Annexure – List of Raw Materials (Agreement)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Annexure – List of Raw Materials (Agreement) Annexure – List of Raw Materials (Agreement) Company will make agreement with supplier of raw material after getting EC & CTE. Some raw material will import and some will be local. Sr. Product Name Raw Material Consumption CAS NOS. LD 50 No. (MT/MT of product) (mg/kg) Existing Additional Total 1. 2-4-D Ethyl Ester 2,4-D acid 0.95 0 0.95 94-75-7 699 Ethyl alcohol 0.21 0 0.21 64-17-5 140 2. 2-4-D Sodium Salt 2,4 –Dichloro phenol 0.725 0 0.725 120-83-2 47 Mono Chloro Acetic Acid 0.520 0 0.520 79-11-8 165 3. Abamectin Streptomycessavermitis 0. 550 0 0. 550 NA NA Anthelminic 1.100 0 1.100 NA NA Acaricidal 1.100 0 1.100 NA NA 4. Acetamiprid N-Cyano methyl Acetamidate 0. 500 0 0. 500 5652 -84 -6 NA 2-Chloro 5-(methyl amino methyl) Pyridine 0.730 0 0.730 18368-64-4 NA Methanol 0.200 0 0.200 67-56-1 5628 5. Allethrin Cyclohexane 0. 930 0 0. 930 110 -82 -7 39 Allethrolone 0. 540 0 0. 540 29605 -88 -7 NA Pyridine 0.350 0 0.350 110-86-1 891 Chrysanthemic acid chloride 0.640 0 0.640 4638-92-0 NA 6. Alpha Cypermethrin Meta phenoxy benzaldehyde 0.714 0 0.714 39515-51-0 1222 Sodium cyanide 0.195 0 0.195 143-33-9 6.440 n- Hexane 4.300 0 4.300 110 -54 -3 5000 Cyprmethric acid chloride 0.835 0 0.835 52314-67-7 NA 7. Attrazine Toluene 0.050 0 0.050 108-88-3 2600 Cynauric Chloride 0. 905 0 0. 905 108 -77 -0 86 Isopropyl amine 0. 420 0 0. 420 75 -31 -0 550 Mono ethyl amine 0.321 0 0.321 75-04-7 530 Soda ash 0.266 0 0.266 497-19-8 5000 8. Azoxystrobin Des - methoxyazoxy 1.734 0 1.734 NA NA Dichloro methane 0.750 0 0.750 75-09-2 1250 Titanium tetra chloride 1.365 0 1.365 7550-45-0 NA Methyl formate 0.432 0 0.432 107-31-3 1622 Triethyl amine 1.493 0 1.493 121 -44 -8 546 Hydrochloric acid 1.440 0 1.440 7647-01-0 1449 Methanol 0.900 0 0.900 67-56-1 5628 9. Buprofezin p-nitrophenyl -N-chloromethyl carbamate 1.426 0 1.426 NA NA Toluene 0.425 0 0.425 108-88-3 2600 Thiourea 0.854 0 0.854 62-56-6 125 Lime 0.282 0 0.282 1305-62-0 7300 Ethylene dichloride 0.610 0 0.610 107-06-2 870 10. Butachlore 2,6-Diethyl aniline 0.500 0 0.500 579-66-8 1800 Benzene 0. 265 0 0. 265 71 -43 -2 3306 Paraformaldehyde 0.170 0 0.170 30525-89-4 800 Triethyl amine 0.0035 0 0.0035 121-44-8 460 Chloroacetyle chloride 0.395 0 0.395 79-04-9 208 N-Butanol 1.050 0 1.050 71 -36 -3 790 11. Cartap hydrochloride 2-Dimethylamino-1, 3- dichloropropane 0.680 0 0.680 NA NA Sodium thiosulphate 0.120 0 0.120 7772-98-7 5200 Sodium cyanide 0.0 80 0 0.0 80 143 -33 -9 6.44 Hydrochloric acid 0. 