(A) Up-Regulated Genes in HCC827-GR-High2 Compared to Parental HCC827
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Screening and Identification of Key Biomarkers in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Based on Bioinformatics Analysis
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.21.423889; this version posted December 23, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Screening and identification of key biomarkers in clear cell renal cell carcinoma based on bioinformatics analysis Basavaraj Vastrad1, Chanabasayya Vastrad*2 , Iranna Kotturshetti 1. Department of Biochemistry, Basaveshwar College of Pharmacy, Gadag, Karnataka 582103, India. 2. Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Chanabasava Nilaya, Bharthinagar, Dharwad 580001, Karanataka, India. 3. Department of Ayurveda, Rajiv Gandhi Education Society`s Ayurvedic Medical College, Ron, Karnataka 562209, India. * Chanabasayya Vastrad [email protected] Ph: +919480073398 Chanabasava Nilaya, Bharthinagar, Dharwad 580001 , Karanataka, India bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.21.423889; this version posted December 23, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Abstract Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is one of the most common types of malignancy of the urinary system. The pathogenesis and effective diagnosis of ccRCC have become popular topics for research in the previous decade. In the current study, an integrated bioinformatics analysis was performed to identify core genes associated in ccRCC. An expression dataset (GSE105261) was downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database, and included 26 ccRCC and 9 normal kideny samples. Assessment of the microarray dataset led to the recognition of differentially expressed genes (DEGs), which was subsequently used for pathway and gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis. -
BLOC-1 and BLOC-3 Regulate VAMP7 Cycling to and From
BLOC-1 and BLOC-3 regulate VAMP7 cycling to and from melanosomes via distinct tubular transport carriers Megan K. Dennis1,2, Cédric Delevoye3,4, Amanda Acosta-Ruiz1,2, Ilse Hurbain3,4, Maryse Romao3,4, Geoffrey G. Hesketh5, Philip S. Goff6, Elena V. Sviderskaya6, Dorothy C. Bennett6, J. Paul Luzio5, Thierry Galli7, David J. Owen5, Graça Raposo3,4 and Michael S. Marks1,2,8 1Dept. of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Research Institute, and 2Dept. of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Dept of Physiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; 3Institut Curie, PSL Research University, CNRS, UMR144, Structure and Membrane Compartments, F-75005, Paris, France; 4 Institut Curie, PSL Research University, CNRS, UMR144, Cell and Tissue Imaging Facility (PICT-IBiSA), F-75005, Paris, France; 5Cambridge Institute for Medical Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; 6Cell Biology & Genetics Research Centre, St. George’s , University of London, London, UK; 7Sorbonne Paris-Cité, Univ. Paris-Diderot, Institut Jacques Monod, CNRS UMR7592, INSERM ERL U950, Membrane Traffic in Health & Disease, Paris, France. 8To whom correspondence should be addressed: Michael S. Marks, Ph.D. Dept. of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Research Institute 816G Abramson Research Center 3615 Civic Center Blvd. Philadelphia, PA 19104 Tel: 215-590-3664 Email: [email protected] Running title: VAMP7 into and out of melanosomes Keywords: SNARE, lysosome-related organelle, melanogenesis, Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome, recycling, endosome, 2 ABSTRACT Endomembrane organelle maturation requires cargo delivery via fusion with membrane transport intermediates and recycling of fusion factors to their sites of origin. -
