DOCSLIB.ORG

Hannah Booth Report Greater Norwich Water Cycle Study 2020-01-23

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hannah Booth Report Greater Norwich Water Cycle Study 2020-01-23 Greater Norwich Water Cycle Study Greater Norwich Authorities Draft for consultation Project number: 60593120 February 2020 Greater Norwich Water Cycle Study Draft for consultation Greater Norwich Authorities AECOM Quality information Prepared by Checked by Verified by Approved by Hannah Booth Amy Ruocco Carl Pelling Amy Ruocco Graduate Water Senior Water Consultant Regional Director Senior Water Consultant Consultant Laura Soothill Graduate Engineer Christina Bakopoulou Flood Risk Engineer Revision History Revision Revision date Details Authorized Name Position 01 27/11/2019 Draft for comment CP Carl Pelling Regional Director 02 28/01/2020 Draft for CP Carl Pelling Regional Director consultation 03 05/02/2020 Draft for CP Carl Pelling Regional Director consultation Position statement February 2020 This report represents a working draft of the GNLP Outline Water Cycle Study. Consultation is ongoing with Anglian Water Services, the Environment Agency and Natural England who have not yet signed off the study conclusions and it is therefore subject to change. Further updates are also required to align with some recent changes to housing numbers and extension of the plan period to 2038 agreed in December 2019. These will be incorporated into the final report. Prepared for: Broadland District Council, Norwich City Council and South Norfolk District Council Prepared by: AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited Midpoint, Alencon Link Basingstoke Hampshire RG21 7PP United Kingdom T: +44(0)1256 310200 aecom.com © 2020 AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (“AECOM”) for sole use of our client (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM. February 2020 i Project Reference: 60593120 Greater Norwich Water Cycle Study Draft for consultation Greater Norwich Authorities AECOM Table of Contents List of Acronyms ......................................................................................................... v Executive summary .................................................................................................... vi Wastewater Strategy ............................................................................................................................................... vi Water Supply Strategy ............................................................................................................................................ vi 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ............................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Study Governance .................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 WCS Scope .............................................................................................................................................. 2 1.4 Key Assumptions and Conditions ............................................................................................................. 2 1.5 Report Structure ....................................................................................................................................... 3 2 Study Drivers ................................................................................................... 4 2.1 OFWAT Price Review ............................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Water Framework Directive....................................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Habitats Directive ...................................................................................................................................... 5 3 Proposed Growth ............................................................................................. 6 3.1 Preferred Growth Strategy ........................................................................................................................ 6 4 Wastewater Treatment Strategy ...................................................................... 7 4.1 Wastewater in the Greater Norwich Area .................................................................................................. 7 4.2 Management of WRC Discharges ............................................................................................................ 8 4.3 WFD Compliance ...................................................................................................................................... 9 4.4 Habitats Directive .................................................................................................................................... 10 4.5 Wastewater Assessment Overview ......................................................................................................... 11 4.6 WRC Headroom Assessment ................................................................................................................. 13 4.7 RQP Water Quality Assessment ............................................................................................................. 19 4.8 Load Standstill Results ........................................................................................................................... 30 4.9 Ecological Appraisal ................................................................................................................................ 