DOCSLIB.ORG

Meeting of the Parliament

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Meeting of the Parliament MEETING OF THE PARLIAMENT Tuesday 24 February 2015 Session 4 © Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body Information on the Scottish Parliament’s copyright policy can be found on the website - www.scottish.parliament.uk or by contacting Public Information on 0131 348 5000 Tuesday 24 February 2015 CONTENTS Col. TIME FOR REFLECTION ....................................................................................................................................... 1 TOPICAL QUESTION TIME ................................................................................................................................... 3 Scottish Parliament Election 2016 (Votes for 16 and 17-year-olds) ............................................................. 3 LEGAL WRITINGS (COUNTERPARTS AND DELIVERY) (SCOTLAND) BILL: STAGE 3 ................................................. 8 Motion moved—[Fergus Ewing]. The Minister for Business, Energy and Tourism (Fergus Ewing) ................................................................. 8 Lewis Macdonald (North East Scotland) (Lab) ........................................................................................... 11 Annabel Goldie (West Scotland) (Con) ...................................................................................................... 13 Stewart Stevenson (Banffshire and Buchan Coast) (SNP) ........................................................................ 16 Margaret McCulloch (Central Scotland) (Lab) ............................................................................................ 18 Nigel Don (Angus North and Mearns) (SNP) ............................................................................................. 20 Annabel Goldie ........................................................................................................................................... 22 Graeme Pearson (South Scotland) (Lab) ................................................................................................... 24 Fergus Ewing .............................................................................................................................................. 26 BUILDING SCOTLAND’S INFRASTRUCTURE ........................................................................................................ 29 Motion moved—[Keith Brown]. Amendment moved—[Mary Fee]. Amendment moved—[Gavin Brown]. Amendment moved—[Willie Rennie]. The Cabinet Secretary for Infrastructure, Investment and Cities (Keith Brown) ........................................ 29 Mary Fee (West Scotland) (Lab) ................................................................................................................ 36 Gavin Brown (Lothian) (Con) ...................................................................................................................... 40 Willie Rennie (Mid Scotland and Fife) (LD) ................................................................................................ 43 Mike MacKenzie (Highlands and Islands) (SNP) ....................................................................................... 45 Johann Lamont (Glasgow Pollok) (Lab) ..................................................................................................... 47 Stewart Stevenson (Banffshire and Buchan Coast) (SNP) ........................................................................ 50 Nigel Don (Angus North and Mearns) (SNP) ............................................................................................. 52 Paul Martin (Glasgow Provan) (Lab) .......................................................................................................... 55 Jim Eadie (Edinburgh Southern) (SNP) ..................................................................................................... 56 Linda Fabiani (East Kilbride) (SNP)............................................................................................................ 59 Margaret McDougall (West Scotland) (Lab) ............................................................................................... 61 John Mason (Glasgow Shettleston) (SNP) ................................................................................................. 63 Willie Rennie ............................................................................................................................................... 66 Gavin Brown ............................................................................................................................................... 68 David Stewart (Highlands and Islands) (Lab) ............................................................................................. 70 Keith Brown ................................................................................................................................................ 73 SMALL BUSINESS, ENTERPRISE AND EMPLOYMENT BILL ................................................................................... 78 Motion moved—[Fergus Ewing]. DECISION TIME ................................................................................................................................................ 79 EATING DISORDERS AWARENESS WEEK 2015 .................................................................................................. 88 Motion debated—[Dennis Robertson]. Dennis Robertson (Aberdeenshire West) (SNP) ........................................................................................ 88 Malcolm Chisholm (Edinburgh Northern and Leith) (Lab) .......................................................................... 