A Call to Action for the Twenty-First Century

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Call to Action for the Twenty-First Century A CALL TO ACTION FOR THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY Landscape Architecture Foundation Copyrighted Material The new Landscape Declaration Copyrighted Material This is a Genuine Vireo Book A Vireo Book | Rare Bird Books 453 South Spring Street, Suite 302 Los Angeles, CA 90013 rarebirdbooks.com Copyright © 2017 by the Landscape Architecture Foundation first hardcover edition All rights reserved, including the right to reproduce this book or portions thereof in any form whatsoever, including but not limited to print, audio, and electronic. For more information, address: A Vireo Book | Rare Bird Books Subsidiary Rights Department, 453 South Spring Street, Suite 302, Los Angeles, CA 90013. Printed in Canada 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Publisher’s Cataloging-in-Publication data is available upon request. Copyrighted Material Contributors Diane Jones Allen Charles A. Birnbaum Azzurra Cox Ed Garza DesignJones LLC The Cultural Landscape GGN Zane Garway Foundation José Almiñana Julia Czerniak Christophe Girot Andropogon Associates Keith Bowers Syracuse University ETH Zurich Biohabitats Gerdo P. Aquino Ecological Restoration and M. Elen Deming Maria Goula SWA Management, Inc. University of Illinois at Cornell University University of Southern Urbana-Champaign California Jacky Bowring David Gouverneur Lincoln University Barbara Deutsch University of Pennsylvania Thomas Balsley Landscape Architecture Thomas Balsley Associates Joe Brown Foundation Adam Greenspan Planning and Design PWP Landscape Julie Bargmann Consulting Adviser to Tim Duggan Architecture University of Virginia AECOM Phronesis D.I.R.T. studio Debra Guenther Nina Chase Martha Fajardo Mithun Henri Bava Riverlife Grupo Verde Ltda Agence TER Kathryn Gustafson Karlsruhe Institute of Nette Compton Mark A. Focht GGN Technology Trust for Public Land New York City Parks and Gustafson Porter Recreation Alan M. Berger Claude Cormier Feng Han Massachusetts Institute of Claude Cormier + Associés Gina Ford Tongji University Technology Sasaki Associates James Corner Andrea Hansen Anita Berrizbeitia James Corner Field Christian Gabriel Stae Harvard Graduate School of Operations US General Services Fluxscape Design University of Pennsylvania Administration Copyrighted Material Susan Herrington Mikyoung Kim Blaine Merker Kate Orff University of British Mikyoung Kim Design Gehl Studio SCAPE Columbia Rhode Island School of Columbia University Design Elizabeth K. Meyer Randolph T. Hester University of Virginia Raquel Peñalosa Center for Ecological Mia Lehrer Raquel Peñalosa Architectes Democracy Mia Lehrer + Associates Brett Milligan du Paysage University of California, University of California, Berkeley Nina-Marie Lister Davis John Peterson Ryerson University Metamorphic Landscapes Harvard Graduate School of Kristina Hill PLANDFORM Design University of California, Tim Mollette-Parks Berkeley Christopher Marcinkoski Mithun Patrick L. Phillips University of Pennsylvania Urban Land Institute Alison B. Hirsch PORT Kathryn Moore University of Southern Birmingham City University Sarah Primeau California Liat Margolis space2place design inc foreground design agency University of Toronto Alpa Nawre Kansas State University Chris Reed Jeffrey Hou Deborah Marton Alpa Nawre Design Stoss University of Washington New York Restoration Harvard Graduate School of Project Ellen Neises Design Scott Irvine RANGE University of Manitoba Anuradha Mathur University of Pennsylvania Stephanie Rolley University of Pennsylvania Kansas State University Mark W. Johnson Cornelia Hahn Oberlander Civitas Adrian McGregor Mario Schjetnan McGregor Coxall Patricia M. O’Donnell Grupo de Diseño Urbano / Joanna Karaman Heritage Landscapes LLC GDU OLIN Karen M’Closkey University of Pennsylvania Laurie D. Olin Martha Schwartz PEG office of landscape + OLIN Martha Schwartz Partners architecture University of Pennsylvania Harvard Graduate School of Design Copyrighted Material Kelly Shannon Marc Treib University of Southern University of California, California Berkeley Dirk Sijmons Charles Waldheim H+N+S Landscape Harvard Graduate School of Architects Design Ken Smith Peter Walker Ken Smith Workshop PWP Landscape Architecture Laura Solano Michael Van Valkenburgh Richard Weller Associates University of Pennsylvania Nancy C. Somerville Marcel Wilson American Society of Bionic Landscape Architects Kongjian Yu Anne Whiston Spirn Peking University Massachusetts Institute of Turenscape Technology Frederick