your last visit at the heath facilities were you/your household able to get drugs and other medical supplies at the facility ............................................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. Table 33:Services household member receives during antenatal visit ..... Error! Bookmark not defined. Table 34: Where did you deliver
Recommended publications
  • An Analysis of the Afar-Somali Conflict in Ethiopia and Djibouti
    Regional Dynamics of Inter-ethnic Conflicts in the Horn of Africa: An Analysis of the Afar-Somali Conflict in Ethiopia and Djibouti DISSERTATION ZUR ERLANGUNG DER GRADES DES DOKTORS DER PHILOSOPHIE DER UNIVERSTÄT HAMBURG VORGELEGT VON YASIN MOHAMMED YASIN from Assab, Ethiopia HAMBURG 2010 ii Regional Dynamics of Inter-ethnic Conflicts in the Horn of Africa: An Analysis of the Afar-Somali Conflict in Ethiopia and Djibouti by Yasin Mohammed Yasin Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree PHILOSOPHIAE DOCTOR (POLITICAL SCIENCE) in the FACULITY OF BUSINESS, ECONOMICS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES at the UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG Supervisors Prof. Dr. Cord Jakobeit Prof. Dr. Rainer Tetzlaff HAMBURG 15 December 2010 iii Acknowledgments First and foremost, I would like to thank my doctoral fathers Prof. Dr. Cord Jakobeit and Prof. Dr. Rainer Tetzlaff for their critical comments and kindly encouragement that made it possible for me to complete this PhD project. Particularly, Prof. Jakobeit’s invaluable assistance whenever I needed and his academic follow-up enabled me to carry out the work successfully. I therefore ask Prof. Dr. Cord Jakobeit to accept my sincere thanks. I am also grateful to Prof. Dr. Klaus Mummenhoff and the association, Verein zur Förderung äthiopischer Schüler und Studenten e. V., Osnabruck , for the enthusiastic morale and financial support offered to me in my stay in Hamburg as well as during routine travels between Addis and Hamburg. I also owe much to Dr. Wolbert Smidt for his friendly and academic guidance throughout the research and writing of this dissertation. Special thanks are reserved to the Department of Social Sciences at the University of Hamburg and the German Institute for Global and Area Studies (GIGA) that provided me comfortable environment during my research work in Hamburg.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment Report 2011
    ASSESSMENT REPORT 2011 PHASE 1 - PEACE AND RECONCILIATION JOIN- TOGETHER ACTION For Galmudug, Himan and Heb, Galgaduud and Hiiraan Regions, Somalia Yme/NorSom/GSA By OMAR SALAD BSc (HONS.) DIPSOCPOL, DIPGOV&POL Consultant, in collaboration with HØLJE HAUGSJÅ (program Manager Yme) and MOHAMED ELMI SABRIE JAMALLE (Director NorSom). 1 Table of Contents Pages Summary of Findings, Analysis and Assessment 5-11 1. Introduction 5 2. Common Geography and History Background of the Central Regions 5 3. Political, Administrative Governing Structures and Roles of Central Regions 6 4. Urban Society and Clan Dynamics 6 5. Impact of Piracy on the Economic, Social and Security Issues 6 6. Identification of Possibility of Peace Seeking Stakeholders in Central Regions 7 7. Identification of Stakeholders and Best Practices of Peace-building 9 8. How Conflicts resolved and peace Built between People Living Together According 9 to Stakeholders 9. What Causes Conflicts Both locally and regional/Central? 9 10. Best Practices of Ensuring Women participation in the process 9 11. Best Practices of organising a Peace Conference 10 12. Relations Between Central Regions and Between them TFG 10 13. Table 1: Organisation, Ownership and Legal Structure of the 10 14. Peace Conference 10 15. Conclusion 11 16. Recap 11 16.1 Main Background Points 16.2 Recommendations 16.3 Expected Outcomes of a Peace Conference Main and Detailed Report Page 1. Common geography and History Background of Central Regions 13 1.1 Overview geographical and Environmental Situation 13 1.2 Common History and interdependence 14 1.3 Chronic Neglect of Central Regions 15 1.4 Correlation Between neglect and conflict 15 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Historical Climate Baseline Statistics for Somaliland, Puntland