150 0 0. 150 7647 -01 -0 900 12. Chlorpyrifos Sodium Salt of trichloroPyridinol 0.658 0 0.658 37439-34-2 7500 Diethyl Thio Phosphoryl Chloride 0.560 0 0.560 2524-04-1 1340 Ethylene dichloride 0. 263 0 0. 263 107 -06 -2 870 13. Cyfluthrin FluroMeta Phenoxy Benzaldehyde 0.495 0 0.495 68359-57-9 650 Sodium cyanide 0.140 0 0.140 143-33-9 6.44 Cypermethric Acid chloride 0. 578 0 0. 578 52314 -67 -7 NA Hexane 0.050 0 0.050 110-54-3 5000 14. Cypermethrin Cypermethric Acid chloride 0.590 0 0.590 52314-67-7 NA Meta Phenoxy Benzaldehyde 0.485 0 0.485 39515-51-0 1222 Sodium cyanide 0.145 0 0.145 143-33-9 6.44 Phase Transfer Catalyst 0.006 0 0.006 NA NA Hexane 0.0 45 0 0.0 45 110 -54 -3 5000 Hypochlorite 1.630 0 1.630 14380-61-1 7500 15. DDVP 0 Chloral 0.705 0 0.705 75-87-6 480 Trimethylphosphite 0. 564 0 0. 564 121 -45 -9 2500 16. Delta cypermethrin Ester of Bi-cisthemic acid 0.515 0 0.515 NA NA Thionyl Chloride 0.150 0 0.150 7719-09-7 324 Meta phenoxybenzaldehyde 0. 485 0 0. 485 39515 -51 -0 1222 Sodium cyanide 0. 150 0 0. 150 143 -33 -9 6.44 17. Difenconazole 4-methyl-1, 3-dioxolane 0.281 0 0.281 1072-47-5 NA 2-chloro-4-(4-chlorophenoxy) benzyl chloride 0.927 0 0.927 NA NA Dimethyl Formamide 0. 174 0 0. 174 68 -12 -2 3000 1,2,4-Trizole 0.236 0 0.236 288-88-0 1350 Potassium hydroxide 0.562 0 0.562 1310-58-3 273 18. D-Transallethrin Cyclohexane 0. 260 0 0. 260 110 -82 -7 813 Allethrelone 0.540 0 0.540 29605-88-7 NA Pyridine 0.015 0 0.015 110-86-1 1580 Chrysanthemic acid chloride 0.637 0 0.637 14297-81-5 NA 19. Emmamectin Streptomycessavermitis 0.455 0 0.455 NA NA Anthelminic 0.910 0 0.910 NA NA Acaricidal 0. 910 0 0. 910 NA NA Methyl benzoate 0.225 0 0.225 93-58-3 1177 Methanol 0.310 0 0.310 67-56-1 5628 20. Fipronil Fipronil Pyrazole 1.263 0 1.263 120068 -37 -3 NA Ammonium Thiocyanate 0. 809 0 0. 809 1762 -95 -4 500 Oxone 3.906 0 3.906 10058-23-8 2000 Triflouro methyl bromide 0.835 0 0.835 32247-96-4 NA Triflouro acetic acid 1.232 0 1.232 76 -05 -1 NA 21. Glyphosate N-phospho Methyl Imino Di Acetic Acid 2.000 0 2.000 NA NA Hydrogen Peroxide 0.750 0 0.750 7722-84-1 2000 Ferrous sulphate 0.300 0 0.300 7720-78-7 1520 22. Hexaconazole 2,4-Dichloro valero phenol 0.800 0 0.800 NA NA Dimethyl sulphide 1.160 0 1.160 75-18-3 3300 Potassium hydroxide 0.693 0 0.693 1310-58-3 273 Oxarine 0. 