DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Wildlife Conservation Plan for Seabirds

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Wildlife Conservation Plan for Seabirds DRAFT WILDLIFE CONSERVATION PLAN FOR SEABIRDS 1 The Species Profile and Threats Database pages linked to this recovery plan is obtainable from: http://www.environment.gov.au/cgi-bin/sprat/public/sprat.pl © Copyright Commonwealth of Australia, 2019. <insert name of report> is licensed by the Commonwealth of Australia for use under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence with the exception of the Coat of Arms of the Commonwealth of Australia, the logo of the agency responsible for publishing the report, content supplied by third parties, and any images depicting people. For licence conditions see: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This report should be attributed as ‘Draft Wildlife Conservation Plan for Seabirds, Commonwealth of Australia 2019’. The Commonwealth of Australia has made all reasonable efforts to identify content supplied by third parties using the following format ‘© Copyright, [name of third party] ’. Disclaimer While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure that the contents of this publication are factually correct, the Commonwealth does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the contents, and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of, or reliance on, the contents of this publication. Images credits Cover page: Red-footed Booby (Sula sula) over North Keeling Island © Copyright Department of the Environment and Energy 2 Contents Summary .............................................................................................................................. 7 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 7 Seabirds of Australia ............................................................................................................. 8 Legal framework ................................................................................................................. 13 Species covered under the wildlife conservation plan ......................................................... 17 Threats ............................................................................................................................... 19 Habitat Loss .................................................................................................................... 19 Habitat Modification ......................................................................................................... 20 Climate variability and change ......................................................................................... 20 Geological processes ...................................................................................................... 22 Invasive species .............................................................................................................. 23 Problem native wildlife ..................................................................................................... 24 Fisheries interactions and by-catch ................................................................................. 24 Prey depletion ................................................................................................................. 26 Resource extraction ......................................................................................................... 26 Renewable energy........................................................................................................... 27 Anthropogenic disturbance .............................................................................................. 27 Hunting ............................................................................................................................ 28 Transport ......................................................................................................................... 28 Drones............................................................................................................................. 29 Pollution .......................................................................................................................... 29 Aquaculture ..................................................................................................................... 34 Disease ........................................................................................................................... 34 Threat prioritisation .......................................................................................................... 35 Objectives ........................................................................................................................... 38 Actions to achieve the Specific Objectives .......................................................................... 38 Affected Interests ................................................................................................................ 42 Evaluating the Performance of the Plan .............................................................................. 44 Major benefits to other Migratory Species, Marine Species, Species oF Cetacean or Conservation Dependent Species ....................................................................................... 45 Species Profiles .................................................................................................................. 48 Red-tailed Tropicbird (Phaethon rubricauda) ................................................................... 48 White-tailed Tropicbird (Phaethon lepturus) ..................................................................... 49 Matsudaira’s Storm-petrel (Hydrobates matsudairae) ...................................................... 50 Swinhoe’s Storm-petrel (Hydrobates monorhis) ............................................................... 51 3 Wilson’s Storm-petrel (Oceanites oceanicus) .................................................................. 52 Grey-backed Storm-petrel (Garrodia nereis) .................................................................... 53 White-faced Storm-petrel (Pelagodroma marina) ............................................................. 54 Black-bellied Storm-petrel (Fregetta tropica).................................................................... 56 Cape Petrel (Daption capense)........................................................................................ 57 Broad-billed Prion (Pachyptila vittata) .............................................................................. 