The Nordic Digital Ecosystem Actors, Strategies, Opportunities

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Nordic Digital Ecosystem Actors, Strategies, Opportunities NORDIC INNOVATION REPORT 2015:08 // DECEMBER 2015 The Nordic Digital Ecosystem Actors, Strategies, Opportunities The Nordic Digital Ecosystem Actors, Strategies, Opportunities Authors: Lars van Marion Rambøll Management Consulting Jon Honerud Hovland Red Tape Crossing December 2015 Nordic Innovation Publication 2015 The Nordic Digital Ecosystem Actors, Strategies, Opportunities Nordic Innovation Publication 2015:08© Nordic Innovation, Oslo 2015 ISBN 978-82-8277-080-4 (Print) ISBN 978-82-8277-079-8 (Digital) (URL: http://norden.diva-portal.org) Authors: Lars van Marion Rambøll Management Consulting Jon Honerud Hovland Red Tape Crossing Publisher: Nordic Innovation, Stensberggata 25, NO-0170 Oslo, Norway Phone: (+47) 22 61 44 00. E-mail: [email protected] www.nordicinnovation.org All Nordic Innovation publications can be downloaded free of charge as pdf files from http://norden.diva-portal.org Cover photo: 123RF Limited Copyright Nordic Innovation 2015. All rights reserved. This publication includes material protected under copyright law, the copyright for which is held by Nordic Innovation or a third party. Material contained here may not be used for commercial purposes. The contents are the opinion of the writers concerned and do not represent the official Nordic Innovation position. Nordic Innovation bears no responsi bility for any possible damage arising from the use of this material. The original source must be mentioned when quoting from this publication. Nordic Innovation Stensberggata 25, NO-0170 Oslo, Norway Phone: +47 47 61 44 00 [email protected] www.nordicinnovation.org Ramboll Hoffsveien 4, NO-0213 Oslo, Norway Phone: +47 22 52 59 03 www.ramboll.com Red Tape Crossing Sandsværveien 119, NO-3616 Kongsberg, Norway Phone: +47 93 00 87 91 [email protected] www.redtape.no TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of contents 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 10 2. Methodology ...................................................................................................................................... 12 3. The Nordic Public Landscape ................................................................................................... 14 3.1 Denmark ................................................................................................................................................................15 3.2 Finland .................................................................................................................................................................. 21 3.3 Iceland .................................................................................................................................................................. 27 3.4 Norway ...................................................................................................................................................................31 3.5 Sweden ..................................................................................................................................................................37 4. The Potential for Nordic Collaboration ................................................................................45 4.1 The strategies and beyond .......................................................................................................................... 45 4.2 What do the Nordic stakeholders tell us ................................................................................. 47 4.3 Possible cases for further Nordic digital collaboration ............................................... 52 5. Conclusions and Recommendations .................................................................................. 57 5.1 Key findings ........................................................................................................................................................57 5.2 Conclusions ........................................................................................................................................................61 5.3 Recommendations .......................................................................................................................................62 Appendix 1 6. The Nordic Digital Eco System ................................................................................................63 6.1 The actors of Denmark .............................................................................................................................63 6.2 The actors of Finland .................................................................................................................................70 6.3 The actors of Iceland .................................................................................................................................77 6.4 The actors of Norway ................................................................................................................................81 6.5 The actors of Sweden ...............................................................................................................................93 Appendix 2 7. Maturity and Receptiveness of the Nordics ....................................................................101 7.1 Rankings and comparisons ................................................................................................................101 7.2 Assessment of Nordic governments’ maturity ...................................................................120 7.3 Summary of recent reports, benchmarks and assessments .................................123 6 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of figures and tables Figure 4.1 ................................................................................................................................................. 