DOCSLIB.ORG

Soil Survey of Halifax County, North Carolina

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Soil Survey of Halifax County, North Carolina United States In cooperation with Department of North Carolina Department Agriculture of Environment and Soil Survey of Natural Resources, North Carolina Agricultural Halifax County, Research Service, North Carolina Cooperative Natural Extension Service, Fishing North Carolina Resources Creek Soil and Water Conservation Conservation District, and Service Halifax County Board of Commissioners 3 How to Use This Soil Survey General Soil Map The general soil map, which is the color map preceding the detailed soil maps, shows the survey area divided into groups of associated soils called general soil map units. This map is useful in planning the use and management of large areas. To find information about your area of interest, locate that area on the map, identify the name of the map unit in the area on the color-coded map legend, then refer to the section General Soil Map Units for a general description of the soils in your area. Detailed Soil Maps The detailed soil maps follow the general soil map. These maps can be useful in planning the use and management of small areas. To find information about your area of interest, locate that area on the Index to Map Sheets, which precedes the soil maps. Note the number of the map sheet and turn to that sheet. Locate your area of interest on the map sheet. Note the map units symbols that are in that area. Turn to the Contents, which lists the map units by symbol and name and shows the page where each map unit is described. The Contents shows which table has data on a specific land use for each detailed soil map unit. Also see the Contents for sections of this publication that may address your specific needs. 4 This soil survey is a publication of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the North Carolina Agricultural Research Service, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey. Major fieldwork for this soil survey was completed in 1993. Soil names and descriptions were approved in 1993. Unless otherwise indicated, statements in this publication refer to conditions in the survey area in 1993. This soil survey was made cooperatively by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, the North Carolina Agricultural Research Service, the North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service, the Fishing Creek Soil and Water Conservation District, and the Halifax County Board of Commissioners. It is part of the technical assistance furnished to the Fishing Creek Soil and Water Conservation District. The Halifax County Board of Commissioners provided financial assistance for the survey, and the Fishing Creek Soil and Water Conservation District provided clerical assistance. Soil maps in this survey may be copied without permission. Enlargement of these maps, however, could cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping. If enlarged, maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a larger scale. The first soil survey of Halifax County was published in 1918 by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (8). This survey updates the first survey, provides more detailed maps on aerial photographs, and contains more interpretive information. All programs and services of the Natural Resources Conservation Service are offered on a nondiscriminatory basis, without regard to race, color, national origin, religion, sex, age, marital status, or handicap. Cover: Cotton on Emporia fine sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes. Cotton is an important crop in Halifax County. Additional information about the Nation’s natural resources is available on the Natural Resources Conservation Service home page on the World Wide Web. The address is http://www.nrcs.usda.gov (click on “Technical Resources”). 5 Contents Cover ....................................................................... 1 ErB—Emporia-Urban land complex, 0 to 6 How to Use This Soil Survey ................................. 3 percent slopes ............................................. 38 Contents.................................................................. 5 EwB—Emporia-Wedowee complex, 2 to 6 Foreword ................................................................. 9 percent slopes ............................................. 39 General Nature of the County ................................ 11 ExA—Exum silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes ...... 40 How This Survey Was Made................................... 14 FuB—Fuquay sand, 0 to 4 percent slopes ......... 41 General Soil Map Units ........................................ 17 GoA—Goldsboro fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 1. Wedowee-Pacolet ........................................ 17 percent slopes ............................................. 42 2. Tatum-Herndon ............................................ 17 GrA—Grantham loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes ..... 43 3. Wedowee-Emporia ...................................... 18 GtB—Gritney fine sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent 4. Dothan-Fuquay ............................................ 18 slopes .......................................................... 44 5. Emporia-Goldsboro-Gritney ......................... 19 GtC—Gritney fine sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent 6. Grantham-Exum .......................................... 20 slopes .......................................................... 44 7. Noboco-Goldsboro-Gritney .......................... 20 GyB2—Gritney sandy clay loam, 2 to 6 percent 8. Roanoke-Dogue........................................... 21 slopes, eroded ............................................. 45 9. State-Altavista ............................................. 