The History of Biological Weaponization

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The History of Biological Weaponization The History of Biological Weaponization PART ONE OF THREE W M The following study is from Chapter on San Francisco, to assess the ability of pathogens to Four of our newly revised and greatly en- spread through urban centers. The germs were meant 1 larged book, Vaccination Crisis. The entire to be harmless. However, they were not harmless enough. 1 3 book is now available from us (see bottom Eleven patients were admitted to Standard University 8 of this page). Part One deals with adult Hospital with sarratia infection. One patient, Edward J. vaccination problems. Part Two is about Nevin, died. The physicians were so astonished at the childhood vaccines, and is an expansion of outbreak of a totally rare disease that they wrote it up in the first edition of Vaccination Crisis; but a medical journal. Years later, in 1981, the government it now includes still more information on denied any responsibility and the judge dismissed a law- how to avoid childhood vaccination. —vf suit (Cole, Clouds of Secrecy, pp. 52-54, 75-104). Clusters of anthrax. Another U.S. project consisted BEGINNINGS of cluster bombs, each of which held 536 bomblets. Upon hitting the ground, each bomblet would emit a little more How it began. The Soviet germ weapon program began in the 1920s and gradually grew into a mammoth than an ounce of anthrax mist. This terrible disease, if operation. The objective was to develop weapons capable untreated, kills nearly every infected person (a very high of infecting people with anthrax, typhus, and other dis- mortality rate, even compared with the Bubonic plague eases. Stalin spent large amounts of money on the and most other pathogens). project. Practice runs. A substance, something like anthrax, was used in practice sessions against St. Louis, Minne- We get involved. Back then, the United States had no germ weapons. By the late 1930s, with intelligence apolis, and Winnipeg, cities whose climates and sizes agencies warning that Tokyo and Berlin had biological were considered similar to Kiev, Leningrad, and Mos- Project Saint Jo, weapons, Washington began to mobilize against germ cow. Code named the clandestine tests (CBW attacks in 1942. President Franklin D. Roosevelt pub- involved 173 releases of noninfectious aerosols Conventions Bulletin, June 2000, pp. 16-19). licly denounced the germ warfare plans of the enemy, even while preparing to retaliate with similar ones. In 1956, the Soviet defense minister, Georgi Zhukov, George W. Merck, president of the drug company, Merck told a Communist Party Congress that any modern war & Co., was placed in charge of the new project. would certainly include the use of biological weapons (Sidell et al., Medical Aspects, p. 54). When American Fort Detrick. The army base at Fort Detrick, Mary- land, was selected as the place where the research should intelligence learned of that statement, it energized our begin. It would eventually become an immense U.S. bio- bioweapons program even more. logical weapons center. The same year, American U-2 spy planes began fly- ing over the Soviet Union. By that time, the Russians When World War II ended. Meanwhile, in 1946 at Sverdlovsk, the Soviets set up a factory that specialized had built many secret bases throughout the nation, which in anthrax. The next year, outside Zagorsk, they built a were developing and producing germ weapons. complex for making weapons out of viruses, including Island in the Aral Sea. Shortly afterward, an Ameri- smallpox. can U-2 spy plan, flying high over a desolate island in The outbreak of the Cold War and the Korean War in the Aral Sea, photographed dense clusters of buildings 1951 led Washington to put new emphasis on planning and odd geometric grids which CIA agents recognized (Mayday: for germ battles, and rapid expansion of facilities took as belonging to a biological weapons base Eisenhower, Khrushchev and the U-2 Affair, p. 121). place at Fort Detrick. Nuclear testing was already occur- ring both in the Soviet Union and the United States. The bull’s eye ring pattern was identical to one at our Utah desert biological testing base, where roads, sen- Spraying San Francisco. In one experiment, U.S. scientists sprayed mild germs (Sarratia marcescens) sors, electrical poles, and test subjects were placed at increasing distances from germ sprayers. Germ factories. By the late 1950s, the U.S. was VACCINATION CRISIS—This important book building factories capable of producing enough patho- has been revised and enlarged. It is now 8½ x 11 gens and biological toxins to fight wars. But, officially, in size and 116 pages in length. Part One is about they were only doing that which was needed to defend dangerous adult vaccines; Part Two covers en- against such attacks. larged data and