Environment Agency Anglian Region Strategy for Groundwater

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Environment Agency Anglian Region Strategy for Groundwater £A-Ari0liAn W-uVer R^'Source.a ^ o x i3 Environment Agency Anglian Region Strategy for Groundwater Investigations and Modelling: Yare and North Norfolk Areas Scoping Study 27 January 2000 Entec UK Limited E n v ir o n m e n t A g e n c y NATIONAL LIBRARY & INFORMATION SERVICE ANGLIAN REGION Kingfisher House, Goldhay Way, Orton Goldhay. Peterborough PE2 5ZR En v ir o n m e n t Ag e n c y Report for Environment Agency Environment Agency Kingfisher House Anglian Region Goldhay Way Orton Goldhay Peterborough Strategy for PE2OZR Groundwater Main Contributors Investigations and Stuart Sutton Modelling: Yare and Tim Lewis Ben Fretwell North Norfolk Areas Issued by Scoping Study Tim Lewis 27 January 2000 Entec UK Limited Approved by Stuart Sutton Entec UK Limited 160-162 Abbey Forcgatc Shrewsbury Shropshire SY26BZ England Tel: +44 (0) 1743 342000 Fax: +44 (0) 1743 342010 f:\data\data\projects\hm-250\0073 2( 15770)\docs\n085i 3 .doc Certificate No. FS 34171 In accordance with an environmentally responsible approach, this report is printed on recycled paper produced from 100V. post-consumer waste. Contents 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Strategy for Groundwater Investigations and Modelling 1 1.2 Structure of Strategy Projects and Approach to Seeking Approval 2 1.3 Organisation of this Report 3 2. Description of the Yare & North Norfolk Groundwater Resource Investigation Area and Current Understanding of the Hydrogeological System 7 2.1 Introduction 7 2.2 Location 7 2.3 Geology 7 2.4 Hydrology and Drainage 8 2.5 Basic Conceptual Hydrogeological Understanding 9 2.6 Water Resources 11 2.7 Conservation Interest 13 3. Consultation with Interested Parties 15 3.1 Introduction 15 3.2 Internal Consultation 15 3.3 External Consultation 16 3.4 Summary 17 4. Identification of Water Resources and Other Related Issues 19 4.1 Introduction: Generic Issues 19 4.2 Regulatory Framework for Abstraction Licensing 20 4.3 Issues identified in LEAPs and Other Documents 20 4.4 Scientific Issues and Uncertainties 23 4.4.1 Inputs to the System 23 f:\da ta\data\projects\hm-2S0\00732( 15770)Uocs\n085i3.doc 27 January 2000 Entec 4.4.2 Outputs from the System 23 4.4.3 The Groundwater and Surface Water Flow Framework 24 4.5 Specific and Operational Issues 25 4.6 The Habitats Directive 27 4.7 Complementary Studies 28 5. Data and Information Currently Available 31 5.1 Data Summary 31 5.1.1 Meteorology 31 5.1.2 Hydrology 31 5.1.3 Hydrogeology 31 5.1.4 Abstractions 32 5.1.5 Discharge consents 32 5.1.6 Geology 32 5.1.7 Topography , 33 5.1.8 Soils and Land Use 33 5.1.9 Water Quality 34 5.1.10 Groundwater Models 34 5.1.11 Contaminated Land and Landfill 34 5.2 GIS 34 5.3 Data Outside the Agency 35 6. Yare & North Norfolk Project: Overall Project Structure and Management of Risks, Constraints and Uncertainties 39 6.1 Introduction 39 6.2 Major Options 40 6.3 Risk Management 42 7. Yare & North Norfolk Project: Description of Tasks and Options for Stage 1 45 7.1 Introduction 45 7.2 Project Meetings (Task 1) 47 7.3 Data Collation 50 7.3.1 Task 2 Hydrogeological and Meteorological Data Assembly 50 7.3.2 Task 3 Geology 56 7.3.3 Task 4 Soils, Land Use and Drainage 57 7.3.4 Task 5 Local Studies 58 f:\data\dat2\projects\hm-250\00732(l 5 770)\docs\n085 i3.doc 27 January 2000 Entec 7.3.5 Task 6 Literature Review 60 7.3.6 Task 7 Data Catalogue 60 7.4 Data Analysis 61 7.4.1 Task 8 Rainfall Distribution 61 7.4.2 Task 9 Groundwater Head Interpretation 62 7.4.3 Task 10 Interpretation of Hydrochemical Data 63 7.4.4 Task 11 Riverflow Analysis 65 7.4.5 Task 12 Effective Rainfall Calculation 67 7.5 Data Interpretation and Integration 68 7.5.1 Task 13 Calculation of Preliminary Water Balances 68 7.5.2 Task 14 Development of Conceptual Model 69 7.5.3 Task 15 Proposed Development and Refinement of Numerical Model(s) 70 7.5.4 Task 16 Define Further Investigations 71 7.5:5 Task 17 Stage 1 Report 71 7.5.6 Task 18 Update PID 72 8. Yare & North Norfolk Project: Stage 1 Preferred Options