Master's Thesis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Master's Thesis Master’s Thesis Master's Degree Programme in Business Administration, Leadership and Service Design YDESAS16 2019 Susanna Lehtojärvi TOWARDS HAPPY ADMINISTRATION AND LEADERSHIP IN A SPORTS CLUB A design thinking approach to study the member experience with the Olympic Committee’s Suomisport ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Instructor Päivi Katajamäki, Senior Lecturer, Turku University of Applied Sciences, has provided intensive support on this thesis process. Also, all my opponents in the seminars have provided valuable perspectives to improve my thesis further. Ulla Seppälä-Kaven, Senior Lecturer, Turku University of Applied Sciences has guided our student groups’ way during these years. It has been fascinating and life changing experience to study with a such diverse group of professionals from different countries, various fields of businesses and especially with a group of persons who have an amazing ability to develop services but also our mutual co-operation and even the study program itself. It has been a privilege to work at the Suomisport pilot together with Hanna Hiilamo, Account Manager and Rainer Anttila, Manager, from the Finnish Olympic Committee as well as the professionals Jarno Ojala, UX designer, PhD, and Ari Kontiainen, Project Manager, from Vincit. Humble thanks belong to the badminton community, especially to those committed board members, who have sacrificed their precious and valuable time to enable insights and profound understanding for this thesis. Discussions with Ilkka Hellgren, Event Manager, the Finnish Badminton Association, has offered reliable source of understanding the existing challenges and the future direction also in a wider context than this thesis. Warm thanks to Laura Elo, Work Life Developer, Cambiare, who has provided me valuable learnings and perspective to understand differences of the people throughout my journey in the MBA studies. I want to thank my dearly beloved family of the bottom of my heart for their support during my studies. I hope that my example strengthens the positive attitude of my children towards the lifelong learning and embracing constant changes. MASTER’S THESIS | ABSTRACT TURKU UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES Master's Degree Programme in Business Administration, Leadership and Service Design 2019 | Total number of pages 105 + Appendices 11 Susanna Lehtojärvi TOWARDS HAPPY ADMINISTRATION AND LEADERSHIP IN A SPORTS CLUB A design thinking approach to study the member experience with the Olympic Committee’s Suomisport There are nearly 500,000 volunteers in 10,000 sports clubs in Finland. The need to even the administrative workload in them is evident. Suomisport as of today has 85 sports federations and 130 sports. The aim is to develop Suomisport to support everyday sports life of one million Finns. The aim of this thesis was to study how the Finnish Olympic Committee’s Suomisport sports club service would improve the everyday sport life experience in a sports club. Furthermore, the aim was to describe which digital services a badminton clubs need to operate in today’s world with increasing demands. The leadership experience and communication challenges were also studied. A literature review established the basis for the theoretical part of this thesis. The theoretical framework was developed around design thinking elements: co-design, empathy and member experience. Moreover, the theories covered communication, leadership and change management. Secondary data was acquired through various surveys and reports. Action research and a design thinking approach of this thesis might provide insights for the Finnish Olympic Committee to develop Suomisport even more attractive to the sports clubs in Finland. Various qualitative research methods, interviews and surveys, were used. The following (service) design thinking methods were used to