47 Figure 4.2 ................................................................................................................................................ 48 Figure 4.3 ................................................................................................................................................ 49 Figure 4.4 ................................................................................................................................................ 49 Figure 4.5 ................................................................................................................................................ 50 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Executive summary This report describes possibilities for Nordic digital collaboration by providing an overview of the actors in the Nordic digital eco-system and their characteristics, an analysis of the actors’ will and abilities to collaborate, and a discussion of potential business cases for such collaboration. It seems evident that the public actors see benefits in enhanced Nordic knowledge sharing and joint projects in the area of digitalization. The results indicate that the actors believe such collaboration can: a) Provide more efficient ways of developing and delivering digital services within each country. b) Provide cross-border services to citizens residing and enterprises doing business in the Nordic countries. c) Spearhead European initiatives. d) Provide better market opportunities for Nordic-based ICT businesses. Through a mapping of the actors in the Nordic digital eco-system, and an analysis of recent international benchmarks, the report shows that Nordic countries have a comparatively high level of digital service provision. Furthermore, the countries have highly developed specialized sectors, which deliver many complex and high- quality government services. The modernization of the Nordic public sectors through digitalization seems to be backed by formal plans and political commitment. The strategic goals are basically the same and revolve around improving government services through the sharing of information resources between government agencies. The principle of “once-only” registration of relevant data, which is also embraced by the EU1 , appears to be common ground for the Nordic countries. Although the Nordic countries are high achievers, the study indicates that there are notable differences between the countries in terms of the topics they excel in. The ways in which the Nordic countries work towards achieving these goals also differ a lot. On the one hand, we find differences that can be explained by different national/political priorities. On the other hand, there are significant differences in how the countries govern their national digitalization efforts. The latter can be viewed as an obstacle to formalizing Nordic digital collaboration. The coordinating bodies of countries such as Norway and Sweden are to a lesser degree able to mandate such collaboration between agencies than their peers in countries such as Denmark, Finland and Iceland. 1 http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-15-4919_en.htm 8 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The study indicates that most public actors are involved in Nordic collaboration of some kind. The Nordic countries look to one another for inspiration, and there are a handful of cross-national pilot projects and reports. The actors see the benefits of greater collaboration on digitalization within the Nordic region. However, the countries seem to lack formal arenas for knowledge sharing and coordinating joint projects. The report also indicates that there is a lack of political attention to Nordic digital
Recommended publications
  • Magnov2004reformat For
    Upcoming Events TABLE TENNIS INFO March 24-28 NZ Veteran Championships Whangarei April 20-21 Summer Nationals—Teams North Harbour Issue: 25 November 2004 22-24 Summer Nationals—Individuals North Harbour April 29-6 May World Championships Shanghai China May 7-8 Marlborough Open Blenheim June 4-5 North Harbour Open North Harbour 18 Hawkes Bay Open Napier July 8-10 North Island Open Auckland © August 13-14 Northland Open Whangarei August to be advised South Island Open Timaru September 28-29 NZ Schools Championships Christchurch 30-8 Oct NZ Open Championships Christchurch Change in Direction for IT Strategy National Coaches lack time to continue Table Tennis WORLD RANKINGS appreciates Lots from Around the Country Five top rated players in NZ (as at 1st November 2004) the support Racketlon????? given by: Women Men Li Chunli 51 Karen Li 133 Peter Jackson 278 Anna Lee 360 Aaron Li 281 Open Mixed Doubles Final Sabine Westenra 502 Shane Laugesen 426 Jiang Yang 574 Andrew Hubbard 432 New Zealand Championships --- Auckland Brad Chen 645 World Rankings by country at: http://www.ittf.com Published by TABLE TENNIS New Zealand Inc. Phone (04) 9162459 Fax (04) 4712152 P O Box 867 Level 5, Compudigm House 49 Boulcott St, Wellington E-mail - [email protected] World Wide Web - http://www.tabletennis.org.nz Photo courtesy: Terry Cockfield Produced by: Articles, letters and advertising Robin Radford Ph 04-232 5672 published herein do not necessarily 16 St Edmund Cres Tawa Fax 04-232 9172 L/R: Shane Laugesen (Auck) & Karen Li (Nth Hb), Wellington E-Mail [email protected] reflect the views of Table Tennis Anna Lee (Canty) & Seo Dong Chul (Korea).
