DOCSLIB.ORG

Otwarty Dostęp W Polsce

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Otwarty Dostęp W Polsce 2 SPIS TREŚCI WPROWADZENIE ........................................................................................................... 10 STRESZCZENIE ............................................................................................................... 13 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................ 18 PRZEDMIOT EKSPERTYZY .......................................................................................... 23 KONTEKST REALIZACJI EKSPERTYZY – NOWE TECHNOLOGIE, NOWE SPOSOBY KOMUNIKOWANIA SIĘ, NOWE SPOSOBY TWORZENIA TREŚCI ...... 26 ANALIZA INSTYTUCJONALNA WDROŻENIA OTWARTEGO DOSTĘPU ............. 32 PERSPEKTYWA RZĄDOWA ...................................................................................... 32 USA................................................................................................................................ 32 OGÓLNA CHARAKTERYSTYKA ......................................................................... 32 STRUKTURA............................................................................................................ 33 POLITYKA OTWARTEGO DOSTĘPU ................................................................... 34 ZŁOŻONOŚĆ JAKO MENEDŻERSKIE WYZWANIE .......................................... 34 KONKLUZJA ............................................................................................................ 37 WPROWADZENIE POLITYKI OTWARTEGO DOSTĘPU ................................... 37 KONKLUZJA ............................................................................................................ 42 NIEMCY ........................................................................................................................ 43 OGÓLNA CHARAKTERYSTYKA ......................................................................... 43 STRUKTURA............................................................................................................ 44 POLITYKA OTWARTEGO DOSTĘPU ................................................................... 44 KONKLUZJA ............................................................................................................ 48 WIELKA BRYTANIA ................................................................................................... 48 OGÓLNA CHARAKTERYSTYKA ......................................................................... 48 STRUKTURA............................................................................................................ 49 POLITYKA OTWARTEGO DOSTĘPU ................................................................... 49 KONKLUZJA ............................................................................................................ 55 HOLANDIA .................................................................................................................. 56 OGÓLNA CHARAKTERYSTYKA ......................................................................... 56 EFEKT SAMORZĄDU NA POZIOMIE KRAJOWYM .......................................... 56 POLITYKA RZĄDOWA ........................................................................................... 58 KONKLUZJA ............................................................................................................ 60 DANIA ........................................................................................................................... 60 OGÓLNA CHARAKTERYSTYKA ......................................................................... 60 KONTEKST .............................................................................................................. 60 KONKLUZJA ............................................................................................................ 62 4 SZWECJA...................................................................................................................... 62 OGÓLNA CHARAKTERYSTYKA ......................................................................... 62 POLITYKA OTWARTEGO DOSTĘPU ................................................................... 63 KONKLUZJE ............................................................................................................ 64 NORWEGIA .................................................................................................................. 64 OGÓLNA CHARAKTERYSTYKA ......................................................................... 64 POLITYKA OTWARTEGO DOSTĘPU ................................................................... 64 KONKLUZJA ............................................................................................................ 66 FINLANDIA .................................................................................................................. 66 OGÓLNA CHARAKTERYSTYKA ......................................................................... 66 ZALECENIA MEMORANDUM. ............................................................................. 66 KONKLUZJA ............................................................................................................ 68 FRANCJA ...................................................................................................................... 68 OGÓLNA CHARAKTERYSTYKA ......................................................................... 