    Report on Historical Climate Baseline Statistics for Somaliland, Puntland, Vol 4 Galmudug and Hirshabelle ACKNOWLEDGMENT The report was prepared with substantial inputs and feedback from Somalia Meteorological Service, IGAD Climate Prediction and Application Center with support from the African Development Bank. Analysis of climate change data and drafting of the report was made possible with inputs from Linda A. Ogallo and Abdirashid Jama. Historical Climate Baseline Statistics for Somaliland, Puntland, Galmudug and Hirshabelle 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................................................ iii LIST OF TABLES .......................................................................................................................................................... vi 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................... 7 2. THE STUDY SITE .................................................................................................................................................. 9 2.1 DATA ................................................................................................................................................................ 9 3. BASELINE STATISTICS ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • DJIBOUTI: Implementing the 10- Point Plan of Action
    DJIBOUTI: Implementing the 10- Point Plan of Action Djibouti has always been a favoured destination for migrants and refugees from countries in the region, notably Ethiopia, Eritrea, and Somalia. The migrant population is estimated to represent 20 per cent of the total population of the country. The Djiboutian population shares strong ethnic links (Somali, Afar) with Somaliland, Ethiopia, Eritrea, and Yemen, which explains the migratory movements between these countries. Djibouti has been described as an oasis of peace in a stormy desert, in a sub region rife with insecurity: the ongoing threat of a border war between Eritrean and Ethiopia, the continuing battle between supporters of the Government in Somalia and the supporters of the opposition Islamists, and the recent turmoil in Kenya. The economic and political stability in the country has attracted thousands of impoverished people in search of better economic prospects. The situation took a new twist over the past two to three years with the increased use of Djibouti as a transit country by smugglers and traffickers en route to the Arab Gulf States and to Europe. The country’s proximity to more prosperous countries in the Arab Gulf and the hope to continue their journey to more developed western countries has therefore equally worked as a pull factor for migrants. During the first months of 2008, a large number of migrants and refugees chose the route by boat to Yemen via Djibouti as an alternative to exposure to reckless smugglers in Bossaso, Somalia. Since January 2008, 2,213 new arrivals from South/Central Somalia have been registered by UNHCR, the peak being in February with 1,100 persons (Jan: 251; Mar: 862).
    [Show full text]
  • Somalia and Somaliland: the Two Edged Sword of International Intervention Kenning, David
    www.ssoar.info Somalia and Somaliland: the two edged sword of international intervention Kenning, David Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Kenning, D. (2011). Somalia and Somaliland: the two edged sword of international intervention. Federal Governance, 8(2), 63-70. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-342769 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer Basic Digital Peer Publishing-Lizenz This document is made available under a Basic Digital Peer zur Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den DiPP-Lizenzen Publishing Licence. For more Information see: finden Sie hier: http://www.dipp.nrw.de/lizenzen/dppl/service/dppl/ http://www.dipp.nrw.de/lizenzen/dppl/service/dppl/ Special Issue on Federalism and Conflict Management edited by Neophytos Loizides, Iosif Kovras and Kathleen Ireton. SOMALIA AND SOMALILAND: THE TWO EDGED SWORD OF INTERNATIONAL INTERVENTION by David Kenning* * Queen’s University Belfast, Ireland Email: [email protected] Abstract: Since the collapse of the state in Somalia in 1991 the country has been the recipient of numerous international interventions and operations but has not as yet reached a sustainable peaceful settlement, despite at one point costing the UN almost two billion dollars a year in its operations. In contrast Somaliland, the area that seceded in the north, despite not being recognised by international governments and having been on the brink of several civil wars, has reached a level of political reconciliation and economic growth that compares favourably to the rest of Somalia. This article argues that the international actors’ misinterpretation of Somali social and political organisation during intervention, Somaliland’s ability to engage in a form of democracy that is based on traditional politics and the different experience the area had during colonialism has meant that its society has reached an unlikely level of peace and reconciliation.