733 0 0. 733 NA NA Dimethyl formamide 0.080 0 0.080 68-12-2 2800 1,2,4-triazole 0.253 0 0.253 288-88-0 3000 23. Imazethapyr 5-ethyl-3-pyridine carboxylic acid 0.818 0 0.818 NA NA ,5 Dihydro -4 methyl 4 (1 methyl ethyl) -5-oxo -1 0.682 0 0.682 NA NA H-imidazoline Dimethyl formamide 0.145 0 0.145 68-12-2 2800 Sodium carbonate 0.636 0 0.636 497-19-8 5000 24. Imidacloprid 2–Chloro, 5 –chloro methyl Pyridine 0. 855 0 0. 855 70258 -18 -3 NA N – Nitro iminoIdmidazolidine 0.715 0 0.715 NA NA Dimethyl formamide 0.108 0 0.108 68-12-2 2800 Sodium carbonate 0.671 0 0.671 497-19-8 5000 Methanol 0.0 20 0 0.0 20 67 -56 -1 5628 25. Indozacarb Monoglyme 0.015 0 0.015 110-71-4 NA Sodium hydride 0.160 0 0.160 7646-69-7 NA Chloromethylformate 0. 378 0 0. 378 NA NA Oxadiazine carboxylate 0. 626 0 0. 626 NA NA Dichloromethane 0.060 0 0.060 70110-03-1 NA 26. Ipconazole Cyclopentanol 0.357 0 0.357 96-41-3 1250 Dimethyl Sulphide 1.243 0 1.243 75 -18 -3 3300 4-Chloro Benzyl Chloride 0.715 0 0.715 104-83-6 NA Potassium hydroxide 0.715 0 0.715 1310-58-3 363 Dimethyl formamide 0.100 0 0.100 68-12-2 2800 1,2,4 -Trizole 0. 300 0 0. 300 288 -88 -0 3000 Para formaldehyde 0.157 0 0.157 30255-89-4 800 27. Lambda Cyhalothrin Meta Phenoxy Benzaldehyde 0.470 0 0.470 39515-51-0 1222 Sodium Cyanide 0.128 0 0.128 143-33-9 6.44 TFP Acid Chloride 0. 640 0 0. 640 72748 -35 -7 NA N-Hexane 0.120 0 0.120 110-54-3 500 Isopropyl alcohol 0.300 0 0.300 67-63-0 5500 28. Met sulfuron methyl O-sulfoisocyante Methyl Benzoate 0. 634 0 0. 634 NA NA 2-Amino 4 -Methoxy 6 -Methyl 1,3,5 Triazine 0. 367 0 0. 367 1668 -54 -8 NA Toluene 0.100 0 0.100 108-88-3 2600 29. Metalexyl N-(2, 6 – Dimethyl Phenyl) Alanine – Methyl 0. 750 0 0. 750 623950 -05 -0 NA Ester Methoxy Acetyl Chloride 0.400 0 0.400 38870-89-2 NA Toluene 0. 110 0 0. 110 108 -88 -3 2600 30. Novaluron 2,6-difluoro benzoyl isocyanate 0.321 0 0.321 60731-73-9 NA 2-chloro-4-amino phenoxy ether 0.794 0 0.794 NA NA Toluene 0.546 0 0.546 108-88-3 2600 31. Oxyfluorfen 2-Chloro Trichloro p -Tolyl 3 -Ethoxy phenyl 0.877 0 0.877 NA NA Ether Nitric Acid 0. 252 0 0. 252 7697 -37 -2 2345 32. Pacloburazol tert-pentan-3-ol 0.380 0 0.380 154222-11-4 710 4-Chloro Benzyl Chloride 0.690 0 0.690 104-83-6 1287 KOH 0.690 0 0.690 1310-58-3 273 DMF 0.075 0 0.075 68-12-2 3000 1,2,4 Triazol 0.