68 POLITYKA OTWARTEGO DOSTĘPU ................................................................... 68 DIGITALIZACJA ZASOBÓW KULTURY .............................................................. 70 KONKLUZJA ............................................................................................................ 71 AUSTRALIA ................................................................................................................. 71 OGÓLNA CHARAKTERYSTYKA ......................................................................... 71 POLITYKA „OTWARTEGO DOSTĘPU‖ ................................................................ 72 KONKLUZJA ............................................................................................................ 84 BRAZYLIA ................................................................................................................... 84 OGÓLNA CHARAKTERYSTYKA ......................................................................... 84 CZASOPISMA OD .................................................................................................... 85 DZIAŁALNOŚĆ BIINT ............................................................................................ 86 KONKLUZJA ............................................................................................................ 88 CHIŃSKA REBUBLIKA LUDOWA ............................................................................ 88 OGÓLNA CHARAKTERYSTYKA ......................................................................... 88 INTRODUKCJA OTWARTEGO DOSTĘPU ........................................................... 89 FAZA EKSPERYMENTU I WDROŻENIA ............................................................. 90 PRZEKSZTAŁCENIA CZASOPISM NAUKOWYCH ............................................ 91 KONKLUZJA ............................................................................................................ 92 PORÓWNANIE DOŚWIADCZEŃ NA POZIOMIE RZĄDOWYM ........................... 93 PERSPEKTYWA PONADNARODOWA ..................................................................... 98 INSTYTUCJE UNII EUROPEJSKIEJ .......................................................................... 98 OGÓLNA CHARAKTERYSTYKA ......................................................................... 98 AGENDA OD ............................................................................................................ 98 5 PROCES POLITYCZNY ........................................................................................ 100 BADANIA I INFRASTRUKTURA ........................................................................ 102 KONKLUZJA .......................................................................................................... 103 WORLD BANK OPEN DATA INITIATIVE .............................................................. 103 PERSPEKTYWA POZARZĄDOWA .......................................................................... 104 FUNDACJE ................................................................................................................. 104 OGÓLNA CHARAKTERYSTYKA ....................................................................... 104 DIAGNOZA ............................................................................................................ 104 POLITYKA OTWARTEGO DOSTĘPU ................................................................. 106 ROZWÓJ OTWARTEGO DOSTĘPU ..................................................................... 107 KONKLUZJA .......................................................................................................... 108 WYDAWCY ................................................................................................................ 109 OGÓLNA CHARAKTERYSTYKA ....................................................................... 109 WYDAWCY OD (PLOS, BIOMED CENTRAL) ................................................... 109 WYDAWCY KOMERCYJNI ................................................................................. 114 KONKLUZJA .......................................................................................................... 115 REPOZYTORIA .........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • COUNCIL of the EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 20 September 2013 (OR. En) 13812/13 ADD 4 RECH 410 COMPET 663 MI 779 TELECOM 238 COVER N
    COUNCIL OF Brussels, 20 September 2013 THE EUROPEAN UNION (OR. en) 13812/13 ADD 4 RECH 410 COMPET 663 MI 779 TELECOM 238 COVER NOTE From: Secretary-General of the European Commission, signed by Mr Jordi AYET PUIGARNAU, Director date of receipt: 20 September 2013 To: Mr Uwe CORSEPIUS, Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union No. Cion doc.: SWD(2013) 333 final 4/5 Subject: COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT National measures in support of ERA Member States of the European Union Accompanying the document REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT EUROPEAN RESEARCH AREA PROGRESS REPORT 2013 Delegations will find attached document SWD(2013) 333 final 4/5 . Encl.: SWD(2013) 333 final 4/5 13812/13 ADD 4 AFG/nj DG G III EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 20.9.2013 SWD(2013) 333 final 4/5 COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT National measures in support of ERA Member States of the European Union Accompanying the document REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT EUROPEAN RESEARCH AREA PROGRESS REPORT 2013 {COM(2013) 637 final} EN EN Austria ERA Priority ERA Action National Measure contributing to ERA Year Adoption How the measure contributes to ERA The Austrian Research, Technological Development and Innovation Strategy “Becoming an Innovation Leader: Realising Potentials, Increasing Dynamics, Creating the Future" was published in March 2011. It introduces a coordinated vision and strategy across all ministries in charge of RTDI and identifies new challenges. Also in 2011 a Task Force of senior officials was put in place to coordinate activities from the strategic perspective and monitor the implementation of this strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • EIFL Open Access Case Study Students for Open Access in Poland
