Danish Open Access Network (Doan)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Magnov2004reformat For
Upcoming Events TABLE TENNIS INFO March 24-28 NZ Veteran Championships Whangarei April 20-21 Summer Nationals—Teams North Harbour Issue: 25 November 2004 22-24 Summer Nationals—Individuals North Harbour April 29-6 May World Championships Shanghai China May 7-8 Marlborough Open Blenheim June 4-5 North Harbour Open North Harbour 18 Hawkes Bay Open Napier July 8-10 North Island Open Auckland © August 13-14 Northland Open Whangarei August to be advised South Island Open Timaru September 28-29 NZ Schools Championships Christchurch 30-8 Oct NZ Open Championships Christchurch Change in Direction for IT Strategy National Coaches lack time to continue Table Tennis WORLD RANKINGS appreciates Lots from Around the Country Five top rated players in NZ (as at 1st November 2004) the support Racketlon????? given by: Women Men Li Chunli 51 Karen Li 133 Peter Jackson 278 Anna Lee 360 Aaron Li 281 Open Mixed Doubles Final Sabine Westenra 502 Shane Laugesen 426 Jiang Yang 574 Andrew Hubbard 432 New Zealand Championships --- Auckland Brad Chen 645 World Rankings by country at: http://www.ittf.com Published by TABLE TENNIS New Zealand Inc. Phone (04) 9162459 Fax (04) 4712152 P O Box 867 Level 5, Compudigm House 49 Boulcott St, Wellington E-mail - [email protected] World Wide Web - http://www.tabletennis.org.nz Photo courtesy: Terry Cockfield Produced by: Articles, letters and advertising Robin Radford Ph 04-232 5672 published herein do not necessarily 16 St Edmund Cres Tawa Fax 04-232 9172 L/R: Shane Laugesen (Auck) & Karen Li (Nth Hb), Wellington E-Mail [email protected] reflect the views of Table Tennis Anna Lee (Canty) & Seo Dong Chul (Korea). -
COUNCIL of the EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 20 September 2013 (OR. En) 13812/13 ADD 4 RECH 410 COMPET 663 MI 779 TELECOM 238 COVER N
COUNCIL OF Brussels, 20 September 2013 THE EUROPEAN UNION (OR. en) 13812/13 ADD 4 RECH 410 COMPET 663 MI 779 TELECOM 238 COVER NOTE From: Secretary-General of the European Commission, signed by Mr Jordi AYET PUIGARNAU, Director date of receipt: 20 September 2013 To: Mr Uwe CORSEPIUS, Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union No. Cion doc.: SWD(2013) 333 final 4/5 Subject: COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT National measures in support of ERA Member States of the European Union Accompanying the document REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT EUROPEAN RESEARCH AREA PROGRESS REPORT 2013 Delegations will find attached document SWD(2013) 333 final 4/5 . Encl.: SWD(2013) 333 final 4/5 13812/13 ADD 4 AFG/nj DG G III EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 20.9.2013 SWD(2013) 333 final 4/5 COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT National measures in support of ERA Member States of the European Union Accompanying the document REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT EUROPEAN RESEARCH AREA PROGRESS REPORT 2013 {COM(2013) 637 final} EN EN Austria ERA Priority ERA Action National Measure contributing to ERA Year Adoption How the measure contributes to ERA The Austrian Research, Technological Development and Innovation Strategy “Becoming an Innovation Leader: Realising Potentials, Increasing Dynamics, Creating the Future" was published in March 2011. It introduces a coordinated vision and strategy across all ministries in charge of RTDI and identifies new challenges. Also in 2011 a Task Force of senior officials was put in place to coordinate activities from the strategic perspective and monitor the implementation of this strategy. -
Judo Finnish Open 10Th-11Th 2007 Vantaa Finland Men 60 Kg 1. Fatih
