DOCSLIB.ORG

EUROPEAN RESEARCH AREA Progress Report 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
EUROPEAN RESEARCH AREA Progress Report 2018 EUROPEAN RESEARCH AREA Progress Report 2018 Country Profile DENMARK EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Research and Innovation Directorate A — Policy Development and Coordination Unit A2 — Research and Innovation Strategy Contact: Arie Van Der Zwan E-mail: [email protected] [email protected] European Commission B-1049 Brussels EUROPE DIRECT is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) The information given is free, as are most calls (though some operators, phone boxes or hotels may charge you) LEGAL NOTICE Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use which might be made of the following information. The views expressed in this publication are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Commission. More information on the European Union is available on the internet (http://europa.eu). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2019. PDF ISBN 978-92-79-99765-5 doi:10.2777/022506 KI-02-19-109-EN-N © European Union, 2019. Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Country profile: Denmark COUNTRY SNAPSHOT Indicator Performance Progress since ERA monitoring 2016 Reference Lead/Gap Reference Lead/Gap Trend Name Score Cluster EU-28 CAGR EU-28 year (Δ %) Period (Δ % pt) (2007-18) Adjusted Research Excellence Indicator (AREI) 2016 78.6 1 75 45.0 2013-16 7.1% 3.9 3.2% GBARD as share of GDP 2016 0.92% 1 45 0.64% 2014-16 -4.0% -1.6 -2.4% Priority 1 EIS Summary Innovation Index (SII) 2017 0.668 1 32 0.504 2015-17 -1.2% -3.1 1.9% A - GBARD to transnatl coop (EUR/researcher) 2016 2 501 3 -33 3 739 2014-16 -7.1% -11.0 3.9% A - Collab papers w/ERA per 1 000 researchers 2016 117 2 66 71 2014-16 7.5% 4.2 3.3% A - Public-to-public partnerships (EUR/researcher) 2016 1 222 2 119 558 2014-16 -7.3% -8.0 0.7% B - Roadmap for ESFRI projects National roadmap implemented in 2015, ESFRI projects identified, investment needs identified Priority 2 B - Participation in ESFRI Projects and Landmarks (combined) 2018 35% 2 0 35% 2016-18 0.8% -14.2 15.0% B - Participation in developing ESFRI Projects 2018 22% 2 -24 29% 2016-18 8.0% -10.6 18.6% B - Participation in operational ESFRI Landmarks 2018 41% 2 9 37% 2016-18 -4.9% -16.2 11.3% EURAXESS job ads per 1 000 researchers 2016 21.6 3 -49 42.1 2014-16 13.3% 18.3 -5.0% Open, transparent, merit-based hiring process 2016 68% 2 4 65% 2012-16 7.0% -0.5 7.5% Priority 3 Share of doctoral students from EU countries 2016 17.1% 1 139 7.1% 2013-16 5.6% 1.8 3.9% Share of women among Grade A in HES 2016 21% 3 -12 24% 2014-16 6.9% 5.9 1.0% Gender dimension in research content 2014-17(R) 1.10 2 5 1.05 2011-14 to 2014-17(R) 0.7% -1.8 2.5% Priority 4 Share of female PhD graduates 2016 48% 3 1 48% 2013-16 2.4% 2.0 0.4% A - Firms coop with univ, gov, res inst 2014 16.3% 2 9 15.0% Not computed A - Firms coop with univ 2014Not computed 2012-14 1.9% 1.2 0.7% A - Firms coop with gov, res inst 2014Not computed 2012-14 -21.2% -25.3 4.0% A - Share of public R&D funded privately 2015 4.3% 3 -39 7.0% 2013-15 6.7% 7.9 -1.2% A - Public-private collab papers per capita 2017 162.8 1 298 40.9 2014-17 1.3% 0.9 0.4% Priority 5 B - Share of papers in Open Access (Total) 2016 51.5% 2 4 49.3% Not computed B - Share of papers in Open Access (Gold) 2016 46.4% 2 9 42.7% Not computed B - Share of papers in Open Access (Green) 2016 23.3% 2 -9 25.6% Not computed B - Share life science papers with OA dataset(s) 2017 2.8% 2 10 2.6% 2013-17 0.2% -2.4 2.6% Collab papers w/non-ERA per 1 000 researchers 2016 81 1 48 54 2014-16 8.5% 4.1 4.4% Share of doctoral students from outside EU 2016 16.6% 2 20 13.9% 2013-16 3.4% -0.4 3.8% Share med & high tech product export 2017 48% 2 -15 57% 2015-17 0.2% -0.3 0.4% Priority 6 Share Knowledge intensive service export 2016 72% 2 4 69% 2014-16 -3.9% -4.5 0.6% Note: (:) = missing data, more notes and flags can be found in the “Annex: Methodological notes”. (R) = rolling averages (e.g. average scores across 2007–2010, 2008–2011… 2014–2017) have been used to measure performance and growth due to pronounced short-term fluctuations. Refer to the “Annex: Guide to reading the quantitative results tables (country snapshots)” for guidance in interpreting the data presented above. Further information on the presented indicators is available in the 2018 ERA Monitoring Handbook. 