gather information and to gain insights: a stakeholder map, a business model canvas, a service safari, an online ethnography, cultural probes, a persona, a customer journey map and a service blueprint. SWOT analysis and benchmarking, widely known in business research were also included. The Suomisport sports club service pilot enabled the co-designing together with 15 sports clubs. As a result, the badminton club’s processes were described demonstrating opportunities to improve everyday sports life with Suomisport. The results could be used as a benchmarking example to the sports clubs throughout Finland in a comparable situation. The conclusion of this thesis was that emphasis is required to increase the sense of belonging through enabling communal dialogue in the sports club community. There is an exciting potential in the Suomisport sports club service to be developed into a leading solution to support the everyday sports life among the sportspeople. Its MyData approach provides Suomisport a unique advantage as compared to other similar services. KEYWORDS: design thinking, service design, customer experience, administration, leadership, sports club, Suomisport CONTENT LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND DEFINITIONS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Structure of the thesis 2 1.2 About the author 3 2 RESEARCH DESIGN 4 2.1 Aim 4 2.2 Frame of reference 4 2.3 Research process 5 2.4 Action research 7 2.5 Literature review 9 3 (SERVICE) DESIGN THINKING 10 3.1 Co-design 12 3.2 Empathy 13 3.3 Member experience 14 4 COMMUNICATION, LEADERSHIP AND CHANGE 21 4.1 Essential communication 21 4.2 Successful change management 24 4.3 Leadership in a non-profit sports club 27 5 THE WORLD OF SPORTS CLUBS 33 5.1 Operational model of the sports club 34 5.2 Stakeholder map 36 6 OLYMPIC COMMITTEE’S SUOMISPORT 40 6.1 The Suomisport roadmap 42 6.2 The Suomisport sports club service 44 7 BADMINTON CLUB EN ROUTE TO CHANGE 46 7.1 Snapshot of the badminton club 47 7.2 Satisfaction in the badminton club 48 7.3 Digital services at the badminton club 50 7.4 Digital service alternatives for the sports club 52 7.5 The Suomisport sports club service pilot 59 7.6 A need for a dialogue among the members 61 7.7 Badminton club chairmen meeting 62 7.8 The perspective of badminton club board members 66 7.9 The Finnish Badminton Association’s need for communication 71 8 INSIGHTS 72 8.1 Personas in a sports club 73 8.2 A member journey map 78 9 IDEATION AND PROTOTYPING 81 9.1 The annual operational clock 81 9.2 Service blueprint 83 9.3 Concept with Suomisport 85 10 CONCLUSIONS 88 10.1 Digital services the badminton club needs 89 10.2 Experience of leadership in the badminton club 90 10.3 Emphasis on the communication 91 10.4 Getting started with the Suomisport sports club service 93 11 ANALYSIS 94 11.1 Assessment of the methods 94 11.2 Assessment of the action research 96 11.3 Learnings 97 11.4 Suggestions for further studies 98 SOURCES 99 APPENDICES Appendix 1. Examples of single and multisport clubs Appendix 2. The Raisio Badminton Association: Satisfaction survey questions (2018) Appendix 3. Word clouds (in Finnish) Appendix 4. Pre-task questions of the Suomisport sports club service pilot kick-off Appendix 5. Cultural probes at the Basecamp (in Finnish) Appendix 6. Online game survey questions Appendix 7. Interview questions Appendix 8. Semi-structured interview questions Appendix 9 Customer Journey Map: “Junior player's membership” Appendix 10. Annual operational clock Appendix 11. Service blueprint: “One year at the board” FIGURES Figure 1. Participation % in various sports clubs’ activities based on gender and age during the past 12 months (Official Statistics of Finland 2017, 8). 2 Figure 2. Frame of reference for the member experience in a sports club. 5 Figure 3. Design thinking “Double Diamond” process model (adapted from The Design Council 2015). 6 Figure 4. Truths versus insights (adapted from Polaine et al. 2013, 39). 