DOCSLIB.ORG

Production and Quality of Sap from the Bigleaf Maple (Acer Macrophyllum Marsh) on Vancouver Island, British Columbia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Production and Quality of Sap from the Bigleaf Maple (Acer Macrophyllum Marsh) on Vancouver Island, British Columbia Production and quality of sap from the bigleaf maple (Acer macrophyllum Marsh) on Vancouver Island, British Columbia By Deirdre Bruce B.Sc. in Forestry, University of British Columbia, 2003 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in the Department of Geography Deirdre Bruce, 2008 University of Victoria All rights reserved. This thesis may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without the permission of the author. ii Production and quality of sap from the bigleaf maple (Acer macrophyllum Marsh) on Vancouver Island, British Columbia By Deirdre Bruce B.Sc. in Forestry, University of British Columbia, 2003 Supervisory Com m ittee Dr. Dan Smith, Co-Supervisor (Department of Geography) Dr. W illiam W agner, Co-Supervisor (Department of Geography) Dr. Dave Duffus , Supervisory Committee Member (Department of Geography) Dr. Simon Shamoun, External Examiner (Pacific Forestry Centre) ii iii Supervisory Committee Dr. Dan Smith, Co-Supervisor (Department of Geography) Dr. W illiam W agner, Co-Supervisor (Department of Geography) Dr. Dave Duffus , Supervisory Committee Member (Department of Geography) Dr. Simon Shamoun, External Examiner (Pacific Forestry Centre) Abstract Bigleaf maple tapping has become increasingly popular on Vancouver Island and additional information is needed to assist in the sustainable development of this non- timber forest product. This research is an exploratory study that investigates sap flow in the 2006/2007 season on Vancouver Island, British Columbia. Sap flow was highly variable throughout the season. Fluctuations in air temperature, above and below zero, were shown to trigger sap flow. This study characterizes the dissolved solid components of the sap and syrup collected during the 2006/2007 season. The carbohydrate content of the bigleaf maple sap is mainly sucrose with a minor component of fructose and glucose. The concentration of carbohydrates varied throughout the season. The main cations in the bigleaf maple sap and syrup are calcium, potassium and magnesium. iii iv Table of Contents Supervisory Committee ................................................................................................ ii Abstract........................................................................................................................iii Table of Contents......................................................................................................... iv List of Figures.............................................................................................................. vi List of Tables .............................................................................................................. vii Acknowledgments......................................................................................................viii Dedication..................................................................................................................... x Chapter One: Introduction ............................................................................................ 1 1.1 Introduction......................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Forestry in British Columbia .............................................................................. 1 1.3 The Potential of Non-timber Forest Products ..................................................... 4 1.4 British Columbia Forest Policy........................................................................... 7 1.5 Objectives of The Study...................................................................................... 9 1.6 References......................................................................................................... 10 Chapter Two: Research Background .......................................................................... 13 2.1 Description of the Bigleaf Maple...................................................................... 13 2.2 Geographic Distribution.................................................................................... 15 2.3 Habitat............................................................................................................... 19 2.4 Bigleaf Maple Regeneration ............................................................................. 20 2.5 Ecological Importance of the Bigleaf Maple.................................................... 21 2.6 Cultural Importance of the Bigleaf Maple to Coastal First Nations ................. 24 2.7 Bigleaf Maple Management.............................................................................. 24 2.71 Bigleaf Maple Control ................................................................................ 28 2.8 Timber Uses...................................................................................................... 31 2.9 Non-timber Uses ............................................................................................... 32 2.10 Maple Physiology ........................................................................................... 33 2.11 Maple Carbohydrates and Cations.................................................................. 34 2.12 References....................................................................................................... 37 Chapter Three: Yield and Characteristics of Bigleaf Maple Sap............................... 41 3.1 Introduction to Sap Flow Characteristics.......................................................... 