and Plan of Work 73 8.1 Introduction 73 8.2 Categorisation of Options 73 8.3 Comparison of Input Estimates 74 9. Yare & North Norfolk Project: Stages 2 to 5: Potential Options and Outcomes of the Overall Project 75 9.1 Introduction 75 9.2 Stage 2 75 9.3 Stages 3,4 and 5 78 10. Summary of Recommendations 81 10.1 Stage 1 81 10.2 Stage 2 81 10.3 Risk Management 83 10.4 Benefits 83 f:\daia\da ta\projects\hm-250\00732( 15770)\docs\rr085 i3 .doc 27 January 2000 Entec iv Table 2.1 Yare & North Norfolk Area - Summary Statistics 12 Table 3.1 Yare & North Norfolk Area, Water Resources, Local Government and Conservation Organisation 16 Table 4.2 Partnership Initiatives 29 Table 7.1 Stage 1 Task List and Component Activities 48 Table 7.2 Potential Water Balance Components 69 Table 10.1 Stage 1 Preferred Option Summary 82 Box 1.1 Flow Chart Showing Strategy Project Stages and Approvals 5 Box 4.1 LEAP Issues and Support from the Yare & North Norfolk Project 21 Box 4.2 Specific and Operational Issues and Support from the Yare & North Norfolk Project 26 Box 7.1 Uncertainties in Understanding of the Hydrogeological System 46 Figure 1.1 Anglian Region Investigation Units (from the Strategy) After Page 6 Figure 2.1 Project Area Showing Main Rivers and Hydrometric Areas After Page 14 Figure 2.2a Hydrogeology of the Yare North & North Norfolk Project Area (West) After Page 14 Figure 2.2b Hydrogeology of the Yare North & North Norfolk Project Area (East) After Page 14 Figure 2.3 Project Area Showing Main Rivers and IDB Drains After Page 14 Figure 2.4 Schematic Hydrogeological Cross-Section through the Project Area After Page 14 Figure 2.5 Conservation Sites within the Project Area After Page 14 Figure 6.1 Yare North & North Norfolk - Estimated Overall Timescale After Page 44 Figure 6.2 Yare and North Norfolk Project: Groundwater Investigations and Modelling After Page 44 Options Figure 6.3 Yare North & North Norfolk Project: Proposed Project Organisattion After Page 44 Figure 7.1 Yare North & North Norfolk Project: Stage 1 Summary Programme After Page 72 Figure 7.2 Habitats Directive Wetland Sites within Yare and North Norfolk Area After Page 72 Figure 7.3 Effective Rainfall Calculation and Partitioning After Page 72 Figure 8.1 Yare & North Norfolk Project * Summary of Stage 1 Task Options and Input After Page 74 Estimates Figure 8.2 Yare & North Norfolk Project: Variations from Preferred Option After Page 74 Figure 9.1 Yare & North Norfolk Project: Stage 2 Options After Page 80 Figure 9.2 Yare & North Norfolk Project: Optionsfor Stages 3, 4 and 5 After Page 80 Appendix A Data Listing and Condition Appendix B Bibliography Appendix C External Consultation f:\data\data\projects\hm-2S0\OO73 2( 15 770)\docs\rr085i3 .doc 27 January 2000 Entec 1 1. Introduction 1.1 Strategy for Groundwater Investigations and Modelling The Anglian Region ‘Strategy for Groundwater Investigations and Modelling’ was accepted by the Project Approval Board in February 1998. The Strategy was prepared following the publication of the Anglian Region Water Resources Strategy (September 1994). The Water Resources Strategy identified the groundwater resources available for abstraction within the main aquifer units across the Anglian Region and identified the amount of resource which it was believed should be allocated to maintain acceptable river flows. This assessment of groundwater resources was based on simplistic groundwater balance techniques (see Annex 4 of Water Resources Strategy) using average climatic conditions. The Strategy for Groundwater Investigation and Modelling (The Strategy) which was prepared in the context of the National Environmental Strategy and the Water Resources Functional Strategy, sets out detailed proposals for the review of the groundwater resources in line with sound science and defensible technical practice. The national initiative for the implementation of this review of groundwater resources is being led by the National Groundwater and Contaminated Land Centre. The overall aim of the implementation of The Strategy is to provide a resource management tool that is demonstrably based on sound science and good technical