DOCSLIB.ORG

Cluster – North/West of Boroughbridge

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cluster – North/West of Boroughbridge Appendix A Table to show existing evidence base by parish (including number of residents and businesses and current registered demand levels) Key: ----------- Private sector solutions are known about in these parishes *----------- These parishes can currently access speeds of 2 MBPS or mor (These are only estimates) NB Clusters are listed in order of number of business in the cluster (in descending order) Cluster – North/west of Boroughbridge Name of Parish Reside Busines Total Residents in Cluster Total Businesses in Cluster Number of residents nts ses (figure in brackets is total (figure in brackets is total registered on NYCC excluding those in parishes excluding those in parishes Demand tool that have 2 MBP /known that have 2 MBP / known Total= (those 2mb or proposed schemes) proposed schemes) under) Newby 11 12 Skelton 140 5 1 (500kb) Westwick 4 0 Roecliffe 106 46 Milby 67 17 Ellenthorpe 12 1 Humberton 17 0 Kirby Hill 176 4 Thornton Bridge 12 2 Norton Le Clay 179 5 Cundall 39 2 Givendale 8 0 Lanthorpe 353 12 Dishforth 286 11 2 (400kb-1mb) Marton le Moor 84 1 1 (1mb) Rainton with Newby 156 4 Hutton Conyers 107 34 Assenby 132 3 2 (4-5mb) Copt Hewick 97 19 1 Bridge Hewick 19 5 Total 2005 (1873) - (1,347) 183 (180) - (164) Total = (6) RECOMMENDATION FOR NORTH/WEST OF BOROUGHBRIDGE CLUSTER: Do not prioritise for PRG funding at this stage because at least three of the parishes have an identified private sector solution, with potential for more. HBC to engage with private sector partner to try and establish full cluster scheme if possible. 2 Cluster – South/East of District Name of Parish Reside Busines Total Residents in Total Businesses in Number of residents registered on nts ses Cluster (figure in Cluster (figure in NYCC Demand tool brackets is total brackets is total Total= (those 2mb or under) excluding those in excluding those in parishes that have 2 parishes that have 2 MBP /known proposed MBP / known proposed schemes) schemes) Tockwith 665 82 Appears from consultation with businesses that 1 (2mb Cattal) majority are receiving 8 MB 2 (800kb-3mb) Bilton in Ainsty 171 12 Long Marston 252 14 Mixture of responses from two agents, one noting 1 (1mb Angram) not aware of any broadband problems, other noted all tenants benefit from broadband and whilst they would like to see improvements to speeds, it is not stopping business. Wilstopp 4 0 Kirkhammerton 204 18 Business confirmed receiving great speeds due to exchange upgrade. Thornville 3 0 *Cattal 51 4 1 (2mb) Hunsingore 60 5 Total 1410 (1359) 135 (131) without Total (4) Tockwith and Kirkhammerton (31) RECOMMENDATION FOR SOUTH/EAST OF DISTRICT CLUSTER: Do not prioritise for PRG funding at this stage. Evidence of business park speeds (8MB +) means that cluster cannot be prioritised on business numbers if Tockwith parish is taken out of calculation. Look at developing evidence base further in next stage of prioritisation work. 3 Cluster – South of Ripon Name of Parish Reside Busines Total Residents in Total Businesses in Number of residents registered on nts ses Cluster (figure in Cluster (figure in NYCC Demand tool brackets is total brackets is total Total= (those 2mb or under) excluding those in excluding those in parishes that have 2 parishes that have 2 MBP /known proposed MBP / known proposed schemes) schemes) Markington 266 11 2 (400kb-1mb Markington) 1 (3mb Wormald Green) Bishop Thornton 202 24 1 (400kb Shaw Mills) Ripley 94 0 Nidd 55 6 1 (50kb) Warsill 11 4 Burton Leonard 300 8 16 (1-4mb – 14 are 2mb or under) South Stainley 62 7 6 (4-600kb) Bishop Monkton 367 15 16 (2-6mb -11 are 2mb or under) Littlethorpe 284 0 4 (2-5mb) Markingfield Hall 4 0 Scotton 277 33 Scriven 98 3 1 (1mb) Ferrensby 30 3 1 (1mb) Farnham 82 