    [Show full text]
  • Judo Finnish Open 10Th-11Th 2007 Vantaa Finland Men 60 Kg 1. Fatih
    Judo Finnish Open 10th-11th 2007 Vantaa Finland Men 60 kg 1. Fatih TERIM Turkey 2. Nick KOSSOR United States 3. Scott MALONE Scotland 3. Gonzalo IBANEZ Canada 5. Juho REINVALL Finland 5. Tatu SAARINEN Finland Men 66 kg 1. Colin OATES Great Britain 2. Justin FLORES United States 3. Taylor TAKATA United States 3. James MILLAR Scotland 5. Michal POPIEL Canada 5. Joel BENOIT Canada Men 73 kg 1. Iain FEENAN Scotland 2. Michael ELDRED United States 3. Thomas IBURG Denmark 3. Alexander LUBCHENKO Russia 5. Gatis MILENBERGS Latvia 5. Nathaniel STAPLETON Great Britain Men 81 kg 1. Travis STEVENS United States 2. Aigars MILENBERGS Latvia 3. Mika TOROI Finland 3. Tyler BORAS Canada 5. Michael KAZYDUB Russia 5. Petteri LUUKKAINEN Finland Men 90 kg 1. Landry AMBOUROUE United States 2. Jerry LAMMASNIEMI Finland 3. Burhan KOCAN Turkey 3. Aleksandr MARMELJUK Estonia 5. Joakim NORLING Sweden 5. Akseli HALTTU Finland Men 100 kg 1. Martin PACEK Sweden 2. Rauli KÄRPÄNEN Finland 3. Andrew BURNS Great Britain 3. Adler VOLMAR United States 5. Villepetteri LAMMASNIEMI Finland 5. Gábor POTYI Hungary Men +100 kg 1. Thormodur JONSSON Iceland 2. Nodar METREVELI Georgia 3. Christoffer JOHANSSON Sweden 3. Anthony TURNER United States 5. Mustafa AKPINAR Turkey 5. Joe DELAHAY Great Britain Women 48 kg 1. Sayaka MATSUMOTO United States 2. Ann SHIRAISHI United States 3. Oiana BLANCO ETXEBERRIA Spain 3. Jeannette RODRIGUEZ United States 5. Bianca OCKEDAHL Canada 5. Kaisu REDSVEN Finland Women 52 kg 1. Kubra TEKNECI Turkey 2. Sanna ASKELÖF Sweden 3. Anni IKÄLÄ Finland 3. Tiia SUO-YRJÖ Finland 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Judo Finnish Open 8.-9. November 2003 Vantaa Finland Judo Finnish Open 8.-9
    Judo Finnish Open 8.-9. November 2003 Vantaa Finland Judo Finnish Open 8.-9. November 2003 Vantaa Finland EJU B-Tournament Results 2002 Results Contest sheets and statistics available here Men under 60 kg Women under 48 kg 1. Roland STEGMÜLLER Austria 1. Fiona ROBERTSON Great Britain 2. Andrei GODOVNIKOV Russia 2. Isabel LATULIPPE Canada 3. Frazer WILL Canada 3. Satu PIETARSAARI Finland 3. Valtteri JOKINEN Finland 3. Brigitte THIBAULT Canada 5. Roman RAKHMENKULOV Russia 5. Pontus HJERM Sweden Women under 52 kg 1. Jaana SUNDBERG Finland Men under 66 kg 2. Sanna ASKELÖF Sweden 1. Arten PYKHTIN Russia 3. Esther DURTSCHI Germany 2. Manuel MÜLLER Germany 3. Carolina JOHANSSON Sweden 3. Denis KOZLOV Latvia 5. Laurie WILTSHIRE Canada 3. Aarne PITKÄNEN Finland 5. Satu HUIKURI Finland 5. Gareth CARDER Great Britain 5. Ivan CHASHCHIN Russia Women under 57 kg 1. Maria LINDBERG Sweden Men under 73 kg 2. Swenja KROSIEN Germany 1. Robert BRENDAL Germany 3. Natalia YUHAREVA Russia 2. Markus PEKKOLA Finland 3. Louise RENICKS Great Britain 3. David PAPAUX Switzerland 5. Jennie ANDREASSON Sweden 3. Radu BRESTYAN Sweden 5. Jenny NYBERG Sweden 5. Ilya NIKOLAEV Russia 5. Vladimir GRILL Estonia Women under 63 kg 1. Johanna YLINEN Finland Men under 81 kg 2. Isabelle PEARSON Canada 1. Thilo PACHMANN Switzerland 3. Esther MYREBOE Norway 2. Roland KASPER Austria 3. Jenny DAVIS Great Britain 3. Janne ROMPPANEN Finland 5. Nicole SYDBÖGE Denmark 3. Jouni RANTA Finland 5. Danielle BEATON Canada 5. Mika TOROI Finland 5. Florian RINNERTHALER Austria Women under 70 kg 1. Marie-Helene CHISHOLM Canada Men under 90 kg 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Invitation – Finnish Open 2020 – Final
