Practical Application of Anatomy for the Dental Implants
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Numb Tongue, Numb Lip, Numb Chin: What to Do When?
NUMB TONGUE, NUMB LIP, NUMB CHIN: WHAT TO DO WHEN? Ramzey Tursun, DDS, FACS Marshall Green, DDS Andre Ledoux, DMD Arshad Kaleem, DMD, MD Assistant Professor, Associate Fellowship Director of Oral, Head & Neck Oncologic and Microvascular Reconstructive Surgery, DeWitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, Division of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami INTRODUCTION MECHANISM OF NERVE Microneurosurgery of the trigeminal nerve INJURIES has been in the spotlight over the last few years. The introduction of cone-beam When attempting to classify the various scanning, three-dimensional imaging, mechanisms of nerve injury in the magnetic resonance neurography, maxillofacial region, it becomes clear that endoscopic-assisted surgery, and use of the overwhelming majority are iatrogenic allogenic nerve grafts have improved the in nature. The nerves that are most often techniques that can be used for affected in dento-alveolar procedures are assessment and treatment of patients with the branches of the mandibular division of nerve injuries. Injury to the terminal cranial nerve V, i.e., the trigeminal nerve. branches of the trigeminal nerve is a well- The lingual nerve and inferior alveolar known risk associated with a wide range of nerve are most often affected, and third dental and surgical procedures. These molar surgery is the most common cause 1 injuries often heal spontaneously without of injury. medical or surgical intervention. However, they sometimes can cause a variety of None of these nerves provide motor symptoms, including lost or altered innervation. However, damage to these sensation, pain, or a combination of these, nerves can cause a significant loss of and may have an impact on speech, sensation and/or taste in affected patients. -
Palatal Injection Does Not Block the Superior Alveolar Nerve Trunks: Correcting an Error Regarding the Innervation of the Maxillary Teeth
Open Access Review Article DOI: 10.7759/cureus.2120 Palatal Injection does not Block the Superior Alveolar Nerve Trunks: Correcting an Error Regarding the Innervation of the Maxillary Teeth Joe Iwanaga 1 , R. Shane Tubbs 2 1. Seattle Science Foundation 2. Neurosurgery, Seattle Science Foundation Corresponding author: Joe Iwanaga, [email protected] Abstract The superior alveolar nerves course lateral to the maxillary sinus and the greater palatine nerve travels through the hard palate. This difficult three-dimensional anatomy has led some dentists and oral surgeons to a critical misunderstanding in developing the anterior and middle superior alveolar (AMSA) nerve block and the palatal approach anterior superior alveolar (P-ASA) nerve block. In this review, the anatomy of the posterior, middle and anterior superior alveolar nerves, greater palatine nerve, and nasopalatine nerve are revisited in order to clarify the anatomy of these blocks so that the perpetuated anatomical misunderstanding is rectified. We conclude that the AMSA and P-ASA nerve blockades, as currently described, are not based on accurate anatomy. Categories: Anesthesiology, Medical Education, Other Keywords: anatomy, innervation, local anesthesia, maxillary nerve, nerve block, tooth Introduction And Background Anesthetic blockade of the posterior superior alveolar (PSA) branch of the maxillary nerve has played an important role in the endodontic treatment of irreversible acute pulpitis of the upper molar teeth except for the mesiobuccal root of the first molar tooth [1, 2]. This procedure requires precise anatomical knowledge of the pterygopalatine fossa and related structures in order to avoid unnecessary complications and to make the blockade most effective. The infraorbital nerve gives rise to middle superior alveolar (MSA) and anterior superior alveolar (ASA) branches. -
Anatomical Characteristics and Visibility of Mental Foramen and Accessory Mental Foramen: Panoramic Radiography Vs
