Meteorological Masts for a Potential Wind Farm in the Ml43 Mining Area, Namibia Namdeb

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Meteorological Masts for a Potential Wind Farm in the Ml43 Mining Area, Namibia Namdeb DRAFT SCOPING REPORT METEOROLOGICAL MASTS FOR A POTENTIAL WIND FARM IN THE ML43 MINING AREA, NAMIBIA NAMDEB Reference:Project number: 508965 508965 Oranjemund_Met_Masts_DRAFT_07052021.docx, 2021/05/072021/05/07 Revision 11 1 Revision: 1 Submission date: 2021/05/072021/05/07 Document control record Document prepared by: Zutari Namibia (Pty) Ltd Reg No 90/469 Unit 1 Mandela Offices, Cnr Nelson Mandela & Simon Bolivar Street, Klein Windhoek Namibia PO Box 5353, Ausspannplatz, Windhoek T +264 61 237 704 F +264 61 237 706 E [email protected] A person using Zutari documents or data accepts the risk of: ► Using the documents or data in electronic form without requesting and checking them for accuracy against the original hard copy version. ► Using the documents or data for any purpose not agreed to in writing by Zutari. Document Control Report title Draft Scoping Report: Meteorological Masts for the Oranjemund Wind Farm, Namibia Document code 12597 Project number 508965 Client NAMDEB Client contact Client reference Rev Date Revision details/status Author Reviewer Verifier Approver (if required) 0 2021/05/07 Draft Scoping Report Wynand Reuben Not Stephan van Loftus Heydenrych required den Berg 1 2021/05/07 Draft Scoping Report Wynand Reuben Not Stephan van addressing client comments Loftus Heydenrych required den Berg Current revision 1 Approval Author signature Approver signature Name Wynand Loftus Name Stephan van den Berg Title Senior Consultant Title Technical Director Project number: 508965 Oranjemund_Met_Masts_DRAFT_07052021.docx, 2021/05/07 Revision 1 2 Contents 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................8 1.1 Background ....................................................................................................................8 1.2 Project Role Players .......................................................................................................8 1.2.1 Proponent ........................................................................................................8 1.2.2 Environmental Assessment Practitioner .........................................................8 1.2.3 Specialists .......................................................................................................9 1.2.4 Interested and Affected Parties .......................................................................9 1.2.5 Competent Authority ........................................................................................9 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................... 10 2.1 Project Location ........................................................................................................... 10 2.2 Wind Resource ............................................................................................................ 13 2.3 Proposed Meteorological Masts .................................................................................. 14 3 LEGISLATIVE CONTEXT ................................................................................................................ 16 3.1 National legislation ...................................................................................................... 16 3.2 Policies, Guidelines, Plans and Strategies .................................................................. 19 3.2.1 Namibia Vision 2030..................................................................................... 19 3.2.2 Namibia’s Second National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (2013- 2022) ............................................................................................................ 20 3.2.3 National Policy on Climate Change .............................................................. 20 3.2.4 National Energy Policy ................................................................................. 20 3.2.5 Company-specific Environmental Management Standards ......................... 20 4 NEED AND DESIRABILITY ............................................................................................................. 21 4.1 Energy in Namibia ....................................................................................................... 21 4.2 Namdeb’s Strategy to Reduce its Carbon Footprint .................................................... 22 4.3 Strategic Context ......................................................................................................... 22 5 ALTERNATIVES .............................................................................................................................. 26 5.1 Location alternatives.................................................................................................... 26 5.2 Type of activity to be undertaken ................................................................................ 26 5.3 The design or layout of the activity .............................................................................. 26 5.4 The technology to be used in the activity .................................................................... 26 5.5 Operational aspects of the activity .............................................................................. 27 5.6 The No-Go Alternative ................................................................................................. 27 6 DESCRIPTION OF AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT ........................................................................... 28 6.1 Land Use and Tsau //Khaeb (Sperrgebiet) National Park ........................................... 28 6.2 Infrastructure and Access ............................................................................................ 30 6.3 Climate ........................................................................................................................ 30 6.4 Topography, Soils and Hydrology ............................................................................... 30 6.5 Biodiversity .................................................................................................................. 30 6.5.1 Flora ............................................................................................................. 30 6.5.2 Tree and shrub diversity ............................................................................... 31 6.5.3 Grass diversity .............................................................................................. 31 6.5.4 Vertebrate fauna ........................................................................................... 