R. Steiner University of Texas at Austin Carl Steinitz Harvard Graduate School of Design Antje Stokman University of Stuttgart Copyrighted Material Copyrighted Material The earth is our client. —Grant Jones Copyrighted Material Contents v New Landscape Declaration Summit and xvi Preface Publication Project Team Barbara Deutsch vi About the Landscape Architecture Foundation xviii Chronology vi About the New Landscape Declaration Summit xx A Declaration of Concern vii 2016 LAF Board of Directors xxii The New Landscape Declaration ix Contributors PART I: INTRODUCTION 5 Chapter 1: Our Time? 13 Chapter 2: Text and Context: The 1966 Declaration of Concern Richard Weller Elizabeth K. Meyer PART II: THE NEED FOR ACTION 25 Chapter 3: Beyond Practice: Landscape Architects and the 41 Chapter 7: The Large-Scale Century Ahead Global Eco-Crisis Alan M. Berger Martha Schwartz 45 Chapter 8: Developing Landscapes of Resource Management 29 Chapter 4: Of Wilderness, Wild-ness, and Wild Things Alpa Nawre Nina-Marie Lister 49 Chapter 9: Landscape Architecture as Necessity 33 Chapter 5: The Environmental/Social Crisis and the Kelly Shannon Challenges of Informal Urbanization 53 Chapter 10: The Art of Survival David Gouverneur Kongjian Yu 37 Chapter 6: Evolution and Prospective Outlook Mario Schjetnan PART III: THE LANDSCAPE 61 Chapter 11: Boundary Expansion 81 Chapter 16: Landscape Beyond the Biotic: In Advocacy of a Charles A. Birnbaum Revised Litany 65 Chapter 12: Landscape City Christopher Marcinkoski James Corner 85 Chapter 17: For a Landscape-Led Urbanism 69 Chapter 13: The Landscape Architect as Urbanist of Our Age Henri Bava Charles Waldheim 89 Chapter 18: Topology and Landscape Experimentation 73 Chapter 14: Connecting Humans and Nature for an Ideal Future Christophe Girot Feng Han 93 Chapter 19: Regenerative Infrastructure Systems through 77 Chapter 15: Urban Ecology as Activism Urban Acupuncture Kate Orff Tim Duggan Copyrighted Material PART IV: THE FUTURE OF THE DISCIPLINE 101 Chapter 20: Into an Era of Landscape Humanism 123 Chapter 25: Landscape Architects as Advocates for Gina Ford Culture-Based Sustainable Development 105 Chapter 21: On the Future of Landscape Architecture Patricia O’Donnell Carl Steinitz 127 Chapter 26: Landscape Architecture: New Adventures 109 Chapter 22: Cities for People and Cities for the Planet Ahead Blaine Merker Dirk Sijmons 115 Chapter 23: The Declaration of Interdependence: Life, 131 Chapter 27: Less a Declaration Than Some Thoughts Liberty, and the Pursuit of Sustainable Happiness Marc Treib Randolph T. Hester 135 Chapter 28: Landscape Futures 119 Chapter 24: Manifesto about the Profession’s Future Gerdo P. Aquino Martha Fajardo PART V: VOICES OF THE FUTURE 143 Chapter 29: A Call for Broadened Communications and Craft 155 Chapter 32: The Reparation of our Epistemic Rift and a Joanna Karaman Return to Values 147 Chapter 30: Experimental Landscapes: The Power of the Scott Irvine Prototype 159 Chapter 33: Leadership Through Listening Nina Chase Tim Mollette-Parks 151 Chapter 31: Designing Constructed Ecosystems for a 163 Chapter 34: Landscape as Narrative Resilient Future Azzurra Cox Sarah Primeau PART VI: THE CALL TO ACTION 171 Chapter 35: Aesthetics Panel 191 Chapter 40: Private Practice Panel Discussion of the role of aesthetics and beauty Discussion of summit ideas as they relate to the work of design firms 175 Chapter 36: Ecology Panel 195 Chapter 41: Public Practice Panel Discussion on ecology in the age of climate change Discussion of the role of government and nonprofit sectors 179 Chapter 37: Society Panel 199 Chapter 42: Capacity Organizations Panel Discussion on diversity, cultural nuances, and more Perspectives from membership and related organizations 183 Chapter 38: Innovation Panel 203 Chapter 43: Retrospect and Prospect Panel Discussion on fostering innovation in landscape architecture Doyens of landscape architecture discuss the profession 187 Chapter 39: Academic Practice Panel Discussion on higher education, teaching, and research 208 Special Thanks 210 Image Captions and Credits Copyrighted Material Preface n June 2016, the Landscape Architecture Foundation (LAF) In preparation for the summit, LAF asked a diverse group convened 75 preeminent thinkers and influencers, as well of leading minds in contemporary landscape architecture to Ias over 600 attendees from around the world, to look at write their own declarations, reflecting on the 1966 declaration how landscape architecture can make its vital contribution to and landscape architecture’s achievements since then and help solve the defining issues of our time. The New Landscape offering bold ideas for what it should achieve in the future. Declaration: A Summit on Landscape Architecture and the These new declarations were presented at the summit on the Future, held at the University of Pennsylvania, marked 50 years first day. On the second day, nine panels, curated by theme, since Ian McHarg, Grady Clay, and other leading landscape responded to the declarations and engaged in lively debate architects composed LAF’s seminal 1966 Declaration of about how to realize landscape
