BC 234 BOLUS PAPERS CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Intimate Politics of the Cape Floral Kingdom
The intimate politics of the Cape Floral Kingdom Book Review The inTimaTe poliTics of The cape floral Kingdom Book Title: The production of scientific knowledge about the Cape Floral Kingdom is, today, the exclusive preserve T.P. Stokoe: The man, the of professional botanical scientists, and the legions of amateur botanists, loosely organised in the myths, the flowers branches of the Botanical Society nationwide, now labour under their direct command. However, this was not always the case. Little more than a century ago the roles were reversed: local study of the Cape Book Cover: Floral Kingdom was the exclusive pursuit of wealthy amateurs, one of whom, Cape Town stockbroker Harry Bolus, endowed the first chair in botany at the University of Cape Town (then the South African College) in 1902. His private herbarium of more than 30 000 specimens followed a decade later, together with a further bequest of £27 000.00 for its upkeep. Scientific botany thus took up residence at the Cape as the handmaiden of amateur botany: as groundsmen tending its public gardens, nurserymen dispensing seed and cultivation advice for its private gardens and gamekeepers enclosing the floral commons against the depredations of the underclass. Professional botany’s scientific enquiry was similarly shaped by its amateur patron’s preoccupations. Alongside taxonomy – the staple of 19th century botany throughout the British Empire – permanent residence lent Cape Town’s amateur botanists a particular preoccupation with ‘plant geography’ – the division of the subcontinent into ‘floristic’ regions on the basis of plant distribution. They were encouraged and assisted in this by the colonial state’s construction of railways and creation of forest conservancies, which opened up Cape Town’s hinterland, particularly the mountains, to recreational Authors: exploration by the urban middle class. -
The Correspondence of Peter Macowan (1830 - 1909) and George William Clinton (1807 - 1885)
The Correspondence of Peter MacOwan (1830 - 1909) and George William Clinton (1807 - 1885) Res Botanica Missouri Botanical Garden December 13, 2015 Edited by P. M. Eckel, P.O. Box 299, Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, Missouri, 63166-0299; email: mailto:[email protected] Portrait of Peter MacOwan from the Clinton Correspondence, Buffalo Museum of Science, Buffalo, New York, USA. Another portrait is noted by Sayre (1975), published by Marloth (1913). The proper citation of this electronic publication is: "Eckel, P. M., ed. 2015. Correspondence of Peter MacOwan(1830–1909) and G. W. Clinton (1807–1885). 60 pp. Res Botanica, Missouri Botanical Garden Web site.” 2 Acknowledgements I thank the following sequence of research librarians of the Buffalo Museum of Science during the decade the correspondence was transcribed: Lisa Seivert, who, with her volunteers, constructed the excellent original digital index and catalogue to these letters, her successors Rachael Brew, David Hemmingway, and Kathy Leacock. I thank John Grehan, Director of Science and Collections, Buffalo Museum of Science, Buffalo, New York, for his generous assistance in permitting me continued access to the Museum's collections. Angela Todd and Robert Kiger of the Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation, Carnegie-Melon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, provided the illustration of George Clinton that matches a transcribed letter by Michael Shuck Bebb, used with permission. Terry Hedderson, Keeper, Bolus Herbarium, Capetown, South Africa, provided valuable references to the botany of South Africa and provided an inspirational base for the production of these letters when he visited St. Louis a few years ago. Richard Zander has provided invaluable technical assistance with computer issues, especially presentation on the Web site, manuscript review, data search, and moral support. -
Francis Guthrie: a Colourful Life
The Mathematical Tourist Dirk Huylebrouck, Editor n 1852, in London, Francis Guthrie posed the question Francis Guthrie: of colouring a map with four colours only, the question II that eventually became known as the Four-Colour Problem. The problem is famous, but what else do we A Colourful Life know of Guthrie’s work and life? Don’t try to track him in London; come to South Africa instead. PIETER MARITZ AND SONJA MOUTON Biographical Background Francis Guthrie was born in Bayswater, Paddington, Eng- land, on January 22, 1831. His parents, Alexander David Guthrie, a London tradesman, and Kitty Guthrie (born Thompson) [7](d), had two sons, Francis and Frederick. It was unheard of that a successful tradesman would send his Does your hometown have any mathematical tourist sons to university; normally they would have followed in their father’s footsteps. These sons, however, were fortunate attractions such as statues, plaques, graves, the cafe´ to have been brought up in an enlightened family, and this is, where the famous conjecture was made, the desk where no doubt, the reason for their ability to look at life differently and to embrace it with enthusiasm and open minds. the famous initials are scratched, birthplaces, houses, or Francis Guthrie was educated at the University College of London, where he graduated with a B.A. and an LL.B., memorials? Have you encountered a mathematical sight obtaining first-class honours in both. Although he practised on your travels? If so, we invite you to submit an essay to as a barrister in London for some years, his main interest lay in mathematics, and in 1861 he travelled to the Cape Colony to this column. -
