• Abstract and Figures
• Public Full-text

Johnston, P 2013 Exploring Ghost Worlds: A Review of The Daniel Clowes THE COMICS GRID Reader. The Comics Grid: Journal of Comics Scholarship, 3(1): 7, pp. 1-5, Journal of comics scholarship DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/cg.ag REVIEW Exploring Ghost Worlds: A Review of The Daniel Clowes Reader The Daniel Clowes Reader, Ken Parille, Softcover: 360 pages, Colour and black & white, Fantagraphics, 2013, ISBN: 9781606995891 Paddy Johnston* Daniel Clowes is undoubtedly one of the most influen- tial and prolific cartoonists working today, with a career spanning many decades. The Daniel Clowes Reader (Parille 2013) comes at the perfect time – when interest in Clowes from scholars and critics is at a high, but in which he is still perhaps given less critical attention than his peers Chris Ware, Art Spiegelman, and Marjane Satrapi, all of whom are cited twice as often as Clowes despite his large canon of significant works in comics. With recent books being published on Chris Ware by The University Press of Mississippi and the forthcoming Art Spiegelman collec- tion from Drawn and Quarterly, more significant focused, monographic books are emerging in comics and comics criticism, and The Daniel Clowes Reader is a more than wel- come addition to this emergence. Rather than providing an exhaustive chronological ret- rospective, as it would be tempting to do with such a vol- ume, the book is organised into three sections based on distinct areas of discussion which provide thematic arcs: section one explores Girls and Adolescence, focusing on Clowes’ landmark graphic novel Ghost World; section two explores Boys and Post-Adolescence using some of Clowes’ short stories from Eightball; and section three explores the broader and more fluid areas of Comics, Artists and Audiences, including Clowes’ illustrated manifesto, “Mod- ern Cartoonist,” which originally accompanied Eightball #18 as an attached pamphlet in 1997. The book’s editor, Ken Parille, has curated the book meticulously, which is unsurprising given he is a col- umnist for The Comics Journal and an expert on Clowes Parille, K. ed. (2013) The Daniel Clowes Reader (Seattle, WA: – he was central to both of the other significant books Fantagraphics, cover) on Clowes, as a contributor to The Art of Daniel Clowes: Modern Cartoonist (Buenaventura 2012), and the inter- and experience Clowes’ best comics and providing com- view collection Daniel Clowes: Conversations (Cates and mentary, reflection and enlightening annotation, as well Parille 2010), part of the University Press of Mississippi’s as some scholarly essays and revealing interviews with Conversations with Comics Artists series which incudes Clowes himself. collected interviews with Carl Barks, Will Eisner, and Art The book’s emphasis is on its inclusion of on Ghost Spiegelman, among others. The Daniel Clowes Reader is, World, which is reproduced in full (with the introduction of course, a Clowes collection first and foremost, but it from the 2008 special edition) and makes for a welcome strikes the balance between inviting the reader to enjoy centerpiece, being Clowes’ most significant and influen- tial work. I found the most useful and stimulating essays in the collection to be those which immediately follow * University of Sussex, United Kingdom Ghost World, most significantly Pamela Thurschwell’s dis- [email protected] cussion of adolescence as a ghost world and Ken Parille’s Art. 7, page 2 of 5 Johnston: Exploring Ghost Worlds Parille, K. ed. (2013) The Daniel Clowes Reader (Seattle, WA: Fantagraphics, 118, 1–7) close-reading of Ghost World’s dialogue. Thurschwell’s to Rebecca, who cannot hear her as she is behind the glass essay will no doubt be of use to literary critics and com- window of one of the many dilapidated diners that popu- ics scholars who wish to discuss comics as literature, as late their suburban town. she reads Ghost World in relation to postmodernism and By focusing on this line, Parille reminds us that Clowes capitalism, exploring how these create the ghost world of has a gift for dialogue and is a talented writer as well as a the protagonists, Enid and Rebecca. Parille’s close reading cartoonist, having collaborated with Terry Zwigoff closely of Ghost World’s dialogue focuses on the final line, “You’ve on the script for the film adaptations of Ghost World and grown into a very beautiful young woman,” said by Enid “Art School Confidential,” which is the centerpiece of Johnston: Exploring Ghost Worlds Art. 7, page 3 of 5 Parille, K. ed. (2013) The Daniel Clowes Reader (Seattle, WA: Fantagraphics, 291, 1–4) section three. It might perhaps have been interesting to more than adequate detail to historicise Clowes’ comics include some of Clowes’ script work or further notes on and place them in the context of the various cultural