DOCSLIB.ORG

The Broadland Rivers Management Catchment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Broadland Rivers Management Catchment The Broadland Rivers Management Catchment Figure 1 - Remains of Brograve windmill on the River Thurne (courtesy of Bridget Marr). A summary of information about the water environment in the Broadland Rivers Management Catchment We are the Environment Agency. We protect and improve the environment and make it a better place for people and wildlife. We operate at the place where environmental change has its greatest impact on people’s lives. We reduce the risks to people and properties from flooding; make sure there is enough water for people and wildlife; protect and improve air, land and water quality and apply the environmental standards within which industry can operate. Acting to reduce climate change and helping people and wildlife adapt to its consequences are at the heart of all that we do. We cannot do this alone. We work closely with a wide range of partners including government, business, local councils, other agencies, civil society groups and the communities we serve. Published by: Environment Agency Further copies of this report are available Horizon House, Deanery Road, on the e-consultation tool: Bristol BS1 5AH www.gov.uk/government/consultations/update-to- Email: enquiries@environment- the-draft-river-basin-management-plans and via our agency.gov.uk National Customer Contact Centre: www.gov.uk/environment-agency T: 03708 506506 Email: [email protected]. © Environment Agency 2014 All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. 2 Contents The Broadland Rivers Management Catchment ........................................................ 1 Contents ..................................................................................................................... 3 1 Your views count ................................................................................................. 5 2 The Broadland Rivers Management Catchment ................................................. 8 2.1 Protected areas ............................................................................................ 9 2.2 Status of waters ......................................................................................... 10 2.3 Improvements to how water bodies are assessed ..................................... 11 2.4 Investigating the water environment in the Broadland Rivers Management Catchment ............................................................................................................ 12 2.5 Challenges and choices consultation 2013 ................................................ 13 2.6 Taking action in partnership ....................................................................... 14 2.7 Measures that could improve the water environment ................................. 15 2.8 Economic appraisal and environmental assessment of measures to improve the water environment .......................................................................................... 16 2.9 Proposed long term objectives ................................................................... 17 2.10 Links to other management plans .............................................................. 18 3 Operational catchments .................................................................................... 19 3.1 Bure Operational Catchment ...................................................................... 19 3.2 Waveney Operational Catchment .............................................................. 28 3.3 Wensum Operational Catchment ............................................................... 37 3.4 Yare Operational Catchment ...................................................................... 46 4 What do you think? ........................................................................................... 55 4.1 How to respond .......................................................................................... 55 4.2 What the Environment Agency will use the responses for ......................... 56 4.3 How the Environment Agency will use your information ............................ 56 Figure 1 - Remains of Brograve windmill on the River Thurne (courtesy of Bridget Marr). .......................................................................................................................... 1 Figure 2 - The Anglian River Basin District and the management catchments within it. ................................................................................................................................ 7 Figure 3 - The Broadland Rivers Management Catchment and the operational catchments within it. ................................................................................................... 8 Table 1. Protected areas within the management catchment. .................................... 9 Figure 4 - Classification of all water bodies in the Broadland Rivers catchment in cycle 1. ..................................................................................................................... 10 Figure 5 - Confirmed reasons for not achieving good status of water bodies in the Broadland Rivers catchment by type and source sector. ......................................... 13 3 Table 2. Status / potential of water bodies in the management catchment using new building blocks. ......................................................................................................... 11 Table 3. Measures that could improve the water environment in the management catchment. ................................................................................................................ 