1 Country profile: Denmark COUNTRY NARRATIVE Summary The Danish research system displayed its best performances on Priority 1 (More effective national research systems). The three scores calculated here put the country well above the ERA average (Cluster 1) and the EU-28 benchmarks for all indicators. Denmark has been slowly losing some of its lead on other EU-28 countries for two of these three indicators, however. In a second set of Priorities, Denmark’s performances were mostly above (Cluster 2) ERA average, with one indicator well above (Cluster 1) the ERA average. Three priorities fit this description for Denmark: Priority 2b (Make optimal use of public investments in research infrastructures); Priority 5b (Open access); Priority 6 (International collaboration). In Priority 2b, Denmark has lost ground to the Member States overall since the last ERA monitoring exercise, whereas in Priority 5b and Priority 6, Denmark’s trajectories in recent years have been more closely in line with trends at the EU-28 level. In the remaining four priorities, Denmark had at least one score that was just below the ERA average (Cluster 3), but also scores above or well above the ERA average. These included Priority 2a (Transnational cooperation); Priority 3 (An open labour market for researchers); Priority 4 (Gender equality and gender mainstreaming in research); and Priority 5a (Knowledge transfer). While Denmark showed progress on a number of indicators, there were also some specific spots where trajectories were less encouraging, which will be discussed in the individual priority sections below. Denmark had no performances that would have positioned among countries with scores well below ERA average (Cluster 4). To the extent that data was available, below the country profile also analyses progress with the implementation of the ERA National Action Plan. The overall assessment of Denmark’s implementation of its NAP is positive. It achieved progress under most of the priorities but some of the proposed actions and objectives lacked concrete indicators and timelines. The most substantial progress was achieved under sub priority 2a. Denmark took numerous actions to maintain its high level of participation in Horizon 2020. These actions include the establishment of a Strategic Reference Group, mapping the Danish participation in H2020, publishing report ‘Evaluations and evaluators in Horizon 2020’ and continuously providing support and advice on H2020. Another important development happened under Priority 1. RESEARCH 2025 catalogue was published by the Ministry of Higher Education and Science. It will guide the country’s strategic investments from the perspective of the private sectors, knowledge institutions and governmental bodies. Denmark has also taken some actions to further the objective set under sub priority 5b that include publishing of a new National Strategy for Open and monitoring the progress of open access. Opening of Sino-Danish Centre for Education and Research in Beijing, adoption of the Arctic and Cluster 2.0. strategies have marked the Danish progress under Priority 6. 1. More effective national research systems On Priority 1 (More effective national research systems), Denmark displayed its best performances. The three scores calculated here put the country well above the ERA average (Cluster 1) and the EU-28 benchmarks. This was particularly true for the headline indicator, the Adjusted Research Excellence Indicator (AREI). Here, the country’s score was almost 79, compared to 45 for the Member States overall. The country’s performance on the headline indicator has also increased at a yearly rate higher than that of the EU-28 trend, extending Denmark’s lead. Between 2013 and 2016, Denmark’s CAGR on this indicator was 7.1 %, compared to a trend of 3.2 % for the EU-28. Denmark has been slowly losing some of its lead on other EU-28 countries for the two complementary indicators (GBARD as a share of GDP, and the Summary Innovation Index), however. Denmark is a high performer with a strong research system, which produces high quality scientific outputs (Christensen J.L., Christensen, P., Knudsen, 2017). However, its performance could be further improved in terms of innovations. In 2014, Innovation Fund Denmark (IFD) was established with the aim to make R&D funding more efficient and effective while focusing on challenge-driven research and innovation. It is a result of a merger between the Danish National 2 Country profile: Denmark Advanced Technology Foundation, the Danish Council for Strategic Research, and parts of the Danish Council for Technology and Innovation.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • COUNCIL of the EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 20 September 2013 (OR. En) 13812/13 ADD 4 RECH 410 COMPET 663 MI 779 TELECOM 238 COVER N