5 2 (50kb-1mb) Walkingham 8 0 Brearton 60 2 *Copgrove 55 6 Total 2255 (2102) 124 (115) Total (39) RECOMMENDATION FOR SOUTH OF RIPON CLUSTER: Identify as Priority 1 for PRG funding, based on business numbers who could benefit from improvements (although high demand also evident aswell) 4 Cluster – South East of Harrogate Name of Parish Reside Busines Total Residents in Total Businesses in Number of residents registered on nts ses Cluster (figure in Cluster (figure in NYCC Demand tool brackets is total brackets is total Total= (those 2mb or under) excluding those in excluding those in parishes that have 2 parishes that have 2 MBP /known proposed MBP / known proposed schemes) schemes) Kirk Deighton 221 17 Plompton 46 2 4 (5-kb-2mb Calcutt) Little Ribston 37 0 North Deighton 32 0 Gt Ribston 35 4 Allerton 65 10 1 (3mb Hopperton) Flaxby 41 2 Goldsborough 218 8 1 (1mb) Kirby Overblow 198 4 16 (2mb or under) Kearby with Netherby 93 2 Sicklinghall 127 11 *Spofforth 516 29 Follifoot 244 26 124 (121 2mb or under) Total 1873 (1357) 115 (86) Total (142) RECOMMENDATION FOR SOUTH EAST OF HARROGATE CLUSTER: Identify as Priority 2 for PRG funding, based on business numbers who could benefit from improvements (although high demand also evident as well) 5 Cluster – South west of Harrogate Pannal 168 27 1 (500kb Beckwith) Nesfield w Langbar 69 0 1 (1mb Langbar) Denton 48 1 Stainburn 56 1 Askwith 101 4 Weston 80 0 Newall 80 2 Farnley 147 12 Leathley 85 4 Castley 37 14 *Weeton 394 5 North Rigton 197 11 Haverah Park 14 2 Beckwith Norwood 91 5 1 (1mb) Middleton 42 1 Lindley 25 0 1 (2mb) Total 1634 (1240) 89 (84) Total (4) RECOMMENDATION FOR SOUTH WEST OF HARROGATE CLUSTER: Do not identify as a next priority for PRG funding at this stage. Look to develop evidence base further. Cluster - South of Pateley Bridge Hartwith 469 34 5 (2-8mb Summerbridge) Bewerley 337 17 Dacre 329 9 Total 1135 60 Total (1) RECOMMENDATION FOR SOUTH OF PATELEY BRIDGE CLUSTER: 6 Do not identify as a next priority for PRG funding at this stage. Look to develop evidence base further. Cluster – North West of District *Masham 642 47 Burton on Yore 40 1 Grewelthorpe 205 14 Swinton 38 5 Ilton 24 1 2 (50—100kb) Healey 52 2 Colsterdale 2 1 Fearby 59 3 Ellingstring 38 0 3 (400kb-1mb) Ellington 29 0 4 (300-700kb) Total 1129 (487) 74 (27) Total (9) RECOMMENDATION FOR NORTH WEST OF DISTRICT CLUSTER: Do not identify as a next priority for PRG funding at this stage. Look to develop evidence base further. Cluster – West of Ripon *Kirby Malzeard 395 23 Laverton 125 4 Azerly 156 6 2 (2-5mb Galphay) *North Stainley 285 21 1 (1mb Sutton Grange) Studley Roger 56 1 Lindrick with Studley 25 3 1 (4mb Fountains bridge)) Adfield 29 0 2 (300-500kb) *Sawley 129 5 Grantley 60 5 Eavestone 10 0 Skelding 8 0 Winksley 84 3 Total 1362 (553) 71 (22) Total (4) 7 RECOMMENDATION FOR WEST OF RIPON CLUSTER: Do not identify as a next priority for PRG funding at this stage. Look to develop evidence base further. Cluster – North of Pateley Bridge *High and Low 1060 87 2 (2-8mb glasshouses) Bishopdale 2 (7mb Pateley) Stonebeck Up 59 3 2 (100kb-4mb Middlesmoor) Fountains Earth 102 5 1 (900kb Bouthwaite) Stonebeck Down 38 3 1 (600kb Heathfield) 1 (300kb Blayshaw) 1 (800kb Ramsgill) 1 (900kb Stean) Total 1259 (199) 98 (11) Total (7) RECOMMENDATION FOR NORTH OF PATELEY BRIDGE CLUSTER: Do not identify as a next priority for PRG funding at this stage. Look to develop evidence base further. 8.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Der Europäischen Gemeinschaften Nr
