ObservationOkajimas of maxillary Folia Anat. incisive Jpn., canal92(2): in 37–42, childhood Aug, 201537

(Original)

Observation of maxillary incisive using dry between Hellman’s dental age IA and IIIC

By

Munetaka NAITOH1, Tomoko ARIKAWA2, Wataru NISHIYAMA1, Kenichi GOTOH3, Hiroyuki NAWA2, Osamu FUKUTA2, Eiichiro ARIJI1

1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Aichi-Gakuin University, Nagoya, Japan 2Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Aichi-Gakuin University, Nagoya, Japan 3Division of Radiology, Dental Hospital, Aichi-Gakuin University, Nagoya, Japan

–Received for Publication, June 29, 2015–

Key Words: Maxillary incisive canal, Cone-beam computed tomography, Dental age, Hellman’s classification

Summary: The maxillary incisive canals were observed in childhood from infancy to school-aged children to clarify their development. Cone-beam computed tomography was performed to investigate 44 dry child skulls. Two-dimensional images of various planes in the maxillary incisive canal were reconstructed on a computer using 3-dimensional visualization and measurement software. Then, antero-posterior angulation, and antero-posterior and lateral axes of the maxillary incisive canal were measured at the inferior and middle levels. The mean difference of angulation between the inferior and middle levels was 2.3 degrees in IIC, and 11.1 degrees in IIIC. The mean ratio of the lateral axis to antero-posterior axis at the middle level was 2.54 in IIC, and 1.93 in IIIC. In conclusion, it was antero-posteriorly straight from IA to IIC, and, after IIIA, it curved at the middle level. The cross-sectional shape in IIC was depressed with a larger lateral axis.

Introduction Materials and Methods

The location and configuration of the maxillary - inci Objectives sive canal are important in surgical procedures involving Forty-four dry child skulls were used in the investi- the anterior maxillary region, such as in dental implant gation. On classifying the dental age of each using treatment, extraction of a supernumerary mesiodens, and Hellman’s classification,10) one skull belonged to IA, 6 to cysteotomy of radicular and nasopalatine cysts.1–3) IC, 8 to IIA, 7 to IIC, 13 to IIIA, 3 to IIIB, and 6 to IIIC. The diameter and angulation to the palatal plane of the maxillary incisive canal in adults were reported in Cone-beam CT previous studies using spiral and cone-beam computed Cone-beam CT employing Alphard VEGA (Asahi tomography (CT).4–6) However, development of the Roentgen Ind., Kyoto, Japan) was performed to investi- maxillary incisive canal in childhood was not evaluated. gate 44 dry child skulls. The exposure volume was set at The spatial resolution of cone-beam CT is high in 102 mm in diameter and 60 mm in height, and the voxel comparison with multislice CT, and fine anatomical struc- size was 0.2 x 0.2 x 0.2 mm. The DICOM files of axial tures can be clearly observed using it.7–9) images were saved to a portable hard disk (HD). In the present investigation, maxillary incisive canals were observed using cone-beam CT and dry skulls in Assessment of maxillary incisive canal childhood from infancy to school-aged children to clarify Two-dimensional (2-D) cone-beam CT images of their development. various planes in the maxillary incisive canal were recon- structed on a computer (Mac Book Pro Retina, Apple Computer Inc., Cupertino, CA, USA) using 3-dimen- sional (3-D) visualization and measurement software

Corresponding author: Munetaka Naitoh, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Aichi-Gakuin University, 2-11, Suemori-dori, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8651, Japan. E-mail: 38 M. Naitoh et al.

Fig. 2. Measurements of angulation of the maxillary incisive canal. a: Angulation at the inferior level, b: Angulation at the middle level.

Fig. 3. Measurements of anterior-posterior and lateral axes of the max- illary incisive canal. a: Antero-posterior axis, b: Lateral axis