Judo Finnish Open 10th-11th 2007 Vantaa Finland Men 60 kg 1. Fatih TERIM Turkey 2. Nick KOSSOR United States 3. Scott MALONE Scotland 3. Gonzalo IBANEZ Canada 5. Juho REINVALL Finland 5. Tatu SAARINEN Finland Men 66 kg 1. Colin OATES Great Britain 2. Justin FLORES United States 3. Taylor TAKATA United States 3. James MILLAR Scotland 5. Michal POPIEL Canada 5. Joel BENOIT Canada Men 73 kg 1. Iain FEENAN Scotland 2. Michael ELDRED United States 3. Thomas IBURG Denmark 3. Alexander LUBCHENKO Russia 5. Gatis MILENBERGS Latvia 5. Nathaniel STAPLETON Great Britain Men 81 kg 1. Travis STEVENS United States 2. Aigars MILENBERGS Latvia 3. Mika TOROI Finland 3. Tyler BORAS Canada 5. Michael KAZYDUB Russia 5. Petteri LUUKKAINEN Finland Men 90 kg 1. Landry AMBOUROUE United States 2. Jerry LAMMASNIEMI Finland 3. Burhan KOCAN Turkey 3. Aleksandr MARMELJUK Estonia 5. Joakim NORLING Sweden 5. Akseli HALTTU Finland Men 100 kg 1. Martin PACEK Sweden 2. Rauli KÄRPÄNEN Finland 3. Andrew BURNS Great Britain 3. Adler VOLMAR United States 5. Villepetteri LAMMASNIEMI Finland 5. Gábor POTYI Hungary Men +100 kg 1. Thormodur JONSSON Iceland 2. Nodar METREVELI Georgia 3. Christoffer JOHANSSON Sweden 3. Anthony TURNER United States 5. Mustafa AKPINAR Turkey 5. Joe DELAHAY Great Britain Women 48 kg 1. Sayaka MATSUMOTO United States 2. Ann SHIRAISHI United States 3. Oiana BLANCO ETXEBERRIA Spain 3. Jeannette RODRIGUEZ United States 5. Bianca OCKEDAHL Canada 5. Kaisu REDSVEN Finland Women 52 kg 1. Kubra TEKNECI Turkey 2. Sanna ASKELÖF Sweden 3. Anni IKÄLÄ Finland 3. Tiia SUO-YRJÖ Finland 5. -
Green Open Access in Practice – Results and Recommendations from the Danish Project (2017-2018)
Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Sep 26, 2021 Green Open Access in Practice – results and recommendations from the Danish project (2017-2018) Sand, Ane Ahrenkiel; Schneider, Anette Wergeland Publication date: 2019 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link back to DTU Orbit Citation (APA): Sand, A. A. (Author), & Schneider, A. W. (Author). (2019). Green Open Access in Practice – results and recommendations from the Danish project (2017-2018). Sound/Visual production (digital), Technical University of Denmark. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. GREEN OPEN ACCESS IN PRACTICE – results and recommendations from the Danish project (2017-2018) ANE AHRENKIEL SAND and ANETTE WERGELAND SCHNEIDER EMBARGO UKSG 42nd Annual Conference and Exhibition: Telford, UK PERMITTED ADDITIONAL OPEN ACCESS ISSUES DATE: April 08 2019–April 10 2019 VERSIONS SYSTEM PUBLISHER INFRA- PRACTICES STRUCTURE THE RIGHTS AND WORKFLOW LICENSES OF RESEARCHERS 10. -
Case Studies
JUNE 1, 2015 Education, Research and Open Access in Denmark PASTEUR4OA PROJECT CRISTIN Jens H. Aasheim, Nina Karlstrøm Education, Research and Open Access in Denmark Education, Research and Open Access in Denmark The following is a short presentation of the education system, research and Open Access in Denmark. As regional coordinator for the Nordic region, CRIStin (Current Research Information System in Norway) was asked to write a case study of Denmark. This study is based in large on data and statistics provided by the Danish Key Node, Anne Sandfær, and the Danish Ministry of Higher Education and Science. Summary As one of the countries to focus on Open Access quite early, Denmark was off to a head start. E.g. the Danish government appointed an Open Access Committee to recommend steps on how to implement the transition to Open Access. But progress has been time-consuming. However, several of the suggested recommendations have already been, or are now being implemented. National policies, joint policies for the Danish Research Councils and tools for monitoring Open Access output are some examples. The main focus of the Danish Open Access effort has been directed towards repositories, depositing and the so called green route. The research and scholarly communication system of the country Denmark has a population of 5.6 million, 7.5% of which have a university/college level education of five years or more. There has been a steady increase in output of the Danish research education programs, from over 1200 finished PhDs in 2009 to over 1600 in 2012. These graduate from one of the 8 universities, 7 university colleges or 4 university hospitals in Denmark. -
EUROPEAN RESEARCH AREA Progress Report 2018