    EIFL Open Access Case Study Students for Open Access in Poland Katarzyna Rybicka, Fundacja Projekt: Polska, Centrum Cyfrowe Results of the EIFL-funded project, October 2014 “At our faculty researchers publish a number of publications. But we do not have access to them. Sometimes it is even hard to find out that they actually exist. The same thing happens with the scientific works written by students. Open access is not only about increasing citation, which refers to professors and researchers. Through our actions we show a variety of practical benefits of open access, both for students and researchers. Because open access is our common cause.” – Ewa Majdecka, student, Opener Initiative, Institute of Applied Social Sciences at Warsaw University “In Poland, students get access to the results of research mainly through unauthorized reproduction: scanning and copying. Still only small part of educational materials is available online. Bottom-up initiatives based on the open access idea such as the Open Science Library replace this model by providing access, but with the consent and on rules defined by the authors. Our experience shows that scientists are willing to share their knowledge, you only need to create favorable conditions in order to make it more visible.” – Klaudia Grabowska, project coordinator, Open Science Library "Implementation of open access in Poland is necessary not only to adapt Polish learning system to European standards. It is primarily an opportunity to increase innovation flowing from the free exchange of knowledge. And the possibility of reducing the cost of studying and research.” – Alek Tarkowski, Centrum Cyfrowe Projekt: Polska Foundation, Creative Commons Poland INTRODUCTION Open access (OA) is gaining popularity among Polish researchers, but it has not yet been promoted well among students.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Open Access in Practice – Results and Recommendations from the Danish Project (2017-2018)
    Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Sep 26, 2021 Green Open Access in Practice – results and recommendations from the Danish project (2017-2018) Sand, Ane Ahrenkiel; Schneider, Anette Wergeland Publication date: 2019 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link back to DTU Orbit Citation (APA): Sand, A. A. (Author), & Schneider, A. W. (Author). (2019). Green Open Access in Practice – results and recommendations from the Danish project (2017-2018). Sound/Visual production (digital), Technical University of Denmark. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. GREEN OPEN ACCESS IN PRACTICE – results and recommendations from the Danish project (2017-2018) ANE AHRENKIEL SAND and ANETTE WERGELAND SCHNEIDER EMBARGO UKSG 42nd Annual Conference and Exhibition: Telford, UK PERMITTED ADDITIONAL OPEN ACCESS ISSUES DATE: April 08 2019–April 10 2019 VERSIONS SYSTEM PUBLISHER INFRA- PRACTICES STRUCTURE THE RIGHTS AND WORKFLOW LICENSES OF RESEARCHERS 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Studies
    JUNE 1, 2015 Education, Research and Open Access in Denmark PASTEUR4OA PROJECT CRISTIN Jens H. Aasheim, Nina Karlstrøm Education, Research and Open Access in Denmark Education, Research and Open Access in Denmark The following is a short presentation of the education system, research and Open Access in Denmark. As regional coordinator for the Nordic region, CRIStin (Current Research Information System in Norway) was asked to write a case study of Denmark. This study is based in large on data and statistics provided by the Danish Key Node, Anne Sandfær, and the Danish Ministry of Higher Education and Science. Summary As one of the countries to focus on Open Access quite early, Denmark was off to a head start. E.g. the Danish government appointed an Open Access Committee to recommend steps on how to implement the transition to Open Access. But progress has been time-consuming. However, several of the suggested recommendations have already been, or are now being implemented. National policies, joint policies for the Danish Research Councils and tools for monitoring Open Access output are some examples. The main focus of the Danish Open Access effort has been directed towards repositories, depositing and the so called green route. The research and scholarly communication system of the country Denmark has a population of 5.6 million, 7.5% of which have a university/college level education of five years or more. There has been a steady increase in output of the Danish research education programs, from over 1200 finished PhDs in 2009 to over 1600 in 2012. These graduate from one of the 8 universities, 7 university colleges or 4 university hospitals in Denmark.