    COUNCIL OF Brussels, 20 September 2013 THE EUROPEAN UNION (OR. en) 13812/13 ADD 4 RECH 410 COMPET 663 MI 779 TELECOM 238 COVER NOTE From: Secretary-General of the European Commission, signed by Mr Jordi AYET PUIGARNAU, Director date of receipt: 20 September 2013 To: Mr Uwe CORSEPIUS, Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union No. Cion doc.: SWD(2013) 333 final 4/5 Subject: COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT National measures in support of ERA Member States of the European Union Accompanying the document REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT EUROPEAN RESEARCH AREA PROGRESS REPORT 2013 Delegations will find attached document SWD(2013) 333 final 4/5 . Encl.: SWD(2013) 333 final 4/5 13812/13 ADD 4 AFG/nj DG G III EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 20.9.2013 SWD(2013) 333 final 4/5 COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT National measures in support of ERA Member States of the European Union Accompanying the document REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT EUROPEAN RESEARCH AREA PROGRESS REPORT 2013 {COM(2013) 637 final} EN EN Austria ERA Priority ERA Action National Measure contributing to ERA Year Adoption How the measure contributes to ERA The Austrian Research, Technological Development and Innovation Strategy “Becoming an Innovation Leader: Realising Potentials, Increasing Dynamics, Creating the Future" was published in March 2011. It introduces a coordinated vision and strategy across all ministries in charge of RTDI and identifies new challenges. Also in 2011 a Task Force of senior officials was put in place to coordinate activities from the strategic perspective and monitor the implementation of this strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Open Access in Practice – Results and Recommendations from the Danish Project (2017-2018)
    Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Sep 26, 2021 Green Open Access in Practice – results and recommendations from the Danish project (2017-2018) Sand, Ane Ahrenkiel; Schneider, Anette Wergeland Publication date: 2019 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link back to DTU Orbit Citation (APA): Sand, A. A. (Author), & Schneider, A. W. (Author). (2019). Green Open Access in Practice – results and recommendations from the Danish project (2017-2018). Sound/Visual production (digital), Technical University of Denmark. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. GREEN OPEN ACCESS IN PRACTICE – results and recommendations from the Danish project (2017-2018) ANE AHRENKIEL SAND and ANETTE WERGELAND SCHNEIDER EMBARGO UKSG 42nd Annual Conference and Exhibition: Telford, UK PERMITTED ADDITIONAL OPEN ACCESS ISSUES DATE: April 08 2019–April 10 2019 VERSIONS SYSTEM PUBLISHER INFRA- PRACTICES STRUCTURE THE RIGHTS AND WORKFLOW LICENSES OF RESEARCHERS 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Studies
    JUNE 1, 2015 Education, Research and Open Access in Denmark PASTEUR4OA PROJECT CRISTIN Jens H. Aasheim, Nina Karlstrøm Education, Research and Open Access in Denmark Education, Research and Open Access in Denmark The following is a short presentation of the education system, research and Open Access in Denmark. As regional coordinator for the Nordic region, CRIStin (Current Research Information System in Norway) was asked to write a case study of Denmark. This study is based in large on data and statistics provided by the Danish Key Node, Anne Sandfær, and the Danish Ministry of Higher Education and Science. Summary As one of the countries to focus on Open Access quite early, Denmark was off to a head start. E.g. the Danish government appointed an Open Access Committee to recommend steps on how to implement the transition to Open Access. But progress has been time-consuming. However, several of the