protection regarding mandatory, Q fever. In 1956, the Pine Bluff Arsenal, an army and other childhood, vaccines. Price: $6.50 + base in the woods of northern Arkansas, was turned DATE OF PUBLICATION: APRIL 2003 OF PUBLICATION: DATE $2.50. into a weapons factory producing bacteria, including tu- 2 Waymarks laremia. Soon it expanded into virus production. Before period is a full twelve days before the first symptoms long, it was also producing Q fever (Sidell, et al., Medi- (malaise, headache, fever, and vomiting) begin to occur cal Aspects, pp. 50-51, 429). and medical diagnosis is made. Q fever is a relatively mild disease which was meant, Our military leaders considered applying smallpox not to kill enemy troops, but cripple them with chills, to the Ho Chi Minh Trail in Vietnam. But the anger caused coughing, headaches, hallucinations, and fevers of up to by a fearful spread of the disease throughout southern 104o F. It was thought that sick soldiers would cause Asia, and the quick retaliation likely to come from Chi- more problems to the enemy in a war than dead ones. nese and Soviet stockpiles, were feared. So the project Another virus was Venezuelan equine encephalitis (VEE), was abandoned. a horrible disease. Protests begin. Nearly all of the information you THE 1960s have just read was not generally known back then (nor is much of it known today). Nevertheless, by the late Nixon was absent. President Eisenhower was briefed 1960s, the American public had gradually become aware on Fort Detrick’s advances just before he left the White that biological weapons were being made at Fort Detrick. House. The full meeting of the National Security Council Crowds of Vietnam anti-war protesters gathered at its occurred on February 18, 1960. But Richard Nixon, the entrance. Books opposed to germ warfare began being vice president, was absent. He was preparing for his run published (Susan Wright, ed., Preventing a Biological for president. By this time, researchers had found ways Arms Race; S.M. Hersh, America’s Hidden Arsenal; etc.). to concentrate the diseases and extend their storage lives from one to three years. Nixon calls an end. Then, on November 25, 1969, Richard Nixon announced the end of biological weapon Under Kennedy. Spending on biological weapons greatly increased after John F. Kennedy took office in testing. In January, Nixon also stopped all our chemical January 1961. The new secretary of defense, Robert weapons programs. The scientists were told to focus their McNamara, along with the Joint Chiefs of Staff thor- work on “germ defense,” not germ attack. But no limits were set on the quantities of danger- oughly analyzed the program and were satisfied that the ous microbes or chemicals which could be used in that new weapons would prove very handy in case of war, research. So our stockpiles were not reduced. especially those (such as Q fever) which could cripple But our biological/ the enemy’s troops rather than kill them. Caring for in- Overseas: business as usual. chemical defense program had been greatly damaged. jured soldiers would cause more problems than dispos- Our scientists were well-aware of the fact that it takes ing of dead ones. The development of virus weapons was 18 months to develop a weapons-grade agent and ten accelerated (Regis, Biology of Doom, pp. 185-186). Tests were made in both the Pacific and Alaska. The years to develop a good vaccine against it. They also knew hundreds of personnel involved in these tests were co- that the Soviet Union would not stop their deadly ordinated from Fort Douglas, near Salt Lake City. projects, just because we had. By that time, China was also working on chemical Improving smallpox. As we became more involved in the Vietnam War, work focused on improving small- and biological weaponization projects. Soon after, cer- tain Near Eastern nations would begin doing the same. pox and its delivery. This ancient disease was highly con- tagious, and killed about a third of its victims, mainly THE 1970s from blood loss, cardiovascular collapse, and second- The Senate is angry. In the fall of 1975, Senate hear- ary infections as pustules spread over the body (New ings uncovered a number of astonishing projects, plans, York Times, June 15, 1999). and plots by our BW (biological warfare) scientists, work- It was during this time that biologists at Fort Detrick ing with the military. learned how to extend the life of the variola (smallpox) At least 16 different, terrible diseases were stock- virus by refrigerating it in a special way which made use piled, mostly at Fort Detrick. The single largest item was of freeze drying. In connection with this, an ominous anthrax. discovery was made: Freeze drying would kill some mi- The germ treaty. That same year, 1975, an interna- crobes, but not smallpox (Hahon, Screening Studies, tional germ treaty took effect. All BW arsenals through- pp.