    26 . 3 . 84 Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften Nr . L 82 / 67 RICHTLINIE DES RATES vom 28 . Februar 1984 betreffend das Gemeinschaftsverzeichnis der benachteiligten landwirtschaftlichen Gebiete im Sinne der Richtlinie 75 /268 / EWG ( Vereinigtes Königreich ) ( 84 / 169 / EWG ) DER RAT DER EUROPAISCHEN GEMEINSCHAFTEN — Folgende Indexzahlen über schwach ertragsfähige Böden gemäß Artikel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe a ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG wurden bei der Bestimmung gestützt auf den Vertrag zur Gründung der Euro­ jeder der betreffenden Zonen zugrunde gelegt : über päischen Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft , 70 % liegender Anteil des Grünlandes an der landwirt­ schaftlichen Nutzfläche , Besatzdichte unter 1 Groß­ vieheinheit ( GVE ) je Hektar Futterfläche und nicht über gestützt auf die Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG des Rates vom 65 % des nationalen Durchschnitts liegende Pachten . 28 . April 1975 über die Landwirtschaft in Berggebieten und in bestimmten benachteiligten Gebieten ( J ), zuletzt geändert durch die Richtlinie 82 / 786 / EWG ( 2 ), insbe­ Die deutlich hinter dem Durchschnitt zurückbleibenden sondere auf Artikel 2 Absatz 2 , Wirtschaftsergebnisse der Betriebe im Sinne von Arti­ kel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe b ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG wurden durch die Tatsache belegt , daß das auf Vorschlag der Kommission , Arbeitseinkommen 80 % des nationalen Durchschnitts nicht übersteigt . nach Stellungnahme des Europäischen Parlaments ( 3 ), Zur Feststellung der in Artikel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe c ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG genannten geringen Bevöl­ in Erwägung nachstehender Gründe : kerungsdichte wurde die Tatsache zugrunde gelegt, daß die Bevölkerungsdichte unter Ausschluß der Bevölke­ In der Richtlinie 75 / 276 / EWG ( 4 ) werden die Gebiete rung von Städten und Industriegebieten nicht über 55 Einwohner je qkm liegt ; die entsprechenden Durch­ des Vereinigten Königreichs bezeichnet , die in dem schnittszahlen für das Vereinigte Königreich und die Gemeinschaftsverzeichnis der benachteiligten Gebiete Gemeinschaft liegen bei 229 beziehungsweise 163 .
    [Show full text]
  • Title Page and Contents Pages
    FROM EDENVAL E TO THE PLAINS OF YORK: OR , A THOUSAND MILES IN THE VALLEYS OF THE NIDD AND YORE . OLD YORK From a Sketch taken 5o years ago . BY EDMUND BOGG, Author of " Nidderdale and the Vale of the Nidd," " A Thousand Niles in Wharfedale," &'c. Member of the Yorkshire Archaeological Society, & c. BEAUTIFULLY ILLUSTRATED WITH UPWARDS OF 200 SPECIALLY DESIGNED PICTURES, By Gilbert Foster, Percy Robinson, Albert Haselgrave, Frank Dean, Owen Bowen, Edmund Fogg, and others . LEEDS : EDMUND BOGG, 3, WOODHOUSE LANE. YORK : JOHN SAMPSON, CONEY STREET . CONTENTS . CHAPTER I. PAGE. CHAPTER IV.— Continued. PAGE. A brief description of the interesting places in Richard Harrison ; TOCKWITH Village ; Mt . the vales of the Yore and the Nidd . .. 1 to6 TON and SINNINGTHWAITE ; Bilton Church, &c . ; Its ancient features ; Skewkirk Ferry; CHAPTER II. KIRK HAMMERTON ; The old Saxon Church; GREEN HAMMErTON ; A Village Feast; A Retrospective Sketch ; The Brigantes; Original Characters ; The Upland Country 42 to 5 2 Druidism ; Queen Cartismandau ; Carac- tacus, 'a prisoner, is taken to Rome ; Th e CHAPTER V. subjection of the Brigantes by Rome ; The invasion of the Saxons and the dispersion The OUSEBUrN Villages : A vivid description of the old Celtic race ; Gregory the Great of bygone times .. 53 to 64 and the tale of the Slave Market ; The conversion of Saxons by the Romish Church; CHAPTER VI. Edwin, Prince of Deira ; The destruction of the Heathen Gods, Woden and Thor, and th e WHIXLEY ; Christopher Tancred, his curious Baptism of the Angles by Paulinus in the will, &c . ; The Church ; ALLErTON ; The Swale and the Yore ; The Battle of Heath- Mauleverers ; The Hall ; The Church and field and death of Edwin ; Winwoed Field Tombs of the Mauleverers ; The Vale and the death of Penda ; Noble and shining of Yolk, &c .