Fig. 1. 2-D cone-beam CT images. A. Sagittal image. B. Axial image paralleling the palatal plane at the inferior level. C. Axial image between the most inferior point of the posterior edge of paralleling the palatal plane at the middle level. the maxillary incisive canal and nasal floor. The differ- ence of angulation between the inferior and middle levels was calculated. (OsiriX, Imaging Software; The OsiriX Foundation, Axial images paralleling the palatal plane were recon- Geneva, Switzerland11)) (Fig. 1). structed and antero-posterior (a) and lateral (b) axes of Then, the antero-posterior angulation of the maxillary the maxillary incisive canal were measured supero-inferi- incisive canal to the palatal plane based on anterior and orly at the two levels (Fig. 3). The ratio of the lateral axis posterior nasal spines was measured supero-inferiorly to antero-posterior axis (ratio = lateral axis/ antero-poste- at two levels: inferior and middle levels, using sagittal rior axis) was calculated. The maxillary incisive canal of images (Fig. 2). The inferior level was set at the most one dry skull in IIIA could not be detected at the middle inferior point of the posterior edge of the maxillary inci- level. sive canal. The middle level was set at the middle point One of the authors (M.N.) with experience of 32 Observation of maxillary incisive canal in childhood 39

Fig. 4. The angulation of the maxillary incisive canal years in oral and maxillofacial radiology performed each Table 1. The differences of angulation between the inferior and middle measurement five times and then repeated them in the levels. same way after approximately one month. The measure- Hellman’s dental age Range Mean SD Median ments were averaged. IA 0.7 0.7 IC 0.2 – 18.4 7.2 7.4 5.3 Statistical analysis IIA –5.0 – 12.3 4.1 6.6 2.1 The differences among stages of Hellman’s dental IIC –4.6 – 5.7 2.3 3.6 3.6 age with different angulations between the inferior and IIIA 0.0 – 19.2 9.5 5.5 9.8 middle levels, and the ratio of the lateral axis to ante- IIIB 7.1 – 10.8 9.0 1.9 9.2 IIIC 6.1 – 21.4 11.1 6.1 8.7 ro-posterior axis of the maxillary incisive canal were evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U test. Differences Unit: Degrees were considered significant with P-values of less than Significant difference: Between IIC and IIIA, between IIC and IIIB, between IIC and IIIC 0.05.

Results IIC and IIIC.

Antero-posterior angulation of the maxillary incisive The antero-posterior and lateral axes, and ratio of axes canal of the maxillary incisive canal The mean and SD of angulation based on Hellman’s The mean and SD of axes based on Hellman’s dental dental age are shown in Fig. 4. The mean at the inferior age are shown in Figs. 5 and 6. level was 83.0 degrees in IC, and 75.3 degrees in IIIC. The mean antero-posterior axis at the inferior level The values decreased with progression of the stage of was 1.8 mm in IC, and 2.2 mm in IIIC. The values Hellman’s dental age. The mean at the middle level was slightly increased with progression of the stage of Hell- 75.8 degrees in IC, and 64.2 degrees in IIIC. The values man’s dental age. The mean lateral axis at the infe- decreased with stage progression of Hellman’s dental age. rior level was 2.6 mm in IIC. The value was higher in The differences of angulation between the inferior and comparison with that of IIIC. The ratio of the lateral axis middle levels are shown in Table 1. The mean difference to antero-posterior axis at the inferior level is shown in was 2.3 degrees in IIC, and 11.1 degrees in IIIC. Signifi- Table 2. The range of ratio of the lateral axis to ante- cant differences with different of angulations were noted ro-posterior was from 0.82 to 2.38 in IIC, and the mean between IIC and IIIA, between IIC and IIIB, and between was 1.48. The value was higher in comparison with those 40 M. Naitoh et al.

Fig. 5. The antero-posterior and lateral axes of the maxillary incisive canal at the inferior level

Fig. 6. The antero-posterior and lateral axes of the maxillary incisive canal at the middle level

of the other stages. The differences regarding the ratio of dental age. The mean lateral axis at the middle level was the lateral axis to antero-posterior axis were not signifi- 2.5 mm in IIC. The value was higher in comparison with cant among Hellman’s dental age. that of IIIC. The ratio of the lateral axis to antero-pos- The mean antero-posterior axis at the middle level terior axis at the middle level is shown in Table 3. The was 1.2 mm in IIA, and 1.3 mm in IIIC. The values were range of the ratio was from 1.00 to 5.86 in IIC, and the similar among IIA, IIC, IIIA, and IIIC of Hellman’s mean was 2.54. The value was higher in comparison Observation of maxillary incisive canal in childhood 41

Table 2. The ratio of the lateral axis to antero-posterior axis at the in- Table 3. The ratio of the lateral axis to antero-posterior axis at the mid- ferior level. dle level.