Recommended publications
  • Utah's Defense Sector: Economic Impacts of the Military and Veterans
    Utah’s Defense Sector: Economic Impacts of the Military and Veterans Authored by: John Downen and Levi Pace March 2017 (Updated September 2020) Utah’s Defense Sector: Economic Impacts of the Military and Veterans Table of Contents: Executive Summary .........................................2 Section 8. Defense Grants and Contracts ....................27 Economic Impacts ........................................2 8.1 DOD and VA Contracts and Grants in Utah, Fiscal Impacts .............................................4 FY 2000 to 2015 ....................................27 Federal Defense Employment .............................4 8.2 FY 2015 Contracts and Grants ......................28 Section 1. Study Methods ...................................5 8.3 Impacts of Defense Grants .........................30 1.1 Terms Used in This Report ...........................5 8.4 Impacts of Other Defense Contracts ................32 1.2 Data Collection .....................................6 Section 9. Trends in Defense Employment 1.3 Estimating Economic Impacts .......................7 and Compensation ................................33 1.4 Estimating Fiscal Impacts ...........................8 9.1 Defense Employment in Utah, 1990 to 2015 ........33 1.5 Acknowledgments ..................................8 9.2 Compensation from Defense Employment, Section 2. Hill Air Force Base Current Operations ............10 1990 to 2015. .34 Section 3. Dugway Proving Ground .........................13 Section 10. Hill Air Force Base Closure Scenario .............36
    [Show full text]
  • UTAH STATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY 300 Rio Grande Salt Lake City, UT 84101-1182 (801) 533-3535
    From the Archives: Sources 145 From the Archives: Sources UTAH STATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY 300 Rio Grande Salt Lake City, UT 84101-1182 (801) 533-3535 HOURS OF OPERATION 10 a.m.-5 p.m., Monday through Friday 10 a.m.-2 p.m., Saturday Closed Mondays and legal holidays SERVICES AVAILABLE The Library is a public, tax supported institution and is available to every- one. Most patrons visit our library in person where professional reference assis- tance is available. We are happy to respond to telephone and mail requests for information if they are limited to simple questions of fact. A photocopy machine and microfilm reader/printer are available and photographic prints can be made in various sizes for a reasonable fee. With the exception of the general reference material available to patrons in the reading room and photograph library, the collections are housed in a closed stacks area. Access to the collection is through the main card catalog and the General Index (periodicals). The General Index is divided into two sections “Subject” and “Biographical.” The “Biographical” file indexes approximately 93,000 individuals and is arranged alphabetically, giving specific references to publications in the Library. TYPES OF MATERIAL AVAILABLE The Library collects material primarily on Utah history, though some mate- rial is available on adjacent states and on states where Mormons have been sig- 146 Nauvoo Journal nificantly concentrated. We have few government records and no records of the LDS Church. We do have thousands of books, pamphlets, periodicals, manu- scripts, maps, architectural drawings, and photographs on Utah history and related fields and areas.
    [Show full text]
  • The University of Utah Campus Master Plan
    THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH CAMPUS MASTER PLAN 3. Discovery CHAPTER 3: DISCOVERY & ANALYSIS Introduction During the Discovery and Analysis phase of this pro- cess the University’s current physical campus structure, buildings, infrastructure systems, transportation and transit use, housing needs and academic space assess- ment were examined. It was the goal of this phase of the work to gain as much understanding regarding the campus’ existing conditions and operations as possible in order to glean the major planning issues that needed to be addressed in a comprehensive campus master plan. The documentation of the analysis phase of discovery is presented in one of three sections of this overall document. The analysis that can simply be reported and those recommendations that can be outlined in a summary fashion for further implementation strategies that will be discussed later in the book. The analysis is presented in this chapter. When the analysis and information gathering defines a very specific problem or issue that has been addressed by the Plan, this document presents that analysis and observational material in the “Plan Elements” or “Transformative Projects” chapters. This chapter orga- nization allows these issues and recommendation to be more closely tied. This decision also serves to minimize redundant information, which in a campus planning project of this size and complexity, would only serve to frustrate the reader. 3 – 2 THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH CAMPUS MASTER PLAN The University of Utah 2008 (view east) 3 – 3 CHAPTER 3: DISCOVERY & ANALYSIS Campus Setting Wasatch Mountain Range Regional Context The product of 20 million years of The 1500-acre University of Utah campus is dramatical- The eastern and northern portions of the City are locat- geologic faulting, volcanic activity, and ly located at the foothills of a mountain valley with the ed on a series of terraces, or former beaches, which are glaciation, the Wasatch Mountains, the Wasatch Mountains to the east and north.
