Form 20F (SEC Filing)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
City Office Market Watch
UK Commercial – May 2020 MARKET IN City Office MINUTES Savills Research Market Watch Inevitable drop in take-up for April, although still a significant amount is under offer in the City Despite being in ‘lockdown’ for the entirety of the month, We have started to see a slight uptick in tenant supply, take-up for April reached 165,653 sq ft across 6 deals, rising from a 25% share in March (1.79m sq ft) to a 27% bringing the total for the year to date to 1.5m sq ft, which is share at the end of April (1.95m sq ft), which is still below slightly down on this point last year by 4% and 16% down on the long-term average of 29%. While this is by no means the 10-year average for this part of the year. The 12-month enough tenant supply to begin to affect rents negatively, rolling take-up is now at 6.6m sq ft, which is 3% up on the it is proving our expectations to be correct, and the more 165,553 sq ft 10-year average. Please note that this piece is not intended tenant controlled space we see arrive to the market in the of take-up in April was as an analysis of COVID-19 on the office market, rather a next 6 months could result in a negative effect on rents. the lowest amount of factual analysis of the market metrics. monthly take-up since Some of the notable tenant supply that has come to the February 2009 The largest deal to complete last month saw Covington market since lockdown began in mid-March includes 65,000 & Burling LLP acquire levels 51 - 54 (85,768 sq ft) at sq ft at the Blue Fin, SE1 building from HSBC, 20,300 sq ft TwentyTwo Bishopsgate, EC2. -
The Visitation of London Begun in 1687. by Jacob Field
Third Series Vol. II part 1. ISSN 0010-003X No. 211 Price £12.00 Spring 2006 THE COAT OF ARMS an heraldic journal published twice yearly by The Heraldry Society THE COAT OF ARMS The journal of the Heraldry Society Third series Volume II 2006 Part 1 Number 211 in the original series started in 1952 The Coat of Arms is published twice a year by The Heraldry Society, whose registered office is 53 High Street, Burnham, Slough SL1 7JX. The Society was registered in England in 1956 as registered charity no. 241456. Founding Editor † John Brooke-Little, C.V.O., M.A., F.H.S. Honorary Editors C. E. A. Cheesman, M.A., PH.D., Rouge Dragon Pursuivant M. P. D. O'Donoghue, M.A., Bluemantle Pursuivant Editorial Committee Adrian Ailes, B.A., F.S.A., F.H.S. Andrew Hanham, B.A., PH.D Advertizing Manager John Tunesi of Liongam GENTRY AT THE CENTRE Jacob Field The Visitation of London begun in 1687, edd. T. C. Wales and C. P. Hartley. Harleian Society publications new series, 16-17 (2003-4). 2 vols. London: The Harleian Society, 2005. The 1687 visitation of London was the last held in England and Wales. It has recent• ly been published in two parts by the Harleian Society, edited by Tim Wales and Carol Hartley. London was easily the largest city in the nation, and the centre of pol• itics, culture and economy.1 As such, the 1687 visitation of London holds a dual his• torical importance as both the last visitation in English history, but also an account of the gentry who inhabited England's wealthiest and most important centre of pop• ulation.2 The edition draws on the visitation pedigrees, as well as various other ancil• lary sources, including two notebooks; one from the College of Arms, and one from the Guildhall.3 Henry VIII inaugurated the system of visitations in 1530, making two senior heralds, Clarenceux and Norroy Kings of Arms, responsible for making periodic vis• its to the counties to ensure all arms were borne with proper authority. -
Appendix a Leadenhall Market SPD 1 Conservation Area Document Draft One , Item 7E PDF 4 MB