34 4.10 Wastewater Treatment Overview ............................................................................................................ 39 5 Water Supply Strategy ................................................................................... 46 5.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 46 5.2 Abstraction Licensing Strategies ............................................................................................................. 46 5.3 Water Resource Planning ....................................................................................................................... 47 5.4 Water Resource Planning in the Greater Norwich Area .......................................................................... 47 5.5 Water Efficiency Plan .............................................................................................................................. 52 5.6 Water Neutrality ...................................................................................................................................... 53 6 Major Development Site Assessment ............................................................ 58 6.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 58 6.2 Assessment Methodologies .................................................................................................................... 58 6.3 Site assessment table summary ............................................................................................................. 59 7 Water Cycle Strategy Summary and Recommendations ............................... 65 7.1 Wastewater and Water Quality ............................................................................................................... 65 7.2 Water Resources .................................................................................................................................... 65 7.3 Recommendations and Policy ................................................................................................................ 67 7.4 Policy Recommendations Overview ....................................................................................................... 67 7.5 Further Recommendations ..................................................................................................................... 68 Appendix A Policy and Legislative Drivers Shaping the WCS .................................. 70 Appendix B Relevant Planning Documents to the WCS........................................... 72 Appendix C WRC Capacity Assessment results ...................................................... 73 C.1 Modelling assumptions and input data .................................................................................................... 73 C.2 Assessment Techniques ......................................................................................................................... 73 February 2020 ii Project Reference: 60593120 Greater Norwich Water Cycle Study Draft for consultation Greater Norwich Authorities AECOM C.3 Headroom Assessment ........................................................................................................................... 74 C.4 Water Quality Assessment .....................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Annex 7: Completed Workbook Trial for New Anglia
    Annex 7: Completed workbook trial for New Anglia RPA | Annexes Local Economic Development and the Environment (LEDE) workbook Local Economic Development and the Environment (LEDE) project researcher workbook April 2013 1 Local Economic Development and the Environment (LEDE) workbook Organizational details Name of LEP: New Anglia Lead responsible officer for LEP Name: Role: Address: Telephone number: Mobile telephone number: E-mail address: Researcher Name: Risk & Policy Analysts Ltd. Organization: Risk & Policy Analysts Ltd. Role: Address: Farthing Green House, 1 Beccles Rd, Loddon, Norfolk, NR14 6LT Telephone number: 01508 528465 Mobile telephone number: E-mail address: [email protected] 2 Local Economic Development and the Environment (LEDE) workbook Contents Contents .................................................................................................................................................. 3 1. One page initial summary ............................................................................................................... 7 1.1. The geographical area of the LEP ............................................................................................ 7 1.2. Description of the economy of the area ................................................................................. 7 1.3. Challenges faced by the economy .......................................................................................... 8 1.4. The plausible future development pathway ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Core Strategy for Broadland, Norwich and South Norfolk – Habitats Regulations Assessment Supplementary Note in Relation
