Emergency Response Plan 2006

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Emergency Response Plan 2006 Emergency Response Plan 2006 Protection marking: Version: 1 Date: April 2006 Foreword The Breckland Council Emergency Response Plan replaces all previous editions, which should now be destroyed. Under the provisions of the Civil Contingencies Act 2004, the requirement to have in place adequate Emergency Planning and Business Continuity strategies is significantly enhanced. It is important that we all recognise the statutory requirements which have to be in place, adequate emergency response arrangements etc is placed upon the entire Breckland Council staff and not just one department or team. We must have staff adequately trained and prepared to undertake their ‘emergency roles’ and the District Emergency Planning Officer will continue her work to ensure that Breckland Council is ready to meet its commitments under a single or multi agency response to any major or significant emergency which could occur with the County. The Emergency Response Plan will be distributed to appropriate personnel throughout the Authority. Many of the arrangements outlined in the various sections of this plan are generic and the principles will be applied to our response to any major or significant emergency situation, whether it is purely one which affects the internal operations of Breckland Council or the wider community of Norfolk. This document should be read in conjunction with the Breckland Council Business Continuity Plans. All staff should take every opportunity to understand the role of Breckland Council when dealing with major or significant emergencies. Becky Hellard Chief Executive Breckland Council April 2006 3 Purpose of the Plan This document has been produced in accordance with the Civil Contingencies Act 2004, with enactment of legislation taking effect from 14 November 2005 and outlines the role of Breckland Council and its response to a major or significant emergency by: • Providing guidance to all personnel in Breckland Council who are required to respond to a major or significant emergency • Outlining Breckland Council’s procedures to support the Emergency Services and public involved in the incident • Outlining Breckland’s management strategy for managing the return towards normality for the community of Breckland after a major or significant emergency • Ensuring all departments involved in the response to the emergency are aware of their decision making responsibilities and the need for the preservation and protection of records relating to an incident Protocols This plan will take effect on 1st April 2006. It will be reviewed in December 2006 and at yearly periods thereafter. This process will be advanced should legislation or best practice guidance necessitate such action. The master copy of this document and a record of the review and decision-making process will be held by Breckland’s District Emergency Planning Officer (DEPO) and will be made available for audit as necessary. Departments are requested to notify the DEPO of any changes that may impact on the contents or procedures outlined in this document. 5 Record of Amendments Amendment No Date Inserted Signature District Emergency Planning Officer Breckland Council Elizabeth House Walpole Loke Dereham Norfolk NR19 1EE Telephone: 01362 656351 Fax: 01362 656266 E-mail: [email protected] 7 Distribution List EMERGENCY SERVICES No. of Copies Norfolk Constabulary 1 Norfolk Fire Service 1 East Anglian Ambulance NHS Trust 1 NORFOLK COUNTY COUNCIL Emergency Planning Unit 1 DISTRICT/BOROUGH/CITY COUNCILS District Emergency Planning Officers: Broadland 1 North Norfolk 1 King’s Lynn 1 Norwich 1 South Norfolk 1 Great Yarmouth 1 EXTERNAL Government Office for the East of England 1 HQ 49 (East) Brigade (Nottingham) 1 RAFLO Cottesmore 1 Cabinet Office – Emergency Planning College Library 1 Environment Agency - Ipswich (who will circulate accordingly) 4 HEALTH SYSTEMS Primary Care Trusts 6 Acute Hospitals 3 Strategic Health Authority 1 Health Protection Unit 1 Mental Healthcare Trust 1 9 Glossary Bellwin Scheme Discretionary scheme for providing central government financial assistance in exceptional circumstances to affected local authorities in the event of a major emergency. DEPO District Emergency Planning Officer CCS Civil Contingencies Secretariat DCMS Department of Culture, Media and Sport Defra Department of the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs DfT Department for Transport DoH Department of Health DTI Department of Trade and Industry DETR Department of Education, Transport and the Regions Emergency Centre Operations centre from which Breckland Council will manage its response EPDO Emergency Planning Duty Officer (Norfolk County Council) EPU Emergency Planning Unit (Norfolk County Council) FCO Foreign and Commonwealth Office FSA Foods Standard Agency GO-East Government Office for East of England GOLD Strategic Management GNN Government News Network HO Home Office HSE Health and Safety Executive JOC’s/Silver Joint Operations Centres (Silver Control) LA Local Authority MACC Military Aid to the Civil Community MOD Ministry of Defence NCC Norfolk County Council NCS Norfolk County Services NHS National Health Service NPS Norfolk Property Services NSWWS National Severe Weather Warning Service ODPM Office of Deputy Prime Minister NRF Norfolk Resilience Forum RAYNET Radio Amateurs Emergency Network RIMNET Radioactive Incident Monitoring Network RVP Rendezvous Points VIP Very Important Person 11 CONTENTS Page Foreward............................................................................................................................. 3 Purpose of the Plan.............................................................................................................5 Protocols ............................................................................................................................. 5 Record of Amendments ...................................................................................................... 7 Distribution List.................................................................................................................... 9 Glossary.............................................................................................................................. 11 Contents.............................................................................................................................. 13-15 SECTION 1 – STRATEGY Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 19 Breckland Council ............................................................................................................... 