practice. In the process of development of this tool (probably a distributed groundwater model) improved understanding and resource assessments of groundwater systems of main aquifers across the Region will be achieved. The need for a more rigorous and technically defensible groundwater resource appraisal is driven by the combination of increasing resource usage and increased awareness of the importance of groundwater in environmental conservation. These drivers have led to a series of regulatory and consultative documents which provide (or imply a future) statutory obligation to improve resource assessments and to generate public understanding of these assessments. Specifically the key documents are: • the EU Water Framework Directive and its requirement for the preparation of river basin management plans and their review on a 6 year cycle; • the DETR White Paper, ‘Taking Water Responsibly’ which recognises the obligations imposed by the Framework Directive; • The EU Habitats Directive and the obligation to review abstractions with potential impacts on designated conservation sites by March 2004; • the developing Area Management Strategies as a first step to implementation of Framework Directive and White Paper requirements; • the LEAP process and the issues identified in the LEAP reports.
Recommended publications
  • Annex 7: Completed Workbook Trial for New Anglia
    Annex 7: Completed workbook trial for New Anglia RPA | Annexes Local Economic Development and the Environment (LEDE) workbook Local Economic Development and the Environment (LEDE) project researcher workbook April 2013 1 Local Economic Development and the Environment (LEDE) workbook Organizational details Name of LEP: New Anglia Lead responsible officer for LEP Name: Role: Address: Telephone number: Mobile telephone number: E-mail address: Researcher Name: Risk & Policy Analysts Ltd. Organization: Risk & Policy Analysts Ltd. Role: Address: Farthing Green House, 1 Beccles Rd, Loddon, Norfolk, NR14 6LT Telephone number: 01508 528465 Mobile telephone number: E-mail address: [email protected] 2 Local Economic Development and the Environment (LEDE) workbook Contents Contents .................................................................................................................................................. 3 1. One page initial summary ............................................................................................................... 7 1.1. The geographical area of the LEP ............................................................................................ 7 1.2. Description of the economy of the area ................................................................................. 7 1.3. Challenges faced by the economy .......................................................................................... 8 1.4. The plausible future development pathway ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Norfolk Local Flood Risk Management Strategy
    Appendix A Norfolk Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Consultation Draft March 2015 1 Blank 2 Part One - Flooding and Flood Risk Management Contents PART ONE – FLOODING AND FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT ..................... 5 1. Introduction ..................................................................................... 5 2 What Is Flooding? ........................................................................... 8 3. What is Flood Risk? ...................................................................... 10 4. What are the sources of flooding? ................................................ 13 5. Sources of Local Flood Risk ......................................................... 14 6. Sources of Strategic Flood Risk .................................................... 17 7. Flood Risk Management ............................................................... 19 8. Flood Risk Management Authorities ............................................. 22 PART TWO – FLOOD RISK IN NORFOLK .................................................. 30 9. Flood Risk in Norfolk ..................................................................... 30 Flood Risk in Your Area ................................................................ 39 10. Broadland District .......................................................................... 39 11. Breckland District .......................................................................... 45 12. Great Yarmouth Borough .............................................................. 51 13. Borough of King’s