31 6.5.5 Reptile diversity ............................................................................................ 32 6.5.6 Amphibian diversity ...................................................................................... 32 6.5.7 Mammal diversity .......................................................................................... 32 Project number: 508965 Oranjemund_Met_Masts_DRAFT_07052021.docx, 2021/05/07 Revision 1 3 6.5.8 Avian diversity .............................................................................................. 32 6.6 Heritage ....................................................................................................................... 34 6.6.1 Related archaeological and historical information ........................................ 34 6.6.2 Buried sites ................................................................................................... 35 6.6.3 Flooded sites ................................................................................................ 35 6.6.4 Fossilized sites ............................................................................................. 35 6.6.5 Implications ................................................................................................... 36 7 IDENTIFIED IMPACTS AND PROVISIONAL ASSESSMENTS ..................................................... 37 7.1 Biodiversity impacts ..................................................................................................... 37 7.1.1 Impacts on avifauna ..................................................................................... 37 7.1.2 Impacts on other vertebrate fauna (amphibians, mammals, and reptiles) ... 39 7.1.3 Impacts on flora ............................................................................................ 41 7.2 Heritage impacts .......................................................................................................... 43 7.2.1 Sensitivity to disturbance .............................................................................. 43 7.2.2 Disturbance during the construction and operation phase ........................... 44 7.2.3 Disturbance in other areas ........................................................................... 44 7.2.4 Recommendations for mitigation measures and monitoring ........................ 44 8 TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT ..................... 45 8.1 Tasks to be Undertaken as Part of the Assessment Process ..................................... 45 8.2 Consultation with the Environmental Commissioner ................................................... 46 8.3 Assessment Methodology ........................................................................................... 46 8.4 Calculations ................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Freshwater Fishes
    WESTERN CAPE PROVINCE state oF BIODIVERSITY 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 Introduction 2 Chapter 2 Methods 17 Chapter 3 Freshwater fishes 18 Chapter 4 Amphibians 36 Chapter 5 Reptiles 55 Chapter 6 Mammals 75 Chapter 7 Avifauna 89 Chapter 8 Flora & Vegetation 112 Chapter 9 Land and Protected Areas 139 Chapter 10 Status of River Health 159 Cover page photographs by Andrew Turner (CapeNature), Roger Bills (SAIAB) & Wicus Leeuwner. ISBN 978-0-620-39289-1 SCIENTIFIC SERVICES 2 Western Cape Province State of Biodiversity 2007 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Andrew Turner [email protected] 1 “We live at a historic moment, a time in which the world’s biological diversity is being rapidly destroyed. The present geological period has more species than any other, yet the current rate of extinction of species is greater now than at any time in the past. Ecosystems and communities are being degraded and destroyed, and species are being driven to extinction. The species that persist are losing genetic variation as the number of individuals in populations shrinks, unique populations and subspecies are destroyed, and remaining populations become increasingly isolated from one another. The cause of this loss of biological diversity at all levels is the range of human activity that alters and destroys natural habitats to suit human needs.” (Primack, 2002). CapeNature launched its State of Biodiversity Programme (SoBP) to assess and monitor the state of biodiversity in the Western Cape in 1999. This programme delivered its first report in 2002 and these reports are updated every five years. The current report (2007) reports on the changes to the state of vertebrate biodiversity and land under conservation usage.
    [Show full text]
  • Plethora of Plants - Collections of the Botanical Garden, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb (2): Glasshouse Succulents
    NAT. CROAT. VOL. 27 No 2 407-420* ZAGREB December 31, 2018 professional paper/stručni članak – museum collections/muzejske zbirke DOI 10.20302/NC.2018.27.28 PLETHORA OF PLANTS - COLLECTIONS OF THE BOTANICAL GARDEN, FACULTY OF SCIENCE, UNIVERSITY OF ZAGREB (2): GLASSHOUSE SUCCULENTS Dubravka Sandev, Darko Mihelj & Sanja Kovačić Botanical Garden, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Marulićev trg 9a, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia (e-mail: [email protected]) Sandev, D., Mihelj, D. & Kovačić, S.: Plethora of plants – collections of the Botanical Garden, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb (2): Glasshouse succulents. Nat. Croat. Vol. 27, No. 2, 407- 420*, 2018, Zagreb. In this paper, the plant lists of glasshouse succulents grown in the Botanical Garden from 1895 to 2017 are studied. Synonymy, nomenclature and origin of plant material were sorted. The lists of species grown in the last 122 years are constructed in such a way as to show that throughout that period at least 1423 taxa of succulent plants from 254 genera and 17 families inhabited the Garden’s cold glass- house collection. Key words: Zagreb Botanical Garden, Faculty of Science, historic plant collections, succulent col- lection Sandev, D., Mihelj, D. & Kovačić, S.: Obilje bilja – zbirke Botaničkoga vrta Prirodoslovno- matematičkog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Zagrebu (2): Stakleničke mesnatice. Nat. Croat. Vol. 27, No. 2, 407-420*, 2018, Zagreb. U ovom članku sastavljeni su popisi stakleničkih mesnatica uzgajanih u Botaničkom vrtu zagrebačkog Prirodoslovno-matematičkog fakulteta između 1895. i 2017. Uređena je sinonimka i no- menklatura te istraženo podrijetlo biljnog materijala. Rezultati pokazuju kako je tijekom 122 godine kroz zbirku mesnatica hladnog staklenika prošlo najmanje 1423 svojti iz 254 rodova i 17 porodica.