Leadenhall Market SPD 1. Conservation Area Character Summary and Management Strategy 2. Listed Building Management Guidelines Draft March 2017 1 Leadenhall Market, detail of east entrance 2 Introduction 1. Conservation Area Character Summary and Management Strategy Character Summary 1. Location and context 2. Designation history 3. Summary of character 4. Historical development Early history Medieval Nineteenth century Twentieth century 5. Spatial analysis Layout and plan form Building plots Building heights Views and vistas 6. Character analysis 7. Land uses and related activity 8. Architectural character Architects, styles and influences Building ages 9. Local details Shopfronts and signage Architectural Sculpture Public statuary and other features 10. Building materials 11. Public realm 12. Cultural associations Management Strategy 13. Planning policy 14. Environmental Enhancement 15. Transport 16. Management of open spaces and trees 17. Archaeology 18. Enforcement 19. Condition of the conservation area Further Reading and References 3 Designated heritage assets Contacts 2. Listed Building Management Guidelines 1. Introduction + key partners 2. How Leadenhall Market operates 3. Leadenhall Market – listed grade II* 4. Permissions & Consents for work 5. How to use these guidelines 6. Index of works Appendix 1 Plan of permitted tables and chairs Appendix 2 Shopfront and signage template 4 Introduction The Leadenhall Market SPD comes in two parts. Conservation Area Character Summary and Management Strategy (part 1) The present urban form and character of the City of London has evolved over many centuries and reflects numerous influences and interventions: the character and sense of place is hence unique to that area, contributing at the same time to the wider character of London. -
Pap Post Office London Pap • Paper Makers & Warehouses
1780 PAP POST OFFICE LONDON PAP • PAPER MAKERS & WAREHOUSES. •Davidson 0. & Sons Ltd. Pam•s pier wharf, Loeber Limited, 49 & 50 Milton street EG : Smythe George & Son Ltd. 45 Lndgate hi E C Stt also Agents-Paper; Bank Note Paper 23 Upper Thames street E C wholesale & export paper merchants Spalding & Hodge Ltd. (fine machine ~ Maktrl; Carb01r Paptr Malctrl; Cigm·ettt Davies & Royle, 7 Old Swan lane E C London (The) Paper Mills Co. Ltd. 60 Oannon hand made printing, tub & engine sized Paper Malce·rs Jc /mpl»"tet•s; · Corrugated •Dickinson John & Oo. Ltd. 650ldBaileyEC; street E C writing, plate, drawing & cover papel'l!;,. Paper Malctrs; Lau Paper M a leers; Papl'r 27 Upper Thames street E C; 44 Sumner -f!IMachin & Kingsley, 5 Hare court, Alders excelsior typewriting & cut & pscked note .Jiaktrl (Greauproof); Parchment (Yege street, Southwark SE & 15 & 17 Irongate gate street E C paper), Drury house, Ru.ssell street, Dmry table) Papt1" Manufacturer•; Photographie wharf road, Paddington W Makin John & James Ltd. 79 Queen Victoria la. London WC-T A " Spalding, Rand. Papl!1" Makers Jc Dtaltrs; Stationn-s Dixon L. S. & Co. Ltd. 62 Carter lane E C street EC London " ; Cables " Spslding, London" - Wholtsale Jc ManufactU1-ing, Telegraph Dixon & Roe, 17 W albrook E C Makin J. & Son Ltd. Disley mills, Disley; , T N 5806 Gerrnrd " Paper Makers; 'l'racing Cloth Jc Tracing Dixon Thos. Wm.&Co.259&261 Hackney rd NE white art papers for high class printing; Spicer Brothers Ltd. 19 New Bridge 11treet Paper Makers; JVaiet"P1'00j Paper MllnU• Drayton Paper Works Ltd. -
52-54 Lime Street & 21-26 Leadenhall, 27 & 27A
planning report PDU/3015/02 30 January 2013 52-54 Lime Street & 21-26 Leadenhall, 27 & 27A Leadenhall Street and 34-35 Leadenhall Street and 4-5 Billiter Street in the City of London planning application no. 12/00870/FULEIA Strategic planning application stage II referral (new powers) Town & Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended); Greater London Authority Acts 1999 and 2007; Town & Country Planning (Mayor of London) Order 2008 The proposal Demolition of existing buildings and redevelopment with a 39-storey (190 metre) office-led mixed use development The applicant The applicant is W.R. Berkley Corporation and the architect is Kohn Pedersen Fox Strategic issues The provision of new high quality office floorspace in the heart of the City of London is strongly supported. Strategic issues relating to tall buildings, views and World Heritage Sites, urban and inclusive design, climate change and transport have been satisfactorily resolved. The Corporation’s decision In this instance the Corporation of London has resolved to grant