    [Show full text]
  • EUROPEAN RESEARCH AREA Progress Report 2018
    EUROPEAN RESEARCH AREA Progress Report 2018 Country Profile DENMARK EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Research and Innovation Directorate A — Policy Development and Coordination Unit A2 — Research and Innovation Strategy Contact: Arie Van Der Zwan E-mail: [email protected] [email protected] European Commission B-1049 Brussels EUROPE DIRECT is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) The information given is free, as are most calls (though some operators, phone boxes or hotels may charge you) LEGAL NOTICE Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use which might be made of the following information. The views expressed in this publication are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Commission. More information on the European Union is available on the internet (http://europa.eu). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2019. PDF ISBN 978-92-79-99765-5 doi:10.2777/022506 KI-02-19-109-EN-N © European Union, 2019. Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Country profile: Denmark COUNTRY SNAPSHOT Indicator Performance Progress since ERA monitoring 2016 Reference Lead/Gap Reference Lead/Gap Trend Name Score Cluster EU-28 CAGR EU-28 year (Δ %) Period (Δ % pt) (2007-18) Adjusted Research Excellence Indicator (AREI) 2016 78.6 1 75 45.0 2013-16 7.1% 3.9 3.2% GBARD as share of
    [Show full text]
  • Brussels, 20.9.2013 SWD(2013) 333 Final
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 20.9.2013 SWD(2013) 333 final 4/5 COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT National measures in support of ERA Member States of the European Union Accompanying the document REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT EUROPEAN RESEARCH AREA PROGRESS REPORT 2013 {COM(2013) 637 final} EN EN Austria ERA Priority ERA Action National Measure contributing to ERA Year Adoption How the measure contributes to ERA The Austrian Research, Technological Development and Innovation Strategy “Becoming an Innovation Leader: Realising Potentials, Increasing Dynamics, Creating the Future" was published in March 2011. It introduces a coordinated vision and strategy across all ministries in charge of RTDI and identifies new challenges. Also in 2011 a Task Force of senior officials was put in place to coordinate activities from the strategic perspective and monitor the implementation of this strategy. Nine Introduce or enhance inter-ministerial working groups were established which competitive funding are active from 2012 on. These working groups focus on through calls for "climate change & scarce resources”, “quality of life and proposals and demographic change”, human potential, research The National Research, Technological More effective institutional infrastructures, knowledge transfer and start-ups, business Development and Innovation Strategy national assessments as the enterprise research, "internationalisation & external “Becoming an Innovation Leader: Realising 2011 research main modes of dimension"
    [Show full text]
  • Grey · Literature · and · Repositories · Conference
    c o n f e r e n c e · o n · g r e y · l i t e r a t u r e · a n d · r e p o s i t o r i e s · c o n f e r e n c e · o n · g r e y · l i t e r a t u r e · a n d · r e p o s i t o r i e s · c o n f e r e n c e · o n · g r e y · l i t e r a t u r e · a n d · r e p o s i t o r i e s · c o n f e r e n c e · o n · g r e y · l i t e r a t u r e · a n d · r e p o s i t o r i e s · c o n f e r e n c e · o n · g r e y · l i t e r a t u r e · a n d · r e p o s i t o r i e s · c o n f e r e n c e · o n · g r e y · l i t e r a t u r e · a n d · r e p o s i t o r i e s · c o n f e r e n c e · o n · g r e y · l i t e r a t u r e · a n d · r e p o s i t o r i e s · c o n f e r e n c e · o n · g r e y · l i t e r a t u r e · a n d · r e p o s i t o r i e s · c o n f e r e n c e · o n · g r e y · l i t e r a t u r e · a n d · r e p o s i t o r i e s · c o n f e r e n c e · o n · g r e y · l i t e r a t u r e · a n d · r e p o s i t o r i e s · c o n f e r e n c e · o n · g r e y · l i t e r a t u r e · a n d · r e p o s i t o r i e s · c o n f e r e n c e · o n · g r e y · l i t e r a t u r e · a n d · r e p o s i t o r i e s · c o n f e r e n c e · o n · g r e y · l i t e r a t u r e · a n d · r e p o s i t o r i e s · c o n f e r e n c e · o n · g r e y · l i t e r a t u r e · a n d · r e p o s i t o r i e s · c o n f e r e n c e · o n · g r e y · l i t e r a t u r e · a n d · r e p o s i t o r i e s · c o n f e r e n c e · o n · g r e y · l i t e r a t u r e · a n d · r e p o s i t o r i e s · c o n f e r e n c e · o n · g r e y · l i t e r a t u r e