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking the Somali State
    Rethinking the Somali State MPP Professional Paper In Partial Fulfillment of the Master of Public Policy Degree Requirements The Hubert H. Humphrey School of Public Affairs The University of Minnesota Aman H.D. Obsiye May 2017 Signature below of Paper Supervisor certifies successful completion of oral presentation and completion of final written version: _________________________________ ____________________ ___________________ Dr. Mary Curtin, Diplomat in Residence Date, oral presentation Date, paper completion Paper Supervisor ________________________________________ ___________________ Steven Andreasen, Lecturer Date Second Committee Member Signature of Second Committee Member, certifying successful completion of professional paper Table of Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 3 Methodology .......................................................................................................................... 5 The Somali Clan System .......................................................................................................... 6 The Colonial Era ..................................................................................................................... 9 British Somaliland Protectorate ................................................................................................. 9 Somalia Italiana and the United Nations Trusteeship .............................................................. 14 Colonial
    [Show full text]
  • Mixed Migration in the Horn of Africa
    U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Daniel Barker MIXED MIGRATION HORN OF AFRICA IOM IN ACTION “THIS PROJECT AIMS rights violations, food • Over 100 coastguards from TO ENHANCE THE insecurity and desire Djibouti, Somaliland and PROTECTION OF for better economic MMTF Puntland have received MIGRANTS FROM SOUTH opportunities. These are strategy capacity building skills to CENTRAL SOMALIA AND the features that gives enhance protection for and ETHIOPIA WHO TRAVEL these movements its recommends help save migrant lives. THROUGH ETHIOPIA, “mixed” character. Many an expansion • Over 50 immigration officials SOMALILAND, PUNTLAND migrants die during the of coordinated from Djibouti, Somaliland AND DJIBOUTI THROUGH journey, while others are humanitarian and Puntland were trained THE GULF OF ADEN TO subjected to abuse at the interventions in order in the latest immigration YEMEN.” hands of smugglers. to improve human rights procedures. protection for migrants • IOM has provided Assisted The Overview To address the protection and refugees. Voluntary Return and Every year, tens of problems faced by the Reintegration (AVR) for thousands of migrants Ethiopian and Somali IOM response migrants in Somaliland and and refugees make the migrants, internally IOM focuses its response Puntland especially the hazardous journey from displaced persons and both on the identification most vulnerable, including their place of origin asylum seekers, a Mixed and combat of irregular women, (unaccompanied) (primarily the Ogaden, Migration Task Force
    [Show full text]
  • Puntland Report 2020