90 Christian Allard (North East Scotland) (SNP) ............................................................................................. 92 Nanette Milne (North East Scotland) (Con) ................................................................................................ 94 Jim Hume (South Scotland) (LD) ................................................................................................................ 96 Rhoda Grant (Highlands and Islands) (Lab) ............................................................................................... 97 Mark McDonald (Aberdeen Donside) (SNP) .............................................................................................. 99 The Minister for Sport, Health Improvement and Mental Health (Jamie Hepburn) .................................. 100 1 24 FEBRUARY 2015 2 set, how money is spent and how the right Scottish Parliament resources find their way into the right places, somewhere way down the chain, a needy child Tuesday 24 February 2015 gets a new pair of shoes and a mother starved of affection gets the chance to weep. [The Presiding Officer opened the meeting at 14:00] Time for Reflection The Presiding Officer (Tricia Marwick): Good afternoon. The first item of business is time for reflection. Our time for reflection leader today is the Right Rev John Chalmers, the moderator of the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland. The Right Rev John Chalmers (Moderator of the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland): The Space is a drop-in centre in Govanhill run by the Sisters of Charity of St Vincent de Paul. One day, a mother of nine children who had been traded in for a younger model found her way in desperation to the Space. She had been left to care for her children alone, but her biggest challenge was her young son who had severe learning difficulties and was incontinent. The boy could hardly walk; his shoes were two sizes too small and they had not been off his feet in months. All I am going to tell you is that the worker at the Space bought socks and a new pair of shoes for that young boy, peeled off the old shoes, took the boy’s feet on her lap and washed them clean. While she did that, the boy’s mother wept. She wept because, where she stands in the pecking order of life, no one had ever done that for her or for her boy. The woman was experiencing love and grace being poured out. There were no words, but two things were true of that scene: real practical help was being given to someone on the margins of society, and the God that I believe in was present—present in a pair of shoes and socks from Asda. The God that I believe in is not some puppet master presiding over good and evil in the universe; the God that I believe in walks with the poor. The real reason for telling you that story is that I believe that there is a direct link in the chain of consequences that connects this place of government to that woman and her child and to the worker dedicated to her work at the Space. You see, I do not subscribe to the idea that people enter public life for self-aggrandisement. The people I know who give themselves to public life do so in order to make a difference and leave the world a better place than they found it. Today, I want you to know that, when you make the right decisions here about how priorities are 3 24 FEBRUARY 2015 4 Topical Question Time people were able to express their views and contribute in a substantive way in the referendum process. The concerns and views that the House of Lords committee report expresses are therefore 14:04 unfounded. Scottish Parliament Election 2016 (Votes for 16 Mr Crawford made a point about the extensive and 17-year-olds) engagement that the Devolution (Further Powers) 1. Bruce Crawford (Stirling) (SNP): To ask the Committee has undertaken. In a sense, that opens Scottish Government what its position is on the up the awareness and scrutiny
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Final Report Transport Scotland Strategic Transport Projects Review
    Strategic Transport Projects Review Edinburgh – Glasgow Rail Improvements October 2007 Final Report Transport Scotland Strategic Transport Projects Review Authorisation Jacobs UK Ltd in association with Tribal Consulting has great pleasure in presenting this document. Copyright Jacobs U.K. Limited. All rights reserved. No part of this report may be copied or reproduced by any means without prior written permission from Jacobs U.K. Limited. If you have received this report in error, please destroy all copies in your possession or control and notify Jacobs U.K. Limited. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the commissioning party and unless otherwise agreed in writing by Jacobs U.K. Limited, no other party may use, make use of or rely on the contents of this report. No liability is accepted by Jacobs U.K. Limited for any use of this report, other than for the purposes for which it was originally prepared and provided. Opinions and information provided in the report are on the basis of Jacobs U.K. Limited using due skill, care and diligence in the preparation of the same and no warranty is provided as to their accuracy. It should be noted and it is expressly stated that no independent verification of any of the documents or information supplied to Jacobs U.K. Limited has been made. It should be noted that all timetables are indicative and require detailed work to prove that they can be planned and operated robustly. Authorisation & Preparation Prepared by: KMcK/GKD/ET Reviewed by: JM/GKD Approved by: JM / GKD Version History Version No.