Diagnosing Platelet Secretion Disorders: Examples Cases
Diagnosing platelet secretion disorders: examples cases Martina Daly Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield Disclosures for Martina Daly In compliance with COI policy, ISTH requires the following disclosures to the session audience: Research Support/P.I. No relevant conflicts of interest to declare Employee No relevant conflicts of interest to declare Consultant No relevant conflicts of interest to declare Major Stockholder No relevant conflicts of interest to declare Speakers Bureau No relevant conflicts of interest to declare Honoraria No relevant conflicts of interest to declare Scientific Advisory No relevant conflicts of interest to declare Board Platelet granule release Agonists (FIIa, Collagen, ADP) Signals Activation Shape change Membrane fusion Release of granule contents Platelet storage organelles lysosomes a granules Enzymes including cathepsins Adhesive proteins acid hydrolases Clotting factors and their inhibitors Fibrinolytic factors and their inhibitors Proteases and antiproteases Growth and mitogenic factors Chemokines, cytokines Anti-microbial proteins Membrane glycoproteins dense (d) granules ADP/ATP Serotonin histamine inorganic polyphosphate Platelet a-granule contents Type Prominent components Membrane glycoproteins GPIb, aIIbb3, GPVI Clotting factors VWF, FV, FXI, FII, Fibrinogen, HMWK, FXIII? Clotting inhibitors TFPI, protein S, protease nexin-2 Fibrinolysis components PAI-1, TAFI, a2-antiplasmin, plasminogen, uPA Other protease inhibitors a1-antitrypsin, a2-macroglobulin -
Primepcr™Assay Validation Report
PrimePCR™Assay Validation Report Gene Information Gene Name olfactory receptor, family 5, subfamily J, member 2 Gene Symbol OR5J2 Organism Human Gene Summary Olfactory receptors interact with odorant molecules in the nose to initiate a neuronal response that triggers the perception of a smell. The olfactory receptor proteins are members of a large family of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) arising from single coding-exon genes. Olfactory receptors share a 7-transmembrane domain structure with many neurotransmitter and hormone receptors and are responsible for the recognition and G protein-mediated transduction of odorant signals. The olfactory receptor gene family is the largest in the genome. The nomenclature assigned to the olfactory receptor genes and proteins for this organism is independent of other organisms. Gene Aliases OR11-266 RefSeq Accession No. NC_000011.9, NT_167190.1 UniGene ID Hs.537145 Ensembl Gene ID ENSG00000174957 Entrez Gene ID 282775 Assay Information Unique Assay ID qHsaCED0019003 Assay Type SYBR® Green Detected Coding Transcript(s) ENST00000312298 Amplicon Context Sequence CCTTGTTGAGGAATCTGGGCATGATCCTCTTAATCCAAATCACCTCCAAACTCCA CACACCCATGTACTTTTTACTCAGCTGTCTTTCATTTGTGGATGCCTGCTATTCAT CTGCAATT Amplicon Length (bp) 89 Chromosome Location 11:55944206-55944324 Assay Design Exonic Purification Desalted Validation Results Efficiency (%) 104 R2 0.9987 cDNA Cq 29.8 Page 1/5 PrimePCR™Assay Validation Report cDNA Tm (Celsius) 79.5 gDNA Cq 23.17 Specificity (%) 100 Information to assist with data interpretation is provided -