Recommended publications
  • KAKI MARTIN, ASLA Principal PROFILE
    KAKI MARTIN, ASLA Principal PROFILE Ms. Martin is a landscape architect with nearly twenty years of practice experience. Her experience is based in public park and streetscape design in mostly urban conditions, institutional and open space master planning, and river edge landscapes. She has keen interest in and knowledge of the design and construction of public urban landscapes. She has extensive public design process experience and has led several multi-disciplinary projects in the public sector all of which included a wide range of stakeholder groups. Reaching consensus around the design of urban spaces that satisfy the programmatic needs of a constituant group in an artful and contemporary way is her primary goal. Recent work includes the re-design of Kennedy Plaza in Providence RI, the Kendall Square Main St streetscape and Longfellow Bridge median, and final design of Central Square in East Boston. Ms. Martin is an adjunct professor at the Rhode Island School of Design and taught in a similar capacity at the Graduate School of Design at Harvard University. Additionally, she has been a member of thesis advisory teams at the Boston Architectural College and continues to be a visiting design juror at many institutions including the Harvard Graduate School of Design, Rhode Island School of Design, and Wentworth Institute of Technology. She is currently the Vice Chair of the Cambridge Conservation Commission and the Boston Society of Landscape Architects Nominations Committee. Ms. Martin is also a founding member of Good Sports, a Boston based non-profit devoted to ensure that disadvantaged youth have the equipment they need to participate in organized athletic programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology Design
    ECOLOGY and DESIGN Ecological Literacy in Architecture Education 2006 Report and Proposal The AIA Committee on the Environment Cover photos (clockwise) Cornell University's entry in the 2005 Solar Decathlon included an edible garden. This team earned second place overall in the competition. Photo by Stefano Paltera/Solar Decathlon Students collaborating in John Quale's ecoMOD course (University of Virginia), which received special recognition in this report (see page 61). Photo by ecoMOD Students in Jim Wasley's Green Design Studio and Professional Practice Seminar (University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee) prepare to present to their client; this course was one of the three Ecological Literacy in Architecture Education grant recipients (see page 50). Photo by Jim Wasley ECOLOGY and DESIGN Ecological by Kira Gould, Assoc. AIA Literacy in Lance Hosey, AIA, LEED AP Architecture with contributions by Kathleen Bakewell, LEED AP Education Kate Bojsza, Assoc. AIA 2006 Report Peter Hind , Assoc. AIA Greg Mella, AIA, LEED AP and Proposal Matthew Wolf for the Tides Foundation Kendeda Sustainability Fund The contents of this report represent the views and opinions of the authors and do not necessarily represent the opinions of the American Institute of Architects (AIA). The AIA supports the research efforts of the AIA’s Committee on the Environment (COTE) and understands that the contents of this report may reflect the views of the leadership of AIA COTE, but the views are not necessarily those of the staff and/or managers of the Institute. The AIA Committee
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape and Art FS 2021 V10
