DOCSLIB.ORG

Port Comprehensive Market Study 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Port Comprehensive Market Study 2020 Heartland Port Project Comprehensive market study 2020 May 2020 Title 0 Contents Executive summary ............................................................................................................................1 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................7 1.1 Objective ............................................................................................................................................. 8 1.2 Structure of the report ........................................................................................................................ 8 1.3 The Heartland Port—project location and study area ........................................................................ 9 2. Freight transportation system in Central Missouri ......................................................................... 10 2.1 Missouri’s freight network ................................................................................................................ 10 2.2 Highways ........................................................................................................................................... 10 2.2 Railroads............................................................................................................................................ 13 2.3 Waterways and public and private ports, marine terminals, and docks .......................................... 13 2.3.1 Marine Highways ....................................................................................................................... 13 2.3.2 Public Port Authorities ............................................................................................................... 15 2.3.3 Private river terminals and docks .............................................................................................. 17 2.3.4 Regional highway connectivity and planned improvements ..................................................... 20 3. Market analysis ............................................................................................................................ 21 3.1 Industry analysis ................................................................................................................................ 21 3.1.1 Market survey—key findings ..................................................................................................... 21 3.1.2 Industries with higher potential to generate traffic for the port .............................................. 25 3.2 State level market trends .................................................................................................................. 25 3.2.1 Non-containerized cargoes ........................................................................................................ 25 3.2.2 Containerized cargoes ................................................................................................................ 27 3.3 Location of freight generators/attractors ......................................................................................... 27 3.3.1 On-farm and commercial grain storage sites ............................................................................. 28 3.3.2 Grain/soybean processors ......................................................................................................... 32 3.3.3 Local livestock and poultry production sites.............................................................................. 33 3.3.4 Ethanol/biodiesel plants ............................................................................................................ 40 3.3.5 Mining sites: metals/nonmetals ................................................................................................ 41 3.3.6 Forestry and lumber ................................................................................................................... 42 3.4 Commodity port flow analysis .......................................................................................................... 44 3.4.1 Soybeans .................................................................................................................................... 45 3.4.2 Corn ............................................................................................................................................ 50 3.4.3 Grain Sorghum ........................................................................................................................... 55 3.4.4 Wheat ......................................................................................................................................... 58 Heartland Port Project—Comprehensive market study 2020 i 3.5 Market 30-year forecast of non-containerized cargoes ................................................................... 59 3.5.1 Potential non-containerized volumes from the Heartland Port Project study area .................. 59 4. Heartland Port: route economics and key target markets .............................................................. 62 4.1 General Assumptions ........................................................................................................................ 62 4.2 Non-containerized cargoes ............................................................................................................... 64 4.2.1 Incumbent routes ....................................................................................................................... 64 4.2.2 Route costs via incumbent routes (non-containerized)............................................................. 66 4.2.3 Route costs via the Heartland Port Project ................................................................................ 69 4.2.4 Route cost savings offered by the heartland port Project for non-containerized cargo ........... 70 4.2.5 Available non-container volume from the 24-county area ....................................................... 71 4.2.6 Potential market share captured by the Heartland Port ........................................................... 72 4.3 Containerized cargoes ....................................................................................................................... 74 4.3.1 Incumbent routes ....................................................................................................................... 74 4.3.2 Route costs via incumbent routes (containerized) .................................................................... 76 4.3.3 Route costs via the Heartland Port Project ................................................................................ 76 4.3.4 Route cost savings offered by the Heartland Port Project for containerized cargo .................. 77 4.3.5 Containerized cargo market shares and available volume for the 24-county area ................... 79 4.3.6 Potentially divertible intact intermodal imports to the 24-county study area.......................... 82 4.4 Base case volume forecast summary ................................................................................................ 