DOCSLIB.ORG

MASTERS ESSAY SUBMISSION FORM First Marker's Name

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MASTERS ESSAY SUBMISSION FORM First Marker's Name View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Aberystwyth Research Portal MASTERS ESSAY SUBMISSION FORM This piece of assessed work is the result of my own work, except Student Number:_______ _______ where otherwise stated. All sources are acknowledged by footnotes and bibliography where appropriate. I have read and understood the Module Number: ___IPM0060______________ Department’s guidelines on plagiarism. I understand that I am not permitted to submit the same piece of work for assessment in two different modules (please tick) Module Title: _____Dissertation________________ __________________________________________________ Signed: _______________________________ Course Work Title: Scott’s Great Snake,, to what Extent was Coastal warfare Crucial to the Outcome of the American Civil Print Name: ___Joseph Davies_________ War Email: ____ _________ No. of Words: ____ Registered dyslexic? / Please DO NOT stick the corner down, this will be done by office staff once submission of your essay is recorded Date of submission :______________________ First Marker’s name and comments Mark: PLEASE NOTE: Under University regulations all marks are subject to confirmation by the External Examiner Save your essay so that the file name reads: surname - first name – module code eg: Strauss Andrew IPM1030 NOW - SUBMIT the electronic copy of your essay via your module site on BLACKBOARD For further information re essay submission procedures please see http://www.aber.ac.uk/en/interpol/current-students Second marker’s name and comments: Mark: Second Marker’s name and comments: External Examiner’s Comments 2 1st Markers Mark 2nd Marker’s Mark Agreed Mark _____________________________________________________________________ ___________ Explanation of reconciliation of marks 3 MSc(Econ) in the Department of International Politics, Aberystwyth University Dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of MSc(Econ) in International History ‘Scott’s Great Snake,’ to what Extent was Coastal Warfare Crucial to the Outcome of the American Civil War? Joseph Davies September 2012 4 The word length of this dissertation is …………… DECLARATION This work has not previously been accepted in substance for any degree and is not being concurrently submitted in candidature for any other degree. Signed………………………………………. (Candidate) Date………………………………………….. STATEMENT 1 This work is the result of my own investigations, except where otherwise stated. Where correction services have been used, the extent and nature of the correction is clearly marked in a footnote(s). Other sources are acknowledged by footnotes giving explicit references. A bibliography is appended. Signed………………………………………. (Candidate) Date………………………………………….. STATEMENT 2 I hereby give consent for my work, if accepted, to be available for photocopying and for inter-library loan, and for the title and summary to be made available to outside organisations. Signed………………………………………. (Candidate) Date………………………………………….. 5 6 ~ Table of Contents ~ ~ Abstract ~ ~ Scott’s Great Snake - Introduction ~ ~ 1. ~ ~ From the Chesapeake to the Mississippi …and Beyond – Blockade and Blockade Running ~ ~ 2. ~ ‘Within gunshot of salt water’ Coastal Land Operations ~ 3. ~ ~ Brother Jonathan, John Bull and King Cotton - the International Dimension ~ ~ ‘Laying Siege to Land-Power’ – Conclusion ~ ~ Appendix ~ ~ Bibliography ~ ~ Picture Credits ~ 7 ~ Abstract ~ Scott’s Great Snake examines the extent to which coastal operations were crucial to the outcome of the American Civil War of 1861-65. The focus falls on three key areas, blockade, land operations and international relations as they interacted with coastal war. Particular weight is given to the blockade as the main method of Union coastal warfare, to which the other two efforts related to a greater or lesser degree. Land actions served to reinforce the blockade while offering ambitious Northern officers the chance to directly influence events. Foreign relations were important to the North’s ability to continue to strangle its erstwhile members into submission due to the United States’ small stature next to the European imperial powers of the day, whose navies would have rendered coastal warfare impossible had they intervened. The cumulative effects of a strangling blockade reinforced and complimented by sympathetic land actions and the failure or success of the American belligerents’ foreign policy served to facilitate the weakening and eventual failure of the Confederate home and fighting fronts shaping the conditions in which the North’s land armies were able to triumph in 1865. 