58 Salvin’s Prion (Pachyptila salvini) .................................................................................... 60 Antarctic Prion (Pachyptila desolata) ............................................................................... 61 Slender-billed Prion (Pachyptila belcheri) ........................................................................ 62 Fairy Prion (Pachyptila turtur) .......................................................................................... 63 Fulmar Prion (Pachyptila crassirostris) ............................................................................ 64 Bulwer’s Petrel (Bulweria bulwerii) ................................................................................... 65 Wedge-tailed Shearwater (Ardenna pacifica)................................................................... 67 Buller’s Shearwater (Ardenna bulleri) .............................................................................. 69 Flesh-footed Shearwater (Ardenna carneipes) ................................................................ 70 Sooty Shearwater (Ardenna grisea) ................................................................................. 73 Short-tailed Shearwater (Ardenna tenuirostris) ................................................................ 75 Streaked Shearwater (Calonectris leucomelas) ............................................................... 77 Fluttering Shearwater (Puffinus gavia) ............................................................................. 78 Hutton’s Shearwater (Puffinus huttoni) ............................................................................ 79 Little Shearwater (Puffinus assimilis) ............................................................................... 81 Tahiti Petrel (Pseudobulweria rostrata) ............................................................................ 83 Kerguelen Petrel (Lugensa brevirostris) ........................................................................... 85 White-headed Petrel (Pterodroma lessonii) ..................................................................... 86 Great-winged Petrel (Pterodroma macroptera) ................................................................ 87 Providence Petrel (Pterodroma solandri) ......................................................................... 89 Mottled Petrel (Pterodroma inexpectata) ......................................................................... 91 White-necked Petrel (Pterodroma cervicalis) ................................................................... 92 Black-winged Petrel (Pterodroma nigripennis) ................................................................. 94 Common Diving-petrel (Pelecanoides urinatrix) ............................................................... 96 South Georgian Diving-petrel (Pelecanoides georgicus) .................................................. 97 King Penguin (Aptenodytes
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Campbell Island Seabirds: Operation Endurance November 2019
    Rexer-Huber et al. 2020 Campbell seabirds Campbell Island seabirds: Operation Endurance November 2019 Kalinka Rexer-Huber, Kevin A. Parker, Graham C. Parker April 2020 Department of Conservation, Marine Species and Threats project BCBC 2019-03: Campbell Island Seabird Research 1 Rexer-Huber et al. 2020 Campbell seabirds Campbell Island seabirds: Operation Endurance November 2019 Final report to Department of Conservation, Marine Species and Threats April 2020 Kalinka Rexer-Huber 1*, Kevin A. Parker 2 & Graham C. Parker 1 1 Parker Conservation, 126 Maryhill Terrace, Dunedin, New Zealand 2 Parker Conservation, PO Box 130, Warkworth 0941, New Zealand * Corresponding author: [email protected] Please cite as: Rexer-Huber K., Parker K.A., Parker G.C. 2020. Campbell Island seabirds: Operation Endurance November 2019. Final report to Marine Species and Threats, Department of Conservation. Parker Conservation, Dunedin. 23 p. 2 Rexer-Huber et al. 2020 Campbell seabirds Summary Seabird population monitoring and survey on Campbell Island was enabled via Operation Endurance in November 2019. Specific objectives were to collect photo-point and ground-truthing data at Campbell and grey-headed albatross colonies, repeat whole-island counts of breeding Northern giant petrels, collect GLS trackers from Southern royal albatrosses, use sound recorders to record burrowing petrel distribution and check the bands of all banded birds seen. Photo-points for Campbell albatross and grey-headed albatross (Thalassarche impavida and T. chrysostoma) were revisited to take a new set of photographs for population monitoring. These photo-points have been used for counts since 1987, but some colonies have been photographed since the 1940s.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Cape Town
    The effects of introduced mice on seabirds breeding at sub-Antarctic Islands Ben J. Dilley Thesis presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Town FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology DST/NRF Centre of Excellence Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science University of CapeCape Town of June 2018 University Supervised by Professor Peter G. Ryan The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derivedTown from it is to be published without full acknowledgement of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes Capeonly. of Published by the University of Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. University Declaration This thesis reports original research that I conducted under the auspices of the FitzPatrick Institute, University of Cape Town. All assistance received has been fully acknowledged. This work has not been submitted in any form for a degree at another university. ………………….................. Ben J. Dilley Cape Town, June 2018 i A 10 day-old great shearwater Ardenna gravis chick being attacked by an invasive House mouse Mus musculus in an underground burrow on Gough Island in 2014 (photo Ben Dilley). ii Table of Contents Page Abstract ....................................................................................................................................... iv Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................................... vi Chapter 1 General introduction: Islands, mice and seabirds ......................................................... 1 Chapter 2 Clustered or dispersed: testing the effect of sampling strategy to census burrow-nesting petrels with varied distributions at sub-Antarctic Marion Island ...... 13 Chapter 3 Modest increases in densities of burrow-nesting petrels following the removal of cats Felis catus from sub-Antarctic Marion Island ...................................
