DOCSLIB.ORG

Kingston Mini-Holland Programme Outline Business Case | Report V7.0

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kingston Mini-Holland Programme Outline Business Case | Report V7.0 Kingston mini-Holland Royal Borough of Kingston upon Programme Outline Thames Business Case Report v7.0 Our ref: 22717901 July 2014 Kingston mini-Holland Royal Borough of Kingston upon Programme Outline Thames Business Case Report v7.0 Our ref: 22717901 July 2014 Prepared by: Prepared for: Steer Davies Gleave Royal Borough of Kingston upon 28-32 Upper Ground Thames London SE1 9PD Guildhall 2 High Street Kingston upon Thames KT1 1EU +44 (0)20 7910 5000 www.steerdaviesgleave.com Steer Davies Gleave has prepared this work for Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames. This work may only be used within the context and scope of work for which Steer Davies Gleave was commissioned and may not be relied upon in part or whole by any third party or be used for any other purpose. Any person choosing to use any part of this work without the express and written permission of Steer Davies Gleave shall be deemed to confirm their agreement to indemnify Steer Davies Gleave for all loss or damage resulting therefrom. Steer Davies Gleave has prepared this work using professional practices and procedures using information available to it at the time and as such any new information could alter the validity of the results and conclusions made. Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... i Programme Objectives and Strategic Fit ....................................................................................... i Need for Investment ...................................................................................................................... i Scheme Description .......................................................................................................................ii Costs ............................................................................................................................................. iii Benefits ......................................................................................................................................... iii Assessment ................................................................................................................................... iv Delivery programme ..................................................................................................................... iv 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 1 Background ................................................................................................................................... 1 Assumptions and Limitations........................................................................................................ 2 2 Scheme Objectives and Fit with Strategy ............................................................................. 3 Scheme Objectives ........................................................................................................................ 3 Assessment against Strategy ........................................................................................................ 4 Need for Improvement ............................................................................................................... 15 Constraints and Dependencies ................................................................................................... 24 3 Scheme Development and Description .............................................................................. 27 Scheme Development ................................................................................................................. 27 Scheme Description .................................................................................................................... 36 Scheme Illustrations ................................................................................................................... 42 Needs and Issues Addressed ...................................................................................................... 46 4 Scheme Costs ................................................................................................................... 47 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 47 Approach to Costing ................................................................................................................... 47 Updated Scheme Costs ............................................................................................................... 49 Operating, Maintenance and Renewal Costs ............................................................................. 52 5 Strategic Benefits ............................................................................................................. 54 Key Strategic Benefits ................................................................................................................. 54 Summary of Strategic Benefits against Objectives ..................................................................... 57 July 2014 Summary of Strategic Benefits by User Group ........................................................................... 58 6 Economic Case.................................................................................................................. 60 Overview and Assessment Methodology ................................................................................... 60 Cycling Demand and Characteristics .......................................................................................... 60 Scenarios Assessed ..................................................................................................................... 62 Target Demand Impacts ............................................................................................................. 63 Conventional Benefits ................................................................................................................. 64 Value for Money Assessment ..................................................................................................... 70 Sensitivity Testing ....................................................................................................................... 72 7 Wider Benefits ................................................................................................................. 