10 Figure 5. The Design Squiggle (Newman 2002). 11 Figure 6. Dimensions of empathy (adapted from Zaki and Oschsner 2012 in Huotilainen and Saarikivi 2018, 235−236). 14 Figure 7. The levels of the customer experience in the value creation pyramid (adapted from Palmu Inc. in Tuulaniemi 2016, 75). 15 Figure 8. Emotional engagement connects the worlds of logic and emotions (adapted from Gobé 2009, 111). 16 Figure 9. The elements of value pyramid (Almquist et al. 2016). 18 Figure 10. Say-do-make model for experience design (Sanders and Dandavate 1999 in Koskinen 2003, 60). 19 Figure 11. The organisational culture pyramid (adapted from Keyton 2011, 176−179). 22 Figure 12. Change needs five critical elements to succeed (adapted from Valpola 2004 in Elo’s presentation 8.3.2019). 26 Figure 13. Cross-Cultural Leadership Intelligence (XLQ) Model (Grisham 2006, 254). 29 Figure 14. 80+1 jobs of the sportspeople at sports clubs (adapted from Saapunki and Hiilamo 2018). 33 Figure 15. Terminology and relationships (adapted from Anttila and Kontiainen 2019). 34 Figure 16. Operational model of a sports club (adapted from Olympiakomitea 2019a). 35 Figure 17. Stakeholder map from the Raisio Badminton Associations’ perspective. 37 Figure 18. Sports club activities and Suomisport in the framework of the Finnish Olympic Committee (adapted from Suomen Olympiakomitea 2018, 8). 40 Figure 19. Digitalisation enables efficient communication in sports clubs (Suomen Olympiakomitea 2017). 42 Figure 20. Suomisport roadmap 2017−2020 (adapted from the Finnish Olympic Committee 2019, 5). 43 Figure 21. MyData (adapted from Poikola et al. 2018, 18). 43 Figure 22. Suomisport sports club service is a tool to support everyday sports life (adapted from Anttila and Kontiainen 2019). 44 Figure 23. The business model canvas for the Raisio Badminton Association (template from Strategyzer 2018, 46). 48 Figure 24. Example of the Net Promoter Score question. 50 Figure 25. NPS of the Raisio Badminton Association in autumn 2018. 50 Figure 26. Badminton clubs using MyClub (MyClub 2019). 55 Figure 27. An online ethnography indicated the need for two-way communication (RaSu’s Nimenhuuto 15.4.2019). 62 Figure 28. Question regarding the status of the member register divided the clubs.
Recommended publications
  • Magnov2004reformat For
    Upcoming Events TABLE TENNIS INFO March 24-28 NZ Veteran Championships Whangarei April 20-21 Summer Nationals—Teams North Harbour Issue: 25 November 2004 22-24 Summer Nationals—Individuals North Harbour April 29-6 May World Championships Shanghai China May 7-8 Marlborough Open Blenheim June 4-5 North Harbour Open North Harbour 18 Hawkes Bay Open Napier July 8-10 North Island Open Auckland © August 13-14 Northland Open Whangarei August to be advised South Island Open Timaru September 28-29 NZ Schools Championships Christchurch 30-8 Oct NZ Open Championships Christchurch Change in Direction for IT Strategy National Coaches lack time to continue Table Tennis WORLD RANKINGS appreciates Lots from Around the Country Five top rated players in NZ (as at 1st November 2004) the support Racketlon????? given by: Women Men Li Chunli 51 Karen Li 133 Peter Jackson 278 Anna Lee 360 Aaron Li 281 Open Mixed Doubles Final Sabine Westenra 502 Shane Laugesen 426 Jiang Yang 574 Andrew Hubbard 432 New Zealand Championships --- Auckland Brad Chen 645 World Rankings by country at: http://www.ittf.com Published by TABLE TENNIS New Zealand Inc. Phone (04) 9162459 Fax (04) 4712152 P O Box 867 Level 5, Compudigm House 49 Boulcott St, Wellington E-mail - [email protected] World Wide Web - http://www.tabletennis.org.nz Photo courtesy: Terry Cockfield Produced by: Articles, letters and advertising Robin Radford Ph 04-232 5672 published herein do not necessarily 16 St Edmund Cres Tawa Fax 04-232 9172 L/R: Shane Laugesen (Auck) & Karen Li (Nth Hb), Wellington E-Mail [email protected] reflect the views of Table Tennis Anna Lee (Canty) & Seo Dong Chul (Korea).