    Joint Core Strategy for Broadland, Norwich and South Norfolk – Habitats Regulations Assessment Supplementary Note in relation to the parts of the Joint Core Strategy for Broadland, Norwich and South Norfolk to be re-published under Regulation 19 of the Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations, 2012 Introduction The Joint Core Strategy for Broadland, Norwich and South Norfolk (JCS) was adopted in March, 2011. However, as a result of a legal challenge following the adoption of the JCS, parts of the strategy were remitted by Order of the High Court. This means that the relevant parts of the JCS (which are specified in a schedule to the Order) are treated as if they have been published as a preliminary to submission to the Secretary of State for examination by an independent inspector, but not progressed beyond that stage. The Order specified certain steps to be taken to enable the re adoption of the JCS, including publication as a preliminary to submission for independent examination. One of the requirements of publication is a Habitats Regulations Assessment. This is because, in accordance with article 6 (3) of the Council Directive 92/43/EEC (as amended) on the Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora (EC Habitats Directive), as transposed into UK law under the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010, a task 1 Appropriate Assessment Test of Likely Significance indicated potential effects on European designated sites within the zone of influence of the policies included in the JCS. Subsequently a task 2 Appropriate Assessment of the JCS was produced in August, 2009, and a further updated Assessment produced in February, 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Fen Management Strategy - Explains the Role of the Strategy and Its Relationship to Other Documents
    CONTENTS Acknowledgements Purpose & use of the fen management strategy - explains the role of the strategy and its relationship to other documents Summary - outlines the need for a fen management strategy Introduction - Sets the picture of development and use of fens from their origins to present day Approach to producing strategy - Methodology to writing the fen management strategy Species requirements: This section provides a summary of our existing knowledge concerning birds, plants, mammals and invertebrates associated with the Broads fens. This information forms a basis for the fen management strategy. Vegetation resource Mammals Birds Invertebrates Summary of special features for each valley: This section mainly identifies the botanical features within each valley. The distribution of birds, mammals and invertebrates is either variable or unknown, and so has been covered only in a general sense in the section on species requirements. However, where there is obvious bird interest concentrated within particular valleys, this has been identified. The botanical section provides a summary analysis of the fen vegetation resource survey and considers the relative importance of fen vegetation in a local and national context. A summary of the chemical variables of the soils for each valley has also been included. Ant valley Bure valley Muckfleet valley Thurne valley Waveney valley Yare valley The fen resource for the future: Identifies aims and objectives to restore fens to favourable nature conservation state Environmental constraints and opportunities - Using the fen management strategy: - During the fen vegetation resource survey, chemical variables of the substratum associated with various plant communities were measured. The purpose of these measurements was to provide some indication of the importance of substrate to the plant communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Action Plan
    BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN April 2018 BROADS IDB – BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN Front cover images (L-R) Marsh Harrier ©Artur Rydzewski; Norfolk Hawker © Milo Bostock; Water Soldier; Water Vole; Berney Marshes ©Mike Page; BIDB Digger BROADS IDB – BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN FOREWORD This Biodiversity Action Plan (Second Edition) has been prepared by the Broads Internal Drainage Board in accordance with the commitment in the Implementation Plan of the DEFRA Internal Drainage Board Review for IDB’s, to produce their own Biodiversity Action Plans by April 2010. As such, the original version was published in January 2010. This revised version aims to continue to align the Broads IDB with biodiversity policy and more specifically, the Biodiversity document for England, “Biodiversity 2020: A strategy for Englands’ Wildlife and Ecosystem Services” and build on the Government’s 25 Year Environmental Plan; A Green Future. In doing so, the document strives to demonstrate the Board’s commitment to fulfilling its duty as a public body under the Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006 to conserve biodiversity. Many of the Board’s activities have benefits and opportunities for biodiversity, not least its water level management and watercourse maintenance work. It is hoped that this Biodiversity Action Plan will help the Board to maximise the biodiversity benefits from its activities and demonstrate its contribution to the targets as part of the Biodiversity 2020 strategy and achieve wider environmental improvement within its catchments. The Board has adopted the Biodiversity Action Plan as one of its policies and subject to available resources is committed to its implementation. It will review the plan periodically and update it as appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • Fen Management Strategy - Explains the Role of the Strategy and Its Relationship to Other Documents
