Fosbr Friends of Sandy Bay Rivulet

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fosbr Friends of Sandy Bay Rivulet FoSBR Friends of Sandy Bay Rivulet Inc. Newsletter 10 — Nov/Dec 2008 OFFICE BEARERS: Next Meeting : Rivulet Visit — Now & Then President James Bowler Secretary Julia Greenhill A joint meeting in conjunction with the Sandy Bay Historical Society on Treasurer Beth Harnett Sunday 23rd November 2008. The meeting will commence at 12.30 with Committee Patsy Jones a sausage sizzle. Venue is Waterworks Reserve Site 1. As usual bring Deb Maeder your own food, drinks, etc. Photos of various aspects of the rivulet will Penny Parrish be on display. Public Officer Julia Greenhill Commencing about 1.30pm, after the sausage sizzle, we will visit various sites along the rivulet. Jim Bowler & Penny Parrish will lead the discussion and commentary but other input will be welcomed. It is Fauna Watch - intended to cover some of the fascinating history and natural history of “Scats, Tracks and a the rivulet. In case the Tasmanian weather is its normal variable self we Bird or Ten” aim to travel between key points along the rivulet by car. On Sunday 12th October at the Waterworks a select group met Editorial to learn something about fauna watch. Leading the group’s en- The Executive lodged a representa- the members of the City Council clearly deavors were Dr Obendorf, Don tion with the HCC concerning the demonstrated its lack of understanding of Knowler and Sonya Stallbaum proposed development at 9 –11 Lin- the scientific issues involved. (HCC) coln St. The work proposed included the demolition of an old two flat One has to ask why we have these provi- The meeting was aimed at en- building and the construction of two sions if they are not to be applied? The couraging a wider knowledge of new flats and a vehicle turning circle. answer can only be a lack of appreciation the fauna of our area, and in- of the factors involved. There is obvi- cluded some bird identification. Our action was taken with reluctance ously a need to improve the understand- as some aspects of the proposal were ing of the professionals involved in the It is hoped that in the long term laudable and we also prefer to foster analysis and the Aldermen who make the we will have a better and more a good working relationship with final decisions. substantive record of fauna in landowners. Our concern was the impact of the development on the the rivulet riparian zone and sur- As a result we intend, in the future, fea- rounds. riparian zone and the rivulet. turing specialist articles on the rivulet Riparian zones are not necessary just and about the current status of water This will help both in the protec- for recreational purposes, but to es- sensitive urban design and riparian zone tion of our native species and in tablish and maintain the rivulet as a practice. Hopefully this, coupled with a our capacity to make better deci- aquatic and terrestrial habitat , as a wider distribution, will help get the mes- sions on land use. wildlife corridor and as a means of sage across so the decision makers can controlling the volume and quality of start making informed and reasoned deci- Thanks to all who participated surface and sub surface run off. The sions. zone is also important in reducing We acknowledge and thank the bank erosion and stream sedimenta- following organisations for their tion. The issue is extremely complex. support: The 10m width in the Planning SHIPPIES Scheme was adopted by the HCC on Shipwrights Arms Hotel the basis of minimum national rec- 29 Trumpeter St, Battery Point ommendations. Unfortunately in the Planning Scheme there are discre- HOBART CITY COUNCIL tionary clauses which are often ap- Town Hall, Hobart plied without understanding the real issues involved in modern water sen- We also acknowledge the assistance sitive urban design nor the role or provided by the Office of Senator function of riparian zones. Sadly in Eric Abetz in the production of this assessing the proposal a majority of Newsletter COMMENTS ON THE SANDY two species in very low abundance, in protect, maintain and perhaps restore neighbouring streams to the south. The only aspects of its urban streams, both in BAY RIVULET streams which approach the aquatic ecologi- amenity and intrinsic ecosystems, then cal state of Sandy Bay Rivulet are Browns implementation of the 10 m setback, By Dr Peter Davies River and New Town Rivulet on the western coupled with requirements for active (A document prepared in relation to the shore of the greater Hobart-Glenorchy- management/improvement (weed con- proposed development at 9—11 Lincoln St) Kingborough area, and the lowest reaches of trol, stabilisation, vegetation planting Risdon Brook on the urban western shore of etc) should be a minimum requirement Background the Derwent estuary. This document is a commentary on the recent