19 District/Borough/County/City Council Responsibilities........................................................ 19 Central Government Response........................................................................................... 20 The Lead Department Concept........................................................................................... 20 - 21 Lead Government Departments - Default Positions............................................................ 21- 25 The Military.......................................................................................................................... 26 Major Emergency – Definition............................................................................................. 26 - 27 Major Emergency – Declaration.......................................................................................... 28 Major Emergency – Phases................................................................................................ 28 Breckland Emergency Response Plan................................................................................ 28 Departmental Emergency Plans ......................................................................................... 28 Business Continuity Plans................................................................................................... 28 SECTION 2 – BRECKLAND COUNCIL DISTRICT EMERGENCY PLANNING OFFICER AND OFFICER EMERGENCY ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES Responsibilities of Breckland Council ................................................................................. 31 Chief Executive ................................................................................................................... 32 Emergency Director (Appointed by Chief Executive) .......................................................... 32 District Emergency Planning Officer ................................................................................... 33 Head of Communications (Media)....................................................................................... 34 Finance ............................................................................................................................... 34 - 35 Asset Management ............................................................................................................. 35 Director of Corporate Resources/Cultural Services ............................................................ 35 Director of E-Services ......................................................................................................... 36 13 Head of Human Resources................................................................................................. 36 Tactical (Silver) Manager ................................................................................................... 36 - 37 Emergency Planning Liaison
Recommended publications
  • Hannah Booth Report Greater Norwich Water Cycle Study 2020-01-23
    Greater Norwich Water Cycle Study Greater Norwich Authorities Draft for consultation Project number: 60593120 February 2020 Greater Norwich Water Cycle Study Draft for consultation Greater Norwich Authorities AECOM Quality information Prepared by Checked by Verified by Approved by Hannah Booth Amy Ruocco Carl Pelling Amy Ruocco Graduate Water Senior Water Consultant Regional Director Senior Water Consultant Consultant Laura Soothill Graduate Engineer Christina Bakopoulou Flood Risk Engineer Revision History Revision Revision date Details Authorized Name Position 01 27/11/2019 Draft for comment CP Carl Pelling Regional Director 02 28/01/2020 Draft for CP Carl Pelling Regional Director consultation 03 05/02/2020 Draft for CP Carl Pelling Regional Director consultation Position statement February 2020 This report represents a working draft of the GNLP Outline Water Cycle Study. Consultation is ongoing with Anglian Water Services, the Environment Agency and Natural England who have not yet signed off the study conclusions and it is therefore subject to change. Further updates are also required to align with some recent changes to housing numbers and extension of the plan period to 2038 agreed in December 2019. These will be incorporated into the final report. Prepared for: Broadland District Council, Norwich City Council and South Norfolk District Council Prepared by: AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited Midpoint, Alencon Link Basingstoke Hampshire RG21 7PP United Kingdom T: +44(0)1256 310200 aecom.com © 2020 AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (“AECOM”) for sole use of our client (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Flood Risk Assessment
    Greater Norwich Area Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Final Report: Level 1 November 2017 This page has intentionally been left blank 2017s5962 Greater Norwich Area SFRA Final v2.0.docx JBA Project Manager Claire Gardner The Library St Philips Courtyard Church Hill COLESHILL Warwickshire B46 3AD Revision History Revision Ref / Date Issued Amendments Issued to Draft rev 1.0 / June 2017 DRAFT for comment SFRA Steering Group Final Draft rev 2.0 / August 2017 Final DRAFT for comment SFRA Steering Group Final rev 1.0 / October 2017 Final report SFRA Steering Group Final rev 2.0 / November 2017 Final Report – updated with SFRA Steering Group minor text amendments Contract This report describes work commissioned on behalf of a consortium of local planning authorities in Norfolk: • Broadland District Council • Great Yarmouth Borough Council • Borough Council of King’s Lynn and West Norfolk • Norwich City Council • North Norfolk District Council • South Norfolk Council • Broads Authority Each authority was represented as part of a steering group for the SFRA. The steering group’s representative for the contract was North Norfolk’s Policy Team Leader, Iain Withington. Sophie Dusting, Freyja Scarborough and Ffion Wilson of JBA Consulting carried out this work. Prepared by .................................................. Sophie Dusting BSc MEPS Analyst ....................................................................... Ffion Wilson BSc MSc Analyst ....................................................................... Freyja Scarborough BSc MSc Assistant Analyst Reviewed by ................................................. Claire Gardner BSc MSc MCIWEM C.WEM Chartered Senior Analyst ....................................................................... Philip Bennett-Lloyd BSc DipMgmt CMLI MCIEEM MCIWEM C.WEM C.Env Technical Director 2017s5962 Greater Norwich Area SFRA Final v2.0.docx Purpose This document has been prepared as a Final Report for the Greater Norwich Partnership.