    CONTENTS Acknowledgements Purpose & use of the fen management strategy - explains the role of the strategy and its relationship to other documents Summary - outlines the need for a fen management strategy Introduction - Sets the picture of development and use of fens from their origins to present day Approach to producing strategy - Methodology to writing the fen management strategy Species requirements: This section provides a summary of our existing knowledge concerning birds, plants, mammals and invertebrates associated with the Broads fens. This information forms a basis for the fen management strategy. Vegetation resource Mammals Birds Invertebrates Summary of special features for each valley: This section mainly identifies the botanical features within each valley. The distribution of birds, mammals and invertebrates is either variable or unknown, and so has been covered only in a general sense in the section on species requirements. However, where there is obvious bird interest concentrated within particular valleys, this has been identified. The botanical section provides a summary analysis of the fen vegetation resource survey and considers the relative importance of fen vegetation in a local and national context. A summary of the chemical variables of the soils for each valley has also been included. Ant valley Bure valley Muckfleet valley Thurne valley Waveney valley Yare valley The fen resource for the future: Identifies aims and objectives to restore fens to favourable nature conservation state Environmental constraints and opportunities - Using the fen management strategy: - During the fen vegetation resource survey, chemical variables of the substratum associated with various plant communities were measured. The purpose of these measurements was to provide some indication of the importance of substrate to the plant communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Thurne Broads and Marshes
    Norfolk Team 60 Bracondale NORWICH NR1 2BE Tel: +44 (0)1603 598400 Fax: +44 (0)1603 762552 Email: [email protected] cSAC: The Broads SPA: Broadland Component SSSI: Upper Thurne Broads and Marshes Conservation objectives for the European Interest on the SSSI The conservation objectives for the European interest on the SSSI are: to maintain*, in favourable condition, the: Alluvial forests with Alnus glutinosa and Fraxinus excelsior. Calcareous fens with Cladium mariscus and species of the Carex davallianae. Natural eutrophic lakes with Magnopotamion or Hydrocharition-type vegetation. Transition mires and quaking bogs. Hard oligo-mesotrophic waters with benthic vegetation of Chara spp.. Molinia meadows on calcareous, peaty or clayey-silt-laden soils (Molinion caeruleae). to maintain*, in favourable condition, the habitats for the population of: Otter (Lutra lutra). to maintain*, in favourable condition, the habitats for the populations of Annex1 bird species+ of European importance with particular reference to: open water swamp fen reedbed lowland wet grassland with ditches and water bodies. +Bittern, Marsh harrier, Hen harrier, Bewick’s swan, Whooper swan and Ruff. to maintain*, in favourable condition, the habitats for the populations of migratory bird species+ of European importance with particular reference to: open water swamp fen reedbed lowland wet grassland with ditches and water bodies. +Pink-footed goose, Gadwall and Shoveler. to maintain*, in favourable condition, the habitats of the populations of waterfowl that contribute to the wintering waterfowl assemblage of European importance, with particular reference to: open water swamp and fen lowland wet grassland with ditches and water bodies. * maintenance implies restoration if the feature is not currently in favourable condition.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Flood Risk Assessment
    Greater Norwich Area Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Final Report: Level 1 November 2017 This page has intentionally been left blank 2017s5962 Greater Norwich Area SFRA Final v2.0.docx JBA Project Manager Claire Gardner The Library St Philips Courtyard Church Hill COLESHILL Warwickshire B46 3AD Revision History Revision Ref / Date Issued Amendments Issued to Draft rev 1.0 / June 2017 DRAFT for comment SFRA Steering Group Final Draft rev 2.0 / August 2017 Final DRAFT for comment SFRA Steering Group Final rev 1.0 / October 2017 Final report SFRA Steering Group Final rev 2.0 / November 2017 Final Report – updated with SFRA Steering Group minor text amendments Contract This report describes work commissioned on behalf of a consortium of local planning authorities in Norfolk: • Broadland District Council • Great Yarmouth Borough Council • Borough Council of King’s Lynn and West Norfolk • Norwich City Council • North Norfolk District Council • South Norfolk Council • Broads Authority Each authority was represented as part of a steering group for the SFRA. The steering group’s representative for the contract was North Norfolk’s Policy Team Leader, Iain Withington. Sophie Dusting, Freyja Scarborough and Ffion Wilson of JBA Consulting carried out this work. Prepared by .................................................. Sophie Dusting BSc MEPS Analyst ....................................................................... Ffion Wilson BSc MSc Analyst ....................................................................... Freyja Scarborough BSc MSc Assistant Analyst Reviewed by ................................................. Claire Gardner BSc MSc MCIWEM C.WEM Chartered Senior Analyst ....................................................................... Philip Bennett-Lloyd BSc DipMgmt CMLI MCIEEM MCIWEM C.WEM C.Env Technical Director 2017s5962 Greater Norwich Area SFRA Final v2.0.docx Purpose This document has been prepared as a Final Report for the Greater Norwich Partnership.