41 3.2 Methods............................................................................................................. 43 3.2.1 Study Sites and Plot Selection ................................................................... 44 3.2.2 Sap Flow Measurement.............................................................................. 47 3.2.3 Climate Data .............................................................................................. 49 3.2.4 Soil Analysis .............................................................................................. 49 3.2.5 Data Analysis............................................................................................. 51 3.3 Results and Discussion ..................................................................................... 52 3.3.1 Sap Flow and Air Temperature.................................................................. 52 3.3.2 Seasonal and Monthly Flows..................................................................... 56 3.3.3 Soil Type and Flow.................................................................................... 60 3.3.4 Diameter at Breast Height (DBH) and Flow.............................................. 63 3.3.5 Edge Versus Non-Edge and Flow.............................................................. 65 3.5.6 Sap Flow Model......................................................................................... 66 iv v 3.4 Limitations ........................................................................................................ 67 3.5 Conclusions....................................................................................................... 68 3.6 References......................................................................................................... 70 Chapter Four: Chemical Analysis of Bigleaf Maple Sap and Syrup .......................... 72 4.1 Introduction....................................................................................................... 72 4.2 Methods............................................................................................................. 73 4.3 Results and Discussion ..................................................................................... 76 4.3.1 Bigleaf Maple Sap Carbohydrates and Cations ......................................... 76 4.3.2 Bigleaf Maple Syrup Carbohydrates and Cations...................................... 80 4.4 Limitations ........................................................................................................ 84 4.5 Conclusions....................................................................................................... 84 4.6 References......................................................................................................... 86 Chapter Five: Summary .............................................................................................. 88 5.1 Summary of Research....................................................................................... 88 5.2 Social Benefits of Syrup Production................................................................. 89 5.3 Tapping into the Economic Benefits................................................................. 92 5.4 Future Research and Forest Management Recommendations.......................... 96 5.5 References......................................................................................................... 99 Appendix 1................................................................................................................ 101 Vita............................................................................................................................ 102 v vi List of Figures Figure 1. Bigleaf maple flowers.................................................................................. 15 Figure 2. The native range of bigleaf maple trees (modified from Minore & Zasada 1990). .........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bigleaf Maple Decline in Western Washington
    Bigleaf Maple Decline in Western Washington Jacob J. Betzen A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science University of Washington 2018 Committee: Patrick Tobin Gregory Ettl Brian Harvey Robert Harrison Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Environmental and Forest Sciences © Copyright 2018 Jacob Betzen University of Washington Abstract Bigleaf Maple Decline in Western Washington Jacob J. Betzen Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Professor Patrick Tobin School of Environmental and Forest Sciences Bigleaf maple (Acer macrophyllum Pursh) is a prominent component of the urban and suburban landscape in Western Washington, which lies at the heart of the native range of A. macrophyllum. Acer macrophyllum performs many important ecological, economic, and cultural functions, and its decline in the region could have cascading impacts. In 2011, increases in A. macrophyllum mortality were documented throughout the distributional range of the species. Symptoms of this decline included a systemic loss of vigor, loss of transpiration, and a reduction in photosynthetic potential, but did not display any signs or symptoms indicative of a specific causative agent. No pathogenic microbes, insects, or other biotic agents were initially implicated in causing or predisposing A. macrophyllum to decline. In my thesis research, I quantified the spatial extent and severity of A. macrophyllum decline in the urban, suburban, and wildland forests of western Washington, identified potential abiotic and biotic disturbance agents that are contributing to the decline, and conducted a dendrochronological analysis to ascertain the timing of the decline. I surveyed 22 sites that were previously reported as containing declining A. macrophyllum, and sampled 156 individual A.