73 Wider Economic Benefits ........................................................................................................... 73 Urban Realm ............................................................................................................................... 74 8 Delivery ........................................................................................................................... 75 Funding ....................................................................................................................................... 75 Programme ................................................................................................................................. 75 Risk Management ....................................................................................................................... 76 Project Governance .................................................................................................................... 77 Benefits Realisation .................................................................................................................... 79 Monitoring Programme .............................................................................................................. 80 Figures Figure 2.1: Cycling Potential in London ........................................................................................ 4 Figure 2.2: LTDS Average daily journey stages made within 3km of Kingston town centre by mode and journey time band (2010 to 2012 average) ............................................................... 15 Figure 2.3: Current traffic congestion across the borough (7am-10am) .................................... 17 Figure 2.4: PTALs across the borough......................................................................................... 17 Figure 2.5: Core Strategy – delivery of housing .......................................................................... 20 Figure 2.6: Major developments in Kingston.............................................................................. 21 Figure 2.7: Cycle flows and casualties in Kingston, 2001–2013 ................................................. 23 Figure 2.8: Proposed Crossrail 2 Route....................................................................................... 26 Figure 3.1: Scheme map ............................................................................................................. 41 July 2014 Figure 3.2: LM.1 Kingston Enterprise Hub and Kinston station plaza ........................................ 42 Figure 3.3: LM.3 Riverside Boardway ......................................................................................... 42 Figure 3.4: LM.4 New Malden to Raynes Park link ..................................................................... 43 Figure 3.5: NW.3 Portsmouth Road ............................................................................................ 43 Figure 3.6: NW.4 Kingston to Surbiton - Claremont Road .........................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Transport for London Kingston Transport Study Model Forecasting Report
    Transport for London Kingston Transport Study Model Forecasting Report Final | 13 June 2018 This report takes into account the particular instructions and requirements of our client. It is not intended for and should not be relied upon by any third party and no responsibility is undertaken to any third party. Job number 245418-00 Ove Arup & Partners Ltd 13 Fitzroy Street London W1T 4BQ United Kingdom www.arup.com Document Verification Job title Kingston Transport Study Job number 245418-00 Document title Model Forecasting Report File reference Document ref Revision Date Filename 2018 -01-17_KG_MFR_v01.docx Draft 1 1 7 Jan Description First draft 2018 Prepared by Checked by Approved by Edward Dawes Leon Name Tom Spencer Simon Camm Shrewsbury Rob Henley Signature Draft 2 23 Mar Filename 2018 -03-23_Kingston_MFR_v02.docx 2018 Description Second draft - addresses comments issued by TfL (31/01/2018) and includes mitigation chapters. Prepared by Checked by Approved by Leon Name Edward Dawes Simon Camm Shrewsbury Signature Final Issue 22 May Filename 2018 -05-22_Kingston_MFR_v03.docx 2018 Description Final Issue – addresses comments received from both TfL (16- 04-2018) and RBK (23-04-2018) Prepared by Checked by Approved by Leon Name Edward Dawes Simon Camm Shrewsbury Signature Rev ised 13 June Filename 2018 -06-13_Kingston_MFR_v04.docx Final Issue 2018 Description Final Issue – addresses comments received from RBK (29-05- 2018) Prepared by Checked by Approved by Leon Name Edward Dawes Simon Camm Shrewsbury Signature Issue Document Verification
    [Show full text]
  • Better Local Government
    Agenda Item No. Reference No. Better Local Government CHISWICK AREA COMMITTEE (MONITORING) 12 NOVEMBER 2003 CROSSRAIL BENCHMARK SCHEME AND OPTIONS 5 & 6 Report by: Assistant Chief Executive, Corporate Policy and Regeneration SUMMARY This report provides an update on the current status of the Crossrail project including the “Crossrail Benchmark Scheme”, and introduces LB Hounslow’s proposed alternative Options 5 and 6 for discussion. 1. RECOMMENDATION 1.1 That members note the current Crossrail Benchmark Scheme and endorse the Council’s proposal to submit Options 5 and 6 to Crossrail with a request for their evaluation against the Benchmark Scheme. 2. BACKGROUND 2.1 Crossrail is a proposed new rail service being developed by Cross London Rail Links Ltd (CLRLL), a 50/50 joint venture between Transport for London (TfL) and the Strategic Rail Authority (SRA). The Crossrail project comprises two proposed schemes - Crossrail Line 1 and Crossrail Line 2. 2.2 Crossrail Line 1 would be a high capacity east-west rail link across London serving Heathrow, the West End, the City and the Docklands. This proposal, now referred to as the “Crossrail Benchmark Scheme”, was formally unveiled by CLRLL in a Business Case Summary launch on 8 September 2003. 2.3 The Benchmark Scheme comprises four routes sharing a new tunnel under central London from Paddington to the East End. The tunnel would carry 24 trains/hour in peak periods. The proposed routes are:- • Heathrow corridor (6 trains/hour) replacing the Heathrow Express (4 trains/hour) subject to agreement with BAA and stopping also at Hayes & Harlington and Ealing Broadway.