suggested recommendations have already been, or are now being implemented. National policies, joint policies for the Danish Research Councils and tools for monitoring Open Access output are some examples. The main focus of the Danish Open Access effort has been directed towards repositories, depositing and the so called green route. The research and scholarly communication system of the country Denmark has a population of 5.6 million, 7.5% of which have a university/college level education of five years or more. There has been a steady increase in output of the Danish research education programs, from over 1200 finished PhDs in 2009 to over 1600 in 2012. These graduate from one of the 8 universities, 7 university colleges or 4 university hospitals in Denmark.
    [Show full text]
  • Brussels, 20.9.2013 SWD(2013) 333 Final
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 20.9.2013 SWD(2013) 333 final 4/5 COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT National measures in support of ERA Member States of the European Union Accompanying the document REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT EUROPEAN RESEARCH AREA PROGRESS REPORT 2013 {COM(2013) 637 final} EN EN Austria ERA Priority ERA Action National Measure contributing to ERA Year Adoption How the measure contributes to ERA The Austrian Research, Technological Development and Innovation Strategy “Becoming an Innovation Leader: Realising Potentials, Increasing Dynamics, Creating the Future" was published in March 2011. It introduces a coordinated vision and strategy across all ministries in charge of RTDI and identifies new challenges. Also in 2011 a Task Force of senior officials was put in place to coordinate activities from the strategic perspective and monitor the implementation of this strategy. Nine Introduce or enhance inter-ministerial working groups were established which competitive funding are active from 2012 on. These working groups focus on through calls for "climate change & scarce resources”, “quality of life and proposals and demographic change”, human potential, research The National Research, Technological More effective institutional infrastructures, knowledge transfer and start-ups, business Development and Innovation Strategy national assessments as the enterprise research, "internationalisation & external “Becoming an Innovation Leader: Realising 2011 research main modes of dimension"
    [Show full text]
  • Education and Academic Background Positions Honorary Administrative and Managerial Responsibilities Publications
    Bertil F. Dorch Library Director, University Library of Southern Denmark Associate Professor, Department of Physics, Chemistry and Pharmacy Postal address: Campusvej 55 DK-5230 Odense M Email: [email protected] Phone: 65502683 Education and academic background 1998 Ph.d.in Physics, University of Copenhagen 1995 Master's degree in Astronomy, University of Copenhagen 1993 Bachelor of Physics, University of Copenhagen Positions 2020- Associate Professor, Department of Physics, Chemistry and Pharmacy 2013- Head of Library, University Library of Southern Denmark 2012-2013 Senior Executive Adviser to the University Librarian, The Royal Library 2009-2012 Head of Center, Center for Scholarly Communication, The Royal Library 2008-2009 Head of Section, Faculty Library of Natural and Medicine, The Royal Library 2006-2011 Honorary associate professor, The Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen 2006-2008 Senior researcher, The Royal Library 2005-2007 Research Librarian, The Royal Library, Denmark 2003-2005 Steno Ass. Professor, The Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen 1999-2002 Postdoc, Institute for Solar Physics, The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences Honorary administrative and managerial responsibilities 2014-2020 President of Danish Research Library Association 2015-2016 Chairman of the Danish Library Directors' Conference 2014-2017 Member of Board at SPARC Europe Publications The Observatory Library at Østervold in Copenhagen, Denmark, 1861-1996 Dorch, B. F. & Petersen, J. O., 6. Aug 2021, (Submitted) In: Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage. 15 p. Serious play - Building a library strategy with Lego Wien, C. & Dorch, B. F., 26. May 2021, Proceedings of QQML 2021. The Para-Academic Industry and the Mayhem of Metrics Wien, C.