    theory lab lecture series Landscape and Art FS 2021 V10 Landscape and art have been intertwined in our culture since time immemori- al, but from the early cave paintings of Lascaux depicting wilderness scenes, to contemporary art forms underscoring the demise of the planet, there is a world of difference. Western art built an idealized representation of landscape derived from literary constructs based on Alberti’s perspective. The one-point perspectives of Nicolas Poussin and the two-point perspectives of Claude Lorrain nurtured our imagination of nature in both the Baroque and Picturesque periods, with allego- rical references supporting these points of view. The intellectual effort behind these carefully crafted constructions mixed Christian symbolism with earlier Greek Nicolas Poussin (1594-1665), Paysage avec un mythology seamlessly. This particular period created a durable aesthetic frame- homme tué par un serpent, 1648, National Gallery London. work for landscapes that prevailed through the 19th-century Romantic period to this day. Whether Post-Romantic landscape aesthetics still matter in our strongly de-idealized, systemic and pragmatic world remains doubtful. But the absence of a valid alternative vision poses a serious problem for landscape at present. This absence has yielded a dislocated aesthetic for landscapes, in which the founding concepts of landscape and art are continually confused. This should not, however, be understood as a plea for a return to some foregone Classical period, but rather as a general comment on the facile image production of our age, as well as on how unreflected and unimaginative we have become with the landscapes that surround us.
    [Show full text]
  • María Bellalta Cromie, Asla Curriculum Vitae
    MARÍA BELLALTA CROMIE, ASLA CURRICULUM VITAE EDUCATION Harvard University Graduate School of Design, Master of Landscape Architecture Cambridge, Massachusetts University of Notre Dame College of Arts and Letters, Bachelor of Arts in Psychology, Fine Arts Concentration Notre Dame, Indiana ACADEMIC WORK Dean, School of Landscape Architecture Boston Architectural College, Boston, Massachusetts, Fall 2014-present Head, School of Landscape Architecture Boston Architectural College, Boston, Massachusetts, August 2011-Fall 2014 Landscape Architecture Accreditation Board Review, October 2013 Master of Landscape Architecture Initial Accreditation (2016) Bachelor of Landscape Architecture Re-accreditation (2019) Chair, Foundation Studies Boston Architectural College, Boston, Massachusetts, April 2014-Present Co-Chair, MARCOM, Marketing - Communications Committee Boston Architectural College, Boston, Massachusetts, Fall 2014-Present Director, Landscape Institute Boston Architectural College, Boston, Massachusetts, Fall 2014-Present Director, Advanced Interdisciplinary Studios Boston Architectural College, Boston, Massachusetts, December 2013-Present Visiting Faculty Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Escuela de Arquitectura y Diseño Urban Design Studio, Comuna de Santo Domingo, Medellín, Colombia Medellín, Colombia, May 2014 Adjunct Faculty, School of Landscape Architecture Boston Architectural College, Boston, Massachusetts, 2010-2011 Visiting Faculty Pontifica Universidad Católica de Chile, Escuela de Arquitectura Urban Park at La Quinta Normal
    [Show full text]
  • Downloadfile/616075 Toft, J
    REVIEW published: 30 April 2021 doi: 10.3389/fevo.2021.582041 Designing (for) Urban Food Webs Alexander J. Felson 1,2,3 and Aaron M. Ellison 4* 1 Melbourne School of Design, Faculty of Architecture, Building and Planning, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, 2 Connecticut Institute for Resilience and Climate Adaptation, University of Connecticut, Groton, CT, United States, 3 Urban Ecology and Design Lab and Ecopolitan Design, New Haven, CT, United States, 4 Harvard Forest, Harvard University, Petersham, MA, United States Interest is growing in designing resilient and ecologically rich urban environments that provide social and ecological benefits. Regenerative and biocentric designs fostering urban ecological habitats including food webs that provide ecosystem services for people and wildlife increasingly are being sought. However, the intentional design of urban landscapes for food webs remains in an early stage with few precedents and many challenges. In this paper, we explore the potential to design (for) urban food webs through collaborations between designers and ecologists. We start by examining the ecology and management of Jamaica Bay in New York City as a case study of an anthropogenic landscape where ecosystems are degraded and the integrity of extant food webs are intertwined with human agency. A subsequent design competition focusing on ecological design and management of this large-scale landscape for animal habitat and ecosystem Edited by: services for people illustrates how designers approach this anthropogenic landscape. Mary L. Cadenasso, This case study reveals that both designing urban landscapes for food webs and directly University of California, Davis, United States designing and manipulating urban food webs are complicated and challenging to achieve Reviewed by: and maintain, but they have the potential to increase ecological health of, and enhance Frederick R.