    [Show full text]
  • Anglia Route Study March 2016 Contents March 2016 Network Rail – Anglia Route Study 02
    Long Term Planning Process Anglia Route Study March 2016 Contents March 2016 Network Rail – Anglia Route Study 02 Foreword 03 Executive Summary 04 Chapter 1: Background 13 Chapter 2: Consultation 16 Chapter 3: The Starting Point 24 Chapter 4: A Strategy for Growth - Conditional Outputs 40 Chapter 5: Meeting the Conditional Outputs 58 Appendix A: Cross-Boundary Approach 94 Appendix B: Option Assessment 98 Appendix C: Appraisal Tables 109 Appendix D: Anglia WRCCA Action Plan 117 Glossary 120 Executive Summary March 2016 Network Rail – Anglia Route Study 04 This document, part of the Long Term Planning 0.1 Introduction • The West Anglia Main Line (WAML) runs between London Liverpool Street and Kings Lynn and carries busy commuter and Process (LTPP), considers the potential outputs The Anglia Route Study seeks to establish the required future leisure traffic from Stansted Airport and Cambridge into London capacity and capability of the railway through a systematic analysis required by the railway network within the Anglia Liverpool Street. It has the potential for significant housing and of the future requirements of the network. It seeks to accommodate employment growth and connects world-leading centres for Route in Control Period 6 (2019-2024), as well as the conditional outputs articulated in the Long Term Planning biosciences and technology. further ahead up to the year 2043. It offers Process (LTPP) Market Studies, whilst maintaining and where funders sets of choices as to how those outputs possible improving operational performance, at a cost acceptable • The Orbital Routes, which include the North London Line (NLL) might be met, having regard to value-for-money, to funders and stakeholders.
    [Show full text]
  • Clapham Transport Users Group Response to Tfl/Dft Consultation
    Response to TfL/DfT Consultation On Devolving Control of London Rail Services to the Mayor of London is a voluntary stakeholder representative body advocating on behalf of public transport users in the Clapham area of South London. Our focus is on Tube, Bus, Dial-A-Ride and Rail services with full examination given to the inter-modal relationships between different forms of transport and the impact of transport with wider issues in Clapham and beyond. We have a valuable perspective to offer in our response to the consultation in that the suburban stations of Clapham High Street and Wandsworth Road were once run by British Rail and later Southern Trains but transferred to TfL as part of the extension of the London Overground East London Line Extension to Clapham Junction. The Clapham Transport Users Group was part of a ground of stakeholder bodies invited by TfL in 2006 to consider the development of a pan-London rail network under TfL control which led to the evolution of London Overground. Context Transport for London was set up in 2000 to replace London Transport and have steadily increased its control of public transport beyond the established areas of Bus and Tube. In 2006 TfL gained control of some orbital rail services previously operated by Silverlink Metro and re-branded as London Overground: it has steadily expanded to include all orbital rail services, an expansion of the East London Line and some suburban services out of Liverpool Street, including trains to Shenfield which will become Crossrail. In the political climate of greater devolution, the lack of control by TfL of London’s suburban rail network has been a significant anomaly, resulting in inconsistency of standards across rail networks not run by TfL.