    [Show full text]
  • BIGLEAF MAPLE Evening Grosbeaks, Chipmunks, Mice, and a Variety of Birds
    Plant Guide Wildlife: The seeds provide food for squirrels, BIGLEAF MAPLE evening grosbeaks, chipmunks, mice, and a variety of birds. Elk and deer browse the young twigs, leaves, Acer macrophyllum Pursh and saplings. Plant Symbol = ACMA3 Agroforestry: Bigleaf maple can be planted on sites Contributed By: USDA NRCS National Plant Data infected with laminated rot for site rehabilitation. It Center can also accelerate nutrient cycling, site productivity, revegetate disturbed riparian areas, and contribute to long-term sustainability. Status Please consult the PLANTS Web site and your State Department of Natural Resources for this plant’s current status, such as, state noxious status, and wetland indicator values. Description General: Maple Family (Aceraceae). Bigleaf maple is a native, long-lived medium to large sized deciduous tree that often grows to eighty feet tall. The leaves are simple, opposite, and very large between fifteen to thirty centimeters wide and almost as long (Farrar 1995). The flowers are yellow, Brother Alfred Brousseau © Saint Mary's College fragrant, and produced in noddling racemes @ CalPhotos appearing with the leaves in April or May. The fruit is paired, 2.5 - 4 centimeters long, and brown with Alternative Names stiff yellowish hair. The bark is smooth and gray- Oregon maple, broad leaf maple, big-leaf maple brown on young stems, becoming red-brown and deeply fissured, and broken into scales on the surface Uses (Preston 1989). Ethnobotanic: The inner bark was often dried and ground into a powder and then used as a thickener in Distribution: Acer macrophyllum is distributed soups or mixed with cereals when mixing bread.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Priority Plant and Animal Species in Oregon Forests
    A GUIDE TO Priority Plant and Animal Species IN OREGON FORESTS A publication of the Oregon Forest Resources Institute Sponsors of the first animal and plant guidebooks included the Oregon Department of Forestry, the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, the Oregon Biodiversity Information Center, Oregon State University and the Oregon State Implementation Committee, Sustainable Forestry Initiative. This update was made possible with help from the Northwest Habitat Institute, the Oregon Biodiversity Information Center, Institute for Natural Resources, Portland State University and Oregon State University. Acknowledgments: The Oregon Forest Resources Institute is grateful to the following contributors: Thomas O’Neil, Kathleen O’Neil, Malcolm Anderson and Jamie McFadden, Northwest Habitat Institute; the Integrated Habitat and Biodiversity Information System (IBIS), supported in part by the Northwest Power and Conservation Council and the Bonneville Power Administration under project #2003-072-00 and ESRI Conservation Program grants; Sue Vrilakas, Oregon Biodiversity Information Center, Institute for Natural Resources; and Dana Sanchez, Oregon State University, Mark Gourley, Starker Forests and Mike Rochelle, Weyerhaeuser Company. Edited by: Fran Cafferata Coe, Cafferata Consulting, LLC. Designed by: Sarah Craig, Word Jones © Copyright 2012 A Guide to Priority Plant and Animal Species in Oregon Forests Oregonians care about forest-dwelling wildlife and plants. This revised and updated publication is designed to assist forest landowners, land managers, students and educators in understanding how forests provide habitat for different wildlife and plant species. Keeping forestland in forestry is a great way to mitigate habitat loss resulting from development, mining and other non-forest uses. Through the use of specific forestry techniques, landowners can maintain, enhance and even create habitat for birds, mammals and amphibians while still managing lands for timber production.
    [Show full text]
  • Street Tree Inventory Report Hillsdale Neighborhood August 2016 Street Tree Inventory Report: Hillsdale Neighborhood August 2016
    Street Tree Inventory Report Hillsdale Neighborhood August 2016 Street Tree Inventory Report: Hillsdale Neighborhood August 2016 Written by: Kat Davidson, Angie DiSalvo, Julie Fukuda, Jim Gersbach, Jeremy Grotbo, and Jeff Ramsey Portland Parks & Recreation Urban Forestry 503-823-4484 [email protected] http://portlandoregon.gov/parks/treeinventory Hillsdale Tree Inventory Organizers: Jim Keiter Staff Neighborhood Coordinator: Jim Gersbach Data Collection Volunteers: Dennis Alexander, Richard Anderson, William Better, Ben Brady, Brian Brady, Julia Brown, Marty Crouch, Hannah Davidson, April Ann Fong, Lise Gervais, Margaret Gossage, Karen Henell, Jim Keiter, John Mills, Pat Ruffio, Jerry Sellers, Kristin Sellers, Mimi Siekmann, Haley Smith, Nancy Swaim, Mark Turner, Loris Van Pelt, Paige Witte, and Maggie Woodward Data Entry Volunteers: Michael Brehm, Nathan Riggsby, and Eric Watson Arborist-on-Call Volunteers: Will Koomjian GIS Technical Support: Josh Darling, Portland Parks & Recreation Financial Support: Portland Parks & Recreation Cover Photos (from top left to bottom right): 1) Colorful foliage on a golden Deodar cedar (Cedrus deodara 'Aurea'). 