Hellman’s dental age Range Mean SD Median Hellman’s dental age Range Mean SD Median IA 0.78 0.78 IA 1.88 1.88 IC 0.75 – 1.33 1.14 0.48 0.96 IC 0.65 – 5.00 1.83 1.62 1.51 IIA 0.63 – 2.15 1.22 0.63 0.94 IIA 0.61 – 3.80 1.80 1.18 1.28 IIC 0.82 – 2.38 1.48 0.59 1.35 IIC 1.00 – 5.86 2.54 1.83 1.71 IIIA 0.36 – 2.71 1.17 0.61 1.11 IIIA 0.67 – 2.60 1.48 0.66 1.52 IIIB 0.82 – 1.09 1.00 0.15 1.08 IIIB 1.00 – 1.86 1.54 0.47 1.77 IIIC 0.59 – 1.81 1.18 0.46 1.14 IIIC 0.92 – 5.20 1.93 1.66 1.38 Significant difference: None Significant difference: None

with those of the other stages (Fig. 7). The differences regarding the ratio of the lateral axis to antero-posterior axis were not significant among Hellman’s dental age.

Discussion

In the present investigation, maxillary incisive canals were observed in childhood to clarify their development. The occurrence, configuration, and size in various anatomical structures, such as the bifid mandibular canals, accessory , and septa in the maxil- lary sinus, were compared between childhood and adult- hood in previous studies.12, 13) Forty-four child skulls were used in the present study; however, skulls showing IA and IIIB of Hellman’s dental age were limited. Fig. 7. Axial image of the maxillary incisive canal at the middle level. Cone-beam CT was used for the observation of The cross-sectional shape of the maxillary incisive canal (ar- 7–9) various fine anatomical structures, and the angulation, row), in which the dry skull belonged to IIC of Hellman’s dental and diameter of the maxillary incisive canal in adults age, was depressed with a larger lateral axis. The ratio of the were measured using it in previous studies.4, 5) lateral axis/antero-posterior axis was 3.13. The mean antero-posterior angulation at the inferior level was 75.3 degrees in IIIC, and the value was close to that of adults (mean: 74.3 degrees) in a previous study.4) adults with dentate were 3.8 mm and 3.7 mm at the infe- The mean difference of angulation between the infe- rior level, and 2.8 mm and 3.3 mm, respectively. The rior and middle levels was lower in IIA and IIC, and it ratio of lateral axis to antero-posterior axis simply calcu- was understood that the maxillary incisive canal was lated was 0.97 at the inferior level, and 1.18 at the middle straight from the inferior level to nasal floor. Signifi- level. The cross-sectional shape of the maxillary incisive cant differences with different of angulations were noted canal at the inferior and middle levels was similar to the between IIC and after IIIA. Development of the round shape. The IIIC rate between antero-posterior and surrounding the maxillary incisive canal after IIIA might lateral axes at the inferior level was close to 1, and the be related to it. The stage of IIIA in Hellman’s dental age shape was similarly round. The mean ratio of the lateral corresponded to the time of eruption of maxillary inci- axis to antero-posterior axis at the inferior and middle sors. levels of IIC was higher in comparison with those of the Toezuem TF et al.6) reported that the mean ante- other stages. The cross-sectional shape of the maxillary ro-posterior axis of the maxillary incisor canal at infe- incisive canal was depressed. The stage of IIC in Hell- rior, middle, and nasal floor levels was 2.90, 2.08, and man’s dental age corresponded to the beginning time 2.77 mm, respectively. The difference in the antero-pos- of eruption of the maxillary incisors. The formation of terior axis between childhood and adulthood was 0.7 central maxillary incisors, being close to the maxillary mm at the inferior level and 0.8 mm at middle level. It incisor canal, might be related to it. was suggested that the increase of the antero-posterior Sperber et al.14) described the formation of the maxil- axis continued in stages after IIIC. Also, Asaumi et al.4) lary incisive canal. During the 8th week post-conception, reported that mean antero-posterior and lateral axes in a marked transformation in the position of the lateral 42 M. Naitoh et al. shelves takes place, when they alter from vertical to hori- 18:473–479. zontal, as a prelude to their fusion and partitioning of the 3) Raghoebar GM, den Hrtog L, VissinkA: Augmentation in prox- imal to the to allow placement endosseous oronasal chamber. Fusion of the three palatal compo- implants: a case series. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 68:2267– nents, which are composed of the two lateral maxillary 2271. palatal shelves and the primary palate of the frontnasal 4) Asaumi R, Kawai T, Sato I, Yoshida S, Yosue T: Three-dimen- prominence, initially produces a flat, unarched roof to the sional observations of the incisive canal and the surrounding mouth. The fusing lateral palatal shelves overlap with the using cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Radiol 2010; 26:20–28. anterior primary palate, as indicated later by the sloping 5) Bonstein MM, Balsiger R, Sendi P, von Arx T: Morphology of pathways of the junctional incisive neurovascular canals the nasopalatine canal and dental implant surgery: a radiographic that carry the previously formed incisive nerves and analysis of 100 consecutive patients using limited cone-beam blood vessels. Ossification of the palate proceeds during computed tomography. Clin Oral Impl Res 2011; 22:295–301. the 8th week post-conception derived from single primary 6) Toezuem TF, Guencue GN, Yildirim YD, Yilmaz HG, Galin- do-Moreno P, Velasco-Torres M, Al-Hezaimi K, Al-Sadhan R, ossification centers of the maxillae. Karabulut E, Wang H-L: Evaluation of maxillary incisive canal 15) Also, Song et al. reported, based on histologic find- characteristics related to dental implant treatment with computer- ings, that numerous veins were observed in the maxil- ized tomography: clinical multicenter study. J Periodontol 2012; lary incisive canal, and the number of arteries appeared 83:337–343. to be correlated with the number of channels present. In 7) Naitoh M, Hiraiwa Y, Aimiya H, Ariji E: observation of bifid using cone-beam computed tomography. Int J contrast, the nerve or its branches were located mainly Oral Maxillofac implants 2009; 24:155–159. in the central channel or in the most central of the lateral 8) Naitoh M, Hiraiwa Y, Aimiya H, Gotoh K, Ariji E: Accessory channels. mental foramen assessment using cone-beam computed tomog- It was clarified that the configuration and angulation raphy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; of the maxillary incisive canal in childhood differed from 107:289–294. 9) Naitoh M, Nakahara K, Suenaga Y, Gotoh K, Kondo S, Ariji E: those in adulthood. Careful observation of it was needed Variations of the bony canal in the mandibular ramus using cone- in preoperative imaging when extraction of a supernu- beam computed tomography. Oral Radiol 2010; 26:36–40. merary mesiodens and cystectomy of radicular and naso- 10) Hellman A: An introduction to growth of human from infancy palatine cysts were performed in a child. to adulthood. Int J Orthod Oral Surg and Radiogr 1932; 18:777– 798. 11) Rosset A, Spadola L, Ratib O: OsiriX: an open-source software for navigating in multidimensional DICOM images. J Digit Imag Conclusion 2004; 17:205–216. 12) Naitoh M, Suenaga Y, Gotoh K, Ito M, Kondo S, Ariji E: Obser- The maxillary incisive canal was antero-posteriorly vation of septa and bony bridges using dry skulls straight from IA to IIC, and, after IIIA it curved at the between Hellman’s dental age of IA and IIIC. Okajima Folia Anat Jpn 2010; 87:41–47. middle level. The cross-sectional shape of the maxillary 13) Orhan AI, Orhan K, Aksoy S, Ozgeul O, Horasan S, Arsian A, incisive canal in IIC was depressed with a larger lateral Kocyigit D: Evaluation of perimandibular neurovasculariza- axis. tion with accessory mental foramina using cone-beam computed tomography in children. J Craniofac Surg 2013; 24:e365–e369. 14) Sperber GH, Sperber SM, Guttmann GD: Palate. In: Craniofacial Embryogenetics and Development. 2nd ed. Shelton, CT, People’s References Medical Publishing House-USA, 2010; 131–144. 15) Song W-C, Jo D-I, Lee J-Y, Kim J-N, Hur M-S, Hu K-S, Kim 1) Kraut RA, Boyden DK: Location of incisive canal in relation to H-J, Shin C, Koh K-S: Microanatomy of the incisive canal using central incisive implants. Implant Dent 1998; 7:221–223. three-dimensional reconstruction of microCT images: An ex vivo 2) Spin-Neto R, Bedran TBL, de Paula WN, de Freitas RM, de study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; Oliveira Ramalho LT, Marcantonio Jr E: Incisive canal deflation 108:583–590. for correct implant placement: case report. Implant Dent 2009;