    [Show full text]
  • SEP-210148861 Proposal Acronym: Openaire2020
    European Commission - Research - Participants Proposal Submission Forms Horizon 2020 Call: H2020-EINFRA-2014-1 Topic: EINFRA-2-2014 Type of action: RIA Proposal number: SEP-210148861 Proposal acronym: OpenAIRE2020 Table of contents Section Title Action 1 General information 2 Participants & contacts 3 Budget 4 Ethics 5 Call-specific questions How to fill in the forms The administrative forms must be filled in for each proposal using the templates available in the submission system. Some data fields in the administrative forms are pre-filled based on the previous steps in the submission wizard. H2020-CP.pdf - Ver1.83 20140410 Page 1 of 162 Last saved 16/04/2014 at 04:04 European Commission - Research - Participants Proposal Submission Forms Proposal ID 643410 Acronym OpenAIRE2020 1 - General information Topic EINFRA-2-2014 Type of action RIA Call identifier H2020-EINFRA-2014-1 Acronym OpenAIRE2020 Proposal title* Open Access Infrastructure for Research in Europe 2020 Note that for technical reasons, the following characters are not accepted in the Proposal Title and will be removed: < > " & Duration in months 42 Fixed keyword 1 Open access Add Open Access Infrastructure, Research Information System, Monitoring Open Access Scientific Free keywords Outcomes, Gold Open Access Pilot Abstract OpenAIRE2020 represents a pivotal phase in the long-term effort to implement and strengthen the impact of the Open Access (OA) policies of the European Commission (EC), building on the achievements of the OpenAIRE projects. OpenAIRE2020 will expand and leverage its focus from (1) the agents and resources of scholarly communication to workflows and processes, (2) from publications to data, software, and other research outputs, and the links between them, and (3) strengthen the relationship of European OA infrastructures with other regions of the world, in particular Latin America and the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Open Access in Practice – Results and Recommendations from the Danish Project (2017-2018)
    Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: May 04, 2019 Green Open Access in Practice – results and recommendations from the Danish project (2017-2018) Sand, Ane Ahrenkiel; Schneider, Anette Wergeland Publication date: 2019 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link back to DTU Orbit Citation (APA): Sand, A. A. (Author), & Schneider, A. W. (Author). (2019). Green Open Access in Practice – results and recommendations from the Danish project (2017-2018). Sound/Visual production (digital), Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark: Technical University of Denmark. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. GREEN OPEN ACCESS IN PRACTICE – results and recommendations from the Danish project (2017-2018) ANE AHRENKIEL SAND and ANETTE WERGELAND SCHNEIDER EMBARGO UKSG 42nd Annual Conference and Exhibition: Telford, UK PERMITTED ADDITIONAL OPEN ACCESS ISSUES DATE: April 08 2019–April 10 2019 VERSIONS SYSTEM PUBLISHER INFRA- PRACTICES STRUCTURE THE RIGHTS AND WORKFLOW LICENSES OF RESEARCHERS 10.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comprehensive Analysis of Publications by Finnish Researchers