Rooibos: an Ethnographic Perspective
ROOIBOS: AN ETHNOGRAPHIC PERSPECTIVE A study of the origins and nature of the traditional knowledge associated with the Aspalathus linearis By Boris Gorelik 2017 1 Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 3 2. Literature review ........................................................................................................................ 7 2.1. General considerations ....................................................................................................... 7 2.2. Rooibos research ................................................................................................................ 8 2.3. Colonial travellers’ accounts ............................................................................................. 10 2.4. Colonial botanical literature ............................................................................................. 12 2.5. Post-colonial Botanical literature ..................................................................................... 14 2.6. Conclusion ........................................................................................................................ 16 3. Undocumented history of rooiBos ........................................................................................... 18 3.1. Before the introduction of Chinese tea (Camellia sinensis) ............................................. 18 3.2. After the introduction of Chinese tea .............................................................................. -
Erica Verticillata, from Extinction to Restoration
Erica verticillata, from extinction to restoration Anthony Hitchcock[*] Forerunner The Kirstenbosch conservation programme in the 1970s and 1980s was pioneered by Curator John Winter and focussed on establishing collections of threatened species in pots in the Kirstenbosch Collections Nursery. Each collection was established and cared for by horticulturists dedicated to specific target families such as Proteaceae and Ericaceae. While this initiative is to be commended it was severely limited due to space and inability to preserve enough gene pool in pot collections. In most cases, threatened species collections were soon reduced to single clones through attrition with little conservation value and in all too frequent instances lost altogether. In 2002, the author was appointed to the position of Nursery and Living Collections Manager which included responsibility for threatened species. The limitations of conservation pot collections and the need to revise the conservation programme were identified. To this purpose, a new conservation strategy was developed for Kirstenbosch. This comprised an integrated approach to include ex situ and in situ conservation activities. The focus was placed on sound genetic-based ex situ conservation collections and, where possible, in situ restoration at secure and ecologically sustainable natural area reserves. Fortuitously, the South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI) signed an agreement with the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew in 2000 to become a partner and contributor to the Millennium Seed Bank Project. From this time, the primary ex situ collections were housed in seed banks and these were augmented by collections in dedicated threatened species stock beds and pots. The latter were used as source material for restoration projects mainly on Cape Flats Sand Fynbos (CFSF) where a critical need was identified to conserve the vegetation type and the ecosystem therein. -
LOUISA BOLUS BIOGRAPHY Chuck Staples, CSSA Historian
LOUISA BOLUS BIOGRAPHY Chuck Staples, CSSA Historian Bolus, [née Kensit] Dr Harriet Margaret Louisa (1877-1970)—taxonomic botanist and describer of many new succulent taxa, with special interest in Mesembryanthemum. Born in Burgersdorp, Cape Province, South Africa on 31 July 1877, Louisa Bolus became an analytical botanist and taxonomist. She received an honors BA in the Arts degree from South African College, Cape Town in 1902 where Latin was one of her major subjects. During her undergraduate years she helped her great uncle, Harry Bolus (1834-1911), in his herbarium in Cape Town, South Africa. Louisa was appointed curator of the herbarium in 1903. In the early days as a botanist Louisa devoted her time to heaths and orchids, which were her uncle’s main interests. Upon the death of Harry Bolus in 1911 the herbarium and library was moved to the South African College (which became University of Cape Town in 1918), where Louisa continued working for the rest of her life. She married Frank Bolus (1870-1945), her father’s cousin and Harry Bolus’ son, in 1912. The herbarium employed various artists, such as Miss Mary Maud Page (1867-1925) and Miss Beatrice Orchard Carter (1889-1939), to paint and/or illustrate plant specimens. Due to a 1925 paper by Kew botanist Nicholas Edward Brown (1849-1934), which appeared in England’s The Gardener’s Chronicle, Louisa’s main interest shifted to African succulent plants. She became a specialist in the unwieldy genus Mesembryanthemum, which through the efforts of NE Brown, Martin Heinrich Gustav Schwantes (1881-1960) and Louisa Bolus, became divided into many genera under the Ice Plant family, Mesembryanthemaceae. -
The Sneeuberg: a New Centre of Floristic Endemism on the Great Escarpment, South Africa ⁎ V.R