22 HeA—Helena sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent 10. Chewacla-Riverview .................................. 22 slopes .......................................................... 46 11. Chastain-Bibb ............................................ 22 HrB—Herndon silt loam, 2 to 6 percent Detailed Soil Map Units ....................................... 25 slopes .......................................................... 47 AaA—Altavista fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent HrC—Herndon silt loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes, rarely flooded ................................... 25 slopes .......................................................... 48 AyA—Aycock silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes .... 26 LgA—Lignum silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes .... 49 BaA—Bethera loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes ........ 28 LyA—Lynchburg fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 BcA—Bojac loamy fine sand, 0 to 3 percent percent slopes ............................................. 49 slopes .......................................................... 28 MrA—Marlboro fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent BoB—Bonneau loamy fine sand, 0 to 4 percent slopes .......................................................... 50 slopes .......................................................... 29 MrB—Marlboro fine sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent CbA—Chastain and Bibb soils, 0 to 1 percent slopes .......................................................... 51 slopes, frequently flooded ............................ 30 NaA—Nahunta silt loam, 0 to 2 percent ChA—Chewacla loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes, slopes .......................................................... 51 occasionally flooded .................................... 31 NkB—Nankin gravelly loamy sand, 1 to 6 CwA—Chewacla and Wehadkee soils, 0 to 1 percent slopes ............................................. 52 percent slopes, frequently flooded ............... 32 NoA—Noboco fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent DgA—Dogue silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes .... 33 slopes .......................................................... 54 DoA—Dothan loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent PaB—Pacolet sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes .......................................................... 34 slopes .......................................................... 55 DoB—Dothan loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent PeB2—Pacolet sandy clay loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes .......................................................... 34 slopes, eroded ............................................. 55 EmA—Emporia fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent RaA—Rains fine sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes .......................................................... 36 slopes .......................................................... 56 EmB—Emporia fine sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent RmA—Riverview loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes, slopes .......................................................... 37 occasionally flooded .................................... 57 EmC—Emporia fine sandy loam, 6 to 10 RoA—Roanoke loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, percent slopes ............................................. 38 occasionally flooded .................................... 57 6 SeA—Seabrook loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent Altavista Series ................................................ 104 slopes, rarely flooded ................................... 58 Aycock Series .................................................. 104 StA—State fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent Bethera Series ................................................. 105 slopes .......................................................... 59 Bibb Series ....................................................... 106 StB—State fine sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent Bojac Series ..................................................... 106 slopes .......................................................... 59 Bonneau Series
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Soil Survey of North Star Area, Alaska
    United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey of In cooperation with Fairbanks North Star Borough, Fairbanks and Salcha-Big Delta North Star Area, Soil and Water Conservation Districts, and University of Alaska Fairbanks Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station Alaska This soil survey is a publication of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and other Federal agencies, State agencies, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) (formerly the Soil Conservation Service) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey. Major fieldwork for this soil survey was completed in 1988. Soil names and descriptions were approved in 1989. Unless otherwise indicated, statements in this publication refer to conditions in the Survey Area in 1988. This survey was made cooperatively by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, the University of Alaska Fairbanks Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station, and the Fairbanks North Star Borough. The survey is part of the technical assistance furnished to the Fairbanks and Salcha-Big Delta Soil and Water Conservation District. Soil maps in this survey may be copied without permission. However, enlargement of these maps could cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping. If enlarged, maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a larger scale. USDA prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD).