    [Show full text]
  • Judo Finnish Open 10Th-11Th 2007 Vantaa Finland Men 60 Kg 1. Fatih
    Judo Finnish Open 10th-11th 2007 Vantaa Finland Men 60 kg 1. Fatih TERIM Turkey 2. Nick KOSSOR United States 3. Scott MALONE Scotland 3. Gonzalo IBANEZ Canada 5. Juho REINVALL Finland 5. Tatu SAARINEN Finland Men 66 kg 1. Colin OATES Great Britain 2. Justin FLORES United States 3. Taylor TAKATA United States 3. James MILLAR Scotland 5. Michal POPIEL Canada 5. Joel BENOIT Canada Men 73 kg 1. Iain FEENAN Scotland 2. Michael ELDRED United States 3. Thomas IBURG Denmark 3. Alexander LUBCHENKO Russia 5. Gatis MILENBERGS Latvia 5. Nathaniel STAPLETON Great Britain Men 81 kg 1. Travis STEVENS United States 2. Aigars MILENBERGS Latvia 3. Mika TOROI Finland 3. Tyler BORAS Canada 5. Michael KAZYDUB Russia 5. Petteri LUUKKAINEN Finland Men 90 kg 1. Landry AMBOUROUE United States 2. Jerry LAMMASNIEMI Finland 3. Burhan KOCAN Turkey 3. Aleksandr MARMELJUK Estonia 5. Joakim NORLING Sweden 5. Akseli HALTTU Finland Men 100 kg 1. Martin PACEK Sweden 2. Rauli KÄRPÄNEN Finland 3. Andrew BURNS Great Britain 3. Adler VOLMAR United States 5. Villepetteri LAMMASNIEMI Finland 5. Gábor POTYI Hungary Men +100 kg 1. Thormodur JONSSON Iceland 2. Nodar METREVELI Georgia 3. Christoffer JOHANSSON Sweden 3. Anthony TURNER United States 5. Mustafa AKPINAR Turkey 5. Joe DELAHAY Great Britain Women 48 kg 1. Sayaka MATSUMOTO United States 2. Ann SHIRAISHI United States 3. Oiana BLANCO ETXEBERRIA Spain 3. Jeannette RODRIGUEZ United States 5. Bianca OCKEDAHL Canada 5. Kaisu REDSVEN Finland Women 52 kg 1. Kubra TEKNECI Turkey 2. Sanna ASKELÖF Sweden 3. Anni IKÄLÄ Finland 3. Tiia SUO-YRJÖ Finland 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Judo Finnish Open 8.-9. November 2003 Vantaa Finland Judo Finnish Open 8.-9
    Judo Finnish Open 8.-9. November 2003 Vantaa Finland Judo Finnish Open 8.-9. November 2003 Vantaa Finland EJU B-Tournament Results 2002 Results Contest sheets and statistics available here Men under 60 kg Women under 48 kg 1. Roland STEGMÜLLER Austria 1. Fiona ROBERTSON Great Britain 2. Andrei GODOVNIKOV Russia 2. Isabel LATULIPPE Canada 3. Frazer WILL Canada 3. Satu PIETARSAARI Finland 3. Valtteri JOKINEN Finland 3. Brigitte THIBAULT Canada 5. Roman RAKHMENKULOV Russia 5. Pontus HJERM Sweden Women under 52 kg 1. Jaana SUNDBERG Finland Men under 66 kg 2. Sanna ASKELÖF Sweden 1. Arten PYKHTIN Russia 3. Esther DURTSCHI Germany 2. Manuel MÜLLER Germany 3. Carolina JOHANSSON Sweden 3. Denis KOZLOV Latvia 5. Laurie WILTSHIRE Canada 3. Aarne PITKÄNEN Finland 5. Satu HUIKURI Finland 5. Gareth CARDER Great Britain 5. Ivan CHASHCHIN Russia Women under 57 kg 1. Maria LINDBERG Sweden Men under 73 kg 2. Swenja KROSIEN Germany 1. Robert BRENDAL Germany 3. Natalia YUHAREVA Russia 2. Markus PEKKOLA Finland 3. Louise RENICKS Great Britain 3. David PAPAUX Switzerland 5. Jennie ANDREASSON Sweden 3. Radu BRESTYAN Sweden 5. Jenny NYBERG Sweden 5. Ilya NIKOLAEV Russia 5. Vladimir GRILL Estonia Women under 63 kg 1. Johanna YLINEN Finland Men under 81 kg 2. Isabelle PEARSON Canada 1. Thilo PACHMANN Switzerland 3. Esther MYREBOE Norway 2. Roland KASPER Austria 3. Jenny DAVIS Great Britain 3. Janne ROMPPANEN Finland 5. Nicole SYDBÖGE Denmark 3. Jouni RANTA Finland 5. Danielle BEATON Canada 5. Mika TOROI Finland 5. Florian RINNERTHALER Austria Women under 70 kg 1. Marie-Helene CHISHOLM Canada Men under 90 kg 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Invitation – Finnish Open 2020 – Final