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Open access at the national level: A comprehensive analysis of publications by Finnish researchers Janne Pölönen1 , Mikael Laakso2 , Raf Guns3 , Emanuel Kulczycki4 , and Gunnar Sivertsen5 an open access journal 1Federation of Finnish Learned Societies, Snellmaninkatu 13, 00170 Helsinki (Finland) 2Hanken School of Economics, Information Systems Science, Arkadiankatu 22, 00100, Helsinki (Finland) 3University of Antwerp, Faculty of Social Sciences, Centre for R&D Monitoring (ECOOM), Middelheimlaan 1, 2020 Antwerp (Belgium) 4Adam Mickiewicz University, Scholarly Communication Research Group, Szamarzewskiego 89c, 60-568 Poznan (Poland) 5Nordic Institute for Studies in Innovation, Research and Education (NIFU), P.O. Box 2815,0608 Tøyen, Oslo (Norway) Citation: Pölönen, J., Laakso, M., Guns, R., Kulczycki, E., & Sivertsen, G. (2020). Keywords: bibliographic data, bibliometrics, data quality, open access, scholarly communication, Open access at the national level: A comprehensive analysis of science policy publications by Finnish researchers. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(4), 1396–1428. https://doi.org/10.1162 /qss_a_00084 ABSTRACT DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00084 Open access (OA) has mostly been studied by relying on publication data from selective international databases, notably Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus. The aim of our study is to Received: 25 October 2019 Accepted: 02 August 2020 show that it is possible to achieve a national estimate of the number and share of OA based on institutional publication data providing a comprehensive coverage of the peer-reviewed Corresponding Author: Janne Pölönen outputs across fields, publication types, and languages. Our data consists of 48,177 journal, [email protected] conference, and book publications from 14 Finnish universities in 2016–2017, including Handling Editor: information about OA status, as self-reported by researchers and validated by data-collection Ludo Waltman personnel through their Current Research Information System (CRIS).
    [Show full text]
  • Does Openness and Open Access Policy Relate to the Success of Universities?
    Information Services & Use 33 (2013) 87–91 87 DOI 10.3233/ISU-130707 IOS Press Extended abstract Does openness and open access policy relate to the success of universities? Pekka Olsbo Jyväskylä University Library, Jyväskylä, Finland E-mail: pekka.olsbo@jyu.fi Abstract. This study takes a closer look at the Ranking Web of Universities and Ranking Web of Repositories rankings and tries to examine if there is a connection between these two rankings. Study is done by analyzing the success of University of Jyväskylä and the institutional repository JyX of the University in these rankings. Comparison shows that the JyX archive plays an important role in University’s success especially when analyzing the presence and openness of the University. By analyzing the success of eight European countries in these rankings and cross reading these findings with the development of relative citation impact shown in a report by the Finnish Academy, some interesting common trends can be seen. The same three countries Finland, Denmark and Norway seem to be on their way up in all comparisons. Open Access activities in these countries can be seen as one explaining factor. Keywords: Institutional repositories, Jyx, open access, open access policy, openness, Ranking Web of Repositories, Ranking Web of Universities, University of Jyväskylä, university rankings 1. Introduction The cross reading and examination of the report The state of scientific research in Finland 2012 by The Finnish Academy and Ranking Web of Universities seem to show that there could be a connection be- tween the internet visibility, ranking and the relative citation impact of universities in different countries.