    [Show full text]
  • The Black-Faced Spoonbill
    SAVE International the Black-faced Spoonbill The Black-faced Spoonbill (Platalea minor) DESCRIPTION Black-faced Spoonbills are long-legged, long-necked wading birds that resemble egrets. Their elegant feathers are snow white most of the year, but develop a shaggy, golden-yellow crest and breast patch in the summer breeding season. Their legs, feet and toes are jet-black; faces are black and bare around the FACTS eyes and across the forehead. Their black, Worldwide elongated beaks gradually narrow, status: then abruptly fl are out into a Endangered fl att ened disk with a Class: nail at the ti p. Aves CHARACTERISTICS Order: Ciconiiformes Length: 27-29 in (70-75 cm) Family: Weight: Unknown Threskiornithidae Clutch size: 3-5 eggs Subfamily: Incubati on: 21-25 days Plataleinae Diet: Small fi shes, crustaceans, insects, Genus / Species: mollusks, occasional plant material Platalea minor Habitat: Wetlands, marine estuaries Esti mated Range: Spoonbills breed in North Populati on: and South Korea, China and 2,300 Russia; and migrate to winter in Japan, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Vietnam, and the CURRENT STATUS Philippines. Black-faced Spoonbills are the rarest, and least- studied, spoonbills in the world. They have a global populati on of around 2,000. These birds nest on cliff s with gulls and other seabirds. The only known breeding colonies are on a few small, rocky islands off the coast of the Demilitarized Zone between North and South Korea and China; in the adjacent province of Liaoning in China; and at Furugelm Island (Russia). www.saveinternational.org [email protected] SAVE International the Black-faced Spoonbill The Facts The Plight of the Black-faced Spoonbills in South Korea • A proposed development in Incheon City, South Korea, threatens one of the last remaining pieces of habitat for the endangered Black-faced Spoonbill (Platalea minor) and other ti dal bird species.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 SOUTH KOREA 22 October – 3 November, 2018
    SOUTH KOREA 22 October – 3 November, 2018 Sandy Darling, Jeni Darling, Tom Thomas Most tours to South Korea occur in May for the spring migration or in late fall or winter for northern birds that winter in South Korea. This trip was timed in late October and early November to try see both summer residents and winter arrivals, and was successful in doing so. Birds were much shyer than in North America and often were visible only briefly, so that, for example, we saw few thrushes although they could be heard. This report has been written by Sandy and includes photos from both Tom (TT) and Sandy (SD). Sandy saw 166 species adequately of which 57 were life birds. When one includes birds heard, seen by the leader or others, or not seen well enough to count (BVD), the total was about 184. From trip reports it was clear that the person to lead the tour was Dr Nial Moores, Director of Birds Korea, an NGO working to improve the environment, especially for birds, in Korea. Nial has twenty years of experience in Korea, knows where birds are, and has ears and eyes that are exceptional. He planned the trip, made all the arrangements, found birds that we would not have found on our own and was our interface with Koreans, few of whom speak English. Nial also had to rejig the itinerary when strong winds led to the cancellation of a ferry to Baekryeong Island. We drove the vehicles - confidence was needed in dealing with city traffic, which was as aggressive as other trip reports said! Some of the highlights of the trip were: About 40,000 massed shore birds on Yubu Island, including the rare Spoonbill Sandpiper, a life bird for Tom.
    [Show full text]
  • Black-Faced Spoonbill, Spoon-Billed Sandpiper and Chinese Crested Tern
    Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals Secretariat provided by the United Nations Environment Programme 14 th MEETING OF THE CMS SCIENTIFIC COUNCIL Bonn, Germany, 14-17 March 2007 CMS/ScC14/Doc.16 Agenda item 5.1 PROGRESS REPORT ON THE INTERNATIONAL ACTION PLANS FOR THE CONSERVATION OF THE BLACK-FACED SPOONBILL ( PLATALEA MINOR ), SPOON-BILLED SANDPIPER ( EURYNORHYNCHUS PYGMEUS ), AND CHINESE CRESTED-TERN ( STERNA BERNSTEINI ) (Prepared by Mr. Simba Chan, BirdLife International Asia Division) I. Progress to March 2007 1. Preparation of the International Action Plans (IAP) for Black-faced Spoonbill, Chinese Crested-tern and Spoon-billed Sandpiper was unofficially started in late 2004, when BirdLife International Asia Division contacted experts on these species for their involvement in drafting the IAPs. As BirdLife International and its partners in Asia have been involved in conservation activities of Black-faced Spoonbill and