    [Show full text]
  • The State of England's Chalk Streams
    FUNDED WITH CONTRIBUTIONS FROM REPORT UK 2014 The State of England’s Chalk Streams This report has been written by Rose O’Neill and Kathy Hughes on behalf of WWF-UK with CONTENTS help and assistance from many of the people and organisations hard at work championing England’s chalk streams. In particular the authors would EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 like to thank Charles Rangeley-Wilson, Lawrence Talks, Sarah Smith, Mike Dobson, Colin Fenn, 8 Chris Mainstone, Chris Catling, Mike Acreman, FOREWORD Paul Quinn, David Bradley, Dave Tickner, Belinda by Charles Rangeley-Wilson Fletcher, Dominic Gogol, Conor Linsted, Caroline Juby, Allen Beechey, Haydon Bailey, Liz Lowe, INTRODUCTION 13 Bella Davies, David Cheek, Charlie Bell, Dave Stimpson, Ellie Powers, Mark Gallant, Meyrick THE STATE OF ENGLAND’S CHALK STREAMS 2014 19 Gough, Janina Gray, Ali Morse, Paul Jennings, Ken Caustin, David Le Neve Foster, Shaun Leonard, Ecological health of chalk streams 20 Alex Inman and Fran Southgate. This is a WWF- Protected chalk streams 25 UK report, however, and does not necessarily Aquifer health 26 reflect the views of each of the contributors. Chalk stream species 26 Since 2012, WWF-UK, Coca-Cola Great Britain and Pressures on chalk streams 31 Coca-Cola Enterprises have been working together Conclusions 42 to secure a thriving future for English rivers. The partnership has focused on improving the health A MANIFESTO FOR CHALK STREAMS 45 of two chalk streams directly linked to Coca-Cola operations: the Nar catchment in Norfolk (where AN INDEX OF ENGLISH CHALK STREAMS 55 some of the sugar beet used in Coca-Cola’s drinks is grown) and the Cray in South London, near 60 to Coca-Cola Enterprises’ Sidcup manufacturing GLOSSARY site.
    [Show full text]
  • Tactical Flood Response Plan Part One
    OFFICIAL Tactical Flood Response Plan Part One Version 5.1 Author NRF Severe Weather & Flood Risk Group Reviewed by NRF Severe Weather & Flood Risk Authorised by Environment Agency Next review date June 2018 OFFICIAL Page 1 of 65 OFFICIAL Foreword This document has been produced after consultation with Category 1 and 2 Responders (as defined within the Civil Contingencies Act 2004), through the Norfolk Resilience Forum. It provides guidance by which Norfolk can be suitably prepared to respond to an actual or potential major flooding emergency, whereby the combined resources of numerous agencies are required. It will be used by these agencies when information is received or events occur that require a coordinated response at the tactical level. Tom McCabe NRF Executive Lead – Protection Capability Workstream Norfolk County Council OFFICIAL Page 2 of 65 OFFICIAL Table of Contents Foreword .............................................................................................................................................................................................2 Purpose ...............................................................................................................................................................................................8 Local Considerations: ........................................................................................................................................................................8 Protocols .............................................................................................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Environment Agency Anglian Region Strategy for Groundwater
    £A-Ari0liAn W-uVer R^'Source.a ^ o x i3 Environment Agency Anglian Region Strategy for Groundwater Investigations and Modelling: Yare and North Norfolk Areas Scoping Study 27 January 2000 Entec UK Limited E n v ir o n m e n t A g e n c y NATIONAL LIBRARY & INFORMATION SERVICE ANGLIAN REGION Kingfisher House, Goldhay Way, Orton Goldhay. Peterborough PE2 5ZR En v ir o n m e n t Ag e n c y Report for Environment Agency Environment Agency Kingfisher House Anglian Region Goldhay Way Orton Goldhay Peterborough Strategy for PE2OZR Groundwater Main Contributors Investigations and Stuart Sutton Modelling: Yare and Tim Lewis Ben Fretwell North Norfolk Areas Issued by Scoping Study Tim Lewis 27 January 2000 Entec UK Limited Approved by Stuart Sutton Entec UK Limited 160-162 Abbey Forcgatc Shrewsbury Shropshire SY26BZ England Tel: +44 (0) 1743 342000 Fax: +44 (0) 1743 342010 f:\data\data\projects\hm-250\0073 2( 15770)\docs\n085i 3 .doc Certificate No. FS 34171 In accordance with an environmentally responsible approach, this report is printed on recycled paper produced from 100V. post-consumer waste. Contents 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Strategy for Groundwater Investigations and Modelling 1 1.2 Structure of Strategy Projects and Approach to Seeking Approval 2 1.3 Organisation of this Report 3 2. Description of the Yare & North Norfolk Groundwater Resource Investigation Area and Current Understanding of the Hydrogeological System 7 2.1 Introduction 7 2.2 Location 7 2.3 Geology 7 2.4 Hydrology and Drainage 8 2.5 Basic Conceptual Hydrogeological Understanding 9 2.6 Water Resources 11 2.7 Conservation Interest 13 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Abstraction