2) The deep green leaves of a quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides). 3) Unusual peeling bark on a young madrone (Arbutus menziesii). 4) A vivid fuchsia bloom on a magnolia (Magnolia sp.) 5) The developing cone of a rare China-fir Cunninghamia( lanceolata). 6) Unusually shaped leaves on a tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera). 7) The pendant foliage of a weeping giant sequoia (Sequoiadendron giganteum 'Pendulum'). 8) Multicolored scaly foliage on a variegated elkhorn cedar (Thujopsis dolobrata 'Variegata'). ver. 10/17/2016 Portland Parks & Recreation 1120 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 1302 Portland, Oregon 97204 (503) 823-PLAY Commissioner Amanda Fritz www.PortlandParks.org Director Mike Abbaté Contents Key Findings .........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Burning Characteristics of Big Leaf Maple, Red Alder, and Black Cottonwood Leaves
    Western Washington University Western CEDAR WWU Honors Program Senior Projects WWU Graduate and Undergraduate Scholarship Fall 2000 Burning Characteristics of Big Leaf Maple, Red Alder, and Black Cottonwood Leaves Elizabeth Ralston Follow this and additional works at: https://cedar.wwu.edu/wwu_honors Part of the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Ralston, Elizabeth, "Burning Characteristics of Big Leaf Maple, Red Alder, and Black Cottonwood Leaves" (2000). WWU Honors Program Senior Projects. 264. https://cedar.wwu.edu/wwu_honors/264 This Project is brought to you for free and open access by the WWU Graduate and Undergraduate Scholarship at Western CEDAR. It has been accepted for inclusion in WWU Honors Program Senior Projects by an authorized administrator of Western CEDAR. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY An equal opportunity university Honors Program Bellingham, Washington 98225-9089 (360)650-3034 Fax (360) 650-7305 HONORS THESIS In presenting this Honors paper in partial requirements fora bachelor’s degree at Western Washington University, I agree that the Library shall make its copies freely available for inspection. I further agree that extensive copying of this thesis is allowable only for scholarly purposes. It is understood that any publication of this thesis for commercial purposes or for financial gain shall not be allowed without mv written permission. Signatur Date12.^ 2/10(0 Burning characteristics of big leaf maple, red alder, and black cottonwood leaves Elizabeth Ralston Biology Department, Western Washington University, Bellingham, Washington Senior Honors Project December 12, 2000 Abstract The leaves from three Northwest deciduous trees were burned to compare flammability of nonwoody fuels.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Bigleaf Maple on Forest Floor and Mineral Soil
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Forest Ecology and Management 255 (2008) 1874–1882 www.elsevier.com/locate/foreco The influence of bigleaf maple on forest floor and mineral soil properties in a coniferous forest in coastal British Columbia Tanya D. Turk, Margaret G. Schmidt *, Nicholas J. Roberts Department of Geography, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6 Received 8 August 2007; received in revised form 7 December 2007; accepted 9 December 2007 Abstract Bigleaf maple (Acer macrophyllum Pursh) is a common tree species in coastal forests of the Pacific Northwest. We studied the influence of bigleaf maple on forest floor and mineral soil properties in a forest dominated by Douglas-fir [Pseudotsuga menziessi (Mirb.) Franco] and western hemlock [Tsuga heterophylla (Raf.) Sarg.]. Twelve plots containing bigleaf maple were compared to paired plots without the influence of bigleaf maple. Compared to conifer plots, forest floors at bigleaf maple plots were significantly thinner, but the total contents of C in both forest floor and surface mineral soils did not differ between bigleaf maple and conifer plots. This suggests that the bigleaf maple litter may not be fully decomposing; rather a portion of the decomposing litter may be transforming into recalcitrant soil organic matter. Bigleaf maple plots had significantly higher pH, NO3-N concentrations and contents and mineralizable N contents in the forest floor as well as significantly higher cation exchange capacity and concentrations of N (total, mineralizable and NO3-N) and exchangeable K, Ca and Mg in the mineral soil. The changes in soil chemical properties suggest that the presence of bigleaf maple in conifer forests may cause a modest improvement in soil fertility.