    [Show full text]
  • Commandant's Annual Report, 1971-1972
    ANNUAL REPORT 1971-1972 The Judge Advocate General's School U. S. Army Charlottesville, Virginia 22901 . , SHOULDER SLEEVE INSIGNIA APPROVED FOR JAG SCHOOL Under the provisions of paragraphs 14-16, AR 670-5, the Com­ mandant received approval on 21 January 1972 for a shoulder sleeve insignia for uniform wear by Staff, Faculty, and Advanced Class personnel of The Judge Advocate General's School from the Chief of Heraldry, Institute of Heraldry, U.S. Army. The patch design is adapted from the School's distinctive crest. It is em­ blazoned across a shield of traditional blue. Its lighted torch symbolizes the illumination of intellect and leadership supplied by the School. The torch is surmounted by a gold open laurel wreath, below a gold sword and pen, with points downward, the tip ends of the wreath passing under the sword blade and pen quill FOREWORD The Judge Advocate General's School soon begins its twenty­ second year on the Grounds of the University of Virginia. In these years "the Home of the Military Lawyer" has consistently sought to serve the Army Lawyer in the field-by preparing him in our resident courses, keeping him supplied with the most recent legal information in a clear and concise form, and providing good quality continuing legal education programs both in the resident short courses and in our nonresident extension courses. But our active lawyer is only one part of our Corps and the School has likewise become the home for the lawyers in the Army Reserve and the Army and Air National Guard-the other two vital parts of our Army.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Us Biological Warfare Programs Volume I
    DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY US ARMY RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ENGINEERING COMMAND 5183 BLACKHAWK ROAD ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND MD 21010-5424 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF: December 3, 2009 Office of the Chief Counsel Mr. John Greenewald Dear Mr. Greenewald: This is the final response to your FOIA request dated March 13, 2009, for a copy of all documents pertaining to a 1977 incident that the U.S. Army had staged a mock biological attack on San Francisco, California. The Research, Development and Engineering Command located the record, US Army Activity in the U.S. Biological Warfare Program, 1942-1977s, Volume 1. 25 February 1977. I enclosed a redacted version of the record. Additionally, we located an excerpt from the book Clouds of Secrecy, The Army’s Germ Warfare Tests over Populated Areas, written by Leonard A. Cole. Mr. Cole’s book is available to the general public on the open market. The redacted record was subject to FOIA exemption (b)(2) HIGH. Exemption (b)(2) HIGH protects substantial internal matters where disclosure would risk circumvention of a legal requirement. Additionally, the redacted information is sensitive to internal Army operations. Mr. Brian May, Research, Development and Engineering Command’s Freedom of Information Act Officer, conducted a brief search of the Defense Technical Information Center secure library and determined additional records may exist. If you seek additional information on this subject, I suggest you submit a Freedom of Information Act request with the Defense Technical Information Center using the title of the enclosed record. I provided the Defense Technical Information Center, Freedom of Information Act Office’s website below.