    WRMP 2019 Technical Document: Sustainable Abstraction December 2019 Introduction PR14 NEP WFD No Option Selection Forward Look Invasive and Fish and Eel Article 4.7 Schemes Deterioration non-native species Passage This is a technical report that supports our WRMP submission. Anglian Water is committed to achieving sustainable levels of abstraction. This report provides an overview of our approach to sustainable abstraction in the 2019 WRMP, including our obligations under the Water Industry National Environment Programme (WINEP) and Water Framework Directive (WFD). 2 Introduction PR14 NEP WFD No Option Selection Forward Look Invasive and Fish and Eel Article 4.7 Schemes Deterioration non-native species Passage Contents Executive Summary 4 1. Introduction 5 • 1.1 The Water Resources Management Plan 5 • 1.2 Overview 6 2. PR14 NEP Schemes 7 • 2.1 Coston Fen 7 • 2.2 River Wensum 7 • 2.3 North Norfolk Coast 7 3. WFD No Deterioration 8 • 3.1 Time Limited Licences 9 • 3.2 Permanent Licences 9 • 3.3 Abstraction Incentive Mechanism 9 4. Option Selection 10 • 4.1 Options Appraisals Approach 10 • 4.2 Customer Support 11 • 4.3 Future Exports 12 • 4.4 Sustainability Changes 12 • 4.5 Mitigation Options 18 5. Forward Look 19 • 5.1 Investigations and Options Appraisals 19 • 5.2 AMP8 Mitigation Schemes 19 • 5.3 Ants Broads and Marshes 19 6. Invasive and non-native species 20 • 6.1 Supply Side Options 20 • 6.2 Current Operations 20 7. Fish and Eel Passage 21 8. Article 4.7 21 3 Introduction PR14 NEP WFD No Option Selection Forward Look Invasive and Fish and Eel Article 4.7 Schemes Deterioration non-native species Passage Executive summary Anglian Water is committed to achieving sustainable the allowance for cessation of abstraction from levels of abstraction through a combination of our groundwater source near Catfield Fen in 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • River Basin Management Plan Anglian River Basin District
    River Basin Management Plan Anglian River Basin District Annex D: Protected area objectives Contents D.1 Introduction 2 D.2 Types and location of protected areas 3 D.3 Monitoring network 12 D.4 Objectives 19 D.5 Compliance (results of monitoring) including 22 actions (measures) for Surface Water Drinking Water Protected Areas and Natura 2000 Protected Areas D.6 Other information 118 D.1 Introduction The Water Framework Directive specifies that areas requiring special protection under other EC Directives and waters used for the abstraction of drinking water are identified as protected areas. These areas have their own objectives and standards. Article 4 of the Water Framework Directive requires Member States to achieve compliance with the standards and objectives set for each protected area by 22 December 2015, unless otherwise specified in the Community legislation under which the protected area was established. Some areas may require special protection under more than one EC Directive or may have additional (surface water and/or groundwater) objectives. In these cases, all the objectives and standards must be met. Article 6 requires Member States to establish a register of protected areas. The types of protected areas that must be included in the register are: • areas designated for the abstraction of water for human consumption (Drinking Water Protected Areas); • areas designated for the protection of economically significant aquatic species (Freshwater Fish and Shellfish); • bodies of water designated as recreational waters, including areas designated as Bathing Waters; • nutrient-sensitive areas, including areas identified as Nitrate Vulnerable Zones under the Nitrates Directive or areas designated as sensitive under Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive (UWWTD); • areas designated for the protection of habitats or species where the maintenance or improvement of the status of water is an important factor in their protection including 1 relevant Natura 2000 sites.