90 5. Conceptual structure of the Heartland Port concession and operational model .............................. 92 5.1 Potential structure of the Heartland Port concession ...................................................................... 92 5.2 Conceptual organizational structure ................................................................................................ 93 5.2.1 Professional staff ........................................................................................................................ 94 5.2.2 Laborers ..................................................................................................................................... 95 5.2.3 Outsourced functions................................................................................................................. 96 5.3 Conceptual operational layout and project site ............................................................................... 96 5.3.1 Berth, facility, and equipment ................................................................................................... 96 5.3.2 Development opportunity A: South Site only ............................................................................ 99 6. Financial analysis ....................................................................................................................... 103 6.1 Description of the financial model .................................................................................................. 103 6.2 Base Case volumes .......................................................................................................................... 105 6.3 Combination of business segments analyzed ................................................................................. 106 6.3.1 Indicative capex ....................................................................................................................... 106 6.3.2 Indicative opex ......................................................................................................................... 109 Heartland Port Project—Comprehensive market study 2020 ii 6.3.3 Handling rates .......................................................................................................................... 111 6.4 Financial analysis ............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Synthesis of Modern Rail Transportation Engineering Practices Donald D
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Open-Access* Master's Theses from the University Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln of Nebraska-Lincoln 9-1977 A Synthesis of Modern Rail Transportation Engineering Practices Donald D. Cook University of Nebraska-Lincoln Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/opentheses Part of the Civil Engineering Commons Cook, Donald D., "A Synthesis of Modern Rail Transportation Engineering Practices" (1977). Open-Access* Master's Theses from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. 37. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/opentheses/37 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Open-Access* Master's Theses from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. A SYNTHESIS OF MODERN RAIL TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING PRACTICES by Donald D. Cook A THESIS Presented to the Faculty of The Graduate College in the University of Nebraska In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements For the Degree of Master of Science Department of Civil Engineering Under the Supervision of Dr. Edward R. Post Dr. Patrick J. McCoy Dr. Edward N. Wilson Lincoln, Nebraska September, 1977 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to thank Dr. E. R. Post, Dr. P. T. M~Coy, and Dr. E. N. Wilson, my thesis advisory corrmittee for their assistance. Thanks are also due Sharon Nichols and Kim Seip whose typing skills saved me a great amount of anguish and Gary Steffans who assisted with the chapter on signaling.
    [Show full text]
  • MISSOURI’S You Can Get Involved INFRASTRUCTURE
    REPORT CARD FOR HowMISSOURI’S You Can Get Involved INFRASTRUCTURE 2018 G.P.A. “Don’t wait. The time will never be just right.” –Mark Twain Missouri Infrastructure 2013 Report Card 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ........................................................................................................... 4 Aviation ............................................................................................................................... 6 Bridges ...............................................................................................................................12 Dams ..................................................................................................................................16 Drinking Water ................................................................................................................ 21 Energy ...............................................................................................................................24 Inland Waterways ............................................................................................................. 28 Levees ...............................................................................................................................34 Ports ................................................................................................................................... 38 Rail ....................................................................................................................................42 Roads
    [Show full text]
  • UPPER CANADA RAILWAY SOCIETY BOX 122 STATION "A" TORONTO, ONTARIO Photo
    UPPER CANADA RAILWAY SOCIETY BOX 122 STATION "A" TORONTO, ONTARIO Photo On Oct. 15, 1989, CPR's yard trackage in Goderlch, Ont. was almost completely dismantled, this being the western terminus of the 80- mile Goderlch Sub. from Guelph. This view, looking west toward Lake Huron, shows the station (which, hopefully, will survive) and the engine shed, right. ^^^^^ Western visitor: two of these Edmonton Transit trolley coaches are in Toronto for tests. The bodies were built by General Motors and the motors and controls by Brown Boveri; the 100-unit order commenced service in the Alberta capital eight years ago. This view of 178 was taken in Edmonton on July 13, 1983. _Dave Chalmers Survivor: 60 years young and still apparently going strong in CPR Engineering Dept. service was former ore car 376784, photographed on a siding beside the railway's West Toronto Shop, Nov. 4, 1989. It was built by Canadian Car & Foundry to the designs of the Hart- Otis Car Co.; the 25-foot car was designed to hold 80 tons of nickel ore. The railway ordered several hundred such cars in the 1920s. __john D. Thompson UCRS Newsletter • January 1990 * 3 CP Rail's New The tenninal will have four 609 metre (2,000 foot) working tracks under three gantry cranes, along with six storage and makeup tracks of similar length. The accompanying cross- sectional schematic shows the positioning of the cranes relative to the tracks. The facility will be connected to the MacTier VAUGHAN Subdivision by two 1,525 metre (5,000 foot) lead tracks; a wye track layout wfll permit access and egress from both north and south.