EUROPEAN RESEARCH AREA Progress Report 2018 Country Profile DENMARK EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Research and Innovation Directorate A — Policy Development and Coordination Unit A2 — Research and Innovation Strategy Contact: Arie Van Der Zwan E-mail: [email protected] [email protected] European Commission B-1049 Brussels EUROPE DIRECT is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) The information given is free, as are most calls (though some operators, phone boxes or hotels may charge you) LEGAL NOTICE Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use which might be made of the following information. The views expressed in this publication are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Commission. More information on the European Union is available on the internet (http://europa.eu). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2019. PDF ISBN 978-92-79-99765-5 doi:10.2777/022506 KI-02-19-109-EN-N © European Union, 2019. Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Country profile: Denmark COUNTRY SNAPSHOT Indicator Performance Progress since ERA monitoring 2016 Reference Lead/Gap Reference Lead/Gap Trend Name Score Cluster EU-28 CAGR EU-28 year (Δ %) Period (Δ % pt) (2007-18) Adjusted Research Excellence Indicator (AREI) 2016 78.6 1 75 45.0 2013-16 7.1% 3.9 3.2% GBARD as share of -
Brussels, 20.9.2013 SWD(2013) 333 Final
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 20.9.2013 SWD(2013) 333 final 4/5 COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT National measures in support of ERA Member States of the European Union Accompanying the document REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT EUROPEAN RESEARCH AREA PROGRESS REPORT 2013 {COM(2013) 637 final} EN EN Austria ERA Priority ERA Action National Measure contributing to ERA Year Adoption How the measure contributes to ERA The Austrian Research, Technological Development and Innovation Strategy “Becoming an Innovation Leader: Realising Potentials, Increasing Dynamics, Creating the Future" was published in March 2011. It introduces a coordinated vision and strategy across all ministries in charge of RTDI and identifies new challenges. Also in 2011 a Task Force of senior officials was put in place to coordinate activities from the strategic perspective and monitor the implementation of this strategy. Nine Introduce or enhance inter-ministerial working groups were established which competitive funding are active from 2012 on. These working groups focus on through calls for "climate change & scarce resources”, “quality of life and proposals and demographic change”, human potential, research The National Research, Technological More effective institutional infrastructures, knowledge transfer and start-ups, business Development and Innovation Strategy national assessments as the enterprise research, "internationalisation & external “Becoming an Innovation Leader: Realising 2011 research main modes of dimension" -
Judo Finnish Open 8.-9. November 2003 Vantaa Finland Judo Finnish Open 8.-9
Judo Finnish Open 8.-9. November 2003 Vantaa Finland Judo Finnish Open 8.-9. November 2003 Vantaa Finland EJU B-Tournament Results 2002 Results Contest sheets and statistics available here Men under 60 kg Women under 48 kg 1. Roland STEGMÜLLER Austria 1. Fiona ROBERTSON Great Britain 2. Andrei GODOVNIKOV Russia 2. Isabel LATULIPPE Canada 3. Frazer WILL Canada 3. Satu PIETARSAARI Finland 3. Valtteri JOKINEN Finland 3. Brigitte THIBAULT Canada 5. Roman RAKHMENKULOV Russia 5. Pontus HJERM Sweden Women under 52 kg 1. Jaana SUNDBERG Finland Men under 66 kg 2. Sanna ASKELÖF Sweden 1. Arten PYKHTIN Russia 3. Esther DURTSCHI Germany 2. Manuel MÜLLER Germany 3. Carolina JOHANSSON Sweden 3. Denis KOZLOV Latvia 5. Laurie WILTSHIRE Canada 3. Aarne PITKÄNEN Finland 5. Satu HUIKURI Finland 5. Gareth CARDER Great Britain 5. Ivan CHASHCHIN Russia Women under 57 kg 1. Maria LINDBERG Sweden Men under 73 kg 2. Swenja KROSIEN Germany 1. Robert BRENDAL Germany 3. Natalia YUHAREVA Russia 2. Markus PEKKOLA Finland 3. Louise RENICKS Great Britain 3. David PAPAUX Switzerland 5. Jennie ANDREASSON Sweden 3. Radu BRESTYAN Sweden 5. Jenny NYBERG Sweden 5. Ilya NIKOLAEV Russia 5. Vladimir GRILL Estonia Women under 63 kg 1. Johanna YLINEN Finland Men under 81 kg 2. Isabelle PEARSON Canada 1. Thilo PACHMANN Switzerland 3. Esther MYREBOE Norway 2. Roland KASPER Austria 3. Jenny DAVIS Great Britain 3. Janne ROMPPANEN Finland 5. Nicole SYDBÖGE Denmark 3. Jouni RANTA Finland 5. Danielle BEATON Canada 5. Mika TOROI Finland 5. Florian RINNERTHALER Austria Women under 70 kg 1. Marie-Helene CHISHOLM Canada Men under 90 kg 2. -