permission. Recommendation That the Corporation of London be advised that the Mayor is content for it to determine the case itself, subject to any action that the Secretary of State may take, and does not therefore wish to direct refusal or direct that he is to be the local planning authority. Context 1 On 1 October 2012 the Mayor of London received documents from the Corporation of London notifying him of a planning application of potential strategic importance to develop the above site for the above uses. This was referred to the Mayor under Category 1C of the Schedule to the Order 2008: 1C: Development which comprises or includes the erection of a building of one or more of the page 1 following descriptions— (b) the building is more than 150 metres high and is in the City of London 2 On 7 November 2012 the Mayor considered planning report PDU/3015/01, and subsequently advised the Corporation of London that. -
The London Office Crane Survey – Summer 2017 Development Table
The London Office Crane Survey – Summer 2017 Development table Scheme Crane Survey Completion Total space Space Status Market Scheme name Postcode Developer Tenant number status date sq ft available sq ft 1 Under Construction City Bloomberg Place EC4 Bloomberg/Stanhope Bloomberg Q2 2017 669,000 - 2 Under Construction City 1 London Wall Place EC2 Brookfield/Oxford Properties Schroders Q2 2017 309,000 - 3 Under Construction City 20 Old Bailey EC4 Blackstone Barings Q2 2017 240,410 127,585 4 Under Construction City 2 London Wall Place EC2 Brookfield/Oxford Properties Cleary Gottlieb Steen Q2 2017 177,000 129,000 & Hamilton 5 Under Construction City 45 Cannon Street EC4 Morgan Capital Partners LLP Q2 2017 88,500 88,500 6 Under Construction City The Hallmark Building, EC3 TH Real Estate Q2 2017 88,000 88,000 56 Leadenahll Street 7 Under Construction City The Epworth, 25 City Road EC1 London and Regional Properties Q2 2017 66,000 66,000 8 Under Construction City 15 Bishopsgate EC2 Tower Partnership WeWork Q2 2017 52,000 - 9 Under Construction City 33 Queen Street EC4 Beltane Asset Management Q2 2017 50,000 50,000 10 Under Construction City 1 Aylesbury Street EC1 Meritcape Alexander McQueen Q2 2017 28,500 - 11 Under Construction City 25-39 Eastcheap EC3 Thackeray Estates Q2 2017 25,000 25,000 12 Under Construction City 19-28 Watling Street EC4 Morgan Capital Partners LLP Q2 2017 21,000 21,000 13 Under Construction City 181 Queen Victoria Street EC4V City Bridge Trust Q2 2017 17,000 17,000 14 Under Construction City 33 Central, 33 King William -
City Office Market Watch
UK Commercial – August 2019 MARKET IN City Office MINUTES Savills Research Market Watch July sees over 1m sq ft of take-up due to high pre- letting, ensuring supply will remain constrained Take-up for July reached 1,026,352 sq ft across 29 deals, having also accounted for 21% of take-up so far this year. resulting in the total for the year reaching 3.5m sq ft, which Last month saw three deals to WeWork alone equating to 11 pre-lets is down on this point last year by 17%. However, this is the 84,026 sq ft, and IWG pre-let the whole of 68 King William so far this year largest single month of take-up since August 2017 and is Street, EC4 equating to 78,000 sq ft, which is the third compared with 12 at this now up on the 10-year average take-up to the end of July largest deal this year to a serviced office provider. point last year by 2%. This brings the 12-month rolling total to 6.9m sq ft, of which 85% has been of a grade A standard. Total City supply fell last month following the strong levels of take-up and currently stands at 6.4m sq ft, falling by 3% We expect to see take-up continue at this strong rate for on the end of last month and equating to a vacancy rate of the remainder of the year as there is currently just under 5.0%, which is down on July 2018 by 30 bps, and down on 2m sq ft of space under-offer, which is up on the long-term the long term average by 160 bps. -
In the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Richmond Division