Recommended publications
  • Cypermethrin
    International Environmental Health Criteria 82 Cypermethrin Published under the joint sponsorship of the United Nations Environment Programme, the International Labour Organisation, and the World Health Organization WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION GENEVA 1989 Other titles available in the ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CRITERIA series include: 1. Mercury 2. Polychlorinated Biphenyls and Terphenyls 3. Lead 4. Oxides of Nitrogen 5. Nitrates, Nitrites, and N-Nitroso Compounds 6. Principles and Methods for Evaluating the Toxicity of Chemicals, Part 1 7. Photochemical Oxidants 8. Sulfur Oxides and Suspended Particulate Matter 9. DDT and its Derivatives 10. Carbon Disulfide 11. Mycotoxins 12. Noise 13. Carbon Monoxide 14. Ultraviolet Radiation 15. Tin and Organotin Compounds 16. Radiofrequency and Microwaves 17. Manganese 18. Arsenic 19. Hydrogen Sulfide 20. Selected Petroleum Products 21. Chlorine and Hydrogen Chloride 22. Ultrasound 23. Lasers and Optical Radiation 24. Titanium 25. Selected Radionuclides 26. Styrene 27. Guidelines on Studies in Environmental Epidemiology 28. Acrylonitrile 29. 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid (2,4-D) 30. Principles for Evaluating Health Risks to Progeny Associated with Exposure to Chemicals during Pregnancy 31. Tetrachloroethylene 32. Methylene Chloride 33. Epichlorohydrin 34. Chlordane 35. Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) Fields 36. Fluorine and Fluorides 37. Aquatic (Marine and Freshwater) Biotoxins 38. Heptachlor 39. Paraquat and Diquat 40. Endosulfan 41. Quintozene 42. Tecnazene 43. Chlordecone 44. Mirex continued on p. 156
    [Show full text]
  • Insecticide Residue Analyses in Cucumbers Sampled from Çanakkale Open Markets1 Çanakkale Açık Pazarlarından Örneklenen Hıyarlarda Insektisit Kalıntı Analizleri
    Türk. entomol. derg., 2020, 44 (4): 449-460 ISSN 1010-6960 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.16970/entoted.767482 E-ISSN 2536-491X Original article (Orijinal araştırma) Insecticide residue analyses in cucumbers sampled from Çanakkale open markets1 Çanakkale açık pazarlarından örneklenen hıyarlarda insektisit kalıntı analizleri Hayriye ÇATAK2 Osman TİRYAKİ3* Abstract The aim of this study was to investigate four insecticide residues in cucumbers with the aid of QuEChERS 2007.1 method. For method verification assessment, pesticide-free cucumber matrix was spiked with 0.1, 1 and 10 times of MRL for each pesticide. The QuEChERS-LC-MS/MS analytical method revealed that the detection limits of the insecticides were below the MRLs and the overall recovery of method was 97.7%. These figures were within the SANTE recovery limits (60-140%) and the values specified for the repeatability (≤20%). Cucumbers were collected from six different stands (A-F) at Çanakkale open markets for 6 weeks between 23 November and 28 December 2018. Residues of each sampling time and each stand were assessed. Acetamiprid residue of 257g and 236 µg/kg were detected in week 5 from stand B and in week 2 from stand E, respectively. These values are close to MRL (300 µg/kg). Formetanate hydrochloride residue of the week 3 from stand F (36.3 µg/kg) was more than MRL of 10 µg/kg. Pirimiphos methyl and chlorpyrifos residues were not detected in cucumbers. Theoretical maximum daily intake assessment showed that there was no chronic exposure risk for these four pesticides through cucumber consumption. Keywords: Cucumber, insecticide residues, QuEChERS, risk assessment, toxicology Öz Bu çalışma hıyarlarda dört insektisit kalıntısını QuEChERS 2007.1 yöntemi ile belirlemek amacıyla yapılmıştır.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring of Pesticide Residues in Commonly Used Fruits and Vegetables in Kuwait
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Article Monitoring of Pesticide Residues in Commonly Used Fruits and Vegetables in Kuwait Mustapha F. A. Jallow *, Dawood G. Awadh, Mohammed S. Albaho, Vimala Y. Devi and Nisar Ahmad Environment and Life Sciences Research Center, Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research, P.O. Box 24885, Safat 13109, Kuwait; [email protected] (D.G.A.); [email protected] (M.S.A.); [email protected] (V.Y.D.); [email protected] (N.A.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +965-249-8984 Received: 1 May 2017; Accepted: 12 July 2017; Published: 25 July 2017 Abstract: The presence of pesticide residues in primary and derived agricultural products raises serious health concerns for consumers. The aim of this study was to assess the level of pesticide residues in commonly consumed fruits and vegetables in Kuwait. A total of 150 samples of different fresh vegetables and fruits were analyzed for the presence of 34 pesticides using the quick easy cheap effective rugged and safe (QuEChERS) multi-residue extraction, followed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) or liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Pesticide residues above the maximum residue limits (MRL) were detected in 21% of the samples and 79% of the samples had no residues of the pesticides surveyed or contained residues below the MRL. Multiple residues were present in 40% of the samples with two to four pesticides, and four samples were contaminated with more than four pesticide residues. Of the pesticides investigated, 16 were detected, of which imidacloprid, deltamethrin, cypermethrin, malathion, acetamiprid, monocrotophos, chlorpyrifos-methyl, and diazinon exceeded their MRLs.