    [Show full text]
  • Emergency Response Plan 2006
    Emergency Response Plan 2006 Protection marking: Version: 1 Date: April 2006 Foreword The Breckland Council Emergency Response Plan replaces all previous editions, which should now be destroyed. Under the provisions of the Civil Contingencies Act 2004, the requirement to have in place adequate Emergency Planning and Business Continuity strategies is significantly enhanced. It is important that we all recognise the statutory requirements which have to be in place, adequate emergency response arrangements etc is placed upon the entire Breckland Council staff and not just one department or team. We must have staff adequately trained and prepared to undertake their ‘emergency roles’ and the District Emergency Planning Officer will continue her work to ensure that Breckland Council is ready to meet its commitments under a single or multi agency response to any major or significant emergency which could occur with the County. The Emergency Response Plan will be distributed to appropriate personnel throughout the Authority. Many of the arrangements outlined in the various sections of this plan are generic and the principles will be applied to our response to any major or significant emergency situation, whether it is purely one which affects the internal operations of Breckland Council or the wider community of Norfolk. This document should be read in conjunction with the Breckland Council Business Continuity Plans. All staff should take every opportunity to understand the role of Breckland Council when dealing with major or significant emergencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents and References (Pdf 489Kb)
    The Broads " A breathing space for the cure of souls" Ted Ellis 1 The Broads "A breathing space for the cure of souls" Norwich City Council Broads Authority St Peters Street Yare House Edited by Lesley Marsden Norwich 62-64 Thorpe Road Designed by Norwich City Council NR2 1NH Norwich T 0344 980 3333 NR1 1RY December 2016 www.norwich.gov.uk T (01603) 610734 www.broads-authority.gov.uk 2 The Broads "A breathing space for the cure of souls" The Broads If viewing this document in pdf format please follow the links to supporting documents, partner websites and other information. 3 The Broads "A breathing space for the cure of souls" Contents Introduction 6 Section 1 Section 2 Section 1- Evolution and history 7 Evolution and History Landscape Types Section 2 - Landscape types 45 1.1 Introduction - evolution and history 8 2.1 The Landscape Types of the Broads 45 of the Broads landscape Section 3 - Landscape 81 1.2 How the Broads landscape has 10 1. Tidal estuary 46 character areas been shaped over many thousands 2. Rivers, ronds and floodbanks 48 of years 3. Coastal dunes 51 Section 4 - References, bibliography 228 1.3 The Human Dimension 26 4. Estuarine marshland 54 and acknowledgements 5. Peat “Fen” areas 59 6. Upper river valley “marshlands” 62 7. Broads 64 8. Carr Woodland 67 9. Heathland 69 10. Settled Broads 70 11. Settlement fringe 74 12. Industrial and post industrial 76 – disturbed or made up ground 13. Uplands 78 4 The Broads "A breathing space for the cure of souls" Section 3 Section 4 Landscape Character Areas References, Bibliography & Acknowledgements 3.1 The Landscape Character Areas 81 4.1 References & bibliography 228 of the Broads 4.2 Acknowledgements 231 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The State of England's Chalk Streams
    FUNDED WITH CONTRIBUTIONS FROM REPORT UK 2014 The State of England’s Chalk Streams This report has been written by Rose O’Neill and Kathy Hughes on behalf of WWF-UK with CONTENTS help and assistance from many of the people and organisations hard at work championing England’s chalk streams. In particular the authors would EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 like to thank Charles Rangeley-Wilson, Lawrence Talks, Sarah Smith, Mike Dobson, Colin Fenn, 8 Chris Mainstone, Chris Catling, Mike Acreman, FOREWORD Paul Quinn, David Bradley, Dave Tickner, Belinda by Charles Rangeley-Wilson Fletcher, Dominic Gogol, Conor Linsted, Caroline Juby, Allen Beechey, Haydon Bailey, Liz Lowe, INTRODUCTION 13 Bella Davies, David Cheek, Charlie Bell, Dave Stimpson, Ellie Powers, Mark Gallant, Meyrick THE STATE OF ENGLAND’S CHALK STREAMS 2014 19 Gough, Janina Gray, Ali Morse, Paul Jennings, Ken Caustin, David Le Neve Foster, Shaun Leonard, Ecological health of chalk streams 20 Alex Inman and Fran Southgate. This is a WWF- Protected chalk streams 25 UK report, however, and does not necessarily Aquifer health 26 reflect the views of each of the contributors. Chalk stream species 26 Since 2012, WWF-UK, Coca-Cola Great Britain and Pressures on chalk streams 31 Coca-Cola Enterprises have been working together Conclusions 42 to secure a thriving future for English rivers. The partnership has focused on improving the health A MANIFESTO FOR CHALK STREAMS 45 of two chalk streams directly linked to Coca-Cola operations: the Nar catchment in Norfolk (where AN INDEX OF ENGLISH CHALK STREAMS 55 some of the sugar beet used in Coca-Cola’s drinks is grown) and the Cray in South London, near 60 to Coca-Cola Enterprises’ Sidcup manufacturing GLOSSARY site.