    [Show full text]
  • Education and Academic Background Positions Honorary Administrative and Managerial Responsibilities Publications
    Bertil F. Dorch Library Director, University Library of Southern Denmark Associate Professor, Department of Physics, Chemistry and Pharmacy Postal address: Campusvej 55 DK-5230 Odense M Email: [email protected] Phone: 65502683 Education and academic background 1998 Ph.d.in Physics, University of Copenhagen 1995 Master's degree in Astronomy, University of Copenhagen 1993 Bachelor of Physics, University of Copenhagen Positions 2020- Associate Professor, Department of Physics, Chemistry and Pharmacy 2013- Head of Library, University Library of Southern Denmark 2012-2013 Senior Executive Adviser to the University Librarian, The Royal Library 2009-2012 Head of Center, Center for Scholarly Communication, The Royal Library 2008-2009 Head of Section, Faculty Library of Natural and Medicine, The Royal Library 2006-2011 Honorary associate professor, The Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen 2006-2008 Senior researcher, The Royal Library 2005-2007 Research Librarian, The Royal Library, Denmark 2003-2005 Steno Ass. Professor, The Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen 1999-2002 Postdoc, Institute for Solar Physics, The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences Honorary administrative and managerial responsibilities 2014-2020 President of Danish Research Library Association 2015-2016 Chairman of the Danish Library Directors' Conference 2014-2017 Member of Board at SPARC Europe Publications The Observatory Library at Østervold in Copenhagen, Denmark, 1861-1996 Dorch, B. F. & Petersen, J. O., 6. Aug 2021, (Submitted) In: Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage. 15 p. Serious play - Building a library strategy with Lego Wien, C. & Dorch, B. F., 26. May 2021, Proceedings of QQML 2021. The Para-Academic Industry and the Mayhem of Metrics Wien, C.
    [Show full text]
  • SEP-210148861 Proposal Acronym: Openaire2020
    European Commission - Research - Participants Proposal Submission Forms Horizon 2020 Call: H2020-EINFRA-2014-1 Topic: EINFRA-2-2014 Type of action: RIA Proposal number: SEP-210148861 Proposal acronym: OpenAIRE2020 Table of contents Section Title Action 1 General information 2 Participants & contacts 3 Budget 4 Ethics 5 Call-specific questions How to fill in the forms The administrative forms must be filled in for each proposal using the templates available in the submission system. Some data fields in the administrative forms are pre-filled based on the previous steps in the submission wizard. H2020-CP.pdf - Ver1.83 20140410 Page 1 of 162 Last saved 16/04/2014 at 04:04 European Commission - Research - Participants Proposal Submission Forms Proposal ID 643410 Acronym OpenAIRE2020 1 - General information Topic EINFRA-2-2014 Type of action RIA Call identifier H2020-EINFRA-2014-1 Acronym OpenAIRE2020 Proposal title* Open Access Infrastructure for Research in Europe 2020 Note that for technical reasons, the following characters are not accepted in the Proposal Title and will be removed: < > " & Duration in months 42 Fixed keyword 1 Open access Add Open Access Infrastructure, Research Information System, Monitoring Open Access Scientific Free keywords Outcomes, Gold Open Access Pilot Abstract OpenAIRE2020 represents a pivotal phase in the long-term effort to implement and strengthen the impact of the Open Access (OA) policies of the European Commission (EC), building on the achievements of the OpenAIRE projects. OpenAIRE2020 will expand and leverage its focus from (1) the agents and resources of scholarly communication to workflows and processes, (2) from publications to data, software, and other research outputs, and the links between them, and (3) strengthen the relationship of European OA infrastructures with other regions of the world, in particular Latin America and the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Open Access in Practice – Results and Recommendations from the Danish Project (2017-2018)
    Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: May 04, 2019 Green Open Access in Practice – results and recommendations from the Danish project (2017-2018) Sand, Ane Ahrenkiel; Schneider, Anette Wergeland Publication date: 2019 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link back to DTU Orbit Citation (APA): Sand, A. A. (Author), & Schneider, A. W. (Author). (2019). Green Open Access in Practice – results and recommendations from the Danish project (2017-2018). Sound/Visual production (digital), Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark: Technical University of Denmark. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. GREEN OPEN ACCESS IN PRACTICE – results and recommendations from the Danish project (2017-2018) ANE AHRENKIEL SAND and ANETTE WERGELAND SCHNEIDER EMBARGO UKSG 42nd Annual Conference and Exhibition: Telford, UK PERMITTED ADDITIONAL OPEN ACCESS ISSUES DATE: April 08 2019–April 10 2019 VERSIONS SYSTEM PUBLISHER INFRA- PRACTICES STRUCTURE THE RIGHTS AND WORKFLOW LICENSES OF RESEARCHERS 10.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comprehensive Analysis of Publications by Finnish Researchers