8 ~ Scott’s Great Snake ~ ‘Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead!’1 In many way the possibly apocryphal words of Admiral David Glasgow Farragut upon seeing the ironclad monitor Tecumseh disappear beneath the waves in two minutes after hitting a mine in the opening phase of the Battle of Mobile Bay, sum up the attitude of many to naval, and especially coastal, operations in the American Civil War. The words are picturesque, Farragut was a picturesque man. He was a formidable Admiral, a veteran of fifty years in the United States Navy. When he gave his famous order he supposedly was lashed to the rigging of his flagship, Hartford, having refused the pleas of his officers to descend to the deck, lest he fall and be killed. This only serves to add a further level of novelty and martial splendour to the occasion, yet what the throwaway quote ultimately represents more than anything is the low esteem in which the naval dimension is held in many studies of the wider conflict. In general, Mobile Bay is one of a small number of coastal battles, along with the fight between the Monitor and the Merrimac/Virginia in Hampton Roads, New Orleans and perhaps the bombardment of Fort Pulaski, Tennessee, which have intruded, if they have intruded at all, into the popular study of the War Between the States. Far 1 Hearn, Chester G. Admiral David Glasgow Farragut The Civil War Years (Annapolis, Md. Naval Institute Press, 1998) pp262-3 9 more storied in naval terms are the exploits of the Confederate raiders, the Florida, Shenandoah and especially the Alabama. These picturesque ships were commanded by picturesque captains and fought a picturesque war largely free from the blood and carnage of Fredericksburg, Shiloh or Antietam, or the boredom of the blockade. For all this the actions of the famed Confederate raiders, vexatious as they were to the North and especially its commerce, ultimately influenced the outcome of the War only in a somewhat peripheral sense.2 Perhaps the weight given to the Southern cruisers is because glorious sea battles and picturesque ships, were comparatively rare and thus they have become famous as discrete incidents, notable enough for mention in their own right, but wholly disconnected from the larger campaigns of which they formed a part. The way in which War’s land campaigns, especially the glorious Eastern battles, have monopolised scholarship has served to marginalise the significance of naval warfare to the final outcome of the conflict. The wealth of sources available on the land dimension provides valuable context for a naval study, as well as information on its broader effects. But conclusions must be drawn by piecing together details from many smaller and more specific works. Foreign policy too, despite its importance to the North’s victory has also existed on the fringes of mainstream study. Domestic politics are usually more popular subject, especially in 2 Konstam, Angus Confederate Raider 1861-65 (Oxford, Osprey 2003) p4 10 terms of their role in the origins of the War, Abraham Lincoln’s emancipation policies and his 1864 election victory; studies of which again usually attribute only peripheral importance to naval or coastal warfare. In many ways this can be attributed to the fact that the greatest part played by the US Navy in attacking the Confederacy was not upon the high seas in naval actions contested in the best traditions of daring and glory à la Nelson (or in a more distinctly American context) Decatur or John Paul Jones. It was along the southern coastline from Virginia to Texas that the greater part of the naval war took place. This coastal dimension remains unglamorous. The preponderance of coastal operations, constituting the most muscular coils of the titular serpent, consisted of blockade, by far the most significant, and often most ignored, of the Union’s seaborne efforts to win the war. Blockade was the earliest identified and most resource intensive method employed by the North against the Confederacy, as such much of what the North did in naval terms was directly or indirectly connected with maintaining its choking effect. As a subject blockade can be dull, especially when its importance is only peripherally acknowledged. Enjoying a similar tendency to dreariness are the efforts made by the North in international diplomacy in order that