    [Show full text]
  • Passenger Focus‟ Response to Network Rail‟S Scotland Route Utilisation Strategy
    Passenger Focus‟ response to Network Rail‟s Scotland Route Utilisation Strategy Generation Two Draft for Consultation January 2011 Passenger Focus is the official, independent consumer organisation representing the interests of rail users nationally and bus, coach and tram users across England outside London. Created by the Railways Act 2005, Passenger Focus is the operating name of the Passengers‟ Council. We are funded by the Department for Transport (DfT) and our independence is guaranteed by an act of Parliament. Our mission is to get the best deal for Britain's passengers. We have two main aims: to influence both long and short term decisions and issues that affect passengers; and to help passengers through advice, advocacy and empowerment. With a strong emphasis on evidence-based campaigning and research, we ensure that we know what is happening on the ground. We use our knowledge to influence decisions on behalf of rail passengers and we work with the rail industry, other passenger groups and Government to secure journey improvements. Our vision is to ensure that operators, funders and regulators of transport systems and Government are always „putting passengers first‟ This will be achieved through our mission of „getting the best deal for passengers‟ 2 Contents Page Executive summary 4 1. Introduction 5 2. Recommendations 7 3. Analysis of gaps and options 8 3.1 Glasgow conurbation 9 3.2 Edinburgh conurbation 11 3.3 Strategic gaps – interurban 12 3.4 Strategic gaps – rural 14 3.5 Strategic gaps – network availability 15 3.6 Strategic gaps – freight 16 3.7 Terminal capacity 16 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Network Rail Strategic Business Plan Control Period 4
    Network Rail Strategic Business Plan Control Period 4 October 2007 Contents Contents Executive summary 1 1 The strategic context 20 2 The demand for rail 25 3 The industry strategy 33 4 Network Rail’s policies and strategies 52 5 Efficiency and input prices 84 6 Our plan for CP4 119 7 Expenditure and financing 171 8 Outputs 174 9 Options and sensitivities 194 10 Summary of future developments 201 Appendices 204 Network Rail October 2007 Strategic Business Plan 1 Executive summary summary Executive Executive summary The last review was therefore necessary to place the business on a secure financial footing so that The demand for both passenger and freight rail we could begin to address these problems services has increased dramatically over the last together with our industry partners in Control decade. Last year alone, total passenger Period 3 (CP3). demand increased by more than eight per cent and freight demand has also continued to grow Change is a gradual process not just in the strongly. railway but elsewhere as well. Despite this, we are approaching the 2008 periodic review from a Moreover, there is a clear consensus throughout very different position compared to the last the industry that demand growth from review. We always said that the early years of passengers and freight users will remain strong Network Rail were about stabilising the company for the foreseeable future. Increasing congestion while preparing for the further challenges ahead on roads and increasing environmental sensitivity and we have now largely completed the first two mean that rail should be well placed to continue phases of our three-phase transformation winning market share.
    [Show full text]
  • Aaron Caulfield by Email: Request-293222-Bb851539
    Aaron Caulfield Network Rail By email: [email protected] Freedom of Information The Quadrant Elder Gate Milton Keynes MK9 1EN T 01908 782405 E [email protected] 06 November 2015 Dear Mr Caulfield, Information request Reference number: FOI2015/00984 Thank you for your request of 10 October 2015. You requested the following information: “I am after the signalling diagrams of the routes operated by ScotRail stated below Glasgow North Electrics (North clyde line) + All branches Argyle Line Ayrshire Coast Line Cathcart Circle Lines Croy Line Cumbernauld Line Inverclyde Line Maryhill Line Motherwell-Cumbernauld Line Paisley Canal Line Shotts Line South Western Lines Whifflet Line Edinburgh – Glasgow” I have processed your request under the terms of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA). I can confirm that we hold the information you requested. Please find attached the signalling diagrams produced by Network Rail which cover the routes you have listed in your request. If you have any enquiries about this response, please contact me in the first instance at [email protected] or on 01908 782405. Details of your appeal rights are below. Please remember to quote the reference number at the top of this letter in all future communications. Yours sincerely, Rebecca Lindsay Information Officer Network Rail Infrastructure Limited Registered Office: Network Rail, 2nd Floor, One Eversholt Street, London, NW1 2DN Registered in England and Wales No. 2904587 www.networkrail.co.uk The information supplied to you continues to be protected by copyright. You are free to use it for your own purposes, including for private study and non-commercial research, and for any other purpose authorised by an exception in current copyright law.