Case 20-32299-KLP Doc 258 Filed 06/09/20 Entered 06/09/20 14:05:46 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 37 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 11 ) INTELSAT S.A., et al.1 ) Case No. 20-32299 (KLP) ) Debtors. ) (Jointly Administered) ) AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE I, Victoria X. Tran, depose and say that I am employed by Stretto, the claims and noticing agent for the Debtors in the above-captioned case. On June 1, 2020, at my direction and under my supervision, employees of Stretto caused the following documents to be served via first-class mail on the service list attached hereto as Exhibit A: • Debtors’ Motion for Entry of Interim and Final Orders (A) Authorizing the Payment of Certain Prepetition Taxes and Fees and (B) Granting Related Relief (Docket No. 12) • Interim Order (A) Authorizing the Payment of Certain Prepetition Taxes and Fees and (B) Granting Related Relief (Docket No. 135) • Order Setting an Expedited Hearing on “First Day Motions” and for Related Relief (Docket No. 142) Furthermore, on June 1, 2020, at my direction and under my supervision, employees of Stretto caused the following documents to be served via first-class mail on the service list attached hereto as Exhibit B, and via electronic mail on the service list attached hereto as Exhibit C: • Notice of Filing Revised Final Order and Documents Related to the Debtors’ Motion for Entry Of a Final Order (A) Authorizing the Debtors To Obtain Postpetition Financing, (B) Granting Liens and Superpriority Administrative Expense Claims, (C) Granting Adequate Protection to the Prepetition Secured Parties, (D) Modifying the Automatic Stay, and (E) Granting Related Relief (Docket No. -
Car Free Day Map-Lores
E C C E J R O N H O PLA H A H NBU M A N T I GHW WELL L RY A Q TR S S S EET E UNDLE TREET T USE S S ARDEN R L A G R S E 43 E S I E S Steps T L H N 78 127-131 T L A EECH OOR T U RHOU Steps S H P L E K B T Project IGHW T 35 L Y R FARRIN GDORHO NR N N STRE CROWN ARDE L The Charterhouse F A Shakespeare M E C A L I S H S E X C H A N G E G Whitechapel O Gallery ’ KNO C O 1 201 E T The R X 67 T Old A S S QUA R E E R TON ARTE A Square School Tower M 2 125 102 ALK L I T T N Barbican L 1 K A TON WODEHAM R H 42 33 Steps Steps 1 I T T Y S T R E E T T S T REE R Farringdon URY 1 E D PRINC ELET B U K F Rookery C S C O 15 A N P EECH 37 S N N 20 T B Lift U 125 STRE E T H M R PRINCEL ET IRBY F T EET T 104 Steps E 32 GARDE R 34 STR E E 26 Bishops Spitalfields S H Steps M O I Cowcross Street E T T E 56 Barbican NSB E E D Centre C 5 E W L E A FOE HITE 30 N Lauderdale I C E T R V R OW R O S S S T R E T P L E Square K 73 S Y R F C C LA S A T 8 Guildhall School of A R Brady Arts & L E C I LK O CKINGTON ST 36 OSS S S H N N E P P PUM E S I A ALDER A CO 85 Tower Defoe S E Market U R T T 1 U PL L P M T I 60 O Barbican Library TREET A E 3 E A L H I 29 C E L AUDERDAL E Music & Drama - E Community A 93 K W R E R R NDSEY House N S T N L E T E S 6 P L ACE R R EET Brick Lane EET T N L S H 29 to 35 90 F S R S R T PEE 2 D ’ T 25 G L A Milton Court M Centre R R ULBO E C D C 89 H REE CLOTH Steps H S 95 A S C Steps Steps Y Jamme Masjid G Barbican I G T W E A 84 A R OURT E S H R ILSO A TREE NHITL L W E R E U A E 87 A ALK E L D KESIDE TER N O N N U 39 T ST S T Finsbury CL U 176 -
City of London Wardmote Polls
LONDON ELECTORAL HISTORY – STEPS TOWARDS DEMOCRACY 8.3 WARDMOTE POLLS Note (1): See section 3.3.2 for a discussion of the wardmote freeman householder franchise and the quasi-wardmote householder franchise. Note (2): The data available vary from election to election and are often incomplete as indicated variously below by null fields, Notes and other devices. The intention has been to record all surviving data for each election. Note (3): The names of those recorded as elected are in SMALL CAPITALS and the names of unsuccessful candidates are in lower case. 8.3.1 Aldersgate, 1734-1830: 28 polls (8 common councilmen; 251 freeman householders in 1833) Table 8.3.1.a Precincts in Aldersgate Code Precinct 1st Out 1st Without 2nd Out 2nd Without 3rd Out 3rd Without 4th Out 4th Without A & A St Ann & St Agnes Leonard St Leonard Staining St Mary Staining Zachary St John Zachary Note: All electors in the ward were entitled to choose from among all the candidates but, in the larger wards, those elected as common councilmen were taken to represent specific precincts, which were electoral sub-divisions of the ward (whose boundaries, confusingly, did not automatically match the parish ecclesiastical boundaries). 