    Puntland Report 2020 Somali Health and Demographic Survey The information contained in this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior permission but with acknowledgement of this publication as a source. Suggested citation: Puntland Statistics Department, Puntland State of Somalia. The Puntland Health and Demographic Survey 2020. Additional information about the survey can be obtained from: Puntland Statistics Department, Ministry of Planning, Economic Development and International Cooperation, Puntland State of Somalia. Email: [email protected] Website: http://www.mopicplgov.net https://www.moh.pl.so http://www.pl.statistics.so Telephone no.: +252 906796747 or 00-252-5-843114 Social media: https://www.facebook.com/mopicpl https://www.facebook.com/ministryOfHealthPuntlamd/ https://twitter.com/PSD_MoPIC This report was produced by the Puntland State of Somalia, with support from the United Nations Population Fund, Somalia and key donors. Puntland Report 2020 Somali Health and Demographic Survey With technical support from: With financial contribution from: Puntland Report 2020 IV Somali Health and Demographic Survey (SHDS) V Acknowledgments The Puntland Health and Demographic Survey (PLHDS) was realized with the commitment and dedication of several organizations and individuals. The Department of Statistics of the Ministry of Planning, Economic Development and International cooperation (MoPEDIC) and
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19 Update
    Series: 03 MINISTRY OF PLANNING, INVESTMENT AND Somalia as of 23rd June ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MINISTRY OF PLANNING, INVESTMENT AND 2020 COVID-19 cases: 2835 Directorate of National Statistics ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Deaths: 90 Directorate of National Statistics Recoveries: 829 Recoveries: 486 Number of confirmed cases per state: Somaliland: 682 Puntland: 282 Hiirshabelle: 24 CORONOVIRUS (COVID-19) Update South West: 142 Reported period 10th June – 23rf June, 2020 Galmudug: 118 Jubaland: 176 Benadir: 1411 Key Summary Indicators There are 2835 confirmed cases in Somalia with 90 deaths and 829 recoveries 50% of the confirmed COVID 19 cases in the country are in Benadir Regional Administration 72% of the confirmed COVID 19 cases are Hotline Numbers for COVID-19 males, and 28% are females Please call if you are in: COVID-19 has claimed the lives of 3 persons for every 100 confirmed cases in Somalia Galmudug: 449 Somaliland:988 Puntland: 343 Jubaland: 466 Benadir: 449 Southwest:449 Ministry of Planning, Investment and Economic Development Directorate of National Statistics Number of confirmed cases, FIGURE 1: COVID-19 EVENTS Actives cases, Recoveries, NUMBER OF CONFIR M ED CASES , ACTIVES CASES, and Deaths in Somalia RECOVERIES, AND DEATHS IN SOM ALIA As of 23rd of June 2020, the 2835 number of confirmed cases are 2835 with 829 recoveries and 90 deaths. In addition, 1916 the active cases are 1916 as shown in Figure1 829 90 CONFIRMED ACTIVE CASES RECOVERIES DEATHS CASES Percentage Distribution of COVID 19 Figure 2: Percentage distribution of confirmed cases by State Confirmed Cases by State Hiirshabelle Galmudug Jubaland 1% Approximately 50 percent of the confirmed 4% COVID-19 cases in the country are in 6% Banaadir Region whereas the remaining (24 South West percent) are from Somaliland, Puntland (10 5% percent), Jubbaland (6 percent), South West (5 percent), Galmudug (4 percent) and Hirshabelle State (1 percent) as shown in Benadir (Figure 2).
    [Show full text]
  • Peace in Puntland: Mapping the Progress Democratization, Decentralization, and Security and Rule of Law
    Peace in Puntland: Mapping the Progress Democratization, Decentralization, and Security and Rule of Law Pillars of Peace Somali Programme Garowe, November 2015 Acknowledgment This Report was prepared by the Puntland Development Re- search Center (PDRC) and the Interpeace Regional Office for Eastern and Central Africa. Lead Researchers Research Coordinator: Ali Farah Ali Security and Rule of Law Pillar: Ahmed Osman Adan Democratization Pillar: Mohamoud Ali Said, Hassan Aden Mo- hamed Decentralization Pillar: Amina Mohamed Abdulkadir Audio and Video Unit: Muctar Mohamed Hersi Research Advisor Abdirahman Osman Raghe Editorial Support Peter W. Mackenzie, Peter Nordstrom, Jessamy Garver- Affeldt, Jesse Kariuki and Claire Elder Design and Layout David Müller Printer Kul Graphics Ltd Front cover photo: Swearing-in of Galkayo Local Council. Back cover photo: Mother of slain victim reaffirms her com- mittment to peace and rejection of revenge killings at MAVU film forum in Herojalle. ISBN: 978-9966-1665-7-9 Copyright: Puntland Development Research Center (PDRC) Published: November 2015 This report was produced by the Puntland Development Re- search Center (PDRC) with the support of Interpeace and represents exclusively their own views. These views have not been adopted or in any way approved by the contribut- ing donors and should not be relied upon as a statement of the contributing donors or their services. The contributing donors do not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this report, nor do they accept responsibility for any use