The Proposed Development Hobart City Council decision to approve a Along with fish populations, there is an abundant and diverse freshwater inverte- I am particularly concerned that new development application at 9-11 Lincoln developments are allowed to encroach brate fauna in Sandy Bay Rivulet, and ob- Street, Sandy Bay, Hobart. The nature of the within the 10 m setback from streams servations of resident platypus and native comments relates to the need for a 10 m set- required under Clause D.6.1 of the Plan- water rats. back and the aquatic environmental values of ning Scheme. Clause D.6.2 gives dis- the adjacent stream, Sandy Bay Rivulet. cretion to vary the setback where it can While the stream catchment is urbanised in be demonstrated that: I have been a professional aquatic scientist its middle and lower reaches, and it suffers for 28 years, working in Tasmania and from water abstraction, urban runoff and in a) there will be minimum adverse im- throughout Australia. I am a Research Fellow stream structures (that partially impede fish pact upon the environment; movement), the stream has a high level of at the University of Tasmania, member of the b) no compromising of recreational aquatic biodiversity. A chief reason for this Forest Practices Authority Board, and Chair opportunities; of the Murray Darling Basin’s Sustainable is the predominance of vegetation along its Rivers Audit. banks and the absence of significant chronic c) there will be no increased risk of any and/or acute water pollution. hazard such as flooding, erosion or land The stream instability level; and Sandy Bay Rivulet, in my professional I have been monitoring the status of the d) there will be no constraint on access opinion, is a stream which warrants ongoing to a Council or other utility service. aquatic fauna of Sandy Bay Rivulet for over management with the aim of protecting and a decade. This has consisted of periodic sur- sustaining its natural values. It has the op- The proposed development has a 5 veys of fish, aquatic invertebrates, and obser- portunity to be a centrepiece of environ- metre setback which is encroached upon vations of aquatic habitat. I have also been mental rehabilitation and protection in the in part by decks. involved in the installation of structures to Hobart municipality. restore fish passage in three of the main in stream culverts in the Rivulet. This reach of the Sandy Bay Rivulet Stream management between Regent Street and Sandy Bay Sandy Bay Rivulet contains an unusually Clause D.6.1 of the Planning Scheme re- Road contains the majority of the popu- abundant native fish fauna for a suburban quires a setback for any development of 10 lation of both the jollytail and freshwa- stream. This fauna is dominated by four na- metres from the top of the bank of any open ter flathead. For this reason alone, I tive fish species: the Jollytail (Galaxias watercourse. This has the potential to would be concerned if any new develop- maculatus), the mountain galaxias (Galaxias achieve several aims relating to protection ments do not demonstrably protect truttaceus), the freshwater flathead or sandy of assets from flood damage, coupled with and/or improve the habitat values of the (Pseudaphritis urvillii) and the shortfin eel opportunities for protection and improve- stream by: (Anguilla australis). Only one exotic species, ment of riparian (bank side) land and vege- Incorporating a true 10 m setback brown trout (Salmo trutta), has been recorded tation, and hence aquatic biodiversity val- • and is present in several pools. The majority ues. for the entire length of the proposed of the population of both Jollytail and fresh- development along the stream; water flathead is found between Regent Riparian zones provide key roles for stream • Including appropriate plantings, Street and Sandy Bay Road, while the upper ecosystems, including shading, bank stabili- weed control, bank stabilisation in the reaches are dominated by mountain galaxias sation; habitat for platypus, water rats, adult setback within the development pro- and eels. aquatic insects, and birds; control of surface sediment inputs to streams. In addition the posal. vegetation provides a key food resource for The size and diversity of this fish commu- Ensuring no new or ongoing dis- the stream biota – leaf and other litter. This • nity is unique in the greater Hobart municipal ruption or disturbance to the riparian area. Hobart Rivulet contains brown trout but forms the basis of the food chain which also supports fish and platypus. area and/or the area of the stream chan- no resident native fish, and native fish are nel (e.g. through surface runoff, inap- present only occasionally, and as only one or propriate access or structures). If the aim of the Hobart City Council is to Galaxias maculatus (Jollytail) Graham Edgar Galaxias truttaceus (Mountain) Graham Edgar .
