Insight-No18.Pdf
IRPP Sovereignty at an Impasse Insight The Highs and Lows of Quebec Nationalism October 2017 | No. 18 Jean-Herman Guay Summary ■■ Although dissatisfied with its constitutional status, the Quebec nation has said “no” to sovereignty. ■■ Several factors explain this, including the significant economic, social and cultural progress realized since the 1960s — in part a result of policies championed by the sovereignty movement. ■■ Above all, many Quebecers are ambivalent about their situation within Canada because, when the pros and cons are weighed, the scale never tips clearly to one side. Sommaire ■■ Même s’il est insatisfait sur le plan constitutionnel, le Québec a dit non à la souveraineté. ■■ Plusieurs facteurs expliquent ce rejet, notamment l’ampleur des progrès économiques, sociaux et culturels accomplis depuis les années 1960, en partie grâce aux politiques défendues par les souverainistes. ■■ Fondamentalement, de nombreux Québécois restent ambivalents à l’égard de leur situation à l’intérieur du Canada, car la balance des avantages et des désavantages ne penche jamais clairement d’un même côté. OVER THE PAST 50 YEARS, Quebec has repeatedly presented the rest of the country with an ultimatum: “Give us more, or we’re leaving!” After two Quebec refer- endums (in 1980 and 1995) and a national referendum (1992), after countless constitutional conferences, reports and debates that dominated Canada’s polit- ical landscape for more than a generation, a vexing contradiction has emerged: Quebec remains dissatisfied, and yet it hasn’t left! Clearly, Quebec has not achieved its goals. None of the 10 Quebec premiers since the patriation of the Canadian Constitution from London in 1982 has been willing to sign it.
[Show full text]