    [Show full text]
  • Buller's Mollymawk Hooked on 13 July 1991, I Walked the Length of Papakanui Spit, South Kaipara Head, Looking for Fairy Terns
    344 SHORT NOTES NOTORNIS 38 LITERATURE CITED COOPER, W. J.; MISKELLY, C.M.; MORRISON, K.; PEACOCK, R. J. 1986. Birds of the Solander Islands. Notornis 33: 77-89. FALLA, R.A.; SIBSON, R.B.;TURBOTT, E.G. 1978. The New Guide to the Birds of New Zealand. Auckland: Collins. HARPER, P.C. 1976. The breeding biology of the Fairy Prion (Pachyptila ntriur) at the Poor Knights Islands, New Zealand. NZ J. Zool. 3: 351-371. HEATH, R.A. 1975. Oceanic circulation and hydrology off the southern half of South Island, New Zealand. NZ Oceanog. Inst. Memoir 72: 36pp. HOUTMAN, T. J. 1966. A note on the hydrological regime in Foveaux Strait. NZ J. Sci. 9: 472-483. JILLEm, J.B. 1969. Seasonal variability of waters off the Otago Peninsula, south-eastern New Zealand. NZ J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 3: 349-367. O'BRIEN, D.P. 1988. Surface schooling behaviour of the coastal krill Nyctiphanes ausnalis (Crustacea: Euphausiacea) off Tasmania, Australia. Mar. Ecology-Prog. Ser. 42: 219-233. RICHDALE, L.E. 1943. The Kuaka or Diving Petrel, Pelecamides urit~~trix(Gmelin). Emu 43: 24-48; 97-107. DAVID HAWKE, c/o 58 Evey Street, Dunedin * Buller's Mollymawk hooked On 13 July 1991, I walked the length of Papakanui Spit, South Kaipara Head, looking for Fairy Terns. On the way back I discovered a beached-wrecked mollymawk with about five metres of fishing line protruding from the bill. The hook was deeply embedded in the gut and the end of the line had been cut. I sent the bird to Graeme Taylor and Alan Tennyson, who confirmed the identification as Buller's Mollymawk (Diomedea bullen).
    [Show full text]
  • Pterodromarefs V1-5.Pdf
    Index The general order of species follows the International Ornithological Congress’ World Bird List. A few differences occur with regard to the number and treatment of subspecies where some are treated as full species. Version Version 1.5 (5 May 2011). Cover With thanks to Kieran Fahy and Dick Coombes for the cover images. Species Page No. Atlantic Petrel [Pterodroma incerta] 5 Barau's Petrel [Pterodroma baraui] 17 Bermuda Petrel [Pterodroma cahow] 11 Black-capped Petrel [Pterodroma hasitata] 12 Black-winged Petrel [Pterodroma nigripennis] 18 Bonin Petrel [Pterodroma hypoleuca] 19 Chatham Islands Petrel [Pterodroma axillaris] 19 Collared Petrel [Pterodroma brevipes] 20 Cook's Petrel [Pterodroma cookii] 20 De Filippi's Petrel [Pterodroma defilippiana] 20 Desertas Petrel [Pterodroma deserta] 11 Fea's Petrel [Pterodroma feae] 8 Galapágos Petrel [Pterodroma phaeopygia] 17 Gould's Petrel [Pterodroma leucoptera] 19 Great-winged Petrel [Pterodroma macroptera] 3 Grey-faced Petrel [Pterodroma gouldi] 4 Hawaiian Petrel [Pterodroma sandwichensis] 17 Henderson Petrel [Pterodroma atrata] 16 Herald Petrel [Pterodroma heraldica] 14 Jamaica Petrel [Pterodroma caribbaea] 13 Juan Fernandez Petrel [Pterodroma externa] 13 Kermadec Petrel [Pterodroma neglecta] 14 Magenta Petrel [Pterodroma magentae] 6 Mottled Petrel [Pterodroma inexpectata] 18 Murphy's Petrel [Pterodroma ultima] 6 Phoenix Petrel [Pterodroma alba] 16 Providence Petrel [Pterodroma solandri] 5 Pycroft's Petrel [Pterodroma pycrofti] 21 Soft-plumaged Petrel [Pterodroma mollis] 7 Stejneger's Petrel [Pterodroma longirostris] 21 Trindade Petrel [Pterodroma arminjoniana] 15 Vanuatu Petrel [Pterodroma occulta] 13 White-headed Petrel [Pterodroma lessonii] 4 White-necked Petrel [Pterodroma cervicalis] 18 Zino's Petrel [Pterodroma madeira] 9 1 General Bailey, S.F. et al 1989. Dark Pterodroma petrels in the North Pacific: identification, status, and North American occurrence.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary Glossary