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government for England Report No
    Local Government For England Report No. 312 LOCAL BOUNDARY COAliMISSICN FOR ENGLAND REPORT .NO. 3/2. LOCAL UOyhiUUiiiflT UOUULA.rt COKuAISLilOM FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN Sir Edmund Compton GCB KBii DEPUTY CHAIRMAN Mr J M Rankin QC MEIVIBERS Lady Bov/den MrJ T Brockbank: Professor Michael Chisholm Mr R R Thornton CB I)L Mr D P Harrison To the Rt Hon Merlyn Rees, MP Secretary of State for the Home Department PROPOSALS FOR FUTURE ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE BOROITGH OF HARROGATE IN THE COUNTY OF NORTH YORKSHIRE 1. We, the Local Government Boundary Commission for England, having carried out our initial review of the electoral arrangements for the Borough of Harrogate in accordance with the requirements of section 63 of, and Schedule 9 to, the Local Government Act 1972» present our proposals for the future electoral arrangements for that borough* 2. In accordance with the procedure laid down in section 60(l) and (2) of the 1972 Act, notice was given on 6 May 1975 that we were to undertake this review. This was incorporated in a consultation letter addressed to Harrogate Borough Council, copies of which were circulated to North Yorkshire County Council, parish councils and parish meetings in the borough, the Members of Parliament for the constituencies concerned and the headquarters of the main political parties. Copies were also sent to the editors of local newspapers circulating in the area and of the local government press. Notices inserted in the local press announced the start of the review and invited comments from members of the public and from interested bodies* 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Directory of Establishments 2020/21- Index
    CHILDREN AND YOUNG PEOPLE’S SERVICE DIRECTORY OF ESTABLISHMENTS 2020/21- INDEX Page No Primary Schools 2-35 Nursery School 36 Secondary Schools 37-41 Special Schools 42 Pupil Referral Service 43 Outdoor Education Centres 43 Adult Learning Service 44 Produced by: Children and Young People’s Service, County Hall, Northallerton, North Yorkshire, DL7 8AE Contact for Amendments or additional copies: – Marion Sadler tel: 01609 532234 e-mail: [email protected] For up to date information please visit the Gov.UK Get information about Schools page at https://get-information-schools.service.gov.uk/ 1 PRIMARY SCHOOLS Telephone Status County Council Ward School name and address Headteacher DfE No Email NC= nursery District Council area class Admiral Long Church of England Primary Mrs Elizabeth T: 01423 770185 3228 VC Lower Nidderdale & Bishop School, Burnt Yates, Harrogate, North Bedford E:admin@bishopthorntoncofe. Monkton Yorkshire, HG3 3EJ n-yorks.sch.uk Previously Bishop Thornton C of E Primary Harrogate Collaboration with Birstwith CE Primary School Ainderby Steeple Church of England Primary Mrs Fiona Sharp T: 01609 773519 3000 Academy Swale School, Station Lane, Morton On Swale, E: admin@ainderbysteeple. Northallerton, North Yorkshire, n-yorks.sch.uk Hambleton DL7 9QR Airy Hill Primary School, Waterstead Lane, Mrs Catherine T: 01947 602688 2190 Academy Whitby/Streonshalh Whitby, North Yorkshire, YO21 1PZ Mattewman E: [email protected] Scarborough NC Aiskew, Leeming Bar Church of England Mrs Bethany T: 01677 422403 3001 VC Swale Primary School, 2 Leeming Lane, Leeming Bar, Stanley E: admin@aiskewleemingbar. Northallerton, North Yorkshire, DL7 9AU n-yorks.sch.uk Hambleton Alanbrooke Community Primary School, Mrs Pippa Todd T: 01845 577474 2150 CS Sowerby Alanbrooke Barracks, Topcliffe, Thirsk, North E: admin@alanbrooke.