    INVITATION to compete in FINNISH OPEN 2020 World ranking and Badminton Europe Elite Circuit International Challenge Tournament Tournament dates 2 – 5 April 2020 Entry closes on 3 March 2020 Official hotel reservation closing date 13 March 2020 ORGANISER Badminton Finland, Valimotie 10, FIN-00380 Helsinki Event coordinator - Ilkka Hellgren Phone: +358 40 526 9939 E-mail: [email protected] https://finnishopen.sulkapallo.fi/en/ REFEREES Tournament Referee: Jens Köster (Germany) - [email protected] Deputy referee: Ari Vartiainen (Finland) – [email protected] DATES Wednesday 1 April 2020 - Practice courts available 16:00-21:00 at the venue Wednesday 1 April 2020 – Team Managers meeting 19:00 at the venue Wednesday 1 April 2020 – Umpire briefing 20:00 at the venue Thursday 2 April 2020: Qualifications (if necessary) from 09.00 Friday 3 April 2020: Main tournament from 09.00 Saturday 4 April 2020: Quarter Finals from 10.00 and Semi-Finals from 16.00 Sunday 5 April 2020: Finals from 10.00 The final frame schedule shall be made at least 20 days before the start of the tournament and shall be published on the tournament’s website. The organizer will arrange the transport from and to the official hotel for Team Managers and Umpires for meetings on April the 1st. VENUE Energia Areena, Rajatorpantie 23, FIN-01600 Vantaa Phone: +358 10 633 0303 (during tournament only) There will be free transportation between the official tournament hotel and the tournament venue for those who stay in the official hotel. CONDITIONS The Finnish Open will be conducted under the BWF General Competition Regulations and in accordance with the Badminton Europe Elite Circuit Regulations, of which the Finnish Open forms a part.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comprehensive Analysis of Publications by Finnish Researchers
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Open access at the national level: A comprehensive analysis of publications by Finnish researchers Janne Pölönen1 , Mikael Laakso2 , Raf Guns3 , Emanuel Kulczycki4 , and Gunnar Sivertsen5 an open access journal 1Federation of Finnish Learned Societies, Snellmaninkatu 13, 00170 Helsinki (Finland) 2Hanken School of Economics, Information Systems Science, Arkadiankatu 22, 00100, Helsinki (Finland) 3University of Antwerp, Faculty of Social Sciences, Centre for R&D Monitoring (ECOOM), Middelheimlaan 1, 2020 Antwerp (Belgium) 4Adam Mickiewicz University, Scholarly Communication Research Group, Szamarzewskiego 89c, 60-568 Poznan (Poland) 5Nordic Institute for Studies in Innovation, Research and Education (NIFU), P.O. Box 2815,0608 Tøyen, Oslo (Norway) Citation: Pölönen, J., Laakso, M., Guns, R., Kulczycki, E., & Sivertsen, G. (2020). Keywords: bibliographic data, bibliometrics, data quality, open access, scholarly communication, Open access at the national level: A comprehensive analysis of science policy publications by Finnish researchers. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(4), 1396–1428. https://doi.org/10.1162 /qss_a_00084 ABSTRACT DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00084 Open access (OA) has mostly been studied by relying on publication data from selective international databases, notably Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus. The aim of our study is to Received: 25 October 2019 Accepted: 02 August 2020 show that it is possible to achieve a national estimate of the number and share of OA based on institutional publication data providing a comprehensive coverage of the peer-reviewed Corresponding Author: Janne Pölönen outputs across fields, publication types, and languages. Our data consists of 48,177 journal, [email protected] conference, and book publications from 14 Finnish universities in 2016–2017, including Handling Editor: information about OA status, as self-reported by researchers and validated by data-collection Ludo Waltman personnel through their Current Research Information System (CRIS).