the Union could continue to conduct its strangling campaign unmolested. This is in itself odd, 11 since the sphere of both Northern and Southern diplomacy contains at least as many picturesque characters as does the military effort. The sphere of Civil War international politics includes the likes of William H. Seward, Lincoln’s secretary of state, a man prone to alcohol-induced, vituperative rhetoric against Britain. Then there are the Confederate commissioners, among them William Lowndes Yancey (who desired a resumption of the African slave trade) and John Slidell, a man of whom it was said that if locked in a cell (as he would find himself in 1861) he ‘would conspire with the mice against the cat.’3 The Civil war’s international diplomacy was vital to the continuance of the North’s coastal war against the South yet even in the event that the importance of the latter has been acknowledged, the diplomatic aspect has still found itself treated in discrete terms much as have the individual engagements in all but a small number of works. The ‘Trent Affair,’ though an undeniably important crisis point in Union-British foreign relations, is often the only major penetration of the political sphere into the study of the Civil War and its naval dimension.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Many-Storied Place
    A Many-storied Place Historic Resource Study Arkansas Post National Memorial, Arkansas Theodore Catton Principal Investigator Midwest Region National Park Service Omaha, Nebraska 2017 A Many-Storied Place Historic Resource Study Arkansas Post National Memorial, Arkansas Theodore Catton Principal Investigator 2017 Recommended: {){ Superintendent, Arkansas Post AihV'j Concurred: Associate Regional Director, Cultural Resources, Midwest Region Date Approved: Date Remove not the ancient landmark which thy fathers have set. Proverbs 22:28 Words spoken by Regional Director Elbert Cox Arkansas Post National Memorial dedication June 23, 1964 Table of Contents List of Figures vii Introduction 1 1 – Geography and the River 4 2 – The Site in Antiquity and Quapaw Ethnogenesis 38 3 – A French and Spanish Outpost in Colonial America 72 4 – Osotouy and the Changing Native World 115 5 – Arkansas Post from the Louisiana Purchase to the Trail of Tears 141 6 – The River Port from Arkansas Statehood to the Civil War 179 7 – The Village and Environs from Reconstruction to Recent Times 209 Conclusion 237 Appendices 241 1 – Cultural Resource Base Map: Eight exhibits from the Memorial Unit CLR (a) Pre-1673 / Pre-Contact Period Contributing Features (b) 1673-1803 / Colonial and Revolutionary Period Contributing Features (c) 1804-1855 / Settlement and Early Statehood Period Contributing Features (d) 1856-1865 / Civil War Period Contributing Features (e) 1866-1928 / Late 19th and Early 20th Century Period Contributing Features (f) 1929-1963 / Early 20th Century Period
    [Show full text]
  • Burst of New Orleans
    CONFEDERATE HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION OF BELGIUM NavalHistorical Center) ( battleof New Orleans The I I was ordered to report to Commodore W.C. Whittle, commanding the naval station at New Orleans, for duty afloat. A powerful fleet of ships of war and bomb vessels, under the command of Commodore (afterwards Admiral) D. G. Farragut, was then assembling at the mouth of the Mississippi, for an attack upon New Orleans, in which a large land force under General Ben Butler (afterwards called the Beast) was to cooperate. The citizens were under the impression that the place was impregnable. General J. Duncan1, commanding Forts Jackson and St. Philip, below the city, was considered one of the best artillerists in the service ; and the land defense was entrusted to General M. Lovell, with a well appointed force under his command. The people of that gay city were occupied as usual in business and pleasure, and continued unconscious of their peril up to the very time when the Federal fleet passed the forts. But the condition of affairs, so far as naval defense was concerned, was lamentable. The regular C. S. naval fleet consisted of the CSS Louisiana (Captain C.F. McIntosh2) and carrying the flag of Commodore Mitchell ; the steamer McRae (Captain T.B. Huger), carrying six light 32-pounders and nine-inch pivot gun ; the steamer Jackson (Captain F.B. Renshaw), with two pivoted smooth bore 32-pounders ; the small iron plated Ram Manassas (Captain A.F. Warley), carrying one 32-pounder carronade in the bow ; and two launches, each carrying a howitzer and a crew of twenty men.