    INVITATION to compete in FINNISH OPEN 2020 World ranking and Badminton Europe Elite Circuit International Challenge Tournament Tournament dates 2 – 5 April 2020 Entry closes on 3 March 2020 Official hotel reservation closing date 13 March 2020 ORGANISER Badminton Finland, Valimotie 10, FIN-00380 Helsinki Event coordinator - Ilkka Hellgren Phone: +358 40 526 9939 E-mail: [email protected] https://finnishopen.sulkapallo.fi/en/ REFEREES Tournament Referee: Jens Köster (Germany) - [email protected] Deputy referee: Ari Vartiainen (Finland) – [email protected] DATES Wednesday 1 April 2020 - Practice courts available 16:00-21:00 at the venue Wednesday 1 April 2020 – Team Managers meeting 19:00 at the venue Wednesday 1 April 2020 – Umpire briefing 20:00 at the venue Thursday 2 April 2020: Qualifications (if necessary) from 09.00 Friday 3 April 2020: Main tournament from 09.00 Saturday 4 April 2020: Quarter Finals from 10.00 and Semi-Finals from 16.00 Sunday 5 April 2020: Finals from 10.00 The final frame schedule shall be made at least 20 days before the start of the tournament and shall be published on the tournament’s website. The organizer will arrange the transport from and to the official hotel for Team Managers and Umpires for meetings on April the 1st. VENUE Energia Areena, Rajatorpantie 23, FIN-01600 Vantaa Phone: +358 10 633 0303 (during tournament only) There will be free transportation between the official tournament hotel and the tournament venue for those who stay in the official hotel. CONDITIONS The Finnish Open will be conducted under the BWF General Competition Regulations and in accordance with the Badminton Europe Elite Circuit Regulations, of which the Finnish Open forms a part.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comprehensive Analysis of Publications by Finnish Researchers
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Open access at the national level: A comprehensive analysis of publications by Finnish researchers Janne Pölönen1 , Mikael Laakso2 , Raf Guns3 , Emanuel Kulczycki4 , and Gunnar Sivertsen5 an open access journal 1Federation of Finnish Learned Societies, Snellmaninkatu 13, 00170 Helsinki (Finland) 2Hanken School of Economics, Information Systems Science, Arkadiankatu 22, 00100, Helsinki (Finland) 3University of Antwerp, Faculty of Social Sciences, Centre for R&D Monitoring (ECOOM), Middelheimlaan 1, 2020 Antwerp (Belgium) 4Adam Mickiewicz University, Scholarly Communication Research Group, Szamarzewskiego 89c, 60-568 Poznan (Poland) 5Nordic Institute for Studies in Innovation, Research and Education (NIFU), P.O. Box 2815,0608 Tøyen, Oslo (Norway) Citation: Pölönen, J., Laakso, M., Guns, R., Kulczycki, E., & Sivertsen, G. (2020). Keywords: bibliographic data, bibliometrics, data quality, open access, scholarly communication, Open access at the national level: A comprehensive analysis of science policy publications by Finnish researchers. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(4), 1396–1428. https://doi.org/10.1162 /qss_a_00084 ABSTRACT DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00084 Open access (OA) has mostly been studied by relying on publication data from selective international databases, notably Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus. The aim of our study is to Received: 25 October 2019 Accepted: 02 August 2020 show that it is possible to achieve a national estimate of the number and share of OA based on institutional publication data providing a comprehensive coverage of the peer-reviewed Corresponding Author: Janne Pölönen outputs across fields, publication types, and languages. Our data consists of 48,177 journal, [email protected] conference, and book publications from 14 Finnish universities in 2016–2017, including Handling Editor: information about OA status, as self-reported by researchers and validated by data-collection Ludo Waltman personnel through their Current Research Information System (CRIS).