Chinese Crested-tern, we believe it is best to have these two species IAP coordinated under BirdLife International Asia Division. On the IAP for Spoon- billed Sandpiper, BirdLife International approached the Shorebird Network of the Asia- Australasian Flyway for cooperation. They recommended Dr Christoph Zöckler, a Spoon-billed Sandpiper expert, to be the coordinator. BirdLife International had discussed with Dr Zöckler several times since 2004 and finally signed an agreement regarding the IAP after signing the Letter of Agreement with the CMS in early 2006. Black-faced Spoonbill Platalea minor 2. Drafting of the IAP for Black-faced Spoonbill goes on smoothly, with four working meetings between compilers who represent all major range countries (Japan, North Korea, South Korea, China including the island of Taiwan and the Hong Kong Special Administration Region) and workshop and symposia held in Tokyo, Tainan (Taiwan), Hong Kong and Ganghwa (South Korea): Tokyo, Japan : 2-6 October 2005 Meeting during the BirdLife Asia Council Meeting and a workshop at the Korea University, Tokyo.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Mountain Soils
    2015 In every mountain region, soils constitute the foundation for agriculture, supporting essential ecosystem functions and food security. Mountain soils benefit not only the 900 million people living in the world’s mountainous areas but also billions more living downstream. Soil is a fragile resource that needs time to regenerate. Mountain soils are particularly susceptible to climate change, deforestation, unsustainable farming practices and resource extraction methods that affect their fertility and trigger land degradation, desertification and disasters such as floods and landslides. Mountain peoples often have a deep-rooted connection to the soils they live on; it is a part of their heritage. Over the centuries, they have developed solutions and techniques, indigenous practices, knowledge and sustain- able soil management approaches which have proved to be a key to resilience. This publication, produced by the Mountain Partnership as a contribution to the International Year of Soils 2015, presents the main features of mountain soil systems, their environmental, economic and social values, the threats they are facing and the cultural traditions concerning them. Case studies provided by Mountain Partnership members and partners around the world showcase challenges and opportunities as well as lessons learned in soil management. This publication presents a series of lessons learned and recommendations to inform moun- Understanding Mountain soils tain communities, policy-makers, development experts and academics who support sustainable
    [Show full text]
  • Selected Records from Socheong Island, South Korea
    FORKTAIL 23 (2007): 102–124 Selected records from Socheong Island, South Korea NIAL MOORES Socheong Island, South Korea, is especially well positioned to provide valuable insights into bird migration and seabird status in both South Korea and the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea. Details are given of ornithologically significant records made on the island between October 2002 and October 2005, including six species recorded for the first time on the Korean peninsula: ‘Steppe’ Grey Shrike Lanius (meridionalis) pallidirostris, Chinese Thrush Turdus mupinensis, Yellow-bellied Tit Parus venustulus, Tickell’s Leaf Warbler Phylloscopus affinis, Chinese Leaf Warbler Phylloscopus yunnanensis and Scaly-breasted Munia Lonchura punctulata. INTRODUCTION 2002–October 2005, including the same species’ occurrence in open sea areas of Gyeonggi Bay, lying The Korean peninsula (= territory of the Republic of Korea between Socheong Island and Incheon Port. It omits or South Korea, and the Democratic People’s Republic of records at sea for species so far unrecorded from Socheong Korea, DPRK, combined, including marine areas and Island itself. islands) received relatively superficial ornithological Socheong Island is the southernmost and smallest of exploration until fairly recently, with the birds of DPRK three closely grouped, remote, South Korean islands in remaining particularly poorly known (Tomek 1999, 2002). the Yellow (or West) Sea, lying c.200 km west-north- Although recent observations have added several new west of Incheon city and mainland South Korea, 40 km species to the DPRK list (Duckworth 2004), and revised west and south of the mainland of Hwanghaenam the status of several dozen others (Duckworth 2006), there province, DPRK, and 200 km east-north-east of the is still very limited available information on the status of western tip of the Shandong peninsula, Shandong many species, especially in coastal and offshore areas.