A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of Β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus
Page 1 of 781 Diabetes A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus Robert N. Bone1,6,7, Olufunmilola Oyebamiji2, Sayali Talware2, Sharmila Selvaraj2, Preethi Krishnan3,6, Farooq Syed1,6,7, Huanmei Wu2, Carmella Evans-Molina 1,3,4,5,6,7,8* Departments of 1Pediatrics, 3Medicine, 4Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, 5Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, the 6Center for Diabetes & Metabolic Diseases, and the 7Herman B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202; 2Department of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, 46202; 8Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202. *Corresponding Author(s): Carmella Evans-Molina, MD, PhD ([email protected]) Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Drive, MS 2031A, Indianapolis, IN 46202, Telephone: (317) 274-4145, Fax (317) 274-4107 Running Title: Golgi Stress Response in Diabetes Word Count: 4358 Number of Figures: 6 Keywords: Golgi apparatus stress, Islets, β cell, Type 1 diabetes, Type 2 diabetes 1 Diabetes Publish Ahead of Print, published online August 20, 2020 Diabetes Page 2 of 781 ABSTRACT The Golgi apparatus (GA) is an important site of insulin processing and granule maturation, but whether GA organelle dysfunction and GA stress are present in the diabetic β-cell has not been tested. We utilized an informatics-based approach to develop a transcriptional signature of β-cell GA stress using existing RNA sequencing and microarray datasets generated using human islets from donors with diabetes and islets where type 1(T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) had been modeled ex vivo. To narrow our results to GA-specific genes, we applied a filter set of 1,030 genes accepted as GA associated. -
A Network of Bhlhzip Transcription Factors in Melanoma: Interactions of MITF, TFEB and TFE3
A network of bHLHZip transcription factors in melanoma: Interactions of MITF, TFEB and TFE3 Josué A. Ballesteros Álvarez Thesis for the degree of Philosophiae Doctor January 2019 Net bHLHZip umritunarþátta í sortuæxlum: Samstarf milli MITF, TFEB og TFE3 Josué A. Ballesteros Álvarez Ritgerð til doktorsgráðu Leiðbeinandi/leiðbeinendur: Eiríkur Steingrímsson Doktorsnefnd: Margrét H. Ögmundsdóttir Þórarinn Guðjónsson Jórunn E. Eyfjörð Lars Rönnstrand Janúar 2019 Thesis for a doctoral degree at tHe University of Iceland. All rigHts reserved. No Part of tHis Publication may be reProduced in any form witHout tHe Prior permission of the copyright holder. © Josue A. Ballesteros Álvarez. 2019 ISBN 978-9935-9421-4-2 Printing by HáskólaPrent Reykjavik, Iceland 2019 Ágrip StjórnPróteinin MITF , TFEB, TFE3 og TFEC (stundum nefnd MiT-TFE þættirnir) tilheyra bHLHZip fjölskyldu umritunarþátta sem bindast DNA og stjórna tjáningu gena. MITF er mikilvægt fyrir myndun og starfsemi litfruma en ættingjar þess, TFEB og TFE3, stjórna myndun og starfsemi lysósóma og sjálfsáti. Sjálfsát er líffræðilegt ferli sem gegnir mikilvægu hlutverki í starfsemi fruma en getur einnig haft áHrif á myndun og meðHöndlun sjúkdóma. Í verkefni þessu var samstarf MITF, TFE3 og TFEB Próteinanna skoðað í sortuæxlisfrumum og hvaða áhrif þau Hafa á tjáningu hvers annars. Eins og MITF eru TFEB og TFE3 genin tjáð í sortuæxlisfrumum og sortuæxlum; TFEC er ekki tjáð í þessum frumum og var því ekki skoðað í þessu verkefni. Með notkun sérvirkra hindra var sýnt að boðleiðir hafa áhrif á staðsetningu próteinanna þriggja í sortuæxlisfrumum. Umritunarþættir þessir geta bundist skyldum DNA-bindisetum og haft áhrif á tjáningu gena sem eru nauðsynleg fyrir myndun bæði lýsósóma og melanósóma. -