    [Show full text]
  • The Civil War Naval Campaign for Memphis
    To Retain Command of the Mississippi To Retain Command of the Mississippi The Civil War Naval Campaign for Memphis Edward B. McCaul Jr. University of Tennessee / Knoxville u Copyright © 2014 by The University of Tennessee Press / Knoxville. All Rights Reserved. Manufactured in the United States of America. First Edition. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data McCaul, Edward B., 1951- To retain command of the Mississippi : the Civil War naval campaign for Memphis / Edward B. McCaul Jr. — First edition. pages cm Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-62190-135-8 1. Memphis, Battle of, Memphis, Tenn., 1862 2. Mississippi River Valley—History—Civil War, 1861-1865—Naval operations. I. Title. II. Title: Civil War naval campaign for Memphis. E473.5.M33 2014 973.7'32—dc23 2014023334 To my father, Edward B. McCaul, who served in the United States Navy during World War II. Contents Preface xi Acknowledgments xxi Chapter 1. The Importance of the Mississippi River 1 Chapter 2. The Confederate River Defense Fleet 9 Chapter 3. The Union Fleets 27 Chapter 4. The Situation 77 Chapter 5. The Battle of Plum Point 95 Chapter 6. The Fall of Fort Pillow 115 Chapter 7. The Battle of Memphis 127 Chapter 8. The Aftermath 145 Chapter 9. Rams versus Guns 155 Conclusion: The Impact of the Battle of Memphis 163 Appendix A. History of the Boats 167 Appendix B. Biographies 173 Appendix C. Acting Volunteer Lieutenant Commander William R. Hoel 179 Notes 185 Bibliography 233 Index 241 Illustrations Figures USS General Bragg 20 Monarch Ramming
    [Show full text]
  • Yashwanth Kandula, Tejas Prakash, and Ashwin Sriram Junior Division Group Website Annotated Bibliography Primary Sources Buchana
    Yashwanth Kandula, Tejas Prakash, and Ashwin Sriram Junior Division Group Website Annotated Bibliography Primary Sources Buchanan, Franklin. "Report of Flag Officer Buchanan, Battle at Hampton Roads." The Civil War, Primary Source Media, 1999. American Journey. Gale In Context: Middle School, https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/EJ2151000113/MSIC?u=plea37222&sid=MSIC&xid=8cd ee. Accessed 30 Dec. 2019. This primary source clearly detailed the events of March 9, 1862, the Battle of Hampton Roads, in the eyes of Captain Franklin Buchanan. It represented the view of a Confederate, and since most of the sources are written from the Union perspective, this allowed us to see a new point of view. I found the text clear, and I could visualize what the captain was going through in the battle. National Endowment for the Humanities. “Cincinnati Daily Press. [Volume] (Cincinnati [Ohio]) 1860-1862, December 24, 1861, Image 4.” News about Chronicling America ​ RSS, Henry Reed & Co., ​ Yashwanth Kandula, Tejas Prakash, and Ashwin Sriram Junior Division Group Website chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn84028745/1861-12-24/ed-1/seq-4/#date1=1861&index =1&rows=20&searchType=advanced&language=&sequence=0&words=Continental Iron iron work worked WORKING works Works&proxdistance=5&date2=1861&ortext=continental iron works&proxtext=&phrasetext=&andtext=&dateFilterType=yearRange&page=1. This primary source was a Cincinnati newspaper that detailed the development and construction of ironclad warships. It had ten sections ranging from the hull to the warship’s utility. It was very descriptive and allowed me to think about how the vessel would have been constructed and designed.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 11: the Civil War, 1861-1865
    The Civil War 1861–1865 Why It Matters The Civil War was a milestone in American history. The four-year-long struggle determined the nation’s future. With the North’s victory, slavery was abolished. During the war, the Northern economy grew stronger, while the Southern economy stagnated. Military innovations, including the expanded use of railroads and the telegraph, coupled with a general conscription, made the Civil War the first “modern” war. The Impact Today The outcome of this bloody war permanently changed the nation. • The Thirteenth Amendment abolished slavery. • The power of the federal government was strengthened. The American Vision Video The Chapter 11 video, “Lincoln and the Civil War,” describes the hardships and struggles that Abraham Lincoln experienced as he led the nation in this time of crisis. 1862 • Confederate loss at Battle of Antietam 1861 halts Lee’s first invasion of the North • Fort Sumter fired upon 1863 • First Battle of Bull Run • Lincoln presents Emancipation Proclamation 1859 • Battle of Gettysburg • John Brown leads raid on federal ▲ arsenal at Harpers Ferry, Virginia Lincoln ▲ 1861–1865 ▲ ▲ 1859 1861 1863 ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ 1861 1862 1863 • Russian serfs • Source of the Nile River • French troops 1859 emancipated by confirmed by John Hanning occupy Mexico • Work on the Suez Czar Alexander II Speke and James A. Grant City Canal begins in Egypt 348 Charge by Don Troiani, 1990, depicts the advance of the Eighth Pennsylvania Cavalry during the Battle of Chancellorsville. 1865 • Lee surrenders to Grant at Appomattox Courthouse • Abraham Lincoln assassinated by John Wilkes Booth 1864 • Fall of Atlanta HISTORY • Sherman marches ▲ A.