    [Show full text]
  • Network Rail Monitor (Scotland)
    Network Rail Monitor: Scotland Quarter 4 of Year 5 of CP4 | 5 January 2014 - 31 March 2014 Overview This monitor provides ORR’s assessment of Network Rail’s A safe railway performance in Scotland during 2013-14, the fifth and final year of Control Period 4 (CP4). This overview also offers a Network Rail has played a key role in improving safety in commentary on the company’s performance over the whole of Scotland, closing level crossings, improving ways of working CP4. and introducing equipment to reduce risks for rail workers, and campaigning to highlight the risks the railways can pose to Network Rail has delivered significant improvements to the public. We continue to identify areas for improvement. For Scotland network over 2013-14. The programme of example, we have served Improvement Notices in relation to enhancements has delivered a new station concourse at slope examination arrangements and management of track Haymarket, electrification of the Glasgow to Cumbernauld line twist faults in Scotland. and capacity improvements at Newton. Significant progress has also been made on the construction of Borders Railway A full overview of ORR’s view of health and safety on Britain’s project and development of the Edinburgh to Glasgow railways, including detailed analysis on Network Rail’s Improvements Programme. These enhancements will deliver performance, will be published in July 2014. improved capacity, journey times, station facilities and connections to the rail network, for passengers in Scotland. Train performance Network Rail did not however achieve the performance target it Train performance has improved strongly from the decline seen was funded to deliver, for First ScotRail services at the end of during the second half of 2013, but Network Rail missed the CP4.
    [Show full text]
  • Pavement and Highway: Specimen Days in Strathclyde
    Pavement *?S HIGHWAY: Specimen Days in Stimihclyde. ER Peter Orr—Copyright. GREY DAWN IN THE CITY. PAVEMENT AND HIGHWAY: SPECIMEN DAYS IN STRATHCLYDE. BY WILLIAM POWER. Glasgow: Archd. Sinclair. John Menzies & Co., Ltd., Glasgow and Edinburgh. 1911. TO F. HARCOURT KITCHIN. NOTE. Some part of the contents of this book has already appeared in substance in the Glasgow Herald, and is reproduced here by kind permission of the proprietors. The greater portion, however, is now published for the first time. My acknowledgments are also due to those who have given me permis- sion to reproduce the photographs which illustrate the text. As will probably be surmised, the first part of the book was irrevocably in type before the publication of Mr. Muirhead Bone's Glasgow Drawings. W. P. CONTENTS. PAGE. Picturesque Glasgow, ... l Glasgovia, 51 A Garden of Youth, 74 The City Walk, ------ 86 Ambitions, 98 Poet and Painter, 115 Above the Fog Line, 124 Back to the Land, 138 The Whangie, 144 The Loup of Fintry, 153 Mountain Corn, 162 Impressions of Galloway, - - - - 173 11 Doon the Watter," 183 A 1 ILLUSTRATIONS AND MAPS. Grey Dawn in the City - (Peter Orr) Frontispiece. St. Vincent Place - (A. R. Walker) Sketch Map of Giasgovia. At the Back o' Ballagioch (J. D. Cockburn) Mugdock Castle (Sir John Ure Primrose, Bart.) Gilmorehill, Evening (Peter Orr) Waterfoot, near Busby - (J. D. Cockburn) The Cart at Polnoon (J. D. Cockburn) Craigallian Loch and Dungoyne (A. R. Walker) Sketch Map of Firth of Clyde. PICTURESQUE GLASGOW. THE anthropomorphic habit of thought manifested in the polytheism of the Greeks and the mono- theism of the early Jews has been responsible, one supposes, for the familiar expression, "the body politic." But if the capital of a country be regarded as its head, there are few large states which have answered con- sistently to the anthropomorphic image.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Scotland Transport Scotland
    Cynulliad Cenedlaethol Cymru National Assembly for Wales Y Pwyllgor Menter a Busnes Enterprise and Business Committee Ymchwiliad i’r Blaenoriaethau ar gyfer Inquiry into the Priorities for the future dyfodol Seilwaith y Rheilffyrdd yng of Welsh Rail Infrastructure Nghymru WRI 33 WRI 33 Transport Scotland Transport Scotland Paper for the National Assembly for Wales' Enterprise and Business Committee meeting 11 February 2016 - Priorities for the future of Welsh Rail Infrastructure Scotland’s railways - today Published in March 2015, Scotland’s Economic Strategy sets out the Scottish Government’s plans to achieve a more productive, cohesive and fairer country. The strategy provides a plan for all of Scotland and focuses on four main themes – investment, innovation, inclusive growth and internationalisation. Sustainable investment in our people, our assets and our infrastructure is identified as being vital to economic growth. Scotland’s railways are key to the prosperity and quality of life, linking our communities to each other, to employment opportunities, to industry, business and markets. Our railway also enables Scots and their guests to enjoy Scotland’s rich, vibrant cultural heritage and tourist attractions. Against this backdrop, investing in Scotland’s railway infrastructure remains a key priority of the Scottish Government. Since rail powers were devolved 10 years ago, demand for rail travel has increased by 45% with around 93 million ScotRail passenger journeys last year. This growth has been supported by significant investment by the Scottish Government. Since 2007, over £6 billion has been committed to improvements in rail infrastructure and services, supporting new fleets of modern electric trains, new and improved services, the delivery of seventy-six kilometres of new railways, and the opening of 13 new stations.