    [Show full text]
  • Polling District and Wards
    REGINDEX HARROGATE BOROUGH COUNCIL REGISTERS INDEX 2018 Key Code at the end of the Polling District gives Constituency. H = Harrogate and Knaresborough S = Skipton and Ripon A = Selby and Ainsty Document control – 19 Feb 2018 DIVISION WARD POLLING DISTRICT CODE HARROGATE BILTON 1.HARROGATE BILTON HARROGATE BILTON GRANGE AAH & NIDD GORGE GRANGE HARROGATE BILTON 2.HARROGATE BILTON HARROGATE BILTON BAH & NIDD GORGE WOODFIELD WOODFIELD HARROGATE 3.HARROGATE HARROGATE CENTRAL CAH CENTRAL CENTRAL HARROGATE 4 HARROGATE HARROGATE COPPICE VALLEY 1 DAH1 CENTRAL COPPICE VALLEY HARROGATE BILTON HARROGATE COPPICE VALLEY 2 DAH2 & NIDD GORGE HARROGATE 5. HARROGATE DUCHY HARROGATE DUCHY EAH1 SALTERGATEL HARROGATE DUCHY EAH2 (Killinghall Oakdale) HARROGATE 6.HARROGATE FAIFAX HARROGATE FAIRFAX FAH1 CENTRAL HARROGATE HARROGATE FAIRFAX FAH2 STARBECK HARROGATE HARLOW 7. HARROGATE HARROGATE HARLOW GAH HARLOW HARROGATE 8.HARROGATE HIGH HARROGATE HIGH HARROGATE HAH CENTRAL HARROGATE HARROGATE 9. HARROGATE HARROGATE HOOKSTONE IAH1 STARBECK HOOKSTONE HARROGATE HARROGATE HOOKSTONE IAH2 OATLANDS HARROGATE 10. HARROGATE HARROGATE KINGSLEY JAH1 CENTRAL KINGSLEY HARROGATE HARROGATE KINGSLEY JAH2 STARBECK HARROGATE BILTON 11. HARROGATE NEW HARROGATE NEW PARK PT 1 KAH & NIDD GORGE PARK HARROGATE BILTON HARROGATE NEW PARK PT 2 KBH1 & NIDD GORGE HARROGATE KBH2 SALTERGATE HARROGATE 12. HARROGATE HARROGATE OATLANDS LAH1 OATLANDS OATLANDS PANNAL & LOWER LAH2 WHAREFDALE HARROGATE BILTON 13. HARROGATE OLD HARROGATE OLD BILTON MAH & NIDD GORGE BILTON PANNAL & LOWER 14. HARROGATE HARROGATE PANNAL PT 1 NAH WHAREFDALE PANNAL (Pannal & Burn Bridge) HARROGATE HARLOW HARROGATE PANNAL PT 2 NBH HARROGATE 15. HARROGATE HARROGATE SALTERGATE OAH1 SALTERGATE SALTERGATE HARROGATE SALTERGATE OAH2 (Killinghall Saltergate) HARROGATE HARLOW 16. HARROGATE ST HARROGATE ST GEORGE PAH1 HARROGATE GEORGE PAH2 OATLANDS HARROGATE 17.