16 Figure 6 - View of the River Bure at Buxton (courtesy of Bridget Marr). .................. 19 Figure 7 - Map of the Bure operational catchment. ................................................. 19 Figure 8 - Classification of all water bodies in the Bure catchment in cycle 1. ......... 20 Figure 9 - Classification and long term objectives of all water bodies in the Bure catchment in cycle 2. ................................................................................................ 20 Figure 10 - Confirmed reasons for not achieving good status of water bodies in the Bure catchment by type and source sector. ............................................................. 21 Table 4. Measures that could improve the water environment in the Bure Operational Catchment. ............................................................................................................... 22 Table 5. Plans and actions that could deliver improvement before 2021 in the Bure Operational Catchment. ........................................................................................... 27 Figure 11 - The Waveney at Homersfield after removal of redundant structure (courtesy of Will Akast). ............................................................................................ 28 Figure 12 - The Waveney operational catchment. ................................................... 28 Figure 13 - Classification of all water bodies in the Waveney catchment in cycle 1. 29 Figure 14 - Classification and long term objectives of all water bodies in the Waveney catchment in cycle 2. ................................................................................ 29 Figure 15 - Confirmed reasons for not achieving good status of water bodies in the Waveney catchment by type and source sector. ...................................................... 30 Table 6. Measures that could improve the water environment in the Waveney Operational Catchment. ........................................................................................... 31 Table 7. Plans and actions that could deliver improvement before 2021 in the Waveney Operational Catchment............................................................................. 36 Figure 16 - Restoration work on the River Tat (courtesy of Bridget Marr). .............. 37 Figure 17 - The Wensum Operational Catchment. .................................................. 37 Figure 18 - Classification of all water bodies in the Wensum catchment in cycle 1 Figure 19 - Classification and long term objectives of all water bodies in the Wensum catchment in cycle 2. ................................................................................................ 38 Figure 20 - Confirmed reasons for not achieving good status of water bodies in the Wensum catchment by type and source sector. ....................................................... 39 Table 8. Measures that could improve the water environment in the Wensum Operational Catchment. ........................................................................................... 39 Table 9. Plans and actions that could deliver improvement before 2021 in the Wensum Operational Catchment. ............................................................................ 44 Figure 21 - View of the River Tiffey at Carleton Forehoe (courtesy of Brian Hudson). ................................................................................................................................. 46 Figure 22 - The Yare Operational Catchment. ......................................................... 46 Figure 23 - Classification of all water bodies in the Yare catchment in cycle 1. ...... 47 Figure 24 - Classification and long term objectives of all water bodies in the Yare catchment in cycle 2. ................................................................................................ 47 Figure 25 - Confirmed reasons
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ESSD Appendix D Datasheet
    Envirocheck ® Report: Datasheet Order Details: Order Number: 254632812_1_1 Customer Reference: TAR/MG/LBA/5630/01 National Grid Reference: 621960, 302820 Slice: A Site Area (Ha): 21.31 Search Buffer (m): 1000 Site Details: Site at Mangreen Hall Norfolk Client Details: J Amphlett MJCA Baddesley Collier Offices Main Road Baxterley Atherstone Warwickshire CV9 2LE Order Number: 254632812_1_1 Date: 27-Aug-2020 rpr_ec_datasheet v53.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Contents Report Section Page Number Summary - Agency & Hydrological 1 Waste 38 Hazardous Substances - Geological 39 Industrial Land Use 42 Sensitive Land Use 43 Data Currency 44 Data Suppliers 48 Useful Contacts 49 Introduction The Environment Act 1995 has made site sensitivity a key issue, as the legislation pays as much attention to the pathways by which contamination could spread, and to the vulnerable targets of contamination, as it does the potential sources of contamination. For this reason, Landmark's Site Sensitivity maps and Datasheet(s) place great emphasis on statutory data provided by the Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales and the Scottish Environment Protection Agency; it also incorporates data from Natural England (and the Scottish and Welsh equivalents) and Local Authorities; and highlights hydrogeological features required by environmental and geotechnical consultants. It does not include any information concerning past uses of land. The datasheet is produced by querying the Landmark database to a distance defined by the client from a site boundary provided by the client. In this datasheet the National Grid References (NGRs) are rounded to the nearest 10m in accordance with Landmark's agreements with a number of Data Suppliers.