    [Show full text]
  • Parish Share Report
    PARISH SHARE PAYMENTS For period ended 30th September 2019 SUMMARY OF PARISH SHARE PAYMENTS BY DEANERIES Dean Amount % Deanery Share Received for 2019 % Deanery Share % No Outstanding 2018 2019 to period end 2018 Received for 2018 received £ £ £ £ £ Norwich Archdeaconry 06 Norwich East 23,500 4.41 557,186 354,184 63.57 532,380 322,654 60.61 04 Norwich North 47,317 9.36 508,577 333,671 65.61 505,697 335,854 66.41 05 Norwich South 28,950 7.21 409,212 267,621 65.40 401,270 276,984 69.03 Norfolk Archdeaconry 01 Blofield 37,303 11.04 327,284 212,276 64.86 338,033 227,711 67.36 11 Depwade 46,736 16.20 280,831 137,847 49.09 288,484 155,218 53.80 02 Great Yarmouth 44,786 9.37 467,972 283,804 60.65 478,063 278,114 58.18 13 Humbleyard 47,747 11.00 437,949 192,301 43.91 433,952 205,085 47.26 14 Loddon 62,404 19.34 335,571 165,520 49.32 322,731 174,229 53.99 15 Lothingland 21,237 3.90 562,194 381,997 67.95 545,102 401,890 73.73 16 Redenhall 55,930 17.17 339,813 183,032 53.86 325,740 187,989 57.71 09 St Benet 36,663 9.24 380,642 229,484 60.29 396,955 243,433 61.33 17 Thetford & Rockland 31,271 10.39 314,266 182,806 58.17 300,933 192,966 64.12 Lynn Archdeaconry 18 Breckland 45,799 11.97 397,811 233,505 58.70 382,462 239,714 62.68 20 Burnham & Walsingham 63,028 15.65 396,393 241,163 60.84 402,850 256,123 63.58 12 Dereham in Mitford 43,605 12.03 353,955 223,631 63.18 362,376 208,125 57.43 21 Heacham & Rising 24,243 6.74 377,375 245,242 64.99 359,790 242,156 67.30 22 Holt 28,275 8.55 327,646 207,089 63.21 330,766 214,952 64.99 23 Lynn 10,805 3.30 330,152 196,022 59.37 326,964 187,510 57.35 07 Repps 0 0.00 383,729 278,123 72.48 382,728 285,790 74.67 03 08 Ingworth & Sparham 27,983 6.66 425,260 239,965 56.43 420,215 258,960 61.63 727,583 9.28 7,913,818 4,789,282 60.52 7,837,491 4,895,456 62.46 01/10/2019 NORWICH DIOCESAN BOARD OF FINANCE LTD DEANERY HISTORY REPORT MONTH September YEAR 2019 SUMMARY PARISH 2017 OUTST.
    [Show full text]
  • Norfolk. Boo 793
    TRADES DIRECTORY.] NORFOLK. BOO 793 Forster Wilson, Burnham Sutton, Lynn BOARDING HOUSES. Harris Job, Cliff hl. Gorleston, Yarmouth Gibson Thomas ~- Purtieet stree~, Lynn See also Apartments. Harrison Chas.Fredk.Low.clo~e,Norwch Hartley Henry'-' est, Upwell, Wisbech Barnard Mrs. G. S. 78 Prince of Wales Hart J. & Son, Thorpe, Norwrch Head Robert, Mangate street, Swaffham road Norwich Haylett George, Caister, Yarmouth High John M.U.I.B.P.A. 162 Middlegate Borrett Frederick, Sandringham house, Haylett James, Cai~ter, Yarmouth street, Yarmouth . Paget road, Yarmouth Haylett Waiter, Catster, Yarmouth H?well Rbt. High st. Wal~~ngham R.S.O Caston Mrs. H. 23 Trafalgar rd. Yarmth Hoey George, Quay Mill wharf, North KISby James, Outwell, '-" Isbech Cook Miss Sarah Ann, East Bill House q~ay, Yarmouth Lee James, tluton, '-''ymondham boardin~ establishment, Munde3ley Jumper W.S.Mundesley,North'-"'alsharn Mack Gilbert, Brunswick street, Cromer North Walsham ' King Mrs. Hannah, Caister, Yarmouth Maidstone Sl. back of Town hall, Aylsham Den ton J. C. St. George's pk. Yarmouth Knights Henry, Caister, Yarmouth Neal George, High street, Downham Downing Miss Louisa, Felixstowe house I Perfect T. Nelson rd. Gorleston, Yarmth Nunn Robert, Shelfhanger _road, Diss Langham road, YarmoutO. '1 Flatten John, Horning, ~orwich Oak ford Jn. & Son, Blackfriars st. Lynn Jay Mrs. E. 105 Pottergate st. Norwich : Plummer Robt. Leech,Caister, Yarmouth Peacock Hy. Wm.Marketpl.Ea.Derehm Lovelace James,West Cliff hotel,Cromer Reynolds Ueorge Henry, jun. Bridge st. Pegg Robt. Shirehall plain, Bolt R.S.O Metropolitan Boarding House (F. & H. Tbetford. See advertisement Richardson Geo. Norwich rd. Fakenham Hill, proprs.