Recommended publications
  • Derwent Estuary Program Environmental Management Plan February 2009
    Engineering procedures for Southern Tasmania Engineering procedures foprocedures for Southern Tasmania Engineering procedures for Southern Tasmania Derwent Estuary Program Environmental Management Plan February 2009 Working together, making a difference The Derwent Estuary Program (DEP) is a regional partnership between local governments, the Tasmanian state government, commercial and industrial enterprises, and community-based groups to restore and promote our estuary. The DEP was established in 1999 and has been nationally recognised for excellence in coordinating initiatives to reduce water pollution, conserve habitats and species, monitor river health and promote greater use and enjoyment of the foreshore. Our major sponsors include: Brighton, Clarence, Derwent Valley, Glenorchy, Hobart and Kingborough councils, the Tasmanian State Government, Hobart Water, Tasmanian Ports Corporation, Norske Skog Boyer and Nyrstar Hobart Smelter. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Derwent: Values, Challenges and Management The Derwent estuary lies at the heart of the Hobart metropolitan area and is an asset of great natural beauty and diversity. It is an integral part of Tasmania’s cultural, economic and natural heritage. The estuary is an important and productive ecosystem and was once a major breeding ground for the southern right whale. Areas of wetlands, underwater grasses, tidal flats and rocky reefs support a wide range of species, including black swans, wading birds, penguins, dolphins, platypus and seadragons, as well as the endangered spotted handfish. Nearly 200,000 people – 40% of Tasmania’s population – live around the estuary’s margins. The Derwent is widely used for recreation, boating, fishing and marine transportation, and is internationally known as the finish-line for the Sydney–Hobart Yacht Race.
    [Show full text]
  • Wellington Park Historic Tracks and Huts Network Comparative Analysis
    THE HISTORIC TRACK & HUT NETWORK OF THE HOBART FACE OF MOUNT WELLINGTON Interim Report Comparative Analysis & Significance Assessment Anne McConnell MAY 2012 For the Wellington Park Management Trust, Hobart. Anne D. McConnell Consultant - Cultural Heritage Management, Archaeology & Quaternary Geoscience; GPO Box 234, Hobart, Tasmania, 7001. Background to Report This report presents the comparative analysis and significance assessment findings for the historic track and hut network on the Hobart-face of Mount Wellington as part of the Wellington Park Historic Track & Hut Network Assessment Project. This report is provided as the deliverable for the second milestone for the project. The Wellington Park Historic Track & Hut Network Assessment Project is a project of the Wellington Park Management Trust. The project is funded by a grant from the Tasmanian government Urban Renewal and Heritage Fund (URHF). The project is being undertaken on a consultancy basis by the author, Anne McConnell. The data contained in this assessment will be integrated into the final project report in approximately the same format as presented here. Image above: Holiday Rambles in Tasmania – Ascending Mt Wellington, 1885. [Source – State Library of Victoria] Cover Image: Mount Wellington Map, 1937, VW Hodgman [Source – State Library of Tasmania] i CONTENTS page no 1 BACKGROUND - THE EVOLUTION OF 1 THE TRACK & HUT NETWORK 1.1 The Evolution of the Track Network 1 2.2 The Evolution of the Huts 18 2 A CONTEXT FOR THE TRACK & HUT 29 NETWORK – A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS 2.1
    [Show full text]
  • Constitution Act 1934 (Tas) [Transcript
    [Received from the Clerk of the Legislative Council the 10th day of January 1935 A.G. Brammall Registrar Supreme Court] TASMANIA. _________ THE CONSTITUTION ACT 1934. _________ ANALYSIS. PART I. – PRELIMINARY. Division III. – The Assembly. 1. Short title. 22. Constitution of the Assembly. 2. Repeal. 23. Triennial Parliaments. 3. Interpretation. 24. Election of Speaker. 25. Quorum of the Assembly. PART II. – THE CROWN. Division IV. – Electoral Divisions and 4. Parliament not dissolved by demise Qualifications Of Electors. of the Crown. 5. Demise of the Crown not to affect 26. Council Divisions. things done before proclamation 27. Assembly Divisions. thereof. 28. Qualification of electors for the 6. All appointments, &c., by the Gover- Legislative Council. nor to continue in force notwith- Joint tenants. standing demise of the Crown. 29. Assembly electors. 7. All civil or criminal process, and all contracts, bonds, and engagements Division V. – Disqualification; Vacation with or on behalf of His Majesty Of Office; Penalty. to subsist and continue notwith- standing demise. 30. Oath to be taken by members. 8. Deputy-Governor’s powers. 31. Commonwealth membership. Interpretation. 32. Office of profit. Exercise of powers by Deputy- 33. Contractors. Governor. 34. Vacation of office for other causes. Provision as to deputy of Lieutenant- 35. Penalty for sitting when disqualified. Governor or Administrator. Act to be retrospective. PART IV. – MONEY BILLS; POWERS OF HOUSES PART III. – PARLIAMENT. 36. Interpretation. Division I. – Both Houses. 37. Money bills to originate in the Assembly. 9. Continuation of existing Houses. 38. All money votes to be recommended Continuance in office of existing by the Governor.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report for the 2007-08 Which Will Be Completed by December 2008