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2015 Nov 1;20 (6):e707-14. Radiographic study of the mental foramen variations Journal section: Oral Surgery doi:10.4317/medoral.20585 Publication Types: Research http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/medoral.20585 Anatomical characteristics and visibility of mental foramen and accessory mental foramen: Panoramic radiography vs. cone beam CT Juan Muinelo-Lorenzo 1, Juan-Antonio Suárez-Quintanilla 2, Ana Fernández-Alonso 1, Jesús Varela-Mallou 3, María-Mercedes Suárez-Cunqueiro 4 1 PhD Student, Department of Stomatology, Medicine and Dentistry School, University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain 2 Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, Medicine and Dentistry School, University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain 3 Professor and Chairman. Department of Social Psychology, Basic Psychology and Methodology, Psychology School, University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain 4 Associate Professor, Department of Stomatology, Medicine and Dentistry School, University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain Correspondence: Stomatology Department Medicine and Dentistry School University of Santiago de Compostela C/ Entrerrios S/N 15872 Muinelo-Lorenzo J, Suárez-Quintanilla JA, Fernández-Alonso A, Va- Santiago de Compostela, Spain rela-Mallou J, Suárez-Cunqueiro MM. Anatomical characteristics and [email protected] visibility of mental foramen and accessory mental foramen: Panoramic radiography vs. cone beam CT. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2015 Nov 1;20 (6):e707-14. http://www.medicinaoral.com/medoralfree01/v20i6/medoralv20i6p707.pdf Received: 05/01/2015 Accepted: 05/05/2015 Article Number: 20585 http://www.medicinaoral.com/ © Medicina Oral S. L. C.I.F. B 96689336 - pISSN 1698-4447 - eISSN: 1698-6946 eMail: [email protected] Indexed in: Science Citation Index Expanded Journal Citation Reports Index Medicus, MEDLINE, PubMed Scopus, Embase and Emcare Indice Médico Español Abstract Background. -
Anatomy of Maxillary and Mandibular Local Anesthesia
Anatomy of Mandibular and Maxillary Local Anesthesia Patricia L. Blanton, Ph.D., D.D.S. Professor Emeritus, Department of Anatomy, Baylor College of Dentistry – TAMUS and Private Practice in Periodontics Dallas, Texas Anatomy of Mandibular and Maxillary Local Anesthesia I. Introduction A. The anatomical basis of local anesthesia 1. Infiltration anesthesia 2. Block or trunk anesthesia II. Review of the Trigeminal Nerve (Cranial n. V) – the major sensory nerve of the head A. Ophthalmic Division 1. Course a. Superior orbital fissure – root of orbit – supraorbital foramen 2. Branches – sensory B. Maxillary Division 1. Course a. Foramen rotundum – pterygopalatine fossa – inferior orbital fissure – floor of orbit – infraorbital 2. Branches - sensory a. Zygomatic nerve b. Pterygopalatine nerves [nasal (nasopalatine), orbital, palatal (greater and lesser palatine), pharyngeal] c. Posterior superior alveolar nerves d. Infraorbital nerve (middle superior alveolar nerve, anterior superior nerve) C. Mandibular Division 1. Course a. Foramen ovale – infratemporal fossa – mandibular foramen, Canal -> mental foramen 2. Branches a. Sensory (1) Long buccal nerve (2) Lingual nerve (3) Inferior alveolar nerve -> mental nerve (4) Auriculotemporal nerve b. Motor (1) Pterygoid nerves (2) Temporal nerves (3) Masseteric nerves (4) Nerve to tensor tympani (5) Nerve to tensor veli palatine (6) Nerve to mylohyoid (7) Nerve to anterior belly of digastric c. Both motor and sensory (1) Mylohyoid nerve III. Usual Routes of innervation A. Maxilla 1. Teeth a. Molars – Posterior superior alveolar nerve b. Premolars – Middle superior alveolar nerve c. Incisors and cuspids – Anterior superior alveolar nerve 2. Gingiva a. Facial/buccal – Superior alveolar nerves b. Palatal – Anterior – Nasopalatine nerve; Posterior – Greater palatine nerves B. -
Is the Skeleton Male Or Female? the Pelvis Tells the Story
Activity: Is the Skeleton Male or Female? The pelvis tells the story. Distinct features adapted for childbearing distinguish adult females from males. Other bones and the skull also have features that can indicate sex, though less reliably. In young children, these sex-related features are less obvious and more difficult to interpret. Subtle sex differences are detectable in younger skeletons, but they become more defined following puberty and sexual maturation. What are the differences? Compare the two illustrations below in Figure 1. Female Pelvic Bones Male Pelvic Bones Broader sciatic notch Narrower sciatic notch Raised auricular surface Flat auricular surface Figure 1. Female and male pelvic bones. (Source: Smithsonian Institution, illustrated by Diana Marques) Figure 2. Pelvic bone of the skeleton in the cellar. (Source: Smithsonian Institution) Skull (Cranium and Mandible) Male Skulls Generally larger than female Larger projections behind the Larger brow ridges, with sloping, ears (mastoid processes) less rounded forehead Square chin with a more vertical Greater definition