    [Show full text]
  • RAMSGILL Conservation Area Character Appraisal
    RAMSGILL Conservation Area Character Appraisal Approved 4 February 2009 Ramsgill Conservation Area Character Appraisal - Approved 4 February 2009 p. 29 Contents Page 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 Objectives .................................................................................................................. 2 2. Planning policy context .................................................................................................. 2 3. Historic development & archaeology ............................................................................. 3 4. Location & setting .......................................................................................................... 4 5. Landscape analysis ....................................................................................................... 5 6. Village analysis ............................................................................................................11 7. Form & character of buildings ..................................................................................... 14 Map 1: Historic development ........................................................................................... 18 Map 2: Conservation Area boundary (with suggested extensions) ................................. 19 Map 3: Analysis,concepts & landscape ............................................................................ 20 Appendix A: 1. Management strategy
    [Show full text]
  • Wath Mill Upper Nidderdale Landscape Partnership
    Wath Mill Upper Nidderdale Landscape Partnership 1 Published by Nidderdale Area of All rights reserved. Outstanding Natural Beauty, 2018 No part of this publication may be reproduced, Nidderdale AONB, The Old Workhouse, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form, King Street, Pateley Bridge, Harrogate HG3 5LE or by any means, electrical, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without permission of the ISBN 978-1-78926-564-4 copyright holders. © Nidderdale Area of Outstanding Natural Front cover: Wath Mill after restoration. © Rob Light Below: Wath in 1910. Beauty and Nidderdale Chase Heritage Group © Nidderdale Museum 2 The story of Wath Mill The quiet village of Wath in Upper Nidderdale Wath takes its name from the Old Norse word for a ford, vað. has an unexpected side to its past. For more In its earliest written appearances it was Acchewath – the ford than four hundred years this sleepy place belonging to a Danish settler called Aki. For centuries the was a vibrant scene of industry. village was an important crossing place on the River Nidd. In a secluded spot behind the village pub is a handsome but unassuming stone building with a steep slate roof. It is embellished with a cupola, a small decorative dome, on the ridge and a gable-end bellcote. Attached to it is a cart shed and stables, and a row of cottages. Above the main entrance in the gable facing the lane is a cast-iron girder with an inscription which gives a clue to this building’s former use. It says, ‘Mill rebuilt 1880’.
    [Show full text]
  • Rural Rate Relief 2018
    RURAL RATE RELIEF RURAL SETTLEMENTS The settlements which are to be included in an authority’s rural settlement list are those which are: 1) wholly or partly within an authority’s area; 2) appear to the billing authority to have had a population of 3,000 or less on the preceding 31st December; and 3) are wholly or partly within a designated rural area A rural area has been designated as being an area which is contained in the schedule to section 17 (the right to acquire) of the Housing Act 1996 and section 1AA(3)(a)(additional right to franchise)of the Leasehold Reform Act 1967. This document contains the list of rural settlements for the area of Harrogate Borough Council. Where the rural settlement is a parished area the population is obtained from the North Yorkshire County Council Population Estimates 2016. Where the rural settlement is part of a parished area the population is an estimate based on the number of residential properties in the designated area allowing for an occupation rate of 2.35 persons per property, the 2011 Census average household size for Harrogate District. Plans of the settlements are enclosed. RURAL SETTLEMENT PARISH STATUS POPULATION ESTIMATE Aismunderby Littlethorpe Unparished 26 Aldborough Boroughbridge Unparished 397 Aldfield Aldfield Parished 100 Allerton Mauleverer Allerton Mauleverer w Hopperton Unparished 115 Angram Long Marston Unparished 52 Arkendale Arkendale Parished 280 Asenby Asenby Parished 280 Askwith Askwith Parished 230 Azerley Azerley Unparished 54 Baldersby Baldersby Unparished 261 Baldersby
    [Show full text]
  • Harrogate Bridleways Association Operating Area
    HARROGATE BRIDLEWAYS ASSOCIATION OPERATING AREA North Yorkshire County Council City of York Council Leeds City Council North York Moors National Park Yorkshire Dales National Park North Yorkshire County Council parishes taken from a map supplied in 2006 and cross referenced with a map created by HBA in 1991 of the new operating area following the formation of the new group after the BHS run HABA was disbanded. NYCC – Southern Area Harrogate North Rigton Pannal Haverah Park Stainburn Leathley Weeton Kirkby Overblow Castley Kearby with Netherby Spofforth with Stockeld Sicklinghall Allerton Mauleverer with Hopperton Hampsthwaite Clint Killinghall Follifoot Little Ribston North Deighton Kirk Deighton Hunsingore Tockwith Great Ribston with Walshford Bilton in Ainsty with Bickerton Long Marston Wilstrop Nun Monkton Thorpe Underwood Green Hammerton Kirk Hammerton Whixley Cattal Goldsborough Moor Monkton 2/ Knaresborough Plompton Thornville Kirby Hill Little Ouseburn Great Ouseburn Kirby Hall Dunsforths Marton cum Grafton Flaxby Coneythorpe with Clareton Arkendale Ferrensby Farnham Scotton Nidd Brearton Walkingham Hill with Occaney Ripley South Stainley with Cayton Copgrove Burton Leonard Littlethorpe Bishop Monkton Markenfield Hall Givendale Newby with Mulwith Roecliffe Staveley Boroughbridge Langthorpe Milby Humberton Thornton Bridge Skelton Westwick Lindrick with Studley Royal and Fountains Kirklington cum Upsland Bridge Hewick Marton le Moor Norton le Clay Cundall with Leckby Sharow Copt Hewick Asenby Dishforth Rainton with Newby 3/…. Hutton