    [Show full text]
  • NORFOLK BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN Ref 1/S12 Tranche 1 Species
    NORFOLK BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN Ref 1/S12 Tranche 1 Species Action Plan 12 WHITE-CLAWED CRAYFISH Plan Author: Environment Agency (Austropotamobius pallipes) Plan Co-ordinator: Environment Agency This is a lobster-like crustacean that grows to Plan Leader: Waterbodies Group about 12cm (5 inches) long. They mainly live in Date: Stage: clean flowing water and are mostly active by 31 December 1998 Final Draft night. February 2002 Final Revised Draft 1. CURRENT STATUS National Status • White-clawed crayfish is the only native species of freshwater crayfish in the UK. It is widespread in clean, calcareous streams, rivers and lakes in England and Wales and occurs in a few areas in Northern Ireland, but many populations have been lost since the 1970s. The species is listed in Appendix III of the Bern Convention and Annexes II and V of the EC Habitats Directive. It is classed as globally threatened by IUCN/WCMC. It is also protected under Schedule 5 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act in respect to taking from the wild and sale, and is proposed for addition to Schedule 5 of the Wildlife (Northern Ireland) Order 1985. Norfolk Status • White-clawed crayfish are found in the Rivers Wensum, Tat, Bure, Glaven and Yare. 2. CURRENT FACTORS CAUSING LOSS OR DECLINE IN NORFOLK • The habitat required by this species is very vulnerable to modifications through the management of rivers and changes in water quality. • White-clawed crayfish are out-competed by non-native crayfish (eg signal crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus) In Norfolk, signal crayfish are known to be present in the River Wensum, Reepham Tributary and River Yare.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Mineral Extraction Sites
    Proposed Mineral Extraction Sites 104 Breckland Sites Map of proposed sites in Beetley (MIN 08, MIN 12, MIN 13, MIN 51) MIN 12 - land north of Chapel Lane, Beetley Site Characteristics • The 16.38 hectare site is within the parish of Beetley • The estimated sand and gravel resource at the site is 1,175,000 tonnes • The proposer of the site has given a potential start date of 2025 and estimated the extraction rate to be 80,000 tonnes per annum. Based on this information the full mineral resource at the site could be extracted within 15 years, therefore approximately 960,000 tonnes could be extracted within the plan period. • The site is proposed by Middleton Aggregates Ltd as an extension to an existing site. • The site is currently in agricultural use and the Agricultural Land Classification scheme classifies the land as being Grade 3. • The site is 3.7km from Dereham and 12km from Fakenham, which are the nearest towns. • A reduced extraction area has been proposed of 14.9 hectares, which creates standoff areas to the south west of the site nearest to the buildings on Chapel Lane, and to the north west of the site nearest the dwellings on Church Lane. Amenity: The nearest residential property is 11m from the site boundary. There are 21 sensitive receptors within 250m of the site boundary. The settlement of Beetley is 260m away and Old Beetley is 380m away. However, land at the north-west and south-west corners is not proposed to be extracted. Therefore the nearest residential property is 96m from the extraction area and there are 18 sensitive receptors within 250m of the proposed extraction area.
    [Show full text]