    [Show full text]
  • Bridge Safety Standards Compliance Manual Final.Pdf
    Bridge Safety Standards Compliance Manual October 2018 Office of Railroad Safety Bridge Safety Standards Compliance Manual Table of Contents CHAPTER 1 – INTRODUCTION AND GENERAL GUIDANCE.......................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION TO THIS MANUAL ............................................................................................... 1 SAFETY .................................................................................................................................... 1 BRIDGE SAFETY OVERSIGHT ..................................................................................................... 1 ACTIVITY-CODE SPECIFIC GUIDANCE ......................................................................................... 2 PRIORITIZING OVERSIGHT ACTIVITIES ........................................................................................ 4 OPENING CONFERENCE ............................................................................................................ 6 CLOSING CONFERENCE ............................................................................................................ 6 DEFECT TRACKING ................................................................................................................... 6 CHAPTER 2 – FIELD REPORTING PROCEDURES AND FORMS .................................................... 8 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 8 INSPECTION REPORT, FORM FRA F6180.96
    [Show full text]
  • Baltimore State Center Site Alternative Land Use Study
    Baltimore State Center Site Alternative Land Use Study Prepared for: Prepared by: and Final Report January 2018 ALTERNATIVE LAND USE STUDY BALTIMORE STATE CENTER SITE Table of Contents Item Page Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................................................................. i 1. Introduction and Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Site Area Review ............................................................................................................................................................................ 11 3. Peer City Case Studies ................................................................................................................................................................ 23 4. State Center Site – Land Use Concepts ................................................................................................................................ 86 5. Conclusions ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 92 Page i ALTERNATIVE LAND USE STUDY BALTIMORE STATE CENTER SITE 1. Introduction and Executive Summary Project Background The Maryland Stadium Authority retained Crossroads Consulting Services, LLC (Crossroads), in association with Valbridge
    [Show full text]
  • Salt Lake Inland Port Market Assessment Authored By: Natalie Gochnour I Director, Kem C
    Research Brief August 2016 Salt Lake Inland Port Market Assessment Authored by: Natalie Gochnour I Director, Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute Table of Contents Executive Summary Executive Summary . 1 The World Trade Center Utah contracted with the Kem Background and History . 5 C . Gardner Policy Institute to prepare a preliminary as- Research Scope and Limitations . 6 sessment of the practicality and market context for the Essential Characteristics of an Inland Port . 6 development of an inland port in Salt Lake County . The Key Findings from Scoping Interviews . 7 Gardner Policy Institute researched background informa- Port Governance . 9 tion, reviewed past local studies, inventoried inland ports Public Incentives . .. 11 of interest, conducted scoping interviews, and prepared Market Characteristics .. 12 summary information on the technical feasibility of cre- Foreign Trade Zone Status and Privileges . 14 ating an inland port in Salt Lake County . This Executive Right to Work Laws . 14 Summary includes a summary of the key findings from Labor Market Conditions . 15 the data, research, and interviews . Required Infrastructure Improvements Key Findings and off-site Improvement Costs . 16 Next Steps . 18 Our research confirmed that Salt Lake County meets many of the essential criteria for developing an inland REFERENCES . 19 port . However, there are numerous issues that will require APPENDIX A . 20 additional data collection, analysis, public discussion, Summary of past studies and, ultimately, investment . APPENDIX B . 21 We have distilled our research down into 17 key findings: History of inland port policy discussion in Utah APPENDIX C . 22 1 . Significant nationwide interest in inland port de- Salt Lake County Global Cities Initiative and velopment—Logistics hubs that combine container - Regional Export Plan ized rail, trucking interchange, and warehousing and APPENDIX D .