    A Year in the South Improving Natural Resource Management in Southern Tasmania NRM South | Annual Report Contents NRM South Annual Report 2007-2008 Letter from the Chair _____________________________________________________________ 1 Our Region: Southern Tasmania ___________________________________________________ 2 Our Region’s Strategy ____________________________________________________________ 3 Our Role: Natural Resource Management South _____________________________________ 4 Highlights: 2007-08 ______________________________________________________________ 5 Strategic Directions: 2008-09 and beyond __________________________________________ 6 Performance Report Performance against the NRM South’s Corporate Plan and Annual Business Plan ________________________________________________________ 7 CASE STUDY Clean, Green Marine: Helping the Fishing Industry Tackle Point-Source Pollution ________ 8 CASE STUDY Reporting with a human face: Piloting the MSC Technique in Tasmania _________________ 9 CASE STUDY Local Government: Banding Together to Preserve Aboriginal Heritage _________________ 11 CASE STUDY Little Swanport: Catchment, River and Community __________________________________ 16 CASE STUDY Here to Share: Managing Tasmania’s Coastal Playground ____________________________ 18 Performance Report Performance against the Natural Resource Management Act 2002 Functions and Powers of Regional Committees ____________________________________ 19 CASE STUDY NRM Incentives: Supporting Landholders in Making a Difference _____________________
    [Show full text]
  • Public Works Proposals
    (No. 71.) 18 91~ PARLIAMENT OF TASMANIA. PU·BLIC WORKS PROPOSALS: .. Memorandum of Public, Works Proposals for the Year 1891, together with Statement of approximate Balances available from former Votes and from Funds derived- under the provisions of the Waste Lands Acts. Presented to both Houses of Parliament by His Excellency's Command. MEMORAJ.YDUM of Public Worhs Pr·oposals f01· the Yem· 1891, together with Statement of approximate Balances available from , j ormer Votes and from Funds derived unde,r the provisions of the Waste Lands Acts. · MAIN ROADS. £ £ 1. Detention to Black River ............................................- ..... .. 1000 2. Detention to Cam ........................................................... 800 3. Launceston to Beaconsfield ................ : .................. : ........ ~ .. 1000 4. Launceston to George Town (near i3th mile-post) ................ .. 400 5. Brearlalbane to Evan dale ................................................ .. 300 6. Scottsdale to Ringarooma .................................................. 500 7. Branxhohn Lane ........................................................... 500 8. Brothers' Horne to Moorina .............................................. .. 250 9. W eldboroil~h to Moorina .................................................. 500 10. George's Bay to Lottah ............................................... .. 1000 11. St. Ma·ry's to Scamander .................................................. 400 12. Campar{ia to Swansea ....................................... : ............
    [Show full text]
  • The Sum of Us
    The Sum of Us The Sum Of Us | 1 4 | The Sum Of Us Jeanneret The Sum Of Us | 5 Janneret Jeannerat Jeannerot Jeannotat, Jeannottat Jeanneney Jeannenez Jeannesson, Jonneret Johannot Johannes Jeanneret- Gris Jeanneret-Grosjean Jeanjean Jeanpierre Jampierre Jeanperrin Jeangirard Jeanjaquet Jeanhenry Jeanclaude Jeanrenaud Jean-Gueninn Jeanguenin Jeanguenat Jean-Richard JeanRichard Jeanrichard Jean-Mairet Jeanmairet Jeanneret Jeanmonod Jeanmonnot Jeangros Jeangroz Jeanningros Grosjean Grandjean Petitjean Jean-Cartier Jean-Quartier Jeanquartier Jeanbourquin Jeanbourgquin Jean- Prêtre Jeanmaire Jeanclerc Jeancier Jeanfavre Jeandrevin Jeanbrun Jeandroz Jeandupeux Jeanloz Jehanneret Jonerey Jennerick Generette Jeneret Genrett Janerette 6 | The Sum Of Us HISTORY OF THE FAMILY JEANNERET ORIGINATING FROM LE LOCLE SWITZERLAND Genealogical search, or more exactly the search of the surname can hardly be made beyond the 15th century. At that time the shortage of personnel, the shortage of documentation and the lack of their text do not make it possible to establish with certainty affiliation. One must be often satisfied with probability and limited data. During the 14th Century, amongst subjects of the Princes of Valangin we find in year 1350, the name of Yermin which becomes Small Jehan then Jehanneret then Jeanneret. In 1447, the population of valley-I-Ruz becoming more numerous, the lord of Valangin supports the colonists who from there in the High Jura will call themselves as clearer- ploughman. At the 14th Century they are established in Segue, with the Between-two-Mounts, Locle the Lime of Bottoms. A family of the name of Jeanneret is installed with the hamlet of Crozot on Locle, an official letter going back to 1612, addressed to Jean-Jacques Jeanneret, Bourgois of Valangin.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vice Newsletter of Tasmanian Fly Tyers' Club Inc