    [Show full text]
  • CSS Georgia 2007 New South Assoc Rpt.Pdf
    I J K L New South Assciates • 6150 East Ponce de Leon Avenue • Stone Mountain, Georgia 30083 CSS Georgia: Archival Study CONTRACT NO. DACW21-99-D-0004 DELIVERY ORDER 0029 Report submitted to: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Savannah District 100 West Oglethorpe Avenue Savannah, Georgia 31402-0889 Report submitted by: New South Associates 6150 East Ponce de Leon Avenue Stone Mountain, Georgia 30083 _____________________________________ Mary Beth Reed - Principal Investigator Authors: Mark Swanson, New South Associates – Historian and Robert Holcombe, National Civil War Naval Museum – Historian New South Associates Technical Report 1092 January 31, 2007 CSS GEORGIA iii ARCHIVAL STUDY Table of Contents Introduction 1 Part One: Historical Context 3 The Setting: Geography of the Savannah Area 3 Pre-War Economic Developments, 1810-1860 5 Changes in Warfare, 1810-1860 6 Initial Development of Confederate Navy, 1861 – March 1862 8 Confederate Navy Reorganization, 1862-1863 17 Josiah Tattnall and the Beginnings of the Savannah Squadron, Early 1861 20 War Comes to Savannah, November 1861 – April 1862 23 Impetus for Georgia: The Ladies Gunboat Association 28 Construction of Georgia, March – October 1862 32 The Placement of Georgia, Late 1862 34 The Savannah Station and Squadron, 1862-1864 36 Fall of Savannah, December 1864 39 Part Two: CSS Georgia - Research Themes 41 Planning and Construction 41 1. Individuals and Organizations Involved in Fund-Raising 41 2. Evidence for Conception of Construction Plans for the Vessel; Background and Skill of Those Involved and an Estimate of How Long They Worked on the Project 45 3. Evidence for the Location of the Construction Site, the Site Where the Engine and Machinery Were Installed, and a Description of These Facilities 48 4.