    [Show full text]
  • How Can Libraries Help Keep Open Science Infrastructure Free and Independent? HOST
    How can libraries help keep Open Science infrastructure free and independent? HOST Paul Johnson Director of Library and Learning Services University of Surrey Member of LIBER Open Access Working Group LIBER representative for the SCOSS Advisory Board https://libereurope.eu/working-group/open-access-working- group/ libereurope.eu CC BY WELCOME ADDRESS Dr Giannis Tsakonas Director, Library & Information Center, University of Patras LIBER’s Executive Board member Head of the LIBER’s Innovative Scholarly Communication Steering Committee libereurope.eu CC BY SPEAKERS Vanessa Proudman Silvio Peroni SCOSS Executive Group Chair and Director of OpenCitations Director, SPARC Europe [opencitations.net] libereurope.eu CC BY SPEAKERS Niels Stern Kevin Stranack Director, OAPEN Foundation and Membership Development & Directory of Open Access Books Community Education Coordinator, [doabooks.org] Public Knowledge Project libereurope.eu CC BY PANELISTS Liam Earney Executive Agnès Ponsati Director, Digital Resources, Director, Unit of Information Jisc (UK) Resources for Research, The Spanish National Research Council, CSIC (Spain) libereurope.eu CC BY PANELISTS Arja Tuuliniemi Jean-Francois Lutz Head of licensing / Head of the Digital Library, FinELib, National University of Lorraine, Member Library of Finland of Couperin, and the National (Finland) Open Science Committee (France) libereurope.eu CC BY NOTES ￮ The webinar is being recorded. All participants will receive a link to the recording shortly. ￮ Slides are on Zenodo: See the chat box for the link. ￮ Questions? Put them in the chat box. We’ll put questions to the speakers and panelists during the panel discussion. libereurope.eu CC BY THANKS! Questions? Please put them in the chat box. Slides and a recording will be sent to all registered delegates.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Infrastructure Matters Supporting Scholar-Led and Community- Driven Services to Advance Open Access
    Open Infrastructure Matters Supporting Scholar-Led and Community- Driven Services to Advance Open Access Iryna Kuchma, EIFL Eelco Ferwerda, OAPEN Silvio Peroni, OpenCitations Kevin Stranack, Public Knowledge Project This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Global Sustainability Coalition for Open Science Services A tried and tested solution to support OS infrastructure in need of immediate funding https://scoss.org @scossfunding Challenge: OA & OS infrastructure has Aim: Helping sustain the infrastructure to grown in number and usage and may no support the implementation of OS longer be sustainable providing no pathway forward for continuation and Officially formed in early 2017, SCOSS’s further development. purpose is to provide a new co-ordinated Risk: Services risk stagnation, downsizing cost-sharing framework that will ultimately or pay walling. enable the broader OA and OS community to support the non-commercial services on which it depends SCOSS Members https://scoss.org/what-is-scoss/who-is-behind-scoss https://scoss.org/what-is-scoss/governance How SCOSS works Assesses OS infrastructure Advocates for crowd funding to sustain OS https://scoss.org/how-it-works PLEDGES to date Total pledged Round 1: 2 030 200 euros Total pledged 101% of target 2 781 525 euros reached By 258 institutions 42% of target From 19 countries Total pledged Round 2: 751 325 euros 6 infrastructures https://scoss.org/how-it-works/current-funding-calls Current funding cycle & Pledged to date € 278 975 https://www.doabooks.org/
    [Show full text]
  • Society Publishers Accelerating Open Access and Plan S - Final Project Report
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc. Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln 9-2019 Society Publishers Accelerating Open Access and Plan S - Final Project Report Alicia Wise Information Power Ltd Lorraine Estelle Information Power Ltd Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/scholcom Part of the Intellectual Property Law Commons, Scholarly Communication Commons, and the Scholarly Publishing Commons Wise, Alicia and Estelle, Lorraine, "Society Publishers Accelerating Open Access and Plan S - Final Project Report" (2019). Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc.. 124. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/scholcom/124 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc. by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Society Publishers Accelerating Open Access and Plan S (SPA OPS) Final Project Report Alicia Wise and Lorraine Estelle, Information Power Ltd Abstract Wellcome, UKRI, and the Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers (ALPSP) commissioned Information Power Ltd to undertake a project to support society publishers to accelerate their transition to Open Access (OA) in alignment with Plan S and the wider move to accelerate immediate OA. This project is part of a range of activity that cOAlition S partners are taking forward to support the implementation of Plan S principles. 27 business models and strategies that can be deployed by publish- ers to transition successfully to OA were published. We surveyed society publishers about their experience of and interest in these models, and found that transformative agreements – including models such as Subscribe to Open – emerged as the most prom- ising because they offer a predictable, steady funding stream.
    [Show full text]