    The Vice Newsletter of Tasmanian Fly Tyers' Club Inc. Volume 9, Issues 1 and 2 Summer Autumn Edition, April 2011 good that this premier fishery will return to some of its former glory next season. President’s Report Terrific fishing from Woods. Good days, but more bad days on the Great Lake, and some good jassid falls at the end of the season. In the north of the state, it was a similar story. Significant rain washed away the hoppers from the river banks and the usually reliable hopper fishing went with On Sunday 27th March some of the members met it. However, Four Springs produced good hatches at patron Barbara Fowler‟s lovely property, and some outstanding fishing days. How I wish Bendeveron, for the annual casting day. What a we had a Four Springs lake in the south of the beautiful autumn day. The Margaret Knight Dry state. Fly Trophy was followed by a delicious lunch and As this season comes to an end I‟m very hopeful then more casting for the Hedley Griggs Wet Fly that next season will be a bumper one. The trophy. highland lakes are looking healthy. Lower down, Whilst the casting is a bit of fun among members Tooms Lake and Meadowbank should be worth a there is no doubt that casting practice will look earlier in the season. Let‟s hope so. improve your fishing. More accurate casts, Finally, I look forward to seeing the new fly greater distance, roll casting, casting into or across patterns, the old fly patterns, and the new fly tyers the wind and so on will catch you more fish.
    [Show full text]
  • Government Departments and Public Bodies…
    2007 (No. 21) 2007 PARLIAMENT OF TASMANIA REPORT OF THE AUDITOR-GENERAL No. 2 of 2007 GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS AND PUBLIC BODIES 2006-2007 Volume Two Government Businesses and Local Government Authorities November 2007 Presented to both Houses of Parliament in accordance with the requirements of Section 57 of the Financial Management and Audit Act 1990 By Authority: Government Printer, Tasmania 1 © Crown in Right of the State of Tasmania November 2007 Auditor-General’s reports are available from the Tasmanian Audit Office, HOBART. This report and other recent reports published by the Office can be accessed via the Office’s home page. For further information please contact: Tasmanian Audit Office GPO Box 851 Hobart TASMANIA 7001 Phone: (03) 6226 0100, Fax (03) 6226 0199 Email:- [email protected] Home Page: http://www.audit.tas.gov.au This report is printed on recycled paper. ISSN 1327 2608 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME TWO Government Businesses ............................................................................. 4 1 Energy Businesses .............................................................................. 7 2 Government Business Enterprises – Introduction and key findings ... 14 Forestry Tasmania .......................................................................................17 Hydro-Electric Corporation ............................................................................28 Motor Accidents Insurance Board ...................................................................38 Port Arthur Historic Site Management
    [Show full text]
  • New Town Rivulet Pedestrian Bridge 2021.1
    Case Study Hobart, Tasmania – The New Town Rivulet is a permanently flowing creek with its headwaters from the springs and snow water run-offs of Mount Wellington. A rewarding walking trail, visitors experience the change in landscape from urban, to suburban to bushland. There is also the Greek-styled Lady New Town Rivulet Franklin Museum, which is now occupied by the Art Society Pedestrian Bridge of Tasmania. The existing pedestrian bridge needed to be replaced. Treadwell was engaged to supply the FRP products for the new bridge. Project Challenges PROJECT INFORMATION • Selected decking had to be anti-slip to ensure user safety. Project Category: Recreational Public Infrastructure • Being installed in the outdoor environment, corrosion resistance and longevity were key concerns. Scope of Work: Supply FRP decking for bridge • Selected decking would have to accommodate concentrated point weight loadings. Treadwell Products: ACCESS SYSTEMS GratEX® FRP Mini Mesh Grating Treadwell Solution: 1 High performance GratEX® FRP grating was specified in building this structure as a preferred solution over traditional materials. Treadwell’s FRP products are constructed from premium resin 2 systems that include corrosion resistant properties and UV inhibitors, as well as fire retardant additives, making it ideal for this outdoor application. 3 The anti-slip surface does not impact the load carrying capacity. 4 FRP is simply fabricated and modified on site. This means there is no need for any hot works permit. 5 Given the nature of FRP, any system utilizing it is virtually maintenance free, keeping maintenance costs to a minimum. CALL 1800 246 800 | [email protected] | treadwellgroup.com.au www.treadwellgroup.com.au OFFICES ABOUT TREADWELL At Treadwell Group, our core business divisions have been develoaped utilising the latest fibreglass reinforced plastic (FRP) technology.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorandum of Proposals for the Year 1890, Together with Satement