    [Show full text]
  • ICT Cluster Finland Review 2005
    TIEKE ven Knowledge Economy. Finland’s Technology Policy Yields Fruit. |global view| Again? |international cooperation| Finland and WSIS. ICT for Development – Can esource in Global Competition |communications| Broadband Connections and mmunications| Ever Tougher Competition on All Fronts. Finnet Group – Believes d development| Information and Communications Technologies. New Business gmas of lifelong learning in engineering education. Finnish Open Source – Flying uality. Jyväskylä – Human Technology City Known for Its User Friendly Internet the Resque of SME’s |investments in finland| Finland – Easy Going Markets and ng Center – an Innovative Landing to Japan. New Era of Building Management. gh-Technology – AirBuccaneers. In the Cross Roads of Development – from “ICT- bal Information Society. Report on Finland in the Global Economy: Competence, and.fi. Welcome to the Meeting Point for Information Society Developers ICT CLUSTER FINLAND REVIEW 2005 |editorial| Finnish Structures Favourable to Future Changes During the past decade, Finland has successfully built a dynamic Contents developing knowledge economy while maintaining the basic characteristics of the Nordic welfare model. The digitalisation has increased overall productivity in society and offered new market opportunities for digital content producers and service providers. 4 ICT – Essential Tool for the Future 6 Finland In order to secure continuity of development and competitiveness, An ICT-Driven Knowledge Economy Finland will need to be able to produce specialised products and services that are applicable to digital environment. A well recognized 10 Finland’s Technology Policy Yields unbalance still exists between manufacturing of digital products and Fruit content production. Meanwhile, the structures – economy, education, capital and even age – of the Finnish society are favourable to the 12 Finnish ICT Development changes ahead.
    [Show full text]
  • Master's Thesis
    Master’s Thesis Master's Degree Programme in Business Administration, Leadership and Service Design YDESAS16 2019 Susanna Lehtojärvi TOWARDS HAPPY ADMINISTRATION AND LEADERSHIP IN A SPORTS CLUB A design thinking approach to study the member experience with the Olympic Committee’s Suomisport ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Instructor Päivi Katajamäki, Senior Lecturer, Turku University of Applied Sciences, has provided intensive support on this thesis process. Also, all my opponents in the seminars have provided valuable perspectives to improve my thesis further. Ulla Seppälä-Kaven, Senior Lecturer, Turku University of Applied Sciences has guided our student groups’ way during these years. It has been fascinating and life changing experience to study with a such diverse group of professionals from different countries, various fields of businesses and especially with a group of persons who have an amazing ability to develop services but also our mutual co-operation and even the study program itself. It has been a privilege to work at the Suomisport pilot together with Hanna Hiilamo, Account Manager and Rainer Anttila, Manager, from the Finnish Olympic Committee as well as the professionals Jarno Ojala, UX designer, PhD, and Ari Kontiainen, Project Manager, from Vincit. Humble thanks belong to the badminton community, especially to those committed board members, who have sacrificed their precious and valuable time to enable insights and profound understanding for this thesis. Discussions with Ilkka Hellgren, Event Manager, the Finnish Badminton Association, has offered reliable source of understanding the existing challenges and the future direction also in a wider context than this thesis. Warm thanks to Laura Elo, Work Life Developer, Cambiare, who has provided me valuable learnings and perspective to understand differences of the people throughout my journey in the MBA studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Join the World's Fastest Growing Racket Sport