    [Show full text]
  • USGS Professional Paper 1794-A, Section 4
    Western Mountain Ranges Ecoregions Status and Trends of Land Change in the Western United States—1973 to 2000 Edited by Benjamin M. Sleeter, Tamara S. Wilson, and William Acevedo U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1794–A, 2012 Chapter 11 Cascades Ecoregion By Daniel G. Sorenson Ecoregion Description The ecoregion is bounded on the west by the Klamath Moun- tains, Willamette Valley, and Puget Lowland Ecoregions; on The Cascades Ecoregion (Omernik, 1987; U.S. Envi- the north by the North Cascades Ecoregion; and on the east by ronmental Protection Agency, 1997) covers approximately the Eastern Cascades Slopes and Foothills Ecoregion. 46,787 km² (18,064 mi2) in Washington, Oregon, and Califor- The Cascades Ecoregion is a forested, mountainous ecore- nia (fig. 1). The main body of the ecoregion extends from Sno- gion, and it contains a large amount of Cenozoic volcanic rock qualmie Pass, Washington, in the north, to Hayden Mountain, and many active and inactive volcanoes, especially in the east near State Highway 66 in southern Oregon. Also included in (McNab and Avers, 1994). Elevations range from near sea level the ecoregion is a small isolated section south of Bend, Ore- at the Columbia River to 4,390 m at Mount Rainier in Washing- gon, as well as a larger one around Mount Shasta, California. ton, with most of the ecoregion between 645 and 2,258 m. The 124° 122° PACIFIC PL NC OCEAN Figure 1. Map of Cascades Ecoregion and PL surrounding ecoregions, showing land-use/ land-cover classes from 1992 National Land CP Seattle 46° Cover Dataset (Vogelmann and others, 2001); Snoqualmie Pass note that not all land-use/land-cover classes CP shown in explanation may be depicted on Coast Range WASH INGTON map; note also that, for this “Status and Mount Rainier MOUNT RAINIER NP Trends of Land Change” study, transitional land-cover class was subdivided into Willamette Goat Rocks mechanically disturbed and nonmechanically Valley Mount St.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change and the Klamath-Siskiyou Region Annotated Bibliography
    Climate Change and the Klamath-Siskiyou Region Annotated Bibliography Table of Contents Bibliography (Alphabetical) 2 Bibliography (Organized by Topic) 6 Study Designs of Papers 10 Ecological Resilience 22 Connectivity 28 Klamath Siskiyou Region – General Ecological Information 31 Herbaceous Plants 50 Birds 60 Streams, Riparian Areas, & Salmon 62 Wildfire 72 Climate Refuge 97 Predicted Climate Change Impacts 107 Characteristics of Climate Vulnerability 116 Benefits of Healthy Ecosystems 117 Management – General Recommendations 119 Management – Fuels and Fire 141 Annotations on Individual Papers 148 1 Bibliography (Alphabetical) Anacker, Brian L. and Susan P. Harrison. 2012. Climate and the evolution of serpentine endism in California. Evol. Ecol. 26: 1011-1023. Anacker, B.L., Gogol-Prokurat, M., Leidholm, K. and S. Schoenig. 2013. Climate change vulnerability assessment of rare plants in California. Madrono 60(3): 193-210. Asarian, J. Eli and Jeffrey D. Walker. 2016. Long-term trends in streamflow and precipitation in northwest California and southwest Oregon, 1953-2012. Journal of the American Waters Association, 52 (1): 241-261. Ayram et al. 2016. Habitat connectivity in biodiversity conservation: A review of recent studies and applications. Progress in Physical Geography 40(1): 7-37. Batabyal, Amitrajeet A. 1998. On some aspects of ecological resilience and the conservation of species. Journal of Environmental Management 52: 373-378. Bottom et al. 2009. Reconnecting social and ecological resilience in salmon ecosystems. Ecology and Society 14(1): 5. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss1/art5/ Breining, Greg. 2016. What’s a National Park to do about climate change? Ensia Magazine. http://ensia.com/features/whats-a-national-park-to-do-about-climate-change/ Cahall, Rebecca E.