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com South African Journal of Botany 75 (2009) 196–238 www.elsevier.com/locate/sajb The Sneeuberg: A new centre of floristic endemism on the Great Escarpment, South Africa ⁎ V.R. Clark a, , N.P. Barker a, L. Mucina b a Department of Botany, Rhodes University, Grahamstown 6140, South Africa b Department of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa Received 29 February 2008; received in revised form 30 October 2008; accepted 30 October 2008 Abstract The Sneeuberg mountain complex (Eastern Cape) comprises one of the most prominent sections of the Great Escarpment in southern Africa but until now has remained one of the botanically least known regions. The Sneeuberg is a discrete orographical entity, being delimited in the east by the Great Fish River valley, in the west by the Nelspoort Interval, to the south by the Plains of Camdeboo, and to the north by the Great Karoo pediplain. The highest peaks range from 2278 to 2504 m above sea level, and the summit plateaux range from 1800 to 2100 m. Following extensive literature review and a detailed collecting programme, the Sneeuberg is reported here as having a total flora of 1195 species of which 107 (9%) are alien species, 33 (2.8%) are endemic, and 13 (1.1%) near-endemic. Five species previously reported as Drakensberg Alpine Centre (DAC) endemics are now known to occur in the Sneeuberg (representing range extensions of some 300–500 km). One-hundred-and-five species (8.8%) are DAC near-endemics, with the Sneeuberg being the western limit for most of these. -
PLANT SCIENCE Bulletin Fall 2012 Volume 58 Number 3
PLANT SCIENCE Bulletin Fall 2012 Volume 58 Number 3 2012 Merit Award Winners......page 38 Botanical Society of America’s PLANTs Grant Recipients and Mentors BSA Legacy Society Celebrates !...pg ?? In This Issue.............. Introducing APPS......p. 81 Congratulations to Naomi Volain....p. 95 A labor of love......................p. 98 From the Editor PLANT SCIENCE BULLETIN “Even those of the younger generation realize Editorial Committee that within their time the feeling of the people Volume 58 toward botany as a science and botany applied has changed greatly for the good of the work. I believe Root Gorelick this is due to the fact that the utilitarian side of (2012) botany has been kept largely in the foreground, and Department of Biology & the people have come to know and understand that School of Mathematics & a substantial encouragement of the work means a Statistics direct benefit to many important interests….I may Carleton University be preaching an heretical doctrine and be criticized Ottawa, Ontario on the ground that science has nothing to do with Canada, K1H 5N1 such material things and will take care of itself if [email protected] kept pure and undefiled. This may be true, but I have long since reached the opinion that the doctrine of science for science’s sake may be beautiful in theory, Elizabeth Schussler but faulty in practice. Some one [sic] has said that (2013) pure science and science applied are like abstract Department of Ecology & and practical Christianity, both beautiful, but one is Evolutionary Biology for gods and the other for men.” These words were University of Tennessee spoken in 1903 by Beverly T. -
Flowering Plants of Africa
Flowering Plants of Africa A peer-reviewed journal containing colour plates with descriptions of flowering plants of Africa and neighbouring islands Edited by Alicia Grobler with assistance of Gillian Condy Volume 64 Pretoria 2015 Editorial board R.R. Klopper South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, RSA P.C. Zietsman National Museum, Bloemfontein, RSA Referees and other co-workers on this volume C. Archer, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, RSA R.H. Archer, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, RSA K. Balkwill, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, RSA D. Baum, University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA S.P. Bester, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, RSA P.V. Bruyns, Bolus Herbarium, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, RSA I.A. Darbyshire, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK A.P. Dold, Selmar Schonland Herbarium, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, RSA C. Geldenhuys, Northern Cape Department of Environment and Nature Conservation, Springbok, RSA L. Geldenhuys, Northern Cape Department of Environment and Nature Conservation, Springbok, RSA D. Goyder, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK P.P.J. Herman, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, RSA P. Hernández Ledesma, Autonomous University of Queretaro, Santiago de Querétaro, Mexico E.S. Klaassen, National Herbarium of Namibia, Windhoek, Namibia R.R. Klopper, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, RSA M. Koekemoer, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, RSA J.C. Manning, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Cape Town, RSA L. McDade, Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, Claremont, USA J.J. Meyer, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, RSA T.H.C. Mostert, University of Zululand, KwaDlangezwa, RSA R.T. Nyenya, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway E.G.H. -
Flowering Plants of Africa 65 (2017) a B Flowering Plants of Africa 65 (2017) Flowering Plants of Africa