    [Show full text]
  • EUPT-CF10-Webinar
    Results of EUPT-CF10 Incurred and spiked pesticides in rye Mette Erecius Poulsen Holte, 20 September 2016 PTs on cereals/feed 2016 EUPT-CF10 Test material Rye flour Participants 178 (160) Compulsory target pesticides 134 Voluntary target pesticides 7 Incurred pesticides 10 Spiked pesticides 8 Total no. of pesticides 18 National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark Advisory Group Quality Group Amadeo R. Fernández-Alba Antonio Valverde André de Kok Stewart Reynolds Antonio Valverde Magnus Jezussek Michelangelo Anastassiades Miguel Gamón Organising team at EURL Philippe Gros Mette Erecius Poulsen Ralf Lippold Susan Strange Herrmann Sonja Masselter Parvaneh Hajeb Stewart Reynolds Merete B. Ludwigsen Tuija Pihlström Lisbet Pilhkjær Finbarr Oregan Jens-Ole Frimann National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark Activity Dates Announcement Calendar December 2015 Target Pesticide List EUPT-Registration Website 11 January 2016 Deadline for registration 1 February 2016 Release of Specific Protocol 29 February 2016 Distribution of Test items 7 March 2016 Deadline for Receipt and Acceptance of Test Materials within 24 hr on reciept 11 April 2016 Deadline for Result Submission at 13.00 CET Deadline for submission of additional method information for 15 April 2015 false negative results Preliminary Report (only compilation of results) 30 May 2015 Final Report December 2015 National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark Target list - new pesticides and voluntary compounds
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Perspectives on Apple Production: Fruit Tree Pest Management, Regulation and New Insecticidal Chemistries
    Historical Perspectives on Apple Production: Fruit Tree Pest Management, Regulation and New Insecticidal Chemistries. Peter Jentsch Extension Associate Department of Entomology Cornell University's Hudson Valley Lab 3357 Rt. 9W; PO box 727 Highland, NY 12528 email: [email protected] Phone 845-691-7151 Mobile: 845-417-7465 http://www.nysaes.cornell.edu/ent/faculty/jentsch/ 2 Historical Perspectives on Fruit Production: Fruit Tree Pest Management, Regulation and New Chemistries. by Peter Jentsch I. Historical Use of Pesticides in Apple Production Overview of Apple Production and Pest Management Prior to 1940 Synthetic Pesticide Development and Use II. Influences Changing the Pest Management Profile in Apple Production Chemical Residues in Early Insect Management Historical Chemical Regulation Recent Regulation Developments Changing Pest Management Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 The Science Behind The Methodology Pesticide Revisions – Requirements For New Registrations III. Resistance of Insect Pests to Insecticides Resistance Pest Management Strategies IV. Reduced Risk Chemistries: New Modes of Action and the Insecticide Treadmill Fermentation Microbial Products Bt’s, Abamectins, Spinosads Juvenile Hormone Analogs Formamidines, Juvenile Hormone Analogs And Mimics Insect Growth Regulators Azadirachtin, Thiadiazine Neonicotinyls Major Reduced Risk Materials: Carboxamides, Carboxylic Acid Esters, Granulosis Viruses, Diphenyloxazolines, Insecticidal Soaps, Benzoyl Urea Growth Regulators, Tetronic Acids, Oxadiazenes , Particle Films, Phenoxypyrazoles, Pyridazinones, Spinosads, Tetrazines , Organotins, Quinolines. 3 I Historical Use of Pesticides in Apple Production Overview of Apple Production and Pest Management Prior to 1940 The apple has a rather ominous origin. Its inception is framed in the biblical text regarding the genesis of mankind. The backdrop appears to be the turbulent setting of what many scholars believe to be present day Iraq.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Chiral Analysis of Pollutants and Their Metabolites by Capillary