    (No. l 08.) 1890. PARLIAMENT OF TASMANIA. PUBLIC WORKS.: Memorandum of Proposals for the Year 1890, together with Statement of Approximate Balances available from former Votes and from Fun4's,, derived under the Provisions of the vVaste Lands Acts. Presented to both Houses of Parliament by His Excellency's Command. ME1JfORANDUM of Public Worhs Proposalsfm· the Year 1890, together with Statement of approximate Balances available frorn former Votes and from Funds derived under the provisions of tlie Waste Lands Acts. MAIN ROADS. £ £ Black River to Sisters' Creek .................................................. 500 Through Ul verstone ............................................................. 500 Torquay to N orthdown ....................................................... : ... 200 Sheffield to Rail ton (including portion near Butts') ....................... 250 Widening Road through Trevallyn ............................................ 150 Launceston to Beaconsfield ............................................... ., .... 850 Scottsdale to Ringarooma ........................................................ 500 Branxholm Lane ................................................................. 200 George's Bay to Lottah ......... >................................................. 500 Swansea to Little Swan port .......................................•.............. 700 Spring Bay to Little Swanport .................................................. 200 Campania to Swansea (Thumbs Hill deviation) ............................ 600 Campania
    [Show full text]
  • A History of the Tasmanian Wine Industry
    A History of the Tasmanian Wine Industry Anthony Walker, B.A., Grad. Dip. Ed. Admin. Submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts University of Tasmania April, 2012 ii Declaration of Originality This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for a degree or diploma by the University or any other institution, except by way of background information and duly acknowledged in the thesis and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, no material previously published or written by another person except where due acknowledgement is made in the test of the thesis, nor does the thesis contain any material that infringes copyright. Signed: ___________________________ Date: ________________ Anthony C Walker iii Authority of Access This thesis may be made available for loan and limited copying and communication in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. Signed: ___________________________ Date: ________________ Anthony C Walker iv Statement of Ethical Conduct The research associated with this thesis abides by the international and Australian codes on human and animal experimentation, the guidelines by the Australian Government’s Office of the Gene Technology Regulator and the rulings of the Safety, Ethics and Institutional Biosafety Committees of the University. 1 ABSTRACT Viticulture and winemaking have become important industries in Tasmania, with a rich narrative dating back to the 1820s, but little work had been done on researching and recording this history. This thesis sets out to fill that gap, dividing the history into three distinct phases. The first, from settlement to 1870 was unsuccessful and it was generally accepted by the end of that phase that Tasmania was “not a wine growing country”.
    [Show full text]
  • 2004-05 Annual Report
    TTHHEE SSOOUUTTHHEERRNN NNAATTUURRAALL RREESSOOUURRCCEE MMAANNAAGGEEMMEENNTT REGIONAL COMMITTEE 22000044--0055 AANNNNUUAALL RREEPPOORRTT SEPTEMBER 2005 NRM South: Annual Report 2004-05 SOUTHERN NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REGIONAL COMMITTEE (NRM SOUTH) 2004-2005 ANNUAL REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS FROM THE CHAIRMAN .......................................................... 4 KEY ACHIEVEMENTS IN 2004-05 .......................................... 6 Progress with implementing the ‘general functions and powers’ of regional committees in 2004-05............................................. 7 Communications and Community Engagement ......................... 13 ADMINISTRATION AND OPERATIONS ................................ 14 The Association ........................................................................ 14 Committee operations .............................................................. 14 Committee membership ........................................................... 15 NRM South Office ..................................................................... 15 Administration and systems management................................ 15 The network of NRM South facilitators ..................................... 16 Funding for operations ............................................................. 17 FUTURE DIRECTIONS ......................................................... 18 Appendix A: BACKGROUND .............................................. 19 The Southern Regional NRM Association Inc and NRM South ... 19 The Southern Region ...............................................................
    [Show full text]