    [Show full text]
  • 5 - 2 Pre-Feasibility Study on Coal Transportation
    5 - 2 PRE-FEASIBILITY STUDY ON COAL TRANSPORTATION BETWEEN QASIM AND LAKHRA BY RAILWAY Appendix 5-2 PREPARATORY SURVEY ON LAKHRA COAL FIRED THERMAL POWER PLANT CONSTRUCTION PROJECT IN PAKISTAN PRE-FEASIBLITY STUDY ON COAL TRANSPORTATION BETWEEN QASIM AND LAKHRA BY RAILWAY FINAL REPORT October 2016 Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. Appendix 5-2 Appendix 5-2 PROJECT LOCATION MAP Appendix 5-2 Preparatory Survey on Lakhra Coal-Fired Thermal Power Plant Construction Project in Pakistan Pre-feasibility Study on Coal Transportation between Qasim and Lakhra by Railway Final Report Preparatory Survey on Lakhra Coal-Fired Thermal Power Plant Construction Project in Pakistan Pre-feasibility Study on Coal Transportation between Qasim and Lakhra by Railway FINAL REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary Chapter 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background of the Project ........................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Project Scope ............................................................................................................................ 2 1.3 Study Purpose .......................................................................................................................... 3 Chapter 2 Existing Railway Facilities ............................................................................................... 4 2.1 Key Feature of
    [Show full text]
  • FEATURES the World's Leading and Only Monthly Magazine for the Dry
    i DRY CARGO DC international WWW.DRYCARGOMAG.COM ISSUE NO. 237 JULY 2020 FEATURES Bauxite & Alumina Trades Inland Rail & Barge Bulker Classification Cranes Containerized Bulk Handling & Technology The world’s leading and only monthly magazine for the dry bulk industry CONTENTS E-Crane, manufacturer of high production bulk material and scrap cranes. We at E-Crane DCi offer tailor-made solutions to meet your needs for high productivity and reliable handling of scrap, grain, coal, cement clinker, or any other bulk material, while striving to optimize your operation, increase efficiency, and lower costs. E-Crane Worldwide Koekoeklaan 53 9991 Adegem, Belgium T: +32 (9) 378 04 44 E: [email protected] E-Crane USA 1332 Freese Works Place Galion, OH 44833, USA M: +1 (614) 579 3732 T: +1 (419) 468 0090 E: [email protected] PUBLISHERS Jason Chinnock WWW.DRYCARGOMAG.COM JULY 2020 issue [email protected] Andrew Hucker-Brown [email protected] EDITORIAL Louise Dodds-Ely Editor [email protected] Jay Venter Deputy Editor featuring... [email protected] Samantha Smith Directories TRADE & COMMODITIES [email protected] Bernice van Wyk Office Manager Solid support for grain and soya trade 2 [email protected] US moves to oust China as Brazil’s main trading partner 3 SALES BAUXITE & ALUMINA TRADES: COVID-19 EXACERBATES AN ALREADY DIFFICULT MARKET 4 Matthew Currin Senior Sales [email protected] Executive Zack Venter Advertisement Sales [email protected] Executive SHIPPING & TRANSPORT CORRESPONDENTS ABB pioneers drydock-to-drydock turbocharger service
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Highways and Marine Freight Development in the MAFC´
    Marine Highways and Marine Freight Development in the MAFC´ Source: NTAD 2012 Working Session ■ MAFC Annual Meeting ■ April 22-25, 2014 ■ Chicago, Illinois MAFC Marine Highways L A K E S U P E R ´ I O n| R n| Û ¤£M90 n| n|n| ÛÛ n| n| Û Legend n| L MN n| n| A n| Major Port n| K n| E Û Lock H U L R ÛÛn| Mega Region A Û n| O K Û ¤£M35 N E Urban Area Û Û Û Û WI Û Û M Û Û MAFC Hi Volume M Û I C MI I ¤£M77 Û H Freight Network S n| n| S I n| E I I Û G S n| R Major Rail Corridor A E S IP E N n| n| Û £M75 K n| P ¤ A Û L n| I n| R Û n| n| n| n| ¤£M71 IV n|Û n|n| Û E Ûn|n| £M29 IA Û n| ¤ R Û Û Û Û Û Û Û Û Û Û Û M R Û I E OH S Û IV IN S Û R O Û¤£M70 U Û ¤£M55 IS R O Û I Û IN R Û L Û I Û V IL Û E Û n|OHIO RIVER R Û Û IL Û Û Û n| Û Û Û n| n|Û KS Û MO n| n| Û Û KY Û Û n| ¤£M40 ¤£M65 Source: NTAD 2012; US Army Corps of Engineers State DOTs and their planning partners in the public and private sector are taking steps to better understand, advocate for, and integrate maritime freight into their state and regional transportation and economic development systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Connecting Maritime Supply Chain Professionals for More Than 100 Years! P Ort F Acilities