    [Show full text]
  • Djibouti: Z Z Z Z Summary Points Z Z Z Z Renewal Ofdomesticpoliticallegitimacy
    briefing paper page 1 Djibouti: Changing Influence in the Horn’s Strategic Hub David Styan Africa Programme | April 2013 | AFP BP 2013/01 Summary points zz Change in Djibouti’s economic and strategic options has been driven by four factors: the Ethiopian–Eritrean war of 1998–2000, the impact of Ethiopia’s economic transformation and growth upon trade; shifts in US strategy since 9/11, and the upsurge in piracy along the Gulf of Aden and Somali coasts. zz With the expansion of the US AFRICOM base, the reconfiguration of France’s military presence and the establishment of Japanese and other military facilities, Djibouti has become an international maritime and military laboratory where new forms of cooperation are being developed. zz Djibouti has accelerated plans for regional economic integration. Building on close ties with Ethiopia, existing port upgrades and electricity grid integration will be enhanced by the development of the northern port of Tadjourah. zz These strategic and economic shifts have yet to be matched by internal political reforms, and growth needs to be linked to strategies for job creation and a renewal of domestic political legitimacy. www.chathamhouse.org Djibouti: Changing Influence in the Horn’s Strategic Hub page 2 Djibouti 0 25 50 km 0 10 20 30 mi Red Sea National capital District capital Ras Doumeira Town, village B Airport, airstrip a b Wadis ERITREA a l- M International boundary a n d District boundary a b Main road Railway Moussa Ali ETHIOPIA OBOCK N11 N11 To Elidar Balho Obock N14 TADJOURA N11 N14 Gulf of Aden Tadjoura N9 Galafi Lac Assal Golfe de Tadjoura N1 N9 N9 Doraleh DJIBOUTI N1 Ghoubbet Arta N9 El Kharab DJIBOUTI N9 N1 DIKHIL N5 N1 N1 ALI SABIEH N5 N5 Abhe Bad N1 (Lac Abhe) Ali Sabieh DJIBOUTI Dikhil N5 To Dire Dawa SOMALIA/ ETHIOPIA SOMALILAND Source: United Nations Department of Field Support, Cartographic Section, Djibouti Map No.
    [Show full text]
  • Somalia - United States Department of State
    Somalia - United States Department of State https://www.state.gov/reports/2020-trafficking-in-persons-report/somalia/ Somalia remains a Special Case for the 18th consecutive year. The country continued to face protracted conflict, insecurity, and ongoing humanitarian crises during the reporting period. The Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) controlled its capital city, Mogadishu, and Federal Member State (FMS) governments retained control over most local capitals across the country. The self-declared independent region of Somaliland and the Puntland FMS retained control of security and law enforcement in their respective regions. The FGS had limited influence outside Mogadishu. The al-Shabaab terrorist group continued to occupy and control rural areas and maintained operational freedom of movement in many other areas in south-central Somalia, which it used as a base to exploit the local population by collecting illegal taxes, conducting indiscriminate attacks against civilian and civilian infrastructure across the country, and perpetrating human trafficking. The FGS focused on capacity building and securing Mogadishu and government facilities from attacks by al-Shabaab. The sustained insurgency by al-Shabaab continued to be the main obstacle to the government’s ability to address human trafficking. The government continued to modestly improve capacity to address most crimes; however, it demonstrated minimal efforts in all regions on prosecution, protection, and prevention of trafficking during the reporting year. The FGS, Somaliland, and Puntland authorities sustained minimal efforts to combat trafficking during the reporting period. Due to the protracted campaign to degrade al-Shabaab and establish law and order in Somalia, law enforcement, prosecutorial personnel, and judicial offices remained understaffed, undertrained, and lacked capacity to effectively enforce anti-trafficking laws.
    [Show full text]