    [Show full text]
  • Norfolk Through a Lens
    NORFOLK THROUGH A LENS A guide to the Photographic Collections held by Norfolk Library & Information Service 2 NORFOLK THROUGH A LENS A guide to the Photographic Collections held by Norfolk Library & Information Service History and Background The systematic collecting of photographs of Norfolk really began in 1913 when the Norfolk Photographic Survey was formed, although there are many images in the collection which date from shortly after the invention of photography (during the 1840s) and a great deal which are late Victorian. In less than one year over a thousand photographs were deposited in Norwich Library and by the mid- 1990s the collection had expanded to 30,000 prints and a similar number of negatives. The devastating Norwich library fire of 1994 destroyed around 15,000 Norwich prints, some of which were early images. Fortunately, many of the most important images were copied before the fire and those copies have since been purchased and returned to the library holdings. In 1999 a very successful public appeal was launched to replace parts of the lost archive and expand the collection. Today the collection (which was based upon the survey) contains a huge variety of material from amateur and informal work to commercial pictures. This includes newspaper reportage, portraiture, building and landscape surveys, tourism and advertising. There is work by the pioneers of photography in the region; there are collections by talented and dedicated amateurs as well as professional art photographers and early female practitioners such as Olive Edis, Viola Grimes and Edith Flowerdew. More recent images of Norfolk life are now beginning to filter in, such as a village survey of Ashwellthorpe by Richard Tilbrook from 1977, groups of Norwich punks and Norfolk fairs from the 1980s by Paul Harley and re-development images post 1990s.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents of Volume 14 Norwich Marriages 1813-37 (Are Distinguished by Letter Code, Given Below) Those from 1801-13 Have Also Been Transcribed and Have No Code
    Norfolk Family History Society Norfolk Marriages 1801-1837 The contents of Volume 14 Norwich Marriages 1813-37 (are distinguished by letter code, given below) those from 1801-13 have also been transcribed and have no code. ASt All Saints Hel St. Helen’s MyM St. Mary in the S&J St. Simon & St. And St. Andrew’s Jam St. James’ Marsh Jude Aug St. Augustine’s Jma St. John McC St. Michael Coslany Ste St. Stephen’s Ben St. Benedict’s Maddermarket McP St. Michael at Plea Swi St. Swithen’s JSe St. John Sepulchre McT St. Michael at Thorn Cle St. Clement’s Erh Earlham St. Mary’s Edm St. Edmund’s JTi St. John Timberhill Pau St. Paul’s Etn Eaton St. Andrew’s Eth St. Etheldreda’s Jul St. Julian’s PHu St. Peter Hungate GCo St. George Colegate Law St. Lawrence’s PMa St. Peter Mancroft Hei Heigham St. GTo St. George Mgt St. Margaret’s PpM St. Peter per Bartholomew Tombland MtO St. Martin at Oak Mountergate Lak Lakenham St. John Gil St. Giles’ MtP St. Martin at Palace PSo St. Peter Southgate the Baptist and All Grg St. Gregory’s MyC St. Mary Coslany Sav St. Saviour’s Saints The 25 Suffolk parishes Ashby Burgh Castle (Nfk 1974) Gisleham Kessingland Mutford Barnby Carlton Colville Gorleston (Nfk 1889) Kirkley Oulton Belton (Nfk 1974) Corton Gunton Knettishall Pakefield Blundeston Cove, North Herringfleet Lound Rushmere Bradwell (Nfk 1974) Fritton (Nfk 1974) Hopton (Nfk 1974) Lowestoft Somerleyton The Norfolk parishes 1 Acle 36 Barton Bendish St Andrew 71 Bodham 106 Burlingham St Edmond 141 Colney 2 Alburgh 37 Barton Bendish St Mary 72 Bodney 107 Burlingham
    [Show full text]
  • Habitats Regulations Assessment of the South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan
    Habitats Regulations Assessment of the South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan Regulation 18 HRA Report May 2021 Habitats Regulations Assessment of the South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan Regulation 18 HRA Report LC- 654 Document Control Box Client South Norfolk Council Habitats Regulations Assessment Report Title Regulation 18 – HRA Report Status FINAL Filename LC-654_South Norfolk_Regulation 18_HRA Report_8_140521SC.docx Date May 2021 Author SC Reviewed ND Approved ND Photo: Female broad bodied chaser by Shutterstock Regulation 18 – HRA Report May 2021 LC-654_South Norfolk_Regulation 18_HRA Report_8_140521SC.docx Contents 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose of this report ............................................................................................................................................... 1 2 The South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan ................................................................... 3 2.1 Greater Norwich Local Plan .................................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan ................................................................................ 3 2.3 Village Clusters ..........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • North Norfolk District Council (Alby
    DEFINITIVE STATEMENT OF PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY NORTH NORFOLK DISTRICT VOLUME I PARISH OF ALBY WITH THWAITE Footpath No. 1 (Middle Hill to Aldborough Mill). Starts from Middle Hill and runs north westwards to Aldborough Hill at parish boundary where it joins Footpath No. 12 of Aldborough. Footpath No. 2 (Alby Hill to All Saints' Church). Starts from Alby Hill and runs southwards to enter road opposite All Saints' Church. Footpath No. 3 (Dovehouse Lane to Footpath 13). Starts from Alby Hill and runs northwards, then turning eastwards, crosses Footpath No. 5 then again northwards, and continuing north-eastwards to field gate. Path continues from field gate in a south- easterly direction crossing the end Footpath No. 4 and U14440 continuing until it meets Footpath No.13 at TG 20567/34065. Footpath No. 4 (Park Farm to Sunday School). Starts from Park Farm and runs south westwards to Footpath No. 3 and U14440. Footpath No. 5 (Pack Lane). Starts from the C288 at TG 20237/33581 going in a northerly direction parallel and to the eastern boundary of the cemetery for a distance of approximately 11 metres to TG 20236/33589. Continuing in a westerly direction following the existing path for approximately 34 metres to TG 20201/33589 at the western boundary of the cemetery. Continuing in a generally northerly direction parallel to the western boundary of the cemetery for approximately 23 metres to the field boundary at TG 20206/33611. Continuing in a westerly direction parallel to and to the northern side of the field boundary for a distance of approximately 153 metres to exit onto the U440 road at TG 20054/33633.
    [Show full text]
  • Marriott's Way Circular Route Guide
    MARRIOTT’S WAY CIRCULAR ROUTE GUIDE WELCOME TO MARRIOTT’S WAY MARRIOTT’S WAY is a 26-mile linear trail for riders, walkers and cyclists. Opened in 1991, it follows part of the route of two former Victorian railway lines, The Midland and Great Northern (M&GN) and Great Eastern Railway (GER). It is named in honour of William Marriott, who was chief engineer and manager of the M&GN for 41 years between 1883 and 1924. Both lines were established in the 1880s to transport passengers, livestock and industrial freight. The two routes were joined by the ‘Themelthorpe Curve’ in 1960, which became the sharpest bend on the entire British railway network. Use of the lines reduced after the Second World War. Passenger traffic ceased in 1959, but the transport of concrete ensured that freight trains still used the lines until 1985. The seven circular walks and two cycle loops in this guide encourage you to head off the main Marriott’s Way route and explore the surrounding areas that the railway served. Whilst much has changed, there’s an abundance of hidden history to be found. Many of the churches, pubs, farms and station buildings along these circular routes would still be familiar to the railway passengers of 100 years ago. 2 Marriott’s Way is a County Wildlife Site and passes through many interesting landscapes rich in wonderful countryside, wildlife, sculpture and a wealth of local history. The walks and cycle loops described in these pages are well signposted by fingerposts and Norfolk Trails’ discs. You can find all the circular trails in this guide covered by OS Explorer Map 238.