    Join the world’s fastest growing Racket Sport Christoph Krenn (AUT), World No. 1 History of Racketlon • 1988 first Racket games Finnish Championships. Since then played annually in Finland • In 1989 in Swedish Championships • November 2001 the first World Championships Tournament in Gothenburg, Sweden • 2002 International Racketlon Federation was founded as an official body • FIR World Tour started in 2003 • 2005 first legal national country federations were founded • In November 2005 IRF – International Racketlon Federation legally founded • September 2006 Official name change to Fédération Internationale de Racketlon – FIR Rules of Racketlon • You play your opponent in the order Tabletennis, Badminton, Squash and Tennis • Four sets (one in each sport) first to 21 points (two points difference at 20:20) • Running score, each rally counts • Gummiarm (one single serve in Tennis) decides in Tennis if score is equal after four sets • Lots are drawn once before the match who serves in Tabletennis and Squash. Opponent serves in Badminton and Tennis • Each player serves twice in all sports before change of service • Change ends when one player has 11 points in each set • All other rules of the individual sports apply Organization of FIR • IRF founded in 2005 Gothenburg, Sweden • FIR established in Austria • FIR head office in Vienna • FIR has 37 member countries • FIR Council with 9 members from 9 countries • FIR Executive-President Marcel Weigl • Annual General Meeting with all the member countries More facts • We are a globally spread sport
    [Show full text]
  • The Success of the Finnish Model: an Economic Analysis
    Journal of Management Policies and Practices June 2019, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 12-20 ISSN: 2333-6048 (Print), 2333-6056 (Online) Copyright © The Author(s). All Rights Reserved. Published by American Research Institute for Policy Development DOI: 10.15640/jmpp.v7n1a2 URL: https://doi.org/10.15640/jmpp.v7n1a2 The Success of the Finnish Model: An Economic Analysis Jordi Franch Parella1 Abstract Finland is considered an example of how interventionist governmental policies work and a success under many socio-economic standards. From social indicators like inequality and crime to economic indicators like productivity and innovation the Nordic country gathers near the top. We inquire into the causes of the Finnish economic success, ascertaining which is the role of the Welfare State and the public sector in it. In fact, we examine which is the relation of causality between the good socio-economic performance and the public sector. Finland is a competitive market economy that has developed a functional Welfare State within a context of liberalisation and free choice. In this paper, we research the causes of this successful model. Keywords: Nordic model, Finland, capitalism, socialism, Welfare State JEL Classification: I00, O52, P00 1. Introduction Finland, the most northerly country in the European Union (EU), disposes of an inhospitable and extreme climatology. The low temperatures and the cold Baltic wind make life in public outdoor spaces unattractive. The differences with the southern European countries are very noticeable from the first moment (Franch, 2017). The Nordic economies are usually seen, not only in Europe but also in the USA (Aleem, 2015) as an example of efficient Welfare States where the government provides a large range of social benefits.
    [Show full text]
  • Finchat: Corpus and Evaluation Setup for Finnish Chat Conversations on Everyday Topics
    FinChat: Corpus and evaluation setup for Finnish chat conversations on everyday topics Katri Leino1, Juho Leinonen1, Mittul Singh1, Sami Virpioja2, Mikko Kurimo1 1Department of Signal Processing and Acoustics, Aalto University, Finland 2Department of Digital Humanities, University of Helsinki, Finland [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract evaluation setups available. Meanwhile, using machine trans- lated corpora from well-resourced languages is dependent on Creating open-domain chatbots requires large amounts of con- the translation quality which for Finnish is a concern at the mo- versational data and related benchmark tasks to evaluate them. ment. In this work, our focus is to bridge this gap for Finnish Standardized evaluation tasks are crucial for creating automatic and to bootstrap open-domain chatbot research in the language. evaluation metrics for model development; otherwise, compar- We provide the FinChat corpus and evaluation setup to support ing the models would require resource-expensive human evalu- this aim. ation. While chatbot challenges have recently managed to pro- The FinChat corpus consists of Finnish chat conversations vide a plethora of such resources for English, resources in other on everyday topics collected from voluntary participants. Our languages are not yet available. In this work, we provide a goal is to collect conversations that are natural and engaging, starting point for Finnish open-domain chatbot research. We which are two important qualities of a human conversation [4]. describe our collection efforts to create the Finnish chat conver- To ensure naturalness, we do not restrict our participants to a sation corpus FinChat, which is made available publicly.