    [Show full text]
  • Hannah Booth Report Greater Norwich Water Cycle Study 2020-01-23
    Greater Norwich Water Cycle Study Greater Norwich Authorities Draft for consultation Project number: 60593120 February 2020 Greater Norwich Water Cycle Study Draft for consultation Greater Norwich Authorities AECOM Quality information Prepared by Checked by Verified by Approved by Hannah Booth Amy Ruocco Carl Pelling Amy Ruocco Graduate Water Senior Water Consultant Regional Director Senior Water Consultant Consultant Laura Soothill Graduate Engineer Christina Bakopoulou Flood Risk Engineer Revision History Revision Revision date Details Authorized Name Position 01 27/11/2019 Draft for comment CP Carl Pelling Regional Director 02 28/01/2020 Draft for CP Carl Pelling Regional Director consultation 03 05/02/2020 Draft for CP Carl Pelling Regional Director consultation Position statement February 2020 This report represents a working draft of the GNLP Outline Water Cycle Study. Consultation is ongoing with Anglian Water Services, the Environment Agency and Natural England who have not yet signed off the study conclusions and it is therefore subject to change. Further updates are also required to align with some recent changes to housing numbers and extension of the plan period to 2038 agreed in December 2019. These will be incorporated into the final report. Prepared for: Broadland District Council, Norwich City Council and South Norfolk District Council Prepared by: AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited Midpoint, Alencon Link Basingstoke Hampshire RG21 7PP United Kingdom T: +44(0)1256 310200 aecom.com © 2020 AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (“AECOM”) for sole use of our client (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client.
    [Show full text]
  • Fisheries, Recreation Conser Va Tion and Navigation
    FISHERIES, RECREATION CONSER VA TION AND NAVIGATION ANGLIAN REGION ANNUAL REPORT 1996/97 FRCN ANNUAL REPORT 1996/97 CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 PROJECTS IN CAPITAL AND REVENUE PROGRAMMES 2.1 FISHERIES 2.2 RECREATION 2.3 CONSERVATION 2.4 NAVIGATION 2.5 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2.6 MULTIFUNCTIONAL 3.0 POLICY ISSUES 3.1 FISHERIES 3.1.1 Fishing Rod Licence Promotion and Enforcement 3.1.2 National and Regional Fisheries Byelaws 3.1.3 Net Limitation Order 3.1.4 Honorary Fisheries Bailiffs 3.2 CONSERVATION 3.2.1 Biodiversity 3.2.2 Habitats Directive 3.2.3 Drought 3.2.4 Flood Defence and Conservation Review of Flood Defence Maintenance 3.2.5 Wet Fens for the Future 3.3 NAVIGATION 3.3.1 National Boat Safety Scheme 3.3.2 Navigation Signage 3.3.3 Reciprocal Arrangements 3.3.4 Benchmark Exercise 3.3.5 Navigation Asset Review 4.0 MONITORING 4.1 FISHERIES SURVEYS AND INVESTIGATIONS 4.1.1 Analysis of Change 4.1.2 Additional Surveys 4.2 CONSERVATION SURVEYS 4.2.1 River Corridor Surveys (RCS) 4.2.2 River Habitat Surveys (RHS) 4.2.3 Rivers Environmental Database (REDS) 4.3 NAVIGATION SURVEYS LIST OF PHOTOGRAPHS INCLUDED IN THE FRCN ANNUAL REPORT (1996-97) Page n a Photo 1 Croys on the Little Ouse at Santon Downham 2 Photo 2 The willow croys installed on the Relief Channel 4 Photo 3 River Witham tree planting, Long Bennington 5 Photo 4 Work beginning on the Louth Canal fish refuge 6 Photo5 The completed fish refuge 6 Photo 6 Harper’s Brook before the habitat restoration project had begun 7 Photo 7 The new riffle created on the Harper’s Brook 8 Photo 8
    [Show full text]
  • White Cottage Saxlingham Lane | Lower Tasburgh | Norfolk | NR15 1LP PICTURE PERFECT
    White Cottage Saxlingham Lane | Lower Tasburgh | Norfolk | NR15 1LP PICTURE PERFECT “The quintessential country cottage; painted white and topped with thatch of Norfolk reed. Lovely green gardens lead you down to the river, the water trickling by – a beautiful setting indeed. Inside you’ll find beams and an inglenook fireplace, the home carefully extended to offer comfort and space. It’s peaceful and private, but you’re part of the village – altogether this home is a wonderful place!” • A very pretty, Detached, Grade II Listed Thatched Cottage enjoying a wonderful Country Village Situation • The Property includes River Frontage and stands in Grounds of 0.67 of an acre (stms) • Four Bedrooms; Three Bathrooms; Three Receptions • Kitchen with Breakfast Area and Seperate Utility Room • The ability to incorporate a Self-Contained Annexe if Required • Stunning Original Character can be Found Throughout • Detached Double Garage with