Invitation – Finnish Open 2020 – Final
INVITATION to compete in FINNISH OPEN 2020 World ranking and Badminton Europe Elite Circuit International Challenge Tournament Tournament dates 2 – 5 April 2020 Entry closes on 3 March 2020 Official hotel reservation closing date 13 March 2020 ORGANISER Badminton Finland, Valimotie 10, FIN-00380 Helsinki Event coordinator - Ilkka Hellgren Phone: +358 40 526 9939 E-mail: [email protected] https://finnishopen.sulkapallo.fi/en/ REFEREES Tournament Referee: Jens Köster (Germany) - [email protected] Deputy referee: Ari Vartiainen (Finland) – [email protected] DATES Wednesday 1 April 2020 - Practice courts available 16:00-21:00 at the venue Wednesday 1 April 2020 – Team Managers meeting 19:00 at the venue Wednesday 1 April 2020 – Umpire briefing 20:00 at the venue Thursday 2 April 2020: Qualifications (if necessary) from 09.00 Friday 3 April 2020: Main tournament from 09.00 Saturday 4 April 2020: Quarter Finals from 10.00 and Semi-Finals from 16.00 Sunday 5 April 2020: Finals from 10.00 The final frame schedule shall be made at least 20 days before the start of the tournament and shall be published on the tournament’s website. The organizer will arrange the transport from and to the official hotel for Team Managers and Umpires for meetings on April the 1st. VENUE Energia Areena, Rajatorpantie 23, FIN-01600 Vantaa Phone: +358 10 633 0303 (during tournament only) There will be free transportation between the official tournament hotel and the tournament venue for those who stay in the official hotel. CONDITIONS The Finnish Open will be conducted under the BWF General Competition Regulations and in accordance with the Badminton Europe Elite Circuit Regulations, of which the Finnish Open forms a part. -
Education and Academic Background Positions Honorary Administrative and Managerial Responsibilities Publications
Bertil F. Dorch Library Director, University Library of Southern Denmark Associate Professor, Department of Physics, Chemistry and Pharmacy Postal address: Campusvej 55 DK-5230 Odense M Email: [email protected] Phone: 65502683 Education and academic background 1998 Ph.d.in Physics, University of Copenhagen 1995 Master's degree in Astronomy, University of Copenhagen 1993 Bachelor of Physics, University of Copenhagen Positions 2020- Associate Professor, Department of Physics, Chemistry and Pharmacy 2013- Head of Library, University Library of Southern Denmark 2012-2013 Senior Executive Adviser to the University Librarian, The Royal Library 2009-2012 Head of Center, Center for Scholarly Communication, The Royal Library 2008-2009 Head of Section, Faculty Library of Natural and Medicine, The Royal Library 2006-2011 Honorary associate professor, The Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen 2006-2008 Senior researcher, The Royal Library 2005-2007 Research Librarian, The Royal Library, Denmark 2003-2005 Steno Ass. Professor, The Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen 1999-2002 Postdoc, Institute for Solar Physics, The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences Honorary administrative and managerial responsibilities 2014-2020 President of Danish Research Library Association 2015-2016 Chairman of the Danish Library Directors' Conference 2014-2017 Member of Board at SPARC Europe Publications The Observatory Library at Østervold in Copenhagen, Denmark, 1861-1996 Dorch, B. F. & Petersen, J. O., 6. Aug 2021, (Submitted) In: Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage. 15 p. Serious play - Building a library strategy with Lego Wien, C. & Dorch, B. F., 26. May 2021, Proceedings of QQML 2021. The Para-Academic Industry and the Mayhem of Metrics Wien, C. -