    [Show full text]
  • April 2004 Steering Committee Materials Will Provide Needed Information
    UEN Insert cover new.final 2/13/03 2:59 PM Page 1 In Partnership with Utah State Office of Education ■ Utah System of Higher Education U TAH EDUCATION NETWORK S TEERING COMMITTEE AGENDA APRIL 16, 2004 SUBCOMMITTEES – 9:00 AM – 11:00 AM STEERING COMMITTEE – 11:00 AM 11:00 a.m. - Steering Committee Meeting 1:00 p.m. Welcome and Introductions Committee of the Whole Tab 1 NEW MEMBERS OF THE UEN STEERING COMMITTEE – ACTION ...... 1-1 Tab 2 PLANNING FOR FY 2005 STRATEGIC PLAN AND .................... 2-1 BUDGET DEVELOPMENT – ACTION Tab 3 QUARTER 3 PROGRESS REPORT ON FY 2004....................... 3-1 STRATEGIC PLAN – INFORMATION FY 2004 Strategic Plan Quarter 3 Update...................... 3-3 Tab 4 IP VIDEO PROJECT UPDATE, EQUIPMENT AND INITIAL............... 4-1 INSTALLATION RECOMMENDATIONS – ACTION IP Video Equipment Packages ................................... 4-5 IP Video Classroom Site List and Budget....................... 4-7 9:00 a.m. - Instructional Services Subcommittee Agenda 11:00 a.m. Tab 5 IP VIDEO PROJECT REPORT, APPROVAL OF ......................... 5-1 EQUIPMENT RECOMMENDATIONS – ACTION -1 UEN Steering Committee - April 2004 Tab 6 REPORT ON E-LEARNING WORKSHOP AND ........................... 6-1 BROADCAST CHANGES – ACTION Re-Thinking E-Learning Workshop Participant Feedback .... 6-3 Tab 7 UIMC GROUP BUY REPORT – INFORMATION ......................... 7-1 Tab 8 NEW CORE CURRICULUM WEB SITE – INFORMATION ................. 8-1 Tab 9 PLANNING PROCESS FOR FY 2005 – INFORMATION ................. 9-1 Planning Process Graphic......................................... 9-3 Tab 10 SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS - INFORMATION.......................... 10-1 9:00 a.m. - Technical Services Subcommittee Agenda 11:00 a.m. Tab 11 IP VIDEO PROJECT REPORT, APPROVAL OF ....................... 11-1 SITE UPGRADES AND BUDGET – ACTION Tab 12 FORMATION OF THE UTAH SECURITY ADVISORY ..................
    [Show full text]
  • ARMY INSTALLATIONS (To Include Joint Bases)
    ARMY INSTALLATIONS (to include joint bases) TOTAL DIVIDEND ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND, MD $267,371 ANNISTON ARMY DEPOT, AL $24,566 ARMY RESERVE CENTER IN SAIPAN, MARIANA ISLANDS $501,101 AS SAYLIHAY ARMY BASE, QATAR $101,328 BARRIGADA ARMY NATIONAL GUARD, GUAM $208,844 BELLWOOD DEFENSE SUPPLY CENTER, RICHMOND, VA $32,034 BISMARCK ARMY NATIONAL GUARD ARMORY, ND $5 CAMP ARIFJAN, KUWAIT $755,817 CAMP ASHLAND TRAINING SITE, ASHLAND, NE $15,453 CAMP ATTERBURY, EDINBURGH, IN $24,055 CAMP BEAUREGARD, PINEVILLE, LA $22,992 CAMP BONDSTEEL, BOSNIA $47,345 CAMP CARROLL LODGING, WAEGWAN, KOREA $8,187 CAMP GRAFORTON, DEVILS LAKE, ND $1,362 CAMP GRAYLING MICHIGAN NATIONAL GUARD, MI $11,829 CAMP GRUBER, OKLAHOMA CITY, OK $6,649 CAMP GUERNSEY JOINT TRAINING CENTER, WY $378 CAMP HUMPHREYS LODGING, KOREA $8,269 CAMP JOHNSON COLCHESTER, VT $12,591 CAMP KEYS, AUGUSTA, ME $15,187 CAMP LINCOLN, SPRINGFIELD, IL $3,438 CAMP MABRY, AUSTIN, TX $39,740 CAMP MCCAIN TRAINING FACILITY, GRENADA, MS $5,805 CAMP PARKS RESERVE FORCES TRAINING, DUBLIN, CA $7,535 CAMP PERRY NATIONAL GUARD, PORT CLINTON, OH $3,117 CAMP RILEA ARMED FORCES TRAINING FACILITY, WARRENTON, OR $3,411 CAMP RIPLEY, LITTLE FALLS, MN $37,487 CAMP ROBERT, SAN MIGUEL, CA $3,903 CAMP ROWLAND, NIANTIC, CT ($5,010) CAMP SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA $994 CAMP SANTIAGO, SALINAS, PUERTO RICO $3,907,558 CAMP SHELBY JOINT FORCES TRAINING CENTER, MS $24,152 CAMP WALKER LODGING, KOREA $8,222 CAMP WALKER, DAEGU, KOREA $323 CAMP WILLIAMS, RIVERTON, UT $51,417 CAMP ZAMA, JAPAN $322,217 CARLISLE BARRACKS, PA $271,328 CHARLES