Studio/Home Office Above • Further Range of Timber Outbuildings sitting in Formal Gardens • The Accommodation extends to 2,037sq.ft • No EPC Required A very pretty, Grade II listed thatched cottage in an idyllic setting with generous gardens leading down to the river, this is sure to capture anyone’s imagination! It’s a haven for wildlife and would also be a wonderful place in which to raise a family, while the detached garage with self-contained studio is a fabulous home office or guest accommodation and could even be used as a holiday let. The vibrant community here will welcome you in: Tasburgh offers something for everyone. Enjoy rural village life without wandering too far from the city – the best of both worlds! A Home With Heart Dating back to the early 18th century, the cottage has heaps of character.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Flood Risk Assessment
    Greater Norwich Area Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Final Report: Level 1 November 2017 This page has intentionally been left blank 2017s5962 Greater Norwich Area SFRA Final v2.0.docx JBA Project Manager Claire Gardner The Library St Philips Courtyard Church Hill COLESHILL Warwickshire B46 3AD Revision History Revision Ref / Date Issued Amendments Issued to Draft rev 1.0 / June 2017 DRAFT for comment SFRA Steering Group Final Draft rev 2.0 / August 2017 Final DRAFT for comment SFRA Steering Group Final rev 1.0 / October 2017 Final report SFRA Steering Group Final rev 2.0 / November 2017 Final Report – updated with SFRA Steering Group minor text amendments Contract This report describes work commissioned on behalf of a consortium of local planning authorities in Norfolk: • Broadland District Council • Great Yarmouth Borough Council • Borough Council of King’s Lynn and West Norfolk • Norwich City Council • North Norfolk District Council • South Norfolk Council • Broads Authority Each authority was represented as part of a steering group for the SFRA. The steering group’s representative for the contract was North Norfolk’s Policy Team Leader, Iain Withington. Sophie Dusting, Freyja Scarborough and Ffion Wilson of JBA Consulting carried out this work. Prepared by .................................................. Sophie Dusting BSc MEPS Analyst ....................................................................... Ffion Wilson BSc MSc Analyst ....................................................................... Freyja Scarborough BSc MSc Assistant Analyst Reviewed by ................................................. Claire Gardner BSc MSc MCIWEM C.WEM Chartered Senior Analyst ....................................................................... Philip Bennett-Lloyd BSc DipMgmt CMLI MCIEEM MCIWEM C.WEM C.Env Technical Director 2017s5962 Greater Norwich Area SFRA Final v2.0.docx Purpose This document has been prepared as a Final Report for the Greater Norwich Partnership.
    [Show full text]
  • Emergency Response Plan 2006
    Emergency Response Plan 2006 Protection marking: Version: 1 Date: April 2006 Foreword The Breckland Council Emergency Response Plan replaces all previous editions, which should now be destroyed. Under the provisions of the Civil Contingencies Act 2004, the requirement to have in place adequate Emergency Planning and Business Continuity strategies is significantly enhanced. It is important that we all recognise the statutory requirements which have to be in place, adequate emergency response arrangements etc is placed upon the entire Breckland Council staff and not just one department or team. We must have staff adequately trained and prepared to undertake their ‘emergency roles’ and the District Emergency Planning Officer will continue her work to ensure that Breckland Council is ready to meet its commitments under a single or multi agency response to any major or significant emergency which could occur with the County. The Emergency Response Plan will be distributed to appropriate personnel throughout the Authority. Many of the arrangements outlined in the various sections of this plan are generic and the principles will be applied to our response to any major or significant emergency situation, whether it is purely one which affects the internal operations of Breckland Council or the wider community of Norfolk. This document should be read in conjunction with the Breckland Council Business Continuity Plans. All staff should take every opportunity to understand the role of Breckland Council when dealing with major or significant emergencies.