2 LONDON ELECTORAL HISTORY Table 8.3.1.1 Poll for common councilmen of Aldersgate, 8 January 1734 Forename Surname Precinct Livery Votes received RICHARD BAYLEY 240 JOHN WILLKINS 240 EDWARD CHOWNE 239 SAMUEL BALLARD 233 SAMUEL SMITH 231 JOHN SNART 227 GEORGE JAMES 227 THOMAS SKIPP 227 Richard Scarr 117 Samwell Knight 114 Source: Grub Street Journal, 27 December 1733. -
London's Skyline and Streetscape Are Undergoing Considerable Change
in LONDONLondon’s skyline and streetscape are undergoing considerable change and Xypex is participating on many of the city’s most visually dominant, award-winning, and culturally important new and revitalised structures. The architects, engineers and contractors of these developments have avidly endorsed Xypex to waterproof, protect and enhance the durability of their buildings’ concrete. in LONDON From the United Kingdom’s tallest building to London’s most luxurious address and a myriad of fascinating structures in-between, Xypex is there, providing products and services to make concrete better. It feels good to be playing a major role in the current construction dynamics of Central London. It’s also rewarding to be rubbing shoulders with some of the world’s finest architects and engineers as they rework the structural form and function of one of western culture’s most famous business hubs. We give a nod to the Romans and the remnants of the original Roman Wall that still define the outer boundaries of Central London, and also a nod to the likes of Dickens and Shakespeare who trod the very paths that today’s creative teams are revitalising. THE SHARD 32 London Bridge Street The Shard, with its church steeple and cladded shards of glass, is the inspiration and design of Renzo Piano, the project’s architect. At 95-storeys and standing 309.6 metres (1,016 ft) high, The Shard (‘Shard of Glass’) is the tallest building in the UK – a top-down construction project that required the largest continuous concrete pour in UK history; three concrete pumps placed 700 truckloads over 36 hours; a total of 5,500 m3. -
52-54 Lime Street (Scalpel) - S278 Highway Changes to Accommodate New Development (HTM 1234) Report Of: for Decision Director of the Built Environment
Committees: Dates: Corporate Projects Board 13 April 2015 Projects Sub 06 May 2015 Subject: Public Gateway 1 & 2 Project Proposal: 52-54 Lime Street (Scalpel) - s278 Highway Changes to Accommodate New Development (HTM 1234) Report of: For Decision Director of the Built Environment Project Summary 1. Context The 52-54 Lime Street development (also known as the Scalpel) will be the new European headquarters of American insurance firm WR Berkley. It is located at the corner of Leadenhall Street and Lime Street, opposite Lloyds of London, in the Ward of Aldgate. Planning permission for the development was granted on 11 June 2013 and varied on 15 May 2014. This project relates to the Section 278 highway works that are necessary to integrate the development into the public highway and must be delivered in time for the building‟s practical completion (estimated November 2017). The s278 Agreement was concluded on 28 January 2015. In a wider context, Leadenhall Street forms part of the Strategic Road Network (SRN) as defined by the Traffic Management Act 2004. 2. Brief description The project involves highway changes to accommodate the of project new development as shown in Appendix 1. These include: (a) Improving footways at Leadenhall Street, Lime Street and Billiter Street; (b) Installing two communal utility chambers; (c) Upgrading the existing traffic management gate at Lime Street to a security-rated gate; and (d) Removal of redundant crossover and the provision of a new crossover at the loading bay entrance. 3. Consequences if If the project is not approved, the development will not project not integrate seamlessly with the highway surrounding it.