    [Show full text]
  • SOURCE LIST APPLICATION TO: (Enter Name & Address of Exchange Purchasing Activity) DATE
    ARMY & AIR FORCE EXCHANGE SERVICE SOURCE LIST APPLICATION TO: (enter name & address of Exchange purchasing activity) DATE INITIAL APPLICATION REVISED APPLICATION SECTION I - GENERAL This is an application to be added to the Exchange source file to provide the merchandise, food, supplies, equipment, services or construction indicated herein. Send an application to all Exchange activities where you desire to be included in the source file. The application must be signed by an officer of your firm. If you fail to respond to solicitations or presolicitation notices it will be understood by the Exchange to indicate lack of interest and concurrence in the removal of your name from the source files for the items/services concerned. SECTION II - SOURCE FILE DATA FIRM NAME & ADDRESS (enter complete address, including PERSON(S) AUTHORIZED TO COMMIT YOUR FIRM CONTRACTUALLY zip code, actual street address preferred) NAME TITLE EMAIL a. b. c. E-MAIL: (required) TIN NO. DUNS NO. TELEPHONE NO. FAX NO. TYPE OF ORGANIZATION TYPE OF BUSINESS INDIVIDUAL MANUFACTURER OR PRODUCER ADDRESS TO WHICH SOLICITATIONS ARE TO BE MAILED (If different from above) PARTNERSHIP REGULAR DEALER CORPORATION, INCORPORATION SERVICE ESTABLISHMENT IN THE STATE OR COUNTRY OF CONSTRUCTION FIRM OTHER (specify): OTHER (specify): TYPE OF OWNERSHIP: (check only where the contract is to be performed in the United States, its possessions and Puerto Rico) VETERAN-OWNED BUSINESS MINORITY BUSINESS ENTERPRISE (see definition below & check appropriate box) WOMEN-OWNED BUSINESS SMALL BUSINESS TOTAL SALES FOR LAST (see definition below) TWELVE MONTHS SMALL DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS YES NO (see definition below) OTHER SERVICE DISABLED VETERAN-OWNED BUSINESS INDICATE IF OWNER OR OFFICER IS ACTIVE The term "minority business" means a business concern (1) which is at least 51 percent YES NO MILITARY, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Utah State Alumni Quarterly, Vol. 20 No. 1, October 1942
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU Utah State Magazine Publications 10-1942 The Utah State Alumni Quarterly, Vol. 20 No. 1, October 1942 Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/utahstatemagazine Recommended Citation Utah State University, "The Utah State Alumni Quarterly, Vol. 20 No. 1, October 1942" (1942). Utah State Magazine. 90. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/utahstatemagazine/90 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Publications at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Utah State Magazine by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. •I H T'S the best day you ever They're finding that merican in­ we are lighting today. Beca use to­ W kn ew? morning in spri ng dustry which crea ted things like the morrow we shall have new materials when you " ere just six years old ' cJ ctric refrigerator, the radio, the like plastics, new developments like The day you graduated? The first automobil e-and made these avai labl e television, new sciences like elec­ time you knew she loved you?When to almost a vv hole peopl e-can become tronics to work with. Because to­ you bought your firs t car? a great weapon to defend the prin­ morrow we shall return with new No! It's today' ciples whi ch have made America vigor and new vision to the task of strong and free. They're di scovering making tomorrow better than today. It's today, for young America, that the merican standard of li ving General Electric Co., Schenectady, because schools arc better, homes arc has not made them soft, as Jess form­ ew York.