    [Show full text]
  • The State of England's Chalk Streams
    FUNDED WITH CONTRIBUTIONS FROM REPORT UK 2014 The State of England’s Chalk Streams This report has been written by Rose O’Neill and Kathy Hughes on behalf of WWF-UK with CONTENTS help and assistance from many of the people and organisations hard at work championing England’s chalk streams. In particular the authors would EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 like to thank Charles Rangeley-Wilson, Lawrence Talks, Sarah Smith, Mike Dobson, Colin Fenn, 8 Chris Mainstone, Chris Catling, Mike Acreman, FOREWORD Paul Quinn, David Bradley, Dave Tickner, Belinda by Charles Rangeley-Wilson Fletcher, Dominic Gogol, Conor Linsted, Caroline Juby, Allen Beechey, Haydon Bailey, Liz Lowe, INTRODUCTION 13 Bella Davies, David Cheek, Charlie Bell, Dave Stimpson, Ellie Powers, Mark Gallant, Meyrick THE STATE OF ENGLAND’S CHALK STREAMS 2014 19 Gough, Janina Gray, Ali Morse, Paul Jennings, Ken Caustin, David Le Neve Foster, Shaun Leonard, Ecological health of chalk streams 20 Alex Inman and Fran Southgate. This is a WWF- Protected chalk streams 25 UK report, however, and does not necessarily Aquifer health 26 reflect the views of each of the contributors. Chalk stream species 26 Since 2012, WWF-UK, Coca-Cola Great Britain and Pressures on chalk streams 31 Coca-Cola Enterprises have been working together Conclusions 42 to secure a thriving future for English rivers. The partnership has focused on improving the health A MANIFESTO FOR CHALK STREAMS 45 of two chalk streams directly linked to Coca-Cola operations: the Nar catchment in Norfolk (where AN INDEX OF ENGLISH CHALK STREAMS 55 some of the sugar beet used in Coca-Cola’s drinks is grown) and the Cray in South London, near 60 to Coca-Cola Enterprises’ Sidcup manufacturing GLOSSARY site.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Norwich Local Plan Site Proposals Document
    Greater Norwich Local Plan Site Proposals document Contents Page Page 1 Introduction 5 2 Settlement Summaries and Sites 12 3 Broadland 12 o Horsford 56 o Acle 16 o Horsham & Newton St. Faiths 61 o Attlebridge 17 o Horstead & Stanninghall 64 o Aylsham 21 o Lingwood & Burlingham 65 o Beighton 22 o Marsham 68 o Blofield 24 o Panxworth 71 o Blofield Heath 26 o Postwick 72 o Brundall 28 o Rackheath 75 o Buxton with Lamas 30 o Reedham 78 o Cantley 31 o Reepham 79 o Cawston 33 o Salhouse 83 o Coltishall & Horstead 35 o South Walsham 87 o Crostwick 36 o Spixworth 89 o Drayton 40 o Sprowston 90 o Felthorpe 41 o Strumpshaw 94 o Foulsham 43 o Taverham 96 o Frettenham 44 o Thorpe St. Andrew 98 o Gt & Lt Plumstead 47 o Weston Longville 101 o Gt Witchingham & Lenwade 49 o Woodbastwick 102 o Hainford 51 o Wroxham 103 o Hellesdon 53 o Hevingham 54 o Honningham 2 4 Norwich 105 5 South Norfolk 125 X o Alpington & Yelverton 125 o Hingham 226 o Ashby St Mary 126 o Keswick 230 o Aslacton 127 o Ketteringham 232 o Ashwellthorpe & Fundenhall 130 o Kirby Cane 234 o 132 236 Barford o Little Melton o Barnham Broom 134 o Loddon & Chedgrave 240 o Bawburgh 136 o Long Stratton 244 o Bergh Apton 139 o Marlingford & Colton 247 o Bixley 142 o Morley 250 o Bracon Ash 144 o Mulbarton 252 o Bramerton 147 o Mundham 254 o Bressingham 148 o Needham 255 o Brockdish (inc Thorpe Abbotts) 149 o Newton Flotman 257 o Brooke 150 o Norton Subcourse 259 o Broome 153 o Poringland 260 o Bunwell 155 o Pulham Market 265 o Burston and Shimpling 158 o Pulham St Mary 267 o Caistor St Edmund