move- his work on film to further examine his skill as a writer, as ments which they explore and portray. The many pages this is only really explored in the interviews with Clowes, of annotations accompanying Ghost World, for example, who talks of working in film as an enjoyable collaboration, are largely a catalogue of the music, literature and kitschy distanced from the solitary occupation of cartooning. objects Enid uses to find and create her identity, from There is certainly very little feeling of omission from sec- Sonic Youth to Bruce Lee to zines, poetry collections, and tion one, though. The annotations, in particular, provide extremely outdated children’s records. Too much atten- Art. 7, page 4 of 5 Johnston: Exploring Ghost Worlds tion, however, is paid to Enid’s bookshelf, with the discus- and put on art school notice boards, (2013: 290) I would sion of Ghost World being interrupted by reproductions have liked to have seen an essay or two follow the comic of Russell Edson’s poems and Ann Roy’s cartoons. These in a similar fashion to those which follow Ghost World in inclusions do allow the reader to enter Enid’s world on a section one – instead, we are given only a single page of more personal level, but this isn’t strictly necessary, as the short annotations. annotations are detailed enough to provide this, and the In fact, the lack of essays makes section three feel some- reader could discover Ann Roy for themselves if there was what short and stunted. I would have liked to have read sufficient interest in her work after reading through the Ken Parille, Joshua Glenn’s or any of the other contribu- annotations. tors’ thoughts on Clowes’ relationship with his audience The same could perhaps have be said of the inclusion and his portrayal of art school. The one essay in section of excerpts from Gilmore Tamny’s zine, Wiglet, although three, by Anne Mallory and Ken Parille, is a significant one; these are more closely related to Clowes’ comics and are however, and a welcome discussion of the “Ugly” aesthetic more significant as they follow an intriguing brief history which pervades throughout Clowes’ comics and which is of the rise of the zine by Kaya Oakes. Clowes’ relationship a significant part of his unique style. My feelings towards with the zine culture of the late eighties and nineties and this section, however, are likely due to the high quality of its expressions of artistic freedom and independence is the essays and discussion of Ghost World in section one, explored throughout the Reader, and offers significant which I would have liked to have seen replicated in sec- detail and insight into the cultures and countercultures tions two and three. I realise, of course, that this would which Clowes has depicted and engaged with on many have made for a much lengthier book and tipped it into levels throughout his career. the realm of impenetrability, and that the book’s tagline Joshua Glenn’s essay, “Against Groovy,” picks this up in (“A critical edition of Ghost World and other stories, with section two, following a number of Clowes’ short stories essays, interviews and annotations”) is quite clear about which depict the apathy and often misplaced irony of its focus on Ghost World, so my wish for a greater sec- Generation X. Glenn draws the distinction between “Origi- tion three is no indication of failure on the editor’s part nal Generation X” (those born 1954–1963, following the – rather, a desire for more discussion and scholarship “Boomers”) and the “Generation X” label applied to the around Clowes, spurred by the quality of section one. slacker culture of the eighties, placing Clowes in the for- The Daniel Clowes Reader is enjoyable and stimulating mer camp whilst discussing how Clowes satirises both the from beginning to end, and collects Clowes’ most signifi- original and the second Generation X. The short stories cant works with careful curation. The interviews, essays “Blue Italian Shit” and “Like A Weed, Joe” depict the earlier and annotations are more than relevant, and provide a generation, with their post-punk nihilist Roger Young as a level of detail unparalleled in any other available book on fitting microcosm, while the later comics “The Party” and Daniel Clowes, aside from the aforementioned Conversa- “Buddy Bradley in Who Would You Rather Fuck: Ginger tions and The Art of Daniel Clowes, without overwhelming or Mary Ann?” depict the grunge-influenced check-shirted the inclusion of Clowes’ comics. Ken Parille’s curation and slackers of the late eighties-early nineties as similarly editing is first-rate, and his love of Clowes’ work is clear, failed ironists. Clowes has a wealth of comics with anti- but despite this he manages to retain a careful critical eye, hipster sentiment and depictions of the flaws and foibles as evidenced in his essays and commentary.

Load more

  5

Copy Link