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Aspects of Chemical and Biological Warfare, Index
    Index INDEX A Aircrew uniform, integrated battlefield (AUIB), 373 Air delivery Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, 398, 409–410 history, 28, 31, 34–35, 49–50 See also Edgewood Arsenal, Maryland See also Aerosol; Inhalational injury; specific agent ABG Airplane smoke tanks, 31 See Arterial blood gases (ABG) AIT Abortion See Aeromedical Isolation Team (AIT) septic, in brucellosis, 516 Alarms, 377–383 Abrin, 610, 632 biological agent, 431 Abrus precatorius, 610, 632 history, 23, 53, 60–62, 66–67 AC LOPAIR, E33 Area Scanning, 53 See Hydrogen cyanide (AC) M8A1 Automatic Chemical Agent, 380–381 Acetaminophen, 627 M21 Remote Sensing Chemical Agent (RSCAAL), 381 Acetylcholine (ACh), 132–134, 136, 159, 647 Portable Automatic Chemical Agent, 60–62 Acetylcholinesterase (AChE), 131–132, 134, 182–184 See also Detection Acetylene tetrachloride, 34 Alastrim, 543 Acid hydrolysis, 355 Alexander, Stewart, 103 Action potential, 133 Algal toxins, 457, 609, 617 Activated charcoal, 217, 362–363, 366, 370, 373, 670 Alimentary toxic aleukia (ATA), 659, 667 Adamsite Alkaline hydrolysis, 355 See DM (diphenylaminearsine) Allergic contact sensitivity, 238–239, 249, 314, 316–317 Additives, 122 a -Naphthylthiourea (ANTU), 638 Adenine arabinoside (Ara-A), 553 Alphaviruses, 562 Adenosine triphosphate (ATP), 275, 383, 431 antigenic classification, 564–565 S-Adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase inhibitors, 552 structure and replication, 569–570 Adenoviridae, 575, 683 See also Viral encephalitides; specific virus Adrenaline, 132 Alphavirus virion, 569 Adrenergic nervous system,
    [Show full text]
  • GROUNDS for PERMANENT WAR Land Appropriation, Exceptional
    GROUNDS FOR PERMANENT WAR Land Appropriation, Exceptional Powers, and the Mid-Century Militarization of Western North American Environments by Brandon C. Davis A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE AND POSTDOCTORAL STUDIES (History) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) May 2017 © Brandon C. Davis, 2017 ABSTRACT Few areas across globe have escaped the pressures of militarization. Despite the many significant developments and repercussions tied to the military control of vast areas of national territories, the complex intersections between militarization and the environment have only recently attracted scholarly attention. This dissertation argues that the contemporary condition of global permanent war and ongoing state of emergency are rooted in the military control of land and other natural resources. During the mid-twentieth century buildup of North American defense forces, the practice of military land appropriation not only legitimized and expanded certain types of unilateral, emergency powers but also produced secret and legally permissive spaces in which the exercise of such extraordinary powers and related military land use practices could be more freely conducted. A major impetus driving these mid-century land use developments was the rise of unconventional weapons of mass destruction. Not only did such weapons technologies destabilize the global political order but they also brought about a multitude of disruptions at local sites. By investigating the establishment and operations of two of the world’s largest, most secretive, and longest-lasting chemical and biological weapons proving grounds—the U.S. Army’s Dugway Proving Ground in western Utah and the Canadian-and U.K.-controlled Suffield Experimental Station in southeastern Alberta—this study reveals how the imperatives of permanent war have had critical influence in shaping the workings of power between local citizens, government, and the environment in western North America.
    [Show full text]
  • 97 STAT. 757 Public Law 98-115 98Th Congress an Act
    PUBLIC LAW 98-115—OCT. 11, 1983 97 STAT. 757 Public Law 98-115 98th Congress An Act To authorize certain construction at military installations for fiscal year 1984, and for Oct. 11, 1983 other purposes. [H.R. 2972] Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled. That this Act may Military be cited as the "Military Construction Authorization Act, 1984'\ Au'thorizSn Act, 1984. TITLE I—ARMY AUTHORIZED ARMY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS SEC. 101. The Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and may carry out military construction projects in the amounts shown for each of the following installations and locations: INSIDE THE UNITED STATES UNITED STATES ARMY FORCES COMMAND Fort Bragg, North Carolina, $31,100,000. Fort Campbell, Kentucky, $15,300,000. Fort Carson, Colorado, $17,760,000. Fort Devens, Massachusetts, $3,000,000. Fort Douglas, Utah, $910,000. Fort Drum, New York, $1,500,000. Fort Hood, Texas, $76,050,000. Fort Hunter Liggett, California, $1,000,000. Fort Irwin, California, $34,850,000. Fort Lewis, Washington, $35,310,000. Fort Meade, Maryland, $5,150,000. Fort Ord, California, $6,150,000. Fort Polk, Louisiana, $16,180,000. Fort Richardson, Alaska, $940,000. Fort Riley, Kansas, $76,600,000. Fort Stewart, Georgia, $29,720,000. Presidio of Monterey, California, $1,300,000. UNITED STATES ARMY WESTERN COMMAND Schofield Barracks, Hawaii, $31,900,000. UNITED STATES ARMY TRAINING AND DOCTRINE COMMAND Carlisle Barracks, Pennsylvania, $1,500,000. Fort Benjamin Harrison, Indiana, $5,900,000.
    [Show full text]