    [Show full text]
  • Reptiles and Amphibians of the Goegap Nature Reserve
    their time underground in burrows. These amphibians often leave their burrows after heavy rains that are seldom. Reptiles And Amphibians Of The There are reptiles included in this report, which don’t occur here in Goegap but at the Augrabies Falls NP. So you can find here also the Nile monitor and the flat liz- Goegap Nature Reserve ard. Measuring reptiles By Tanja Mahnkopf In tortoises and terrapins the length is measured at the shell. Straight along the mid- line of the carapace. The SV-Length is the length of head and body (Snout to Vent). In lizards it easier to look for this length because their tail may be a regenerated one Introduction and these are often shorter than the original one. The length that is mentioned for the The reptiles are an ancient class on earth. The earliest reptile fossils are about 315 species in this report is the average to the maximum length. For the snakes I tried to million years old. During the aeons of time they evolved a great diversity of extinct give the total length because it is often impossible to say where the tail begins and and living reptiles. The dinosaurs and their relatives dominated the earth 150 million the body ends without holding the snake. But there was not for every snake a total years ago. Our living reptiles are remnants of that period or from a period after the length available. dinosaurs were extinct. Except of the chameleons (there are only two) you can find all reptiles in the appen- Obviously it looks like reptiles are not as successful as mammals.
    [Show full text]
  • Lithops Scrapbook: Part 1’, Comment on ‘Data on Lithops Cultivar Names’, Cactus World, Formosa, V
    Painting of L. julii subsp. fulleri var. brunnea © Jim Porter and reproduced with kind permission. Brief additional notes to the Cole Lithops monographs by Keith Green. Introduction An abridged version of these notes was published over three issues by the BRITISH CACTUS AND SUCCULENT SOCIETY in their journal CACTUS WORLD, in December 2007, March 2008 and June 2008. This is the complete, unedited project. The following notes evolved from my intention to provide an update (without any duplication) to Professor DESMOND T. COLE’s original Lithops monograph - LITHOPS FLOWERING STONES, published in Randburg, Republic of South Africa by Acorn Books in 1988. An attempt was made to briefly document all of the subsequent discoveries within the genus, with emphasis on the originating source. I gave consideration to every “new” Lithops I saw mentioned (the vast majority of which were termed cultivars) and documented, further researched and where possible obtained photographs of those I considered worthy of the rank afforded them. Over the years I therefore amassed quite a reasonable number of entries. Early in 2003 I learned through the pages of the M.S.G. Bulletin that Professor Cole was going to update his work and have a second edition Lithops monograph published. Subsequently I was able to make contact with Professor Cole, and I sent him a rough copy of these (then embryonic) notes hoping that they would be of some assistance to him in compiling his new book. Although he and Naureen kindly mention my help on p. 11 of ‘Cole’05’, I learnt a great deal more from the Coles’ than they could ever have learnt from me! Professor Cole’s reply (which included some Lithops seed) was most informative.