    Glossary Glossary Albedo A measure of an object’s reflectivity. A pure white reflecting surface has an albedo of 1.0 (100%). A pitch-black, nonreflecting surface has an albedo of 0.0. The Moon is a fairly dark object with a combined albedo of 0.07 (reflecting 7% of the sunlight that falls upon it). The albedo range of the lunar maria is between 0.05 and 0.08. The brighter highlands have an albedo range from 0.09 to 0.15. Anorthosite Rocks rich in the mineral feldspar, making up much of the Moon’s bright highland regions. Aperture The diameter of a telescope’s objective lens or primary mirror. Apogee The point in the Moon’s orbit where it is furthest from the Earth. At apogee, the Moon can reach a maximum distance of 406,700 km from the Earth. Apollo The manned lunar program of the United States. Between July 1969 and December 1972, six Apollo missions landed on the Moon, allowing a total of 12 astronauts to explore its surface. Asteroid A minor planet. A large solid body of rock in orbit around the Sun. Banded crater A crater that displays dusky linear tracts on its inner walls and/or floor. 250 Basalt A dark, fine-grained volcanic rock, low in silicon, with a low viscosity. Basaltic material fills many of the Moon’s major basins, especially on the near side. Glossary Basin A very large circular impact structure (usually comprising multiple concentric rings) that usually displays some degree of flooding with lava. The largest and most conspicuous lava- flooded basins on the Moon are found on the near side, and most are filled to their outer edges with mare basalts.
    [Show full text]
  • Birdlife Australia Rarities Committee Unusual Record Report Form
    BirdLife Australia Rarities Committee Unusual Record Report Form This form is intended to aid observers in the preparation of a submission for a major rarity in Australia. (It is not a mandatory requirement) Please complete all sections ensuring that you attach all relevant information including any digital images (email to [email protected] or [email protected]). Submissions to BARC should be submitted electronically wherever possible. Full Name: Rob Morris Office Use Address: Phone No: Robert P. Morris, Email: Full Name: Andrew Sutherland (first noticed the second bird) Address: Phone No: Email: Species Name: Broad-billed Prion Scientific Name: Pachyptila vittata Date(s) and time(s) of observation: 11 August 2019 First individual photographed at 12.22 – last bird photographed at 13.11. How long did you watch the bird(s)? c30+ minutes – multiple sightings of 2 birds (possibly 3) and then an additional sighting of 1 bird 20 minutes later whilst travelling, flying past and photographed. First and last date of occurrence: 11 August 2019 Distance to bird: Down to approximately 20-30 m Site Location: SE Tasmania. Approximately 42°50'36.30"S 148°24'46.23"E 22NM ENE of Pirates Bay, Eaglehawk Neck. We went north in an attempt to seek lighter winds and less swell and avoid heading straight into the strong SE winds and southerly swell. Habitat (describe habitat in which the bird was seen): Continental slope waters at a depth of approximately 260 fathoms. Sighting conditions (weather, visibility, light conditions etc.): Weather: Both days were mostly cloudy with occasional periods of bright sunshine.
    [Show full text]
  • DIET and ASPECTS of FAIRY PRIONS BREEDING at SOUTH GEORGIA by P.A
    DIET AND ASPECTS OF FAIRY PRIONS BREEDING AT SOUTH GEORGIA By P.A. PRINCE AND P.G. COPESTAKE ABSTRACT A subantarctic population of the Fairy Prion (Pachyprzla turtur) was studied at South Georgia in 1982-83. Full measurements of breeding birds are given, together with details of breeding habitat, the timing of the main breeding cycle events, and chick growth (weight and wing, culmen and tarsus length). Regurgitated food samples showed the diet to be mainly Crustacea (96% by weight), fish and squid comprising the rest. Of crustaceans, Antarctic krill made up 38% of items and 80% by weight. Copepods (four species, mostly Rhincalanus gigas) made up 39% of items but only 4% by weight; amphipods [three species, principally Themisto gaudichaudii made up 22% of items and 16% by weight. Diet and frequency of chick feeding are compared with those of Antarctic Prions and Blue Petrels at the same site; Fairy Prions are essentially intermediate. INTRODUCTION The Fairy Prion (Pachyptila turtur) is one of six members of a genus confined to the temperate and subantarctic regions of the Southern Hemisphere. With the Fulmar Prion (P. crassirostris), it forms the subgenus Pseudoprion. Its main area of breeding distribution is between the Antarctic Polar Front and the Subtropical Convergence. It is widespread in the New Zealand region, from the north of the North Island south to the Antipodes Islands and Macquarie Island, where only about 40 pairs survive (Brothers 1984). Although widespread in the Indian Ocean at the Prince Edward, Crozet and Kerguelen Islands, in the South Atlantic Ocean it is known to breed only on Beauchene Island (Falkland Islands) (Strange 1968, Smith & Prince 1985) and South Georgia (Prince & Croxall 1983).