Flowering Plants of Africa 65 (2017) a b Flowering Plants of Africa 65 (2017) Flowering Plants of Africa A peer-reviewed journal containing colour plates with descrip- tions of flowering plants of Africa and neighbouring islands Edited by Alicia Grobler with assistance of Gillian Condy Volume 65 Pretoria 2017 ii Flowering Plants of Africa 65 (2017) Editorial board R.R. Klopper South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, RSA P.C. Zietsman National Museum, Bloemfontein, RSA Referees and other co-workers on this volume R.H. Archer, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, RSA S.P. Bester, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, RSA G.J. Bredenkamp, Eco-Agent, Pretoria, RSA G. Germishuizen, ex South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, RSA C.A. González-Martínez, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico A. Grobler, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, RSA D. Goyder, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK L. Henderson, Agricultural Research Council, Pretoria, RSA P.P.J. Herman, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, RSA T.P. Jaca, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, RSA R.R. Klopper, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, RSA M.M. le Roux, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, RSA T. Manyelo, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, RSA J.J. Meyer, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, RSA S.M. Mothogoane, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, RSA T. Nkonki, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, RSA T.G. Rebelo, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Cape Town, RSA E. Retief, ex South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, RSA S.J. Siebert, North-West University, Potchefstroom, RSA V. -
Shaping Natural History and Settler Society Mary Elizabeth Barber and the Nineteenth-Century Cape
Shaping Natural History and Settler Society Mary Elizabeth Barber and the Nineteenth-Century Cape Tanja Hammel Cambridge Imperial and Post-Colonial Studies Series Series Editors Richard Drayton Department of History King’s College London London, UK Saul Dubow Magdalene College University of Cambridge Cambridge, UK The Cambridge Imperial and Post-Colonial Studies series is a collection of studies on empires in world history and on the societies and cultures which emerged from colonialism. It includes both transnational, comparative and connective studies, and studies which address where particular regions or nations participate in global phenomena. While in the past the series focused on the British Empire and Commonwealth, in its current incarna- tion there is no imperial system, period of human history or part of the world which lies outside of its compass. While we particularly welcome the first monographs of young researchers, we also seek major studies by more senior scholars, and welcome collections of essays with a strong thematic focus. The series includes work on politics, economics, culture, literature, science, art, medicine, and war. Our aim is to collect the most exciting new scholarship on world history with an imperial theme. More information about this series at http://www.palgrave.com/gp/series/13937 Tanja Hammel Shaping Natural History and Settler Society Mary Elizabeth Barber and the Nineteenth-Century Cape Tanja Hammel Department of History University of Basel Basel, Switzerland Cambridge Imperial and Post-Colonial Studies Series ISBN 978-3-030-22638-1 ISBN 978-3-030-22639-8 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22639-8 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2019, corrected publication 2019 This book is an open access publication. -
Guide to the Manuscripts in the University of Cape Town Libraries
GUIDE TO THE MANUSCRIPTS IN THE UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN LIBRARIES CONSOLIDATED VERSION JUNE 2013 ii LIST OF CONTENTS PREFACE . v LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS . vii MANUSCRIPTS . 1 INDEX . 452 iii iv PREFACE GENERAL This guide was compiled from the printed guide and first supplement entitled Handlist of Manuscripts in the University of Cape Town Libraries, which was published during 1968, and three typewritten accession lists. This NAREM edition was assembled and updated in accordance with guidelines laid down by the National Archivist of the Republic of South Africa. The term manuscript is used to cover all handwritten documents whether originals or transcripts, or photographic or microfilm reproductions of such documents. The term is also used to include documents of which the original was typescript. Initially the University of Cape Town Libraries possessed only a very small number of manuscripts. During the 1940s, however, a few large collections of papers and manuscripts were received, such as the Dr. CL Leipoldt Papers and the Sir Walter Stanford Papers. From about 1947, serious attention began to be given to the problem of preserving manuscripts and also of assembling the University archives. From the early 1950s onwards purposeful efforts were made to organize and record these collections. The Archives of the University of Cape Town have of recent years been organized as a separate unit. The bulk of the manuscripts in the University of Cape Town Libraries consists of collections of family papers and other private papers, but miscellaneous documents (i.e. literary and music manuscripts), and even single items, are also included. The manuscripts are mainly of South African interest, but there are a small number of non- South African manuscripts.