    [Show full text]
  • Mr R HEYDENRYCH
    Curriculum vitae: Mr R HEYDENRYCH Name : HEYDENRYCH, REUBEN Date of Birth : 27 October 1969 Profession/Specialisation : Environmental management Years with Firm : 8 Nationality : South African Years experience : 26 Key qualifications Reuben is employed as an environmental assessment practitioner at Aurecon. He has extensive experience in the project management of various small and large-scale infrastructural and environmental projects. He has been involved in environmental impact assessment (EIA) and planning processes in South Africa, Botswana, Kenya, Lesotho, Mozambique, Namibia, Rwanda, Tanzania, Uganda, Zimbabwe, Zambia and Antarctica, as required by relevant national legislation, financial institution performance standards and in terms of international requirements as EIA team leader and team member. These projects have included basic assessments and EIAs for projects as diverse as fuel storage facilities, mines, industrial developments, telecommunications, power generation (solar, wind, hydro, coal and nuclear), power transmission/distribution projects, water and sewage infrastructure, transport (airports, rail and roads), residential developments and game lodges. Many of these were completed to lender safeguard requirements, including the European Investment Bank, IFC, AfDB and Equator Principles. Reuben also has experience in environmental advisory services and strategic environmental management, including strategic environmental assessments (SEAs), environmental scans, environmental feasibility studies and environmental management frameworks (EMFs); environmental management programmes (EMPRs) for the construction and operational phases of infrastructure developments and environmental auditing, including due diligence assessments, ISO 14001 systems development and auditing, legal compliance and waste management audits. He obtained a Master's degree in Philosophy: Environmental Management from the University of Cape Town (UCT), South Africa in 1993 and a Bachelors' degree in Landscape Architecture from the University of Pretoria, South Africa, in 1991.
    [Show full text]
  • Lithops Flowering Stones Pdf
    Lithops flowering stones pdf Continue Lithops Blossom Stones Desmond T Cole and Naureen A.Cole 261 pages, hardback, ISBN 88-900511-7-5 (First pubished in csSA Journal and reprinted in the Mesemb Study Group Newsletter.) When first published in 1988 Lithops Flowering Stones was widely recognized as a unique fine achievement. It was soon sold out, making this new enlarged and relatively inexpensive version even more desirable. Note the co-authorship: the irreplaceable Naurin Cole finally appears on the front page with her more public husband. Seventeen years is a long time in botanical life, but there was relatively little to renew; only three previously unknown species came to light. Two of them are included here, reports of the fourth and fifth being vague as models of the third, the enigmatic little Namibian, who appeared too late for inclusion in this book. Otherwise the perfectly polished text is worth as it was, with little tweaks here and there. I only want the book to be expanded to include old Cole essays published in magazines now hard to obtain. Many of them have clarified the mysteries left by G.K. Ell, the chaotically astute author of the first full-scale work on Lithops. The essays are reflected, but not necessarily summarized in the texts of 1988 and 2005. Physically, the new edition is a big improvement over its predecessor. It has grown twice as much, mainly due to the fascinating addition of habitat photos for each species and all but two subspecies. Unusually, lithops are an expression of specific niches - those who doubt that Desmond Cole's images of L.comptonii var should be tested.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist and Provisional Conservation Status of Namibian Reptiles
    Annotated Checklist - Reptiles Page 1 ANNOTATED CHECKLIST AND PROVISIONAL CONSERVATION STATUS OF NAMIBIAN REPTILES MICHAEL GRIFFIN BIODIVERSITY INVENTORY MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND TOURISM PRIVATE BAG 13306 WINDHOEK NAMIBIA Annotated Checklist - Reptiles Page 2 Annotated Checklist - Reptiles Page 3 CONTENTS PAGE ABSTRACT 5 INTRODUCTION 5 METHODS AND DEFINITIONS 6 SPECIES ACCOUNTS Genus Crocodylus Nile Crocodile 11 Pelomedusa Helmeted Terrapin 11 Pelusios Hinged Terrapins 12 Geochelone Leopard Tortoise 13 Chersina Bowsprit Tortoise 14 Homopus Nama Padloper 14 Psammobates Tent Tortoises 15 Kinixys Hinged Tortoises 16 Chelonia GreenTurtle 16 Lepidochelys Olive Ridley Turtle 17 Dermochelys Leatherback Turtle 17 Trionyx African Soft-shelled Turtle 18 Afroedura Flat Geckos 19 Goggia Dwarf Leaf-toed Geckos 20 Afrogecko Marbled Leaf-toed Gecko 21 Phelsuma Namaqua Day Gecko 22 Lygodactylus Dwarf Geckos 23 Rhoptropus Namib Day Geckos 25 Chondrodactylus Giant Ground Gecko 27 Colopus Kalahari Ground Gecko 28 Palmatogecko Web-footed Geckos 28 Pachydactylus Thick-toed Geckos 29 Ptenopus Barking Geckos 39 Narudasia Festive Gecko 41 Hemidactylus Tropical House Geckos 41 Agama Ground Agamas 42 Acanthocercus Tree Agama 45 Bradypodion Dwarf Chameleons 46 Chamaeleo Chameleons 47 Acontias Legless Skinks 48 Typhlosaurus Blind Legless Skinks 48 Sepsina Burrowing Skinks 50 Scelotes Namibian Dwarf Burrowing Skink 51 Typhlacontias Western Burrowing Skinks 51 Lygosoma Sundevall’s Writhing Skink 53 Mabuya Typical Skinks 53 Panaspis Snake-eyed Skinks 60 Annotated