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Open access at the national level: A comprehensive analysis of publications by Finnish researchers Janne Pölönen1 , Mikael Laakso2 , Raf Guns3 , Emanuel Kulczycki4 , and Gunnar Sivertsen5 an open access journal 1Federation of Finnish Learned Societies, Snellmaninkatu 13, 00170 Helsinki (Finland) 2Hanken School of Economics, Information Systems Science, Arkadiankatu 22, 00100, Helsinki (Finland) 3University of Antwerp, Faculty of Social Sciences, Centre for R&D Monitoring (ECOOM), Middelheimlaan 1, 2020 Antwerp (Belgium) 4Adam Mickiewicz University, Scholarly Communication Research Group, Szamarzewskiego 89c, 60-568 Poznan (Poland) 5Nordic Institute for Studies in Innovation, Research and Education (NIFU), P.O. Box 2815,0608 Tøyen, Oslo (Norway) Citation: Pölönen, J., Laakso, M., Guns, R., Kulczycki, E., & Sivertsen, G. (2020). Keywords: bibliographic data, bibliometrics, data quality, open access, scholarly communication, Open access at the national level: A comprehensive analysis of science policy publications by Finnish researchers. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(4), 1396–1428. https://doi.org/10.1162 /qss_a_00084 ABSTRACT DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00084 Open access (OA) has mostly been studied by relying on publication data from selective international databases, notably Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus. The aim of our study is to Received: 25 October 2019 Accepted: 02 August 2020 show that it is possible to achieve a national estimate of the number and share of OA based on institutional publication data providing a comprehensive coverage of the peer-reviewed Corresponding Author: Janne Pölönen outputs across fields, publication types, and languages. Our data consists of 48,177 journal, [email protected] conference, and book publications from 14 Finnish universities in 2016–2017, including Handling Editor: information about OA status, as self-reported by researchers and validated by data-collection Ludo Waltman personnel through their Current Research Information System (CRIS).
    [Show full text]
  • Management 11 (1): 81–95 81 Joanna Hetman-Krajewska
    Open Access to Scientific Works: Axiology, History and Chosen Aspects of Copyright Solutions joanna hetman-krajewska Polish Academy of Sciences [email protected] Problems concerning Open Access to human creative works, es- pecially scientific works is complex. Development of research and growing number of scholarly papers as well as other materials demand systemic solutions – both in national and international perspective. The article outlines legal and practical problems con- cerning Open Access to scientific works – the basic phenomenon tending to ensure free development of sciences in the context of local, European and international cooperation and progress. The author describes the history of Open Access movement, starting in the 1980s with the development of free software trend and fol- lowed by Creative Commons licensing solutions. The first decade of the new millennium has brought many great strides in popu- larization of Open Access. Many initiatives of this kind have ap- peared launched by various actors. The basic legal problems of Open Access are obtaining research materials to on-line reposi- tories and – on the other hand – liability of repository providers in the context of potential breaches of copyright. Key words: Open Access, Creative Commons, scientific works, copyright law Introduction The problem of Open Access to the scientific output is not only local, i.e. national, but also strictly international. The issue was expressed by the European Union – e.g. in its initiative Open Data Strategy announced on 12 December 2011 or in the programs openaire and openaireplus developing e-infrastructure for different dispersed repositories. Simultaneously,Open Access implementation is launch- ed on the non-government basis – there are disciplinary reposito- ries (arXiv, Social Science Research Network), research foundations (Wellcome Trust), as well as open and hybrid publishers (plos).
    [Show full text]