    [Show full text]
  • ICT Cluster Finland Review 2005
    TIEKE ven Knowledge Economy. Finland’s Technology Policy Yields Fruit. |global view| Again? |international cooperation| Finland and WSIS. ICT for Development – Can esource in Global Competition |communications| Broadband Connections and mmunications| Ever Tougher Competition on All Fronts. Finnet Group – Believes d development| Information and Communications Technologies. New Business gmas of lifelong learning in engineering education. Finnish Open Source – Flying uality. Jyväskylä – Human Technology City Known for Its User Friendly Internet the Resque of SME’s |investments in finland| Finland – Easy Going Markets and ng Center – an Innovative Landing to Japan. New Era of Building Management. gh-Technology – AirBuccaneers. In the Cross Roads of Development – from “ICT- bal Information Society. Report on Finland in the Global Economy: Competence, and.fi. Welcome to the Meeting Point for Information Society Developers ICT CLUSTER FINLAND REVIEW 2005 |editorial| Finnish Structures Favourable to Future Changes During the past decade, Finland has successfully built a dynamic Contents developing knowledge economy while maintaining the basic characteristics of the Nordic welfare model. The digitalisation has increased overall productivity in society and offered new market opportunities for digital content producers and service providers. 4 ICT – Essential Tool for the Future 6 Finland In order to secure continuity of development and competitiveness, An ICT-Driven Knowledge Economy Finland will need to be able to produce specialised products and services that are applicable to digital environment. A well recognized 10 Finland’s Technology Policy Yields unbalance still exists between manufacturing of digital products and Fruit content production. Meanwhile, the structures – economy, education, capital and even age – of the Finnish society are favourable to the 12 Finnish ICT Development changes ahead.
    [Show full text]
  • Join the World's Fastest Growing Racket Sport
    Join the world’s fastest growing Racket Sport Christoph Krenn (AUT), World No. 1 History of Racketlon • 1988 first Racket games Finnish Championships. Since then played annually in Finland • In 1989 in Swedish Championships • November 2001 the first World Championships Tournament in Gothenburg, Sweden • 2002 International Racketlon Federation was founded as an official body • FIR World Tour started in 2003 • 2005 first legal national country federations were founded • In November 2005 IRF – International Racketlon Federation legally founded • September 2006 Official name change to Fédération Internationale de Racketlon – FIR Rules of Racketlon • You play your opponent in the order Tabletennis, Badminton, Squash and Tennis • Four sets (one in each sport) first to 21 points (two points difference at 20:20) • Running score, each rally counts • Gummiarm (one single serve in Tennis) decides in Tennis if score is equal after four sets • Lots are drawn once before the match who serves in Tabletennis and Squash. Opponent serves in Badminton and Tennis • Each player serves twice in all sports before change of service • Change ends when one player has 11 points in each set • All other rules of the individual sports apply Organization of FIR • IRF founded in 2005 Gothenburg, Sweden • FIR established in Austria • FIR head office in Vienna • FIR has 37 member countries • FIR Council with 9 members from 9 countries • FIR Executive-President Marcel Weigl • Annual General Meeting with all the member countries More facts • We are a globally spread sport
    [Show full text]
  • The Success of the Finnish Model: an Economic Analysis
    Journal of Management Policies and Practices June 2019, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 12-20 ISSN: 2333-6048 (Print), 2333-6056 (Online) Copyright © The Author(s). All Rights Reserved. Published by American Research Institute for Policy Development DOI: 10.15640/jmpp.v7n1a2 URL: https://doi.org/10.15640/jmpp.v7n1a2 The Success of the Finnish Model: An Economic Analysis Jordi Franch Parella1 Abstract Finland is considered an example of how interventionist governmental policies work and a success under many socio-economic standards. From social indicators like inequality and crime to economic indicators like productivity and innovation the Nordic country gathers near the top. We inquire into the causes of the Finnish economic success, ascertaining which is the role of the Welfare State and the public sector in it. In fact, we examine which is the relation of causality between the good socio-economic performance and the public sector. Finland is a competitive market economy that has developed a functional Welfare State within a context of liberalisation and free choice. In this paper, we research the causes of this successful model. Keywords: Nordic model, Finland, capitalism, socialism, Welfare State JEL Classification: I00, O52, P00 1. Introduction Finland, the most northerly country in the European Union (EU), disposes of an inhospitable and extreme climatology. The low temperatures and the cold Baltic wind make life in public outdoor spaces unattractive. The differences with the southern European countries are very noticeable from the first moment (Franch, 2017). The Nordic economies are usually seen, not only in Europe but also in the USA (Aleem, 2015) as an example of efficient Welfare States where the government provides a large range of social benefits.