    [Show full text]
  • A Phylogeny and Revised Classification of Squamata, Including 4161 Species of Lizards and Snakes
    BMC Evolutionary Biology This Provisional PDF corresponds to the article as it appeared upon acceptance. Fully formatted PDF and full text (HTML) versions will be made available soon. A phylogeny and revised classification of Squamata, including 4161 species of lizards and snakes BMC Evolutionary Biology 2013, 13:93 doi:10.1186/1471-2148-13-93 Robert Alexander Pyron ([email protected]) Frank T Burbrink ([email protected]) John J Wiens ([email protected]) ISSN 1471-2148 Article type Research article Submission date 30 January 2013 Acceptance date 19 March 2013 Publication date 29 April 2013 Article URL http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/13/93 Like all articles in BMC journals, this peer-reviewed article can be downloaded, printed and distributed freely for any purposes (see copyright notice below). Articles in BMC journals are listed in PubMed and archived at PubMed Central. For information about publishing your research in BMC journals or any BioMed Central journal, go to http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/authors/ © 2013 Pyron et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. A phylogeny and revised classification of Squamata, including 4161 species of lizards and snakes Robert Alexander Pyron 1* * Corresponding author Email: [email protected] Frank T Burbrink 2,3 Email: [email protected] John J Wiens 4 Email: [email protected] 1 Department of Biological Sciences, The George Washington University, 2023 G St.
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns of Species Richness, Endemism and Environmental Gradients of African Reptiles
    Journal of Biogeography (J. Biogeogr.) (2016) ORIGINAL Patterns of species richness, endemism ARTICLE and environmental gradients of African reptiles Amir Lewin1*, Anat Feldman1, Aaron M. Bauer2, Jonathan Belmaker1, Donald G. Broadley3†, Laurent Chirio4, Yuval Itescu1, Matthew LeBreton5, Erez Maza1, Danny Meirte6, Zoltan T. Nagy7, Maria Novosolov1, Uri Roll8, 1 9 1 1 Oliver Tallowin , Jean-Francßois Trape , Enav Vidan and Shai Meiri 1Department of Zoology, Tel Aviv University, ABSTRACT 6997801 Tel Aviv, Israel, 2Department of Aim To map and assess the richness patterns of reptiles (and included groups: Biology, Villanova University, Villanova PA 3 amphisbaenians, crocodiles, lizards, snakes and turtles) in Africa, quantify the 19085, USA, Natural History Museum of Zimbabwe, PO Box 240, Bulawayo, overlap in species richness of reptiles (and included groups) with the other ter- Zimbabwe, 4Museum National d’Histoire restrial vertebrate classes, investigate the environmental correlates underlying Naturelle, Department Systematique et these patterns, and evaluate the role of range size on richness patterns. Evolution (Reptiles), ISYEB (Institut Location Africa. Systematique, Evolution, Biodiversite, UMR 7205 CNRS/EPHE/MNHN), Paris, France, Methods We assembled a data set of distributions of all African reptile spe- 5Mosaic, (Environment, Health, Data, cies. We tested the spatial congruence of reptile richness with that of amphib- Technology), BP 35322 Yaounde, Cameroon, ians, birds and mammals. We further tested the relative importance of 6Department of African Biology, Royal temperature, precipitation, elevation range and net primary productivity for Museum for Central Africa, 3080 Tervuren, species richness over two spatial scales (ecoregions and 1° grids). We arranged Belgium, 7Royal Belgian Institute of Natural reptile and vertebrate groups into range-size quartiles in order to evaluate the Sciences, OD Taxonomy and Phylogeny, role of range size in producing richness patterns.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae: Mr R HEYDENRYCH