    [Show full text]
  • Elizabeth Kathryn Meyer, Landscape Architect, FASLA
    Elizabeth Kathryn Meyer, Landscape Architect, FASLA University of Virginia School of Architecture, Campbell Hall, 110 Bayly Drive, Charlottesville, VA 22904 Mailing address: University of Virginia School of Architecture, Box 400122, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4122 Home address: 2000 Thomson Road, Charlottesville, VA 22903-2421 telephone: 1.434.242.9565 mobile 1.434.924.6960 office email: [email protected] Education Master of Landscape Architecture, University of Virginia 1982 Masters Project, "The Garden as Urban Spatial Structuring Element" M.A. Historic Preservation. Minor: Landscape architecture history, Cornell University (coursework 1978-80) 1983 History of Architecture and Urban Development Program M.A. Thesis, "The United States Capitol Grounds: Preservation of an Olmsted Landscape" B.S. Landscape Architecture, University of Virginia 1978 Academic Experience Merrill D. Peterson Professor of Landscape Architecture, University of Virginia School of Architecture, 2014- Dean, University of Virginia School of Architecture & Edward E. Elson Professor, 2014-2016 Professor, University of Virginia School of Architecture, 2013- Associate Professor, University of Virginia School of Architecture, 1993-2013 Landscape Architecture Program Director, January 2006-January 2007 Department Chair, Landscape Architecture January1993 - August1998, January 2002-August 2003 Associate Professor, Harvard University Graduate School of Design, August1992 - Assistant Professor, Harvard University Graduate School of Design, 1988-1992 Visiting Lecturer, University of Virginia School of Architecture, Spring 1987, Fall 1985 Visiting Studio Critic, Harvard University Graduate School of Design, Fall 1986 Instructor, George Washington University Landscape Design program, Winter 1984, 1983 Visiting Instructor, Cornell University College of Architecture, Art and Planning, 1982-1983 Professional Practice Experience Historic Landscape architectural consultant, City+Arch+River. Reframing a Masterpiece Design Competition and Wellesley College Landscape Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Committee Board of Trustees American Society of Landscape Architects 636 Eye Street NW Washington, DC 20001-3736
    Reed Hilderbrand LLC Landscape Architecture Executive Committee Board of Trustees American Society of Landscape Architects 636 Eye Street NW Washington, DC 20001-3736 Re: Letter of Nomination for the ASLA Design Medal: Peter Walker REED| HILDERBRAND Dear Executive Committee Members: I am honored to present the nomination for Peter Walker, Principal of Peter Walker and Partners Landscape Architecture, for the ASLA Design Medal. It is my personal view that there is no living landscape architect with a more widely recognized body of work. As a writer and critic, I have worked closely with Pete and have benefitted from his encouragement, guidance, and generosity. As a teacher, I have taught by his example, and I continue to utilize ample references from his built works and body of publications. Perhaps for these reasons I cannot claim complete objectivity in this nomination—but who among us can? We have all benefitted from his example and his effort to make landscape architecture known to the world. My career would have been markedly different without exposure to Pete’s shared wisdom and his works. I think that’s true for many of us, as some notable colleagues will attest. I would like to cite a few key remarks from letters written in support of this nomination. Several of the writers indicated surprise that this honor had not already been bestowed upon Pete. Although he was awarded our society’s highest honor, the ASLA Medal (2004), and has also received IFLA’s Sir Geoffrey Jellicoe Gold Medal (2005) for lifetime achievement, the Honor Award of the American Institute of Architects (1992), Harvard’s Centennial Medal (2004), and the University of Virginia’s Thomas Jefferson Medal (2004), he has not been recognized with the ASLA Design Medal.