    [Show full text]
  • (신광사 2차) Oiled Wildlife Response in the NOWPAP Region.Hwp
    1312-32, Yuseong-daero, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34103, Republic of Korea Korea Research Institute of Ships and Ocean Engineering (KRISO) Tel: (+82-42) 866-3638, FAX: (+82-42) 866-3630 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://merrac.nowpap.org Oiled wildlife response in the NOWPAP region Oiled wildlife response in the NOWPAP region 1312-32, Yuseong-daero, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34103, Republic of Korea Korea Research Institute of Ships & Ocean Engineering (KRISO) Tel: (+82-42) 866-3638, FAX: (+82-42) 866-3630 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://merrac.nowpap.org NOWPAP MERRAC 1312-32, Yuseong-daero, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34103, Republic of Korea Korea Research Institute of Ships and Ocean Engineering (KRISO) Tel: (+82-42) 866-3638, FAX: (+82-42) 866-3630 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://merrac.nowpap.org Oiled wildlife response in the NOWPAP region First Published in 2018 by Marine Environmental Emergency Preparedness and Response Regional Activity Centre the Northwest Pacific Action Plan (NOWPAP MERRAC) 1312-32, Yuseong-daero, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34103, Republic of Korea Korea Research Institute of Ships & Ocean Engineering (KRISO) Printed in Republic of Korea by Sinkwangsa ISBN 978-89-93604-40-5 Copyright © NOWPAP MERRAC 2018 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may, for sales purposes, be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, electrostatic, magnetic tape, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without prior permission in writing from the NOWPAP MERRAC. For bibliographical purposes this document may be cited as: MERRAC Technical Report No.
    [Show full text]
  • Adelaide International Bird Sanctuary Flyway Partnership Report
    Adelaide International Bird Sanctuary Flyway Partnership Report Report by The Nature Conservancy For the: Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources, South Australia 27 March 2018 The lead author of this document was David Mehlman of The Nature Conservancy’s Migratory Bird Program, with significant input, editing, and other assistance from James Fitzsimons and Anita Nedosyko of The Nature Conservancy’s Australia Program and Boze Hancock from The Nature Conservancy’s Global Oceans Team. Acknowledgements We thank the Government of South Australia, Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources, for funding this work under an agreement with The Nature Conservancy Australia. Helpful advice and comments on various aspects of this project were received from Mark Carey, Tony Flaherty, Rich Fuller, Michaela Heinson, Arkellah Irving, Jason Irving, Micha Jackson, Spike Millington, Chris Purnell, Phil Straw, Connie Warren, Doug Watkins, and Dan Weller. 2 Table of Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................................................ 4 List of Tables ................................................................................................................................................. 4 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 5 Overview of the Adelaide International Bird Sanctuary ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Experimental Forests and Ranges of the USDA Forest Service
    United States Department of Experimental Forests and Ranges Agriculture Forest Service of the USDA Forest Service Northeastern Research Station General Technical Report NE-321 Revised Abstract The USDA Forest Service has an outstanding scientific resource in the 79 Experimental Forests and Ranges that exist across the United States and its territories. These valuable scientific resources incorporate a broad range of climates, forest types, research emphases, and history. This publication describes each of the research sites within the Experimental Forests and Ranges network, providing information about history, climate, vegetation, soils, long-term data bases, research history and research products, as well as identifying collaborative opportunities, and providing contact information. The Compilers MARY BETH ADAMS, soil scientist, LINDA H. LOUGHRY, secretary, LINDA L. PLAUGHER, support services supervisor, USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station, Timber and Watershed Laboratory, Parsons, West Virginia. Manuscript received for publication 17 November 2003 Published by: For additional copies: USDA FOREST SERVICE USDA Forest Service 11 CAMPUS BLVD SUITE 200 Publications Distribution NEWTOWN SQUARE PA 19073-3294 359 Main Road September 2004 Delaware, OH 43015-8640 Revised March 2008 Fax: (740)368-0152 Revised publication available in CD-ROM only Visit our homepage at: http://www.nrs.fs.fed.us Experimental Forests and Ranges of the USDA Forest Service Compiled by: Mary Beth Adams Linda Loughry Linda Plaugher Contents Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • National Planning Tool for the Implementation of the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands
    National planning tool for the implementation of the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands (And the approved format for National Reports to be submitted for the 8th Meeting of the Conference of the Contracting Parties, Spain, 2002) file 1 Institutional information Contracting Party: THE REPUBLIC OF KOREA Full name of designated Ramsar Administrative Authority: Ministry of Environment (MOE) Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fishery (MOMAF) Name and title of the head of the designated Ramsar Administrative Authority: Mr. Jaeyoung KO Director General for International Cooperation Bureau Ministry of Environment Mailing address and contact details of the head of the institution: Global Environment Office, Ministry of Environment Government Complex-Kwachon, 1, Joongang-dong, Kwachon-city, Kyonggi-do, (427-729) The Republic of Korea Telephone: 82-2-504-9245 Facsimile: 82-2-504-9206 Email: [email protected] Name and title (if different) of the designated national focal point (or “daily contact” in the Administrative Authority) for Ramsar Convention matters: Mr. Heekyong NOH Deputy director, Global Environment Office Ministry of Environemnt Mailing address and contact details of the national focal point: Global Environment Office, Ministry of Environment Government Complex-Kwachon, 1, Joongang-dong, Kwachon-city, Kyonggi-do, (427-729) The Republic of Korea Telephone: 82-2-504-9245 Facsimile: 82-2-504-9206 Ramsar National Planning Tool, page 2 Email: [email protected] Name and title of the designated national focal point for matters relating to the Scientific and Technical Review Panel (STRP): Dr. Jinhan KIM Mailing address and contact details of the national STRP focal point: Wildlife Division, National Institute of Environmental Research, Kyungseo-dong, Seo-gu, Incheon-metropolis (404-170) The Republic of Korea Telephone: 82-32-560-7085 Facsimile: 82-32-560-7068 Email: [email protected] Name and title of the designated national government focal point for matters relating to the Outreach Programme of the Ramsar Convention: Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Birdlife Australia
    z BirdLife Australia BirdLife Australia (Royal Australasian Ornithologists Union) was founded in 1901 and works to conserve native birds and biological diversity in Australasia and Antarctica, through the study and management of birds and their habitats, and the education and involvement of the community. BirdLife Australia produces a range of publications, including Emu, a quarterly scientific journal; Wingspan, a quarterly magazine for all members; Conservation Statements; BirdLife Australia Monographs; the BirdLife Australia Report series; and the Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic Birds. It also maintains a comprehensive ornithological library and several scientific databases covering bird distribution and biology. Membership of BirdLife Australia is open to anyone interested in birds and their habitats, and concerned about the future of our avifauna. For further information about membership, subscriptions and database access, contact: BirdLife Australia Suite 2-05, 60 Leicester Street Carlton VIC 3053 Australia Tel: (Australia): (03) 9347 0757 Fax: (03) 9347 9323 (Overseas): +613 9347 0757 Fax: +613 9347 9323 E-mail: [email protected] © BirdLife Australia This report is copyright. Apart from any fair dealings for the purposes of private study, research, criticism, or review as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise without prior written permission. Enquires to BirdLife Australia. Recommended citation: Purnell, C., Crosby, M., Moon Y,. M. 2017. Conserving Shorebirds of the Geum Estuary: Year 1 Annual Report. BirdLife report to Woodside Energy. This report was prepared by BirdLife Australia with support from Woodside Energy Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • DPRK Wetland Project
    The Conservation and Wise Use of Wetlands in the DPR Korea People and animals benefit from the existence of wetlands. They play a critical role in the natural water cycle. However, they are endangered. In the Democratic People’s Republic (DPRK), an estimated 6% of all land are wetlands, an unique habitat for many species, from plants to animals like birds, fish and amphibians. Those habitats are threatened by over- exploitation, pollution, water withdrawal, and climate change. The DPRK tries to solve this problem. This project was designed to support the DPRK achieve its goals regarding the conservation of wetlands. build the knowledge and skills of decision makers, site managers and relevant persons support the identify the accession of the priority wetlands DPRK to the in the DPRK and Ramsar carry out projects Convention on at two of these Wetlands This sites Project aims to support the increase the development of a awareness at all National Wetland levels about the Action Plan for the importance of the DPRK wetlands update the inventory of wetlands in the DPRK ACTIVITIES National Workshops in Pyongyang 1st Workshop: The participants showed a high interest in the inclusion of the country into international agreements (like the Ramsar Convention) and into international organizations (like IUCN, the International Union for the Conservation of Nature). Outcomes of the workshop were a resolution to create a National Action Plan for the protection of wetlands, the identification of potential Ramsar sites, and capacity building for ministry officials and local officials. 2nd and 3rd Workshop: Latest information on the distribution, status, and value of the wetlands were collected.
    [Show full text]