    Curriculum vitae: Mr R HEYDENRYCH Name : HEYDENRYCH, REUBEN Date of Birth : 27 October 1969 Profession/Specialisation : Environmental Management Years with Firm : 5 Nationality : South African Years experience : 23 Key qualifications Reuben is employed as an environmental assessment practitioner in Aurecon's Tshwane office. He has extensive experience in the project management of various small and large-scale infrastructural and environmental projects. He has been involved in environmental impact assessment (EIA) processes in South Africa and in various other African countries, as required by relevant national legislation and in terms of international requirements as EIA team leader and team member. These projects have included exemptions, scoping, and full EIAs for projects such as rezoning, filling stations, water and sewage pipelines, roads (national, provincial and municipal), residential developments, game lodges, telecommunications structures, mines, infrastructure in sensitive environments and industrial processes. Reuben also has experience in environmental advisory services and strategic environmental management, including strategic environmental assessments (SEAs), environmental scans, environmental feasibility studies and environmental management frameworks (EMFs); environmental management programmes (EMPRs) for the construction and operational phases of infrastructure developments and environmental auditing, including due diligence assessments, ISO 14001 systems development and auditing, legal compliance and waste management
    [Show full text]
  • Key to the Species Accounts
    Key to the species accounts Species and infraspecific taxa are arranged alphabetically by family, genus, and species to facilitate easy lookup. Where available, synonyms are also included. Note that families are listed alphabetically, regardless of whether they are dicotyle- dons or monocotyledons. Endemic and protected species are identified by the following icons: C1 CITES Appendix I C2 CITES Appendix II E Endemic taxon P Protected under Nature Conservation Ordinance 4 of 1975 Status The conservation status is indicated by the following abbreviations: CR Critically Endangered EN Endangered LC Least Concern NT Near Threatened R Rare VU Vulnerable Description Description of the growth form and major distinguishing characters of each taxon. Rationale Brief explanation of the reasons for listing and the factors that contributed to a particular assessment. Habitat Short description of habitat and altitude (in metres) where taxon may be expected to occur. Threats List of the main factors that threaten the taxon with extinction in Namibia. Additional notes Other important information. Where available, common names are included in this section. Red Data Book of Namibian Plants i Red Data Book of Namibian Plants Sonja Loots 2005 Southern African Botanical Diversity Network Report No. 38 ii Red Data Book of Namibian Plants Citation LOOTS S. 2005. Red Data Book of Namibian plants. Southern African Botanical Diversity Network Report No. 38. SABONET, Pretoria and Windhoek. Address for Correspondence National Botanical Research Institute Private Bag 13184 Windhoek NAMIBIA Tel: +264 61 2022013 Fax: +264 61 258153 E-mail: [email protected] Issued by The Project Coordinator Southern African Botanical Diversity Network c/o National Botanical Institute Private Bag X101 Pretoria 0001 SOUTH AFRICA Printed in 2005 in the Republic of South Africa by Capture Press, Pretoria, (27) 12 349-1802 ISBN 1-919976-16-7 © SABONET.
    [Show full text]
  • November 2016
    BCSS Southampton & District Branch November 2016 Newsletter Branch Secretary Newsletter EditorPage 1 British Cactus & Succulent Society David Neville Vinay Shah 6 Parkville Road 29 Heathlands Road Swaythling Eastleigh Southampton & District Branch Southampton Hampshire Newsletter Hampshire SO53 1GU SO16 2JA [email protected] [email protected] November 2016 (023) 80551173 or (023) 80261989 07974 191354 Editorial ........................................................... 1 Next month is our AGM followed by a Christmas Announcements ............................................... 1 social – as usual, the branch will supply drinks, but Last Month’s Meeting ..................................... 1 we would appreciate people bringing along a Table Show Results .............................................. 8 variety of food to share with everyone. Please Books and things ............................................. 8 discuss with Glenn Finn. Also note that there will be New books in the library ....................................... 9 no bran tub this year. Read All About It! .............................................. 10 Branch Committee Meeting ......................... 10 For branch committee members, I will want to publish your annual reports in next month’s Next Month’s Meeting .................................. 10 newsletter – so please send me your write ups Forthcoming Events ...................................... 10 sometime in November! Editorial Last Month’s Meeting Our clocks changed at the weekend and now it’s dark at 5pm! I expect we will get to feel a frost quite soon. I may give the plants one last drink for the Mesembryanthemums year, but that will depend on temperatures over the coming days. A few mesembs and Aloes are in Terry Smale apologised for not having many flower at the moment, and I also have a Clivia mesembs amongst his sale plants - many of them caulescens which flowers at this time of the year.
    [Show full text]