    [Show full text]
  • Competition Brief Stage 3
    Competition brief PRESENTED BY: stage 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 Invitation to Compete 4 Overview 7 Aims and Objectives 9 Project Management Team 10 Competition Process 14 Background Information 16 Submission Requirements 20 Selection 23 General Instructions 27 Terms and Conditions 28 Roles and Responsibilities APPENDICES 31 DIA Exhibition Space Site Plan 35 Steering Committee Members 36 Jury Member Bios 40 Student Design Summit INVITATION TO COMPETE The Detroit Institute of Arts + Midtown Detroit Inc. (DIA + MDI) are pleased to invite you to participate in the competition Stage 3 for the DIA Plaza | Midtown Cultural Connections project. This competition is among the most significant in Detroit in recent decades and has drawn interest internationally from leading landscape architects and design professionals. After receiving forty-four responses to the request for qualifications and shortlisting eight teams for interviews in Detroit, three teams have been selected as finalists to advance to the Competition round: Agence Ter, Paris, France. Team partners: Akoaki, Detroit; Harley Etienne, University of Michigan; rootoftwo; University of Michigan and Detroit; and Transsolar | KlimaEngineering, Germany. Mikyoung Kim Design, Boston. Team partners: James Carpenter Design Associates, New York; CDAD, Detroit; Wkshps, New York; Quinn Evans Architects, Detroit; Giffels Webster, Detroit; Tillett Lighting Design Associates, New York; Cuseum, Boston; Transsolar | KlimaEngineering, Germany; and Schlaich Bergermann & Partners, New York. TEN x TEN, Minneapolis. Team partners: MASS Design Group, New York; D MET, Detroit; Atelier Ten, London; Local Projects, Boston; HR&A Advisors, New York; and Dr. Craig Wilkins, University of Michigan. 3 OVERVIEW Congratulations for being selected as a finalist in the DIA + Midtown Cultural Connections design competition! Thank you for your continued interest in moving this important project forward.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Catalog Fall 2018
    Urban Research BOOK CATALOG FALL 2018 urpub.org UR (Urban Research), the imprint of Terreform, publishes progressive books about cities and their futures. Understanding that no single approach is adequate to the promise and problems of the urban, we publish a wide range of designs and analyses. Our list includes projects ranging from the practical to the utopian, from community-generated plans for neighborhood transformation to outstanding outcomes from academic studios, to visionary speculations by designers burning the midnight oil, and to collations of scholarly arguments about the most urgent issues of urban growth and survival. Michael Sorkin Editor in Chief Advisory Board Tom Angotti, Hunter College CUNY Thom Mayne, Morphosis Architects Kazi Ashraf, Bengal Institute Suha Ozkan, World Architecture Community M. Christine Boyer, Princeton University Colin Robinson, OR Books Teddy Cruz, Estudio Teddy Cruz Jonathan Solomon, School of the Art Institute Mike Davis, UC Riverside of Chicago Edward Dimendberg, UC Irvine Tau Tavengwa, African Center for Cities Ana Maria Duran Calisto, Estudio AO Srdjan Weiss, Normal Architecture Office Anthony Fontenot, Woodbury School of Eyal Weizman, Goldsmiths College Architecture Mabel O. Wilson, Columbia GSAPP Susanna Hecht, UCLA Kongjian Yu, Peking University John Hill, New York Institute of Technology Walter Hood, UC Berkeley Cindi Katz, Graduate Center CUNY Romi Khosla, Romi Khosla Design Studio UR (Urban Research) urpub.org 2 UR01 GOWNTOWN: A 197X PLAN FOR UPPER MANHATTAN UPPER PLANFOR 197X A GOWNTOWN: Gowntown investigates the impact of Columbia University’s expansion into Upper Manhattan and proposes strategies of transformative leverage provide GOWNTOWNbroad and focused benefit and counter an urbanism of trickle-down and gentrification.Gowntown proposes a planning paradigm focused on both carefully designed and spontaneous institutional and environmental A 197-Xconnections.