    [Show full text]
  • Tactical Flood Response Plan Part One
    OFFICIAL Tactical Flood Response Plan Part One Version 5.1 Author NRF Severe Weather & Flood Risk Group Reviewed by NRF Severe Weather & Flood Risk Authorised by Environment Agency Next review date June 2018 OFFICIAL Page 1 of 65 OFFICIAL Foreword This document has been produced after consultation with Category 1 and 2 Responders (as defined within the Civil Contingencies Act 2004), through the Norfolk Resilience Forum. It provides guidance by which Norfolk can be suitably prepared to respond to an actual or potential major flooding emergency, whereby the combined resources of numerous agencies are required. It will be used by these agencies when information is received or events occur that require a coordinated response at the tactical level. Tom McCabe NRF Executive Lead – Protection Capability Workstream Norfolk County Council OFFICIAL Page 2 of 65 OFFICIAL Table of Contents Foreword .............................................................................................................................................................................................2 Purpose ...............................................................................................................................................................................................8 Local Considerations: ........................................................................................................................................................................8 Protocols .............................................................................................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Environment Agency Anglian Region Strategy for Groundwater
    £A-Ari0liAn W-uVer R^'Source.a ^ o x i3 Environment Agency Anglian Region Strategy for Groundwater Investigations and Modelling: Yare and North Norfolk Areas Scoping Study 27 January 2000 Entec UK Limited E n v ir o n m e n t A g e n c y NATIONAL LIBRARY & INFORMATION SERVICE ANGLIAN REGION Kingfisher House, Goldhay Way, Orton Goldhay. Peterborough PE2 5ZR En v ir o n m e n t Ag e n c y Report for Environment Agency Environment Agency Kingfisher House Anglian Region Goldhay Way Orton Goldhay Peterborough Strategy for PE2OZR Groundwater Main Contributors Investigations and Stuart Sutton Modelling: Yare and Tim Lewis Ben Fretwell North Norfolk Areas Issued by Scoping Study Tim Lewis 27 January 2000 Entec UK Limited Approved by Stuart Sutton Entec UK Limited 160-162 Abbey Forcgatc Shrewsbury Shropshire SY26BZ England Tel: +44 (0) 1743 342000 Fax: +44 (0) 1743 342010 f:\data\data\projects\hm-250\0073 2( 15770)\docs\n085i 3 .doc Certificate No. FS 34171 In accordance with an environmentally responsible approach, this report is printed on recycled paper produced from 100V. post-consumer waste. Contents 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Strategy for Groundwater Investigations and Modelling 1 1.2 Structure of Strategy Projects and Approach to Seeking Approval 2 1.3 Organisation of this Report 3 2. Description of the Yare & North Norfolk Groundwater Resource Investigation Area and Current Understanding of the Hydrogeological System 7 2.1 Introduction 7 2.2 Location 7 2.3 Geology 7 2.4 Hydrology and Drainage 8 2.5 Basic Conceptual Hydrogeological Understanding 9 2.6 Water Resources 11 2.7 Conservation Interest 13 3.