    [Show full text]
  • Finchat: Corpus and Evaluation Setup for Finnish Chat Conversations on Everyday Topics
    FinChat: Corpus and evaluation setup for Finnish chat conversations on everyday topics Katri Leino1, Juho Leinonen1, Mittul Singh1, Sami Virpioja2, Mikko Kurimo1 1Department of Signal Processing and Acoustics, Aalto University, Finland 2Department of Digital Humanities, University of Helsinki, Finland [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract evaluation setups available. Meanwhile, using machine trans- lated corpora from well-resourced languages is dependent on Creating open-domain chatbots requires large amounts of con- the translation quality which for Finnish is a concern at the mo- versational data and related benchmark tasks to evaluate them. ment. In this work, our focus is to bridge this gap for Finnish Standardized evaluation tasks are crucial for creating automatic and to bootstrap open-domain chatbot research in the language. evaluation metrics for model development; otherwise, compar- We provide the FinChat corpus and evaluation setup to support ing the models would require resource-expensive human evalu- this aim. ation. While chatbot challenges have recently managed to pro- The FinChat corpus consists of Finnish chat conversations vide a plethora of such resources for English, resources in other on everyday topics collected from voluntary participants. Our languages are not yet available. In this work, we provide a goal is to collect conversations that are natural and engaging, starting point for Finnish open-domain chatbot research. We which are two important qualities of a human conversation [4]. describe our collection efforts to create the Finnish chat conver- To ensure naturalness, we do not restrict our participants to a sation corpus FinChat, which is made available publicly.
    [Show full text]
  • This Is How the Gas Market Opened in Finland Gasgrid Finland Oy, 17 June 2020
    This is how the gas market opened in Finland Gasgrid Finland Oy, 17 June 2020 Contents . 1 The first decades of natural gas in Finland . 2 The Natural Gas Directives encouraged opening the market . 2 The Balticconnector project was born . 3 Establishing the market . 4 The establishment of Gasgrid Finland was preceded by a transitional phase 5 The market opened . 6 Customer experiences . 7 Gas market integration . 8 The way forward . 9 This is how the gas market opened in Finland The first decades of natural gas in Finland Energy use of natural gas in Finland began in January Finland: along the west coast, via southwest Finland 1974 in the middle of the first oil crisis. The price of crude to Sweden or from Norway via Sweden to Finland and oil and all petroleum products suddenly doubled or under the Gulf of Finland to Estonia. In the background, tripled. Construction of the natural gas pipeline from the there was the idea of bringing gas to Finland not only Soviet Union via Imatra to Kouvola had already begun from Russia but also from the West. The matter was also a couple of years earlier and, despite some challenges seen as a security of supply issue, and there were doubts along the way, was completed on schedule. about whether the Soviet Union or later Russia could Gas imports had a positive effect on balancing cut off gas imports to Finland for economic or political the trade between Finland and the Soviet Union and reasons. In practice, however, such a situation did not facilitated the transition of southeast Finnish industry to occur in Finland.