    [Show full text]
  • Education Academic Experience Honors
    david hill ASLA, LEED AP Founding Principal, HILLWORKS + Assistant Professor, Graduate Landscape Architecture Program, Auburn University College of Architecture, Design+Construction | 412 Dudley Hall, Auburn, Alabama 36849 | 334.844.5434 | [email protected] education University of Virginia School of Architecture, Master of Landscape Architecture, 2005 University of Virginia School of Architecture, Master of Architecture, 2005 Georgia Institute of Technology, Bachelor of Science in Architecture, 2000 academic experience Auburn University, College of Architecture, Design + Construction, Graduate Landscape Architecture Program Assistant Professor, fall 2009 to summer 2015 Associate Professor, fall 2015 to present University of Virginia School of Architecture, Department of Architecture and Landscape Architecture Adjunct Lecturer, Architectural Design Studio, Arch 201, fall 2005 + fall 2006 Adjunct Lecturer, AutoCAD graduate workshop, spring + fall 2006 honors select teaching awards: Outstanding Teaching Award, Auburn, School of Architecture, Planning + Landscape Architecture, 2012 Outstanding Faculty Award, Auburn University Student Government Association, 2010 TransAtlantic Climate Bridge Competition, Auburn University Office of International Education and the Embassy of the Federal Republic of Germany, 2010 OnePrize Award semi-finalist, Terreform 1, “Mowing to Growing: Reinventing the American Lawn” competition, 2010 select professional/research awards: Award of Honor in Research, National ASLA: the Phenology Project, 2014 Award of Honor
    [Show full text]
  • Virginia Energy Plan
    Chapter 1 Chapter 5 Table of 1.0 Introduction ..................................1 5.0 Energy and the Environment ....102 Contents 1.1 Executive Summary ........................2 5.1 Impacts of Energy Use on Air Recommendations..........................9 Quality ........................................102 1.2 Conclusions..................................29 5.2 Impacts of Energy Use on Water Quality and Water Supplies........104 Chapter 2 5.3 Land Use and Energy Consumption..............................105 2.0 Virginia Energy Resources 5.4 Impacts of Energy Use on and Consumption ........................30 Climate Change ..........................107 2.1 Energy Production........................30 5.5 Environmental Case for 2.2 Energy Imports and Exports ........37 Energy Efficiency and 2.3 Energy Consumption ..................43 Renewable Energy ......................109 2.4 Energy Production and 5.6 Incentives for Renewable Consumption Forecasts................47 Energy ........................................110 2.5 Impact of Utility Regulation 5.7 Carbon Capture and Storage ....111 and Restructuring ........................49 5.8 Environmental Programs 2.6 Role of New Technologies............49 Affecting Energy Use ..................112 2.7 Opportunities and Challenges ....56 Chapter 6 Chapter 3 6.0 Energy Research and 3.0 Energy Efficiency and Development ..............................116 Conservation ................................58 6.1 Energy R&D at Virginia Colleges 3.1 Improving Energy Efficiency and Universities..........................117
    [Show full text]
  • Groundswell : [Brochure] Constructing the Contemporary Landscape
    Groundswell : [brochure] constructing the contemporary landscape Date 2005 Publisher The Museum of Modern Art Exhibition URL www.moma.org/calendar/exhibitions/117 The Museum of Modern Art's exhibition history— from our founding in 1929 to the present—is available online. It includes exhibition catalogues, primary documents, installation views, and an index of participating artists. MoMA © 2017 The Museum of Modern Art Constructing the Contemporary Landsc ^jrw| Exchange Square, Manchester, England 1998-2000 We need to grasp the truth that our landscape is a built artifact and, as such, must be designed, and therefore is an opportunity and an appropriate place for the expression of personal aesthetics and ideas. The visual quality of our environment defines us as individuals and citizens of a certain place. It becomes internalized and part of our self-image. It defines who we are individually and collectively and ultimately becomes what we are remembered by as a culture. My definition of landscape is not limited to our natural environment, or to just parks, waterfronts, and plazas, but more importantly focuses on the landscapes we are building for ourselves in which we work, live, shop, commute, and generally exist. In spite of my reputation as a nature-hater, I am simply misunderstood. I am protesting this disjuncture between word and deed as it concerns nature and interferes with our ability to create positive environments for both man and beast. — Martha Schwartz Martha Schwartz, Martha Schwartz, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts Competition drawing with artificial palm trees. Image: Michael Blier Schouwburgplein (Theater Square), Rotterdam, the Netherlands 1991-96 Adriaan Geuze, West 8 urban design & landscape architecture bv, Rotterdam, the Netherlands Modern-day citizens can use landscape and nature as one way of defining their place in the world.
    [Show full text]