of muscle (acute) angle of the jaw attachment areas on the back of the head Figure 3. Male skulls. (Source: Smithsonian Institution, illustrated by Diana Marques) Female Skulls Smoother bone surfaces where Smaller projections behind the muscles attach ears (mastoid processes) Less pronounced brow ridges, Chin more pointed, with a larger, with more vertical forehead obtuse angle of the jaw Sharp upper margins of the eye orbits Figure 4. Female skulls. (Source: Smithsonian Institution, illustrated by Diana Marques) What Do You Think? Comparing the skull from the cellar in Figure 5 (below) with the illustrated male and female skulls in Figures 3 and 4, write Male or Female to note the sex depicted by each feature. -
The Cat Mandible (II): Manipulation of the Jaw, with a New Prosthesis Proposal, to Avoid Iatrogenic Complications
animals Review The Cat Mandible (II): Manipulation of the Jaw, with a New Prosthesis Proposal, to Avoid Iatrogenic Complications Matilde Lombardero 1,*,† , Mario López-Lombardero 2,†, Diana Alonso-Peñarando 3,4 and María del Mar Yllera 1 1 Unit of Veterinary Anatomy and Embryology, Department of Anatomy, Animal Production and Clinical Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, Campus of Lugo—University of Santiago de Compostela, 27002 Lugo, Spain; [email protected] 2 Engineering Polytechnic School of Gijón, University of Oviedo, 33203 Gijón, Spain; [email protected] 3 Department of Animal Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, Campus of Lugo—University of Santiago de Compostela, 27002 Lugo, Spain; [email protected] 4 Veterinary Clinic Villaluenga, calle Centro n◦ 2, Villaluenga de la Sagra, 45520 Toledo, Spain * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +34-982-822-333 † Both authors contributed equally to this manuscript. Simple Summary: The small size of the feline mandible makes its manipulation difficult when fixing dislocations of the temporomandibular joint or mandibular fractures. In both cases, non-invasive techniques should be considered first. When not possible, fracture repair with internal fixation using bone plates would be the best option. Simple jaw fractures should be repaired first, and caudal to rostral. In addition, a ventral approach makes the bone fragments exposure and its manipulation easier. However, the cat mandible has little space to safely place the bone plate screws without damaging the tooth roots and/or the mandibular blood and nervous supply. As a consequence, we propose a conceptual model of a mandibular prosthesis that would provide biomechanical Citation: Lombardero, M.; stabilization, avoiding any unintended (iatrogenic) damage to those structures. -
Inferior Alveolar Nerve Trajectory, Mental Foramen Location and Incidence of Mental Nerve Anterior Loop
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2017 Sep 1;22 (5):e630-5. CBCT anatomy of the inferior alveolar nerve Journal section: Oral Surgery doi:10.4317/medoral.21905 Publication Types: Research http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/medoral.21905 Inferior alveolar nerve trajectory, mental foramen location and incidence of mental nerve anterior loop Miguel Velasco-Torres 1, Miguel Padial-Molina 1, Gustavo Avila-Ortiz 2, Raúl García-Delgado 3, Andrés Ca- tena 4, Pablo Galindo-Moreno 1 1 DDS, PhD, Department of Oral Surgery and Implant Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Granada, Granada, Spain 2 DDS, MS, PhD, Department of Periodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA 3 Specialist in Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology. Private Practice. Granada, Spain 4 PhD, Department of Experimental Psychology, School of Psychology, University of Granada, Granada, Spain Correspondence: School of Dentistry, University of Granada 18071 - Granada, Spain [email protected] Velasco-Torres M, Padial-Molina M, Avila-Ortiz G, García-Delgado R, Catena A, Galindo-Moreno P. Inferior alveolar nerve trajectory, mental foramen location and incidence of mental nerve anterior loop. Med Oral Received: 07/03/2017 Accepted: 21/06/2017 Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2017 Sep 1;22 (5):e630-5. http://www.medicinaoral.com/medoralfree01/v22i5/medoralv22i5p630.pdf Article Number: 21905 http://www.medicinaoral.com/ © Medicina Oral S. L. C.I.F. B 96689336 - pISSN 1698-4447 - eISSN: 1698-6946 eMail: [email protected] Indexed in: Science Citation Index Expanded Journal Citation Reports Index Medicus, MEDLINE, PubMed Scopus, Embase and Emcare Indice Médico Español Abstract Background: Injury of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) is a serious intraoperative complication that may occur during routine surgical procedures, such as dental implant placement or extraction of impacted teeth. -