    [Show full text]
  • An Investigation Into British Neutrality During the American Civil War 1861-65
    AN INVESTIGATION INTO BRITISH NEUTRALITY DURING THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR 1861-65 BY REBECCA CHRISTINE ROBERTS-GAWEN A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of MA by Research Department of History University of Birmingham November 2015 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract This thesis sought to investigate why the British retained their policy of neutrality throughout the American Civil War, 1861-65, and whether the lack of intervention suggested British apathy towards the conflict. It discovered that British intervention was possible in a number of instances, such as the Trent Affair of 1861, but deliberately obstructed Federal diplomacy, such as the Emancipation Proclamation of 1863. This thesis suggests that the British public lacked substantial and sustained support for intervention. Some studies have suggested that the Union Blockade of Southern ports may have tempted British intervention. This thesis demonstrates how the British sought and implemented replacement cotton to support the British textile industry. This study also demonstrates that, by the outbreak of the Civil War, British society lacked substantial support for foreign abolitionists’’ campaigns, thus making American slavery a poorly supported reason for intervention.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Britain and King Cotton: the Lancashire Cotton
    GREAT BRITAIN AND KING COTTON: THE LANCASHIRE COTTON FAMINE AND THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR RYAN D KELL The Colorado College Department of History-Political Science Copyright © by Ryan D. Kell 2015 GREAT BRITAIN AND KING COTTON: THE LANCASHIRE COTTON FAMINE AND THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR by RYAN D KELL THESIS Presented to the Faculty of the Undergraduate School of The Colorado College In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of HISTORY-POLITICAL SCIENCE Department of History-Political Science THE COLORADO COLLEGE 2015 Acknowledgments I cannot express enough thanks to my thesis advisor, Lindsey Flewelling, Visiting Professor of History at Colorado College. Lindsey Was alWays Willing to help me With this project, Whether it Was With research or editing, while working a busy schedule of her own. I am extremely grateful for all the assistance she provided, and I could not have completed this task Without her. I would also like to thank David Hendrickson, Professor of Political Science at Colorado College. David helped me to polish my final product, making sure that I Was accurate and as persuasive With my argument as possible. My completion of this project Would not have been possible Without the help of my tWo academic advisors, Bryant “Tip” Ragan and Peter Blasenheim, both Professors of History at Colorado College. Tip, as my primary academic advisor, helped me navigate my four years of college and I Would not have been in position to graduate without him. Peter, my major advisor, has helped me to complete both my thesis and all my major requirements, always willing to give his honest opinion.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sea Hunters by Clive Cussler Synopsis: a Nonfiction Work by The
    Generated by ABC Amber LIT Converter, http://www.processtext.com/abclit.html The Sea Hunters By Clive Cussler Synopsis: A nonfiction work by the creator of Dirk Pitt, this book tells thirteen tales of searches for shipwrecks. The circumstances surrounding each are described in detail along with the searches. This book reads like a novel. Among the shipwrecks are the C.S.S. Hunley, a confederate submarine-the first to sink a ship in battle, The Leopoldville, a troop transport torpedoed by a German u-boat on Christmas eve, 1944 and the discovery of U-20, the german sub that sank the Lucitania in 1915. Dirk Pitt Adventures by Clive Cussler Shock Wave Inca Gold Sahara Dragon Treasure Generated by ABC Amber LIT Converter, http://www.processtext.com/abclit.html cyclops Deep Six Pacific Vortex Night Probe! Vixen 03 Raise the Titanic! Iceberg The Mediterranean Caper Simon & Schuster SIMON & SCHUSTER Rockefeller Center 1230 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10020 The events depicted in this book and the people who are portrayed, past and present, were and are real. The historical events, however, although factual, were slightly dramatized and dialogue has been added. Generated by ABC Amber LIT Converter, http://www.processtext.com/abclit.html copyright (c) 1996 by Clive Cussler All rights reserved, including the right of reproduction in whole or in part in any form SIMON & SCHUSTER and colophon are registered trademarks of Simon & Schuster Inc. DIRK PITT is a registered trademark of Clive Cussler Designed by Levavi & Levavi Manufactured in the United States Of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Cussler, Clive.
    [Show full text]
  • Confederates and Cotton in East Texas
    East Texas Historical Journal Volume 48 Issue 1 Article 8 3-2010 Confederates and Cotton in East Texas Judy Gentry Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ethj Part of the United States History Commons Tell us how this article helped you. Recommended Citation Gentry, Judy (2010) "Confederates and Cotton in East Texas," East Texas Historical Journal: Vol. 48 : Iss. 1 , Article 8. Available at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ethj/vol48/iss1/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the History at SFA ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in East Texas Historical Journal by an authorized editor of SFA ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EASTTEXA.s HISTORICAL JOURNAL CONFEDERATES AND COrTONINEAST TEXAS by Judy Gentry The Union naval blockade of the Confederate coastline severely disruptedexisting marketing practices. Cotton producers east ofthe Brazos found their efforts to market their crops disrupted by the unavailability of shipping and the accelerating breakdown ofthe factorage system that had served their needs since the 1830s. The Union blockade, distance from the Mexican border and the main blockade--running port at Galveston, and the unavailability ofenough wagons and teams for overland transport ofcrops kept the gold value of their cotton in the low range. Government policies originating from the Confederate capital in Virginia and implemented by the Confederate army also affected the production and marketing of cotton in Texas east of the Brazos. The Confederate Produce Loan in 1861, a government cotton purchasing agent in 1863, Cotton Bureau policies in 1864 and early 1865, and in the last few months of the war, new Confederate Treasury Department rules greatly impacted the lives of cotton producers.