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Digital.CSIC Chiral analysis of pollutants and their metabolites by capillary electromigration methods Javier Hernández-Borges1, Miguel Ángel Rodríguez-Delgado1, Francisco J. García-Montelongo1, Alejandro Cifuentes2,* 1Department of Analytical Chemistry, Nutrition and Food Science, University of La Laguna, Avda. Astrofísico Fco. Sánchez s/n, 38071 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain. 2 Department of Food Analysis, Institute of Industrial Fermentations (CSIC), Juan de la Cierva 3, 28006 Madrid, Spain. Keywords: capillary electrophoresis; enantiomers; pollutants; pesticides; review; chiral analysis; CE; MEKC; CEC. Corresponding author: Dr. Alejandro Cifuentes E-mail: [email protected] Fax: +34-91-5644853; Tel: +34-91-5622900 1 Abbreviations: allyl-TER: 1-allylterguride; ANDSA: 7-aminonaphthalene-1,3-disulfonic acid; ANSA: 5-aminonaphthalene-1-sulfonic acid; ANTS: 8-aminonaphthalene-1,3,6-trisulfonic acid; BGE: background electrolyte; CM-γ-CD: carboxymethylated-γ-cyclodextrin; MCPA: (4-chloro-2-methylphenoxy)-acetic acid; MCPB: (4-chloro-2-methylphenoxy)butyric acid; 2,2-CPPA: 2-(2-chlorophenoxy)-propionic acid; 2,3-CPPA: 2-(3- chlorophenoxy)propionic acid; 2,4-CPPA: 2-(4-chlorophenoxy)-propionic acid; CMBA: 2-(4-chlorophenyl)-3-methylbutanoic acid; CA: chrysanthemic acid; MEGA: decanoyl-N-methylglucamide; DCA: dichorochrysanthemic acid; 2,4-D: (2,4- dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid; 2,4-DB: 4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)butiric acid; 2,4- DCPPA: 2-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)propionic
    [Show full text]
  • Genetically Modified Baculoviruses for Pest
    INSECT CONTROL BIOLOGICAL AND SYNTHETIC AGENTS This page intentionally left blank INSECT CONTROL BIOLOGICAL AND SYNTHETIC AGENTS EDITED BY LAWRENCE I. GILBERT SARJEET S. GILL Amsterdam • Boston • Heidelberg • London • New York • Oxford Paris • San Diego • San Francisco • Singapore • Sydney • Tokyo Academic Press is an imprint of Elsevier Academic Press, 32 Jamestown Road, London, NW1 7BU, UK 30 Corporate Drive, Suite 400, Burlington, MA 01803, USA 525 B Street, Suite 1800, San Diego, CA 92101-4495, USA ª 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved The chapters first appeared in Comprehensive Molecular Insect Science, edited by Lawrence I. Gilbert, Kostas Iatrou, and Sarjeet S. Gill (Elsevier, B.V. 2005). All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. Permissions may be sought directly from Elsevier’s Rights Department in Oxford, UK: phone (þ44) 1865 843830, fax (þ44) 1865 853333, e-mail [email protected]. Requests may also be completed on-line via the homepage (http://www.elsevier.com/locate/permissions). Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Insect control : biological and synthetic agents / editors-in-chief: Lawrence I. Gilbert, Sarjeet S. Gill. – 1st ed. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-12-381449-4 (alk. paper) 1. Insect pests–Control. 2. Insecticides. I. Gilbert, Lawrence I. (Lawrence Irwin), 1929- II. Gill, Sarjeet S. SB931.I42 2010 632’.7–dc22 2010010547 A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 978-0-12-381449-4 Cover Images: (Top Left) Important pest insect targeted by neonicotinoid insecticides: Sweet-potato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci; (Top Right) Control (bottom) and tebufenozide intoxicated by ingestion (top) larvae of the white tussock moth, from Chapter 4; (Bottom) Mode of action of Cry1A toxins, from Addendum A7.