    [Show full text]
  • Fairview New Homes (Willow Way) Ltd 229-255 Kingston Road, New Malden
    A Planning Application by FAIRVIEW NEW HOMES (WILLOW WAY) LTD In respect of 229-255 Kingston Road, New Malden Residential Travel Plan April 2019 229-255 Kingston Road, New Malden Fairview New Homes (Willow Way) Ltd Residential Travel Plan DOCUMENT SIGNATURE AND REVIEW SHEET Project Details Project Title: 229 -255 Kingston Road, New Malden Project No.: 1807 -64 Report No.: 1807 -64/TP/01B Client: Fairview New Homes (Willow Way) Ltd Prepared By: Checked By: Approved for issue Name W Griffiths S Moody N Hanks Signature WG SM NH Date April 2019 April 2019 April 2019 Document Review Revision Date Description Checked By A 30 April 2019 Minor amendments following NH comments B 30 April 2019 Minor amendments following SMK comments and revised cycle parking provision Issued by: Bristol Transport Planning Associates Cambridge 25 Southampton Buildings London London Manchester WC2A 1AL Oxford Welwyn Garden City 020 3709 9405 [email protected] www.tpa.uk.com 1807-64/TP/01B Transport Planning Associates April 2019 i 229-255 Kingston Road, New Malden Fairview New Homes (Willow Way) Ltd Residential Travel Plan CONTENTS PAGE 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 SCOPE AND OBJECTIVES OF THE TRAVEL PLAN 3 3 EXISTING CONDITONS AND SITE ACCESSIBILITY 5 4 PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT 13 5 TARGETS 15 6 MANAGEMENT STRATEGY 17 7 INITIATIVES AND MEASURES 19 8 MONITORING 22 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.1 Site Location Plan Figure 3.1 Accessibility Plan Figure 3.2 Facilities and Amenities Plan Figure 3.3 Walking Isochrones Plan Figure 3.4 Cycling WebCAT Time Mapping Figure 3.5 Public Transport
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Please Contact James Geach 020 8547 5062 E-Mail: [email protected]
    For enquiries on this agenda please contact James Geach 020 8547 5062 e-mail: [email protected] This agenda is available at: www.kingston.gov.uk/CommitteeMinutes AGENDA A meeting of the DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE will be held at the Guildhall, Kingston upon Thames on TUESDAY 12 FEBRUARY 2013 at 7:30 pm Members of the Committee Councillor Vicki Harris (Chair) Councillor David Cunningham Councillor David Ryder-Mills Councillor Ken Smith Councillor Chrissie Hitchcock Councillor Richard Hudson Councillor Malcolm Self Councillor Frank Thompson EMERGENCY EVACUATION ARRANGEMENTS On hearing the alarm which is a loud siren please leave the building by the nearest available fire exit and assemble by the triangle at the front of the Guildhall. Anyone requiring assistance to evacuate the building should go to the refuge areas which are situated outside Committee Room 1 and the Mayor’s Parlour where you will be met by a member of the building management team and assisted from the building. RECORDING OF THE MEETING - This meeting will be recorded and the recording will be available on the web site with the agenda and minutes. FILMING - residents and journalists/media wishing to film meetings are permitted to do so but are asked to give advance notice of this and respect any concerns expressed by people on being filmed. A LARGE PRINT COPY OF THE AGENDA can be requested in advance 2 Speaking on Planning Applications, Enforcement, or Tree Preservation Orders The arrangements for speaking on applications are based on both sides having equal time to make their points to Councillors.
    [Show full text]
  • Kingston Railway Station, Wood Street, Kingston Upon Thames, Kt1 1Uj
    KINGSTON TOWN PLANNING SUB-COMMITTEE 5 DECEMBER 2012 PLANNING CONSULTATION (12/12241/FUL): KINGSTON RAILWAY STATION, WOOD STREET, KINGSTON UPON THAMES, KT1 1UJ REPORT BY THE HEAD OF PLANNING AND TRANSPORT SUMMARY 1. This report seeks the Committee's views on application 12/12241/FUL for the erection of extension to platform 3 including extension to existing bridge over Richmond Road, prior to consideration of the application by the Development Control Committee. 2. The application is still under consideration and although the period set aside for consultation responses has expired, some may still be received. Further information will be circulated to the Sub-Committee upon the receipt of any further consultation responses. The proposal raises a number of considerations which are set out below in the main body of the report. RECOMMENDATION It is RECOMMENDED that the Sub-Committee express its views on the application so that the Development Control Committee can consider them when it determines this planning application. REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION To enable the Neighbourhood’s views to be considered. SITE AND SURROUNDINGS 1. The application site concerns Kingston Railway Station which is a primary gateway into the town. Kingston Railway Station is located in the middle of the one-way system which includes the A307 & A308 (Clarence Street , Kingsgate Road , Sopwith Way and Richmond Road). 2. The application itself specifically concerns the eastern part of the station, adjacent to properties on Richmond Road and residential dwellings along Canbury Park Road and the student accommodation Quebec House. 3. The application site lies within flood zones 2 and 3a.