    [Show full text]
  • Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm Appendix 22.14 Norfolk Vanguard Onshore Ecology Consultation Responses
    Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm Appendix 22.14 Norfolk Vanguard Onshore Ecology Consultation Responses Preliminary Environmental Information Report Volume 3 Author: Royal HaskoningDHV Applicant: Norfolk Boreas Limited Document Reference: PB5640-005-2214 Date: October 2018 Photo: Ormonde Offshore Wind Farm Date Issue Remarks / Reason for Issue Author Checked Approved No. 20/07/18 01D First draft for Norfolk Boreas Limited review GC CD DT 20/09/18 01F Final for PEIR submission GC CD AD/JL Preliminary Environmental Information Report Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm PB5640-005-2214 October 2018 Page i Table of Contents 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1 2 Consultation responses Norfolk Vanguard ............................................................... 1 3 References ........................................................................................................... 27 Preliminary Environmental Information Report Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm PB5640-005-2214 October 2018 Page ii Tables Table 2.1 Norfolk Vanguard Consultation Responses 2 Preliminary Environmental Information Report Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm PB5640-005-2214 October 2018 Page iii Glossary of Acronyms CoCP Code of Construction Practice DCO Development Consent Order EIA Environmental Impact Assessment ES Environmental Statement ETG Expert Topic Group HVAC High Voltage Alternating Current HVDC High Voltage Direct Current PEIR Preliminary Environmental Information Report SoS Secretary of State Preliminary Environmental Information Report Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm PB5640-005-2214 October 2018 Page iv This page is intentionally blank. Preliminary Environmental Information Report Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm PB5640-005-2214 October 2018 Page v 1 Introduction 1. Consultation is a key driver of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process, and throughout the lifecycle of the project, from the initial stages through to consent and post-consent. 2.
    [Show full text]
  • David Tyldesley and Associates Planning, Landscape and Environmental Consultants
    DAVID TYLDESLEY AND ASSOCIATES PLANNING, LANDSCAPE AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS Habitat Regulations Assessment: Breckland Council Submission Core Strategy and Development Control Policies Document Durwyn Liley, Rachel Hoskin, John Underhill-Day & David Tyldesley 1 DRAFT Date: 7th November 2008 Version: Draft Recommended Citation: Liley, D., Hoskin, R., Underhill-Day, J. & Tyldesley, D. (2008). Habitat Regulations Assessment: Breckland Council Submission Core Strategy and Development Control Policies Document. Footprint Ecology, Wareham, Dorset. Report for Breckland District Council. 2 Summary This document records the results of a Habitat Regulations Assessment (HRA) of Breckland District Council’s Core Strategy. The Breckland District lies in an area of considerable importance for nature conservation with a number of European Sites located within and just outside the District. The range of sites, habitats and designations is complex. Taking an area of search of 20km around the District boundary as an initial screening for relevant protected sites the assessment identified five different SPAs, ten different SACs and eight different Ramsar sites. Following on from this initial screening the assessment identifies the following potential adverse effects which are addressed within the appropriate assessment: • Reduction in the density of Breckland SPA Annex I bird species (stone curlew, nightjar, woodlark) near to new housing. • Increased levels of recreational activity resulting in increased disturbance to Breckland SPA Annex I bird species (stone curlew, nightjar, woodlark). • Increased levels of people on and around the heaths, resulting in an increase in urban effects such as increased fire risk, fly-tipping, trampling. • Increased levels of recreation to the Norfolk Coast (including the Wash), potentially resulting in disturbance to interest features and other recreational impacts.
    [Show full text]
  • Site Improvement Plan Norfolk Valley Fens
    Improvement Programme for England's Natura 2000 Sites (IPENS) Planning for the Future Site Improvement Plan Norfolk Valley Fens Site Improvement Plans (SIPs) have been developed for each Natura 2000 site in England as part of the Improvement Programme for England's Natura 2000 sites (IPENS). Natura 2000 sites is the combined term for sites designated as Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) and Special Protected Areas (SPA). This work has been financially supported by LIFE, a financial instrument of the European Community. The plan provides a high level overview of the issues (both current and predicted) affecting the condition of the Natura 2000 features on the site(s) and outlines the priority measures required to improve the condition of the features. It does not cover issues where remedial actions are already in place or ongoing management activities which are required for maintenance. The SIP consists of three parts: a Summary table, which sets out the priority Issues and Measures; a detailed Actions table, which sets out who needs to do what, when and how much it is estimated to cost; and a set of tables containing contextual information and links. Once this current programme ends, it is anticipated that Natural England and others, working with landowners and managers, will all play a role in delivering the priority measures to improve the condition of the features on these sites. The SIPs are based on Natural England's current evidence and knowledge. The SIPs are not legal documents, they are live documents that will be updated to reflect changes in our evidence/knowledge and as actions get underway.
    [Show full text]