    [Show full text]
  • Intervention 9A – Development of Glasgow Metro Strategies
    Transforming cities Measures that will support active and sustainable travel alongside placemaking principles in Scotland’s seven cities to help transform cities and neighbourhood centres Intervention 9a – Development of Glasgow Metro strategies 1 Description of Package Glasgow Metro is an umbrella term or brand to describe a new level of public transport provision to serve and improve connectivity within the Glasgow conurbation. This would be focussed on Glasgow and the immediate surrounding areas in East Dunbartonshire, East Renfrewshire, North Lanarkshire, Renfrewshire, South Lanarkshire and West Dunbartonshire. The operating range will be determined by the characteristics of individual lines; informed by ranges established in a benchmarking exercise. In terms of specific modes this may include one or more of bus rapid transit, tram, light rail and/or metro rail, with the network complementing and being integrated with the bus and heavy rail networks. It may include completely new alignments, reuse of disused former railway alignments and/or the conversion of existing rail alignments to a new mode. It will be targeted at improving connectivity within and across the conurbation; the city and immediate surrounding urban areas, and will augment and be integrated with the bus and rail network. While corridors are not yet defined, it is envisaged that these will focus on: ▪ Unserved and underserved areas with relatively poor connectivity; ▪ Improving access to key hubs such as the city centre, hospitals, major education facilities, key employment centres, retail hubs, and major leisure/sports facilities; ▪ Integrating with major transport hubs such as Central and Queen Street railway stations, Glasgow Airport and suburban interchanges.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Quality Action Plan 2013-2016 ENS 00945 07.2013 2 Contents
    North Lanarkshire Council AIR QUALITY ACTION PLAN 2013-2016 ENS_00945 07.2013 2 Contents Executive Summary 4 1.0 Introduction 5 2.0 The local Air Quality Management Process in North Lanarkshire 6 2.1 Background 6 2.2 Monitoring Data 2.2.1 Background concentrations in North Lanarkshire 2.2.2 Monitoring of PM10 in North Lanarkshire 2.3 Detailed Assessment in North Lanarkshire 2.3.1 Moodiesburn Detailed Assessment 2.3.2 Croy Detailed Assessment 2.4 Further Assessment in North Lanarkshire 2.4.1 Harthill AQMA Further Assessment 2.5 Emissions Inventory 2.6 Previous Action Plan Measures – Progress 3.0 Policies, Plans and Developments likely to Impact on the Council’s Air Quality Action Plan 15 3.1 Roads and Transportation Policies and Plans 15 3.2 Planning and Development Polices and Plans 17 3.3 Corporate Policies and Plans 18 3.4 Sustainable Development/Climate Change Polices and Plan 19 3.5 Planned Developments in North Lanarkshire Affecting the AQMA’s 20 4.0 Consultation 23 4.1 Public Consultation Exercise 24 4.3 Stakeholder Consultation Event 24 5.0 Action Plan Measures 39 5.1 Council-Wide Action Plan Measures 39 5.1.1 Corporate Action Plan Measures 39 5.1.2 Transport Action Plan Measures 40 5.1.3 Protective Services Action Plan Measures 42 5.1.4 5.1.4 Education Action Plan Measures 43 5.1.5 5.1.5 Roads Strategy and Safety Action Plan Measures 43 5.1.6 Planning Action Plan Measures 5.2 Action Plan Measures – Motherwell AQMA 44 5.3 Action Plan Measures – Chapelhall AQMA 5.4 Action Plan Measures – Whifflet AQMA 5.5 Action Plan Measures –
    [Show full text]
  • Management Plans
    Network Rail Strategic Business Plan Update Control Period 4 April 2008 C o n t en ts Executive summary 1 1 Introduction 16 2 The demand for rail 18 3 The industry strategy 19 4 Network Rail’s policies and strategies 26 5 Efficiency and input prices 36 6 Our plan for CP4 49 7 Expenditure and financing 87 8 Outputs 91 Appendices 103 Network Rail April 2008 Strategic Business Plan update 1 Exe Executive summary next control period. ORR noted that the SBP was c utive summar a considerable improvement on earlier plans and In October 2007 Network Rail published its that Network Rail had made good progress in a Strategic Business Plan (SBP) for Control Period number of areas. It also expressed concern that y 4 (CP4) which runs from April 2009 to March some parts of the plan were not robust and these 2014. This document provides an update and generally coincided with the areas