    [Show full text]
  • The Broadland Rivers Management Catchment
    The Broadland Rivers Management Catchment Figure 1 - Remains of Brograve windmill on the River Thurne (courtesy of Bridget Marr). A summary of information about the water environment in the Broadland Rivers Management Catchment We are the Environment Agency. We protect and improve the environment and make it a better place for people and wildlife. We operate at the place where environmental change has its greatest impact on people’s lives. We reduce the risks to people and properties from flooding; make sure there is enough water for people and wildlife; protect and improve air, land and water quality and apply the environmental standards within which industry can operate. Acting to reduce climate change and helping people and wildlife adapt to its consequences are at the heart of all that we do. We cannot do this alone. We work closely with a wide range of partners including government, business, local councils, other agencies, civil society groups and the communities we serve. Published by: Environment Agency Further copies of this report are available Horizon House, Deanery Road, on the e-consultation tool: Bristol BS1 5AH www.gov.uk/government/consultations/update-to- Email: enquiries@environment- the-draft-river-basin-management-plans and via our agency.gov.uk National Customer Contact Centre: www.gov.uk/environment-agency T: 03708 506506 Email: [email protected]. © Environment Agency 2014 All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. 2 Contents The Broadland Rivers Management Catchment ........................................................ 1 Contents ..................................................................................................................... 3 1 Your views count ................................................................................................. 5 2 The Broadland Rivers Management Catchment ................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Water Cycle Study Stage 1
    Greater Norwich Development Partnership Water Cycle Study – Stage 1 Final 3 Data Collection and Catchment Characteristics The data collection was the first process in Stage 1 of the Water Cycle Study. A request of information was sent to the stakeholders and interested parties and is outlined in Appendix H. Missing data were identified and subsequent requests were undertaken in discussion with the relevant stakeholders. The information was recorded on an external hard-drive and it is intended that this will be submitted to the GNDP on completion of the study. GIS formed the cornerstone of the data analysis, and where possible the data requested was inclusive of a spatial referencing so that it could be compared and contrasted with other datasets. The analysis was undertaken using MapInfo software. Other reports were reviewed to assist in the generation of this document. These are referenced in Section 10 and include: • JCS Strategic Growth Options • Corby Water Cycle Strategy – Phase 1 • North Northamptonshire Outline Water Cycle Strategy • Initial Growth Paper (GNDP) The major disciplines within the WCS are identified below. 3.1 Flood Risk & Hydrology The Environment Agency is responsible for managing flood defence in England and Wales and has provided the flood risk and hydrology information for the Study Area. A Strategic Flood Risk Assessment has been commissioned for the Greater Norwich area; however, this was not available for review during Stage 1 of the Water Cycle Study. Therefore, for the purpose of this report the floodplain outlines that have been used in the assessment of the growth areas are those provided by the Environment Agency.