Assessment of Bone Channels Other Than the Nasopalatine Canal in the Anterior Maxilla Using Limited Cone Beam Computed Tomography
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Bern Open Repository and Information System (BORIS) Surg Radiol Anat (2013) 35:783–790 DOI 10.1007/s00276-013-1110-8 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Assessment of bone channels other than the nasopalatine canal in the anterior maxilla using limited cone beam computed tomography Thomas von Arx • Scott Lozanoff • Pedram Sendi • Michael M. Bornstein Received: 16 January 2013 / Accepted: 12 March 2013 / Published online: 29 March 2013 Ó Springer-Verlag France 2013 Abstract 1.31 ± 0.26 mm (range 1.01–2.13 mm). Gender and age Purpose The anterior maxilla, sometimes also called did not significantly influence the diameter. Accessory premaxilla, is an area frequently requiring surgical inter- canals were found palatal to all anterior teeth, but most ventions. The objective of this observational study was to frequently palatal to the central incisors. In 56.7 %, the identify and assess accessory bone channels other than the accessory canals curved superolaterally and communicated nasopalatine canal in the anterior maxilla using limited with the ipsilateral alveolar extension of the canalis cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). sinuosus. Methods A total of 176 cases fulfilled the inclusion cri- Conclusions The study confirms the presence of bone teria comprising region of interest, quality of CBCT image, channels within the anterior maxilla other than the naso- and absence of pathologic lesions or retained teeth. Any palatine canal. More than half of these accessory bone bone canal with a minimum diameter of 1.00 mm other canals communicated with the canalis sinuosus. -
Results Description of the SKULLS. the Overall Size of Both Skulls Was Considered to Be Within Normal Limits for Their Ethnic
Ossification Defects and Craniofacial Morphology In Incomplete Forms of Mandibulofacial Dysostosis A Description of Two Dry Skulls ERIK DAHL, D.D.S., DR. ODONT. ARNE BJORK, D.D.S., ODONT. DR. Copenhagen, Denmark The morphology of two East Indian dry skulls exhibiting anomalies which were suggested to represent incomplete forms of mandibulofacial dysostosis is described. Obvious although minor ossification anomalies were found localized to the temporal, sphenoid, the zygomatic, the maxillary and the mandibular bones. The observations substantiate the concept of the regional and bilateral nature of this malformation syndrome. Bilateral orbital deviations, hypoplasia of the malar bones, and incomplete zygomatic arches appear to be hard tissue aberrations which may be helpful in exami- nation for subclinical carrier status. Changes in mandibular morphology seem to be less distinguishing features in incomplete or abortive types of mandibulofacial dysostosis. KEY WORDS craniofacial problems, mandible, mandibulofacial dysostosis, maxilla, sphenoid bone, temporal bone, zygomatic bone Mandibulofacial dysostosis (MFD) often roentgencephalometric examinations were results in the development of a characteristic made of the skulls, and tomograms were ob- facial disfigurement with considerable simi- tained of the internal and middle ear. Com- larity between affected individuals. However, parisons were made with normal adult skulls the symptoms may vary highly in respect to and with an adult skull exhibiting the char- type and degree, and both incomplete and acteristics of MFD. All of the skulls were from abortive forms of the syndrome have been the same ethnic group. ' reported in the literature (Franceschetti and Klein, 1949; Moss et al., 1964; Rogers, 1964). Results In previous papers, we have shown the DEsCRIPTION OF THE SKULLS. -
Maxillary Incisive Canal Characteristics: a Radiographic Study Using Cone Beam Computerized Tomography