which had further justification for elements of the SBP. been highlighted in our SBP as requiring further work. Of greater concern, however, ORR said The Strategic Business Plan that it believed Network Rail had significantly The SBP was published against a background of under-estimated the scope for it to improve strong growth, improving safety and sustained efficiency in the next control period. improvements across the whole industry. This presented a unique opportunity for continuing We welcome the fact that ORR seems to agree improvement in services for the benefit of with much of our plan and we believe that this passengers and freight users, our industry reflects progress made by the industry as a partners, taxpayers, the economy and the whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Transport Strategy 2010
    local transport strategy 2010 service and people first environmental services local transport strategy 2010 Contents Page Forword 6 1. Background 8 Introduction 8 Scottish Transport Appraisal Guidance (STAG) 8 Strategic Environmental Assessment 9 Review of ‘Delivering in Partnership’ North Lanarkshire’s first Local Transport Strategy 9 2. National, regional and local policy context 11 Introduction 11 National policies 12 Regional policies 13 Local policies 14 3. About north lanarkshire 20 North Lanarkshire as a place 20 North Lanarkshire’s people 21 North Lanarkshire’s town centres 22 North Lanarkshire’s economy 23 Ravenscraig 25 Deprivation and inequality in North Lanarkshire 26 North Lanarkshire’s environment 28 Personal mobility in North Lanarkshire 29 Travel patterns in North Lanarkshire 30 Main mode of travel 30 4. North lanarkshire’s transport network: issues and challenges 33 The road network 33 Traffic modelling 35 Rail services 37 Parking and park and ride 40 Bus services 41 Walking and cycling 45 Safety and education 48 5. Consultation and engagement 51 Stage 1: Initial consultation with the public and key stakeholders 51 Conclusions 58 4 6. Opportunities 59 Introduction 59 Safety and security 59 Access to employment, health and education by public transport, cycling and walking. 60 Congestion and network performance 61 Parking in town centres 62 Maintenance and improvement of the road and footway network 63 7. Vision and objectives for north lanarkshire 64 Vision 65 Objectives 66 8. The transport strategy 75 Safety and security 75 Improving access by public transport, cycling and walking 83 Reducing congestion and improving network performance 95 Parking in town centres 105 Road and footway maintenance and improvement 108 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Powering Future Transport in Scotland
    Powering Future Transport in Scotland A Review for the Scottish Association for Public Transport David Murray-Smith Honorary Senior Research Fellow and Emeritus Professor of Engineering Systems and Control, James Watt School of Engineering, University of Glasgow Email: [email protected] June 2019 1 Abstract: This report discusses energy costs and emissions associated with transport in Scotland and reviews options for future power sources for different modes of public transport. Transport provides a major contribution to greenhouse gas and other harmful emissions worldwide and efforts to reduce these are important for all forms of public transport, as well as for private cars and for the movement of freight. The effects of transport policy decisions are recognised, increasingly, as being very important for the electricity supply industry at national and local levels, largely because of the growth in the numbers of electric and hybrid road vehicles. Moving from oil to low carbon energy for transport raises important issues for electrical power generation and distribution systems in addition to challenges already being faced by the electrical power industry as the proportion of generating capacity involving renewables increases. The report starts by considering current energy costs and emissions for different forms of passenger transport and then outlines some current developments in areas such as internal combustion engine technology, battery storage systems and hydrogen fuel cells. Systems involving short-term energy storage and recovery of energy that would otherwise be dissipated as heat during braking are also discussed. Such systems generally involve the use of super-capacitors, flywheels or hydraulic devices.
    [Show full text]