Supplementary Tables
Supplementary Tables Supplementary Table S1: Preselected miRNAs used in feature selection Univariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis of the endpoint freedom from recurrence in the training set (DKTK-ROG sample) allowed the pre-selection of 524 miRNAs (P< 0.5), which were used in the feature selection. P-value was derived from log-rank test. miRNA p-value miRNA p-value miRNA p-value miRNA p-value hsa-let-7g-3p 0.0001520 hsa-miR-1304-3p 0.0490161 hsa-miR-7108-5p 0.1263245 hsa-miR-6865-5p 0.2073121 hsa-miR-6825-3p 0.0004257 hsa-miR-4298 0.0506194 hsa-miR-4453 0.1270967 hsa-miR-6893-5p 0.2120664 hsa-miR-668-3p 0.0005188 hsa-miR-484 0.0518625 hsa-miR-200a-5p 0.1276345 hsa-miR-25-3p 0.2123829 hsa-miR-3622b-3p 0.0005885 hsa-miR-6851-3p 0.0531446 hsa-miR-6090 0.1278692 hsa-miR-3189-5p 0.2136060 hsa-miR-6885-3p 0.0006452 hsa-miR-1276 0.0557418 hsa-miR-148b-3p 0.1279811 hsa-miR-6073 0.2139702 hsa-miR-6875-3p 0.0008188 hsa-miR-3173-3p 0.0559962 hsa-miR-4425 0.1288330 hsa-miR-765 0.2141536 hsa-miR-487b-5p 0.0011381 hsa-miR-650 0.0564616 hsa-miR-6798-3p 0.1293342 hsa-miR-338-5p 0.2153079 hsa-miR-210-5p 0.0012316 hsa-miR-6133 0.0571407 hsa-miR-4472 0.1300006 hsa-miR-6806-5p 0.2173515 hsa-miR-1470 0.0012822 hsa-miR-4701-5p 0.0571720 hsa-miR-4465 0.1304841 hsa-miR-98-5p 0.2184947 hsa-miR-6890-3p 0.0016539 hsa-miR-202-3p 0.0575741 hsa-miR-514b-5p 0.1308790 hsa-miR-500a-3p 0.2185577 hsa-miR-6511b-3p 0.0017165 hsa-miR-4733-5p 0.0616138 hsa-miR-378c 0.1317442 hsa-miR-4515 0.2187539 hsa-miR-7109-3p 0.0021381 hsa-miR-595 0.0629350 hsa-miR-3121-3p -
DULIP: a Dual Luminescence-Based Co-Immunoprecipitation Assay for Interactome Mapping in Mammalian Cells
Repository of the Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine (MDC) in the Helmholtz Association http://edoc.mdc-berlin.de/14998 DULIP: A dual luminescence-based co-immunoprecipitation assay for interactome mapping in mammalian cells Trepte, P., Buntru, A., Klockmeier, K., Willmore, L., Arumughan, A., Secker, C., Zenkner, M., Brusendorf, L., Rau, K., Redel, A., Wanker, E.E. NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in the Journal of Molecular Biology. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in: Journal of Molecular Biology 2015 MMM DD ; 427(21): 3375-3388 doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.08.003 Publisher: Elsevier © 2015, Elsevier. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, PO Box 1866, Mountain View, CA 94042, USA. DULIP: A DUAL LUMINESCENCE-BASED CO-IMMUNOPRECIPITATION ASSAY FOR INTERACTOME MAPPING IN MAMMALIAN CELLS Philipp Treptea, Alexander Buntrua#, Konrad Klockmeiera#, Lindsay Willmorea, Anup Arumughana, Christopher Seckera, Martina Zenknera, Lydia Brusendorfa, Kirstin Raua, Alexandra Redela and Erich E Wankera* a Neuroproteomics, Max Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine, Robert-Roessle- Straße 10, 13125 Berlin, Germany # Contributed equally * Corresponding author, E-mail address: [email protected], Telephone: +49- 30-9406-2157, Fax: +49-30-9406-2552 ABSTRACT Mapping of protein-protein interactions (PPIs) is critical for understanding protein function and complex biological processes. -
Supplementary Figure S4