    [Show full text]
  • This Is How the Gas Market Opened in Finland Gasgrid Finland Oy, 17 June 2020
    This is how the gas market opened in Finland Gasgrid Finland Oy, 17 June 2020 Contents . 1 The first decades of natural gas in Finland . 2 The Natural Gas Directives encouraged opening the market . 2 The Balticconnector project was born . 3 Establishing the market . 4 The establishment of Gasgrid Finland was preceded by a transitional phase 5 The market opened . 6 Customer experiences . 7 Gas market integration . 8 The way forward . 9 This is how the gas market opened in Finland The first decades of natural gas in Finland Energy use of natural gas in Finland began in January Finland: along the west coast, via southwest Finland 1974 in the middle of the first oil crisis. The price of crude to Sweden or from Norway via Sweden to Finland and oil and all petroleum products suddenly doubled or under the Gulf of Finland to Estonia. In the background, tripled. Construction of the natural gas pipeline from the there was the idea of bringing gas to Finland not only Soviet Union via Imatra to Kouvola had already begun from Russia but also from the West. The matter was also a couple of years earlier and, despite some challenges seen as a security of supply issue, and there were doubts along the way, was completed on schedule. about whether the Soviet Union or later Russia could Gas imports had a positive effect on balancing cut off gas imports to Finland for economic or political the trade between Finland and the Soviet Union and reasons. In practice, however, such a situation did not facilitated the transition of southeast Finnish industry to occur in Finland.
    [Show full text]
  • Fascinating Adventures
    Lake Saimaa Finland Lappeenranta and Imatra region NORWAY LAPPEENRANTA AND IMATRA REGION – LAKE SAIMAA FINLAND 2017 RUSSIA South SWEDEN Rovaniemi Karelia Parikkala FINLAND Rautjärvi Ruokolahti Savitaipale LAPPEENRANNAN Taipalsaari Rauha / IMATRA Oulu Joutseno Imatra border crossing Lemi LAPPEENRANTA Luumäki Nuijamaa Nuijamaa border crossing Vainikkala Kajaani Ylämaa Vainikkala border crossing (Allegro train) SEUTU IMATRAN JA Saimaa canal VYBORG Vaalimaa LAKE SAIMAA Vaalimaa border crossing Kuopio Travel visa-free from Vaasa our region to Russia 2017 SUOMI Joensuu Jyväskylä Savonlinna Fascinating Mikkeli Pori Tampere IMATRA LAPPEENRANTA Lahti adventures Vyborg Turku Vantaa Моscow Espoo & PEACEFUL NATURE IN THE LAKE SAIMAA REGION HELSINKI St. Petersburg Stockholm Tallinn THE BEST HOLIDAY TIPS – EVENTS, SIGHTS, CRUISES, SPAS, HIKING AND GOLFING The 4 seasons of Lake Saimaa – 4 distinctly different travel experiences. DEC – JAN – FEB MAR – APR – MAY Winter –35°C...10°C Spring –20°C...20°C Contrary to the popular belief, the temperature isn’t always Alright, don’t think that us Finns treat Spring like an after- freezing here in Finland. But it does get quite cold in here dur- thought, just some empty space between the icy winter and ing winter – which is great! During winter the snow and frost steamy summer. No, no, no my friend, Spring is the season we create amazing opportunities for skating, cross country skiing, appreciate the most. Why? – well the retreating ice, sparkling downhill skiing, snowshoeing, snowmobiling and winter fish- waves and budding nature are all reasons to be extra cheer- ing. Also, remember to listen to the silence of the wintertime ful. Also while we’re being boastful, Lake Saimaa is at it’s best nature, gaze at the pure white snow, build a snowman – or if during this time of the year, especially if you’re looking to do you’re feeling especially courageous, try ice swimming.
    [Show full text]