    [Show full text]
  • TROWSE NEW PRIMARY SCHOOL FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT And
    TROWSE NEW PRIMARY SCHOOL TROWSE NEWTON FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT and DRAINAGE STRATEGY On behalf of Norfolk County Council Children’s Services Report 17-1-1095/FRA Rev B August 2018 Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Context 1 1.2 Development Site and Location 1 1.3 Development Proposals 5 1.4 Sequential Test 6 1.5 Exception Test 6 1.6 Climate Change 7 2 Sources of Flood Risk 8 2.1 Flood Risk Assessment 8 2.2 Location Of Main Rivers and watercourses 9 2.3 Fluvial Flooding 10 2.4 Surface Water Flooding 11 2.5 Topography 12 2.6 Site Ground Investigation 12 2.7 Existing Public Sewers 14 3 Surface Water Flood Risk Management 15 3.1 Catchment Area 15 3.2 Sustainable Drainage 15 3.3 Surface Water Drainage Strategy 17 3.4 Disposal of Foul Water 20 3.5 Occupants and Users Of The Development 20 3.6 Maintenance and Management 20 3.7 Residual Flood Risk 20 4 Conclusions and Recommendations 22 APPENDICES A Site Location Plan Norfolk Homes Foul and Surface Water Plan – 5903756 School Site Layout Topography B Environment Agency Maps British Geological Survey Maps Anglian Water Sewers C Micro Drainage Calculations HR Wallingford Greenfield Runoff D Drainage Strategy; Drainage Maintenance Plan Executive Summary Client Director of Children’s Services, Norfolk County Council Site Trowse New Primary School Off White Horse Lane, Trowse Newton, Norwich, Site Location NR14 8GD (nearest). National Grid 624662, 306406 Reference Approximate Site 1 ha Area Elevations range from approximately Topography 15m OD in the south east to 10m OD in the north west Current Land and Undeveloped Agricultural land to present day Historic Site Use INFORMATION Proposed New Primary School and Nursery SITE SITE Development Planning Authority Norfolk County Council Local Authority South Norfolk Council The site lies within the Environment Agency Flood Zone 1 (FZ1) Flood Zone Defined as being at low risk of river or sea flooding.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1 Water Resource Zone Characteristics Contents
    Drought Plan 2019 Appendix 1 Water Resource Zone Characteristics Contents Water Resource Zone Characteristics 3 Area 1: Lincolnshire and Nottinghamshire 5 Central Lincolnshire 5 Bourne 7 East Lincolnshire 8 Nottinghamshire 10 South Lincolnshire 11 Area 2: Ruthamford 12 Ruthamford Central 12 Ruthamford North 13 Ruthamford South 15 Ruthamford West 17 Area 3: Fenland 18 North Fenland 18 South Fenland 19 Area 4: Norfolk 20 Happisburgh 20 North Norfolk Coast 21 North Norfolk Rural 23 Norwich and The Broads 25 South Norfolk Rural 27 Area 5: East Sufflok and Essex 28 Central Essex 28 East Suffolk 29 South Essex 31 Area 6: Cambridgeshire and West Suffolk 33 Cheveley, Ely, Newmarket, Sudbury, Ixworth, and Bury Haverhill 33 Thetford 36 Area 7: Hartlepool 37 Hartlepool 37 2 Water Resource Zone Characteristics The uneven nature of climate, drought, growth and List of WRMP 2019 WRZs, in order of discussion: environmental impacts across our region means we have developed Water Resource Zones (WRZs). WRZs Area 1: Lincolnshire and Nottinghamshire are the geographical areas used to develop forecasts Central Lincolnshire of supply and demand and supply-demand balances. Bourne The WRZ describes an area within which supply infrastructure and demand centres are linked such East Lincolnshire that customers in the WRZ experience the same risk Nottinghamshire of supply failure. These were reviewed in the Water South Lincolnshire Resources Management Plan (WRMP) 2019 and have changed since the last WRMP and Drought Plan. Area 2: Ruthamford Ruthamford Central Overall, we have increased the number of WRZs from 19 at WRMP 2015 to 28 for WRMP 2019, including Ruthamford North the addition of South Humber Bank which is a non- Ruthamford South potable WRZ that sits within Central Lincolnshire.
    [Show full text]