18DCIS 18IDC Supplementary FigureS4 22DCIS 22IDC C D B A E (0.77) (0.78) 16DCIS 14DCIS 28DCIS 16IDC 28IDC (0.43) (0.49) 0 ADAMTS12 (p.E1469K) 14IDC ERBB2, LASP1,CDK12( CCNE1 ( NUTM2B SDHC,FCGR2B,PBX1,TPR( CD1D, B4GALT3, BCL9, FLG,NUP21OL,TPM3,TDRD10,RIT1,LMNA,PRCC,NTRK1 0 ADAMTS16 (p.E67K) (0.67) (0.89) (0.54) 0 ARHGEF38 (p.P179Hfs*29) 0 ATG9B (p.P823S) (0.68) (1.0) ARID5B, CCDC6 CCNE1, TSHZ3,CEP89 CREB3L2,TRIM24 BRAF, EGFR (7p11); 0 ABRACL (p.R35H) 0 CATSPER1 (p.P152H) 0 ADAMTS18 (p.Y799C) 19q12 0 CCDC88C (p.X1371_splice) (0) 0 ADRA1A (p.P327L) (10q22.3) 0 CCNF (p.D637N) −4 −2 −4 −2 0 AKAP4 (p.G454A) 0 CDYL (p.Y353Lfs*5) −4 −2 Log2 Ratio Log2 Ratio −4 −2 Log2 Ratio Log2 Ratio 0 2 4 0 2 4 0 ARID2 (p.R1068H) 0 COL27A1 (p.G646E) 0 2 4 0 2 4 2 EDRF1 (p.E521K) 0 ARPP21 (p.P791L) ) 0 DDX11 (p.E78K) 2 GPR101, p.A174V 0 ARPP21 (p.P791T) 0 DMGDH (p.W606C) 5 ANP32B, p.G237S 16IDC (Ploidy:2.01) 16DCIS (Ploidy:2.02) 14IDC (Ploidy:2.01) 14DCIS (Ploidy:2.9) -3 -2 -1 -3 -2 -1 -3 -2 -1 -3 -2 -1 -3 -2 -1 -3 -2 -1 Log Ratio Log Ratio Log Ratio Log Ratio 12DCIS 0 ASPM (p.S222T) Log Ratio Log Ratio 0 FMN2 (p.G941A) 20 1 2 3 2 0 1 2 3 2 ERBB3 (p.D297Y) 2 0 1 2 3 20 1 2 3 0 ATRX (p.L1276I) 20 1 2 3 2 0 1 2 3 0 GALNT18 (p.F92L) 2 MAPK4, p.H147Y 0 GALNTL6 (p.E236K) 5 C11orf1, p.Y53C (10q21.2); 0 ATRX (p.R1401W) PIK3CA, p.H1047R 28IDC (Ploidy:2.0) 28DCIS (Ploidy:2.0) 22IDC (Ploidy:3.7) 22DCIS (Ploidy:4.1) 18IDC (Ploidy:3.9) 18DCIS (Ploidy:2.3) 17q12 0 HCFC1 (p.S2025C) 2 LCMT1 (p.S34A) 0 ATXN7L2 (p.X453_splice) SPEN, p.P677Lfs*13 CBFB 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 -
Aberrant Sialylation in Cancer: Biomarker and Potential Target for Therapeutic Intervention?
cancers Review Aberrant Sialylation in Cancer: Biomarker and Potential Target for Therapeutic Intervention? Silvia Pietrobono * and Barbara Stecca * Tumor Cell Biology Unit, Core Research Laboratory, Institute for Cancer Research and Prevention (ISPRO), Viale Pieraccini 6, 50139 Florence, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected] (S.P.); [email protected] (B.S.); Tel.: +39-055-7944568 (S.P.); +39-055-7944567 (B.S.) Simple Summary: Sialylation is a post-translational modification that consists in the addition of sialic acid to growing glycan chains on glycoproteins and glycolipids. Aberrant sialylation is an established hallmark of several types of cancer, including breast, ovarian, pancreatic, prostate, colorectal and lung cancers, melanoma and hepatocellular carcinoma. Hypersialylation can be the effect of increased activity of sialyltransferases and results in an excess of negatively charged sialic acid on the surface of cancer cells. Sialic acid accumulation contributes to tumor progression by several paths, including stimulation of tumor invasion and migration, and enhancing immune evasion and tumor cell survival. In this review we explore the mechanisms by which sialyltransferases promote cancer progression. In addition, we provide insights into the possible use of sialyltransferases as biomarkers for cancer and summarize findings on the development of sialyltransferase inhibitors as potential anti-cancer treatments. Abstract: Sialylation is an integral part of cellular function, governing many biological processes Citation: Pietrobono, S.; Stecca, B. including cellular recognition, adhesion, molecular trafficking, signal transduction and endocytosis. Aberrant Sialylation in Cancer: Sialylation is controlled by the levels and the activities of sialyltransferases on glycoproteins and Biomarker and Potential Target for lipids. Altered gene expression of these enzymes in cancer yields to cancer-specific alterations of Therapeutic Intervention? Cancers glycoprotein sialylation. -