    [Show full text]
  • The Taxonomy of the Procellariiformes Has Been Proposed from Various Approaches
    山 階 鳥 研 報(J. Yamashina Inst. Ornithol.),22:114-23,1990 Genetic Divergence and Relationships in Fifteen Species of Procellariiformes Nagahisa Kuroda*, Ryozo Kakizawa* and Masayoshi Watada** Abstract The genetic analysis of 23 protein loci in 15 species of Procellariiformes was made The genetic distancesbetween the specieswas calculatedand a dendrogram was formulated of the group. The separation of Hydrobatidae from all other taxa including Diomedeidae agrees with other precedent works. The resultsof the present study support the basic Procellariidclassification system. However, two points stillneed further study. The firstpoint is that Fulmarus diverged earlier from the Procellariidsthan did the Diomedeidae. The second point is the position of Puffinuspacificus which appears more closely related to the Pterodroma petrels than to other Puffinus species. These points are discussed. Introduction The taxonomy of the Procellariiformes has been proposed from various approaches. The earliest study by Forbes (1882) was made by appendicular myology. Godman (1906) and Loomis (1918) studied this group from a morphological point of view. The taxonomy of the Procellariiformes by functional osteology and appendicular myology was studied by Kuroda (1954, 1983) and Klemm (1969), The results of the various studies agreed in proposing four families of Procellariiformes: Diomedeidae, Procellariidae, Hydrobatidae, and Pelecanoididae. They also pointed out that the Procellariidae was a heterogenous group among them. Timmermann (1958) found the parallel evolution of mallophaga and their hosts in Procellariiformes. Recently, electrophoretical studies have been made on the Procellariiformes. Harper (1978) found different patterns of the electromorph among the families. Bar- rowclough et al. (1981) studied genetic differentiation among 12 species of Procellari- iformes at 16 loci, and discussed the genetic distances among the taxa but with no consideration of their phylogenetic relationships.
    [Show full text]
  • Acoustic Attraction of Grey-Faced Petrels (Pterodroma Macroptera Gouldi) and Fluttering Shearwaters (Puffinus Gavia) to Young Nick’S Head, New Zealand
    166 Notornis, 2010, Vol. 57: 166-168 0029-4470 © The Ornithological Society of New Zealand, Inc. SHORT NOTE Acoustic attraction of grey-faced petrels (Pterodroma macroptera gouldi) and fluttering shearwaters (Puffinus gavia) to Young Nick’s Head, New Zealand STEVE L. SAWYER* Ecoworks NZ Ltd, 369 Wharerata Road, RD1, Gisborne 4071, New Zealand SALLY R. FOGLE Ecoworks NZ Ltd, 369 Wharerata Road, RD1, Gisborne 4071, New Zealand Burrow-nesting and surface-nesting petrels colonies at sites following extirpation or at novel (Families Procellariidae, Hydrobatidae and nesting habitats, as the attraction of prospecting Oceanitidae) in New Zealand have been severely non-breeders to a novel site is unlikely and the affected by human colonisation, especially through probabilities of recolonisation further decrease the introduction of new predators (Taylor 2000). as the remaining populations diminish (Gummer Of the 41 extant species of petrel, shearwater 2003). and storm petrels in New Zealand, 35 species are Both active (translocation) and passive (social categorised as ‘threatened’ or ‘at risk’ with 3 species attraction) methods have been used in attempts to listed as nationally critical (Miskelly et al. 2008). establish or restore petrel colonies (e.g. Miskelly In conjunction with habitat protection, habitat & Taylor 2004; Podolsky & Kress 1992). Methods enhancement and predator control, the restoration for the translocation of petrel chicks to new colony of historic colonies or the attraction of petrels to sites are now fairly well established, with fledging new sites is recognised as important for achieving rates of 100% achievable, however, the return of conservation and species recovery objectives translocated chicks to release sites is still awaiting (Aikman et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Southwest Pacific Islands: Samoa, Fiji, Vanuatu & New Caledonia Trip Report 11Th to 31St July 2015