    [Show full text]
  • Fascinating Adventures
    Lake Saimaa Finland Lappeenranta and Imatra region NORWAY LAPPEENRANTA AND IMATRA REGION – LAKE SAIMAA FINLAND 2017 RUSSIA South SWEDEN Rovaniemi Karelia Parikkala FINLAND Rautjärvi Ruokolahti Savitaipale LAPPEENRANNAN Taipalsaari Rauha / IMATRA Oulu Joutseno Imatra border crossing Lemi LAPPEENRANTA Luumäki Nuijamaa Nuijamaa border crossing Vainikkala Kajaani Ylämaa Vainikkala border crossing (Allegro train) SEUTU IMATRAN JA Saimaa canal VYBORG Vaalimaa LAKE SAIMAA Vaalimaa border crossing Kuopio Travel visa-free from Vaasa our region to Russia 2017 SUOMI Joensuu Jyväskylä Savonlinna Fascinating Mikkeli Pori Tampere IMATRA LAPPEENRANTA Lahti adventures Vyborg Turku Vantaa Моscow Espoo & PEACEFUL NATURE IN THE LAKE SAIMAA REGION HELSINKI St. Petersburg Stockholm Tallinn THE BEST HOLIDAY TIPS – EVENTS, SIGHTS, CRUISES, SPAS, HIKING AND GOLFING The 4 seasons of Lake Saimaa – 4 distinctly different travel experiences. DEC – JAN – FEB MAR – APR – MAY Winter –35°C...10°C Spring –20°C...20°C Contrary to the popular belief, the temperature isn’t always Alright, don’t think that us Finns treat Spring like an after- freezing here in Finland. But it does get quite cold in here dur- thought, just some empty space between the icy winter and ing winter – which is great! During winter the snow and frost steamy summer. No, no, no my friend, Spring is the season we create amazing opportunities for skating, cross country skiing, appreciate the most. Why? – well the retreating ice, sparkling downhill skiing, snowshoeing, snowmobiling and winter fish- waves and budding nature are all reasons to be extra cheer- ing. Also, remember to listen to the silence of the wintertime ful. Also while we’re being boastful, Lake Saimaa is at it’s best nature, gaze at the pure white snow, build a snowman – or if during this time of the year, especially if you’re looking to do you’re feeling especially courageous, try ice swimming.
    [Show full text]
  • Tournament Player's Diary 2009 – 2010
    TOURNAMENT PLAYER’S DIARY 2011 – 2012 Senior Diary The Senior Circuits were re-named in 2010 to: Challenger = Senior Gold Satellite = Senior Silver Orbital = Senior Bronze The name change has been done to provide: Clarity on circuit pathway for juniors through to adult Clarity on circuit for parents/players who are new to the sport Connection of BADMINTON England circuits as a „family‟ of circuits and a genuine progression route The Senior Circuits are open to any members of BADMINTON England to enter. More information can be found on the BADMINTON England website(s): http://www.badmintonengland.co.uk http://www.badmintonengland.co.uk/compete Note: SC = Sports Centre or Sports Club: LC = Leisure Centre: RC = Recreation Centre Date Title of Tournament / Closing Tournament Secretary or office to From 2011 Event Venue Date contact for forms AUGUST 8 – 14 World Badminton Badminton World Federation Championships http://www.bwfbadminton.org Wembley Arena 20 – 21 Kent SENIOR SILVER 6.8.11 Sally Murrary Medway Park, Mill Road, Hill Top, 39 Roke Road Gillingham, Kent, ME7 1HF Kenley, Surrey, CR8 5DZ Tel: 01634 333111 Tel: 07976 814 919 (M) [email protected] 27 Hampshire Badminton 12.8.11 Graham Troke Association Open Singles 9 Cerdic Mews, Hamble Le-Rice, Tournament Southampton, Hants, SO31 4LW (Supported by HEAD) Tel: 02380 455 183/07919 205283 Westgate Badminton Centre, [email protected] Cheriton Road, Winchester, Hants, SO22 5AZ Tel: 01962 877 626 1 SEPTEMBER 3 - 4 Hertfordshire SENIOR SILVER 10.8.11 Eddie Lintott Hertfordshire
    [Show full text]