    [Show full text]
  • Apr-19 May-19 Jun-19 Jul-19 Aug-19 Sep-19 Oct-19 Nov-19 Dec-19 Jan
    PROGRAMME OF WORKS MAINTENANCE Actual works ACTIVITY DETAIL Apr-19 May-19 Jun-19 Jul-19 Aug-19 Sep-19 Oct-19 Nov-19 Dec-19 Jan-20 Feb-20 Mar-20 ACTIVITY required Lower Bure - Aylsham Mill To Ingworth Mill WM Weedcut (m) Weedcut by Boat 1 Lower Bure - Burgh Mill To Aylsham Mill Weedcut (m) Weedcut by Boat 1 Lower Bure - Buxton Mill To Burgh Mill Weedcut (m) Weedcut by Boat 1 Lower Bure - Horstead Mill To Buxton Mill Weedcut (m) Weedcut by Boat 1 Lower Bure - Horstead Mill To Buxton Mill Weedcut (m) Weedcut by Boat 1 Burgh to Aylsham - TW Tree Work Tree Work 1 1 1 Buxton to Burgh - TW Tree Work Tree Work 1 1 1 Horstead to Buxton - TW October Tree Work Tree Work 1 1 1 Upper Bure - Upper Bure MC Maintenance Check Channel Clearance 1 Cley Catchwater Weed Maintenance Weedcut (m) Weedcut by boat 1 Cley To Blakeney Drain WM Weedcut (m) Weedcut by Boat 1 Cley Sluice to Felbrigg Ponmd - Bayfield To Little Thornage MC Maintenance Check Channel Clearance 1 Cley Sluice To Felbrigg Pond - Hunworth GS to Castlehill MC Maintenance Check Channel Clearance 1 Cley Sluice To Felbrigg Pond - River Glaven - Bramble Flap / Glaven Maintenance Check Channel Clearance 1 OF Cley Sluice - Glaven Outfall Structure to Wiveton Bridge WM Weedcut (m) Weedcut by Boat 1 Weybourne Beck MC Maintenance Check Channel Clearance 1 Lower Burn - Burnham Overy MC Maintenance Check Channel Clearance 1 Upper Burn - River Burn Targetted MC Jun Maintenance Check Channel Clearance 1 Upper Burn - River Burn Targetted MC Aug Maintenance Check Channel Clearance 1 Upper Burn - River Burn
    [Show full text]
  • Local Flood Risk Management Strategy
    Norfolk Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Post Consultation Final 31 July 2015 1 2 Part One: Flooding and Flood Risk Management Contents Part One: Flooding and Flood Risk Management ........................................ 5 1. Introduction .................................................................................... 5 2 What Is Flooding? .......................................................................... 8 3. What is Flood Risk? .................................................................... 10 4. What are the sources of flooding? ............................................. 13 5. Sources of Local Flood Risk ....................................................... 14 6. Sources of Strategic Flood Risk ................................................. 17 7. Flood Risk Management .............................................................. 19 8. Flood Risk Management Authorities ........................................ ..23 Part Two: Flood Risk in Norfolk 9. Flood Risk in Norfolk ................................................................. ..31 10. Broadland District .................................................................... ....40 11. Breckland District ...................................................................... .46 12. Great Yarmouth Borough .......................................................... ..52 13. Borough of King’s Lynn & West Norfolk ................................. ..61 14. North Norfolk District ................................................................ ..74 15. Norwich
    [Show full text]
  • A Meeting of the Norfolk Rivers Internal Drainage Board Was Held at Hunters Hall, Swanton Morley, Dereham, Norfolk on Thursday 23 October 2014 at 10 Am
    A MEETING OF THE NORFOLK RIVERS INTERNAL DRAINAGE BOARD WAS HELD AT HUNTERS HALL, SWANTON MORLEY, DEREHAM, NORFOLK ON THURSDAY 23 OCTOBER 2014 AT 10 AM. Elected Members Appointed Members * H C Birkbeck Breckland DC * A Borthwick * S G Bambridge J Bracey W Borrett * J F Carrick M Kiddle-Morris H G Cator * N W D Foster Broadland DC B J Hannah * Mrs C H Bannock J P Labouchere * A P Findley * M R Little * R R Nash * T Mutimer * Mrs B Rix J F Oldfield * P D Papworth King’s Lynn & WN BC M J Sayer * Mrs E Watson S Shaw * R Wilbourn North Norfolk DC Mrs A R Green Ms B Palmer J H Perry-Warnes R Shepherd J A Wyatt South Norfolk DC * C Gould * Dr N Legg * T Lewis Present (55%) Mr P D Papworth in the Chair In attendance: Mr P J Camamile (Chief Executive), Mr A Goodwin (District Engineer/Health & Safety Officer), Mr G Bloomfield (Catchment Officer), Ms C Laburn (Technical and Environmental Officer) and Mrs M Creasy (minutes) 1 ID Norfolk Rivers IDB, Minute Action 58/14 APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE 58/14/01 Apologies for absence were received on behalf of Messrs W Borrett, J Bracey, H G Cator, B Hannah, M Kiddle-Morris, J P Labouchere, J F Oldfield, J H Perry-Warnes, M J Sayer, S Shaw, R Shepherd, J A Wyatt, Mrs A R Green and Ms B Palmer. 59/14 DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST 59/14/01 There were no declarations of interest other than those already recorded in the Register of Members’ Interests.
    [Show full text]