189 OPEN SCIENCE Rationale and Objectives Major Aspects Recent
III.7. STI POLICY PROFILES: STRENGTHENING INTERACTIONS FOR INNOVATION OPEN SCIENCE Rationale and objectives While science has always been open – indeed openness is critical to the modern scientific enterprise – there are concerns, and some anecdotal evidence, that the processes for producing research and diffusing its results have become less open. There are several reasons. First, science is increasingly data-driven and expensive, but access to scientific data is often subject to administrative, legal and privacy regulations. Access also requires adequate information and communication technology (ICT) infrastructure. Other limits on openness in science include policies and practices at universities that place a premium on patenting over publishing and weak incentives for researchers to share data. This can also act as a barrier to the replication and validation of scientific experiments. Finally, the policies and practices of scientific publishers that limit web-based access to research results may also make access to scientific data less open. In response to these concerns, governments and the research community, including publishers, are seeking to preserve and promote more openness in research. “Open science” refers to an approach to research based on greater access to public research data, enabled by ICT tools and platforms, and broader collaboration in science, including the participation of non-scientists, and finally, the use of alternative copyright tools for diffusing research results. Open science has the potential to enhance the efficiency and quality of research by reducing the costs of data collection, by facilitating the exploitation of dormant or inaccessible data at low cost and by increasing the opportunities for collaboration in research as well as in innovation. -
Repositories Recreated – the Finch Report Versus Diva in Sweden
Information Services & Use 33 (2013) 183–189 183 DOI 10.3233/ISU-130696 IOS Press Repositories recreated – The Finch report versus DiVA in Sweden Stefan Andersson ∗ and Aina Svensson Electronic Publishing Centre, Uppsala University Library, Uppsala, Sweden Abstract. In this paper we give an overview of the development of institutional repositories in Sweden, by addressing the criticism raised in the Finch report. In contrast to how the use and development of institutional repositories in the UK is described we show the ever-increasing importance repositories take in Sweden, with DiVA as our particular example. Keywords: DiVA, Sweden, electronic publishing, digital publication, institutional repositories, research information, Open Access, the Finch report 1. Introduction Recently the technological and organizational infrastructures of institutional repositories have been questioned. The British so-called Finch report [1] from last summer argued that further development are needed in order to make them better integrated and interoperable to bring greater use by both authors and readers. Not only the technical frameworks and presumably low usage levels are criticized but also the lack of “clear policies on such matters as the content they will accept, the uses to which it may be put, and the role that they will play in preservation”. The report concludes that: “In practice patterns of deposit are patchy”. In Sweden we see a very different development of institutional repositories, compared to what is described in the Finch report. The institutional repositories today function as integrated services with many different applications and uses within a University or a research institute. The repositories are built on a thorough technical framework with high quality metadata standards, a prerequisite so that data can be used as a basis for evaluation and for allocating funds on a local basis, as well as to be re-used in other external web services.