LETTER Doi:10.1038/Nature09515
LETTER doi:10.1038/nature09515 Distant metastasis occurs late during the genetic evolution of pancreatic cancer Shinichi Yachida1*, Siaˆn Jones2*, Ivana Bozic3, Tibor Antal3,4, Rebecca Leary2, Baojin Fu1, Mihoko Kamiyama1, Ralph H. Hruban1,5, James R. Eshleman1, Martin A. Nowak3, Victor E. Velculescu2, Kenneth W. Kinzler2, Bert Vogelstein2 & Christine A. Iacobuzio-Donahue1,5,6 Metastasis, the dissemination and growth of neoplastic cells in an were present in the primary pancreatic tumours from which the meta- organ distinct from that in which they originated1,2, is the most stases arose. A small number of these samples of interest were cell lines common cause of death in cancer patients. This is particularly true or xenografts, similar to the index lesions, whereas the majority were for pancreatic cancers, where most patients are diagnosed with fresh-frozen tissues that contained admixed neoplastic, stromal, metastatic disease and few show a sustained response to chemo- inflammatory, endothelial and normal epithelial cells (Fig. 1a). Each therapy or radiation therapy3. Whether the dismal prognosis of tissue sample was therefore microdissected to minimize contaminat- patients with pancreatic cancer compared to patients with other ing non-neoplastic elements before purifying DNA. types of cancer is a result of late diagnosis or early dissemination of Two categories of mutations were identified (Fig. 1b). The first and disease to distant organs is not known. Here we rely on data gen- largest category corresponded to those mutations present in all samples erated by sequencing the genomes of seven pancreatic cancer meta- from a given patient (‘founder’ mutations, mean of 64%, range 48–83% stases to evaluate the clonal relationships among primary and of all mutations per patient; Fig. -
Supplementary Materials
Supplementary materials Supplementary Table S1: MGNC compound library Ingredien Molecule Caco- Mol ID MW AlogP OB (%) BBB DL FASA- HL t Name Name 2 shengdi MOL012254 campesterol 400.8 7.63 37.58 1.34 0.98 0.7 0.21 20.2 shengdi MOL000519 coniferin 314.4 3.16 31.11 0.42 -0.2 0.3 0.27 74.6 beta- shengdi MOL000359 414.8 8.08 36.91 1.32 0.99 0.8 0.23 20.2 sitosterol pachymic shengdi MOL000289 528.9 6.54 33.63 0.1 -0.6 0.8 0 9.27 acid Poricoic acid shengdi MOL000291 484.7 5.64 30.52 -0.08 -0.9 0.8 0 8.67 B Chrysanthem shengdi MOL004492 585 8.24 38.72 0.51 -1 0.6 0.3 17.5 axanthin 20- shengdi MOL011455 Hexadecano 418.6 1.91 32.7 -0.24 -0.4 0.7 0.29 104 ylingenol huanglian MOL001454 berberine 336.4 3.45 36.86 1.24 0.57 0.8 0.19 6.57 huanglian MOL013352 Obacunone 454.6 2.68 43.29 0.01 -0.4 0.8 0.31 -13 huanglian MOL002894 berberrubine 322.4 3.2 35.74 1.07 0.17 0.7 0.24 6.46 huanglian MOL002897 epiberberine 336.4 3.45 43.09 1.17 0.4 0.8 0.19 6.1 huanglian MOL002903 (R)-Canadine 339.4 3.4 55.37 1.04 0.57 0.8 0.2 6.41 huanglian MOL002904 Berlambine 351.4 2.49 36.68 0.97 0.17 0.8 0.28 7.33 Corchorosid huanglian MOL002907 404.6 1.34 105 -0.91 -1.3 0.8 0.29 6.68 e A_qt Magnogrand huanglian MOL000622 266.4 1.18 63.71 0.02 -0.2 0.2 0.3 3.17 iolide huanglian MOL000762 Palmidin A 510.5 4.52 35.36 -0.38 -1.5 0.7 0.39 33.2 huanglian MOL000785 palmatine 352.4 3.65 64.6 1.33 0.37 0.7 0.13 2.25 huanglian MOL000098 quercetin 302.3 1.5 46.43 0.05 -0.8 0.3 0.38 14.4 huanglian MOL001458 coptisine 320.3 3.25 30.67 1.21 0.32 0.9 0.26 9.33 huanglian MOL002668 Worenine