    Southwest Pacific Islands: Samoa, Fiji, Vanuatu & New Caledonia Trip Report 11th to 31st July 2015 Orange Fruit Dove by K. David Bishop Trip Report - RBT Southwest Pacific Islands 2015 2 Tour Leaders: K. David Bishop and David Hoddinott Trip Report compiled by Tour Leader: K. David Bishop Tour Summary Rockjumper’s inaugural tour of the islands of the Southwest Pacific kicked off in style with dinner at the Stamford Airport Hotel in Sydney, Australia. The following morning we were soon winging our way north and eastwards to the ancient Gondwanaland of New Caledonia. Upon arrival we then drove south along a road more reminiscent of Europe, passing through lush farmlands seemingly devoid of indigenous birds. Happily this was soon rectified; after settling into our Noumea hotel and a delicious luncheon, we set off to explore a small nature reserve established around an important patch of scrub and mangroves. Here we quickly cottoned on to our first endemic, the rather underwhelming Grey-eared Honeyeater, together with Nankeen Night Herons, a migrant Sacred Kingfisher, White-bellied Woodswallow, Fantailed Gerygone and the resident form of Rufous Whistler. As we were to discover throughout this tour, in areas of less than pristine habitat we encountered several Grey-eared Honeyeater by David Hoddinott introduced species including Common Waxbill. And so began a series of early starts which were to typify this tour, though today everyone was up with added alacrity as we were heading to the globally important Rivierre Bleu Reserve and the haunt of the incomparable Kagu. We drove 1.3 hours to the reserve, passing through a stark landscape before arriving at the appointed time to meet my friend Jean-Marc, the reserve’s ornithologist and senior ranger.
    [Show full text]
  • DMAAC – February 1973
    LUNAR TOPOGRAPHIC ORTHOPHOTOMAP (LTO) AND LUNAR ORTHOPHOTMAP (LO) SERIES (Published by DMATC) Lunar Topographic Orthophotmaps and Lunar Orthophotomaps Scale: 1:250,000 Projection: Transverse Mercator Sheet Size: 25.5”x 26.5” The Lunar Topographic Orthophotmaps and Lunar Orthophotomaps Series are the first comprehensive and continuous mapping to be accomplished from Apollo Mission 15-17 mapping photographs. This series is also the first major effort to apply recent advances in orthophotography to lunar mapping. Presently developed maps of this series were designed to support initial lunar scientific investigations primarily employing results of Apollo Mission 15-17 data. Individual maps of this series cover 4 degrees of lunar latitude and 5 degrees of lunar longitude consisting of 1/16 of the area of a 1:1,000,000 scale Lunar Astronautical Chart (LAC) (Section 4.2.1). Their apha-numeric identification (example – LTO38B1) consists of the designator LTO for topographic orthophoto editions or LO for orthophoto editions followed by the LAC number in which they fall, followed by an A, B, C or D designator defining the pertinent LAC quadrant and a 1, 2, 3, or 4 designator defining the specific sub-quadrant actually covered. The following designation (250) identifies the sheets as being at 1:250,000 scale. The LTO editions display 100-meter contours, 50-meter supplemental contours and spot elevations in a red overprint to the base, which is lithographed in black and white. LO editions are identical except that all relief information is omitted and selenographic graticule is restricted to border ticks, presenting an umencumbered view of lunar features imaged by the photographic base.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Survey of North Star Area, Alaska
    United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey of In cooperation with Fairbanks North Star Borough, Fairbanks and Salcha-Big Delta North Star Area, Soil and Water Conservation Districts, and University of Alaska Fairbanks Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station Alaska This soil survey is a publication of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and other Federal agencies, State agencies, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) (formerly the Soil Conservation Service) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey. Major fieldwork for this soil survey was completed in 1988. Soil names and descriptions were approved in 1989. Unless otherwise indicated, statements in this publication refer to conditions in the Survey Area in 1988. This survey was made cooperatively by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, the University of Alaska Fairbanks Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station, and the Fairbanks North Star Borough. The survey is part of the technical assistance furnished to the Fairbanks and Salcha-Big Delta Soil and Water Conservation District. Soil maps in this survey may be copied without permission. However, enlargement of these maps could cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping. If enlarged, maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a larger scale. USDA prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD).
    [Show full text]