    [Show full text]
  • Turning South London Orange
    Jonathan Roberts Brell Wilson Brell Roberts Jonathan GROWTH OF WAVE NEXT LONDON’S SUPPORT TO RAIL SUBURBAN REFORMING ORANGE: LONDON SOUTH TURNING TURNING SOUTH LONDON ORANGE: REFORMING SUBURBAN RAIL TO SUPPORT LONDON’S NEXT WilsonBrell Jonathan Roberts SimsSam WAVE OF GROWTH TURNING SOUTH LONDON ORANGE: REFORMING SUBURBAN RAIL TO SUPPORT LONDON’S NEXT WAVE OF GROWTH Sam Sims, Jonathan Roberts, Brell Wilson Published by Centre for London, January 2016 Open Access. Some rights reserved. As the publisher of this work, Centre for London wants to encourage the circulation of our work as widely as possible while retaining the copyright. We therefore have an open access policy which enables anyone to access our content online without charge. Anyone can download, save, perform or distribute this work in any format, including translation, without written permission. This is subject to the terms of the Centre for London licence. Its main conditions are: · Centre for London and the author(s) are credited · This summary and the address www.centreforlondon.org are displayed · The text is not altered and is used in full · The work is not resold · A copy of the work or link to its use online is sent to Centre for London. You are welcome to ask for permission to use this work for purposes other than those covered by the licence. Centre for London gratefully acknowledges the work of Creative Commons in inspiring our approach to copyright. To find out more go to www.creativecommons.org Published by: Centre for London 2016 © Centre for London. Some rights reserved. 1 Plough Place London EC4A 1DE T: 020 3102 3767 [email protected] www.centreforlondon.org Company Number: 8414909 Charity Number: 1151435 Typeset by Soapbox, www.soapbox.co.uk Centre for London is a politically independent, not‑for‑profit think tank focused on the big challenges facing London.
    [Show full text]
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Infrastructure, Projects And
    Agenda For enquiries on this agenda, please contact: James Geach 020 8547 5062 email: [email protected] Published on 3 September 2014 Infrastructure, Projects & Contracts Committee Date: Thursday 11 September 2014 Time: 7:30 pm Place: Guildhall, Kingston upon Thames Members of the Committee Councillor Richard Hudson (Chair) Councillor David Cunningham (Vice Chair) Councillor Roy Arora Councillor Bill Brisbane Councillor Sheila Griffin Councillor Kevin Davis Councillor Stephen Brister Councillor Chris Hayes Councillor Hilary Gander Councillor Mike Head Councillor Lorraine Rolfe Councillor Priyen Patel Everyone is welcome to attend the meeting This agenda is available to view on: www.kingston.gov.uk You can also access this agenda through the Modern.gov app or by scanning the QR code with your smartphone. 2 AGENDA Questions and public participation • a 30 minute question and answer session at the start of the meeting –advance notice of questions is encouraged. • contributions during the debate on items at the discretion of the Chair 1. Apologies and attendance of alternate members 2. Declarations of interest Members are asked to declare any disclosable pecuniary interests and any other non- pecuniary interests (personal interests) relevant to items on this agenda. 3. Minutes To confirm the minutes of the meeting held on 19 June 2014. 4. 2013/14 Corporate Complaints Performance Information Appendix A To provide the Committee with information about how the Council manages complaints and Freedom of Information (FOI) requests made by customers through its Corporate Complaints and Freedom of Information (FOI) Procedures, and complaints that are made to the Ombudsman. Experimental Traffic Order and trial for thirty minutes free Appendix B 5.