Hindawi Radiology Research and Practice Volume 2019, Article ID 6151253, 5 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6151253 Research Article Maxillary Incisive Canal Characteristics: A Radiographic Study Using Cone Beam Computerized Tomography Penala Soumya ,1 Pradeep Koppolu ,2 Krishnajaneya Reddy Pathakota,3 and Vani Chappidi4 1 Department of Dentistry, Mahavir Institute of Medical Sciences, Vikarabad, Telangana, India 2Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Dar Al Uloom University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia 3Department of Peroiodontics, Sri Sai College of Dental Surgery, Vikarabad, India 4Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Sri Sai College of Dental Surgery, Vikarabad, Telangana, India Correspondence should be addressed to Penala Soumya; [email protected] Received 1 November 2018; Accepted 5 March 2019; Published 27 March 2019 Academic Editor: Paul Sijens Copyright © 2019 Penala Soumya et al. Tis is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Background. Te incisive canal located at the midline, posterior to the central incisor, is an important anatomic structure of this area to be considered while planning for immediate implant placement in maxillary central incisor region. Te purpose of the present study is to assess incisive canal characteristics using CBCT sections. Materials and Methods. CBCT scans of 79 systemically healthy patients, with intact maxillary incisors, were evaluated by two calibrated and independent examiners. Assessments included (1) mesiodistal diameter, (2) labiopalatal diameter, (3) length of the incisive canal, (4) shape of incisive canal, and (5) width of the bone anterior to the incisive foramen. -
MBB: Head & Neck Anatomy
MBB: Head & Neck Anatomy Skull Osteology • This is a comprehensive guide of all the skull features you must know by the practical exam. • Many of these structures will be presented multiple times during upcoming labs. • This PowerPoint Handout is the resource you will use during lab when you have access to skulls. Mind, Brain & Behavior 2021 Osteology of the Skull Slide Title Slide Number Slide Title Slide Number Ethmoid Slide 3 Paranasal Sinuses Slide 19 Vomer, Nasal Bone, and Inferior Turbinate (Concha) Slide4 Paranasal Sinus Imaging Slide 20 Lacrimal and Palatine Bones Slide 5 Paranasal Sinus Imaging (Sagittal Section) Slide 21 Zygomatic Bone Slide 6 Skull Sutures Slide 22 Frontal Bone Slide 7 Foramen RevieW Slide 23 Mandible Slide 8 Skull Subdivisions Slide 24 Maxilla Slide 9 Sphenoid Bone Slide 10 Skull Subdivisions: Viscerocranium Slide 25 Temporal Bone Slide 11 Skull Subdivisions: Neurocranium Slide 26 Temporal Bone (Continued) Slide 12 Cranial Base: Cranial Fossae Slide 27 Temporal Bone (Middle Ear Cavity and Facial Canal) Slide 13 Skull Development: Intramembranous vs Endochondral Slide 28 Occipital Bone Slide 14 Ossification Structures/Spaces Formed by More Than One Bone Slide 15 Intramembranous Ossification: Fontanelles Slide 29 Structures/Apertures Formed by More Than One Bone Slide 16 Intramembranous Ossification: Craniosynostosis Slide 30 Nasal Septum Slide 17 Endochondral Ossification Slide 31 Infratemporal Fossa & Pterygopalatine Fossa Slide 18 Achondroplasia and Skull Growth Slide 32 Ethmoid • Cribriform plate/foramina -
Radiological Localization of Greater Palatine Foramen Using Multiple Anatomical Landmarks
MOJ Anatomy & Physiology Research Article Open Access Radiological localization of greater palatine foramen using multiple anatomical landmarks Abstract Volume 2 Issue 7 - 2016 Identification of greater palatine foramen is of prime value for dentists and the oral and Viveka S,1 Mohan Kumar2 maxillofacial surgeons. The objective of present study was to radiologically localize greater 1Department of Anatomy, Azeezia Institute of Medical Sciences, palatine foramen with multiple anatomical landmarks. All Computer Tomography scans India of individuals who have undergone paranasal sinus evaluation were obtained from the 2Department of Radiology, Azeezia Institute of Medical Sciences, Department of Radiology, Azeezia Institute of Medical Sciences, from April 2015 to April India 2016. Distance of greater palatine foramen from various known anatomical landmarks was measured across the CT slices. Forty-four CT scans were studied, mean age was 32(±2.3) Correspondence: Viveka S, Assistant professor, Department years. All scans were from individuals of south Indian origin. GPF was located at 38.38mm of Anatomy, Azeezia Institute of Medical Sciences, Kollam, India, from incisive fossa, 17.6mm from posterior nasal spine, 18.38mm from intermaxillary Email [email protected] suture, 5.03mm from second molar and 5.28mm from third molar. Distances of GPF from incisive foramen and intermaxillary suture differed significantly on right and left sides. In Received: May 25, 2016 | Published: December 29, 2016 25(56.8%) cases GPF was located closer to third molar. In seven cases, it was closer to second molar and in 12 cases, GPF was located at the junction of second and third molar. Posterior location of GPF, posterior to third molar is not noted.