    [Show full text]
  • WATH (Nidderdale) Conservation Area Character Appraisal
    WATH (Nidderdale) Conservation Area Character Appraisal Wath (Nidderdale) Conservation Area Character Appraisal -approved approved 30 November 30 November 2011 2011p. a Contents Page 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 Objectives ........................................................................................................................ 2 2. Planning policy framework ............................................................................................ 2 3 Historic development and archaeology ......................................................................... 3 4 Location and landscape setting ..................................................................................... 5 5. Landscape character .................................................................................................... 6 6. Village analysis .............................................................................................................. 9 7. The form and character of buildings ............................................................................11 Map 1: Historic development ........................................................................................... 15 Map 2: Conservation Area boundary .............................................................................. 16 Map 3: Landscape, analysis and concepts ...................................................................... 17 Appendix A: 1 Management
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 of 1 Local Boundary Commission for England
    Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 Harrogate District Personal Details: Name: Sarah Adamson E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Pateley Bridge Town Council Comment text: Based upon the topography of the area with the main bulk of the population, transport and traditions following the River Nidd Valley, and aware of the need to reduce the number of wards of the District Council whilst improving the representational effectiveness of those wards, Pateley Bridge Town Council would like to suggest that two parishes, Bewerley and Thruscross with Padside, be added to the existing parishes in the Pateley Bridge Ward – (Stonebeck Up, Stonebeck Down, Fountains Earth and High and Low Bishopside). Although this would be a large geographical area it would provide the number of residents to satisfy the Boundary Commissions suggestions for the District. Most importantly High and Low Bishopside and Bewerley together form the town of Pateley Bridge which is the service town for the Upper Dale; these two parishes, either side of the river Nidd, form one community, with many shared interests spread across the two parishes: schools, Cemetery, Memorial Hall, Show Ground, jointly owned Recreation Ground, Post Office, Business Association and shops. The link to Padside is one of close neighbours with their school being a major feeder school for the High School in Pateley Bridge. The links to the three parishes (Stonebeck Up, Stonebeck Down, Fountains Earth) north of Pateley Bridge are already well established within the current Ward and should remain within it. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/7902 14/04/2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for Harrogate in North Yorkshire
    LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE FUTURE ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR HARROGATE IN NORTH YORKSHIRE Report to the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions November 1999 LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND This report sets out the Commission’s final recommendations on the electoral arrangements for the borough of Harrogate in North Yorkshire. Members of the Commission are: Professor Malcolm Grant (Chairman) Professor Michael Clarke (Deputy Chairman) Peter Brokenshire Kru Desai Pamela Gordon Robin Gray Robert Hughes CBE Barbara Stephens (Chief Executive) ©Crown Copyright 1999 Applications for reproduction should be made to: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Copyright Unit. The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by The Local Government Commission for England with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, ©Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G. This report is printed on recycled paper. ii LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CONTENTS page LETTER TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE v SUMMARY vii 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 CURRENT ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS 3 3 DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS 9 4 RESPONSES TO CONSULTATION 11 5 FURTHER CONSULTATION 13 6 ANALYSIS AND FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS 15 7 NEXT STEPS 37 APPENDICES A Final Recommendations for Harrogate: Detailed Mapping 39 B Draft Recommendations for Harrogate (May 1999) 43 A large map illustrating the proposed ward boundaries for the towns of Harrogate, Knaresborough and Ripon is inserted inside the back cover of the report. LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND iii iv LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND Local Government Commission for England 30 November 1999 Dear Secretary of State On 3 November 1998 the Commission began a periodic electoral review of Harrogate under the Local Government Act 1992.
    [Show full text]