    [Show full text]
  • ACTION: Original DATE: 08/20/2020 9:51 AM
    ACTION: Original DATE: 08/20/2020 9:51 AM TO BE RESCINDED 3745-100-10 Applicable chemicals and chemical categories. [Comment: For dates of non-regulatory government publications, publications of recognized organizations and associations, federal rules, and federal statutory provisions referenced in this rule, see paragraph (FF) of rule 3745-100-01 of the Administrative Code titled "Referenced materials."] The requirements of this chapter apply to the following chemicals and chemical categories. This rule contains three listings. Paragraph (A) of this rule is an alphabetical order listing of those chemicals that have an associated "Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS)" registry number. Paragraph (B) of this rule contains a CAS registry number order list of the same chemicals listed in paragraph (A) of this rule. Paragraph (C) of this rule contains the chemical categories for which reporting is required. These chemical categories are listed in alphabetical order and do not have CAS registry numbers. (A) Alphabetical listing: Chemical Name CAS Number abamectin (avermectin B1) 71751-41-2 acephate (acetylphosphoramidothioic acid o,s-dimethyl ester) 30560-19-1 acetaldehyde 75-07-0 acetamide 60-35-5 acetonitrile 75-05-8 acetophenone 98-86-2 2-acetylaminofluorene 53-96-3 acifluorfen, sodium salt [5-(2-chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy)-2- 62476-59-9 nitrobenzoic acid, sodium salt] acrolein 107-02-8 acrylamide 79-06-1 acrylic acid 79-10-7 acrylonitrile 107-13-1 [ stylesheet: rule.xsl 2.14, authoring tool: RAS XMetaL R2_0F1, (dv: 0, p: 185720, pa:
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,852,618 B2 Clough (45) Date of Patent: Oct
    USOO8852618B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,852,618 B2 Clough (45) Date of Patent: Oct. 7, 2014 (54) INSECTICIDAL MIXTURE CONTAINING CA 2429218 A1 6, 2002 GAMMA-CYHALOTHRN CH 689326 A5 4f1995 EP O237227 A1 9, 1987 EP 0771526 A2 5, 1997 (75) Inventor: Martin Stephen Clough, Bracknell EP O988788 A1 3f2000 (GB) FR 272O230 A1 12/1995 JP 63. 126805 A2 5, 1988 (73) Assignee: Syngenta Limited, Guildford (GB) JP 63126805 A2 5, 1988 JP 63126805 5, 1998 c - r WO WO 86 O7525 A1 12, 1986 (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this WO WO 93 03618 A2 3, 1993 patent is extended or adjusted under 35 WO WO95 229O2 A1 8/1995 U.S.C. 154(b) by 824 days. WO WO9533380 A1 12, 1995 WO WO 96 16543 A2 6, 1996 (21) Appl. No.: 12/633,063 WO WO97 06687 A1 2/1997 WO WO974O692 A1 11, 1997 (22) Filed: Dec.a V88, 2009 WO WOOOO2453 A1 1, 2000 OTHER PUBLICATIONS (65) Prior Publication Data US 201O/OO81714 A1 Apr. 1, 2010 Canadian Office Action (Applin. No. 2,452,515 filed: Jul. 10, 2002) mailing date Oct. 1, 2010 (pp. 1-2). Related U.S. Application Data Allen et al. Transgenic & Conventional Insect & Weed Control Sys tems; Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference, vol. 2, 1065 (62) Division of application No. 10/484.745, filed as 1068 (1999), USA. application No. PCT/GB02/03181 on Jul. 10, 2002, Anonymous; Pesticide Mixtures for Control of Insect and Acarid now Pat. No.