    [Show full text]
  • South London Boroughs Partnership
    SOUTH LONDON TRANSPORT STRATEGY BOARD Response to Network Rail London & South East Route Utilisation Strategy Draft for Consultation Introduction The South London Transport Strategy Board represents the sub regional view of the seven South London Boroughs, Bromley, Croydon, Kingston, Merton, Richmond, Sutton and Wandsworth, with the Boroughs of Lambeth and Southwark included as associate members. In addition its membership includes Transport for London and South London Business. Our purpose is to promote and represent the interests of the south London sub-region, particularly with regard to strategic transport planning and direct investment in transport infrastructure. Since its inception the Strategy Board has consistently emphasised the importance of efficient and sustainable transport networks as a factor in economic growth as well as its impact on community wellbeing, education, health, tourism and spatial planning. Through building a strong evidence base, the Strategy Board, through the South London Partnership, has sought to influence TfL’s Sub Regional Transport Plan and has developed its own transport priorities for the sub region. These priorities are: • Enhancing Orbital Travel • Integrating Travel Options • Improving Supply • Influencing Demand We welcome the opportunity to respond to Network Rail’s draft Route Utilisation Strategy (RUS) for London and the South East. As a preliminary comment, we note that, as with the Mayor’s Transport Strategy and planning in London generally, the Draft RUS has a presumption against major development in South London. While some of our Boroughs are seeking to manage growth and overdevelopment locally we also believe that the levels of growth that have been assumed for some of the key urban centres in South London are too limited given, for example, the significant development within Croydon that is planned and the work that is being undertaken more widely by Boroughs such as Kingston.
    [Show full text]
  • M25 South West Quadrant Strategic Study: Evidence Report
    M25 South West Quadrant Strategic Study Evidence Report M25 South West Quadrant Strategic Study: Evidence Report Contents 0. Executive Summary ................................................................................................9 0.1 Introduction ..............................................................................................................9 0.2 Policy context ...........................................................................................................9 0.3 Previous studies ........................................................................................................9 0.4 Economic conditions ..............................................................................................10 0.5 Existing road network ............................................................................................. 11 0.6 Existing public transport network ............................................................................ 13 0.7 Environmental considerations ................................................................................. 14 1 Introduction ...........................................................................................................15 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 15 1.2 Problem identification .............................................................................................. 15 1.3 Study objectives ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Transport for London Briefing
    TRANSPORT FOR LONDON BRIEFING NOTE SUBJECT: Overnight weekend rail services MEETING DATE: 18 July 2014 1 BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY 1.1 The purpose of this note is to describe options for all rail services overnight on Friday and Saturday that could complement Night Tube. This to include: (a) London Overground (all routes including West Anglia) (b) Crossrail (c) DLR (d) Selected routes out of the major National Rail radial routes 1.2 Night Tube will operate an overnight service on Friday and Saturday nights, on the following lines: (a) Central, between Hainault and Ealing Broadway; (b) Jubilee, between Stanmore and Stratford; (c) Northern, between High Barnet/Edgware and Morden, both via Charing Cross branch (d) Piccadilly, between Cockfosters and Heathrow Terminal 5; and (e) Victoria, between Walthamstow and Brixton. 1.3 This represents 67 hours’ continuous operation on these lines. No service is proposed on other parts of the lines. The service will operate at four trains per hour. TfL has decided that now is the right time to introduce an overnight service for the following reasons: • Supporting London’s growing night time economy; • Night bus passenger numbers grown nearly 300% since 2000; • Line upgrades being completed, with new infrastructure reducing maintenance requirements; • Travel on the Underground after 22:00 is growing faster than all-day demand; • London’s business leaders, such as West End Commission, recommend it; and • Access Transformation Plan improve access at other times Page 1 of 10 1.4 Night Tube has a positive business case and is likely to cover its operating costs from additional revenue generated within a year of starting operations.
    [Show full text]