    [Show full text]
  • Soils of Temperate Rainforests of the North American Pacific Coast
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln U.S. Department of Agriculture: Agricultural Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty Research Service, Lincoln, Nebraska 2014 Soils of temperate rainforests of the North American Pacific Coast Dunbar N. Carpenter University of Wisconsin-Madison, [email protected] James G. Bockheim University of Wisconsin-Madison,, [email protected] Paul F. Reich USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, Beltsville, MD, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdaarsfacpub Part of the Forest Biology Commons, and the Other Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Carpenter, Dunbar N.; Bockheim, James G.; and Reich, Paul F., "Soils of temperate rainforests of the North American Pacific Coast" (2014). Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty. 1413. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdaarsfacpub/1413 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of Agriculture: Agricultural Research Service, Lincoln, Nebraska at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Geoderma 230–231 (2014) 250–264 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Geoderma journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/geoderma Soils of temperate rainforests of the North American PacificCoast Dunbar N. Carpenter a, James G. Bockheim b,⁎,PaulF.Reichc a Department of Forest
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomy and Phylogenetic Insights for Mexican and Central American Species of Acer (Sapindaceae)1
    Taxonomy and phylogenetic insights for Mexican and Central American species of Acer (Sapindaceae)1 Authors: Vargas-Rodriguez, Yalma L., Urbatsch, Lowell E., and Karaman-Castro, Vesna Source: The Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society, 147(1) : 49-86 Published By: Torrey Botanical Society URL: https://doi.org/10.3159/TORREY-D-19-00011.1 BioOne Complete (complete.BioOne.org) is a full-text database of 200 subscribed and open-access titles in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Complete website, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/terms-of-use. Usage of BioOne Complete content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non - commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Downloaded From: https://bioone.org/journals/The-Journal-of-the-Torrey-Botanical-Society on 17 Apr 2020 Terms of Use: https://bioone.org/terms-of-use Access provided by Universidad de Guadalajara Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 147(1): 49–86, 2020. Taxonomy and phylogenetic insights for Mexican and Central American species of Acer (Sapindaceae)1 Yalma L. Vargas-Rodriguez,2, 3 Lowell E. Urbatsch, and Vesna Karaman-Castro Department of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, 202 Life Sciences Building, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 Abstract.
    [Show full text]
  • Red Alder (Alnus Rubra Bong.)
    &]Forest An American Wood .S Service . Red United States Department of Agriculture Alder FS-215 Red alder is the most common hard­ wood in the Pacific Northwest and the largest of the American alders. It is a fast-growing, pioneer species and has nitrogen-fixing nodules on its roots. The wood is diffuse-porous, moderately light. and soft. It has excellent turning and polishing characteristics and takes glue, paint, and stain well. Major uses are for furniture, cabinets, and pallets, but substantial amounts are also used to make paper. F-320966 An American Wood Red Alder (Alnus mbra Bong.) Constance A. Harrington' Distribution The range of red alder extends from southern California Oatitude 340 N.) to southeastern Alaska (600 N.) (fig. 1). Red alder is not commonly found east of the Cascade or Sierra Nevada / Ranges, although there are several " isolated populations in northern Idaho. The species develops best at low eleva­ ; tions (below 1,500 ft) in northern / / Oregon, Washington, and British Co­ I lumbia. In the central part of its range, / scattered trees occur as high as 3,300 feet, but most stands are below 2,500 / I feet. o Red aIder grows in humid or superhumid climatic conditions. Throughout the tree's range, annual precipitation varies from 16 to 220 inches, with most faIling as rain during winter. Low winter temperatures and / lack of precipitation during the growing / season appear to be the main limits to So the range of the species. For good tree development, annual precipitation / ! should exceed 25 inches, or tree roots should have access to ground water.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Variation, Population Structure and Mating System in Bigleaf Maple {Acer Macrophyllum Pursh)
    GENETIC VARIATION, POPULATION STRUCTURE AND MATING SYSTEM IN BIGLEAF MAPLE {ACER MACROPHYLLUM PURSH) by MOHAMMED NURUDEEN IDDRISU Ing. For. University of Pinar del Rio, 1993. A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Forestry) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA May, 2005 © Mohammed Nurudeen Iddrisu, 2005 ABSTRACT Ecological characteristics and life history traits of long lived woody plants influence their levels of genetic variation. To embark upon sound management, utilization and conservation of plant species, a thorough understanding of genetic processes affecting their persistence is essential. In this thesis, I studied genetic diversity, population structure, and mating system as well as compared genetic diversity and inferred differences in genetic processes in continuous versus fragmented populations of bigleaf maple (Acer macrophyllum Pursh). Bigleaf maple is one of the most abundant hardwood species in the Pacific Northwest and its native range extends from latitude 33° N to 51° N along the Pacific coast of North America. Genetic diversity, estimated using isozyme markers, revealed a mean expected heterozygosity (HE) of 0.152 similar to other North American angiosperm trees. The level of population differentiation was moderately low (FST = 0.054), indicating extensive gene flow among populations. Estimated outcrossing rates in two populations were high (95%) but significantly less than one, with no biparental inbreeding evident. A relatively high level of correlated matings was found, consistent with 2-5 effective pollen donors per tree, indicating low adult density and limited pollinator dispersal. Seedling and adult populations possess similar levels of genetic variation regardless of whether populations are fragmented or continuous.
    [Show full text]