    [Show full text]
  • Propaganda Use by the Union and Confederacy in Great Britain During the American Civil War, 1861-1862 Annalise Policicchio
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Duquesne University: Digital Commons Duquesne University Duquesne Scholarship Collection Electronic Theses and Dissertations Summer 2012 Propaganda Use by the Union and Confederacy in Great Britain during the American Civil War, 1861-1862 Annalise Policicchio Follow this and additional works at: https://dsc.duq.edu/etd Recommended Citation Policicchio, A. (2012). Propaganda Use by the Union and Confederacy in Great Britain during the American Civil War, 1861-1862 (Master's thesis, Duquesne University). Retrieved from https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/1053 This Immediate Access is brought to you for free and open access by Duquesne Scholarship Collection. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Duquesne Scholarship Collection. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PROPAGANDA USE BY THE UNION AND CONFEDERACY IN GREAT BRITAIN DURING THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR, 1861-1862 A Thesis Submitted to the McAnulty College & Graduate School of Liberal Arts Duquesne University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for The Degree of Masters of History By Annalise L. Policicchio August 2012 Copyright by Annalise L. Policicchio 2012 PROPAGANDA USE BY THE UNION AND CONFEDERACY IN GREAT BRITAIN DURING THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR, 1861-1862 By Annalise L. Policicchio Approved May 2012 ____________________________ ______________________________ Holly Mayer, Ph.D. Perry Blatz, Ph.D. Associate Professor of History Associate Professor of History Thesis Director Thesis Reader ____________________________ ______________________________ James C. Swindal, Ph.D. Holly Mayer, Ph.D. Dean, McAnulty College & Graduate Chair, Department of History School of Liberal Arts iii ABSTRACT PROPAGANDA USE BY THE UNION AND CONFEDERACY IN GREAT BRITAIN DURING THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR, 1861-1862 By Annalise L.
    [Show full text]
  • Anaconda Plan/Union Blockade/Confederate Blockade Runners
    Anaconda Plan/Union Blockade/Confederate Blockade Runners By:Elishah and Gavin Interesting facts about The Anaconda plan Interesting facts about The Anaconda Plan ● The Anaconda plan is a name applied to a union Army outline strategy for suppressing the confederacy at the beginning of the American Civil War. ● The main purpose of the Anaconda plan was to defeat the rebellion by blockading southern parts and controlling the Mississippi river.This would isolate the south from the outside world. ● 90% was the confederate ships. They were able to break through the blockade in 1801 ● The plan had 3 Parts: ● Blockade of southern coastline. ● Take control of Mississippi river. ● Take richmond Virginia Interesting facts about The Union Blockade Interesting facts about The Union Blockade ● The Union blockade began just a few weeks after the start of the Civil War. Abraham Lincoln announced it on April 19, 1861. ● the Union continued to blockade the South throughout the Civil War until the war ended in 1865. ● The blockade idea was instituted by the Federal government just days after the firing on Fort Sumter which official started the Civil War. ● The Union Navy captured or destroyed around 1,500 blockade runner ships during the course of the Civil War. ● The blockade covered around 3,500 miles of coastline and 180 ports. Interesting facts about The Confederate Blockade Runners Interesting facts about The Confederate Blockade Runners ● On April 19, 1861, one week after Confederate forces attacked Fort Sumter, President Abraham Lincoln ordered the blockade. ● During the first two years of the Civil War, the blockade had very limited success.
    [Show full text]