    Connecting Maritime Supply Chain Professionals for more than 100 Years! P ORT F ACILITIES “The Voice of Port Industries” Build Connections & Discover Opportunity Join the VMA at VAmaritime.com 757-622-2639 21 PORT FACILITIES Hampton Roads Harbor ........................................................ 21 Hampton Roads Port Facility Guide .............................................. 24 Hampton Roads Terminal Summary .............................................. 32 General Cargo Terminals ....................................................... 41 Coal Terminals ................................................................ 49 Refrigerated Facilities ......................................................... 52 Dry Bulk and Grain Handling Facilities ........................................... 53 Liquid Bulk Terminals .......................................................... 56 ACILITIES Marine Cargo Terminals ....................................................... 62 F ORT P Commercial Marine Facilities guide The Commercial Marine Facilities Guide is a continuation of VMA providing valuable resources for the maritime business community. www.vamaritime.com/PortFacilities The VMA Commercial Marine Facilities Guide is an online reference tool for those doing business in Virginia, the Mid-West, or internationally. Our guide promotes the private and public marine cargo terminals and extensive cargo handling capabilities offered in Virginia’s Ports. Break Bulk Coal Container Dry Bulk Liquid Bulk Passenger Refrigerated RO/RO PORT FACILITIES
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Industrial Coatings, LLC Facilities/East
    VMA Tab 2 Port Facilities/East Coast Ad 2/21/14 8:53 AM Page 1 SHIP REPAIR & DRYDOCKS East Coast Repair and Fabrication is a marine repair facility. Our services include Ship Repair Dry-docks, state-of-the-art high capacity fabrication and extensive off-site mobile repair crews.. East Coast Repair and Fabrication, LLC is a leading force in the Marine, Industrial and Commercial sectors, specializing in: • Dry dock • Shop Fabrication • Mobile Repair Crews • Ship Alterations and Conversions • Small Boats • New Construction • Voyage Repairs CONTACT US P ORT East Coast Repair & Fabrication, LLC. Norfolk Virginia 757.455.9600 F [Emergency calls 757.342.4539] ACILITIES http://www.ecrandf.com EMPLOYMENT AGENCY Staffing Solutions Company committed to delivering the highest quality in services for the marine industrial and commercial markets. • Mid-Management • Supervisors • Skilled Trades • Labors Our standard: Total Customer Satisfaction! CONTACT US HORIZON | Chesapeake, Virginia 23325 PHONE: 757.965.4590 | TOLL FREE: 866.368.9273 | FAX: 757.965.7914 [email protected] | www.horizonservicesllc.com Marine Industrial Coatings, LLC Masters in coatings of marine and industrial equipment, components, structures and surfaces. Painting with Non-High Solids Q Blasting including Blast Protection Painting with 100% Solids Coatings Q Preparation and Preservation of Dampening Tiles Lead Abatement Q Blast and Paint Shop Facility for Raw Material or Fabricated Structures ~ MARINE COATINGS ~ CONTACT US >ÀiÊEÊ`ÕÃÌÀ>Ê >Ì}Ã]Ê °ÊÊNÊÊ*ÀÌÃÕÌ Ê6À}>ÊÓÎÇäÎ *"
    [Show full text]
  • Lake and River Port Facilities 6.6.1
    CHAPTER 6 6.6 LAKE AND RIVER PORT FACILITIES 6.6.1. INTRODUCTION Water ports, by nature, are inter‐modal. People and freight traveling by water must arrive and depart by another transportation mode. Inter‐modal connectors are roads that provide access to water ports or rail services. Truck and other vehicular congestion on or near the inter‐modal connections affect ports that rely on trucks for commodity transfer. Improvements to roadways that connect to ports increase the efficiency of ports, benefit trade, and contribute to employment growth and regional productivity. With statistics such as fourth, ⅓, 58.8 million and 5.7 billion – as in: • Fourth in the nation for total water tonnage moved • The Ohio River System accounting for ⅓ of all annual U.S. inland waterborne commerce by tonnage • The Lake Erie System annually accommodates 58.8 million tons of commodities moving to, from and within Ohio • $5.7 billion in the annual value of Ohio port shipments on Lake Erie In 2001, more than 58,800,000 tons of commodities moved to, from, and within Ohio on the Great Lakes; this was a 7% decline from 63.3 million tons from 1995. The annual value of Ohio port shipments on Lake Erie equals $5,700,000,000. Coal accounts for 22,000,000 tons (39%) of the state’s total traffic‐iron ore, and represents 13,200,000 tons (22%) of the State’s total Great Lake tonnage. There are no water ports located in either Mahoning or Trumbull Counties. However, the two Ports of Ashtabula and Conneaut are located on Lake Erie north of the Eastgate planning area in northern Ashtabula County.
    [Show full text]