    [Show full text]
  • NASTTPO CFATS Information 2Nd Edition
    National Association of SARA Title III Program Officials Concerned with the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act January 13, 2008 Issue 07-01 2nd Edition The Department of Homeland Security has adopted 6 CFR Part 27, a new regulation mandated by Congress, known as Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS). The regulation is intended to fill a security gap in our country’s anti-terrorism efforts by identifying and improving the security of chemicals that are potentially at a high level of risk for release, theft, or sabotage. LEPCs and SERCs should alert EPCRA & RMP reporting facilities about these requirements. No reports are due to the LEPCs and SERCs under these requirements; however, given the potential for security requirements to have an impact on facility access for emergency responders and on emergency plans, it is critical for local planners, responders and facilities to communicate in order for a facility to satisfy the regulatory requirements. In order to aid LEPCs, SERCs and facilities in understanding these new requirements we have prepared some short-hand aids. Following this cover page is a key issue comparison between EPCRA, RMP and the CFATS regulation. As requirements may change the user is counseled to look for updated information. Following the side-by-side comparison we have edited the EPA “List of Lists” to add the Appendix A list of chemicals and thresholds from the CFATS program. This list may change and we will update these materials when that happens. The initial requirement for a facility with an Appendix A chemical at or over the threshold is to submit a Top-Screen.
    [Show full text]
  • Table II. EPCRA Section 313 Chemical List for Reporting Year 2017 (Including Toxic Chemical Categories)
    Table II. EPCRA Section 313 Chemical List For Reporting Year 2017 (including Toxic Chemical Categories) Individually listed EPCRA Section 313 chemicals with CAS numbers are arranged alphabetically starting on page II-3. Following the alphabetical list, the EPCRA Section 313 chemicals are arranged in CAS number order. Covered chemical categories follow. Note: Chemicals may be added to or deleted from the list. The Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Call Center or the TRI-Listed Chemicals website will provide up-to-date information on the status of these changes. See section B.3.c of the instructions for more information on the de minimis % limits listed below. There are no de minimis levels for PBT chemicals since the de minimis exemption is not available for these chemicals (an asterisk appears where a de minimis limit would otherwise appear in Table II). However, for purposes of the supplier notification requirement only, such limits are provided in Appendix C. Chemical Qualifiers Certain EPCRA Section 313 chemicals listed in Table II have parenthetic “qualifiers.” These qualifiers indicate that these EPCRA Section 313 chemicals are subject to the section 313 reporting requirements if manufactured, processed, or otherwise used in a specific form or when a certain activity is performed. An EPCRA Section 313 chemical that is listed without a qualifier is subject to reporting in all forms in which it is manufactured, processed, and otherwise used. The following chemicals are reportable only if they are manufactured, processed, or otherwise used in the specific form(s) listed below: Chemical/ Chemical Category CAS Number Qualifier Aluminum (fume or dust) 7429-90-5 Only if it is a fume or dust form.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Interim Registration Review Decision for Imidacloprid
    Docket Number EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0844 www.regulations.gov Imidacloprid Proposed Interim Registration Review Decision Case Number 7605 January 2020 Approved by: Elissa Reaves, Ph.D. Acting Director Pesticide Re-evaluation Division Date: __ 1-22-2020 __ Docket Number EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0844 www.regulations.gov Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 4 A. Summary of Imidacloprid Registration Review............................................................... 5 B. Summary of Public Comments on the Draft Risk Assessments and Agency Responses 7 II. USE AND USAGE ............................................................................................................... 14 III. SCIENTIFIC ASSESSMENTS ......................................................................................... 15 A. Human Health Risks....................................................................................................... 15 1. Risk Summary and Characterization .......................................................................... 15 2. Human Incidents and Epidemiology .......................................................................... 17 3. Tolerances ................................................................................................................... 18 4. Human Health Data Needs ......................................................................................... 18 B. Ecological Risks ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]